Category: Public Administration

Please see attachment below for Instructions and the attached PowerPoint to be u

Please see attachment below for Instructions and the attached PowerPoint to be used as source
PAPER 13 PAGES NOT including cover and references.

Please complete this. If you are not 100% sure of an answer, leave a * next to t

Please complete this. If you are not 100% sure of an answer, leave a * next to the question so I can do more research. Attached is the assignment and some papers I have written for the course, hopefully this helps a little.

Please read the following feedback and provide a couple pages [worth] of edits.

Please read the following feedback and provide a couple pages [worth] of edits. Please highlight the edited portions: “I gave you 66/70 (94%) on your final presentation. Great job! You all spoke very clearly and well throughout the presentation and it was within the time limits. I took one point off from the format/flow of the presentation (out of 10) because I thought the tables could be better linked to the strategic goals with headers and I was a bit confused about the back and forth between the strategic goals slide and then the three topics that would be covered and then back to the strategic goals slide again. I took 3 points off the main topics due to reasons I will describe in more detail below.

Overall, your presentation did a good job of discussing the organization at a high level. I liked your discussion of the strategic plan but it could be linked back more closely to the tables you included as they are the metrics by which the organization are measuring their performance. Is there a table for all of the goals? Are there both internal elements of the goals as well as external elements? How are they measured? For example, EDI is internal when looking at strategic human resources management, but how are they measuring the policies in terms of EDI in their external work (programs and policies)? I was also a bit unclear as to what the first 2 or 3 tables were describing so please make sure that this is very clear in your final paper.”

**Please review Assignment Instructions in files attached for full details**
Co

**Please review Assignment Instructions in files attached for full details**
Consider the following questions based on the Shefali Roy (2017) TED Talk: What happens when the ethics of an organization come into conflict with one’s ethical commitments? When something done within an organization—or done to others by that organization—is in conflict with their personal moral code, how should an employee, or volunteer connected to that organization, respond?
Write and post a briefing paper (300–400 words) in which you:
-Briefly identify a case study in which that conflict existed/exists. The case study can be real or fictional.
-Describe the response that allows compliance with professional ethics while maintaining personal moral commitments.
-Provide references.
*Note: Use the “Core Components” and “Checklist” sections of Herman’s (2012) “White Papers and Briefing Books: A Communications Program Workshop” as a general guide. You do not need to include an Executive Summary or Appendices for this Discussion.

Using the case attached and at least two outside sources:
Briefly describe the f

Using the case attached and at least two outside sources:
Briefly describe the facts of the case leading up to Bennett being terminated.
While supporting facts are necessary for the story to flow, you should concentrate your efforts on the facts that are most important related to whether Bennett was retaliated against for protected First Amendment speech.
Using this case and at least two outside sources, thoroughly explain the balance between the public employee’s freedom of speech and the public employer’s right to require limits to that speech.
Explain what this case tells us about the public employee’s rights related to free speech.
Finally, this case mentions the due process rights HCC afforded Bennett. Using our readings, explain why public employees like Bennett are afforded due process, where that requirement comes from, and what is generally considered adequate due process.
Teachers feedback:
Not sure you followed the directions for this assignment. Take another look at the assignment and the 4 major points you needed to cover below, you didn’t really cover any of this.
Would also still need atleast 2 sources. I can re submit the ones from the prior writer or if you need new ones and look yourself. Either or let me know if you need anything else. Thank you

Prepare a memo to the appropriate policy making body that
identifies a defined p

Prepare a memo to the appropriate policy making body that
identifies a defined public sector problem,
at least two potential policy options that address the problem, and
at least two areas in which additional research will be conducted to address the public sector problem.
This should be an agenda item to the appropriate policy-making body (i.e., audience). Depending on the scope of the problem you identified, this could be to the federal, state, or local (county, city council, etc.) government.
The tone and form of the memo should reflect the audience, and your writing should be clear and concise — the policy makers should be able to discern the purpose early in the memo. The defined problem might also best be addressed by a government agency that regulates or is authorized to enact policy.
In the memo, be sure, at a minimum, to:
Identify and define the problem and the conditions that exist to demonstrate the importance of the problem and why it deserves the attention of policy makers.
Identify and apply (the concepts or ideas and how they would be executed or implemented) at least two policy options to address the problem.
Explain at least two areas in which additional research will be conducted in furtherance of addressing the public sector problem.
In addition to fulfilling the specifics of the assignment, a successful paper must also meet the following criteria:
Length should be 3–5 double-spaced pages, excluding title page and reference page.
Use a memo header segment.
Utilize six or more sources, using both primary and secondary sources and evaluating the credibility of these sources.

To complete your task (or, Paper #3: Community Intervention Proposal), you will

To complete your task (or, Paper #3: Community Intervention Proposal), you will take things step by step in order to put forth the strongest possible proposal that meets the expected criteria (more specifics on that later). The following is a brief overview of the steps you should take (more specifics on your step-by-step process included on subsequent pages within this Paper 3 module).
Step 1: Identify the needs of your com­munity.
Step 2: Choose programs (and ensure they can be implemented within budget).
Step 3: Prepare your proposal for the City Council (or, instructor) to review.
Step 4: Submit your proposal/report for review (grade).
Note: Once you have your ideas laid out and a draft of your proposal, you are invited to submit your draft (Paper #3: Community Intervention Proposal) for feedback. This step is OPTIONAL (and UNGRADED); but, if you do choose to submit a draft, you are likely to get some valuable feedback from your community (instructor) that will help you further refine and strengthen your final proposal/paper. In order to receive this feedback in a timely manner, plan to submit your draft by the due date indicated.
Readings and Resources
Before getting started on your paper, you should review all of the information located in this module, Paper #3: Community Intervention Proposal Instructions and Resources. In this module, you will find the following resources:
Steps 1-4: These pages will provide a brief overview of the steps you should take for planning for and writing your proposal.
Paper #3 Templates/Worksheets and Examples: You will find templates/worksheets to assist you as you work through your paper. Examples will be provided to use as a reference.
Paper #3 – Frequently Asked Questions: This provides questions you may have about the paper, grading, etc.
PAPER #3 ASSIGNMENTS: Each of the assignment deliverables will be found within this module as well as the corresponding lesson modules in which they are due. See the following Assignments section for a list of the deliverables.
Comments from Customer
Discipline: HDFS adolescent development

Review “How Good People Make Tough Choices”, including the two brief case studie

Review “How Good People Make Tough Choices”, including the two brief case studies in Kidder (1995/2005) regarding a reference librarian and a new plant manager of a nationwide manufacturing firm (pages 13–16).
Choose the ethical dilemma of either the reference librarian or new plant manager. Compare the ways that an advocate of Kant’s categorical imperatives and Bentham and Mill’s utilitarian philosophy would counsel the librarian or the new plant manager to act. With which approach do you agree most? Why?

Describe how public policy regarding the environment has evolved at the state a

Describe how public policy regarding the environment has evolved at the state and federal levels since the 1970s.
Describe aspects of environmental politics that surprised you while reading the case studies on mountaintop removal and sea level rise.
Explain key structural and process issues that affect environmental policy.
Include appropriate reference to the assigned readings to support your statements.
Apply correct APA citations and format to your response.

Explanation: The purpose of the final Power Point presentation is to demonstra

Explanation: The purpose of the final Power Point presentation is to demonstrate an understanding of the material learned over the semester. Be sure you use good grammar, correct spelling, and that the presentation is visually interesting and appealing.

Steps for maximum points

1. Choose an organization (whether it is a nonprofit, union, association or business group) AND a specific issue they are actively lobbying in this current congress. [ i.e., National Federation of Independent Business, The Main Street Certainty Act, H.R. 4721/ S.B. 1706].

A. Begin your Power Point explanation on the bill (date introduced, main co-sponsor, # of cosponsors, legislative action, partisanship, history, and likely next step(s) for action.

B. Detail information about the group you chose pushing for its passage. Detail the size of the group, # of members, its history, known lobbying tools, and your sense of whether the bill is really a priority for the organization.

C. List any coalitions that are either already involved in the advocacy campaign or outline some groups you would recruit and why they would join (what is their self-interest).

D. Highlight up to three advocacy tools you would like to use to move the legislation forward. Explain how each would be used to move you forward to impact your ultimate goal of getting the legislation signed into law.

E. Conclude the PowerPoint with observations of external events that could be challenging or any other relevant observation you have.