In this Discussion, you will be examining ethical principles in
research. Using the principles of ethics, briefly describe a
health-related situation that resulted in a deviation from ethical
treatment of subjects. The situation may be recent or historical. What
did researchers and health care professionals learn from this situation?
How can ethical decision-making prevent ethical misbehavior,
deviations, and lapses from happening again? What protections are now in
place and can they be enforced? What is the role of the Institutional
Review Board in organizations? Please use recent literature to support
your post and cite your use of articles at the end of your discussion
using APA format. This discussion should be 300 words.
Category: Writing
In this phase, you will perform exploratory data analysis (EDA), the most important first step of any data analysis project
Phase 2 – Exploring data (100 points)
In this phase, you will perform exploratory data analysis (EDA), the most important first step of any data analysis project.
a) Data visualization
Generate visualization using JMP for your variables that you want to analyze.
Create only the graphs that are relevant to your data.
For numerical variables, visualization (e.g., histograms) should be created, and shape and skewness should be discussed.
It is very important to explain your findings and insights from each visualization.
Please note, substantial points (20% to 30%) will be deducted if no interpretations and insights are found on your report.
b) Descriptive statistics
Calculate statistical summary measures for the numeric and categorical (qualitative) variables using JMP.
Summaries can include, but are not limited to, measures of center, measures of variation, measures of association (correlation), and quartiles.
Identify and comment on outliers and missing values.
It is very important to write your interpretations for each numerical measure. For example, you should interpret the mean, median, standard deviation, correlation coefficients, and the three quartiles.
Note: substantial points (20% to 30%) will be deducted if no interpretations and insights are found on your report.
Essay on analyzing and discussing the message of the poem and what the poem represents about society in the poem “In response to executive ,” by Dwight Okita.
2 page essay on analyzing and discussing the message of the poem and what the poem represents about society in the poem “In response to executive order 9066,” by Dwight Okita. https://rccd.instructure.com/courses/74154/files/14168499?verifier=PZNBFlkP4ivkB6qBbeTSTO565nhRs5L3JoC6jrhh&wrap=1
Requirements:
Reference poetic elements such as theme, rhyme, alliteration, metaphor, simile, symbols, imagery and discuss what effect those elements have. You do NOT have to reference each one; instead explain and refer to them when appropriate.
Include quotes from the poems as evidence. To further your analysis, you could then discuss diction/vocabulary used in the lines quotes.
Discuss context (a bit about the author and/or time period the poem was written in).
If you would like to research the poets listed, I recommend using the webpage poetryfoundation.org
Make sure to cite and format the quotescorrectly. For poems, use the line number you’re quoting, summarizing, or paraphrasing instead of page number. When quoting multiple lines at once, use a slash/ to indicate where the line breaks from one line to the next.
Use this page (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_formatting_quotations.html) from Purdue OWL for more help and formatting rules.
Essay should be in MLA format (Times New Roman, double-spaced, header, 1 inch margins, etc. ).
Include a Works Cited page, even if you only write about 1 poem. This will not count as one of the pages
Essay should be written in third person point of view (stay away from “I, we, us, you” pronouns)
For this benchmark, you will use the “COE Lesson Plan Template” to create a cross-disciplinary STEM lesson plan, aligned to your state standards.
Lesson plans require careful planning. To create a meaningful and relevant learning experience for students, teachers must consider the standards and learning objectives, the needs of the students, effective methods and strategies, and appropriate assessment strategies.
Based on your discussion and collaboration with your mentor teacher during your first field experience, incorporate mentor feedback to create a lesson plan for your content area.
For this benchmark, you will use the “COE Lesson Plan Template” to create a cross-disciplinary STEM lesson plan, aligned to your state standards.
Be specific when including the following:
Theme and description in the Lesson Summary and Focus section
State and NGSS standards, across content areas, that support the theme of the lesson and unit in the National/State Learning Standards section
Strategies to develop cross-disciplinary skills, encourage inquiry, and engage students in applying the central concepts within science, technology, engineering, and math in the Multiple Means of Engagement section
Resources, materials, and technology to guide students to access, interpret, evaluate, and apply information in science, technology, engineering, and math in the Resources, Materials, Equipment, and Technology section
With the approval of your mentor teacher, implement this lesson in Clinical Field Experience C.
In addition, write a 250-500 word reflection on the process of creating a STEM lesson plan. Include in your reflection:
How you integrated feedback from your mentor teacher.
Explanation of your collaboration with the librarian or media specialist (from Clinical Field Experience A).
Who else, either at the school site or in the community, might you collaborate with in developing this lesson?
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
How do you think this conforms, or does not conform, with the principles set out in Buddhism?
How do you think this conforms, or does not conform, with the principles set out in Buddhism?
Please discuss the following prompt:
There is a story of a Buddhist monk who was on a ship with a maniac who was killing everyone on board. The monk eventually decided to kill the man in order to prevent further harm of others on board. How do you think this conforms, or does not conform, with the principles set out in Buddhism? How do you think karma and compassion come into play in this story?
The essay should be approximately 1000 words and include the following:
Use at least one source from our assigned readings for class;
Use at least one peer-reviewed source found outside our course readings;
Use Chicago Manual of Style with footnotes and bibliography for citations (Chicago Manual of Style 17th Edition (Full note).
Create a brochure on conception and prenatal development.Select one of the provided scenarios and then address the following factors below:
Assessment Description
Directions: Refer to the instructor announcements for further instruction. Create a brochure on conception and prenatal development. Select one of the provided scenarios and then address the following factors below:
Scenario 1: A couple is expecting a baby and the pregnancy was not planned. They are meeting with various groups and individuals (i.e., medical doctor, Planned Parenthood, pastor, adoptive parents) to help them make an informed decision about the pregnancy. The couple is given an educational brochure from the agency or individual they met with to help support their decision.
Scenario 2: A young single female was assaulted and is pregnant. She is scared, angry, and unsure of what to do with her unplanned pregnancy. She is meeting with various groups and individuals (i.e., medical doctor, Planned Parenthood, pastor, adoptive parents) to help her make an informed decision about the pregnancy. She is given an educational brochure from the agency or individual she met with to help support her decision.
Address the questions below within the brochure.
Important Factors: What can the couple or single female expect during the pregnancy both during conception and prenatal period of development? What are some important factors that the parents should take into consideration during this period (e.g., environmental influences, diet, medications, drugs)?
Support Systems: Provide information about the individual or agency the couple or single female met with (e.g., Planned Parenthood). Include local contact information and a brief description of the agency or individual support they received (i.e., describe what the agency support includes).
Options and Resources: What counsel was the couple or single female provided? Outline all options the couple or single female were given and offer a brief description of each. Provide statistics for the couple or single female to help them decide. Provide additional resources for the couple or single female (e.g., support groups, clinics) should they need to follow up with a specific agency or doctor.
Christian Worldview: Blend into the discussion what the Christian worldview lens looks like for an unplanned pregnancy. What advice would the couple be given if they believe in the Christian worldview? This can be in the form of a quote or scripture passage that is meaningful and applicable to the topic.
A minimum of two to three scholarly sources are required (the textbook may count as one of these). When using credible websites, please limit use to .org, .edu, .mil, or .gov. Websites may be used for secondary supportive sources only. They may not be used as primary sources of information to support this assignment.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Identify and describe practice barriers for all four APNs’ roles in your state and discuss these barriers on a state and national level
Using the readings from this week as well as reliable outside resources to:
Identify and describe practice barriers for all four APNs’ roles in your state and discuss these barriers on a state and national level. The four roles include the nurse midwife, nurse anesthetist, nurse practitioner, and clinical nurse specialist.
Identify forms of competition on the state and national level that interfere with APNs’ ability to practice independently.
Identify the specific lawmakers by name at the state level (i.e., key members of the state’s legislative branch and executive branch of government)
Discuss interest groups that exist at the state and national levels that influence APN policy.
Discuss methods used to influence change in policy in forms of competition, state legislative and executive branches of government, and interest groups.
A scholarly resource must be used for EACH discussion question each week.
answer the above questions in 2 pages, excluding title and reference page. APA format
also responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion
DISCUSSION CONTENT
Practice Barriers1515%Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence describes APN barriers to practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Competition1515%Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating the forms of competition to APN practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Key Law Makers1515%Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry in identifying law makers at the state level. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Interest Groups1515%Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry at identifying interest groups at the state and national level. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Methods to Influence Change1515%Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of methods used to influence a change to eliminate barriers.
Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
7575%Total CONTENT Points = 75 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Interactive Dialogue2020%4 Required Elements:
Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;
Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)
Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.
Grammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation55%Grammar, syntax, spelling, and punctuation are accurate.
2525%Total FORMAT Points = 25 pts
100100%DISCUSSION TOTAL = 100 pts
For this distinctive paper on socioemotional development, the student will select at least one of the applicable stages of socioemotional development, as proposed by Erik Erikson, and write about anything related to their personal development, during that stage/challenge.
Information: Socio-emotional development, or processes involve changes in the individual’s
relationship with other people, changes in emotions, and changes in personality.
Directions: For this distinctive paper on socioemotional development, the student will select at least
one of the applicable stages of socioemotional development, as proposed by Erik Erikson, and write
about anything related to their personal development, during that stage/challenge. The student will
simply write about how they either developed the associated virtue, or how it was compromised
developmentally.
The student should only write about one of the challenges, or conflicts (as Erikson refers to them –
emotional conflicts, which must be reconciled) they have experienced, and only if it is applicable. Ex.:
If the student is 20, then they could not write about the socioemotional development challenge of
generativity vs. stagnation that occurs in middle adulthood, because they have not lived through that
stage yet, therefore is would be non-applicable.
NOTE: The emotional challenge/development of trust vs. mistrust occurs at every stage in the lifespan,
thus the development of trust or mistrust could be written about at any stage. Student will write about
themselves, and their human growth and development, respective of their socioemotional development
only. The focus of this paper is socioemotional development, and one of Erikson’s psychosocial
stages.
It is entirely possible that you may need to support your selected stage, with development of a
stage, or stages that occurred prior. The student’s paper must reflect that they fully understand the concept of socioemotional development and relative to their lifespan, and the stage they have selected.
The paper(s) must include:
1. A title page (in APA format – see section below re: “APA Formatting”).
• See this link for a sample paper/title page. General Format – Purdue OWL® – Purdue
University
• Simply mimic the title page contained in the sample paper
• Title of this paper: Dash Self-Reflection Paper: Socioemotional Development
• Department of Psychology
• You should know the course name and number, and the rest that follows
2. No running head is required, or desired. Title page, with the next page being the paper.
3. One page (minimum) – two pages (maximum) in length, double-spaced and writing in paragraphs.
• Double-spaced pages
• Use paragraphs
• DO NOT submit single-spaced, and without paragraphs
4. Times New Roman, 12 pt. font with one-inch margins on each side.
• Please do not adjust the margins or font, to make the paper “appear” to be meet the length
requirements. I catch this, and if done, grading will occur in proportion to what the student
has submitted. Ex.: If you write half of the paper, grading occurs at half value for all criteria.
5. Submit/upload in Word or word-processing software format. NO PDFs.
In a researched argument, you should examine scholarly articles that discuss a range of perspectives on contemporary issues being debated in various arenas, including academic disciplines
Introduction: Making an argument—expressing a point of view on a subject and supporting it with evidence—is often the aim of academic writing, even if the word “argument” is never used. Many of your college instructors may assume that you know this and not explain the importance of an argumentative stance to you in class. However, in college, you will often be asked to do more than just present information that you have gathered or regurgitate facts that were discussed in class. You will need to select or construct a point of view and provide evidence to develop your own considered argument.
In a researched argument, you should examine scholarly articles that discuss a range of perspectives on contemporary issues being debated in various arenas, including academic disciplines. You should put scholarly articles into conversation with each other by drawing connections or pointing out disparities among and between them. As a new member of the academic community, you should find where your voice, perspective, and argument fit into the existing conversation. So, unlike a research report (a popular high school genre that summarizes or explains ideas), an Argumentative Researched Essay asks writers to interpret a wide spectrum of perspectives, and offer their own creative insights.
Through the earlier assignments in this class, you’ve been exploring a topic and working towards developing an argument that interests you. Now is the time to begin writing it up as an argumentative essay. A Researched Argument should include a specific, explicit argument that you support and develop with sources in order to persuade a reader.
Requirements:
The Researched Argument should build on the work you’ve done to this point.
You must integrate a variety of sources in your paper, four of which must be scholarly (published in a scholarly peer-reviewed journal or collected in an anthology of scholarly articles published by a university press). Use the sources to establish a thread of conversation. Join in that conversation. Most students will have a total of 6-12 sources for this paper. You may have more or less, but expect your reader to scrutinize your choices.
In the process of integrating the ideas of others into your writing, you must demonstrate that you are able to:
Balance between summary, paraphrase, and direct quotation
Show that you understand the correct way to paraphrase and quote directly
Follow the citation requirements of MLA or another documentation style
Avoid improper citation and plagiarism.
Your essay should have a clearly recognizable thesis-statement in the form of an argument that a reasonable person could disagree with. The “So what?” of your argument should be recognizable by the end. The best Researched Argument essays are ones that establish new and interesting ideas and propositions.
Your Researched Argument will be 8-10 pages with 1 inch margins. You will use a 12-point, Times New Roman font and double-space your text. You will adhere to stylistic formatting as agreed on with your instructor. MLA is the default style.
Form: The tone, register, and language should relate to the secondary audience for the piece, the research-conscious, academic community of Ohio University, and, for some of you, the extended audience you may seek to reach with publication or presentation.
Challenges: Everyone writing these will have research from the AB at their disposal. The challenge is putting the most relevant sources together in discussion and joining in that discussion, as well. This means thoughtful choices on what to include, synthesis in putting them in conversation with one another, and confidence to add your own voice. A reader should see you engaged with the sources.
Classical economists believe that prices and quantities adjust to changes in supply and demand
Classical economists believe that prices and quantities adjust to changes in supply and demand
Classical economists believe that prices and quantities adjust to changes in supply and demand and that the economy produces its potential output in the long run. On the contrary, Keynesian economists believe the economy’s equilibrium output in the long run may be less than its potential output due to price and wage rigidities. What is price-wage rigidity? Do you agree with Keynes assessment that wage-price rigidity requires government’s involvement in the markets? Why? Why not?
Submit your initial post by midnight, Day 3. Please respond to two of your classmates’ posts by midnight, Day 7.