Category: Public health

This assignment requires you to reflect on the identified public health issue (H

This assignment requires you to reflect on the identified public health issue (High Blood Pressure) that was discussed in your first assignment and Proceed to develop a plan for a detailed health needs assessment to be undertaken, identifying priorities, supporting stakeholders, partners and community members.
Your plan should enable all involved to agree on the scale and impact of needs identified, to decide and prioritise on key interventions that could be designed for that local population.
You would need to draw upon and use the key tools and processes discussed on how to undertake a health needs assessment in the module.
For this assignment, you are directed to follow the guidelines outlined below:
-Background
-Outline of the Health Needs Assessment Process
-A Gantt Chart
(Download Gantt Chart Template)
-Recommendations on How Interventions Would be Agreed

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Create 3 qualitative questions (no yes/no questions), including 3 probe questions stemming from the original 3 questions, to ask a participant during an interview discussing “What are participants’ perceptions of how COVID-19 was managed in their community?”
Probing questions are designed to encourage deep thought about a specific topic. They are typically open-ended questions, meaning the answers are primarily subjective. Probing questions are intended to promote critical thinking as well as to get the person asked to explore their thoughts and feelings about a particular subject.Examples: what do you think is at the root of the problem?, what is your biggest fear regarding this?, etc.
Requirements: 3 qualitative, open ended questions and 3 probe questions, complete sentences Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format | .doc file

Please outline each section
Healthcare providers at Oxford Nursing Home (P) , w

Please outline each section
Healthcare providers at Oxford Nursing Home (P) , will an evidence-based implementation on improving Job satisfaction among health care providers at Oxford Nursing Home(I) , reduce burnout rate and turnover rate (O) over a period of 12 weeks ?
Current and Future State Comparison and Measurable Outcomes
SITE: OXFORD NURSING HOME
• Compare the current state (40% turnover, staff do not stay up to 6 months)in the organization to the desired future state(Improvement).
o Refine and include your previous descriiption of current activities, including information on departments or teams involved, a history of each activity’s success, and how they relate to initiatives, policies, or strategic plans.
o Describe desired future state activities, highlighting the positive changes in roles, teams, tools, processes, and other improvements when anticipated success is achieved.
o Describe improvements as they relate to success in the population, initiatives, policies, or strategic plans and the prevention of negative consequences related to the challenge.
o Compare current state baseline measures to desired future state measures of success.
• Identify anticipated outcomes for one best evidence-based improvement intervention.
o Describe the primary outcome and any others that will be analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of the improvement intervention.
• Identify additional anticipated outcomes for the desired future state.
o Describe outcomes that illustrate successful progress toward improved activities in the desired future state.
o Describe outcomes related to improvements in the population, initiatives, policies, or strategic plans and prevented negative consequences.
• Define SMART objectives for each identified measurable outcome.
o Develop a smart objective based on your PICOT question.
o Develop smart objectives for each additional outcome you identified.
o .
o Describe how each objective relates to the project’s PICOT question elements.
• Address the appropriate audience, using familiar, discipline-specific language and terminology.

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
This assignment will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading rubric.
Create your essay using Microsoft Word, which is the required format for all Chamberlain documents.
The length of the paper is to be no less than 4 full pages from top to bottom and no greater than 5 full pages from top to bottom, excluding title and reference pages.
APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface).Note: Introduction—write an introduction but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association.
Review the readings, lesson notes, and digital media about healthcare policy and use the rubric to develop your paper
QUESTION:
This policy analysis paper will address the problems which lies within policies that impact the access to HIV/AIDS screenings and preventative treatments.
Healthcare Policy Analysis Paper Grading Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem StatementDefine the problem to be analyzed. Include a brief description of the problem along with a well-stated problem statement. The problem statement should address its effect on the health of populations. The statement can be a neutral statement or a value-driven statement that provides information on the direction that the policy analysis may take.
45 ptsMeets All Criteria
Defines the problem to be analyzed well and includes a brief description of the problem along with a well-stated problem statement. The problem statement addresses its effect on the health of populations. The statement is either a neutral statement or a value-driven statement that provides information on the direction that the policy analysis may take.
39 ptsMeets Most Criteria
Defines the problem to be analyzed and includes a brief description of the problem along with a well-stated problem statement. The problem statement addresses its effect on the health of populations. It does not provide information on the direction that the policy analysis may take.
34 ptsPartially Meets Criteria
Problem is not clearly defined nor analyzed. The problem statement does not clearly address its effect on the health of populations or the direction that the policy analysis may take.
0 ptsDoes Not Meet Criteria
Problem is not clearly defined nor analyzed. No problem statement included.
45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBackgroundIn this section, the problem is defined in more detail that outlines any adverse effect on the health of populations. Vital statistics can be used to provide evidence that the problem indeed has an effect on the health of populations. In this section, you want the seriousness of the problem to be evident to the reader. Scientific data from studies, pertinent laws, and cost impact and financing can be included to indicate the depth of the problem. If there are any ethical considerations, these can be included in this section. Provide enough factual information that highlights the seriousness of the problem.
48 ptsMeets All Criteria
Problem is clearly defined in detail and outlines adverse effects on the health of populations. Vital statistics are used to provide evidence that the problem indeed has an effect on the health of populations. Seriousness of the problem is evident to the reader. The depth of the problem is evident by scientific data from studies, pertinent laws, cost impact, and financing. If present, ethical considerations are included. Provides enough factual information that highlights the seriousness of the problem.
41 ptsMeets Most Criteria
Problem is clearly defined in detail and outlines adverse effects on the health of populations. Vital statistics are used to provide evidence that the problem indeed has an effect on the health of populations. Seriousness of the problem is evident to the reader. The depth of the problem is not adequately supported by scientific data from studies, pertinent laws, cost impact, and financing.
36 ptsPartially Meets Criteria
Problem is not clearly defined in enough detail to outline adverse effects on the health of populations. Minimal vital statistics are used to provide evidence that the problem indeed has an effect on the health of populations. Minimal scientific data from studies, pertinent laws, cost impact, and financing are used.
0 ptsDoes Not Meet Criteria
Problem is not clearly defined in enough detail to outline adverse effects on the health of populations. No vital statistics are used to provide evidence that the problem indeed has an effect on the health of populations. Minimal scientific data from studies, pertinent laws, cost impact, and financing are used.
48 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLandscapeDiscuss the key stakeholders and their positions as they relate to political, social, and economic factors. The purpose of the Landscape section is to provide the reader with information about the key stakeholders and their positions on the problem.
50 ptsMeets All Criteria
Key stakeholders and their positions as they relate to political, social, and economic factors are thoroughly discussed so that the reader has an adequate amount of information about the key stakeholders and their positions on the problem.
43 ptsMeets Most Criteria
Key stakeholders are identified, however, their positions as they relate to political, social, and economic factors are not thoroughly discussed so that the reader does not have an adequate amount of information about the key stakeholders and their positions on the problem.
38 ptsPartially Meets Criteria
Key stakeholders are not clearly identified nor are their positions as they relate to political, social, and economic factors. Some amount of information about the key stakeholders and their positions on the problem is evident.
0 ptsDoes Not Meet Criteria
Key stakeholders are not clearly identified nor are their positions as they relate to political, social, and economic factors. An adequate amount of information about the key stakeholders and their positions on the problem is missing.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOptionsDescribe and analyze two laws, bills, acts, regulations or mandates that address the public health issue. The policies must address the best course of action in alleviating the public health issue you identified. Consider the outcomes of the policies as to how well they address the public health issue (1). This includes presenting the pros and cons of each policy (2). The pros and cons for each policy can be analyzed by cost, political feasibility, legality, fairness, timeliness, or targeted impact (3). How the policies will be evaluated needs to be considered with each policy (4).
50 ptsMeets All Criteria
Describe and analyze two laws, bills, acts, regulations or mandates that address the public health issue. The description of the policies includes the best course of action in alleviating the public health issue identified. The outcomes of the policies as to how well they address the public health issue is included along with presenting the pros and cons of each policy. The pros and cons for each policy are analyzed by cost, political feasibility, legality, fairness, timeliness, or targeted impact.
43 ptsMeets Most Criteria
Describe and analyze two laws, bills, acts, regulations or mandates in 3 of the areas for analysis. The 4th area is general.
38 ptsPartially Meets Criteria
Description and analysis is general for each law, bill, act, regulation, or mandate in 2 to 3 of the areas of analysis or is missing 1 area of analysis.
0 ptsDoes Not Meet Criteria
Description and analysis of each law, bill, act, regulation, or mandate is general or vague in all areas of analysis and is missing 2 or more of the areas of analysis
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendationsOffer one option from the two presented that best addresses the problem. If you think neither option best addresses the problem, you can make a recommendation supported by scholarly literature. Discuss the outcomes of the selected option carefully and provide reasons as to why this is the best option to pursue.
50 ptsMeets All Criteria
Offers one clear option from the two presented that best addresses the problem. If you think neither option best addresses the problem, a recommendation supported by scholarly literature is provided. Discusses the outcomes of the selected option carefully and provides reasons as to why this is the best option to pursue.
43 ptsMeets Most Criteria
Offers one clear option that best addresses the problem. Does not discuss the outcomes of the selected option. Provides reasons as to why this is the best option to pursue.
38 ptsPartially Meets Criteria
Offers one clear option that best addresses the problem. Does not discuss the outcomes of the selected option adequately and does not provide adequate reasons as to why this is the best option to pursue.
0 ptsDoes Not Meet Criteria
The option is not clearly discussed and does not link well with the problem. Does not discuss the outcomes of the selected option and does not provide adequate reasons as to why this is the best option to pursue.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA FormatAll information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in the manuscript and listed in the references using APA format:
1. Document setup
2. Title and reference pages
3. Citations in the text and references.
14 ptsMeets All Criteria
APA properly formatted with no more than one error.
12 ptsMeets Most Criteria
Some APA errors in formatting with two to three errors.
11 ptsPartially Meets Criteria
APA formatting contains four or more errors.
0 ptsDoes Not Meet Criteria
APA formatting is not present, or there are five or more errors in formatting.
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of WritingUse of standard English grammar and sentence structure demonstrating primary referencing and original thought. No spelling errors or typographical errors. Organized around the required components using appropriate headers.
28 ptsMeets All Criteria
Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammatical errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.
24 ptsMeets Most Criteria
Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammatical errors. Generally organized thoughts and concepts.
21 ptsPartially Meets Criteria
Language needs development or lack of original thought evident. Four or five spelling and/or grammatical errors.
0 ptsDoes Not Meet Criteria
Language lacks development and a lack of original thought is evident. Multiple spelling and/or grammatical errors.
28 pts
Total Points: 285
Requirements: 4-5 Full Pages From Top to Bottom Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.
Please be sure to use credible or scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.

Your final report should be a well-crafted and thoughtfully written paper in APA

Your final report should be a well-crafted and thoughtfully written paper in APA style. This paper is not meant to be a repetition of your weekly logs. It should be a reflection of how your overall experience will help shape your career choices. The major objective is for you to think critically about the experience.
I have attached the logs and what the internship was about
Internship was at Broadstreet Institute- Maternal Health Track
Section 1—Summarize your APE experience in 2-4 sentences. Then evaluate how the APE related to course work taken prior to your experience and to your concentration (track). Did the APE confirm or contradict information obtained through course work? Did your course work aid you in having a successful experience? How? Describe how the APE changed or confirmed your perception of what you will be doing after graduation.
Section 2—Assess how your responsibilities during the APE assisted the organization and how it tied in with the principle functions of the organization. Describe your most important responsibilities and why they were significant. What surprised you about the APE, if anything? What was the most important thing you learned from the APE?
Section 3—Relate how the APE ties in with your career objectives. Did the experience strengthen or weaken your commitment to pursue a particular career? What insights to the career were provided? Did the experience give you what you were hoping it would? Why or why not? What challenges did you experience during your internship? How did you overcome these challenges? What has inspired you? How has your own privilege/background come into play during your internship?
Section 4—Evaluate the organization which you were involved with. Were there any successful or ineffective business practices? If so, give examples. Were there any ethical issues which you were aware of? Explain if necessary. What was the work environment like? Was time management an issue—good or bad? How did the organizational system work in your setting? Was there a noticeable hierarchy? What did you notice about diversity in your workplace? Describe how your APE provided you opportunities to network, collaborate and learn new skills.
Section 5—In conclusion, rate the level of your experience. What could have been done to improve your experience? How would you advise other students preparing to go into the field? What could be done to improve this course?

Major Report – Equity Focused Health Impact Assessment
Assessment Type Report
T

Major Report – Equity Focused Health Impact Assessment
Assessment Type Report
To facilitate students in gaining prac cal and work-integrated experience in a core area of public health prac ce, all students will undertake a desk-based research project applying equity-focused health impact assessment (EFHIA) of a program/ policy/ strategy/ proposal/ plan (i.e., an ‘ini a ve’) from the list provided or of their own choice (must be approved by Course Coordinator).
As part of the project, students will screen, scope, iden fy, and assess poten al impacts of their chosen ini a ve and form dra recommenda ons from an equity and health focus. Throughout this project, students will learn and apply the key skills of cri cal reading, cri cal appraisal, academic reading and academic wri ng, researching ar cles, evidence-based impact assessment, and preparing evidence-based and ac on focussed recommenda ons.
This is an amazing opportunity for students to prac cally apply the knowledge and skills that they have acquired during the course and their program to an exis ng public health issue. Their project report can then be forma ed as a manuscript and submi ed to a peer-review journal for publica on or converted into a policy brief and submi ed to relevant ministries.
A er the comple on of the report, students may also add this research project to their CVs or resumes as their research project in applied EFHIA.
Descrip on
This will be a ‘Desk-based Rapid EFHIA’, where the chosen ini a ve will be assessed on how it may differen ally impact different vulnerable groups, especially whether nega ve impacts (e.g., loca ng a new factory, removing transport subsidies for school children) may be experienced more strongly by one group than others.
More details about the EFHIA are present in Week8 – 9
The framework for conduc ng EFHIA is also given in the above learning materials.
Length
4000 words, exclusive of references and tables
Due Date
20-Augest @11:59 pm Australian Eastern Daylight Time (AEDT)
Submission Method
Online, via Turnitin AI detector will be used
Assessment Criteria
Rubric
PUBH 6302 Major Report on health Impact Assessment
PUBH 6302 Major Report on health Impact Assessment
CriteriaRatingsPoints
1. Screening (7 marks)
view longer description
7 to >6 pts
Exceeds Expectation
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the ‘Screening’ process to identify potential equity focused health impacts. Addresses ALL the core questions, while discussing the context & content of policy/prog, target population, stakeholders, with emphasis on equity dimensions. Appropriately identifies opportunities for change & justifies recommendations.
6 to >4.5 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates a good understanding ‘Screening’ process to identify potential equity focused health impacts. Gives some information about content & context of the policy/ prg. Addresses SOME key core questions: identifying differentially distributed, potential health impacts in a target population. Appropriately discusses Equity issues and justifies the recommendations.
4.5 to >3 pts
Satisfactory
Demonstrates a reasonable attempt to discuss the ‘Screening’ process to identify potential equity focused health impacts. Discusses equity dimensions of health impacts and addresses at least ONE core question.
3 to >0 pts
Not Satisfactory
An unacceptable effort, including non-completion. Step does not include any equity focus of health impacts
/ 7 pts
2. Scoping (7 marks)
view longer description
7 to >6 pts
Exceeds Expectation
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the ‘Scoping’ process to establish the scope of health impacts by discussing ALL the components of ‘WHAT’, ‘WHO’ & ‘HOW’. Also, addresses ALL the core questions and presents their project plan and methods comprehensively.
6 to >4.5 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates a good understanding of the ‘Scoping’ process to establish the scope of health impacts by discussing SOME components of ALL 3 – ‘WHAT’, ‘WHO’ & ‘HOW’. Presents answers to SOME key core questions using their equity lens: Proposing causal pathways for health impacts, defining core values, steering committee and methods used to gather information.
4.5 to >3 pts
Satisfactory
Demonstrates a reasonable attempt to discuss the ‘Scoping’ process. Answers at least ONE core question using the equity lens. Of WHAT, WHO & HOW, discusses at least TWO of them
3 to >0 pts
Not Satisfactory
An unacceptable effort, including non-completion. Step does not include any component of WHAT, WHO & HOW.
/ 7 pts
3. Impact Identification (10 marks)
view longer description
10 to >9 pts
Exceeds Expectation
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the process of analysing the chosen policy/ prog with focus on target population. Presents thoroughly researched evidence base discussing relationship b/w policy/prg, target population and health impacts. Critically appraises this information and other information sources outlined in previous step. Discusses ALL the components of policy analysis while keeping equity as a focus throughout this step.
9 to >7.5 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates a good understanding of the process of analysing the chosen policy/ prog with focus on target population. Presents some form of critically appraised evidence base to demonstrate relationship between health impacts and the target population. Discusses at least TWO components of policy analysis (in addition to profiling population) while keeping equity as focus in this step.
7.5 to >4.5 pts
Satisfactory
Demonstrates a reasonable attempt to discuss this step. Presents SOME evidence-based information in addition to profiling population. However, in-depth discussion (with evidence) about relationship between policy, impact and population is missing.
4.5 to >0 pts
Not Satisfactory
An unacceptable effort, including non-completion. Step does not include any evidence- based research and target population profiling.
/ 10 pts
4. Impact Assessment (10 marks)
view longer description
10 to >9 pts
Exceeds Expectation
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the process of critically assessing information gathered in Step 3, by addressing ALL the required components. Makes decision about implications of the collected evidence using the equity perspective. Maps/ assesses these findings thoroughly & in a clear way. Also prioritizes the impacts accordingly, while maintaining the equity focus throughout this step.
9 to >7.5 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates a good understanding of the process of critically assessing information gathered in Step 3. Presents SOME assessment on impacts of policy from the equity perspective. Maps / critically assesses the evidence and answers at least SOME core questions. Demonstrates a good attempt at prioritizing the impacts.
7.5 to >4.5 pts
Satisfactory
Demonstrates a reasonable attempt to discuss this step, by critically assessing evidence gathered in Step 3. Addresses at least TWO core questions, in addition to prioritizing the impacts. Keep a focus on equity.
4.5 to >0 pts
Not Satisfactory
An unacceptable effort, including non-completion. Step does not include any impact assessment and prioritizing.
/ 10 pts
5. Recommendation (6 marks)
view longer description
6 to >5 pts
Exceeds Expectation
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of this step by presenting solution based recommendations for the chosen policy/ program. Addresses ALL the components of this step and delivers practical, clear & achievable priority actions, strongly supporting the claims made throughout the HIA. ALL the recommendations are based on evidence collected from national /global resources.
5 to >4 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of this step by presenting SOME solution based recommendations for the chosen policy/ program. Presents at least ONE evidence- based recommendation for each health impact. However may not have recommendations for each target group (e.g. 3 identified health impacts in 3 target groups  3 recommendations for 2 target groups).Recommendations are evidence-based and have a potential to limit inequality issues identified throughout HIA.
4 to >3 pts
Satisfactory
Demonstrates a reasonable attempt to present ONE recommendation for >50% of identified health impacts for at least ONE target population group (e.g. 3 identified impacts for 3 target groups  1 recommendations for 1 target group)
3 to >0 pts
Not Satisfactory
An unacceptable effort, including non-completion.
/ 6 pts
6. Structure, clarity & Referencing (5 marks)
view longer description
5 to >4 pts
Exceeds Expectation
Presents a perfectly prepared report with ALL the required components.
4 to >3 pts
Meets Expectation
Presents a good report with clear structure and proper referencing. Has MAJORITY of required components. Marks deducted for exceeding word limits and copy pasting.
3 to >2 pts
Satisfactory
Presents a reasonable report with SOME structure and clarity. Uses references properly. Marks deducted for exceeding word limits and copy pasting.
2 to >0 pts
Not Satisfactory
An unacceptable effort, including non-completion. Marks deducted for exceeding word limits and copy pasting.
/ 5 pts
Total points: 0

Working in small groups assigned by the instructor, students will examine one re

Working in small groups assigned by the instructor, students will examine one recreation/leisure based theories or concepts. This theory will be
Serious Leisure
Your group will be required to include the following topics:Tools/research methods used to capture theory/concept
Examples of research this theory was used in
Note:
Typed 12pt font, and double spaced. Figures, tables, charts, pictures, and graphics may be used where appropriate within the report (not included in the page count) or may be added as an appendix. All tables and charts must be reproduced in an original form (Do not use direct downloads). For ease of readership, include a table of contents, page numbers, headings, and subheadings.
– Your paper need to include at least 2 outside sources in APA style.
– Be aware of plagiarism (<30% in turnitin) - Include page number, table of content, headings, and subheadings Requirements: 2 pages | .doc file

The Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBSS) is a national survey monitoring health be

The Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBSS) is a national survey monitoring health behavior among youth and young adults. It is administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). For this assignment, use the “Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System Dataset” provided to practice calculating and interpreting the t-test. Refer to the instructional videos in the topic Resources and the Using and Interpreting Statistics: A Practical Text for the Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences textbook as a guide.
Part 1
Refer to the topic Resources to review the documentation, questionnaires, and general information pertaining to the YRBS. Then use the 2019 “Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System Dataset” and conduct a two-sample t-test to determine if weight (in kg) differs by sex.
Part 2
Create an 8-10-slide PowerPoint presentation to discuss the findings for either the chi-square or correlation. Create a voice-over or a video presentation that is 5-7 minutes in length. Your slides should be shown on the screen as you present. Loom may be used (You must use your GCU email address to access all the features for Loom). Other options are Zoom or the recording feature in PowerPoint. Include an additional slide for the link with your selected method of presentation at the beginning and an additional slide for references at the end.
Include the following:
Explain why the t-test you chose is most appropriate for analyzing the data and whether the assumptions were met.
What are the null and alternative hypotheses for this scenario?
What is the critical value? What is the decision rule?
Per the output, what is the test statistic and p-value?
Interpretation of the t-test results (What was done? What was found? What does it mean? What suggestions are there for the creation of a health promotion intervention?).
General Requirements
Make sure to unzip your data set before importing to SPSS and completing the analysis. Submit the SPSS exported output (Part 1) and the PowerPoint (Part 2) to the assignment dropbox.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Conduct a research on one of the top fifteen health care organizations in the U.

Conduct a research on one of the top fifteen health care organizations in the U.S.
Your research should include the following questions:
How will you find listings of the top fifteen health care systems?
What are the various components of the selected health care system? How does it rank in terms of reduced mortality and infection rates?
What are the services provided by the healthcare delivery system?
What are the current trends contributing to the high ranking and the future path of this health care organization?
How does the organization manage and distribute resources for improved patient care?

This assignment will culminate in the design of a comprehensive work plan that p

This assignment will culminate in the design of a comprehensive work plan that provides a bird’s-eye view of the entire strategic planning process. Please follow the assignment instructions and work plan template enclosed. Thank you