The Man Who Was Almost a Man’: An Analysis of Richard Wright’s Book

“The Man Who Was Almost a Man” is a short story that chronicles the misfortunes of a teenage boy named Dave, and, unlike some of Wright’s darker stories, this text is a humorous satire. The texts welcomes its audience to come and laugh at Dave, who can easily be seen as a foolish character both by his actions and the literary elements of the story. Of course, this text is comical, but not without purpose. “The Man Who Was Almost a Man” is a mocking of the ideation of masculinity adopted by America during Wright’s life.

Dave’s goals in the story are very clear from the beginning; he wants to get a gun, assuming that the other men “would have to respect him” if he had one. However, the cruel and comedic irony of the story is that, at the end, he is in trouble with his parents and everyone is laughing at him, despite him owning this gun that he was sure was going to be good for his image and give him respect. Not only do the characters in the story find Dave foolish, but the audience is supposed to see him as a fool as well. Of course, neither the characters nor the audience think the gun within itself is funny and foolish, it is Dave’s actions that are humorous in the story.

Dave actions, are, too, ironic. Despite thinking he is now a man because he owns a gun (or is about to own a gun), he doesn’t act like one. In fact, it is arguable that Dave behaves more and more like a child as he progresses in his quest of manhood. Firstly, after inquiring about purchasing the gun, he goes home and asks his mother for the money. Masculinity, especially in Wright’s lifetime, included being financially independent and the financial leader of the household. Not only is Dave not able to use his own money, as it is being controlled by his parents, but he must ask his mother, a woman, for the resource. Even what he says doesn’t help with his childish image. He states, “Ma, ef yuh lemme buy one Ah’ll never ast yuh fer nothing no mo,” which is very commonly heard in desperate children. His mother exclaims the obvious, “Yuh ain nothing but a boy yit!” Dave seems to ignore this statement. He doesn’t verbally agree with his mother, but he doesn’t try to contradict her, either.

Perhaps Dave’s most childish action is trying to hide from his responsibilities, when a signal of one’s maturity and adulthood is accepting responsibility for your actions. Dave, without proper knowledge of how to use a gun, starts shooting it off and accidentally shoots the mule he’s working with, Jenny. Although he tries to fix the wound, she dies. Instead of explaining to his boss, Hawkins, what happened, Dave buries the gun and tries to lie about it. However, an older man explains it looks like a bullet hole, exposing Dave. Wright then writes, “Dave looked at Jenny’s stiff legs and began to cry,” another seemingly unmasculine action.

Dave further refuses responsibility by not paying back Hawkins for the mule. Instead, he takes the gun, runs away from home, and hops on a train. Now, the ending of this story may be interpreted differently depending on the reader. Many adults can recall trying to run away from home as children; it is just one of those things children tend to do. Therefore, they can interpret running away as another one of Dave’s childish antics. However, a younger reader may see the romantized writing of the ending and see Dave’s running away as a heroic and masculine deed, a push for independence. However, if one looks back at the text and applies logic, Dave’s plan wasn’t well thought out; Dave doesn’t mention knowing anybody in the place he is planning to go, so he has no human connections. He also doesn’t have any money or food. All he is carrying is his precious, but ultimately useless, gun, since he emptied the cartridge before hopping the train. Even if Dave ended up making money wherever he went, Dave never spent any of his own money; his mother took care of it knowing he wouldn’t invest it, such as buying new clothes for school. All in all, Dave doesn’t seem to have what it takes to go out on his own yet; he is still a child.

There is an overriding sense of dramatic irony in this piece that categorizes it as a satire, and the story can used and interpreted by different audiences as a whole because of this reason. Dave has a one track mind that keeps getting him into trouble; he thinks that just because he has a gun and a potential to be violent, he is automatically a man. An audience that better understands the multifaceted and complex idea that is masculinity can sit back and laugh at this foolish character. However, an audience that has a similar mindset to Dave can see his foolish actions and ambiguousbut-most-likely-unhappy ending and feel foolish within themselves. Here, they may be encouraged to change their mindset, seeing Dave’s story as a prophetic, cautionary tale. Wright’s purpose of the story was to not only entertain those who know more about life than Dave, but also inspire a younger generation to think about their manhood in terms greater than a handful of metal.

Theme of Respect by Others in The Horse Dealer’s Daughter and The Man Who Was Almost a Man: Critical Analysis

The primary concern of the writer of this paper is to evaluate the similar theme “Respect by Others” towards the protagonists of the two stories “The Horse Dealer’s Daughter” written by D.H. Laurence and “The Man Who Was Almost a Man” by Richard Wright first and second respectively.

The similarities of the both stories in respect to the theme “Respect by Others” are analyzed by using various story devices like plot, setting, character, irony, tone.

The essay discusses different aspects associated with the protagonists of both the considered stories. It further shows how Mabel and Dave proceeds with their life in order to earn “Respect by Others” in their life and reaches the most tragic phase of their lives by the end of the story.

In context to the first story it can be specified that the plots set by the author are contrasting. In the beginning the protagonist of the story is found to be unfortunate and nobody likes her and she is all alone as her father had died and left her in debt. However, by the end of the story it is found out that the protagonist, Mabel, gets a commitment for lifetime which makes her the most fortunate and develops a situation where people would respect Mabel. Moreover, in context to the second story, it can be said that the protagonist, Dave who was a boy wanted to be a man and gets freedom from racial hardship. To pursue his dreams, he purchased a gun and took several starts to prove his manliness in front of others and earn respect from others, especially whites by showing the possession of a gun.

Both the plots of the stories are developed in a way where the protagonists seek respect. In this way the theme of this essay, that is “Respect by Others” can be justified.

The following section discusses the setting of both the considered prose in respect to an example from the stories.

In the first story, the author has described the pond which is the turning point of the story as a “green, shallow, sodden hollow of fields, lay a square, deep pond” (Laurenc). It was in the falling afternoon when Mabel slowly got into the pond and Jack Fergusson, the doctor came to rescue her. Such a setting shows that Mabel, the protagonist of the story is discontented with her life, that she has never been valued and respected by others. At such a moment of realization she wanted to end up her life. this implies that due to lack of “Respect by Others”, the protagonist of the story intended to give up on her life. Contrary to this, in the second story, the author arranged a setting of the turning point of the story in an early morning, where Dave and Jenny were present in the field where Dave worked. Dave was to present his manliness in front of Jenny which unfortunately turns out to be a murder when the bullet of Dave’s gun shots Jenny by mistake (Wright 4). The protagonist of the story states “Know whut this is, Jenny? Naw, yuh wouldn know! Yuhs jusa ol mule! Anyhow, this is a gun, n it kin shoot, by Gawd!” when he got down the woods with Jenny. This phrase states that Dave, the protagonist to story tries to show his manliness in front of Jenny and earn respect from her. The setting further relates to the theme “Respect by Others”.

After the thorough analysis of both the stories, a significant similarity has been found out between the two protagonists. In this context, it can be stated both Mabel and Dave wanted recognition in life. Due to lack of importance respect and love, Mabel had decided to commit suicide. The story shows how a bull-dog faced woman turn into an assertive sexual woman when she meets Jack Ferguson. On the other hand, due to exploring his manliness and elevating respect towards himself by others, Dave had purchased a gun with $2. Therefore, with the help of a close analysis, it can be stated that in order to earn “Respect by Others”, both the protagonists of the stories had chosen a path of escape. The character of Dave represent that he is an immature boy who does not have the knowledge of the path to earn “Respect by Others” yet wants to earn “Respect by Others”.

From the keen analysis of both the stories two most important irony have been evident. In respect to the first story, it can be stated that the protagonist had a life which was meaningless. She found her life to be void and worthless. Soon when she was near to her death, she experienced her life changing moments. From death to a lifetime commitment, from ignorance to respect, the life of Mabel Pervin had changed completely. Similarly, in the second story, it has been evident that Dave who was a 17-year-old boy wanted to be a man and overcome the social structure where the blacks were always dominated by the whites. So, he thought of buying in order to break racial hardship. However, ironically his own plan backfires which causes him humiliation and represents his immaturity rather than his manliness.

An example from the first story is “I feel awful. I feel awful. I feel I’m horrible to you” (Laurenc). The tone of expression by the protagonist that exclaims that she is terrible and disgusting to the doctors as the doctor has no intention to love her yet she feels that she forcefully makes the doctor feel for her and love her. An example from the second story is “Quit hollerin at me! Whut’s wrong wid yuh? Yuh crazy?” (Wright 2). The tone of the expression is that Dave is asking his other to stop checking on him as he is adult enough to handle a gun.

This paper helps in concluding the similarities and dissimilarities of both the stories by the application of story devices.