Identify and explain at least two research methods that you considered for your

Identify and explain at least two research methods that you considered for your

Identify and explain at least two research methods that you considered for your thesis. Which method did you select? How and why did you make this decision? Please include your research question at the beginning of your post!
see attached paper which contains my thesis and research question.

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
**I attached the instructions and powerpoint you will be using to help you answers these questions. please use any outside source to help you answer as well and reference them please in APA formatting**
The treatment guidelines will have three components:
◦ New Start Procedures:
▪ Indicate what procedures a therapist should perform to prepare for a patient’s first day of treatment.
▪ Indicate what paperwork should be completed and checked, and what should be conveyed to the patient prior to treatment.
▪ Describe what should be done if certain tasks are incomplete, and how to resolve them (e.g. what should the therapist do if consents are not signed, if a plan is not ready, etc.).
▪ Describe what steps should for the first treatment including special imaging, billing, time-outs, charting, etc.
◦ Daily Treatment Procedures:
▪ Describe the instructions for a typical treatments including setup, billing, charting, on-treatment visits, etc.
▪ Explain how to deal with unique situations that may arise and how to resolve them (e.g. patient motion, patient does not show up for treatment, changes in prescription, etc.).
◦ End-of-Treatment Procedures:
▪ Describe what to do for final treatments (e.g. additional information to be conveyed, follow-ups, billing, etc.).
Requirements: Draft + 5-8 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages | .doc file
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.
Please be sure to use credible or scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.

please make a literature review on the assignment which I attached. The literatu

please make a literature review on the assignment which I attached.
The literatu

please make a literature review on the assignment which I attached.
The literature review focuses on how other researchers have addressed similar questions. It places the study in context and discusses how it will differentiate itself from what is already in the field. You are attempting to establish what the literature says, and where the gap exists that you plan to fill with your project. You may find help at http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/tutorials/litreview/. Please make sure not to “stack” sources. Weave each source into the relevance of your project and each other. Group the literature by themes and use headings. This is NOT an annotated bibliography and should not be written like on.
Your literature review should rely strictly on scholarly material to include think tank publications (not websites) and peer reviewed journal articles. Using websites or news/media articles is NOT acceptable. Please see the lesson module for Weeks 4, 5, and 6 for examples of student and scholarly literature reviews.
Technical Requirements:
Your paper must be at a minimum of 10-15 pages (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit).
Scholarly and credible references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at least 2 scholarly sources per page of content.
Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space.
Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.
Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.
All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric.Requirements: 10 pages

Write a speech/research paper about Abortion – Is a baby a life before it is bor

Write a speech/research paper about Abortion – Is a baby a life before it is bor

Write a speech/research paper about Abortion – Is a baby a life before it is born? If so, does the baby have rights? Does humanity have the right to terminate a pregnancy? If so, at what stage is it no longer morally or ethically right to abort a baby? 
Write and present a speech taking one side of the argument. 
Your speech should be written in complete sentences and in a manner in which someone else could present the speech for you if you could not. Your speech should reference a minimum of three sources directly supporting your thesis. Include all sources on the Works Cited page at the end of your written document in MLA format.   

Unit 3 Assignment: Sensory Treasure Baskets for Babies Attached Files: CHS201 U

Unit 3 Assignment: Sensory Treasure Baskets for Babies
Attached Files:
CHS201 U

Unit 3 Assignment: Sensory Treasure Baskets for Babies
Attached Files:
CHS201 Unit 3 Assignment Sensory Treasure Baskets for Babies .pdf CHS201 Unit 3 Assignment Sensory Treasure Baskets for Babies .pdf – Alternative Formats (178.01 KB)
For this assignment, you will assemble two Sensory Treasure Baskets for Babies with at least five items per basket. Decide if you will photograph the baskets, write a reflection paper, or create a video. Either way, you must include the following:
Explain the purpose and value of Sensory Treasure Baskets for Babies.
Describe the items in each basket and why you included them.
Tell your thoughts on using SensoryTreasure Baskets for Babies.
See the attached document for complete instructions and a grading rubric. Submit your completed assignment to the above submission link by 11:59 p.m. EST, Sunday of Unit 3.

Exam Content A project plan is based on research and organizational goals. Refer

Exam Content
A project plan is based on research and organizational goals. Refer

Exam Content
A project plan is based on research and organizational goals. Refer to the Balanced Scorecard you created in Week 3. 
Select 4 of your objectives and determine how you will create day-to-day tasks that are needed to meet your objectives. 
Complete the Project Plan template for the needs identified in your Week 3 Balanced Scorecard. For your project plan you should:
Develop the project objectives.
Explain what operational steps will be taken to achieve your stated objectives.
Identify the responsible person(s) for each operational step.
Outline a timeline for each operational step. 
Justify the choices you made in your project plan in a 525- to 700-word explanation in the Project Plan template.
Format references and citations according to APA guidelines.

Overview Within the natural resource management disciplines, there has been a gr

Overview
Within the natural resource management disciplines, there has been a gr

Overview
Within the natural resource management disciplines, there has been a growing recognition of the need to incorporate traditional knowledge into management, as well as adopting co-management approaches.  This is especially true when Indigenous cultures are involved.  While use of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) and co-management has definite philosophical benefits, there are, in practice, significant difficulties.  Many of these arise from the epistemological lenses that trained natural resource managers wear intersecting with distinctly different ways of ‘knowing’.  Some of the well-known efforts have been characterized as particularly insidious forms of cultural appropriation. This combination of knowledge from different knowledge systems is a difficult aspect of wildlife management that is trying to incorporate TEK.
Literature Cited
Houde, N. 2007. The six faces of traditional ecological knowledge: challenges and opportunities for Canadian co-management arrangements. Ecology and Society 12(2): 34. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art34/Links to an external site. 
Rathwell, K.J., D. Armitage, and F. Berkes. 2015. Bridging knowledge systems to enhance governance of the environmental commons: a typology of settings. International Journal of the Commons 9(2):851-880.
View rubric
Initial Post
Due Date: 3 AM ET, Thursday
For this discussion, based on your viewing of the Vimeo, the week’s readings, and outside material, provide your thoughts on the use of TEK and co-management by natural resource managers.  In particular, Houde (2007) describes TEK as having six aspects (‘faces’), three of which deal with knowledge generation and three of which are based on underlying values and belief systems. In your post, make sure to specifically deal with the three faces based on underlying value systems. In addition, Rathwell et al (2015) provide a framework consisting of four large categories to guide managers wishing to inform management with knowledge from both scientific and traditional sources. Please address the following prompts and utilize additional literature resources to support your statements.  
Which of the three ‘faces’ of TEK that deal with the underlying value system, as described by Houde (2007), do you find most challenging to address and acknowledge as a wildlife manager? For each, address why they present a challenge.
What process might a wildlife manager use to incorporate TEK into management actions and decision-making? Utilize the ideas of Rathwell et al (2015) to inform your proposed approach.
Mark as done.
Responses
Due Date: 3 AM ET, Monday
Please respond to at least three of your classmates by expanding on their initial posts. Provide examples to support or challenge their statements.
Rubric
Title:
Week 6 Discussion: Western Science & Traditional Knowledge
Week 6 Discussion: Western Science & Traditional Knowledge
Criteria Ratings Pts
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post
Identifies one underlying value ‘face’ as the most challenging and provides rationale for perspective. Synthesizes framework from Rothwell to recommend ways to integrate TEK into management approaches. Uses proper grammar, appropriate terminology, and correct spelling. Integrates outside sources relevant to the discussion and cites using a standardized citation style (eg, APA, CSE, Chicago, etc.).
Range 
threshold: pts
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
4 pts
— 
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponses
Compares and contrasts three peers’ ‘face’ challenges with their own and assesses their integration of TEK. Uses proper grammar, appropriate terminology, and correct spelling. Integrates outside sources relevant to the discussion and cites using a standardized citation style (eg, APA, CSE, Chicago, etc.).
Range 
threshold: pts
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
6 pts
— 
Total Points: 10 out of 10

Many Americans believe that access to a good education is all that is needed to

Many Americans believe that access to a good education is all that is needed to

Many Americans believe that access to a good education is all that is needed to overcome inequality in U.S. society. What are some of the factors that may have contributed to this problem? How serious do you believe this problem to be? How would you attempt to fight it?
Research to answer the question and include 3 reference links.