Category: Religious studies

Major papers should focus on a particular (approved) aspect of (or topic in) the

Major papers should focus on a particular (approved) aspect of (or topic in) the
history of early Christians/Christianity. Papers should reflect familiarity with the
history of research on that (particular) topic and provide the reader with a critical
and chronological overview of that topic’s significance in the history of
Christianity (from antiquity to the present). Papers would thus ideally focus on
and frame a particular problem, question, or contested site in the study of
Christian origins. Papers should be no less than 10 pages (not including title page
or bibliography) and include at least five scholarly sources. A peer-reviewed
scholarly source is either published in a journal or book. Papers should be
double-spaced, in Times New Roman, using 12 point font (except for footnotes,
in 10 pt). Chicago Style Formatting (w/footnotes and bibliography).
Question: In what ways did early Christians navigate the intersection of Jewish traditions and Greco-Roman cultural influences to shape their identity, and how has this dynamic influenced the trajectory of Christianity from its inception to contemporary times
Professors input: the chronological constraints of our course end at the upper limits of the second century, so while you can certainly allude to contemporary times, the focus should be on the first 2 centuries

Sharp lays out three areas of inquiry in her introductory chapter (Historical, t

Sharp lays out three areas of inquiry in her introductory chapter (Historical, theological, and hermeneutical, pages 7-15). Choose a text, approximately 2-3 verses, from the Biblical texts assigned for this week and use Sharp’s discussion as a guide to interpret this text. Please pay attention to all three facets of the text. While you should focus on 2-3 verses, the context of your passage will certainly impact the interpretation of the passage, so do not ignore the surrounding text. Sharp has resources for determining historical context, but you may also use the books of Kings and Chronicles to find out what is happening in the background historically. Here are a few EXAMPLES of things to discuss from Amos 3:1-2. Historical: Amos ministers during the reigns of Uzziah king of Judah and Jeroboam II of Israel (See 2 Kings 14). Israel was experiencing relative peace and prosperity. Amos refers to God bringing the people out of Egypt (See Exodus 12-15). Theological: God’s relationship with Israel (bringing Israel from Egypt) indicates that God pays special attention to ethical standards of Israel (See Amos 2 for a delineation of the sins of Israel). Hermeneutical: Claiming a special relationship to God never excuses the practices of injustice and oppression. The people of God should maintain higher standards of justice and ethics flowing from the nature of God.

Examine your own experience and faith beliefs through the lens of cognitive psychology

This assignment is designed to help you examine your own experience and faith beliefs through the lens of cognitive psychology (course learning goal #6). For success with this assignment, you should include what you learned through the week’s reading assignments and instructional video.
Please write a 3-page essay discussing your thoughts about cognition from a Christian perspective. You are welcome to include more than the following questions, but be sure to at least address these questions in your essay: Do you believe Christianity aligns with the concept of cognitive psychology? If so, what do you mean? If not, why? Be sure to give examples of how your faith aligns (or doesn’t align) with cognitive psychology. What are three verses from Scripture that resonate with you regarding cognition? What does Scripture have to say about the human brain? Who is one biblical character who you would find fascinating to evaluate from a cognitive perspective? What characteristics of this person are you curious about? And what would you expect to learn about this person’s cognitive functioning?
Your essay should be 3 pages of text, plus a title page and reference page. Your paper should be in proper APA format (if you are unsure of APA formatting, please reference the materials provided in the Week 0 learning activity). Your essay should include at least 3 peer-reviewed references, which should be cited in your essay.

Submit a one-page, 10-point font precís on a topic of your choice from Romans Ch

Submit a one-page, 10-point font precís on a topic of your choice from Romans Chapters 5–8. Single space. Please include a short title, a thesis (i.e., a summary statement of what the whole thesis will be about), the content, and adequate citations. Choose one topic between chapters 5 thru 8 of the book of Romans. Find attached a precís example. It is not a paper. You do not need cover. Need bibliography. Turabian format

Have humans been pure or inherently sinful since creation?

SOURCES: All the sources needs to be substitute. They need to be leadership-based sources and the paper needs to be linked with them. A reference list of at least 20 scholarly sources in leadership is needed (not counting the Bible or course textbooks.) Your annotated bibliography does not count towards the word count for the paper.
FORMAT: APA Format
INSTRUCTIONS: PREVIOUS PAPER INSTRUCTIONS (#560052488): The research paper draft (literature review) should be submitted according to the following instructions: • Title Page • Introduction: The introduction should incorporate some elements of the proposal and should always conclude with the thesis statement. • Literature Review: To put it simply, the literature review is in fact your actual research paper without any of your own input. It is very important that, before you introduce your own ideas or reflections on the subject matter, you discover what the experts have to say. o Complete your annotated bibliography. Since the literature review is driven in part by the annotated bibliography, the order is essential. o Develop your paper outline by way of the use of Level 1 Headings. Remember to utilize the instructions in the video to follow some form of “problem,” “evidence,” “Solution” structure (using your own words as it relates to your thesis. o Build your literature review using the Smart Student method found in the videos. • Conclusion • References: This is important! You must retain your annotations for all references for both this and the final draft. • Revise your paper including an introduction and conclusion. Upon completion of your literature review, it should look and feel like a completed research paper with the exception of your own input and insights. • Current APA format must be followed The length of the research paper must be between 3,000 and 3500 words with a reference list of at least 20 scholarly sources (not counting the Bible or course textbooks.) Your annotated bibliography does not count towards the word count for the paper. Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_bzaUN4sHvkY8O7VPtKuLg Book Link: Anthony, M. J., & Benson, W. S. (2011). Exploring the history and philosophy of Christian education: Principles for the 21st century. Eugene: Wipf & Stock. ISBN: 9781610977326
OTHER: INSTRUCTIONS: Revised Instructions: This paper is a leadership-oriented paper. Using the book link in chapter 14. PLEASE FOLLOW THE TOPIC OF THIS PAPER (PHILOSOPHY OF MINISTRY)
This paper must resemble the general topic and NOT theological write up. Please revise the paper and the annotated bibliography thoroughly to make sure it stays within instructions. Modify the paper by using the general topic/research topic/research question to buttress points made in the paper.
General Topic: Philosophy of ministry (Anthony & Benson chapter 14)
Research Topic: The definition of people according to the Bible as perfectly pure creatures or inherently sinful ones.
Research Question: Have humans been pure or inherently sinful since creation?
Thesis Statement: Although philosophers have been trying to define human nature for thousands of years, this question still initiates multiple discussions that leave each side with their own opinion. The key may be in avoiding extremes since the Bible portrays people as good creatures that deserve eternal life but also have free will and a choice to save their souls or turn away from God and his teaching.
Book Link: Anthony, M. J., & Benson, W. S. (2011). Exploring the history and philosophy of Christian education: Principles for the 21st century. Eugene: Wipf & Stock. ISBN: 9781610977326
Comments from Customer
PREVIOUS PAPER INSTRUCTIONS (#560052488): The research paper draft (literature review) should be submitted according to the following instructions:
• Title Page
• Introduction: The introduction should incorporate some elements of the proposal and should always conclude with the thesis statement.
• Literature Review: To put it simply, the literature review is in fact your actual research paper without any of your own input. It is very important that, before you introduce your own ideas or reflections on the subject matter, you discover what the experts have to say.
o Complete your annotated bibliography. Since the literature review is driven in part by the annotated bibliography, the order is essential.
o Develop your paper outline by way of the use of Level 1 Headings. Remember to utilize the instructions in the video to follow some form of “problem,” “evidence,” “Solution” structure (using your own words as it relates to your thesis.
o Build your literature review using the Smart Student method found in the videos.
• Conclusion
• References: This is important! You must retain your annotations for all references for both this and the final draft.
• Revise your paper including an introduction and conclusion. Upon completion of your literature review, it should look and feel like a completed research paper with the exception of your own input and insights.
• Current APA format must be followed
The length of the research paper must be between 3,000 and 3500 words with a reference list of at least 20 scholarly sources (not counting the Bible or course textbooks.) Your annotated bibliography does not count towards the word count for the paper.
Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_bzaUN4sHvkY8O7VPtKuLg
Book Link: Anthony, M. J., & Benson, W. S. (2011). Exploring the history and philosophy of Christian education: Principles for the 21st century. Eugene: Wipf & Stock. ISBN: 9781610977326

From the Syllabus: Integration Paper: The “Integration Paper” asks students to m

From the Syllabus: Integration Paper: The “Integration Paper” asks students to make connections between the modules and four major sections of the class. It counts for 30% of the final grade. The paper asks the student to articulate a key theme from at least two modules under review and integrate that theme into their own understanding of religion, faith, and reason. (SLOs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
From Module 7 section, “Integration Paper” Writing is part of the process of organizing and communicating your thoughts. A basic series of steps can help you write a solid paper.
Part I
1. Determine which theme, paragraph from the reading, or point in a lecture interests you most, and note in which of the four major parts that occurred.
2. Find passages from the readings for that part of the course which discuss your favorite theme/topic.
3. Determine an underlying or related theme that is theologically connected to your favorite theme from step 1.
4. Find passages from a different one of the four major parts that describe that second theme.
5. Write down all the points of connection between the passages/theme from step 2 and from step 4. You should try for three major points of connection.
6. Articulate what those connection points from step 5 have to do with each other. Use this to make a claim about the relationship between step 2 and step 4.
7. Formulate a specific thesis.
8. Outline your argument (likely already organized in step 5). Write the paper, using quotations, citations, and the thesis and argument you have developed. Everything to this point is “factual” given the readings and the long history of Christian discussion of this material. You should have shown the integration of two major themes in the course in part I.
Part II
1, Formulate your own response to the integration you articulated above. You may agree with it and add arguments or disagree with it and consider critical arguments.
2. Formulate a specific thesis of the form “I agree that…” or “I disagree that…” Include a “because” clause. This is how you will integrate your own understandings of God, yourself, and the world with the material in the course.
3. Outline the argument to support your position.
4. Consider a counterargument (i.e., what a reasonable person who disagrees with you would say.”
5. Respond to the counterargument. Be sure to review the rubric and instructions prior to submission

First, answer the questions from Textbook IV. 16. Judaism; answers are straight

First, answer the questions from Textbook IV. 16. Judaism; answers are straight in the reading, but put answers in your own words to avoid plagiarism.
Second, answer the questions using the NY Times article that provides the answers. Again, put answers in your own words to avoid plagiarism.
Lastly, take general notes on the scriptures linked explaining their meaning.
All links are in the document under the Topics

What makes it possible for Hinduism to tolerate so much diversity?
You may refle

What makes it possible for Hinduism to tolerate so much diversity?
You may reflect on Devotional Traditions, Relationships with other Religions, and or Gods/Goddesses.

I have attached the link for two reflections on Consumption /oneness and globali

I have attached the link for two reflections on Consumption /oneness and globalization.
write a two page reflection on
Global faith
Reflection on Consumption and oneness

https://www.cinemapolitica.org/film/surviving-progress/

According to the law of Karma, “everybody gets exactly what is deserved.”
Do you

According to the law of Karma, “everybody gets exactly what is deserved.”
Do you agree with this philosophy? In what sense is it true or false?
Please note that your analysis should begin with or include the Hindu view of Karma.