Compendium of Social Doctrine on Economic Life

One of the primary lessons I have learnt from chapter 7 of the Compendium of Social Doctrine on Economic Life is the churchs teaching and perspective towards the management and direction of the economy. These teachings are meant to serve our society in a common good, referred to as liberal perspective. On the other hand, the compendium gives an affirmation that the church supports enterprise and free markets, often referred to as conservative perspective (Catholic Church, 2004). However, these perspectives and teachings can be summed up to one lesson. Economic activities and material gains in the society should be centered at the service of man and society. The compendium views economic life as one way people should use to fulfill Gods commandment to love others.

In reference to Daniel K. Finns heresies, I have found freedom to be one of the most tempting one. The interesting part is the contradicting views given by the libertarians, the government, Catholics and neoconservative Catholics (Santelli, 2011). Libertarians argue that the freedom to act is violated when governments bar people from doing so in particular ways and people are free to act if they are the source of the decision to act. Catholics consider freedom more of the self-fulfillment choice rather than the kind of self-initiated while neoconservative Catholics tend to defer with some of freedom dimensions endorsed by libertarians. It is tempting to learn the different approaches we can take when it comes to definition and practice of freedom.

A broader understanding and criteria are provided by the readings to make distinction on what good and bad wealth is. In relation to human development, good wealth is meant to promote integral human development as an individual and whole person while bad wealth sores up material wealth at the cost of individuals spiritual wealth (DesJardins, 2014). Furthermore, it has been noted that good wealth is socially, environmentally and economically sustainable, on the contrary, bad wealth sacrifices our social stability, environment and prosperity of our future.

References

Catholic Church. (2004). Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the church (No. 5). USCCB Publishing.

DesJardins, J. R. (2014). An introduction to business ethics. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Santelli, A. E. (2011). Nine libertarian heresies-A response to Daniel K. Finn. Journal of Markets and Morality, 14(2). Web.

A Religious System for a Future Dystopia

Introduction

Civilization has been linked to religious history for a long time. The sheer fact of historical studies is heretical for many religions; historical thought for other religions is an essential part of religious practice. Religious identities were an issue of decision and an instrument of control. In every part and period, religions have been a fundamental component in human history and remain so in todays globe. Some of the critical forces have shaped education, the arts, and science.

Main body

Religion can play a role in the evolution of sophisticated human communities of significant dimensions. Features of religious systems from tiny to substantial urban civilizations are investigated at different social levels. In transitional civilizations, the importance of religion is explored, as is the influence of witchcraft, superhuman enforcement, and the moralizing of gods cultural development. The transfer from an image to a conceptual modality of religion and the links between the holy and the mundane worlds are studied. Shreds of evidence and techniques from collaborative and multidisciplinary science are required for cultural evolutionary approaches. It might be precise because religions are complicated and varied, and they are the objective of empirical study. Religions vary, and with time, the dimensions of this difference alter. However, religious change and continuity appear to be predictable. In other words, religions are complex but not unpredictable. This work was written with the aim of studying the development of religion and creating a religious system for a future dystopia.

In order to define the concept of a religious system, one should familiarize oneself with the origins of religion and how it originated. Prehistory, the time before written reports, is the central part of the human experience. During the Paleolithic alone, almost all peoples history happened. Prehistoric civilizations covered the world and lasted for more than two million and a half years. They were different and challenging to study because of the dearth of written documents that describe their religions in depth. In the Homo sapiens period, anatomically, modern people probably first developed the cognitive capability of religion. In the Upper Paleolithic, religion was established with certitude about 50 000 years ago, excluding scant and disputed data from the Middle Paleolithic. Paleolithic religion may have been shamanic, geared toward unique spiritual leaders who entered psychedelic to gain esoteric spiritual understanding. These activities are projected based on the rich and sophisticated art that the Paleolithic artists have left behind, in particular the ornate caves they have made and their mysterious Venus images.

Around 12,000 BC was brought about by the Neolithic Revolution, which established agriculture as the primary way of life. Compared with its Paleolithic ancestors, neolithic civilization became hierarchical and inequalitarian, and their religious practice probably altered. The neolithic religion has been more structural and essential than the Palaeolithic religion, maybe a connection to ones ancestors and the ancestors of whole groups, tribes, and towns. The stone circles of the British Isles, the most recognized of which is Stonehenge, were one of the prominent features of the Neolithic culture. The Proto-Indo-European mythology, which initially spoke the Proto-Indo-European language partly rebuilt by standard religious components amongst the early Indo- European speakers, is particularly well-known in the Late Neolithic by Chalcolithic religion. In some respects, religions in the Bronze Age and the Iron Age are understood via archeological documents, and in other words, more than the Paleolithic and Neolithic religions through written records. Modern reconstructionists now focus on these ancient religious periods and numerous pagan faiths based on pre-Christian activities in proto-historic bronze and iron cultures.

It is also essential to understand modern concepts since they will give an impetus because the time period will be much less. A post-industrial society, a transitional society that is also linked with later social transformation, from a manufacturing to a service-drawn economy, is the next evolutionary phase of an industrial world is post-industrialization. Also, it is most apparent in the nations and areas which were among the first in the Industrial Revolution, such as the United States, Western Europe, and Japan. The outsourcing of produced products alters how society members view and deal with aliens or immigrants. Moreover, those who were formerly employed in the industrial sector do not have a well-defined societal function. Post-industrialism has a variety of direct consequences on the community. First, the term community is linked to more dispersed but equally thoughtful persons less with geographical closeness. Progress in telecommunications and the Internet means that telecommunications are becoming frequent, which means that individuals and their colleagues are further away from their jobs. Factors such as the Internet will help advance the definition of the future religion, as this technology is essential to people today.

Universalism is faith in every souls redemption; although universalism emerged in Christian history at different times, especially in the works of Origen of Alexandria in the 3rd century, it had its origins as an organized movement in the United States in the mid-XVIII century. The lighting worked to mitigate the stark features of the theology of Calvinism and to prepare the way for the regeneration of the concept of universal saving. It was inconceivable for the universalists if a loving God chose just a part of the people for redemption and condemned the remainder to eternal torment. They claimed that afterlife punishment was a little time when the soul was cleansed and prepared before God forever.

In terms of belief, universalists have varied dramatically from the beginningtentatives to produce declarations of faith, only partially successful, as late as 1935. The essential components of keeping the movement together were liberalism, freedom of interpretations, tolerance of variety, agreement on an approach to theological and religious questions, and belief in human dignity. Universalists usually emphasize the use of reason and the change of faith in the light of sciences findings. Therefore, traditional Christianitys supernatural aspects are dismissed as incompatible with contemporary understanding. Jesus is regarded as a beautiful teacher and an illustrative example, yet He is not divine. In the twentieth century, a larger view of universalism emerged. Although universalists underlined their connections to the Christian heritage, they investigated the universal components of religion and sought stronger connections with non-Christian religions.

In order to create a religious system of the future, one should understand what state the world is in at that moment in time. The year is 2100; life on earth is a challenge; rising global temperatures have left vast sections of the world stormy, people live under corrupted totalitarian states, and the war on knowledge is prevalent. If the descendants of todays people forget about the heritage in the form of todays religions at that time, then the outcome can be very different.

Totalitarian states will persuade people to believe that their government is something inescapable, and people will worship it so that it does not subdue them. For the government, this will be the most profitable option since all their actions will be justified by the fact that it is necessary for the good of the whole world. There is also an option where people can run wild and start worshiping the elemental gods, as it was before. The sun god will be in charge as the world is warming. The government will also worship elemental gods; however, it will be divided into several independent states due to differences in the interpretation of religion or traditions. Peoples lives will radically change, and their social position and level will begin to be measured differently. Most likely, massive showdowns will begin in the cities so that nothing will settle down so quickly. Everything will lead to local wars around the world, which will only worsen the state of the world, and religion will begin to change and evolve into something new or long-forgotten old.

There are more realistic concepts in which the following will happen. In the first case, the world will come to a critical moment when the main religious movements will cease to recognize others and turn their territory into totalitarian states so that people will not switch to other religions. The Muslim and Christian worlds can begin to feud because the Arab peoples have come to promote their religion worldwide. This religious system will be in such a way that a person born on the territory of a particular religion will have to profess it since the authorities will not recognize the religions of neighboring states, which can lead to claims from society and a desire to study the world outside the totalitarian government.

There is also the concept of an internet god; since the Internet occupies a significant part of peoples lives and many believe everything written there, this influence will lead to a new religious system that is not excluded. God will be one, and he will follow people as they will always count and everywhere, in real life, since cities are equipped with cameras and the Internet by themselves. This religion can also positively affect society if humanity concludes that the world should be improved and not watch how it dies before our eyes.

Conclusion

Summing up, civilization has always been associated with religious history. For many faiths, the reality of historical research constitutes heresy; historical cognition is an integral component of religious practice for other religions. Religious identity was a decision-making concern and a control mechanism. Religions have been a critical component of human history in every area and time and remain so in the world today. Some of the critical influences influenced education, art, and science. Religion can have a role in the development of complex, critical human groups. The proportions of this disparity fluctuate and change throughout time. However, it seems foreseeable for religious change and continuity. Religions are complicated but not unexpected, in other words. The world will be different as living conditions change. The social life of people will deteriorate as the state of the planet, and the political climate becomes harsher. Religion will begin to change, as people will not be able to perform the necessary rituals, temples may close, and people will have to change the canon.

Religion Study: Analysis of Exodus 32:7-14

Introduction

In the Book of Exodus, one of the most daring confrontations with God is the Golden Calf event. The story revolves around the people of Israel who doubted the divinity of the Lord and describes how God and Moses reacted to this treachery. The narrative reveals how arrogant and faithless people may become during trying times. According to The Ten Commandments, true believers should not have any other Gods or somehow depict the image of the Lord (Exod. 20:3-4). Nevertheless, it did not stop the people of Israel from carving the Golden Calf as a replacement for the divine being (Exod. 32:2-4). The focus of the current work is to analyze how God and Moses consequently responded to the faithlessness of the public and concerns the passage Exodus 32:7-14.

Context

To fully comprehend the context of the narrative, it is crucial to look at the background of the story first. The people of Israel had been led by Moses and the divine guidance until they reached the base of Mount Sinai. Upon arrival, they have chosen Moses as a representative in the communication with God since they were scared of direct contact with a divine being (20:18-21). To fulfill his obligations, Moses reached the peak of the mountain and stayed there for forty days while the people of Israel were uninformed about the period of his absence (24:18). This uncertainty has ultimately lead the public to believe that they were left alone.

The thirty-second chapter of Exodus commences with the evident doubts and fears of the people concerning the whereabouts of both God and Moses (32:1). Consequently, they turned to Aaron and asked, Up, make us gods who shall go before us. (32:1). Thus, the statue of a golden calf was created out of the accessories possessed by the people of Israel (32:4). Furthermore, Aaron created an altar and proposed a celebration, tomorrow shall be a feast to the Lord. (32:5). Evidently, such behavior contradicts the Ten Commandments and is considered treachery from Gods perspective.

Contents

The focus of the current work is the passage Exodus 32:7-14, and it tells a story of how both God and Moses have reacted to the faithlessness of the public. It commences with God being furious towards the people of Israel and stating, Go down, because your people, whom you brought up out of Egypt, have become corrupt. (32:7). Then, the Lord continues to describe the flawed and wicked nature of the crowd: They have been quick to turn away from what I commanded them/they are a stiff-necked people (32:8-9). Gods anger does not halt, and he states, Now leave me alone so that my anger may burn against them and that I may destroy them (32:10). At this point, the dissatisfaction of the Lord is evident and his motives to destroy the people of Israel are apparent.

Nevertheless, in the second part of the passage, Moses comes to an agreement with the Lord; and, thus, protects the people of Israel from the unavoidable death (32:11-14). Despite Gods request to leave him alone in 32.10, Moses does not go away but, on contrary, tries to reason with the Lord. Moses resorts to compliments and clever rhetorics to soothe the rage, why should your anger burn against your people, whom you brought out of Egypt with great power and a mighty hand (32:11). Furthermore, he appeals to the promises made by the Lord, Remember your servants Abraham, Isaac and Israel, to whom you swore by your own self (32:13). Ultimately, Moses was able to convince God to not annihilate the people of Israel for making a statue of the Golden Calf. Thus, the current passage is not only about the arrogance of the crowd, but also about forgiveness and the leniency of the Lord.

Analysis

Various experts have suggested different approaches to the analysis of the story concerning the Golden Calf. Some authorities believe that the act of anger and following forgiveness is necessary to demonstrate the nature of the Lord. While others consider the whole passage as a complement to the composition of the book and do not see the significance in the event itself. The current chapter of the paper analyzes the story and discusses different perspectives on the narrative.

The Weight of the Sin

As mentioned shortly before, one of the takes on the story about the Golden Calf is that the act of anger and forgiveness by the Lord is merely a literary device to progress narrative. While the event is dramatic and demonstrates Gods leniency, it practically does not affect the composition and flow of the book. In constructing and worshipping the Golden Calf, the people of Israel have contradicted at least four of the Ten Commandments. Furthermore, according to the first rule of the Decalogue, the Lord has brought the people of Israel out of Egypt (20:2). However, in 32:7, God admits that Moses was the one that escorted them; and, therefore, God contradicts himself and violates the Ten Commandments. Nevertheless, despite the weight of the sin, the people of Israel were not punished, and the initial anger of the Lord was quickly soothed by Moses.

Approaches to the Response

Experts generally have several explanations for the weak response to the crimes made by the public. The first perspective is that the sins of the people do not have any consequences due to the irrelevance to the plot of the whole book. That would explain why, despite the alleged severity of the violation, there was no punishment. Furthermore, Kugler states that the passage was added at later stages of the writing; and, therefore, was less structured than the other parts. Therefore, one might assume that the current incident does not have significant narrative value and just complements the structure.

The second perspective follows this idea implying that composition was reversed, and the Ten Commandments concept was implemented after the Golden Calf incident. If this is the case, then it would explain why neither the Lord nor Moses specify what the actual sin of the people of Israel is. After all, God only states, They have turned aside quickly out of the way that I commanded them (32:8). Therefore, some authorities believe that the regulation of the Ten Commandments was not yet implemented in the book, and the tale of the Golden Calf was written first.

Another take on the story of the Golden Calf follows a unique perspective and appreciates the essence of the Lord. The nature of God shown in the passage is quite ambiguous commencing with anger and ending up in forgiveness. The fact that the Lord can so quickly change his mind makes him more anthropomorphic and closer to actual people. Therefore, it is plausible to assume that the primary objective of the passage is to demonstrate this nature of God. After all, if the Lord can make false assumptions, then there is nothing shameful if a person does so, too. On contrary, such behavior by God might create more intimacy between divine and natural origins, which would further amplify the faith of the believers. Therefore, the primary objective of the authors could have been not to demonstrate what God can do but rather what God is like. Overall, most approaches to the analysis of the passage are represented by the three mentioned-above perspectives.

Cultural Context

To further comprehend the narrative of the passage, it is essential to turn to the cultural context surrounding the story of the Golden Calf. In Exodus 32:1-14, despite the evident objective of the animal idol, it is not apparent what the statue should represent. Neither the people of Israel nor Moses clearly state what exactly the figure of the Golden Calf is; however, the cultural context might provide insights into the subject.

The image of the bull is a highly frequent occurrence in the context of ancient religion and culture; and, thus, there might be several reasons why the calf was chosen for the statue. Amzallag believes that the bull might represent the other similar deities of that time, calf-shaped gods such as Baal in Canaan, Re, Apis or Ptah in Egypt or Sîn in Mesopotamia. Secondly, the calf could haven been used as a mere symbol of identifying the divine being or its qualities and not necessarily depict the deity precisely. Lastly, the authors might have implemented the image of the bull to describe a cultural ritual involving a calf. Concerning symbolism, these three approaches are the most prominent ones in the aspect of cultural context.

Nevertheless, it is still quite not certain who the people of Israel wanted to represent. While the evident choice is an abstract deity, some experts suggest that the public could have also wished to depict the Lord or Moses. Hundley states that the possibility that the people of Israel wanted to represent God is low due to the anthropomorphic form of the Lord in Genesis 18 and 32. Therefore, it would make little sense to depict a human-like figure with animal imagery. The crowd could have wanted to represent Moses with the figurine but the religious form of the festival in Exodus 32:5-6 does not support this idea. Overall, it remains unclear who exactly the people of Israel wanted to represent with the imagery of a bull. However, the uncertainty of the cultural context might provide further evidence for the analytical approaches mentioned in the previous chapters.

Contribution

Most likely, the authors wanted to include the passage Exodus 32:7-14 in the narrative to demonstrate the ambiguous nature of the Lord. As mentioned shortly before, such contrast allows the readers to associate themselves with the human essence of the divine being and feel closer to the deity. On the other hand, perhaps, it was a clever usage of a literary device to complement the composition of the book. Up to this day, experts are not certain about the true implications of the passage Exodus 32:7-14. However, it is evident that the dialogue between the Lord and Moses has developed them as characters providing insights into the motives and desires of each other. Therefore, the passage demonstrates the good qualities of both God and Moses and expands the narrative.

The Figure of Moses

In the research of the Golden Calf story, a number of experts specifically target Moses as the central focus of the passage. Throughout the whole book, the divine guide is presented as the quintessence of courage and leadership leading the people of Israel through all the possible obstacles. The Golden Calf event also reveals the virtues of Moses, such as the desire to protect his people and the courage to stand up to the Lord. Furthermore, he denies Gods offer to make a great nation out of him in exchange for annihilating the people of Israel (32:10-11). Such a feat of righteousness and self-sacrifice has turned Moses into the main focus of theological research for many centuries to come.

Conclusion

Summing up, the analyzed passage Exodus 32:7-14 is an essential part of the story about the Golden Calf event. It contributed to the enrichment of the narrative and complemented the characters of the Lord and Moses. The incident demonstrated the ambiguous nature of God consisting of both fury and remission and also portrayed Moses as an advocate and protector of the people. While there are some controversies about the true implications of the passage, it is an undeniable truth that the character development of both the Lord and Moses has had a positive impact on the narrative.

Bibliography

Amzallag, Nissim. 2020. Beyond Idolatry  The Transgression of the Golden Calf Revisited Old Testament Essays 33 (2): 207-231.

Byrne, Philippa. 2017. Exodus 32 and the Figure of Moses in Twelfth-Century Theology The Journal of Theological Studies 68 (2): 671-689.

Hundley, Michael. 2017. What is the Golden Calf? The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 79 (4): 559-579.

Kugler, Gili. 2019. When God Wanted to Destroy the Chosen People. Berlin: De Gruyter.

McKimmon, Eric. 2017. 15th October: 19th Sunday after Pentecost: Exodus 32.114; Psalm 23; Matthew 22.114; Philippians 4.19 The Expository Times, 128(12): 599601.

The Gospel of Luke 17:11-19 in the New Testament

The Gospel of Luke in the New Testament is a telling of the origins of Jesus Christ, the miracles, the death, and the resurrection. One of the illustrations that refer to Jesuss teachings and the overall concept of receiving salvation is Luke 17:11-19. The 19th chapter tells the story of the ten lepers. The story portrays the different reactions to the miracles of God, refers to certain aspects of the healing power of Jesus, and ultimately teaches about the importance of true faith. The passage exemplifies that while faith is the way to receive Gods grace, gratitude is the concept that truly saves ones soul. The one leper who came back to thank Jesus for healing him was the one who did not forget where the miracle came from and who is to receive gratitude for it.

Background and Aftermath

The passage itself tells the story of Jesuss journey to Jerusalem. In order for the circumstances to be clear, it is essential to examine the context. Initially, Jesus decided to go to Jerusalem, which is why he sent messengers to the village of the Samaritans, who were not welcoming towards them and Jesus (Luke 9:51-56, NRSV). This exemplifies that the Samaritans, who did not want to facilitate Jesuss journey to Jerusalem, were not connected to the Son of God both religiously and ideologically. Moreover, the passage illustrates the aim of going to Jerusalem, and the story of the ten lepers takes place during the travel. It is well known that Jerusalem is associated with the death of Jesus Christ through crucifixion (Luke 23:26-43, NRSV). The journey itself has been represented by the multiple good deeds that would become reasons for Gods word to be spread and faith to become prevalent.

Characters

The characters present in the Gospel of Luke, specifically in Luke 17:11-19, are Jesus and the ten lepers. However, no information is given about nine of the men. It is evident that since the distinction is made between the one being Samaritan compared to the rest of them, it is evident they are Jews, and they already know Jesus based on the fact that they had recognized the Son of God and asked for help. In terms of personal qualities, it is certain that the only individual who returned is the one who has strong faith and has recognized Jesus as the one who is to be praised for his healing. Moreover, since Jesus commanded all lepers to go to priests and they did so, this exemplifies the authority that ultimately influenced the ten men into following the directive and doing as told.

Irony

Little is known about the lepers, except that one of them is Samaritan. Samaritans, as exemplified earlier, have not been welcoming of Jesus and his messengers. Thus, the unlikely event in which the only individual who was willing to thank the Son of God for healing him was the Samaritan shows how faith and unity are synonymous. Ironically, the Jews, who were supposed to be the ones closer to the teachings of Jesus and more grateful for being cured of an otherwise incurable disease, forgot the source of their salvation. Instead, they did not make to effort to thank the Lord and praise him for granting them mercy after asking directly for it. Despite the differences and the stereotypes that can exemplify Jesuss lack of desire to heal a Samaritan, the miracle has shown that ones origins cannot determine ones character. The same theme is one of the most significant ones in the New Testament.

Speech

The dialogue between the lepers and Jesus is illustrated through an exchange of phrases. First, the ten men asked for mercy before Jesus responded by telling them to go to the priests (Luke 17: 12-14, NRSV). The second dialogue, which is only illustrated through Jesuss answers initiated by a monologue, is directed towards the Samaritan, who was the one who returned to show gratitude. First, the Son of God manifested confusion of the one individual thanking his being the Samaritan (Luke 17:16, NRSV). Then, Jesus said that the mans faith was what truly healed him (Luke 17:19, NRSV). Consequently, the speech is exemplified by Jesus and the lepers.

Genre

The passage illustrated one primary and two secondary genres. The secondary ones are dialogue and command. The dialogue between the lepers and Jesus and then Jesus and the Samaritan, as exemplified prior, is an exchange of phrases followed by gratitude and Jesuss answer. The command is portrayed through the Son of Gods initial directive towards the ten men to go to priests who would be able to witness their healing (Luke 17:14, NRSV). The passage, however, is a parable of how faith and subsequent gratitude towards God is what ultimately grants salvation and healing not only of the body but also the soul.

Setting

There are certain cues in regards to the specific location where the event took place, yet the name of the exact village is unknown. Instead, it is stated that the meeting took place in a village where the lepers met Jesus and asked for mercy (Luke 17: 12-14, NRSV). There is, however, a mention of the geographical location, which, as suggested prior, was on the way to Jerusalem. Specifically, Jesus was somewhere between Samaria and Galilee (Luke 17:11, NRSV). The two regions are neighboring locations, which also explains why the group of ten lepers consisted of both Jews and a Samaritan, two nations with contrasting views yet united due to a common disease.

Historical Background of Leprosy

Leprosy has been mentioned multiple times in the Bible, primarily due to Jesuss miracles which involved healing people suffering from this disease. Moreover, it is present in the Old Testament, where specific instructions call for priests to inspect individuals with skin sores and deem them unclean if leprosy is detected (Leviticus 13:2-3, NKJV). This illustrates that priests were ultimately the deciding factors in terms of whether a person has leprosy and is to be isolated from society or is healed. This is exemplified through Jesuss command aimed towards the lepers to see their priests as their disease heals on the way (Luke 17:14, NRSV). Since priests would not only be able to attest that the condition has been eradicated but also witness the miracles facilitated by God, the lepers would be able to praise Jesus while attesting their health and ability to return to their villages and families safely.

Historical Background of Samaritans

As mentioned prior, Jesus specifically mentioned that the one leper who returned to express gratitude was, surprisingly, the Samaritan. The verse is not accidental in emphasizing that this was an uncommon situation. Samaritans were not keen on welcoming Jesus as messengers came to the city and told the news of his possible arrival. The reason why people were not willing to welcome the Son of God was his journey to Jerusalem. The disciples were ready to burn the city down for the offensive response, but the Lord did now allow it (Luke 9:51-56, NRSV). The background of the relationship exemplifies two critical aspects. First, Jesus does not seek vengeance because an individual belongs to a particular religious branch and is merciful towards those who are not merciful towards him. Second, as the only person who returned to thank him was the Samaritan, the story refers to the idea that ones true intentions and faith are not necessarily shaped by their origins and community.

Conclusion

The story of the ten lepers covers multiple vital topics that refer to Jesuss mercifulness, genuine faith, and gratitude. The significance of the passage is often illustrated through the common habit of turning to religion and God during hard times and forgetting to do so when the challenges are not present. The power of gratitude is substantial since the initial aim after experiencing salvation is to return to the common way of life that one has been deprived of due to unavoidable circumstances, specifically a disease, as exemplified in Lukes gospel. However, the only person who did not forget who was the source of salvation and returned to show gratitude has shown true faith that remained strong even after the problem had disappeared. The passage is a parable suggesting that one must not forget the origins of the blessings and have gratitude once these blessings are present. This is the path to healing, both physically and spiritually, which are equally valuable and are to be cherished.

References

New King James Version. (1983). Thomas Nelson. Web.

New Revised Standard Version. (1989). National Council of the Churches of Christ. Web.

Developing a Personal Philosophy of Ministry

What I Believe About God

What people believe about God can both be universal and personal since at the end of the day it is upon a particular believer to make his or her personal choice whether to believe in God or not to believe in Him. As to the question of what I believe about God, I would first start by saying that there is a reason why we see what we see in this world. There is always an architect for every building and I believe the entire world portrays Gods creation. Some people argue that the universe appeared naturally. I believe that the complexity of the universe is proof that God had something to do with its creation. I also believe in the Bible and the Bible tells us that God is infinite and eternal. God is great and He is above all creation that is why I believe that God knows everything, all-powerful, present everywhere, as well as self-sufficient and self-existent1.

Though the old testament might be used by some to prove that God is temperamental, it still portrays God who is all-loving hence my belief that God is slow to anger and merciful. I believe God is righteous and just since He has always served those who believe in Him with utmost justice and righteousness as the Bible and history in general suggests.

What I Believe About Humanity And Humanitys Needs

I believe that humanity is naturally pure, but due to choices that we make in life, we end up becoming impure. These choices are greatly influenced by our needs that may sometimes be too great that we are willing to do anything just to fulfill them. Many are times that we feel we can only achieve what we need by ourselves hence when we cannot get what we need; we choose to turn to unconventional ways of getting it which then makes us impure. In other cases though, human needs may be achieved through impure means, but that doesnt mean that it makes us be sinners. For instance, all humanity needs freedom or rather the need to feel independent and spontaneous where we can make choices freely. This may be a challenge at times for instance where one is taken into slavery. In such a case, it would be right to fight and kill your captors which may not be a sin as indicated in the Bibles teachings even though the same Bible prohibits killing.

The need that is of specific interest to me is the need for security. This is the main reason that makes most human beings choose to believe in God since in Him they feel secure2. Security is not only from potential aggressors but also from any threat to human life such as poverty and diseases. All human beings want to be immune from these threats and hence they choose to believe in a higher power that can protect them from these threats.

What Ministry (Or Christian Service) Is All About

Christian belief often culminates in service, which is acting in a manner that improves the lives of humanity and the church, or else the belief in Christianity may die slowly. In the Bible, there are examples of people who lived their lives in the strenuous doctrine that was Christianity at the time as they sought to spread the gospel and ensure that Gods name was exalted by all humanity3. The acting according to the teachings of Christianity can also be said to be Christian service, especially where the actions of staunch Christians are in the limelight and their counsel is often sought to make major decisions. This is well illustrated even by non-Christians who often act according to the actions of Christians and if those actions do not make the world a better place, then it beats the whole logic of believing in God and being a Christian.

Christian service is often informed by the Christian belief and promoted by a call to do what is good to ensure that the presence of God is felt among human beings. This doesnt mean that Christian service only involves preaching the word of God, but it may also include charitable work and also serving in the church. Other people serve Christianity by proclaiming that they are Christians and people then join Christianity by their judgment of those peoples actions. It has often been said that the word of human beings is usually and easily moved by the example set in context with any perceptions held. The goal end of Christian service should be the exaltation of God through service to humanity, where the making of peoples lives better is of great importance and the promotion of the faith that is Christianity all over the world. This can well be illustrated in a case where if more people believe in Christianity they will join in the Christian service which will, in turn, make the world a better place.

The kind of ministry or service activities that will be effective in meeting the needs I perceive

One of the most important Christian service to humanity and the ministry is the empowerment of people. It has always been identified that where people are not empowered they often adopt unholy means of gaining power which then makes the whole campaign of making the world a better place useless. The empowering of people as the Bible puts it is giving people the power of choice4. Just to revisit the earlier example of slavery, slaves do not have a choice on what they can own and even what they can do. They normally do what they are told to do by their masters. In this case, the church in the 19th century did put a lot of emphasis on the abolition of the slave trade, which made people free and gave them choices as a Christian service. We have observed that most human actions are greatly influenced by the choices they make, which at a time becomes quite impossible to make good choices if an individual is not empowered to be in a position to do so.

One of the most broken Gods commandment is the one that says, thou shall not steal, but if a person is in a situation where he or she has no other choice, but to steal who then takes the responsibility for that sin?. Therefore, Christians must extend their service into solving the root cause of the evil we see today in this world. It is not enough to condemn what we see as evil, but we should also do something practical to make sure it doesnt happen again. Most Christians and churches in general have taken it upon themselves to alleviate poverty as a form of empowering humanity. They have realized that most choices to sin are often driven by the need to obtain what one cannot afford. It is very sad to see that in some cases the choice to sin is driven by lack of food by someone or his family.

How The Sense Of Calling, Purpose, Passion, Abilities And Life Experience Contribute To The Identified Needs

My sense of calling to give service to Christianity and humanity, in general, is to improve the lives of people not only spiritually, but also physically. People must believe in God as this is the basis of faith and the basis of improving the quality of their lives. Through the Bible, people get empowered and receive boundless advice on how to live good lives by showing them how to make educated choices. It has often been identified that staunch Christians make choices according to the teachings of the Bible even on how to engage in economic activities that are not evil.

I have always directed my energies in giving people the power of choice so that they are in a position to live comfortably and take responsibility for their actions. I also believe that no human being should be made to suffer while the rest of us live our comfortable and less stressful lives. Im able to relate to most peoples problems and needs with the use of my personal experience. Im also able to relate with people and form a relationship which then makes it easier for me to help them and for them to accept my help and believe in what I teach them. It is always important for Christian leaders to show compassion in their ministry work and relate more with the people they serve which will even make their work easier5. We should also adopt excellence, which is a trait that naturally occurs in us though we unknowingly choose to suppress it. Excellence ensures the prosperity of the Christian ministry and is based on strong foundations which make it outlive lifelong challenges that may come up long after we are gone. This is evident by what the early Christians did and it is their success that makes us enjoy the faith today.

Core Values and Convictions Used In Making Choices About Specific Ministry Programs And Activities

It is always important that we make decisions according to our core values. The most important point to note is that Christian service should adopt core values that are rooted in the Bible. Out of the many teachings that the Bible gives on this topic, the topic, which we can greatly learn from is the teachings of Paul to the early churches. Pauls advice that people adopting Christian service, either to expand Christianity by spreading the word of God or by improving the lives of people in their community and living as a Christian example should be transparent and exhibit the highest forms of integrity and honesty6. Out of some of the universally identified core values, some that I adopt in my Christian service include the putting of service before my personal needs, which is according to the teachings of Jesus as written by both Mark and Matthew. I also make sure that everything that is done in service to the church is meant to glorify God as he must be at the center of all Christian activities no matter their nature or the place they are done.

Christian service and service to the ministry should also be done according to the defined parameters and the culture of the people being targeted by the ministry. It is important to understand that even during the early church it was not common to find people with the same view of Christianity and religion in general. Even in modern days, we often find that there are people who will not accept any service from Christians citing religious boundaries. This will always make the ministry to fail in its endeavor in such places. Christians should also learn to adapt and apply innovative means in their service to the church, but this should be done with restraint not to compromise the traditional rules that govern the faith itself.

Personal characteristics I endeavor to develop further

Since I believe that it is inevitable to live a Christ-less life, I believe that it is upon all men and women who have accepted to believe in Christ and his teachings to take it upon themselves to spread the word of God to other people as their Christian obligation7. I endeavor to develop my people skills further and to invest more in understanding different cultures and religions so that Ill be better placed to relate to people from different backgrounds and successfully minister to them in a way that they will enjoy the Christian service and relate to it. The understanding of other religions will greatly help me in being a better apologist when challenged by non-believers.

Bibliography

Burton, Kate. Building Self-Confidence for Dummies. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2011.

Cook Communications Ministries. Can I Know Jesus? New York: David C Cook, 2004.

Corey, Marianne. Schneider. Becoming a helper. Upper Saddle River: Cengage Learning, 2007.

Ferguson, Everett. Baptism in the early church: history, theology, and liturgy in the first five centuries. Journal of Religious Studies Review 36, no. 1 (2010): 81-93.

Hoke Steve. Global Mission Handbook: A Guide for Cross-cultural Service. New York: Intervarsity Press, 2009.

Imes, Thomas. Humanitys Test. New York: Humanitys Test, 2007.

Monda, Antonio. Do You Believe? Conversations on God and Religion. Vintage Series. New York: Vintage Books, 2007.

Footnotes

  1. Antonio, Monda. Do You Believe? Conversations on God and Religion.Vintage Series. ( New York: Vintage Books, 2007).
  2. Kate, Burton. Building Self-Confidence for Dummies. (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2011), 81.
  3. Thomas, Imes. Humanitys Test. (New York: Humanitys Test. 2007),28.
  4. Steve, Hoke. Global Mission Handbook: A Guide for Cross-cultural Service. (New York: InterVarsity Press, 2009), 43.
  5. Cook Communications Ministries. Can I Know Jesus? (New York: David C Cook, 2004), 126.
  6. Everett, Ferguson. Baptism in the early church: history, theology, and liturgy in the first five centuries. Journal of Religious Studies Review 36, no (2010): 82.
  7. Marianne, Schneider Corey. Becoming a helper. (Upper Saddle River: Cengage Learning, 2007), 48.

How Biblical Worldview Helps in Everyday Life

Defining Worldview

At its core, a worldview can be defined as a set of beliefs, philosophy, and comprehensive conception of the world that is held by each individual. Gray (2011) identifies it as a collection of attitudes, values, and expectations which go on to inform thoughts and actions. Each persons worldview is unique and complex, based on their own experiences, upbringing, influences, and values they have set for themselves. However, oftentimes worldview is shaped by major institutions in a persons life, such as family, religion, education, and culture, so people sharing similar connections and backgrounds of said institutions are likely to have some matching elements of their worldview. Brandt & Crawford (2020) find that people are motivated to protect their worldviews, with the traditional hypothesis indicating that prejudice towards dissimilar perspectives is often present but varies in intensity based on either conservative or progressive beliefs of the individual.

The Biblical Worldviews Answers for Eternal Questions

The Question of Origin

The Biblical worldview states that God created the world and all its living creatures in six days. The view known as Creationism emphasizes that God created Heaven and Earth out of nothing by an act of free will. The process of Creation is described in the first chapters of the Bible in Genesis 1 through 2:25. In these verses, God creates man out of dust on the ground and then a woman out of Adams rib, thus were the first humans, Adam and Eve who went on to populate the Earth.

The Question of Identity

Humans are not necessarily more important than other living creatures but different from all other known created beings. Humans, unlike other creatures, have a soul and spirit, spirituality as well as a conscience. The main biblical view is that to be human is to be created in the image of God, a reflection of his divinity. John 1:12 indicates that those that accept God have the honor of being called His children.

The Question of Purpose

To be human also means having a purpose, which is to live a fulfilling life under Gods commandments, have a relationship with God, and glorify Him. Humans should live a life based on Christian principles and strive to contribute positively to the world in the ways that their talents allow them. However, humans were also placed on Earth to look after the world that God has created, becoming caretakers and stewards as directed in Genesis 1:28. Finally, while on Earth, it is the purpose of humans to live a life close to God and the Church so that one can be reunited with God in Heaven after death.

The Question of Morality

Biblical/Christian ethics greatly emphasize morality in the context of devotion to God. The basis of this morality is that each person is made in the image of God, but humans are under the influence of Original sin. Therefore, while free will is given, humans are expected to act morally to keep ones souls clean. Each human has a sense of right and wrong based on the conscience placed by God. However, the Bible contains general guidelines on the standards of right and wrong, ranging from the 10 Commandments to the teachings of Jesus, which are taught both in church and usually through cultural upbringing.

The Question of Destiny

The biblical worldview suggests that when a person dies, their soul, the breath of life that God once gave to men, leaves the physical body. The body returns to the ground, while the spirit returns to God, as stated in Ecclesiastes 12:7. As to what happens next, there are disagreements among Biblical theologians. Some argue that souls are judged and sent to either Heaven, hell, or in some denominations, purgatory. Others suggest that the souls are sleeping until the Final Judgment, at which point they will be reunited with their bodies for eternity (Segal, 2010).

How a biblical worldview influences the way you treat a person who doesnt hold your beliefs

The Biblical worldview suggests that even when individuals have different and disagreeing worldviews, one must treat them with dignity, respect, and Christian love. The approach emphasizes compassion, kindness, and understanding. As stated in Ephesians 4:32, forgiveness is key, so if someone shares a different view, one must not be offended but practice patience and humanity toward their views. One can present an opinion and attempt to teach the biblical worldview to the individual, but one should not attempt to force or judge them if they do not accept it.

How a biblical worldview influences the way you decide what to do when asked to do something unethical at work

When faced with an unethical situation, the Biblical worldview emphasizes to carefully weighing the decision and choosing an action that would be ethical and adhere to Christian principles. If the task being asked is obviously unethical (i.e., to steal), one should reject it and report it to whatever authority is responsible for preventing it. Therefore, it is not enough to just avoid unethical action; one should strive to make things right and prevent it from happening to anyone else. Righteousness and morality are critical to the biblical worldview.

References

Brandt, M. J., & Crawford, J. T. (2020). Worldview conflict and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 166. Web.

Gray A. J. (2011). Worldviews. International Psychiatry: Bulletin of the Board of International Affairs of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 8(3), 5860. Web.

New International Version. (2011). NIV Bible Online. Web.

Segal, A. (2010). Life after death: A history of the afterlife in Western religion. Crown Publishing Group.

The Holy Spirit: Characteristics and Activity

Introduction

The Holy Spirit is an inherent part of Christian theology representing an integral element of the Holy Trinity and a means by which people are both empowered and become messengers of God. In Scriptures, the Holy Spirit takes on numerous forms and has appeared to influence major events in church history. The Holy Spirit is both a complex person and concept that is key to the theological development and understanding of the Christian church and each individual that follows the path of Christianity.

Characteristics

Despite common beliefs that the Holy Spirit is a mystical force and ghost (although such forms have been taken), the Spirit is considered a person. The Holy Spirit is an integral element of the Holy Trinity, which is a representation of God in three Divine persons  the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit. The distinctive identity of the Holy Spirit can be perceived as the communion of love of the Father and the Son, which is why some scholars and faithful refer to him as the Spirit of Love and Gift (Levering, 2016). In this paper, similar to the Bible, the pronoun he will be used when referring to the Spirit. Yet they rebelled and grieved his Holy Spirit. So he turned and became their enemy and he himself fought against them (Isaiah 63:10).

Similarly to a human being, the Spirit demonstrates emotions throughout the Scriptures and can be offended or people can blaspheme against him. At the same time, the Spirit demonstrates love, compassion with free will, and qualities of communication and prayer. As written, When the Advocate comes, whom I will send to you from the Fatherthe Spirit of truth who goes out from the Fatherhe will testify about me (John 15:26).

The Spirit possesses eternal wisdom and kindness, the characteristics which each Christian strives to achieve, the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control (Galatians 5:22-23). It was because of Gods love for mankind despite constant sin which led Him to bestow the Spirit and His Son, sealed with the promised Holy Spirit, who is the guarantee of our inheritance until we acquire possession of it (Ephesians 1:13).

Despite the human nature of the Holy Spirit, he is eternally powerful. It is with the help of the Holy Spirit that Jesus and the disciples are able to heal, understand languages, and do what may be considered supernatural (Acts 1:7). However, the power of the Spirit is not fully understood, and he is not a being which misuses or demonstrates his power, all actions are done with a purpose, to promote faith, and under the law of God.

All those who are able to receive the Spirit have been able to relate and establish a relationship with him as a person, loving, serving, and respecting him. The Holy Spirit is a Spirit of Truth, providing the most important guidance and revelations which is why most faithful attempt to achieve that relationship, to become closer to God through the truth. And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Counselor to be with you forever. He is the Spirit of truth. The world is unable to receive him because it doesnt see him or know him. (John: 14:16-17).

Activity

Throughout the Scriptures, the Holy Spirit is emphatically present and is represented as a unique manifestation of God. The Holy Spirit was present to instigate events such as when Moses spoke to the burning bush, Virgin Mary conceived Jesus (Luke 1:26-37) when Jesus went into the desert (Luke 4:1), and when Stephen was filled with the Spirit as he was stoned (Acts 7:55). In the early Christian movement and Old Testament, the purpose of the Spirit seems to be eschatological outpouring, particularly through the restoration of Israel as the coming of Gods Spirit (Ezek 37:12). In the New Testament, the Spirit becomes a guiding force, working alongside Jesus during his time on Earth, and then leading disciples in spreading the gospel (Levering, 2016).

The Holy Spirit can inherently take on many roles in his doings. At Pentecost, the Holy Spirit was poured on the disciples as they were sent out similar to Jesus to forgive and spread the gospel, which was also being translated into various languages at the time. They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them. All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them (Acts 2:3-4).

He became a missionary spirit focused on spreading the gospel. At the same time, Pentecost represented an outpouring of the Spirit with new features, but also a withdrawal of the Spirit. Throughout Christian history, the outpouring of the Holy Spirit has come in waves that ebb and flow which creates significant impacts on theological changes (Goldingay, 2018).

The Holy Spirit plays a significant role in the life of believers. Upon ascension to Heaven, Jesus spoke, But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you (John 14:26). Christians adopt a similar approach, as in modern times, the Holy Spirit speaks to the faithful through the Bible, sacraments, and potentially sermons. He enables a Christian righteous and faithful life, guiding believes in times of trouble, comforts those who need it, and intercedes when darkness comes. Christians believe in the presence of the Holy Spirit in their lives, as a manner of Gods consciousness, a conviction that guides people to salvation.

The Christian church is a mixed body whose members are indwelt by the Holy Spirit, and through the redemption of Christ, individuals are prepared for salvation, via the teachings and sacraments which are filled with the Holy Spirit. Various sacraments in Christianity, particularly the Eucharist in its various forms are the representation of the Lord becoming man and sanctified that nature.

Through the channel of the sacraments, He inhabits people on a personal level, and this is done through the Holy Spirit which each Christian welcomes in. Similarly, in baptism or confirmation, it is the presence of the Spirit that provides the Pentecostal significance to each ritual, as it is a tranjective experience of the Spirit (Mayfield, 2016). Therefore, it is the presence of the Spirit that makes the sacrament an efficacious sign, the Spirit is the hand of God which refines and completes us, putting the final touch on the worship and love of Father and Son.

Person in History

Pope John Paul II was the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church from 1978 to 2005 and is considered one of the most influential figures in modern church history. From a very young age, based on accounts, John Paul II always turned to the Holy Spirit when in times of trouble. He used his connection with the Spirit to drive his faith as well as guide his principles of living. John Paul II is known as one of the most compassionate, forgiving, and inspirational Catholic leaders while still emphasizing the importance of responsible Christian living.

John Paul II highly emphasized the vital role of the Holy Spirit in the mission of the church and allowing to carry out missionary activities. John Paul II dedicated his time in the leadership of the church to study and promote the role of the Holy Spirit in Catholicism, highlighting it as a gift of God alongside human life (Alva, 2015).

The Popes connection with the Spirit was so strong that in 1986 he released a Papal encyclical titled Dominum et vivificated which in detail provided a theological examination on the role of the Holy Spirit in the church and the modern world. It subsequently became his most well-known publication and theological thoughts. John Paul II believed that the work of the Spirit is virtually inseparable from that of Jesus Christ. Therefore, salvation is found not only in Christ but in the Holy Spirit as well.

Meanwhile, the church is compelled by the Spirit to carry out its mission as it was proclaimed in the Scriptures which is an entity influenced by the Holy Spirit. The Popes Christocentric approach focused on all actions of Christ in the power of the Holy Spirit. Therefore, the universal activity of the Spirit is inseparable from the Body of Christ (the church itself), and the Holy Spirit acts by providing life to the church and compels the church and its believers to proclaim Christ by providing His gifts (McGregor, 2012).

Personal Experience

My personal relationship with the Holy Spirit has developed in the context of the church. Similar to most Christians, I have learned and sought to understand the role and nature of the Holy Spirit. In my goings to church with family from an early age, I have felt differently during the service, and I always believed it was because of the Spirit present in the church building. As I grew older, I took a different approach of trying to adapt the spirit in my daily life, on my morals and ethics, and how I choose to behave. It is the goal of every Christian to act as Christ would, and as described in this paper, such strength and conviction come with the aid of the Holy Spirit. Therefore, that is a relationship I chose to build, as a positive influence on my life.

My chosen vocation is becoming a translator of the Chinese language. It helps me learn about another culture, highly different and lacking Christian influence. I believe the Holy Spirit has led me to this vocation as a manner of both understanding my own faith as well as potentially helping spread Christianity. As an interpreter, I would be able to relay such complex ideas of the Holy Spirit and Christianity to a whole other culture, and similarly to Pope John Paul IIs teachings, it is the mission of the church to proclaim Christ through the Spirit. It is my hope to use the Spirit to achieve success since, in the Bible, the Spirit gave the apostles the ability to speak many tongues in order to spread the Gospel.

Conclusion

As an integral aspect of Christianity, the Holy Spirit has many characteristics and features. The role of the Holy Spirit as the messenger and fulfilling the will of God and a relationship with Jesus has been influential in driving the events of early Christian history. The Holy Spirit is a theological concept difficult to grasp for many, but the Spirit remains a factor that has inspired great leaders of church history through the centuries as well as a relationship that each individual Christian attempts to form in their personal faith.

References

Alva, R. (2015). The role of the Spirit in the mission of the church in the light of the teachings of Dominum et Vivificantem. Journal of the Nanzan Academic Society Humanities and Natural Sciences, 9, 135-147. Web.

Goldingay, J. (2018). The Holy Spirit and the Psalms. Journal of Pentecostal Theology, 27(1), 1-13. Web.

Levering, M. (2016). Engaging the doctrine of the Holy Spirit: Love and gift in the Trinity and the church. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

Mayfield, A. R. (2016). Seal of the Spirit: The sacrament of confirmation and Pentecostal Spirit baptism. Journal of Pentecostal Theology, 25(2), 222-241. Web.

McGregor, P. J. (2012). The universal work of the Holy Spirit in the missiology of Pope John Paul II. Irish Theological Quarterly, 77(1), 8398. Web.

The Notable Influence of Jihad in The Middle East

Anyone supporting, commissioning, and preparing terrorist attacks does not do it alone. For this mission to be complete and efficient, these individuals usually work sometimes as overlapping members or networks. In the context of these connections, they work cooperatively with other smaller groups or individuals who are ready to serve them. Jihadi is one such group, although they differ from the terrorist community as they lack a hierarchical or formal structure. The group, however, operates in a well-knitted pattern, which acts as a connector to other individuals to envision communication for the sake of meeting a goal. Another difference between the Jihadi group and other radical Muslims is that they tend to propagate violence through action and speech. However, this group also has extremists who prefer to propagate or support violence but have not been part of the violent team. From their dynamic, interrelated elements occurring as other radical networks, the group has influenced the Middle East since 1970 enormously.

Jihad is a term that is widely used by the western media and politicians, although, at times, its use is inaccurate. In Arabic, this term means to struggle and efforts, and therefore, when translated into Islam, it refers to a persons internal struggle. The strive is centered on building a good Muslim society against baser instincts or a faith war directed against the unbelievers. According to Jihadists, violent struggles are essential in terms of eradicating obstacles with the aim of restoring the rule of God on Earth while defending the Muslims as a community. Many Muslims do not use this term in public discussions, as it has a wrong perception. This terminology has been associated with acts of illegitimate violence, and that is why religious Muslims are distancing themselves from using the term in public.

Some parts of the world have experienced a series of wars, with the main perpetrators being of Muslim descent. For instance, the Indian country has experienced violence which Dabbous and Islam refer to as Muslim-Hindu. There has been a Christian-Muslim war across various nations in the world, dominating the Indonesian country, one of which is located in the Middle East. Sri Lanka has witnessed aspects of the Muslim-Buddhism war; Iraq encountered the Shia-Sunni violence, which can as well be referred to as Islamic terrorism. Various journals and news have documented conflicts that are considered sectarian or even religious, all of which occur due to Muslim influence. Therefore, the conflicts seen to dominate the conflicts in the Middle East in the context of Shia-Sunni and Islamic religions should as well address the aspect of Jihad.

At the heart of any Islamic religion or territory, there is the operative principle of the desire to create, if possible, by force, the religious activities of Muslims. The same conception is real from the Golden Age during the time of Muhammad in Medina and the 1970s to the present, in the context of influencing the Middle East and the world. Since the 1970s, Islam has strived to emphasize the aspects of establishing a true Islamic state in the Middle East and the execution of caliphate concerns. However, there has been a division as to whether to embrace the aspect of the caliphate and if its essential. Therefore, there is still a struggle as to whether the ideology should come on by force. Radicals such as al-Qaida and al-Nusra consider the caliphate to be established through long-term goals, while other influential persons such as Zarqawi and Baghdadi value the formation of the caliphate as their primary goal. The arguments between these two Islamic movements demean and go against each other hence swaying the beliefs of the Muslims. These arguments, which have been controlled by the Jihad gave birth to the need to hijack the media.

From the Middle East, the Jihad did influence the media, partly for their agenda, while not being conformed to their special focus. The trend occurred as a rejection of secular rule and also was concerned with embracing a state which excludes personal power and corruption. As a result, the Middle East has for many years been immersed in revolutions and conservations that value modernization. These issues have given forth tension of conflict in the context of, among others, the writings of Ali Shariati and al-Afghani and occur similar to the violence noted in Latin America.

Observing issues of conflicts occurring between Palestine and Israel and that which occurs during the Iranian Revolution, the phenomenon of religion becomes a reality. The influence, such as that of the Israel-Palestinian conflict, which occurred from the concept of territorial control, has been redefined by the Jihads struggles and the supporters to be reinterpreted to appear as one rooted in religious issues. That has then been noted to cause enmity between the Muslims and Christians because the work of transformation and interpretation of every war has influenced the way people view Muslims. It means, therefore, by the influence of the Jihads way of thinking, the Middle East becomes an area through which Christians and Muslims have and are still at war. The influence of this group gave rise to various revolutionaries.

Jihads Influence Started in Egypt in 1981

No doubt, the modern Jihadi, although not as effective as it used to be, has direct roots in the 1970s acts. During this year, various groups started to campaign as a way of overthrowing the Arabians Worlds regime, with a need to establish the Islamic states. The influence of the Jihad and their fans to wage war was in line with a booklet entitled Al-Farida Al-Ghraib. The groups main aim was to ensure there were no obstacles to the creation of their religion. They went to the extreme of killing anyone they thought would be an obstacle to achieving their mission. For instance, the al-jihad group, which was led by Mohammed Abdul Salam, went to the extreme to assassinate Egypts President Sadat in 1981, a few years after its formation.

The group received power because the Muslims neglected them to carry out their mission in the manner of violent struggles. In this regard, the Muslims considered them to be engaging with their inner strives, working against their baser instincts. During this period, Jihad considered the need to fight against the local Muslim regimes instead of dwelling on eliminating the non-Muslim threats. This was essential because the Jihad knew if they managed to control their locals to submit to their wants, the external threats would not be a threat.

There has been a reinterpretation of how Muslims live, and with the influence of Jihad, the perception controls the residents. The movement formed by the Palestine Liberation Organization, which was also influenced by the Jihad in 1964, had the intention of representing all the Palestinians to be independent, whether they were Muslim or Christians. The contradiction which this movement brought about the militant Muslim groups, which letter resulted in the intifada in 1987. The Jihad, therefore, has caused the need for religious reinterpretation, which has created new realities of removing the first issues of conflict, making the Muslims as a religion to be rejected.

The Jihad community was first launched in Egypt in the 1970s, and after accomplishing their mission of killing Sadat, Abdul Salams group started to move out of the country. They were being pursued, and therefore, they had to check on a safer haven to continue with their mission. The most convenient destination for them was Afghanistan because, in this country, the Jihads battlefields were being created. This was a battlefield for the Jihad because they were fighting against the 1979s Soviet invasion. At that time, the U.S had its Gulf Arab allies, and therefore they joined hands to fight the Jihad. As a result, young Muslims were being encouraged to move to Afghanistan so that they could defend their people against the Soviet Unions power. The unfortunate reality is that the local government backed the young Muslims who, by that time, were fighting to defend their territories.

The young Muslims who joined this group was also motivated by the fatwa. These were religious rulings that were publicized by a Palestinian-Jordanian clerk by the name of Azzam Abdullah. That means, Jihad was allowed in Afghanistan, and this made any other Muslim country facing aggression adopt the concept of this group. Therefore, every abled Muslim individual had to own this duty as a way of defending their territory. This means the Jihad influenced all the Muslims to be warriors who would defend their territory, even if it was through fighting and killing.

Azzam grew to mentor many other members of Muslim, including Osama Bin laden. This terrorist came up with al-Qaeda as a dread group following an article Osama wrote for the Jihad. It is through this individual that a base involving thousand of foreign fighters was formed by the name mujahideen, and they became fighters in Afghanistan. There was a war against this group and their leaders, including the cleric, who later was killed in a car bombing, leading to global jihadism. The Soviets, by the year 1989, left Afghanistan, and therefore those who had joined the fighting group through they had triumphs making many go and try what they had learned in their countries. It is through this that the Jihad movement managed to influence the neighboring countries, with one intention of fighting as a way to resolve their religious demands. The Jihad experience then was exported to Tajikistan, Bosnia, and Chechnya, where all the Muslims learned the need to defend their interest against the non-Muslim people and army.

Influence on Other Nations

Currently, there is still war, which was initiated by the Jihadists but is still affecting many nations, including Syria. In this nation, there is concern about who is dominating the discourse, a fact which reveals that the war will still continue, as it was rooted in the Jihadists visions. The Egyptian and the Saudi Arabian individuals have since combined powers to form the World Islamic movement working against the Crusaders and the Jews. It was from this that the group joined in signing a declaration that aimed at fighting the United States and its allies. The al-Qaeda members came out to make various attacks against the U.S and before the U.S counter of overthrowing the Taliban regime, which had hosted in a sanctuary the Al-Qaeda leaders. It was the initial humble background of the Jihadists which gave rise to al-Qaeda and the war series against the superpower country.

The military technique that these people had received made them embrace new tactics. Under the guidance of Abu Musab, who was a Jordanian militant, the jihadists and other Muslim groups started to make videos of beheaded civilians. The subsequent acts were the al-Qaedas offshoots which were formed in the Middle East and developed to form a group known as Islamic State in Iraq. Various groups which attracted the concept of Jihad and created battlefields to safeguard their interests have since been created, including the Islamic State leader, who is struggling to seize control. They have so far managed to hold a large swathe in Syria and launched an offensive group in Iraq. It is through here that the capturing of Mosul was done and the formation of the caliphate. The fights that countries have witnessed, whether physical or spiritual, involving Muslims and other religions have been created by the Jihad movement, which became vigorous in the Middle East.

How Jihads Influence Has Affected the Islamic Religion

It started with the successful succession of the terrorist movement by the name Salafi-Jihad, then the Islamic State in Iraq, and then the Syrian ISIS movement, before the emergence of the Islamic State (IS). Foreign fighters were the main facilitators of these movements and their respective succession. However, their existence continued to corrupt the worlds minds and tarnished their image as a religion. For instance, most the Asia countries consider Islam a threat because there has been continued recruitment of Jihad members in Iraq and Syria. Such recruitment made some governments arrest people who intend to go to Jihad, exhort donations, or engage in the facilitation of the recruitment process. This is the intention so that the Jihad infrastructure can be blown out. To make it even worse, the jihad group, which the majority have been the Muslim people been noted to launch attacks on churches. They have therefore gone further to have inter-communal strife occurring between the Muslims and Christians as well as attacking the Christian priests.

Such attacks mean one main thing Muslims are supporters of Jihad and war-related movements to fight for their interests. They do this by embracing the terrorist image, and therefore, the world views Muslims as supporters and part of the terrorist against other religions. Even though the countries around the Asia and the Middle East regions have varying power in controlling terrorist groups, they make every effort to combat this community. For instance, there are strict laws governing the way the Muslims operate with keen consideration to whether there are any members of terrorist groups emerging from them. That means the regions where Islam is rampant are closely associated with terrorism, a fact which shows that the religion is feared to be a cultivator of terrorists.

The world has a specific view of Muslims; for instance, they perceive them as fanatics. This occurs from the idea that Muslims as a religion have strict guidelines of how people should live, although there are various diversity controlling them. Jihad as a group influenced the followers to be devotional to the extent that they were forced to be as loyal as they could. The practice of religion is then done in unison as agreed by the leader, which replicates the way the Jihad leaders led others to follow their commands even if it appears to be inhuman.

The world understands this group to be a group of people who are violent. Some Muslim leaders do not tolerate the aspects of violence, and therefore they condemn this idea as much as other religions do. They even ask whether the bombing of a building in Oklahoma by a Christian means all Christians are terrorists. However, news stories about Islamic terrorism, basically from Jihad and other violent Islamic groups, have tarnished the image of the Muslim community. The majority of non-Muslims believe that Islam upholds the concept and ideology of Jihad, which they consider to be a holy war that is fought directly against non-believers. However, for the Muslims themselves, the aspect of Jihad is personal, which occurs in the context of the internal struggle of a persons morals. On the contrary, the non-believers, through these acts, view them as people who are fond of killing others in the name of protecting their religion.

Jihad, in another perception, occurs as a social struggle for defense and justice which the Islamic community honors. The Quran, on the other hand, according to Gardner, allows the aspect of war and the need to expand the community of Islam. Much worse, there are set limits to the conversion and expansion of Islam, which reveals that the conversion of people should not be forceful, or through battle, and the livelihood of those who are noncombatants needs to be protected. However, there is no buy-in to this perception because, from the inception of Jihad, the Muslim community has been known to be violent.

In conclusion, the Jihad movement has greatly affected the people of the Middle East and, in the end, has affected the way people perceive them. Jihad was a group formed in Muslim-dominated countries, including Egypt, where they killed all those who acted as an obstacle to their religion. The Muslims want their religious principles to be honored by everyone and even if this will happen by force. They are radical in their beliefs and honor what their leaders say, a fact which has evoked a negative perception of them by non-Muslims. However, the determination and struggle they have were implemented on the battlefields, where the fighters were majorly Muslims defending their interests.

References

Dabbous, Saad and Islam, Jaan. An Analysis of the Historical Application of Jihad and Implications on the Clash of Civilizations. International Journal of Political Theory,1. no.1 (2016): 1-18.

Daniel, Augusto and Gagliano, Jeffrey. 2020. Addressing the Combined Threat of Violent Jihad and Cultural Jihad. International Journal of Security Studies 2(1):1-29. Web.

Gardner, Frank. 2020. Is Africa overtaking the Middle East as the new jihadist battleground? BBC News. Web.

Koch, Bettina. 2019. Unmasking Religious Conflicts and Religious Radicalization in the Middle East. E-International Relations. Web.

Rabil, Robert. 2018.Contextualizing Jihad and Takfir In the Suunni Conceptual Framework. Fikra Forum. Web.

Lipka, Michael. 2017. Muslims And Islam: Key Findings in The U.S. And Around the World. Pew Research Center. Web.

Schwanitz, Wolfgang. 2021. The Jihad Legacy of World War 1. Foreign Policy Research Institute. Web.

Saritoprak, N. Seyma., Exline, J. Julie, and Stauner, Nick. Spiritual Jihad among U.S. Muslims: Preliminary Measurement and Associations with Well-Being and Growth. MDPI 9, no.5 (2018): 157-327.

Exegesis of Job 23: 1-17, The Book of Job

Introduction

The Book of Job can be considered as one of the most philosophical works of the Old Testament. The uniqueness of the Book of Job is in its depth and thoroughness in dealing with the relationship of human suffering to divine justice (Gaebelein, 1979-1992, 843). The commonly accepted notion that good doing is rewarded, while evil-doing is punished, is challenged, changing the nature of knowledge about God and human suffering. Such shift can be specifically attributed to the paradox of Gods presence, i.e. explaining the suffering as the absence of Gods justice and at the same time Gods presence is the cause of much suffering, where Jobs sufferings are the heavy hand of God on him (Thomason, 1997, 57). The latter can be evident in the third cycle of the dialogue dispute between Job and his friends. In that regard, this paper attempts to construe Jobs reply to Eliphaz in Job 23:1-17, stating that despite Jobs righteousness, his limited knowledge and his human perspective, he had faith that righteousness will be rewarded after all. Accordingly, the lack of understanding of the notion of submission and Gods presence caused some doubts in his mind that he overcame, which explains the differences in Jobss image in the prologue, the epilogue and discussion parts.

Exegesis

Acceptance and submission

The chapter 23 serves as Jobs reply to Eliphazs questions in the previous chapter, which represent the limited knowledge of humans on Gods purpose. Eliphaz questions the righteousness of Job, Is it for your piety that he reproves you, and enters into judgment with you? (Job 22:4 NRS). The following assumptions of Jobs sins, demonstrate the presumptive and arrogant claim to knowledge of Gods ways (Gaebelein, 1979-1992, 860). Jobs reply is also a demonstration of a humans perspective, providing his own definition of submission to Gods will, i.e. not departing from the Þ´æ°Õ¸Ô (Strongs 4687: commandment; law; ordinance). Jobs perception of submission can be seen in the way he characterizes his attitude toward Gods words, æ¸ä·ß (Strongs 4687), treasuring up and saving them (Job 23:12 NRS). It can be understood that Jobs arguments, from the Hebrew word ê¼Õ¹Û·×·ê (Strongs number 8433b: in this context and considering the context, rebuke can be used rather than argument), are mainly concerned with Job following the commandment. However, elements are differing from Gods perspective on submission, and which Job, even following Gods words did not comprehend. One of such elements is the fact of Job lifting his voice in protest (Bartlett and Taylor, 2009, 148). The latter can be seen in the usage of such words as Þ°è´Ù (Strongs number 4805: rebellious), and вà¸×¸Ô (Strongs number 0585: expressing grief or physical distress), referring to the feeling that overwhelms Job. Specifically, the usage of the word Þ°è´Ù (4805) can be outlined, where the translation as rebellion is not a coincidence, considering the usage of the Hebrew term in conjunction with the word è·â (Strongs number 07451b: evil, harm, calamity, trouble); Evil people seek only rebellion, but a cruel messenger will be sent against them (Pro 17:11 NRS).

Rebellion (Þ°è´Ù), in regards of submission and acceptance, can be seen in the definitions of rebellion in the books of Samuel and Ezekiel, For rebellion is no less a sin than divination, and stubbornness is like iniquity and idolatry (1Sa 15:23 NRS); do not be rebellious like that rebellious house; open your mouth and eat what I give you (Eze 2:8 NRS). Although such departure in the character of Job at the beginning of the book and latter passages, from being presented as a saint of God who will not curse God and die to having complaints that are bitter to the point of being shocking (Gaebelein, 1979-1992, 845), there is a unity in terms of the fear of injustice, referred by Ginsberg as being peculiar to Jews (Pope, 1974, XLII). Although such assertion might be mitigated, the Hebrew word Ñä¼·×·Ó (Strongs number 6343: dread, and the corresponding derived verb 6342) can be found nine times in the Book of Job. Nevertheless, with the fear and obedience, Job lacked an important element, demonstrated in his reply to Eliphaz, i.e. having rebellious complaints, with the root word of the latter, i.e. Þ¸è¸Ô (Strongs number 4784: being rebellious, disobedient, refractory), being conditioned with the fear of God; If you will fear the LORD and serve him and heed his voice and not rebel against the commandment of the LORD&, it will be well (1Sa 12:14 NRS). Nevertheless, it should be stated that the problem of Job is not in Gods attributes, rather with another significant element in the book, i.e. questioning the presence-absence of God.

The absence of God

It can be seen from Jobs response to Eliphaz that Gods absence is an essential factor in such reply (Bartlett and Taylor, 2009, 151). On the one hand, Job feels Gods hands through his sufferings, while on the other hand, Job states, If I go forward, he is not there; or backward, I cannot perceive him (Job 23:8 NRS). In the following verse, Job continues, on the left he hides, and I cannot behold him; I turn to the right, but I cannot see him (Job 23:9 NRS). In those two verses the main emphasis can be understood through the usage of the words perceive, behold and see (Job 23:8-9 NRS), i.e. Ѽ´Ùß (Strongs number 0995), ׸ָÔ (Strongs number 2372), and è¸Ð¸Ô (Strongs number 7200) respectively. It can be seen that in addition to the physical sight of the justice of God, for Job, the conclusion about Gods absence is largely based on his disability to understand and comprehend. The latter show, to an extent, that Job follows the logic of his friends, i.e. it is impossible that he should suffer so and not have done wrong, so he does not see God as he is pious and so does not deserve the punishment he is receiving (Dunn and Rogerson, 2003, 339).

Such blindness in Jobs case, i.e. the incapability of understanding Gods purpose is driven by the limitedness of human perspective. In that regard, such limited perspective is only from Jobs side, where Job acknowledges despite not seeing Him, God knows the way Job takes (Job 23:10 NRS). In that regard, it can be stated that comprehension of God in Jobs reply is twofold, where on the one hand, he complains of his sufferings, not seeing God, and on the other, he acknowledges that this is a test. The latter can be seen through the verse when he has tested me, I shall come out like gold (Job 23:10 NRS). The Hebrew term Ѽ¸×·ß (Strongs number 0975: to examine, to prove), implies examining the nature of the person, wherein the Old Testament is used in conjunction with such words as test my heart and mind (Psa 26:2 NRS) and test me and know my thoughts (Psa 139:23 NRS). In both cases, it can be implied that such test investigates whether the person is worthy. Accordingly, the same term can be used when testing gold, which was used in the verse as a figure of speech, meaning that Job will prove worthy of the test. Such confidence contradicts the beginning of the chapter, in which Job is desperate in his sufferings, which might assume that Job has doubts in his righteousness. In that regard, it can be said that the verses in which Job confirms his obedience to God might be addressed to himself as well, specifically considering his fear of God and his limited knowledge, he does not Gods purposes, and thus, meeting God does not know the outcome of such meeting (Thomason, 1997, 57). Such statement opposes the view that God vindicating Job over his friends is a suggestion that questioning the relationship with God in an angry manner is better than to accept stock answers as the friends have done (Dunn and Rogerson, 2003, 339). It was a purpose of God to test Job, whose heart was made soft, to give him knowledge that could not understand at the time, Therefore I have uttered what I did not understand, things too wonderful for me, which I did not know (Job 42:3 NRS).

Conclusion

It can be concluded that human limited knowledge might change their perception of the way right and evil are reattributed, which is seen through the example of Job. The pace of the Book of Job has coincided with the doubts that might have across Jobs heart. The Book of Job has a purpose that cannot be reduced to a simple statement (Gaebelein, 1979-1992, 858), where the tests that Job was put into was to strengthen his faith, through removing the doubts caused by his limited understanding of Gods presence and what the submission to God is, and when his rebellious attitudes dissolve, and resentment disappears, he came to accept God on Gods terms (Gaebelein, 1979-1992, 860). Such a point of spiritual maturity would not have been achieved without the sufferings that Job has gone through removing his doubts.

References

Bartlett, David Lyon, and Barbara Brown Taylor, eds. 2009. Feasting on the Word Year B : Preaching the Revised Common Lectionary. 1st ed. Vol. 4. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

Dunn, James D. G., and J. W. Rogerson. 2003. Eerdmans commentary on the Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans.

Gaebelein, Frank E., ed. 1979-1992. The Expositors Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House.

Pope, Marvin H. 1974. Job in the Anchor Bible. New York: Doubleday & Company Inc.

Thomason, Bill. 1997. God on Trial: The Book of Job and Human Suffering. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.

Discussion: Taking Responsibility for the Enemy

Taking responsibility for an enemy is a major phrase that has been mentioned regularly in the secondary source computed by Linahan Jane. The book is entitled Sermon on the mount and the creation of peace. Contextually, individuals can use the phrase mentioned above to imply that an individual can regard an enemy as a friend. As mentioned in Mathew, there should be no differences between an enemy and a friend for a true Christian.

Individuals should love their enemies by doing well to them and not repaying for bad deeds. However, the love should not be emotional to extend selfless care among individuals. Similarly, people can compare the phrase to the love of God to his people. People tend to commit sins in their daily lives, but God does not abandon them, implying that God gives his love to the people always regardless of their sins. Through the wisdom that individuals receive from God, they can love their enemies even if they offend them.

Besides, individuals can use the phrase to imply accountability as presented conceptually in Sermon on the Mount. From the Sermon, people have to be concerned and acknowledge the basic rights of humans and the needs of their enemies. The phrase implies that no matter whether dishonest, wicked, or ungrateful individuals, individuals should love them as per Gods wisdom. For instance, the holy book states that happy people are merciful, for the Lord will show them mercy.

An example is the story of the Good Samaritan in which a man from Samaria showed the Gentile who had been attacked by robbers mercy. Finally, the phrase Taking responsibility for the enemy can generally imply an individual doing good to others. People should make peace among individuals because doing good does not cost an individuals life.

Conclusively, the Franciscan values discussed are comparatively linked to the idea of taking the enemys responsibility. According to Franciss context, he mainly aimed at seeking peace between Christianity and Islam religion. In this situation, the Muslims were seen as enemies since Francis believed that Christianity was the way of peace used by Jesus Himself. The key value addressed is peacemaking presented by Francis, which was focused during the Sermon on the Mount when Jesus said that happy are those who are peacemakers for they shall be called Gods children.