I need a 300 word discussion post as well as two 200 word responses.
Discussion Post: Describe the concept and intent behind fusion centers and explain what you consider to be the primary benefits offered to the homeland security enterprise. Provide examples of associated programs and projects currently associated with intelligence and information sharing at the federal, state, or local level.
Response #1 (Brandon): Fusion centers are essential hubs where various government, law enforcement, and private sector partners unite to share intelligence, analyze threats, and coordinate responses for improved homeland security. The core purpose of fusion centers is to facilitate seamless information sharing among different stakeholders to address security threats effectively. Fusion centers offer key benefits such as real-time information sharing, enhanced situational awareness, coordination and collaboration among diverse entities, detailed intelligence analysis, and support for investigations and operations.
One such program is the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative (NSI), which encourages standardized reporting of suspicious activities for preventing terrorism and crime. Fusion centers are crucial in receiving, analyzing, and disseminating these reports. Furthermore, the Homeland Security Information Network (HSIN) provides a secure platform for collaboration among federal, state, and local partners, with fusion centers utilizing it for information sharing and response coordination. The Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) grants support to high-threat urban areas in building capabilities to combat terrorism, with fusion centers playing a significant role in intelligence sharing and response planning. Additionally, the Regional Information Sharing Systems (RISS) facilitates the exchange of criminal intelligence information among regional centers, with fusion centers often collaborating with RISS to address criminal activities, including terrorism.
Smith, J., & Johnson, S. (2021). Fusion Centers: Enhancing Intelligence Sharing and Coordination in the Homeland Security Enterprise. Journal of Homeland Security Studies, 7(2), 45-62.
Response #2 (Chris): Hello everyone,
First and foremost, through the last five weeks of class, we have looked at a multitude of different complex ideas, concepts, organizations, partnerships, infrastructure, and the issues that coincide with those mechanisms. In the United States, the Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) is responsible for drafting, training, sharing, and implementing vital information and practices to prevent and withstand copious threats against the homeland and its critical infrastructure. A large part of the Homeland Security Enterprise’s capabilities and responsibilities is conducting intelligence and counterintelligence far and wide in the U.S. across federal, state, and local platforms and organizations. One of the primary movers in providing adequate security and intelligence measures in the HSE is utilizing fusion centers.
Fusion centers play a dynamic role in the Homeland Security Enterprise. A fusion center is an entity that is state-owned and operated and act as a centered location for states and major urban areas to analyze, share, and gather threat-related details across State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial (SLTT), federal and private sector groups (DHS,2019). How fusion centers can supply this information sharing capability is unique. Since these centers are integrated into their communities, they can offer a unique perspective on specific threats within their localities as a frontline expert. Fortunately, fusion centers throughout the U.S. fall into a national network called the National Network of Fusion Centers (NNFC) allowing for two-way information sharing. In my opinion, the primary benefits fusion centers feed to the HSE are extracting and routing up extremely refined information and threats because of their “hometown” relationships and being able to strategize emergency responses while waiting for higher-level guidance (Bureau of Justice Assistance, n.d.). Moreover, fusion centers can task out local stakeholders like police and fire departments for assistance, instead of waiting for state or federal recommendations to be sent back down the chain. Nonetheless, fusion centers are one of many mechanisms the United States has to maintain intelligence and information.
Looking further, the United States is scattered with endless programs and projects that are currently associated with intelligence and information sharing across all federal, state, and local chains. At the federal level, the Homeland Security Information Network (HSIN) is the official system of the Department of Homeland Security in charge of the trusted sharing of Sensitive But Unclassified (SBU) information across all levels of government (DHS, 2023). This platform has created the Standardized Incident Management Dashboard Template, which can be used to quickly and efficiently pass best practices to benefit public safety during mass events. For example, this platform acted as a “go-to” tool for entities involved in the Boston Marathon Bombing, Deepwater Horizon, and other major events. It is a very neat and easy-to-use tool and the DHS shares a quick video on its exact processes, check it out! Other programs that are dedicated at the state level are Statewide Automated Victim Information and Notification (SAVIN) systems. SAVIN systems are networks to implement an automated method of providing solutions or activities to advocate for crime victim information and notification (SAVIN, n.d.). Despite what it may seem, this is not a specific program, but rather a working chain of state and local law enforcement, courts, corrections, and other victim services with dedicated assets to preventing crime. These organizations help gather and pose detailed information that can help advocate on behalf of victims.
Although they can bleed into state-level support and feedback, local-level programs and procedures also exist. A common local-level program that is seen within the intelligence realm is a Neighbor Watch Program. Neighborhood Watch Programs offer some of the most beneficial and least costly capabilities to prevent crime and formulate resilient bonds among neighborhoods that reduce crime (Neighborhood Watch, n.d.). These friendly and welcoming organizations delegate responsibilities like detecting signs of crime, creating subordinate prevention councils, and many other roles. These internal councils come together to speak on local crime and potential solutions that they can route up to the proper authorities. This way not only are they representing the community with the crimes that witness that outside eyes may not, but they are also solution-minded so support is more likely to be given.
Thank you,
Chris
References
Bureau of Justice Assistance. (n.d.). Fusion Centers and Intelligence Sharing. Bureau of Justice Assistance; U.S. Department of Justice. https://bja.ojp.gov/program/it/national-initiative…
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). (2023, April 28). Homeland Security Information Network (HSIN). Department of Homeland Security; Department of Homeland Security (DHS). https://www.dhs.gov/homeland-security-information-…
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). (2019, September 19). Fusion Centers. Department of Homeland Security; Department of Homeland Security (DHS). https://www.dhs.gov/fusion-centers
Neighborhood Watch. (n.d.). LAPD Online; Los Angeles Police Foundation. https://www.lapdonline.org/office-of-the-chief-of-…
Statewide Automated Victim Information & Notification (SAVIN). (n.d.). IJIS Institute; IJIS Institute. Retrieved March 10, 2024, from https://ijis.org/ijis-key-initiatives/statewide-a
Category: Research & Summaries
Explain how damage from the Hypothetical Threat could impact the Dependencies/Interdependencies between critical infrastructure sectors
Instructions
You must use the template I provided for this assignment since it will make it a lot easier for you. Failure to do so will result in a return of your paper for you to redo, a reduction in points, or both.
This second assignment also has three parts.
The first part involves picking something you found interesting from week six, exploring it beyond the readings, and expanding on it in a paper. This section of your paper needs to be at least three pages long and cannot be about something you wrote directly about in a forum.
The second part involves picking one of the critical infrastructures you learned in week four and writing about it using the six guidelines below. You cannot write about the critical infrastructure that you wrote about in the first paper or the forum.
The third part involves picking one of the critical infrastructures you learned in week five and writing about it using the six guidelines below. You cannot write about the critical infrastructure you wrote about in the forum.
It is up to you to decide what will be the most interesting for you!
You need to use the following outline for each of the two critical infrastructures:
Provide a Hypothetical Threat (cyber, natural disaster, or physical)
Brief background on the Critical Infrastructure as it relates to National Security
Elaborate on the known Risks/Threats/Hazards/Vulnerabilities from the Hypothetical Threat
Explain how damage from the Hypothetical Threat could impact the Dependencies/Interdependencies between critical infrastructure sectors
Existing Resiliency related to the Continuity of Operations
Consider how to Minimize Disruption that improves First Responder Safety.
Technical Requirements
Write at least seven pages, per the guidance above, and include the title page, an abstract, and a reference page (these last three items are not part of the total page count).
Scholarly and credible references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at least two sources per content page.
Type in Times New Roman, 12 point, and double-spaced.
Students will follow the current APA Style (7th Edition) as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.
Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic-type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.
All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric.
Define leadership, in your own words, and then discuss why it is critical for responding to disease crises.
I need a 300 word discussion post and two 200 word responses.
Discussion post: Discussion Questions:
Part 1. Define leadership, in your own words, and then discuss why it is critical for responding to disease crises.
Part 2. Elaborate on one infectious disease, except for Covid-19, that devasted our nation (from colonial America to the present) by briefly describing what it was, how it was treated (if at all), and the impact it had on our country – do not discuss political leaders.
Part 3. Explain a deliberate use of an infectious disease used by Americans/American troops for political or military gain, or against Americans/American troops, and the impact it had on those who used it and those who were the victims.
Part 4. Discuss one different infectious disease crisis, except Covid-19, and how political leaders of the time were either viewed as successful or failures in their handling of the crisis – do not focus on the disease itself.
Response #! (Josef): Part 1. Define leadership, in your own words, and then discuss why it is critical for responding to disease crises.
Leadership is the ability to give guidance and direction to a person or group of individuals during varying situations to achieve a desired outcome, goal, or vision. There are different kinds of leadership styles that the military teaches that can be utilized for different situations and with different personality types or skill progression. In the Air Force, we were taught four styles, directing, supporting, coaching, and delegating. Directing is used when there is a tight deadline needing to be hit and leaders don’t have enough bandwidth to explain situations or hold hands. Supporting is helping subordinates with tasks and does not give much direction. Coaching is a mix of both supportive and directive to help coach desired work motivation and pass along desired traits. Delegating is just passing the duties onto someone else with little help or input. In disease crisis, either a professional bureaucrat or elected official will emerge as a leader to get the Nation through the situation. The leaders usually go about leading the Nation in one of two ways, Guiliani, or Glendening models. The Guiliani model has the elected official making the steps forward through a crisis with scientific experts providing decision making info while the Glendening model has an expert in that crisis’ field of study making decisions with the elected official supporting them. (Kahn, 2009). People need a leader that will get elected officials and scientific elites to cooperate and work together toward a desired outcome to get through a crisis and help reduce public distress with how the situation is being dealt with.
Part 2. Elaborate on one infectious disease, except for Covid-19, that devasted our nation (from colonial America to the present) by briefly describing what it was, how it was treated (if at all), and the impact it had on our country – do not discuss political leaders.
On March 11, 1993, in Milwaukee Wisconsin, the largest documented waterborne outbreak in U.S. History started. Water filtration systems for the Milwaukee Water Works failed and distributed water containing a parasite called cryptosporidium to the surrounding consumers. The water out of the tap was tinted brown and complaints and concerns were initially dismissed by the water works company who claimed that the water was safe to drink. This was short lived, as people started flooding the hospitals with symptoms ranging from severe diarrhea to vomiting and anti-diarrhea medications were flying off the shelves. Subsequently, a boil water alert was implemented, and a blame game started between farmers who were blamed for water contamination from their farming practices to the water company for lying about the situation. Eventually the water plant was shut down. In the end, 100 people of the 400,000 infected had been killed by the parasite. (Kahn, 2009). The cost of the outbreak on the city of Milwaukee was $96.2 million between medical cost and productivity losses; this demonstrates the need for water treatment in America to invest in new water treatment technology to deal with decreasing raw water quality that impact public safety and National security (Corso, et al., 2003).
Part 3. Explain a deliberate use of an infectious disease used by Americans/American troops for political or military gain, or against Americans/American troops, and the impact it had on those who used it and those who were the victims.
The bioweapon program in America was started after other nations had already began and utilized them. The weapons were thought to be ineffective in application due to their sensitivity to environmental factors that destroy the disease before it can infect a target. Zoonotic diseases that can be transferred between animals to humans were thought to be the most promising to be used in open-air dispersal effectiveness. In 1950, the Army dispersed Serratia marcescens bacteria over open areas and urban areas from a ship near San Francisco that killed a Stanford student and infected 10 others. Other testing and maintenance incidents lead to President Nixon to implement the Biological Weapons Convention to cease biological weapon production and use (Kahn, 2009).
Part 4. Discuss one different infectious disease crisis, except Covid-19, and how political leaders of the time were either viewed as successful or failures in their handling of the crisis – do not focus on the disease itself.
The 1950’s Polio epidemic was the worst outbreak in American history at the time that disabled and killed tens of thousands of children. President Roosevelt, who had dealt with the disease himself, was credited with creating the National Foundation for Infantile paralysis (March of Dimes). The foundation was established to fund research for a vaccine that would end polio. Eventually a scientist and his research team who shared the same vision as President Roosevelt developed a vaccine through the Salk Institute. (Tan & Ponstein, 2019). The leadership that President Roosevelt presented through his actions inspired people that fueled his battle against the disease. (Welky, 2020).
Corso, P., Kramer, M., Blair, K., Addiss, D., Davis, J., Haddix, A. (2003). Costs of illness in the 1993 waterborne cryptosporidium outbreak, milwaukee, wisconsin. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 9(4), https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/9/4/02-0417_article
Kahn, L. (2009). Who’s in charge: leadership during epidemics, bioterror attacks, and other public health crises. 2nd Edition. Praeger Security International. https://psi-praeger‑com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/Topics/D…
Tan, S. & Ponstein, N. (2019). Jonas salk (1914-1995): a vaccine against polio. Singapore Med J., 60(1), 9-10, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC63516…
Welky, D. (2020) The president vs. the epidemic: fdr’s polio crusade. https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/the-preside…
Will provide second response once it is available.
Identify a specific academic, governmental, or commercial source of quantitative secondary data that could be used to solve the problem you stated in Part 2 of the Unit III assignment.
Secondary analysis of existing data collected by other researchers, for other purposes, offers researchers the potential to answer research questions without having to go through the process of collecting the data themselves. Based on your Unit III Assignment, address the prompts below.
Identify a specific academic, governmental, or commercial source of quantitative secondary data that could be used to solve the problem you stated in Part 2 of the Unit III assignment. Provide reference information for this source.
Describe how you will obtain access to the raw data.
Explain why the data are suitable for addressing your research problem.
List the limitations of using the data.
This journal should be at least two pages in length, not counting the required references page. Please thoroughly address all areas listed above, and include at least two credible sources. An abstract is not required. Please use APA compliant headings and sub-headings that align with the individual assignment requirements. Adhere to APA Style, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used.
The final essay is an analysis of media messages, with a focus on the news. We o
The final essay is an analysis of media messages, with a focus on the news. We o
The final essay is an analysis of media messages, with a focus on the news. We often get our information about current events by reading items online or watching/listening to the news, or by reading the news online. How does our media environment can shape our attitudes? This essay will help us to look at this question. This essay is worth 30% of the final grade.
Essay Length, Style, and How it is Graded:
The essay should be at least 4 pages long and no more than 5 pages, double spaced. Be sure that your font is no larger than size 12pt, Times New Roman, and that your margins are no larger than 1″ (inch).
The format is MLA essay with a Works Cited page and in-text citations. Do not turn in questions and answers, write an essay.
The essay will be assessed on how well you discuss the questions above in relation to the themes of our course, and how well the essay is composed. Please see the Grading Standards to see what counts for an A, a B, a C, a D, and an F.
Here is the assignment:
Watch and take notes of any one news source for one week, either on television or on line.
You can choose from CNN, FOX, MSNBC, Vox, or CBS, NBC, ABC, PIX11, The Washington Post, New York Times, NJ.com, NPR, The Atlantic, Forbes, Time, Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal or any other source but please check with me if you choose one not listed here.
The purpose of this essay is to look for and describe attitudes about race and class that may be seen in real time, in everyday context. Here is the topic question:
What are the main ways in which people of different race, gender and class are depicted on the news?
Find at least three news stories that illustrate what you see about race, gender and class divisions, and summarize these stories.
Study the stories in terms of the course themes you see, and organize your essay to address each of the following questions:
Which news source did you choose?
Who is giving the news?
What are the race/genders of the news anchors or hosts?
2. Give a brief summary of the three news reports you chose to analyze.
How are people of different races people presented in the stories you chose to describe?
Which races got the most news coverage?
What kinds of news did you see about each?
3. Can you tell the class of the people in your selected news stories?
How?
What clues are there with which you can tell?
4. Was gender mentioned in your stories?
Which gender got the most news coverage?
What kinds of news stories were about women, and what kinds of stories were about men?
5. Conclude with your opinion of what you have seen during the week.
Did you see different patterns?
What were they?
Did anything surprise you about what you observed?
What did you notice?
Important Instructions:
Include a description of which news broadcast you watched, including the gender and race of the anchor(s). You must discuss at least three different news stories.
You are STRONGLY encouraged to discuss more than three stories if you need to, but you may not use fewer than three.
IMPORTANT: Do not quote Wikipedia! In researching this paper you may of course refer to Wikipedia to familiarize yourself with the topic, and for your own information, but Wikipedia it is NOT an appropriate source for college level work. You should NOT quote Wikipedia, Dictionary.com, Encyclopedia Britannica or any online encyclopedia. However, you are encouraged to look for original reporting, online magazines and/or news reports. Those are acceptable sources. I have included a resource and glossary in Blackboard.
VERY IMPORTANT: You must be careful to PROOFREAD as well as spell check. You know which typos are the worst! 😉
After reading and considering the differences and similarities between theoretic
After reading and considering the differences and similarities between theoretic
After reading and considering the differences and similarities between theoretical and conceptual frameworks from different sources, the next step is to consider what type of theoretical or conceptual framework would be appropriate for your topic of interest.
Please note that this is not always easy or obvious, as it is a rare event to find a theory or concept paper that exactly mirrors your topic. Consult with the Walden Library to be creative with keywords and search strategies that will generate a scholarly article (or articles) appropriate to your topic.
For this Discussion, you will examine the theoretical and conceptual frameworks in qualitative research.To prepare for this Discussion:
Review the Grant and Osanloo article related to conceptual and theoretical frameworks found in the Learning Resources and consider how a conceptual framework differs from a theoretical framework.
Use the Course Guide and Assignment Help to help you search for a research article on your topic of interest that uses a theoretical or conceptual framework. (Note: This can be the same article as the one you will use for your Annotated Bibliography in this week’s Assignment.)
BY DAY 4
Post an explanation of how Grant and Osanloo (2014) describe the differences between conceptual and a theoretical framework. Support your explanation with examples from the article as well as from your texts.
Be sure to support your main post and response post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA style.
Read carefully case No. 5 from your textbook (entitled ‘Starbucks Coffee Company) and answer briefly the following questions
The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder.
Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.
Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page.
Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.
Late submission will NOT be accepted.
Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.
All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).
Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.
Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs):
1.Recognize the basic concepts and terminology used in Strategic Management (CLO1)
2.Describe the different issues related to environmental scanning, strategy formulation, and strategy implementation in diversified organizations- CLO2
3.Explain the contribution of functional, business, and corporate strategies to the competitive advantage of the organization-CLO3.
Case study
Read carefully case No. 5 from your textbook (entitled ‘Starbucks Coffee Company) and answer briefly the following questions: (1 mark each question)
1.Draw the SWOT matrix of the new Starbucks company.
2.Provide examples of the Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR).
3.What is the competitive strategy used by this company? Justify.
4.Use the five forces of the M. Porter matrix to describe the Starbucks industry, particularly, in Japan.
5.Describe the relationship of Starbucks with its primary stakeholders.
6.Describe the core competency of Starbucks company.
7.What kinds of strategic alliances are used by Starbucks in China?
8.What are the main challenges that this company faces in the Indian market?
9.Assess the competitive advantage of Starbucks in the global market.
10.Recommend solutions for Starbucks to improve its competitive advantage in both Japan and China.
Good Luck
______________________________________________
Answers
1.500
2.500
3.500
Is FGM an act of violence?
Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a practice common in certain areas of the world, most notably in parts of Africa, the Middle East, and a handful of Asian countries. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than half a million females in the United States — mostly immigrants — have been (or will be) exposed to FGM. Although federal law outlaws FGM, many states have also passed legislation to further restrict its practice and to raise awareness with at-risk communities. Two such bills, HB1466, An Act to Prohibit Female Genital Mutilation, and HB3332, An Act Relative to the Penalties for the Crime of Female Genital Mutilation, are currently pending in the Massachusetts House of Representatives before the Judiciary Committee. Using anthropological theories of violence, examine this controversial procedure from opposing sides by answering the following question: Is FGM an act of violence? Be sure to couch your argument in theory, carefully examining the issue from different perspectives. Finally, if you were asked to testify as an expert in support or opposition of these bills, what position would you take and why?
What specific role(s) does risk management play in national security and why is it of importance to homeland security and defense initiatives?
I am in need of a 250 word discussion post as well as 200 word responses.
Discussion post: What specific role(s) does risk management play in national security and why is it of importance to homeland security and defense initiatives? Within the homeland security enterprise, how does cyber-security specifically factor into critical infrastructure protection and risk management?
Response #1 (Uchendu): Afternoon Sir and Classmates,
Last week we talked about the Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Framework at the five-step method decision-making process for the protection of CIKRs. This week speaks to the role risk management has and the importance of the initiatives set by homeland security (HLS) and homeland defense (HLD). The use of the new risk assessment formula assists with determining the variables needed to create the level of risks proposed by different threats. The results of these analysis push the adaptation and implementation of strategies for both HSE and DOD stakeholders to develop their initiatives toward national security.
According to the National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP) “To achieve critical infrastructure security and resilience, critical infrastructure partners must collectively identify priorities, articulate clear goals, mitigate risk, measure progress, and adapt based on feedback and the changing environment” (Dolbow 2024). This statement demonstrates the risk management approach that must be achieved by homeland security enterprise (HSE) agencies. Specifically, the threat of malicious cyber activity conducted by nation-state or criminal organizations. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) guiding principles of risk prioritization, cost-effectiveness, innovation, collaboration, global approach, balanced equities, and national values encompasses their cybersecurity measures. This all points to one thing. The risk analysis posed towards the threat of a cyber-attack towards our nations CIKR is a serious one. When utilizing a three-question risk assessment of what can go wrong, what is the likelihood, and what are the consequences (Santos 2020), we can contrast aftermaths from different scenarios and by different actors. The outcome of a cyber-attack on an electrical power grid may create different responses from a natural disaster. The use of rehearsed critical action plans, specifically for the preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation from cyber attacks speaks to the importance placed on the protection of CIKRs.
Dolbow, Jim. “National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP).” Praeger Security International, ABC-CLIO, 2024, psi.praeger.com. Accessed 3 Mar. 2024.
Santos, J, Baggott, S (2020) A Risk Analysis Framework for Cyber Security and Critical
Infrastructure Protection of the U.S. Electric Power Grid
file:///D:/HLSS302/Risk%20Analysis%20Framework%20for%20Cyber%20Security%20and%20Critical.pdf
Response #2 (Dylan): Risk management, in the context of national security, allows for identification, assessment and mitigation of potential threats and vulnerabilities that are hazardous to the nation’s interests, critical infrastructure, and populous. Risk management exists in every facet of homeland security and defense operations. It is important because it allows the “powers that be” an opportunity to step back and think about what they are trying to accomplish and why. It has the potential to thwart negative consequences that can result from action or inaction before they can happen.
Using my profession in aviation under the DoD as an example, before every sortie my teammates and I go fly, the pilot in command must write up and brief risk with the operations superintendent. There is a point scale that exist for environmental conditions, crew member factors, events to be accomplished, proficiency, etc. Higher points total equal higher risk. Higher risk requires higher approval authority (transfer) for mission execution. Even moderate to lower risk requires mitigation efforts and an explanation of how we are going to accomplish what we need to accomplish in a safe manner, even on a routine training sortie. The bottom line is that the appropriate application of risk analysis and risk management can save lives and scarce, valuable resources.
Critical infrastructure in the United States relies heavily on information technology and interconnectedness. American transportation, power, finance, and water systems require intricate networks and firewalls that identify vulnerabilities an defend against attacks. Malware, ransomware, and nation state sponsored attacks are some examples of threats to our critical infrastructure. Cyber security initiatives, involving private business and homeland security organizations such as CISA, assist with protecting critical data, identifying perpetrators of attacks, and incident recovery when attacks do occur. By integrating cybersecurity into overall risk management, homeland security agencies and operators of critical infrastructure can make informed decisions about their resources, strategies, and responses to enhance resilience against cyber threats.
References:
Malatji, M., Marnewick, A. L., & Von Solms, S. (2022). Cybersecurity capabilities for critical infrastructure resilience. Information and Computer Security, 30(2), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-06-2021-0091
The paper is a qualitative study. In a separate document, WRITE A DETAILED/STEP-
The paper is a qualitative study. In a separate document, WRITE A DETAILED/STEP-
The paper is a qualitative study. In a separate document, WRITE A DETAILED/STEP-BY-STEP DATA ANALYSIS USING THEMATIC ANALYSIS.
The paper is attached. Only data analysis (thematic) is needed but detailed. No chatgpt/ai please.