Overview: Please submit a one-page personal reflection evaluating your learning

Overview:
Please submit a one-page personal reflection evaluating your learning

Overview:
Please submit a one-page personal reflection evaluating your learning and growth throughout the course of this semester.
Use 12-point font (Times New Romans, Calibri, or Arial), double-spaced, 1″ margins, and indent all paragraphs.
Requirements:
Here are some questions to consider. However, please note that you DO NOT have to incorporate answers to every single question into your reflection. Please do not exceed 1 page.
How has this course made you think differently about technology as it pertains to school leadership?
How has this course made you think differently about integrating technology in your school?
What might you do differently after having taken this course?
How have you grown as a person and/or as an educator over the course of this term?
This is and techonolgy class

You will be responsible for handing in a final scholarly paper on a topic relat

You will be responsible for handing in a final scholarly paper on a topic relat

You will be responsible for handing in a final scholarly paper on a topic related to the course content. You must demonstrate awareness of relevant theoretical frameworks and concepts examined in class through their application to a specific issue that you chose.  
 
You can select an anti-racism issue related to children and youth (e.g., racism in the media, criminal justice, education, Islamophobia, antisemitism, critical race theory, school to prison pipeline, Black Lives Matter, systemic anti-racism, youth activism, mixed racial adoptions, restorative justice, indigeneity and historical implications, teacher training and anti-racism, immigrant children and racism, model minority myth, achievement gap, racism in animation, microaggression etc.) 
 
The final term essay is to be submitted online through BRIGHTSPACE by 11:59 pm on August 12th 2024.  It must have a title page that includes the course name, my name, your name, and student number. You are expected to keep a copy of your essay in case of a problem opening it. Essays submitted after the due date will be docked 5% per day and this includes weekends, unless you have a good reason for being late and/or an extension has been granted at least three days in advance.
 
Form and Style
Your research paper should be 10-12 pages double-spaced (not including cover page, headings, and references), with regular margins (1″on each side and 1″ top and bottom) set up) and 12 point type.Please don’t add an extra space between paragraphs (this means that you will have to indicate paragraphs by indenting the first line), please number the essay’s pages. The paper will have 5% deducted for each page (pro-rated) that falls under the minimum required and 2% for each page more than one page over the maximum.  It should be submitted in Microsoft word not a pdf or notepad.

Support how questions/statements provided are grounded in the literature. Sour

Support how questions/statements provided are grounded in the literature.
Sour

Support how questions/statements provided are grounded in the literature.
Sources must be correctly listed on a references page using APA  7 format at the end of the paper. The sources must be recent (within the past five years) scholarly research journal articles related to the project topic (reading).

Support how questions/statements provided are grounded in the literature. An exa

Support how questions/statements provided are grounded in the literature.
An exa

Support how questions/statements provided are grounded in the literature.
An example of how questions/statements provided should be grounded in the literature will be shared.
Sources must be correctly listed on a references page using APA  7 format at the end of the paper. The sources must be recent (within the past five years) scholarly research journal articles related to the project topic (reading).

Strong teams are led by people who set clear expectations and help the team to a

Strong teams are led by people who set clear expectations and help the team to a

Strong teams are led by people who set clear expectations and help the team to adhere to a communal set of ethical standards. Strong teams also have a culture that allows team members to hold one another accountable.
Create an 8-slide powerpoint presentation for student affairs professionals on accountability, including the following:
Legal and ethical standards of practice for student affairs professionals
Strategies and challenges of applying expectations consistently among team members
Strategies to create an environment where staff feel comfortable addressing violations in communal standards
The digital presentation should be visually appealing and include speaker notes, title page, and reference slides. Support your presentation with 3-5 scholarly resources.

Using the data from your PLC Assessment instrument, devise a plan that you would

Using the data from your PLC Assessment instrument, devise a plan that you would

Using the data from your PLC Assessment instrument, devise a plan that you would present to faculty or colleagues in an effort to promote buy-in in order to address the problem identified in the assessment findings. 
Your plan should be approximately 4 pages and the format can be an expanded outline rather than straight narrative.  In other words, you can use bulleted information rather than paragraph format.  The crucial part in this report is the details you provide.
Your plan can NOT be a one-shot plan (something you do one time on one day like at a faculty meeting).  The plan needs to be sustainable over time such as a semester or 9 weeks or school year, etc. 
 Here are the categories to include in your plan and some ideas for what to include in your plan within each category.  Also, look at the scoring rubric for more help.
1.  Group(s).  Include who, how selected, and why.  Provide details about these members. Give a very clear picture of the makeup of the groups. 
2. Schedule.  Make your schedule of when these groups meet very detailed.  Include information related to how your school schedule has been taken into consideration.  Make this part about the time frame easy to read and follow. 
3.  Needs Assessment and Rationale.  You need to have a clear and detailed explanation of how the goal(s) of the project were determined.  How you used data should be included.  Information regarding the knowledge and skills needs of the teachers should be in this section. 
4.  Budget and Resources.  You cannot start professional development without a budget and knowledge of resources available.  Provide a detailed budget.  Include specific names and contact information regarding consultants or other resource personnel that you may be using in your plan.
 5. Professional Development Plan to Meet the Goals and Objectives.  This part should provide extensive and detailed professional development relating to instructional strategies aligned to the goals and objectives. In other words, this is what you are going to do, how this is aligned to your goals and objectives and how will you know you met the goals.
6.  Dysfunctions.  Identify two of the five dysfunctions your team is most likely to be susceptible.  In detail, describe your plan to avoid these pitfalls.

1) Read Chapter 4 in your textbook, which can be accessed at this link or in PDF

1) Read Chapter 4 in your textbook, which can be accessed at this link or in PDF

1) Read Chapter 4 in your textbook, which can be accessed at this link or in PDF format in module 4. 
2) After you have read the chapter, create a post and discuss the ISTE Standards for Education Leaders and the Future Ready Framework.
Discuss these 2 topics by answering number 4 in your textbook:
How does the culture of your school or district align with elements identified in the ISTE Standards and Future Ready Framework? Where is improvement needed?
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.lsus.idm.oclc.org/lib/lsus/reader.action?docID=6261693&ppg=82

Every year institutions engage in a faculty renewal and tenure process. The proc

Every year institutions engage in a faculty renewal and tenure process. The proc

Every year institutions engage in a faculty renewal and tenure process. The process, for the most part, includes a structured process and related procedures in conducting the reviews. For this discussion, you will assume the role of the faculty leader who has been asked to review select recommendations rendered by the tenure/renewal committee.
One of the recommendations sent for your review was to not renew a contract of a fellow colleague. You are stunned and a bit lost as to why and how the committee recommended the nonrenewal, since the faculty member seemed to be established and well liked within the institution. You must now convene a meeting of your fellow faculty members to review the recommendations and either agree or disagree with the outcome. Keep in mind, you are working inside an organization that considers colleagues to be equal partners. As you begin to prepare your opening remarks for your upcoming meeting, please consider the following:
As a collegial organization, what main elements would you expect to be included in the college’s contract renewal process?
What are some of your challenges of balancing the recommendation versus upholding the culture of the college?
How would you communicate to the college at large about the nonrenewal decision?
Now, take the role of faculty member whose contract will not be renewed:
What steps should you take in addressing this employment situation?
How might such decisions challenge the collegial culture of the institution?
Reference
Manning, K. (2018). Organizational theory in higher education (2nd ed.). Routledge.

10 interview questions are required, and each must be grounded in the topic lite

10 interview questions are required, and each must be grounded in the topic lite

10 interview questions are required, and each must be grounded in the topic literature (Reading proficiency-Education). The submission must include at least five unique sources/citations. Sources must be correctly listed on a references page using the current APA 7 format at the end of the paper. The sources must be recent (within the past five years) scholarly research journal articles related to the project topic.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Questions will be attached.