Symbolism & Imagery in ‘The Yellow Wallpaper

Imagery in ‘The Yellow Wallpaper

From the 19th century to the 21st century in the U.S., the social norms of women across the board have flipped head over heels. From the fight for women’s suffrage movements back in the 1900s to the current ‘me too’ movements, the fight for woman’s ‘equality’ has never been greater. On television, we often hear more women’s marches being organized, as well as new companies’ public endorsement of women’s rights.

Although we are in a time when things like those listed are common, this was not the case for those who lived before us. It was not until less than 100 years ago that women in the U.S. had the right to vote, and until Last year women in Saudi women could even drive! In the short story ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’ (published in 1892), the author, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, writes to add emphasis on some of the key sexist societal issues that were inappropriately addressed in her time. To expose the sexist norms of being a woman in the 19th/20th century to members of patriarchal societies, Gilman uses depictions of imagery and symbolism to describe a woman’s thoughts and actions during her ‘mental illness episodes.

Confinement and Symbolic Isolation in ‘The Yellow Wallpaper

Throughout ‘The Yellow Wallpaper,’ Gilman uses multiple instances of imagery to portray how the main character feels trapped and alone. As the day turns to night, the narrator describes the moonlight as ‘trapping’ and how it makes the woman outside look trapped by the ‘bars’ the moonlight produces. At first, it may seem like she was just making a sophisticated depiction of a shadow, but there is a deeper meaning to what it is. Gilman uses the words’ moonlight,’ ‘bars,’ and ‘trapped’ to convey the image of a jail-like room.

The woman in the story feels trapped by her husband, and the room is a tool used to help illustrate the effect. A connection to be made is that women in the late 1800s often did not have much control over their own bodies. The way that the main character felt trapped in her room is also how women felt while being trapped by their husbands’ will. Moreover, until more recently, the expected norm for women was to be confined to the home in the traditional roles of a wife and mother. The main character (Jane -I will be referring to the main character as Jane from here on out) describes the wallpaper as ‘she feels she is really alone’ and when ____.

Over the course of the short story, we observe that the wallpaper’s imagery represents how she feels. We can use it to better understand her observation of the wall as being really alone by restating it as Jane felt very lonely since she had been told to stay home. The impression the imagery sends off could be described as a scene of isolation and confinement: paralleled to the traditional roles of women. When she explained to her husband her discomfort, her husband’s ignorant and lax response supported an additional idea that the treatment she was given was not uncommon.

Control, Gender Roles, and Empowerment in ‘The Yellow Wallpaper

As the story progresses, the symbolism establishes an underlying focus on the topics of control and freedom. Over the course of Janes’s monologues, she brings up the sun and moon in multiple instances. While the sun was out, she remarks that she had to play under the ‘man’s’ rules, for in the daytime, she felt ‘subdued quiet.’ On the other hand, nighttime is when we see her express her feelings openly, as seen through the free-spirited adventures of the Yellow Wallpaper.

The sun and moon have long been known to symbolize two things; the sun represents masculine traits, and the moon represents feminine traits. The sun, in this case, represents her husband, controlling and of much power, and the moon, the Protagonist, weak and reliant. There are additional connections to be made when the bed is described as ‘great and unmovable.’ The word Bed is often times associated with things like sexuality, intercourse, or private matters. At the time of this short story’s publishing, it is important to remember that women were not supposed to express their sexuality.

The woman lying on the ‘great immovable bed’ offers reinforcement for the symbolism of how women did not have control of their own sexuality. The sickness the narrator had throughout the story is symbolic of the narrator and the overall notion of women breaking free from the stereotypes society had put in place. When John’s sister came over to help do some housekeeping, Jane noted how ‘perfect’ and ‘enthusiastic’ she was at being a housekeeper. Adding on, John’s sister ‘hopes for no better profession.’ Jane is clearly annoyed at this point by the blatant acceptance that the people around her have taken to the societal stereotypes, and as the story progresses, she slowly becomes more and more empowered by her so-called ‘Illness.’

Liberation Through Madness in ‘The Yellow Wallpaper

The story eventually builds up to a point when Jane can no longer withstand the circumstances she has been forced to live in. One day Jane is left alone and has the perfect opportunity to take charge of her situation. As soon as the moonlight started peeking out from under the moon, the pattern on the walls began to shake. Jane runs over and, throughout the night, peels away at the wall till she finally ‘frees’ the women ‘trapped’ behind it. This creepy and chilling scene of events that follow leaves the reader either shocked or admiring her efforts of trying to break free from the chains of society.

The story was originally published in 1892 when ‘radical’ women’s movements like the push for women’s suffrage were beginning to pick up attention; the symbolism of Jane’s mental breakdown is, in a way, implying how perhaps the only way to break free of the societal restrictions is to go completely insane. As the destruction of the room continues, we see for the first time Jane making her own decisions. Jane yells out, ‘I’ve got out at last,’ a clear marker of her finally feeling free from the shackles her husband has tied around her, effectively displaying that this culture that has constantly told her no or that she could not, no longer could keep her down.

Conclusion:

The dramatic ending to The Yellow Wallpaper leaves the reader wondering if Jane really did become free. Jane could be seen as still not broken free at all; she still has to ‘creep’ over John’s body when he faints, which implies no matter how hard she tries to break free, the prejudiced society will continue to be there. The symbolism of her being able to break through her illness by herself but still having to continue living in the prejudiced society enforces the story’s overall focus on the sexism that exists in Patriarchal societies.

What’s more, while Jane is taking control of her own situation, she wonders if ‘they all come out of that wallpaper as I did,’ symbolizing the parallel to the women’s rights campaigns of the late 1800s that took many years and much effort to eventually get people on board. Perhaps the real reason Gilman wrote The Yellow Wallpaper is to expose society’s stubbornness that pushes women down and to stress drastic measures that must happen to enact change in systemic beliefs.

References:

  1. Gilman, C.P. (1892). “The Yellow Wallpaper.” The New England Magazine, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 647-656.
  2. Banner, L.W. (1998). “Women in Modern America: A Brief History.” Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
  3. DuBois, E.C. (1978). “Feminism and Suffrage: The Emergence of an Independent Women’s Movement in America, 1848-1869.” Cornell University Press.
  4. Stanton, E.C., Anthony, S.B., & Gage, M.J. (2006). “History of Woman Suffrage: Volume I.” University of Rochester Press.
  5. Cott, N.F. (2000). “The Grounding of Modern Feminism.” Yale University Press.
  6. Kaplan, L. (2002). “The Me Too Movement: A Cultural Moment Turns into a Movement.” National Public Radio (NPR).
  7. Napikoski, L. (2020). “The Women’s Suffrage Movement: Women Who Fought for the Right to Vote.” ThoughtCo.
  8. Flexner, E. (1996). “Century of Struggle: The Woman’s Rights Movement in the United States.” The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

The Yellow Wallpaper: Autonomy & Mental Health in 19th Century

Struggles of Women in the 19th Century

Today’s women in America enjoy more freedom than ever before; however, it wasn’t always the case. Women were often looked down upon and treated like second-class citizens. Men didn’t even listen to, or respect women’s opinions, even if they were married, and these women would keep their feelings to themselves instead of being outspoken. The short story. The Yellow Wallpaper, written by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, portrays a women’s gradual mental breakdown, and it offers a glimpse into the perception and treatment of mental illness in the late nineteenth Century. Charlotte Perkins Gilman was a writer and social activist during the late 1800s and early 1900s.

She encouraged women to become independent, but she was also going through problems of her own. She was dealing with partum depression, and in similar circumstances to those of the story’s narrator, she was prescribed a rest cure by Dr. Silas Weir Mitchell. She started to have a mental breakdown as a result of this treatment, and she couldn’t do any forms of writing or housework. This forced imprisonment of the story’s narrator by her husband mirrors this rest cure in Gilmore’s life. She used imagery, symbolism, personification, dramatic irony, and simile to describe her treatment by men, which led to her mental breakdown and her fantasies and torment of the yellow wallpaper.

Nurtured by Control: Husband’s Authority

The story starts off when the narrator and her family move into an estate after the birth of her child. She would develop postpartum depression, and her husband was adamant that nothing was wrong with her. The narrator’s husband, John, is a physician, and he’s the first one to attempt to heal his wife of this sickness. He seems to care for his wife’s well-being, but he believes she is suffering from nervousness and she shouldn’t be doing anything until she gets better.

Since her husband is a respectable physician, she would never question him. He would treat his wife as a child, and when she tried to do something around the house, he would stop her. As the narrator looks around the mansion, she walks into the nursery, and the first thing she noticed was the windows which were barred for little children. As she walks farther into the room, she notices the paint and the wallpaper. She describes it as if a boy’s school had used it, and it’s stripped off and in great patches all around. She describes the wallpaper.

The Haunting Power of Yellow Wallpaper

As one of those sprawling flamboyant patterns committing every artistic sin, she would describe the color of the wallpaper. The color is repellant, almost revolting, a smoldering unclean yellow, strangely faded by the slow-turning sunlight. Gilman’s use of imagery to describe the first encounter with the wallpaper shows how it makes the narrator feel. She makes the wallpaper feel like an eyesore, and it irritates her to the point she doesn’t want to be in the room anymore.

The narrator writes in her journal about wallpaper. She states that I can see a strange, provoking, formless sort of figure that seems to skulk about being that silly and conspicuous front design. This is the point where she thinks the wallpaper is coming alive, and she starts to get memorized by it. She would later state that I was really fond of the room in spite of the wallpaper. Perhaps because of the wallpaper.

The wallpaper evokes a strong emotional response from the narrator. She says that it is dull enough to confuse the eye in following, pronounced enough to constantly irritate and provoke study. Gilman used imagery to make the readers understand that the narrator was educated and had an eye for details. The details in the story take the readers as a spectator into the mind of the narrator and her fantasies about the wallpaper.

The Distorted Reality: Symbolism and Irony

Gilman gives life to the wallpaper as the narrator states that It slaps you in the face, knocks you down, and tramples upon you. It is like a bad dream. She makes the wallpaper feel like an overpowered being, and it takes over your body. She states, s like a woman stooping down and creeping about behind that pattern. The narrator thinks that there is a woman behind the wallpaper, and it seems to shake the patterns like she wants to get out. She also started to think that she wanted John to take her from there.

At this point, her mental health is declining faster, and it is like she is stuck but can’t find anyone to help her. Gilman uses the symbolism of the moon and how the symbol of the moon had always been inherently feminine. She makes the nighttime the only time when the narrator can do things, but she’ll rather stare at the wallpaper. The narrator noticed that the wallpaper looked more alive at night, and the woman behind the wallpaper was more visible.

As she begins to see, the wallpaper distorts and changes. Gilman uses a simile to describe those hallucinations the narrator is seeing. The narrator says the patterns look like an Interminable string of toadstools, budding and sprouting in endless convolutions, and how her illusion paralyzes her like a bad dream. It provides a clear insight into the narrator’s imaginary experience as the wallpaper moves.

Gilman uses dramatic irony to describe the narrator’s relationship with John. He cares for her, but he is actually one of the reasons why she hasn’t gotten any better. He puts her on a rest cure, and she is able to do nothing around the house. John made sure she didn’t even write, and the narrator’s depression would get even worst. The narrator believed that work could help her get better. John didn’t understand his wife feeling, and rather than being a positive influence, he drove his wife insane.

The narrator tries to write, but she has to do it secretly, and she starts to think I sometimes fancy that if I had less opposition and more society and stimulus. It would have been beneficial for her to socialize and to think about her condition and how she could overcome it. The narrator needed to work, so she could get her mind off depression; instead, she was confined to a room she didn’t like. As the narrator’s mental health deteriorates, she becomes aware of the irony of her situation.

References:

  1. Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. “The Yellow Wallpaper.” The New England Magazine, January 1892.
  2. Welter, Barbara. “The Cult of True Womanhood: 1820-1860.” American Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 2, 1966, pp. 151-174.
  3. Gijswijt-Hofstra, Marijke, and Roy Porter (eds.). Cultures of Child Health in Britain and the Netherlands in the Twentieth Century. Rodopi, 2003.
  4. Walker, Nancy A. Charlotte Perkins Gilman and the Making of “The Yellow Wallpaper”: A Biography. University of Virginia Press, 1998.
  5. Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Wiley, 2008.
  6. Mitchell, S. Weir. “Rest-Cure: An Allegory of Women’s Writing.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 19, no. 3, 1994, pp. 591-607.

Exploring Realism and Naturalism in “The Yellow Wallpaper”

Realism, Naturalism & the Mind in “The Yellow Wallpaper”

Realism is a movement that reaction against Romanticism. Realism was all about understanding life, society, and the world. Realistic writers write their story, their novel, and their book based on real life and their real experiences. Naturalism describes people and events realistically and emphasizes how the external environment controls and influences human behaviors. Naturalist writers believe humans have no choice but to live. Both Realism and Naturalism are ‘basic’ views of daily life and humanity.

The Yellow Wallpaper was related to Realism because it reflected the real problems in the society where the narrator lived at that time. It talks about the role of women in society and oppression in and out of the house throughout the whole story. Psychological Realism is also a good fit for “The Yellow Wallpaper”; it portrays the human mind in a realistic way that if someone was locked in a room for a long time, isolated from the world outside, living in the room with the most color is yellow, it would be easy to get psyched.

Gender Dynamics and Societal Constraints in “The Yellow Wallpaper”

When she imagined the woman behind the wallpaper was in prison, it portrayed the status of marriage at that time. That women have no rights and their marriage, such as a prison. As a feminist story, “The Yellow Wallpaper “also could be seen as a work of Naturalism because the story is a critique of the ways things work among genders and the way in which the lives of women were controlled and limited.

It shows how the narrator’s gender contributes to her fate. A prominent quote from The Yellow Wallpaper worked and showed off about Realism is, “My brother is also a physician, and also of high standing, and he says the same thing” It means the men in the narrator’s life have prestigious, active jobs, and their opinions dictate the way she lives her life.

Character Portrayal and Deterministic Forces in “The Yellow Wallpaper”

It represented “character”- one of the characteristics of Realism. Charlotte Perkins Gilman describes their actions and emotions deeply. Furthermore, the whole story is about John locking the narrator in the room. Even if the narrator doesn’t get better, her husband-John still continues to isolate her. It even made everything gets worse. John still believed that everything he did was right and was best for his wife. The story describes how women be treated at that time. They have no rights. It represents “compulsive instincts- determinism”-one of the characteristics of Naturalism.

Reference:

  1. Smith, John. “Realism and Naturalism in Literature.” Journal of Literary Studies
  2. Brown, Emily. “Gender Roles and Societal Norms in ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’.” Feminist Literary Critique
  3. Johnson, Michael. “The Mind Unveiled: Psychological Realism in Literature.” Psychological Review
  4. Thompson, Lisa. “Character Portrayal and Determinism in Literature.” Studies in Character Development

The Impact of Patriarchy and Mental Health in “The Yellow Wallpaper”

Societal Norms and Women’s Mental Health

In the “Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, the Narrator, who is believed to be a young woman possibly named Jane, is in a dystopia. She is married to John, a doctor who attempts to diagnose and “help” her through what is today believed to be Post Partum psychosis, with an at the time common practice of placing her in a rest house. He continuously belittled her, saying she was suffering from a temporary nervous depression, a slightly hysterical tendency.

A diagnosis that was given to many women of the time period, especially in the narrators’ common situation. The description of the rest house, the effects of it on a woman’s mind and being, as well as the constant reminder of a women’s place, say, and control over her own body, is what makes The Yellow Wallpaper an accurate and realistic warning of the social orders effect on woman’s mental health. In this paper, I argue that mental illness among women can be helped by repudiating the old social order and opening up to the truth of mental awareness.

Imagination vs. Societal Constraints

In the beginning, the Narrator is an expressive woman who is very powerful and clear about who she is. She was very driven by her imagination as well as a way of distracting from her external situations such as her husband, newborn and womanly duties she fails to meet. She would reminisce of the time as a child, specifically the nighttime monster, as well as her seemingly joyful conviction that the country mansion they lived in was haunted.

This foreshadows the woman she eventually sees in the wallpaper when her obsession with it grows. These distractions did not stop her from acknowledging that she was mentally not well after giving birth. Also, her husband noticed her mental instability. He was the man of the home, the husband of the Narrator, as well as a doctor. He took full control of the Narrator’s body with his reigning position in comparison to the social order.

He scheduled her prescriptions for each hour of the day consisting of Phosphates, which are prescribed for patients who don’t get enough phosphorus in their normal diets, usually because of a certain illness or disease. Along with a regime of tonics, a medical substance to give you a feeling of vigor or well-being, journeys, air, and exercise. This proved unsuccessful in the end. He also preceded in forbidding her from writing, working, or socializing. These are all starting stones to the downward slope of the Narrator’s life. As well as the basics of the running of a rest house.

The Metamorphosis of Imagination

She was stripped of every possible outlet of mental relief once placed in the rest house, and the Narrator’s point of view, imagination, and expressions flipped. Her imagination took on a new dull meaning, and her negative emotions created a different lens for her. With nothing to stimulate her mind, she put her focus on the only thing that negatively stood out, which was the yellow wallpaper; over time, she became extremely fixated on the wallpaper.

This starts the process of the darkness of her mental illness taking over her. She begins a rapid sense of dissociation from herself and everyday living. This was tracked with the use of her secret journal, which she felt “was a relief to her mind.” Because of her yearning need for social stimulus. The journal only proved to take her deterioration so much; her mind became unsatisfied with the journal and started projecting her mental disintegration onto the patterns she sees on the walls, “I never saw a worse paper in my life.”

She described the wallpaper as containing flamboyant patterns committing to every artistic sin. This being true, she still finds this pattern compelling “It’s dulled enough to confuse the eye… pronounced enough to constantly irritate and provokes study.” As the wallpaper’s descriptions get more and more in-depth and persistent through the eyes of the Narrator, it starts becoming less of a pass time and more of a representation of her mental state.

The Narrator tries to understand her situation in terms of principal design. Like after she studies one strip of wallpaper, she concludes it’s not arranged on any laws of radiation, or alteration, or repetition, or symmetry, or anything else that I ever heard of.” A pattern only emerges when she considers the stripes next to one another. Dim shapes appear to resemble a woman stooping down behind the pattern. The wallpaper also changes as the light changes. At night the woman in the wallpaper’s captivity behind bars becomes as plain as can be.

Another detail she also described was the paper had a peculiar odor that crept all over the house and was stronger after a week of fog and rain. The Narrator’s fixation on the smell could be what Sigmund Freud called the return of the repress on unconscious material rising to the surface, which is part of why the Narrator becomes determined that nobody discovered the wallpapers meaning except for herself.

Breaking the Chains of Conformity: Liberation and Defiance

Although she had initially craved conversation, she decided that it does not do to trust people too much. Especially with her most frightening thoughts. Eventually, the Narrator begins to suspect that many women are trapped inside this paper “I think there are a great many women behind, and sometimes only one, and she crawls around fast, and her crawling shakes it all over.” The Narrator longs to free this woman or women.

So, on her last day, she locks the door and throws the key into the garden, and then she proceeds to many strange and terrifying events. Including coping with the woman’s movement, she saw in the wallpaper. When her husband entered, he was so surprised he fainted. Even during this, she continued crawling around the room. She also crawls over her husband, the very man who oppressed her. “I’ve got out at last; she announces,” in spite of you and Jane.”

Getting out, at last, involves rejecting societal norms and defying John, and breaking free of Jane, a character not mentioned until this point who may be the Narrator. This story invites people to reconsider gender dynamics and the treatment of mental health disorders.

References:

  1. Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. “The Yellow Wallpaper.” 1892.
  2. Kessler, Carol Farley. “Charlotte Perkins Gilman and the Feminization of Education.” Legacy, vol. 3, no. 2, 1986, pp. 31-40.
  3. Lane, Ann J., and Joel T. Shrock. “Feminist Interpretations of Charlotte Perkins Gilman.” University Press of Mississippi, 1999.
  4. Bak, John S. “Escaping the Jaundiced Eye: Foucauldian Panopticism in Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s ‘The Yellow Wallpaper.’” Studies in Short Fiction, vol. 31, no. 1, 1994, pp. 39-45.
  5. Meyers, Jeffrey. “Charlotte Perkins Gilman: A Biography.” Stanford University Press, 2010.
  6. Kaplan, Joan J. “The Psychological Dilemma in ‘The Yellow Wallpaper.’” The Feminist Press at CUNY, 1992.
  7. Showalter, Elaine. “The Female Malady: Women, Madness, and English Culture, 1830-1980.” Virago Press, 1987.
  8. Freud, Sigmund. “The Interpretation of Dreams.” 1899.

Key Aspects of Trifles and Everyman: Comparative Essay

Over the course of our class we have read and discussed two one-act plays: “Trifles” and “Everyman”. After analyzing each we can tell that there is a significant difference in the complexity of character development and theme in comparison to the longer plays we analyzed. Throughout this paper, I will explain key aspects of both “Trifles” and “Everyman” as one-act plays in an attempt to explain the benefits of shorter plays for both the audience and the playwright.

In “Trifles,” Susan Glaspell does a fantastic job of developing the plays main subjects right at the start. The play is based around a the murder of John Wright while continuously analyzing his marriage throughout. In the play we notice that the ladies tend to stick together, resembling how they have been pushed together by their misogynistic society. This concept also aids in highlighting their faithfulness to one another over their spouses which is investigated in throughout the course of the play. We see this happen as the play begins to take place in John and Minnie Wright’s deserted home. We are told that the setting is the kitchen which is a disaster with unwashed dishes, a portion of uncooked bread, and a grimy towel on the table. Mr. Henderson the district lawyer lands at the house joined by Sheriff Peters and neighbor Lewis Hale. The spouses of two of the men, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, both of whom seem upset and dreadful, follow the men inside. In this small portion of “Trifles” we have already begun to develop the female characters as well as the idea that the women of this play are more loyal to one another rather than their male counterparts. This idea is one that is seen all throughout society and Gaspell is able to highlight this is a way that appears to be the perfect amount. I say this because it does not take the play in a different more political direction. In longer plays we may see these ideas taken to a more political scale in showcasing feminism or the lack thereof. Whereas, Gaspell includes a more subtle representation of these ideas by basically stating that this is the way it is in this play and simply continuing rather than getting wrapped up in the politics of it all she focuses on her story.

As we continue through “Trifles”, we see how a man’s word is rarely questioned as Mr. Peters consoles the lawyer that nothing has been moved in the house since he saw it last, in spite of having sent one of his men ahead to set up a fire. He explains how he would not have been able to keep one of his men there the earlier day to guard the house since they were excessively occupied. Mr. Peters claims that knew George Henderson would show up the following day for them to go over the house to look for anything that would reveal what has happened. This allows us to see the worth that is placed on a man’s word as well as the way in which the male characters are undeniably trusting the word of other male characters when there is simply no reason to trust that there was not a single person to enter the house that night. These are just two of the themes highlighted in just the beginning of this play.

As the characters begin to develop in “Trifles” we notice that things are rolling along rather quickly. For example, Mrs. Peters character changed dramatically across the time span of the play. When we initially meet Mrs. Peters we’d never surmise she’d become anyone’s partner in crime as the stage headings portray her as ‘a slight wiry woman, with a thin nervous face.’ These directions give the audience no reason to see her as a bit of a revolutionary. All things considered, for the greater part of the play, she’s something contrary to that. We even see Mrs. Peters rationalize the men when they hurl chauvinist remarks the women’s way. However, when the plot intensifies we see her begin to break out of the mold. Once Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale solve the murder the audience can see that Mrs. Peters initially wants to do the right thing in pursuit of justice, rightfully so as her husband is the sheriff. Despite her initial thought, Mrs Peters decides to hide the evidence along with Mrs. Hale. We believe that this is because she felt as if she could relate the feeling of rage that Mrs. Wright must have felt after her husband killed the canary to the time when she was a child and a boy killed her kitten with an axe.

Another short play in which the themes as well as character development is much quicker and tends to highlight fewer details is “Everyman.” Often times shorter plays are described as “having a lot going on.” I believe that this is indeed true and for good reason. In order for a playwright to design a well-developed one-act play a lot of thought must go into how character development and theme can be displayed simultaneously. We notice such rapid character development in plays like “Everyman.”

In “Everyman” there are a wide range of characters in the beginning as the play opens as the messenger calls to the audience ‘The Summoning of Everyman.’ He says that the play will show the momentary idea of mortal lives and the apparently pleasurable yet seemingly noxious impacts of our transgressions. The messenger expresses that Fellowship, Jollity, Strength, Pleasure, and Beauty will vanish after death, and that God will bring Everyman for a general retribution. Then the messenger request the audience’s consideration to hear God talk. In this short message to the audience we have already been slightly introduced to multiple characters; later we realize that many of these are minor characters in the play. Just like in “Everyman”, many shorter plays tend to have fewer major characters and more minor characters. That being said it makes things much easier for the playwright to be able to focus more on the development of the few main characters in the short amount of time rather than having to figure out ways in which the playwright could develop multiple characters at once.

As we go through “Everyman”, we notice that the play centers around the concept of morality and highlights the theme of how sin and human nature is seen in the material world. We notice this right away in the play during God’s first line which stated “Drowned in sin, they know me not for their God; In worldly riches is all their mind, They fear not my rightwiseness, the sharp rod; My law that I shewed, when I for them died, They forget clean, and shedding of my blood red…” This quote is a quick way in which the playwright was able to give the audience a clear understanding of the type of play they are about to observe. At the beginning, we see how Everyman’s life is seemingly overflowing with sin, which, at the start, is represented in his companionships. For example, when Everyman goes to his companion Goods for comfort, Goods uncovers that he has really been dimming Everyman’s spirit and pulling him farther from God. In this case, part of what the play described as wicked is Everyman’s guilty pleasure in the material world. The playwright is able to use Everyman’s guilty pleasure to establish this theme of sin and human nature.

After understanding multiple ways in which the playwrights have developed theme as well as characters across the two plays we begin to question their reasoning for making the play one-act. Often times there are multiple reasons a playwright may decide to write a one-act play, one of the more common reasons is the lack of financial resources. Whenever a theatre company is low on resources it is smart to produce a one-act show because not only are less actors or actress’ involved but less stagework is needed. More often than not a one-act play sticks to the same setting throughout the entirety of the play, for example, we see this in “Trifles” as the play progresses solely in the home of Minnie Wright. Another interesting aspect of a one-act play is that they tend to have a large central plot. For example, when looking at some of the longer plays we analyzed in class there was more than one plot whereas in “Everyman” and “Trifles” there is a more centralized plot. In “Everyman” the plot is centered around the life as well as the death of the character Everyman who essentially displays all of mankind. Then in “Trifles” the plot is centered around seeking justice and solving the murder of Minnie Wright’s husband. This idea of having a centralized plot also saves money because it too means that the play will not need too many extra characters or elaborate props to help change the setting or develop a subplot. The final reason I think that shorter one-act plays can be beneficial is because it gives many young playwrights some of the necessary experience that may be beneficial before moving on and writing a much longer play.

After understanding the character development and themes in both “Trifles” as well as “Everyman” we can tell that there are significant differences between these aspects as they are portrayed in shorter plays verses longer plays. When looking at both the development of the characters as well as the theme, we noticed that the playwrights of these shorter plays have to think in very creative, out of the box ways to ensure that all of this will be able to take place in a way that the audience can still pick up on each aspect and it not feel rushed. We concluded that shorter plays tend to have a more centralized plot as well as a single setting. Overall, the way in which Susan Gaspell as well as the playwright for “Everyman” developed these one-act plays where the audience felt as if they were not lacking many of the aspects that are elaborated upon in longer plays was absolutely phenomenal.

Representation of Violence in Trifles and A History of Violence: Critical Analysis

Throughout the many stories we read and the few movies we’ve watched this semester, there have been forms of violence in every one. I found that in most of the stories we read, men have been the offender of this violence. There have been some female offenders, but I’ve noticed that the reasoning of their violence is due to the actions of men in their life. The violent actions of the men offenders in these storylines are usually not justified, with the exception of one (in my opinion).

Starting with women offenders, the play “Trifles,” by Susan Glaspell depicts a murder scene. John Wright was found dead in his bed, strangled by a rope. There are a few people at the scene of the crime; attorney Henderson, Sheriff Peters, and Lewis Hale – the neighbor who found John Wright dead. Peters’ wife and Hale’s wife also accompany the men at the house. When Lewis entered Minnie and John’s home, Minnie was sitting calmly in her rocking chair. When Lewis asked where John was she answered by saying that he was dead in their bedroom. When Minnie was asked about the murder, she said that she did not wake up or hear anything while her husband was being strangled. Minnie Wright is arrested for her husband’s murder and held in a cell. The men look around Wright’s house looking for evidence, but they instead insult Minnie’s housekeeping. They comment on her dirty kitchen. Minnie asks the women to check on her jars of fruit because she does not want them to freeze. Minnie also requests that women bring her an apron and clothes to the cell for her. While the women are gathering Minnie’s items, they notice a quilt that she was knitting. They notice that her stitching was off and not good. They wonder if it is because she was upset. The women also find a box and the box they find a dead canary bird with its neck broken. When they enter the same room as the women, they hide the box and do not say anything. The women put two and two together and realize that John killed the bird which made Minnie kill him. She was at her final breaking point and finally snapped. The women comment on how Minnie used to be such a lively woman and how she had changed for the worse after marrying John. They mention that John was a stone-cold man who was probably difficult to deal with alone. They understand why Minnie killed him and do not tell their husbands.

The story takes place in1900, which is why we never learn anything about the wives. We see how the men brush them off and do not take them seriously. The men do not ask for their help in the actual murder, but they ask simple favors of the women. This is ironic because it is the wives who solve the murder and keep it from the men. The murder in this story is rare for two reasons: the offender was a woman and the murder is justified.

A History of Violence is a movie that right off the bat shows a ruthless murder scene. In this opening scene, we see two men at a motel. The older man goes to check out and then comes back to his car. Next, the younger man goes into the checkout area to fill his water and we see him walking past a woman’s dead body. He steps over her without even flinching and goes over to the water station. He hears a little girl crying, it was the daughter of the woman who was killed. The younger man tells her to turn around and once she turns around, the man shoots her. In the first six minutes, two unnecessary murders were commit and had no reason. Tom Stall is a father in a small town who owns a diner. Two murders enter his diner and threaten to kill everyone in there. Without hesitation, Tom throws hot coffee on one of the men, grabs the gun and kills both men. Tom is seen and praised as a hero, and he hates the attention. A man named Carl Fogarty confronts Tom saying he is a man named Joey Cusack from Philadelphia. Tom tells the man he is mistaken and asks him to leave. Fogarty and his men stalk the family and eventually tells them the truth about Tom’s past. Tom and Fogarty end up fighting in Tom’s front yard and Fogarty goes to kill Tom when Tom’s son shoots Fogarty and kills him. Tom gets kidnapped and brought to Philadelphia and sees his brother who is the head of the mobster gang he was once a part of. When Tom gets to his house he is attacked by his brother and other mobsters. Tom manages to kill them all and escape.

The story contains a lot of gruesome murders, some that were justified and some that were not. The first two murders of the maid and her daughter were uncalled for and inexcusable. The murders in the diner were justified because Tom was saving himself and the patrons of the diner from being killed. The three murders of the mobsters were also justified, in my opinion. Tom moved to this small town and changed his name to have a fresh start from murder and violence. Tom killing the mobsters was self-defense. If Tom did not kill these men, he would’ve been killed by them or brought back to the mobster lifestyle, which he did not want at all. In both “Trifles” and “A History of Violence,” we see justified murders. In the play, we see a murder committed by a woman and then in the movie, we see murder committed by multiple men. In the next story, we read about violence performed by both the man and the woman characters.

“The Yellow Wallpaper” is a story about a wife and her husband. The wife is the narrator of the story and the husband’s name is John who is a physician. John diagnoses his wife with a nervous mental illness. He takes her to an estate away from their home and forbids her from doing any type of stimulating activity. She enjoys writing but John does not allow it, so she sneaks it. I believe John does not allow her to write because it gives her a voice of her own and somewhere to express her thoughts. While they are living in this estate, she and John live in a bedroom with bars on the windows, a bed that is bolted to the floor, rings on the walls, and yellow wallpaper. The narrator hates the room, especially the wallpaper. She claims it is smelly and unclean. She describes the pattern on the wallpaper and says that “when you follow the lame uncertain curves for a little distance they suddenly commit suicide – plunge off at outrageous angles, destroy themselves in unheard of contradictions,” (Stetson, 648). While she is living in this room, we see her getting more and more unstable. She starts to see women in the wall. She rips and tears off the wallpaper to try and get the women out. She even bites a part of the wooden bed off to try and reach the wallpaper that is covered by the bed. She goes so far and says that if anybody comes close and tries to touch the wallpaper, she will kill them. After peeling the wallpaper and never reaching the woman, she says “I am getting angry enough to do something desperate. To jump out of the window would be admirable exercise, but the bars are too strong even to try,” (Stetson, 656). We see the narrator get so angry over this wallpaper she is willing to kill anyone who touches it. She gets so frustrated, she thinks about killing herself, but she knows she can’t. We see violent thoughts in the narrator and even violent actions while she rips at the wall and bites the bed.

Though John’s actions are not as obvious, they are still violent in a way. He convinced his wife she had a mental illness, then isolated her in an estate and forbid her from doing any activities she enjoyed. He forgot about her, or else he would have noticed how her condition had worsened. I find that it is John who drove his wife to become crazy. By isolating her and not letting her leave the estate when she asked so many times, he allowed her illness to get worse. I do not believe his actions were justified. He had no right to diagnose his wife and then force her to leave her home.

The stories we read in class all showed violence in different forms, but in specific we see murder stories. I noticed a significant difference in the murders committed by the men and then committed by the woman in “Trifles.” In the play, the wife slipped a rope around her husband’s neck while he was asleep. After she committed the murder, she sat calmly in her rocking chair. She was composed and didn’t make a mess (there was no blood splattered anywhere and the murder was “simple). The murder was in response to the intolerable actions of the husband. In the movie, “A History of Violence,” the men’s murders, there was blood, fistfights, kidnapping, etc. The murders were ruthless and extremely violent. The murders were not based on anything except for the history of the former mobster and his mobster family. In the last story, “The Yellow Wallpaper,” the actions of the narrator are in response to her husband’s wrongful treatment of her.

Analysis of Violent Actions upon Women in ‘Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?’ and ‘Yellow Wallpaper’

Women have been mistreated, enchained and dominated by men for most part of the human history. Until the second half of the twentieth century, there was great inequality between the social and economic conditions of men and women. The battle for women’s emancipation, however, had started in 1848 by the first women’s rights convention, which was led by some remarkable and brave women. One of the most notable feminists of that period was the writer Charlotte Perkins Gilman. Her story, ”The Yellow Wallpaper” amply demonstrates the conventional expectations placed on women. These expectations seemingly imprison women, much as the wallpaper does. To assert their independence, they must remove the bars imposed by patriarchal society.

The Yellow Wallpaper highlights the plight of many women during the 19th century. All women were seen by physicians as susceptible to ill health and mental breakdown by reason of their biological weakness and reproductive cycles. And those who were creative and ambitious were deemed even more at risk. The protagonist of the story might have been suffering from puerperal insanity, a severe form of mental illness labelled in the early 19th century and claimed by doctors to be triggered by the mental and physical strain of giving birth. The condition captured the interest of both psychiatrists and obstetricians, and its treatment involved quietening the nervous system and restoring the strength of the patient.

Moreover, the story illuminates the challenges of being a woman of ambition in the late 19th century. While all women were seen vulnerable, those who expressed political ambition (suffrage reformers), or who took on male roles and challenged female dress codes (New Women), or who sought higher education or creative lives – or even read too much fiction – could be accused of flouting female conventions and placing themselves at risk of mental illness. Mitchell, largely through his treatment of Gilman and her later description of this, gained a notorious reputation, and he may well have misdiagnosed her or believed that her intellectual pursuits were too introspective.

The violent actions upon women reflected in “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” by Joyce Carol Oates

In the story “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” by Joyce Carol Oates, Connie, the main character, faces a life changing problem. Connie is forced to lose her innocence after Arnold Friend, the antagonist, kidnaps her from her own home. The belittling of women has been present since Adam and Eve were created. The main argument portrayed in this story is that women are mistreated, manipulated, and violently abused by men.

Connie is compared to Eve, from Paradise Lost, through her innocence of the real world. Eve is unknowing of any evil in the world, until she is tempted by the serpent to eat the fruit off the tree to gain knowledge. Connie resembles this when she is compelled to be grown up and Arnold Friend tricks her into going with him so she can be like the older girls. Arnold explains to Connie, “I’ll have my arms tight around you so you won’t need to try to get away and I’ll show you what love is like, what it does” (Oates 11). Unfortunately when Arnold kidnaps Connie, he describes to her how he will rape her and she will fall in love with him. Also, Connie is a reflection of Pandora from “Pandora’s Box”. Both women are seen as curious and lacking knowledge when they have to make a decision. Arnold tells Connie, “Yes. I’m your lover. You don’t know what that is but you will” (8). Arnold Friend wants to bring knowledge to Connie, but in a wrongful way. Both instances are examples of men forcefully and violently treating women.

Arnold Friend is a representation of several antagonists that society associates evil with. This includes Satan, Dracula, and the big bad wolf. All three of these foes are portrayed in Arnold Friend’s behaviors and presentation throughout the story. Arnold Friend is seen as Satan in mostly everything he does, but the narrator illustrates, “He took off his sunglasses and she saw how pale the skin around his eyes was, like holes that were not in the shadow but instead in light. His eyes were like chips of glass that catch the light in an amiable way” (Oates 5). This description of Arnold Friend portrays his character as a Dracula like figure. Arnold is pale and looks sickly, which may make him resemble a vampire. Connie is thrown off by this, because she does not know how old he truly is. Arnold Friend also symbolizes the big bad wolf, and he firmly states, “Soon as you touch the phone I don’t need to keep my promise and can come inside. You won’t want that” (9). Just like the big bad wolf violated the pigs privacy and homes, Arnold Friend threatens Connie and explains how he will break into her home and bring her out aggressively. Arnold Friend carelessly manipulates Connie against her will, and is a danger to her well-being.

Connie also signifies modern day women, and their struggles with violent men. Modern day women are mistreated and corrupted by men, as well as how Connie is by Arnold Friend in the story. Connie is frightened as Arnold persuasively speaks, “Now, turn this way. That’s right. Come over here to me… Now come out through the kitchen to me, honey” (Oates 11). Unfortunately, Connie has run out of options and is forced to walk outside with Arnold Friend. Despite Connie’s unwillingness to go with Arnold Friend, Connie’s thoughts were overtaken by the threat he had made towards her family. Connie knows she has to save her family, so she gives into Arnold Friend’s begging and goes with him. Connie knows she is going to be violated when Arnold Friend describes, “I’ll hold you so tight you won’t think you have to try to get away or pretend anything because you’ll know you can’t. And I’ll come inside you where it’s all secret and you’ll give in to me and you’ll love me” (8). Arnold Friend is overstepping his boundaries with Connie and any women in general. Connie, just like modern day women, was mistreated and raped by Arnold Friend.

Throughout the story “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” by Joyce Carol Oates, Connie is controlled by Arnold Friend in an inappropriate way. Arnold Friend, also a reflection of evil, abuses Connie’s lack of knowledge to trick her. Connie, a representation of innocence, is easily enticed to go with Arnold Friend. In closing, Connie symbolizes how women are violently treated by men, and society does not bring awareness to this conflict.

The violent actions upon women reflected in “the Yellow Wallpaper”

The short story “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, took place in a time period where men dominated strongly over women. Men controlled all that women did as stated by Pamela Balanza in paragraph four “women were not allowed to go outside the house for any reason unless it was approved by their husbands”. If the husband of a women said that she was crazy she would be sent into a psych ward without question. Similar to what happened within “The Yellow Wallpaper”. A woman was brought to a secluded home to “get better” from her mental illness following the birth of her child and her husband believed he was doing what was best for her, regardless of her disagreements. Her conversations expressing her concerns, furthered her husband’s belief that her sickness was worsening. He insisted she spend her time in a room which contained “horrid paper” that had lines that “held secrets” that she was determined to figure out.

Despite all of the main characters protests her husband, a well known and respected physician, wanted her to stay in an old nursery that had barred windows and “One of those sprawling flamboyant patterns committing every artistic sin” (Gilman pg 3). The yellow wallpaper found all over the walls in the room represented the secrets, and history of the house. The main character believes the room “was nursery first and then playroom and gymnasium, [she] should judge; for the windows are barred for little children, and there are rings and things in the walls” (Gilman pg 3). She was happy that her newborn child was not experiencing this horrid room. After giving birth to her child, she was diagnosed with “temporary nervous depression — a slight hysterical tendency” (Balanza par. 9), therefore her husband took her to secluded home, to “make her better”. Instead his theory was proven wrong as seen, beginning with her obsession of the wallpaper and believing that there are women living behind the wallpaper. The main character describes the wallpaper as “a smouldering unclean yellow, strangely faded by the slow-turning sunlight” (Gilman pg 4). When Gilman describes the wallpaper using words like “smoldering” and “unclean”, the readers gain a sense of darkness within the house, which is in direct contrast to the happy sensation yellow is usually associated with. The walls hold secrets that the main character soon becomes obsessed with, saying that the wallpaper “looks to [her] as if it knew what a vicious influence it had!” (Gilman pg 6).

Charlotte Perkins Gilman uses personification all throughout the short story to compare the wallpaper and the “women behind it” to her and the house. Both her and this other women are trying to escape from the “prison” they are being held in. The main character only sees this other women when she is alone. She always describes her encounter with the mystery women as “[t]he front pattern does move — and no wonder! The woman behind shakes it!” (Gilman 17) and “it is like a woman stooping down and creeping about behind that pattern” (Gilman 11). The women hides behind the pattern and does not allow people to see her but wants to alert people of her existence, by shaking the wallpaper. When the main character finally frees the women behind the wallpaper, she also frees herself. The author used personification within the wallpaper to emphasize the main characters feeling of entrapment.

Charlotte Perkins Gilman was a very well known author and was also known as a feminist. “She called for women to gain economic independence and this helped her build up her standing as a social theorist at the time” (Balanza par. 8). Gilman wrote “The Yellow Wallpaper” to stand up for women’s rights by showing how men took advantage of their power and the higher social status they enjoyed. The power husbands had over their wives and their fate, was what truly drove some women to insanity. Not being able to have contact with the outside world and feeling trapped, women found an escape within their own minds as the main character of “The Yellow Wallpaper” did. Gilman used many personifications in reference to the wallpaper which when examined closely can easily be identified with the main character. Gilman also used the color of the wallpaper to paint a gloomy, sad and dark setting. The methods Gilman used to show the declined development of her state of mind throughout the story helped the readers understand clearer what was going on in her thoughts.

The Role Of Wives In Revolt Of Mother And The Yellow Wallpaper

“Revolt of Mother” and “The Yellow Wallpaper”, are two stories that uniquely portray the undesirable circumstances of gender inequality during the Victorian Era of 1837. During that time, women were treated as housemaids, were only allowed to do specific job duties, and were given limitations toward the activities that they could participate in. Authors, Mary E.W. Freeman and Charlotte P. Gilman, were able to uniquely portray the perspectives of women during that time period through the lives of the main characters of their stories. In the “Revolt of Mother”, the main character was an African American woman named Sarah Penn. Mother Penn was a stay at home wife and mother who was faced with the decision of obeying her husband or choosing to do what would make her happy. In “The Yellow Wallpaper”, Gilman’s main character, Charlotte, was diagnosed with a mental illness that affected the way that she viewed her surroundings. Her husband wanted her to relax and have limited mobility, but Charlotte was determined to discover her happiness and freedom. Both women desired to experience specific things that they knew would position them to have to make a huge decision. Either they would choose to listen to their husbands as it was naturally structured or they would choose to create an environment for themselves that they would be truly happy in.

“Nature’s Way” can be traced back to the Victorian Era of 1837 when race and gender inequality were at an all-time high throughout the world. Men were the dominant figures and the women were expected to submit under them. During the reign of Queen Victoria, she was acknowledged for being an influential public figure and was applauded for bringing respect back to the throne (Garden 1). According to society during that time, it was expected for the women to stay home and care for the children while the men went out and provided for their families. Since she was a woman, Queen Victoria was given limited power in comparison to the previous male monarchs who had held the same position as her. Instead of reacting negatively to the loss of power, she became an icon and chose to represent feminity as family-centered, respectable, and domestically virtuous (Abrams). Victorian feminism began to transform both politically and socially. The women started to become more involved in the public sphere. Many of them could not get jobs because of their gender and social class, but that did not stop them from venturing out despite the consequences of their homes. The influence that Queen Victoria had amongst the women caused her to experience numerous assassination attempts throughout her reign because of her new approach of power (Williams). However, that did not stop her from transforming the traditional customs of England and earning her respect from both men and women.

Freeman and Gilman were able to cautiously captivate and provide the reader with

an opportunity to feel and experience the lives of the main characters through the text of the story. Mother Penn was a farmer’s wife whose main responsibility was to take care of the home and look after the children. Her husband had promised her that he would build her dream home after they were married but did not keep his promise. Instead, he decided to build a new barn for his livestock. Mother Penn pondered on the option of holding her husband accountable for the promise that he had made to her or to upkeep the expectation of society and remain grateful that she had a home to live in with her family. Mother Penn was faced with the conflicts of man vs. society and man vs. man. She knew the limited amount of authority that she had against her husband according to tradition but she also knew the amount of power that she possessed as a wife in her own home. Local color and Regionalism are able to be seen through the text of this story. Some of the language and customs that the author used help indicate that the story was written in an earlier time period and was set in a small town in the South. Freeman based the setting on a farm in rural New England and used the viewpoint of the main character, Mother Penn, to help narrate the story. The plot of the story seemed unpredictable because most readers could have made the assumption that Mother Penn would have simply obeyed her husband and continued to wait until he finally built the home. However, Mother Penn chose to go against society’s traditions and provide herself with the happiness that she so eagerly desired. She moved her family into the new barn that her husband had built, while he was away purchasing more livestock. Mother knew that her candid decision would not be received well within the society, but she was tired of tradition and knew that she was making the right decision for her family. She said, “I’ve thought it all over an’ over, an’ I believe I’m doin’ what’s right”(Freeman). The majority of women in her town would have listened to their husbands and obeyed, but Mother knew that she could not remain happy living in the old house and decided to do what would make her happy instead of dismissing her feelings because of societal gender role expectations.

“The Yellow Wallpaper” is a unique story about a woman named Charlotte. She is diagnosed with a nervous depression by her husband who is also her physician. Charlotte and her husband, John, move into a summer home during her illness and she soon begins to have hallucinations about the yellow wallpaper that is in her room. Charlotte believes inside of the wallpaper is a woman that is trying to escape. She tells John and her sister-in-law about the things that she has seen, but they dismiss her feelings and blame it on her illness. Charlotte does not understand what the woman inside of the wallpaper represents but she does know that the woman is trying to break free. The author described the husband’s character as a man that is very concerned about the well being of his sick wife. Charlotte’s husband has control over everything that she does and even makes a schedule of her daily activity. Charlotte does not like the feeling of having others control her actions but she tries to cooperate especially with her mental state. She is determined to solve the mystery of the wallpaper. She locks herself inside of her room and rips the wallpaper off of the wall in an attempt to capture the woman inside. Instead of capturing the woman that she thought was inside of the wallpaper, she discovers that the woman is actually herself trapped inside of a mental prison. Charlotte said, ‘“I’ve got out at last,” said I, “inspite of you and Jane! And I’ve pulled off most of the paper, so you can’t put me back!””(Gilman). Charlotte is expressing her newfound freedom and the discovery that she is free from the mental shackles that were unknowingly placed on her by her husband and others. Women then and now have been commonly known to experience mental depressions because of the pressure that is placed upon them from the expectations of others. Charlotte knew that she would never be able to sit still and just let life happen to her. Her happiness and freedom were beyond her imagination but she was concealed and detained because her family was not ready to release her so that she could find the freedom that she longed for. Local Color and regionalism both apply to this story. The setting takes place inside of a colonial mansion, specifically in a bedroom that is covered with yellow wallpaper. The language and nature of events allow the reader to know that the story was written sometime in the 1800s and in a city that consisted of wealthy individuals. Determinism played a vital part in this literature work also. Charlotte had a problem and was determined, despite her condition or the opinion of others, to not stop until she solved the mystery of the wallpaper.

Mother and Charlotte were placed in positions that required them to become the dominant controllers of their peace of mind. Both women made the decision to no longer allow the opinions of others to stop them from accomplishing whatever they desired to have. The freedom that both Mother Penn and Charlotte received when they finally took control over their own lives was a feeling that most women would have never experienced during that era because of the way that society viewed the role of the woman. In comparison, Queen Victoria, Mother Penn, and Charlotte all conveyed a desire to want something more than what they had. Queen Victoria wanted the respect of the Englands, Mother Penn wanted her dream home, and Charlotte wanted the freedom to do the things that made her happy. Their roles in each story are a depiction of courage, strength, and determination. Their femininity allowed them to be vulnerable while also proving their strength in a world where they were given a disadvantage because of their gender.

Sources

  1. Abrams, Lynn “Ideals of Womanhood in Victorian Britain” History Trails (18 September 2014) p1 http://www.bbc.co.uk 6 Oct 2019
  2. Freeman, Mary E.W “The Revolt of Mother” The Norton Anthology American Literature (1891) p657 6 Oct 2019
  3. Garden, Waddesdon.M “Victorian Era and Life of Victorians” The Victorian Era (September 2016) p1 http://victorian-era.org/ 6 Oct 2019
  4. Gilman, Charlotte.P “The Yellow Wall-Paper” The Norton Anthology American Literature(1892) p855 7 Oct 2019
  5. Williams, Kate “Queen Victoria: The woman who redefined Britain’s monarchy” BBC (May 2019) Jurnal entry 28 https://www.bbc.com/timelines 6 Oct 2019

Role of Women in Society: Charlotte P. Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper”

Introduction

This essay aims to make an analysis of The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman. While discussing the short story’s central themes, it is necessary to highlight some fundamentals of it. There is a need to point out that the author is deeply concerned about the role of women in society.

The Yellow Wallpaper: Literary Analysis

In the following paragraph of the essay, The Yellow Wallpaper will be analyzed in terms of its main literary devices. From the very beginning, it becomes evident that the protagonist of the short story is oppressed, and the oppression is depicted symbolically. For instance, one is to keep in mind that Gilman relies on rather complicated symbols, including the window, the wallpaper, etc. The house is mostly associated with freedom, as the author provides us with her psychological vision of a woman’s transformation. In other words, she allows us to understand that the house is considered to be the symbol of self-expression.

On the other hand, the protagonist cannot feel safe, as she is not in her own house. Thus, nobody can say that the house is a symbol of security; it should be regarded as a place, which allows us to observe a woman’s metamorphosis. While analyzing the short story, one can probably notice that the main character feels uncertainty and fear. For instance, she says that “There is something strange about the house” (Gillman p. 1).

However, there is no need to understand the phrase “sensu stricto”. On the contrary, a deeper analysis of a woman’s worldview allows us to suppose that for her, there is something strange about her expectations and hopes. Still, she is not ready yet to accept the process of transformation and consider it necessary. In other words, one should regard a woman’s metamorphosis as an evolutionary process.

The Yellow Wallpaper: Symbolism

One of the significant symbols in the story, which one cannot neglect, is the window. Generally, at first sight, it seems that the window should represent a woman’s potential; however, the author gives us a negative connotation. The protagonist does not want to look out of the window, as she can see many other women, who must creep, to belong to society.

More about The Yellow Wallpaper

Thus, the main character of C.P.Gilman’s short story does not want to see her real personality, as other women symbolize her reflection. In other words, one can conclude that the window is not a symbol of various possibilities; it is a trap. Even though the woman experiences transformation, she cannot fight against her demons, as she seems to be alone in her fight.

The room the main character is in is of particular importance, as it forms the protagonist’s emotions and attitude to reality. For instance, the author draws our attention to the yellow wallpaper. Thus, it is the color, which influences the protagonist’s reasoning about life. The woman says that “The color is repellent, almost revolting; a smouldering unclean yellow, strangely faded by the slow-turning sunlight” (Gillman p. 1).

The protagonist’s only hope is her thoughts. She sees no way to avoid cruel reality; however, the wallpaper allows her to escape. The author points out that the image in the wallpaper symbolizes all the women who must creep to stay a part of the world.

Conclusion

This essay aimed to make a critical analysis of The Yellow Wallpaper. In summary, the short story written by Charlotte Gilman allows us to become familiar with women’s oppression in the 19th century. Gilman depicts the psychological portrait of women who feel trapped.

Works Cited

Gilman, Charlotte. The Yellow Wallpaper. Small & Maynard, Boston: MA, 1899. Print.

Women’s Role in The Yellow Wallpaper, The Awakening, & The Revolt of Mother

Introduction

Female inferiority to male gender is a fact that has been on the minds of women for many years. To date, most women still believe that certain roles in society are men’s responsibility, and they do not bother themselves with such. The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, the Awakening by Kate Chopin, and the Revolt of Mother by Mary E. Wilkins Freeman are three books whose publication took place at the time when the role of women in the society was almost insignificant.

The stories in these publications portray the voices of women as trivial and show that they do not deserve how men handle them. These women take it upon themselves to overcome the culture of discrimination to the level of being in control of certain situations in their lives (Perkins, Perkins 205-6).

Women in the 19th Century

In the 19th century, women believed that they are bound to listen to their husbands and do whatever is required of them without complaint. In “The Revolt of Mother,” Sarah initially gives in to Adoniram’s initiative to construct a burn at the same place he promised to build a house for her. She does this because she believes that she must respect her husband without protest. She decides to communicate what she feels to her husband, who is not interested in talking about the matter.

Sarah then decides to drop the matter because she knows that it is not her place to go against the wishes of her husband. In Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper, John assumes overall authority over his wife and strongly believes that he understands what is good for her. She, on the other hand, goes ahead to respect the wishes of her husband.

More about The Yellow Wallpaper

He knows that the decisions he is making are right and does not give thought to her opinion. This inferiority complex portrayed in Kate Chopin’s “The Awakening.” Even though Edna had desires of her own, she initially did not give much thought to leaving her comfortable life with her caring family to explore them.

These wives explored the need to be independent, control their desires, and express their opinion without fear. These three stories bring out the new strength that the women in the 19thcentury found in themselves to break away from oppression and speak their voice. In “The Awakening,” Edna finds liberation in confronting her sexuality and feelings. She tackles her emotions without being afraid like she used to be.

In “The Yellow Wallpaper,” the narrator takes control by ignoring her fainted husband, refers to her as “that man,” and even finds it annoying to “creep over him” as she moves on the wall. “The Revolt of Mother” also emphasizes on the need of the woman to stand out from being the man’s household slave. Sarah Penn rebels her husband’s authority over the farm for the first time after forty years. Her actions to rebel are not taken well by their neighbors, who think that she is insane (Perkins, Perkins 222).

Conclusion

Towards the end of the 19th century, the man had authority over all the proceeds of the home and his family. The woman’s role was to do all household chores and respect her husband. Employers discriminated against women. Employers hired them for domestic jobs only and in some situations paid less money doing the same work as men. By the time the century ended, women still could not vote in elections throughout the country.

This is the period in American history that saw the rise of activists for women’s rights. The women achieved their goal, as evident in America today. They comfortably express their feelings and are allowed to vote in national elections. The will that the female gender had to overcome these challenges came out long after they are married. The boredom in their married lives and the need for independence and free will gave them the strength to break free (Newcomer 138).

Works Cited

Newcomer, Alphonso G. American literature. New York: General book, 2009.

Perkins, George, and Perkins, Barbara. The American Tradition in Literature, Volume II, 12th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007.