Times New Roman, size: 12, 1,5 spacing 3 page
you should write an analysis intro
Times New Roman, size: 12, 1,5 spacing 3 page
you should write an analysis introduction of euro currency in Croatia
You can do your research ,Be e sure to quote and reference correctly. Build a bibliography at the end of the document.
Zero plagiarism ,Thank you
Your AB should have a minimum of five sources, including one book. The annotated
Your AB should have a minimum of five sources, including one book. The annotated bibliography should include the following for each key source:
a full citation
a concise summary of the text
a statement on the utility of the text for your research.
Critical analysis of each key text is encouraged. Note: Bibliographies differ from works cited insofar as they refer to texts which are relevant or necessary to the research topic or question but may not necessarily be used directly in the final research project as a citation. Accordingly, bibliographies usually contain more references than works cited strictly defined (which only include those sources which end up in the final paper). At a minimum, your AB must include the required number of sources for the final paper (at least five sources outside of required readings, including one book), but a strong AB will have more than this.
Discuss the process of redistricting for the state legislature and the U.S. congressional delegation from Texas and whether it is possible to remove the politics from the process.
Please see attached for additional information and instructions.
Paper question:
Considering the arguments of the philosopher you choose, use you
Paper question:
Considering the arguments of the philosopher you choose, use your paper to address this question: Who should have power and how should they use it to solve or deal with your chosen topic? Why should they have power (that is, what definition of justice are you using)? My chosen topic is: who should have power over the types and quality of food people can access in the US.
You will use a total of four philosophers in this paper. You will make your argument using Plato, Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, or Mill. Then, you will use three of the other philosophers to critique/criticize your argument by presenting the key critique/criticism each would make of your argument, and you will defend your argument against each of those critiques.
Guidelines:
Paper must consist of 6 paragraphs: paragraph one is your thesis, paragraph two will be your argument (addressing both justice and power), paragraphs three through five will be your oppositions’ best critiques of your argument and your response (defense) to each of them, paragraph 6 will be your conclusion.
You must underline the thesis sentence in the thesis paragraph and you must underline the topic sentence in each paragraph.
You must use and cite quotations from each of the readings/philosophers covered in the debate. The textbook is: Political Philosophy: The Essential Texts (I have attached the textbook pages in case you do not have them). Failure to use and cite quotations from the textbook reading in the second and all subsequent paragraphs, other than the conclusion paragraph, will result in a paper score of 0 or 1 point. You must have quotations that support claims about justice and power in the second paragraph, and quotations that support each side in the debate/critique paragraphs. That means you must include at least 2 quotations in each paragraph after the thesis paragraph.
Students who in any way incorporate the work of another will receive a grade of 0 on the paper and will be cited for academic dishonesty. This includes undocumented use of the Internet or the work of another student (past or present)
For the philosophical aspects of your paper, you should use only texts assigned for this class. Do not use outside philosophy sources in your paper. You do not need them to succeed on your papers.
Here is the link for the textbook pages: https://we.tl/t-MuqrwcksGw
Reflective Writing : Texas Constitution. Your analysis and essay must be at leas
Reflective Writing : Texas Constitution. Your analysis and essay must be at least 2 pages, in length. This does not include the bibliography.
Here is what you have to do, these links are for me to get the information for t
Here is what you have to do, these links are for me to get the information for the essay, you don’t have to follow the questions, you have to make an essay and guide yourself with the questions that are in the world document
https://www.euronews.com/2019/01/24/explained-the-controversial-name-dispute-between-greece-and-fyr-macedonia
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46938371
http://maps-world.net/europe/yugoslavia.htm
Social Movements are only as important as the person leading them. The person(s)
Social Movements are only as important as the person leading them. The person(s) leading a social movement must have charisma and be able to captivate an audience. Political scientists and historians are taught to analyze body language, especially during debates and speeches.
For this assignment, you will watch Dr Martin Luther King’s I Have a Dream speech https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vP4iY1TtS3s
and a speech by Alicia Garza of the Black Lives Matter movement https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cniRNj6m0-A
and answer questions listed below. Pay special attention to the following aspects in the two speeches.
Importance of body language while delivering the speech.
Gestures, cadence and delivery style.
Answer the following:
Provide a summary of the two speeches.
Compare Dr. King’s leadership, charisma, power and passion to capture his audience to Alicia Garza’s speech. What are the similarities, if any? What are the differences, if any?
How does the location of the speeches support their messaging? Dr. King’s speech was held in a church and at the Lincoln Memorial, whereas today we have social networking and more avenues to relay messages. Does messaging make a difference?
Describe how the audience in Dr. King’s speeches relate to the Alicia Garza’s audience. Do you see a similarity or differences in the speeches and in the audience?
Requirements
Length: 2 pages of substantive content
12 pt font
Parenthetical in-text citations included and formatted in APA style
References page (a minimum of 2 outside scholarly sources plus the textbook and/or the weekly lesson for each course outcome) .
Title page.
No CHATGPT, AI, plagarism, chatbots, etc…
Is globalization a good thing or bad
No CHATGPT, AI, plagarism, chatbots, etc…
Is globalization a good thing or bad? Is it making the world richer or poorer? Does globalization promote international understanding and tolerance, or does it threaten local cultures? Do the benefits of globalization exceed its costs?
(Choose a stance) either the Good Outweighs Bad or Bad Outweighs Good, and defend your claims with factual, economic data.
Must have a works cited in MLA format.
(1) A clear introduction that addresses directly the question posed by the instructor;
(2) A minimum of 700 words, not including works cited;
(3) Source-cited, factual support for all of your claims; Wikipedia is not an appropriate source for academic essays. Plagiary will be penalized.
(4) College-level English.
Attached is the full list of instruction and guidelines but this is a brief sect
Attached is the full list of instruction and guidelines but this is a brief section of them explaining the type of essay: In this essay, you do NOT need to follow some formula about essay writing that you learned in an English composition course. In particular, you do not need some introduction explaining the purpose of the essay (which your reader obviously already knows) or some fancy rhetoric about the importance of voting or such – generally speaking, this is wasted space. Instead, you can just start with “Issue 1: (whatever the issue is)” and begin your exploration of the two parties’ general approaches on these issues. Rinse and repeat on the other two issues. The discussion of each issue should include the reasoning behind each side’s position. For example, what are the general lines of reasoning behind the Democratic and Republican approaches to the issue of reproductive rights? You are also encouraged to include what politicians from each party say about the effects of the other side’s policy stances. For example, surely Democrats would point to evidence showing why they think the abortion bans in various states harm women, and surely Republicans would point to evidence showing what they perceive to be benefits of such policies. YOU ARE IN NO WAY ASKED TO EXPLAIN YOUR OWN VIEW ON THE ISSUES YOU INTRODUCE: What we want is a discussion that elucidates and explains the positions that are commonplace within each party. The more you learn, the more you will develop your own views and opinions for yourself; it is not your responsibility to report your own opinions to your professor, and not your professor’s job to judge your opinions!
Talk about the upcoming government in the UK, the labor party. With updated rece
Talk about the upcoming government in the UK, the labor party. With updated recent and latest information nowadays. Answering the following questions
What is the current situation ?
What is coming and what is expected?
Please include graphs, polls and statistics in the essay .