William James and the Philosophy of Pragmatism

On a late September morning in 1891, William James walked reluctantly to his class in Harvard College’s Sever Hall. Characteristically dressed in a colorful shirt and a Norfolk jacket with a boutonniere, he must have seemed slightly bohemian. His lectures were spontaneous and rambling, unlike those of his more logical, organized colleagues. James claimed he did not like teaching, particularly to listless Harvard undergraduates. Yet he was good at it, even exceptional. Conversation with James, Walter Lippmann recalled, was “the greatest thing that has happened to me in my college life.” W. E. B. Du Bois wrote, “He was my friend and guide to clear thinking.” In his biography of James, Robert Richardson says, “William James was one of America’s great teachers.”

William James also avoided his study. In 1878 he signed a contract to write a psychology textbook in two years. It took 12. Writing was harder for him than speaking at conferences or climbing mountains. Sprinkled with anecdotes and personal examples and written in energetic prose, The Principles of Psychology, published in 1890, was praised in America and Europe both by academics and lay readers. Historian Jacques Barzun declared it a classic and likened it to Moby-Dick.

The psychology text was just a start. Throughout his life, James wrote essays and books that transformed psychology and philosophy. He popularized pragmatism, a distinctly American way of thinking that argues we must test our beliefs and decisions by results.

In Talks to Teachers on Psychology he took the insights of psychology to the classroom. In widely read essays, such as “What Makes A Life Significant,” he extolled optimism and empathy. At the end of his life, he wrote The Varieties of Religious Experience, legitimizing faith for an age dominated by reason and science. Alfred North Whitehead believed James was as significant a thinker as Plato, Aristotle, and Leibniz.

William James came from a distinguished and privileged family. His father, Henry, independently wealthy, was a friend of Emerson and Thoreau and wrote for the Atlantic Monthly. Restless, he moved his family from London to Paris to Newport, introducing them to Alfred Lord Tennyson and John Stuart Mill and seeking enlightenment and the perfect education for his five children, whom he cherished. William’s brother, Henry James, was one of America’s well-known novelists, writing about American aristocratic expatriates during the Gilded Age. Alice James, their sister, has recently become famous for her letters and diaries, emblematic of women stifled in a patriarchal, Victorian society.

William, the oldest child and always precocious, educated himself but could not find purpose or a career. In 1860 he studied art in Newport with William Morris Hunt. He journeyed to the Amazon in 1865 with the famous scientist Louis Agassiz to collect and study fish. He studied anatomy at Harvard Medical School. And he read voraciously: Charles Darwin, George Eliot, Thomas Huxley, Fyodor Dostoyevsky.

Neuroses accompanied his talent and wealth. Beneath an ebullient exterior, James concealed doubt and chronic illness—a bad back, weak eyes, constipation, insomnia, and depression. He avoided the Civil War, traveled back and forth from Europe, sank into suicidal melancholy, and sought relief with water cures, electrical currents, hypnosis, and nitrous oxide. He sought answers in books by such diverse thinkers as Thomas Carlyle and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Not until his mid 30s did he settle down and find some purpose and energy and some slight relief from his ailments.

Work and love were transformative. Charles William Eliot, president of a resurgent Harvard, offered James a job teaching anatomy in 1873. The publishing house Henry Holt gave him the contract for his psychology text. At 36 he married Alice Gibbens, a cultured, strong woman, devoted to her neurasthenic husband and the mother of their five children. In an apology after an argument with Alice, he wrote from abroad, “Darling, in all seriousness you have lifted me up out of lonely hell. . . . You have redeemed my life from destruction.”

Although James was grateful for his marriage to Alice, he never remained serene. He fled to the mountains when the semesters ended and departed to Europe when his Alice gave birth. He relapsed into melancholy and consulted psychics. As compensation for morbidness and passivity and as an antidote for recurring ill health, he commended optimism and action. His student at Harvard, Theodore Roosevelt, wrote: “Black care rarely sits behind a rider whose pace is fast enough.” James would have agreed.

Delivering the two-volume manuscript of The Principles of Psychology to his impatient publisher, James attached a note, which read, “No one could be more disgusted than I at the sight of the book.” Fellow academics quickly recognized a monumental work that combined laboratory research with introspective insights. James later rewrote some of the chapters for a condensed version that Harvard students affectionately called “Jimmy,” and Psychology: Briefer Course became the most important psychology textbook for college students across the country.

An early chapter of Psychology, “Habit,” was typical: “There is no more miserable human being than one in whom nothing is habitual but indecision.” James makes the case for habit, calling it the “enormous fly-wheel of society,” and offers specific suggestions about how to make useful actions automatic: Make resolutions, publicize them, act on them, and persist. Proper habits acted upon and pursued become embedded in the brain. Automaticity diminishes fatigue and sets free “our higher powers of mind.” It makes daily life bearable and civilization flourish.

James invented the phrase “stream of consciousness” to describe the workings of our minds. Our thinking is not orderly or logical but chaotic, our moods constantly and inexplicably shifting. “What was bright and exciting becomes weary, flat, and unprofitable.” The purpose of Psychology was to provide tentative insights into our vagrant minds and oscillating emotions. James tries to explain how we remember, how we associate, imagine, reason, feel, and act.

He consults authorities. In the chapter “On Self” he invokes Job and Marcus Aurelius. He becomes personal, unusual in textbooks. In “On Attention,” he mocks a procrastinating professor (likely himself) who will trim his nails, set the fire, or take down a book to avoid teaching a course on formal logic, which he hates. He offers advice on improving memory, fighting melancholy, and getting out of bed in the morning.

Of course parts of Psychology are dated. James did not know about the billions of neurons in the brain, the synapses that connect them, and neurotransmitters, such as dopamine and oxytocin. He could not peer into the brain during sexual arousal or depression. Contemporary psychologists would be put off by his digressions and moralizing and envious of his literary flair. Yet modesty was one of his appealing qualities: He expected and looked forward to being replaced by a “Galileo of psychology.”

In the mid 1890s James took to the road, traveling from Boston to Chicago to Colorado Springs, lecturing to thousands of teachers in an attempt to make money and to make his psychological research relevant in the classroom. He condensed his lectures into a small book called Talks to Teachers on Psychology.

Drawing from the chapter on association in Psychology, James argued that the skilled teacher commands attention by connecting his subject with students’ previous knowledge and experience. He lauds the masterful connector, the imaginative associator, the instructor who seizes the right moment and sets the right example.

James was optimistic about human potential but realistic about human nature. In the chapters “Will” and “Instinct,” this forerunner of evolutionary psychology reminded teachers that humans are aggressive, competitive, and covetous, but added that our fighting instinct can be made an ally of the educator by driving us to master difficult, unpalatable subjects: “Make the pupil feel ashamed of being scared of fractions, of being ‘downed’ by the law of falling bodies.”

Anticipating E. D. Hirsch’s defense of cultural literacy, James claimed that the best educated mind has the largest stock of ideas and concepts “ready to meet the largest possible variety of the emergencies of life.” At the same time anticipating Howard Gardner’s discovery of multiple intelligences, James insists that students vary in temperament and that a skilled instructor uses different techniques for different learning styles. Rare among Harvard professors at the time, James encouraged questions, praised without reservation, and invited students into his home. He was patient when a young Theodore Roosevelt pontificated.

I start the memorial service for my father in Cleveland’s Unitarian Church with a quotation from William James: “Be not afraid of life. Believe that life is worth living and your belief will help create the fact.” My father liked James, who stressed experimentation, affirmation, and action. Americans are practical and inventive, craving facts, weighing costs and benefits. For an idealistic, optimistic, utilitarian nation, James created an American philosophy, pragmatism.

Pragmatism was a method for making decisions, testing beliefs, settling arguments. In a world of chance and incomplete information, James insisted that truth was elusive but action mandatory. The answer: Make a decision and see if it works. Try a belief and see if your life improves. Don’t depend on logic and reason alone, add in experience and results. Shun ideology and abstraction. Take a chance. “Truth happens to an idea. It becomes true, is made true by events.”

James insisted he was more of a popularizer and synthesizer than an originator. Aristotle and John Stuart Mill were pragmatists, exponents of empiricism. Of course, some philosophers were skeptical of pragmatism. Truth becomes whatever is useful, whatever has cash value. Bertrand Russell was terrified that pragmatism would dethrone the ideal of objective truth, calling it “a form of the subjective madness which is characteristic of most modern philosophy.” Pragmatism to these skeptics encourages relativism and subjectivity and leads to irrationalism.

Not so, says contemporary historian James Kloppenberg. Pragmatism swept through the first half of twentieth-century America, encouraging the experimentation of Progressivism and the New Deal. Retreating, it is now returning, influencing legal realism and encouraging cultural pluralism and scientific government. According to Kloppenberg, it contributed to the worldview of Barack Obama. Pragmatism is the enemy of certainty, simplification, and fanaticism. It champions skepticism, experimentation, and tolerance.

We see pragmatism at work today when the United States Office of Management and Budget “scores” a tax proposal or a medical bill. When a corporate executive demands a cost benefit analysis, he is thinking pragmatically. Contemporary jurist Richard Posner makes the law pragmatic as he connects it to economics in his 2003 book Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. “The devil is in the details” has become a cliché, reflecting our faith in facts, utility, and common sense as well as the infusion of pragmatism into all areas of American life.

Pragmatism had another benefit. It allowed for God. James was always interested in religion and believed in its importance, encouraging his sons to attend Harvard’s early morning services. He confessed he had no experience of God, but he respected those who did. In the age of Darwin, he discovered in pragmatism a weapon to legitimate religious belief and unveiled his arguments in an 1896 lecture, “The Will to Believe.” (He told Henry it should have been titled “The Right to Believe.”) If, for an individual, faith leads to peace and security, banishes loneliness, increases endurance, and improves behavior, it can be said to be true for that individual. In all areas of life, we are acting on insufficient evidence. If religion increased happiness, encouraged ethical behavior, and offered eternal life, why not gamble?

James followed up “The Will to Believe” with 20 lectures delivered in Edinburgh, Scotland, and published in 1902 in a book he titled The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. Written when James was suffering from heart failure, Varietiesbecame a best-seller and his most influential work. It stays in print today.

In order to defend religious belief, James needed to understand it. He collected narratives of despair, accounts of mystical contacts, and descriptions of ecstasy. He offered the poetry of the “healthy-minded” soul, Walt Whitman, and the lament of a “sick soul,” Leo Tolstoy. He quoted Jonathan Edwards and Blaise Pascal and referenced Buddhists, Muslims, and Quakers. He included stories of men saved from tobacco, drink, and lust, of mystics energized by contact with a higher power, of missionaries who nursed the sick. “Every sort of energy and endurance, of courage and capacity for handling life’s evils, is set free in those who have religious faith.”

James describes how prayer can overcome melancholy, how confession eases guilt, and how sacrifice leads to serenity. Reminding us that “every individual existence goes out in a lonely spasm of helpless agony,” he describes religion’s most powerful appeal—the hope of an afterlife. Insisting that there are many kinds of consciousness, he sympathetically recorded the experiences of those who claimed contact with the unseen. Religion leads to “a larger, richer, more satisfying life,” adding zest, assuring safety, appealing to heroism.

Discounting rationalists’ claim to preeminence, he restored emotion and feeling to the religious quest and to the mind itself. Sigmund Freud insisted that religion “consists in depressing the value of life”; James believed that religion enhanced life. For would-be and wavering believers, James makes a powerful case. For skeptics, he has little to say about religion’s contributions to fanaticism, superstition, and war.

James did criticize religious hysteria. While he addressed an appreciative audience of a few thousand in Edinburgh, evangelist Dwight Moody preached an “old-fashioned gospel” to hundreds of thousands all over America and Europe. Denouncing evolution and preaching damnation, James’s contemporary, Billy Sunday, a former baseball star, reached millions.

Varieties remains for most believers a powerful defense against Karl Marx, who criticized religion as the opiate of the masses; against Freud, who dismissed religion as an illusion; and against contemporary writers, such as Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, and the late Christopher Hitchens, known together as “The Four Horsemen of Atheism.” Bill Wilson, the founder of Alcoholics Anonymous, read Varieties repeatedly. John Updike praised it in his 1999 essay “The Future of Faith,” as did A. N. Wilson in his book God’s Funeral.

In 1900, upper-class Americans found themselves in the middle of a crisis: neurasthenia, more commonly called weak nerves. The symptoms, according to its discoverer George Miller Beard, included depression, fatigue, and irritability. Its cause—stressful office work, crowded cities, new inventions, and rapid change. The James family suffered from neurasthenia, as did Theodore Roosevelt, who fled to the frontier, and Jane Addams, who embraced the downtrodden. Religion, justified by James, was one remedy, but there might be others: yoga, spiritualism, Christian Science, different levels of consciousness, different paths to serenity in an anxious age.

James investigated these “mind cures.” He became friends with Leonora Piper, a celebrated spiritualist, and attended her séances. He served as president of the Society of Psychical Research. James never endorsed a particular cure, but he defended inquiries into the phenomena, a pursuit his colleagues derided for encouraging superstition.

James did come up with his own form of mind cure in a series of lectures delivered in the decade before World War I. “The Energies of Men” delivered a bracing message: “Compared with what we ought to be, we are only half awake. Our fires are damped, our drafts are checked.” Citing examples of soldiers at war and civilians in the San Francisco earthquake, James argues that through necessity and will power we can all raise our energy levels and become more heroic.

James becomes a forerunner of the human-potential movement. Abraham Maslow credits James as an influence on his theory of self-actualization. Martin Seligman, the founder of positive psychology, praises James, as does Angela Duckworth, the author of the current best-seller Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance.

The essay “On a Certain Blindness in Human Beings” criticizes men and women who are so self-absorbed that they take no interest in others. He also criticizes the cerebral pessimist who loses contact with nature and disdains the ordinary. Praising Whitman and Wordsworth, James pleads for empathy, tolerance, and gratitude. Biographer Robert Richardson cites this essay, James’s favorite, as one of the “defining documents of American democracy.”

In “The Gospel of Relaxation,” James applies psychological insights to everyday concerns. Limit introspection: don’t become a prisoner of morbid feelings. To feel brave, act brave. To become cheerful, smile and laugh. A calm mind requires a sound body. The key to vitality is tennis, skating, bicycling, and, above all, healthy habits. James the Harvard scientist becomes a pioneer of the secular sermon and the upbeat self-help manual promising ways to gain control of our lives, the forerunner of 45,000 self-help books now in print.

In these popular essays, James revealed his ability to penetrate to the heart of a matter with a memorable phrase. What motivates men? “How to gain, how to keep, how to recover happiness is in fact for most men at all time the secret motive of all they do, and of all they are willing to endure.” Why go to college? “The best claim that a college education can possibly make . . . is this: that it should help you to know a good man when you see him.” In his rebuke of rationalists, he says, “Our emotions, our temperaments, and our current states of mind do affect our ideas. We cannot finally separate the thinker from the thought.” The purpose of life: “There is but one unconditional commandment, which is that we should seek incessantly, with fear and trembling, so to vote and to act as to bring about the very largest total universe of good which we can see.”

James not only urged personal transformation, but also spoke out against the evils of the day: alcoholism, lynching, racism, and, above all, war. “History is a bath of blood,” he wrote in 1910. The Spanish-American War of 1898 had disillusioned him. The invasion of the Philippines that followed appalled him and inspired a famous essay distributed to millions of readers, “The Moral Equivalent of War.” James accepted, as a convert to evolutionary psychology, that pugnacity, pride, and patriotism were innate; but he argued that aggression could be rechanneled and that civilian conscription might replace military conscription. Privileged youth could fight nature instead of nations, could serve the community, and could find romance in fishing fleets and freight cars. “The martial type of character can be bred without war.”

In 1898 James climbed Mount Marcy, New York State’s highest peak, and strained his heart. He never recovered his health. Despite his physical deterioration, he continued to work and, during the next eleven years, wrote the two classics, Varieties and Pragmatism. Freud, who met James in 1909, said he hoped to be as fearless as James “in the face of approaching death.” James died a year later, and his passing was noted in newspapers all over America.

William James reminds us “a philosophy is the expression of a man’s intimate character.” After his death, Henry wrote that he would miss his brother’s “inexhaustible company . . . originality, the whole unspeakably vivid and beautiful presence of him.” James left behind hundreds of letters to family, students, and fellow academics. They reveal an attractive personality: spontaneous, witty, playful, humane, tolerant, and public-spirited. He was a man who turned his neuroses into accomplishment.

William James took philosophy out of the academy and into the street. In memorable sentences, he made philosophy useful to ordinary citizens who wished to understand their minds and to improve their lives. He turned psychology into a science, inventing the notion of “stream of consciousness,” suggesting the brain was a dynamic, vital organ. He popularized pragmatism, a particularly American way of problem solving, useful to policymakers and ordinary citizens today. He legitimized religious belief, bringing solace to an America perplexed by Darwinism. To Americans plagued by nervous exhaustion, he preached energy, action, and optimism. And in the early years of the twentieth century, he wrote stinging denunciations of imperialism, trying to explain and extirpate human violence and aggression in a world drifting toward catastrophe.

William James: Short Biography

William James, philosopher and psychologist, was instrumental in establishing Harvard’s psychology department, which at its inception was tied to the department of philosophy. James himself remained unconvinced that psychology was in fact a distinct discipline, writing in his 1892 survey of the field, Psychology: Briefer Course, ‘This is no science; it is only the hope of a science’ (p. 335). Despite James’s skepticism, in the ensuing century this hope was fully realized in the department he helped to found.

Initially trained in painting, James abandoned the arts and enrolled in Harvard in 1861 to study chemistry and anatomy. During an extended stay in Germany after graduating, James developed an interest in studying the mind, as well as the body. In 1872 James was recruited by Harvard’s new, reformer president, Charles Eliot, to teach vertebrate physiology. In 1875 James taught one of the university’s first courses in psychology, “The Relations between Physiology and Psychology,” for which he established the first experimental psychology demonstration laboratory. James oversaw Harvard’s first doctorate in psychology, earned by G. Stanley Hall in 1878. Hall noted that James’s course was, “up to the present time the only course in the country where students can be made familiar with the methods and results of recent German researches in physiological psychology” (Hall, 1879).

James’s laboratory research on sensation and perception was conducted in the first half of his career. His belief in the connection between mind and body led him to develop what has become known as the James-Lange Theory of emotion, which posits that human experience of emotion arises from physiological changes in response to external events. Inspired by evolutionary theory, James’s theoretical perspective on psychology came to be known as functionalism, which sought causal relationships between internal states and external behaviors.

In 1890 James published a highly influential, two-volume synthesis and summary of psychology, Principles of Psychology. The books were widely read in North America and Europe, gaining attention and praise from Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung in Vienna. James then moved away from experimental psychology to produce more philosophical works (he is credited as one of the founders of the school of American Pragmatism), although he continued to teach psychology until he retired from Harvard in 1907.

James profoundly inspired and shaped the thinking of his students, many of whom (including Hall, Mary Whiton Calkins, and E.L. Thorndike) went on to have prominent careers in psychology. He also advised an undergraduate project on automatic writing by Gertrude Stein. William James is listed as number 14 on the American Psychological Association’s list of the 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century.

William James and the Inner Side of Religion

William James (1842-1910), Harvard professor of psychology and philosophy, is considered one of the pioneers of the psychology of religion. For James, religion is a deeply subjective phenomenon and not the acceptance of theological teachings.

“While I was in general depression about my future, I was suddenly overcome by a terrible existential anxiety. The image of an epileptic that I had seen in the asylum appeared in my mind’s eye”, reported the psychologist William James during a lecture at the Scottish University in Edinburgh.

“I felt such revulsion and at the same time felt my momentary difference so clearly, as if something that had been solid within me was slipping away and I became a quivering heap of fear. After this experience, the universe was completely different for me.”

At this point in time, 1901, William James is considered the most important psychologist of his time. In 1890 he laid the foundations of modern, scientific psychology with his extensive work, the ‘Principles of Psychology’.

His lectures in Edinburgh were entitled ‘On the Diversity of Religious Experience’. James himself was not a particularly religious person. In 1904 he wrote in a letter: “I have no living feeling of an intercourse with God. I envy those who have one as I know it would help me immeasurably. For my active life, the divine is limited to abstract concepts, which interest and influence me as ideals, but they do so only feebly compared to a sense of God if I had one.”

William James was born in New York in 1842. His grandfather, an Orthodox Presbyterian, had immigrated to the United States from Ireland in 1789 and had become wealthy through real estate deals. Relieved of all economic worries, William’s father made sure that his children received a first-class international education. William and his younger brother Henry, who later became a famous novelist, attended schools in London, Paris, Bolzano and Bonn.

From 1864 William James studied medicine at Harvard. During a stay in Germany in 1867, he attended lectures by the famous physicist and physiologist Hermann von Helmholtz in Berlin. From 1872 James taught himself at Harvard, first physiology, later psychology and philosophy.

Along with the logician and philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce, William James is considered the founder of pragmatism. This is a philosophy for which truth does not consist in the correspondence of a statement with reality. From a pragmatic point of view, truth means that a thought or statement is true if it is useful for human action. True from a pragmatist perspective is what works.

William James:”Truth’, to put it briefly, is nothing other than that which brings us forward along the path of thought.’

And for religion this means: “Pragmatism expands the field in which one can seek God. … Pragmatism is ready for anything, it follows logic or the senses and accepts even the most humble and personal experience. He would also accept mystical experiences if they had practical implications.”

Not surprisingly, James’s lectures on the diversity of religious experience are not about beliefs. Rather, James is looking for a common pattern underlying religious experiences—regardless of religious beliefs. For James, religion is what remains as an emotion in the individual if one disregards the external tenets and rituals of religion.

‘Religion means the feelings, actions, and experiences of individuals who believe themselves to be related to the divine.’

This notion of religion as a private, inner event is strongly influenced by the Protestant culture of piety in which James grew up. He also makes a momentous methodological decision that has brought him strong criticism, especially from colleagues:

in his investigations he concentrates on religious geniuses, as James calls them. By this he means people with unusually intense religious experiences.

By restricting himself to personalities such as Martin Luther, Ignatius of Loyola, Teresa of Avila or John Wesley, the founder of Methodism, James narrows the picture of religious experience. Derived from the biographies of these so-called religious geniuses, for James, religious experiences are always connected with intense experiences of crises, an existential psychological emergency that radically questions his previous life.

In doing so, James ignores all positive or unspectacular forms of religious experience – such as the feeling of deep security or a self-confident piety rooted in religious traditions.

One reason for this one-sided methodological approach is the American religious culture. Which, as was made clear in the case of former President George W. Bush, is strongly influenced by the idea of ​​a ‘born again’, a rebirth. So the idea of ​​finding faith and God through a personal crisis and thus also spiritual and moral renewal.

Religious experience needs no institutions and no theological teachings. On the contrary. For James, organizations and belief traditions erode religious sentiment, making it empty and abstract. The Tübingen theologian and James editor Eilert Herms:

‘The ‘religious experience’ reveals what is originally about religion: namely, an event in the most intimate layer of personal self-awareness, an event that affects the immediacy of self-awareness.’

As the Protestant theologian Friedrich Schleiermacher also localized William James Religion in Feeling. Feelings, however, are private and individual. Thus, for James, the defining feature of religion is the religious feeling of the individual and not the acceptance of sacred scriptures and theological doctrines.

“If we survey the totality of religion, we discover a great variety of dominant ideas; but the feelings on the one hand and the behavior on the other are almost always the same; for Stoic, Christian and Buddhist saints are practically indistinguishable in their way of life.”

Accordingly, mystical experiences mark the core of religious feeling for him. For such experiences, according to James, are characterized by breaking down all the ordinary barriers between the individual and the absolute. The mystic feels one with the Absolute, but at the same time he is aware of this state.

The mystical experience thus opens up access to a subconscious self.

The subconscious self, which James also calls the ‘further self’, is not to be confused with Sigmund Freud’s unconscious, which is primarily a system of repressed and warded off instinctual content. For James, the subconscious encompasses all mental processes that we are not conscious of, whether they are the result of our personal development or our physical condition. Eilert Herms:

“The individual self owes itself to preconscious life processes that exclude it from the wider self. This surrender of the individual self to preconscious life processes is fundamental and absolute.”

For James, the preconscious is the condition of religious experience. Only the expanded self releases the energies to enable the religious experiences of the conscious self. In the case of the great figures in religious history in particular, such as Buddha, Paul or Mohammed, the boundary between the conscious and the preconscious self was extremely permeable. Only this permeability made possible the revelations, visions and enlightenments that made them charismatic founders of religions.

William James: “From what we have seen, it seems to me that the door to this region seems unusually wide open for deeply religious people; in any case, experiences that came through this gate have subsequently shaped the history of religion.”

Since religion for James is shaped exclusively by individual, private experiences, it can never be wrong or reduced to a few aspects. For James, both official church representatives and prominent critics of religion therefore work with a false concept of religion.

They appeared in book form just weeks after James had completed his Edinburgh lectures and were a smash hit. By the time James died in 1910, 18 editions had appeared.

The first German edition appeared in 1907. At the same time, however, independent religious-psychological approaches emerged in Germany, with which one proceeded methodologically differently than William James.

Analytical Overview of the Legacy of William James

Evolution

Evolution was emphasized in the late 1800s which one of the biggest theories there was at the time was social Darwinism. Darwin’s famous theory was intended to explain biological diversity and a specie’s ability to adapt to its environment. And while his theory has been a staple of science ever since its first publication, the theory of evolution has had a far greater impact on the larger society and culture than just the study of biology. The impact that Darwinism had on philosophy were less dramatic, but in the end, were more significant.

In 1859, Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species was published and in the 1870s, it began to have an impact on society. Darwin’s theory of evolution began to influence the opinion of others in the United States where the nature of evolution sought that there will be a sort of inevitable progress that would be controlled by natural selection. Natural selection is the process whereby organisms are adapted to any environment they are in as well as to survive and produce more offspring. This seemed “eminently reasonable to most Americans, for it fitted well with their own experiences.” Henry O. Havemeyer stated that “You cannot wet-nurse people from the time they are born until the time they die. They have to wade and get stuck, and that is the way men are educated.” William Graham Sumner, a Yale professor taught his undergrads with the survival of the fittest analogy. “Professor,” one of Sumner’s students asked him, “don’t you believe in any government aid to industries?” Sumner said “No!” “It’s root, hog, or die.” His student followed up with another question, “Suppose some professor of political science came along and took your job away from you. Wouldn’t you be sore?” Sumner responded with “Any other professor is welcome to try,” “If he gets my job, it is my fault. My business is to teach the subject so well that no one can take the job away from me.” Sumner’s argument of the survival of the fittest analogy started to become known as social Darwinism. If you were the fittest, you will always survive if they are allowed to their capacities to their potential without any limitations. Except, Americans despise governments that had too much power and controlled a strict regulation of the economy, but the Americans didn’t mean that they opposed every government activity regarding economics. Banking laws, tariffs, internal-improvement legislation, and the granting of public land to railroads are only the most obvious of the economic regulations enforced in the nineteenth century by both the federal government and the states. Americans didn’t see any difference between government activities of this type and the free enterprise philosophy, the purpose of these laws were to release energy and as an effect, increase the area of freedom that someone could operate at. Tariffs raised the interest in the industry and as a result, created new jobs, railroad grants began opening up for new and different regions for development, and more. Industries were huge and financial organizations were growing as well as the complexity relations regarding economics in which scared people, but also made them greedy for more goods and services society was turning out to be some sort of greed.

Regarding philosophy, Darwinism wasn’t so dramatic, but it ended up being more significant. William James was educated in London, Paris, Bonn, and Geneva, He was also at Harvard where he studied painting, participated in a zoological expedition to South America, graduated with a medical degree, and eventually became a professor at Harvard at the end, he was successful of comparative anatomy, psychology, and philosophy. His Principles of Psychology which was published in 1890 said that it established discipline as one of the modern sciences.

James also published Varieties of Religious Experience in 1902, the point of view of the subject regarding psychology and philosophy helped many readers restore their faith religiously with their better understanding of psychology and the physical universe. James was the most influential philosopher of his time, he used his imagination and verve as a writer and ultimately came to the conclusion to reject Darwinism and he would prove or explain why he did reject Darwinism, “all other one-idea explanations of existence.” He continued to say that the environment might influence survival, but the environment also influences the desire to survive. William James’s argument was known as pragmatism, pragmatism is an approach that tests the truth of theories or beliefs regarding how successful their practical application is. The mind, James wrote in a typically vivid phrase, has “a vote” in determining truth. Since people were religious, religion was in fact, true, at least in his argument of assessing the truth. Ultimately, the pragmatic approach had inspired the majority of the reform spirit in the late 19th century and continued through the early 20th century. James’s hammer blows shattered the laissez-faire extremism of Herbert Spencer.

In the Great Men and Their Environment which was published in 1880, William James argued that social changes came about by what geniuses did in which society had chose and were raised to positions that gave them power rather than by the force of the environment around them. This reasoning had fit the expectation of rugged individualists, but it had encouraged those who were not satisfied with society and how they had to work for change. John Dewey and other educational reformers, the institutionalist school of economists, settlement house workers, and others acquired pragmatism eagerly. Thanks to William James, his philosophy did much to resurrect the optimism that shaped the reform movement during the pre-Civil War, but pragmatism ended up bringing Americans face-to-face with somber problems. Relativism made the Americans optimistic, but it also created insecurity with it. No one could be sure of anything, there wasn’t any comforting dependency on any eternal value because of the absence of the truth.

Pragmatism also suggested that at the end, there will be a justification of the means, that whatever worked would end up being more important than what anyone could have thought of it to be. William James died in 1910 and during that time of his death, the Commercial and Financial Chronicle pointed out that the pragmatic philosophy helped businessmen make decisions. Since they were emphasizing practice and disregarding theory, there was a new philosophy that encouraged materialism, anti-intellectualism, and other aspects of the American character that wasn’t pleasant. Perhaps pragmatism created a dependency on the free will of human beings that resulted in them ignoring their capacity for selfishness and self-delusion.

Originally, Chauncey Wright, who is secretary of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences said “Nothing justifies the development of abstract principles but their utility in enlarging our concrete knowledge of nature,” and that’s where William James further developed the philosophy further. Even in society, media such as magazines were less concerned on anything intellectual like how Darwinism impacted law, sociology, and anthropology for example The theories of John Dewey and the progressive educators, realism in art and literature, and how pragmatism was implicated to psychology, philosophy, and theology. The media rather talked about sports like college football since it was powerful regarding culture.

Josiah Strong applied the “survival of the fittest” analogy to justify American expansion. Before the United States expanded towards the Pacific, they had a treaty with Hawaii in 1875. A reciprocity treaty with Hawaii was enacted in 1875 that meant that Hawaiian sugar would be imported to the United States for free for a promise to acquire no territory to a foreign power. In 1887, the treaty was renewed in which the United States obtained the right to establish a naval base at Pearl Harbor. In addition, after the United States occupied Midway, America obtained some land in the Samoan Islands in the South Pacific. During the 1890s, America intensely grew interested in acquiring land towards the Pacific. The reason why is because the conditions in Hawaii influenced the Americans more and more. The McKinley Tariff Act of 1890 discontinued raw sugar as well as compensating American producers of cane and beet sugar by giving Americans two cents a pound. It struck Hawaiian sugar growers hard because it had destroyed the advantage they had in the reciprocity treaty.

Introductory Essay to Philosophy: William James and William Clifford

Luke Skywalker, the protagonist and hero in the “Star Wars” franchise, is nearing the target on the Deathstar to save a planet from mass destruction, but hears a voice from his dead friend, Obi-Wan Kenobi, instructing him to use the force. Conflicted between turning off the tracking computer on the basis of faith or keep the tracking computer on, Luke consults William James and William Clifford. Both of them are known as famous philosophers but have a position regarding faith on completely opposite sides of the spectrum. Where James agrees with faith after running it through certain criteria, Clifford on the other hand states that faith should never be relied on without sufficient evidence. Within this paper, I will address both Clifford’s and James’ positions more in-depth and why they hold said positions. Furthermore, whether either philosopher provides proper reasoning as to why they reject the opposition.

William Clifford and William James have conflicting thoughts regarding the belief of religious faith. Mr. James’ belief in faith is pragmatic, as he believes that it is morally justified if it is beneficial to oneself. The belief in question must then be “intellectually undecidable” and must constitute a “genuine option”. This means that the answer must not be immediately there and whether the option for a said answer is living, forced, or momentous. William James holds his view on religious faith due to when a genuine option arises, using intellectual evidence alone is unprofitable. Thus, when consulting Luke Skywalker, William James would say to turn off the tracking computer as it follows the criteria of being “intellectually undecidable” and a “genuine option”.

On contrary to William James’ pragmatic belief on faith, William Clifford believes in evidentialism. Being an evidentialist, Mr. Clifford’s main criteria to go on the belief of religious faith is that there must be sufficient evidence in order to act on said faith. William Clifford goes with this thought process because he believes that the premise of belief is morally wrong as it affects those around you. As you continually follow faith without evidence, you will then spread and alter the system of faith that is currently out there. Therefore, William Clifford would advise Luke Skywalker to leave the tracking computer on due to Luke not having sufficient evidence on whether the voice that is “speaking to him” is actually his dead friend or just a figment of his imagination due to high stress, and whether the force can work better than the technology that is currently in front of him.

Both of these famous philosophers have several reasons for rejecting their counterparts. William Clifford counter William James’ pragmatic belief as believing in faith because it seems to be beneficial in the future is not considered a genuine belief. He then emphasizes this by giving an example regarding a ship owner having conflicting thoughts regarding his ship, but brushes it off because they believe it is in good condition. On the other hand, William James opposes Clifford’s thoughts regarding pragmatism by stating that those who constantly try to find evidence for a belief will be in a continual predicament of suspense and will never arrive at a true belief. But in my genuine opinion, Luke Skywalker should turn the tracking computer off as he saw firsthand what the force does from Obi-Wan Kenobi (the voice that Luke hears while piloting the X-Wing) and Darth Vader, giving him sufficient evidence before the mission that the force is more than a religious belief.

Granville Stanley Hall and William James: Analytical Essay

Abstract

Granville Stanley Hall was considered a prophet of science, psychology, and youth. He was eager and well-equipped to share his views on psychology and how he believed it could change and revive education and religion. Hall originally set out to become a minister but was far too interested in literature and philosophy. He pursued his education and was able to teach and give lectures on philosophy and pedagogy both of which he was remarkable at. When he heard about psychology as a branch of philosophy, he was excited by the “new scientific psychology” offered by William James at Harvard and became the first person to get his doctorate under the new field of psychology. Hall started implementing psychology into his lectures and went on to organize the new field, set up a lab, the American Journal of Psychology, and the American Psychological Association where he served as the first President. Hall went on to become the president of Clark University where he directed his attention to a child study movement involving the questionnaire method and unveiled his book Adolescence bringing to light his genetic psychology. Hall brought many distinguished guests to Clark to speak and with an appreciation of Sigmund Freud’s work invited him to speak which brought him to the United States for the first time to lecture on psychoanalysis. Good end? Citation??

A Glimpse into G. Stanley Hall

From Farm to Philosophy

Granville Stanley Hall was said to be born on February 1844 on his parent’s farm in Ashfield, Massachusetts. Although he did use the name G. Stanley Hall or Granville he was mostly known as Stanley throughout his life. Both his father (Granville Bascon Hall) and his mother (Abigail Beals) demonstrated strong beliefs in education and religion (Parry,2006). Since his father was mostly stern, he turned to his gentler mother for consolation. Due to hostility between him and his father, Hall developed a high ambition “to do something in the world”. Hall was not interested enough in farm work but quickly grew a passion for literary and artistic activities where he could have an outlet for his imagination. With his early love of literature in his teens, he started an autobiography, had a journal, wrote poems and stories, and fantasized himself speaking in front of large audiences. He was a founder of music overwriting at one point because it allowed him to express his emotions and escape the farm. He ultimately realized he did not have enough talent for the piano so the fantasy of being a great pianist stayed with him throughout his life. Ultimately, his parent’s traditional ways urged him to pursue higher education and become a minister (Ross, 1972, p.12).

Hall left his family farm to pursue his education about 30 miles away at Williams College in 1867 (Parry,2006). This endeavor caused him pain and he instantly felt his peers were more knowledgeable than him and that the material was difficult (Ross, 1972, p.15). Soon after starting college, he wrote home stating he experienced a religious conversion. Although religion seemed to lift his spirits and give him confidence, he found intellectual and social activities far more interesting at college. His classes no longer became challenging and he became involved in almost every extracurricular activity offered (Ross, 1972, p.18).

As Hall approached his senior year, he could take courses in philosophy and literature. Hall explored different aspects of philosophy with guidance from his professors which led him to narrow his focus to philosophy over literature because he felt it better matched his talents. Hall was invested in the idea of intellectual creativity but still unsure of his future before he graduated from Williams College in 1867 (at age twenty-three) where he was able to finish sixth in a class of forty-three (Ross, 1972, p.15).

Since graduate school in the field of philosophy did not seem to exist, Hall set out on the path of getting his education in ministry. Hall enrolled in Union Theological Seminary where he took classes and taught school during the summer for a source of income (Ross, 1972, p.31). Hall strongly considered studying abroad in Germany but knew he or his family could not afford it. He had heard great things about studying there and looked up to a fellow seminarian George S. Morris who encouraged his philosophical ambitions and had just returned from studying abroad when they met. Hall stumbled upon the opportunity to study in Germany where he told his parents he was studying theology when he was exploring philosophy. Hall loved Germany and wished he had the financial means to stay longer but ultimately knew that he wanted to become a professor of philosophy (Ross, 1972, p.42).

Hall returned to the United States to finish his last year at Union Seminary and went on to be a pastor at a church but soon after decided to leave (Parry,2006). Due to abandoning his religious orthodoxy, it became hard for Hall to secure a teaching position in philosophy. He soon was contacted by a young scholar he met in Germany, James K. Hosmer who was looking to leave his spot teaching rhetoric and English at Antioch College and recommended him for the spot. He was also aware that James’ father was the president looking to retire which could eventually land him a spot teaching philosophy (Ross, 1972, p.49).

[bookmark: _Hlk6689111]Hall taught at Antioch College from 1872 to 1876 where he earned an excellent reputation teaching literature and mental philosophy. He was exposed to psychology as a field of philosophy, but in 1870 and 1872 when the second edition of Spencer’s Principles of Psychology surfaced, he began introducing psychology into his lectures. Then when he heard about William Wundt’s Grundzuge der physiologischen Psychologie he was enthusiastic (Ross, 1972, p.59). Hall was now faced with a decision to leave Antioch due to not having enough philosophy students to keep him busy. With his future uncertain again, he decided to leave and without new teaching, assignment decided to go to Harvard to hear lectures pending his decision to go back to Germany (Ross, 1972, p.61).

When Hall arrived in 1976, Harvard University was distinct from other universities because of their philosophy department that offered “new scientific psychology” by the assistant physiology professor, William James. James was able to convince Harvard to let him teach physiological psychology where it became the only university in the country it was taught. He also managed to secure his friend H.P. Bowditch’s physiology laboratory for his students to do research (Ross, 1972, p.59). Harvard was also in the process of providing a Ph.D. program. These opportunities along with William James’ faith in the development of physiology and psychology convinced Hall to stay and continue his education at Harvard.

Psychology unfolded

Hall did most of his work at Harvard with William James and very much looked up to him just as he had done with George Morris. The freshness of psychology with the idea of the scientific method attracted Hall’s creativity, intellectual work, and self-development (Ross,1972, p.72). Hall’s theory on color vision was published and his work was considered ingenious and changed him into a scholar. In 1878, Hall passed an oral examination awarding him the first doctorate in philosophy in the new subject of Psychology. This was the first doctorate awarded by Harvard’s philosophy department and the first doctorate in the field of psychology ever awarded in the country (Ross,1972, p.79).

Even with Hall’s advanced degree, finding a position in the new field of psychology was not going to be easy. Hall was itching to go back to Germany because his friends mentioned: that “scientific psychology” was growing there. With no luck, Hall headed back to Germany where he planned to study physiology and psychology in Berlin. He would find Hermann von Helmholtz lecturing and Emil du Bois-Reymond’s new physiological institute. He would also go to Leipzig and find the country’s well-known physiologist Carl Ludwig and the forerunner of the new field of psychology, Wilhelm Wundt, and his new experimental laboratory. Hall was more focused on the scientific aspect of psychology and the study of education and was hopeful to bring all the possibilities to light when he returned to the United States in 1880 (Ross,1972, p.103).

Hall was a major part of organizing the new field of psychology when he returned to the United States. He was able to lecture at Harvard University on psychology and pedagogy. The lectures became so successful he gave similar lectures at John Hopkins University. He even set up a small lab where he found four students: James McKeen Cattell, Joseph Jastrow, E.M. Hartell, and John Dewey interested in “new psychology” and they became the first to engage in research (Ross, 1972, p.134). In 1884, Hall was given his first secure position at John Hopkins becoming the first chair of the new field of psychology in the country. He continued his profession as a professor of psychology and pedagogy and described new psychology in three divisions: the study of instinct, experimental psychology, and historical psychology (Ross, 1972, p.153).

In 1887, Hall unveiled the American Journal of Psychology which he intended for not only his fellow colleagues but to define the field in general. Although the idea of Hall’s “scientific psychology” was controversial, he exclusively wanted empirical studies and excluded any introspective and theoretical psychology. Philosophy could be included if it was intended for the purpose of using as data for psychological studies (Ross, 1972, p.171).

With John Hopkin’s psychology department still new and not financially stable enough for Hall to stay, he moved on and became the first president of Clark University in 1888 and was important in developing psychology as a profession (Ross, 1972, p.179). Hall brought with him some of his best students: Donaldson, Sanford, and Burnham who went on to do significant work in their fields of psychology. Hall began to broaden scientific psychology with others looking upon. Hall’s work at Clark could become a rival to William James’s work at Harvard which motivated them to establish a laboratory.

In 1892, Hall was credited with starting the American Psychological Association and served as its first president (Parry,2006). Hall sent out at least twenty-six invitations to people interested in the new psychology such as William James, John Dewey, Josiah Royce, and many more whether Hall had different views personally or intellectually (Ross, 1972, p.182-183). The Association went from having 31 members to 74 a few years later to having 127 in 1900. Hall granted 9 doctorates in psychology and by 1897, there were more doctorates in psychology than any other field in science besides chemistry (Ross, 1972, p.184).

Hall promoted education reform in an original way by studying children. He had first attempted the child study movement back in 1882 and even published his study in 1883 called the Contents of the Children’s Minds and it was instantaneously successful to reform education based on children’s nature. Hall was overwhelmed with the variety of material he had collected from his studies and realized they posed more questions then answers and put in on hold in 1885.

Hall continued his child study movement in the 1890s and flourished interest with his lectures on higher pedagogy and psychology (Ross, 1972, p.281). Hall was able to gain students, joint chairs of psychology and pedagogy, and professors to join into his child study movement. Hall continued to lecture to win over the public and he spoke with sincerity and ensured that child study was to benefit the teachers first and only then for the purpose of science. Hall focused his research on the nature of the child and obtained his large amounts of information from teachers and mothers through his questionnaire method. Between 1894 to 1915, he had sent out 194 questionnaires on his various topics of child study (Ross, 1972, p.291).

After his various child studies, Hall directed his attention to early adolescence. In 1904, Hall published a two-volume study: Adolescence: Its Psychology and Its Relation to Physiology, Anthropology, Sociology, Sex, Crime, Religion, and Education (Parry, 2006). It expressed his ideal education program in detail, an in-depth description of adolescence, and his idea of genetic psychology. Hall’s genetic psychology consisted of infancy to senescence and psychopathology, and he also included theories from Sigmund Freud (Ross, 1972, p.381).

Perhaps one of the last things Hall is known for is for bringing Sigmund Freud to the United States. Freud strengthened some of Hall’s own ideas about trauma in early adolescence, repression, and emotional catharsis. With the anniversary of the founding of Clark University coming up, Hall was looking for intellectual leaders to bring in to speak at their conference. It was proposed by the faculty to bring in Herman Ebbinghaus and Ernst Meumann but Hall went off on his own to invite Sigmund Freud and eventually Carl Gustav Jung who was known for his association tests. In 1909, both Freud and Jung gave lectures at Clark University which turned out to be the biggest conference held. They spoke to distinguished guests and were honored for their work for the first time in the world (Ross, 1972, p.388).

Hall’s Legacy —-Need a better title

After Granville Stanley Hall received the first doctorate in psychology, he did the hard work of organizing psychology in the United States and without him it would have taken a much longer time for it to emerge as a professional field. He influenced psychology and urged the profession to be more scientific and used in practical applications such as education reform and transforming religion (Ross, 1972, p.421).

Even before Hall’s time as president of Clark University, he had secured a laboratory that inspired early research from his students. This led to other universities and William James to follow suit and also lead to his child study movement which may not have panned out the way he had planned but it inspired progressive education, child development, educational psychology, clinical psychology, school hygiene, and mental testing that exists in some form today (Ross,1972, p.367).

His childhood dreams of speaking in front of large audiences came true as he gave impeccable lectures that inspired the public. He spoke passionately about psychology and education throughout his career to parents, teachers, educators, psychologists, and practically anyone that would listen (Ross, 1972, p.xiv). His lectures led to him securing teaching positions that allowed him to spread his knowledge and securing the future of psychology for the United States by awarding doctorates in the field.

Hall’s distinguished positions not only allowed him to spread his knowledge but allowed him to bring intellectuals such as Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung to the United States and bring forth their ideas that would lead psychology forward. Hall furthered his new psychology by creating the American Journal of Psychology for research to be shared and the American Psychological Association both of which still exist today. Hall’s mark on psychology may be overlooked but is made prominent by his boldness, ambition, and his ability to shed light on important ideas and bring forth psychology and future subfields to the United States.

References

  1. Ross, D. (1972). G. Stanley Hall: The psychologist as a prophet. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  2. Parry M. (2006). G. Stanley Hall: psychologist and early gerontologist. American journal of public health, 96(7), 1161. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.090647