I am needing a capstone project that analyzes presidential speeches by George W.

I am needing a capstone project that analyzes presidential speeches by George W.

I am needing a capstone project that analyzes presidential speeches by George W. Bush and Barack Obama for dehumanizing military metaphors, and analyzes media coverage (of New York Times and Washington Post archives) around the times of those speeches. 
I have attached what is currently done. 

I submitted a request for my thesis/dissertation to be written a few months ago.

I submitted a request for my thesis/dissertation to be written a few months ago.

I submitted a request for my thesis/dissertation to be written a few months ago. The dissertation I received was very bad and I failed the module. I am submitting for a different writer to write it to a much better standard. I have attached the original marked dissertation that got 35/100 – read the feedback from this and use it to make sure the one that you write is MUCH MUCH better. I also expect a plagrism and ai report to make sure all work is original. 
If you need any further information, please let me know. Below is some structure – but feel free to take it in your own direction. 
Dissertation overview 
Topic Overview: This dissertation will explore the role of blockchain technology in transforming electoral systems. It will delve into the advancements made, the challenges encountered, and the broader implications for democratic governance.
Discourse focus: broadly summarise the academic and/or public discussion around the use of blockchain in democratic elections (e.g., citation analysis of different academic communities, thematic analysis of the different themes covered in these discourse and their relative prevalence, etc. etc.)
Possible Theoretical Debates:
Digital Democracy vs. Traditional Electoral Integrity: Engagement with the debate between proponents of digital democracy, who argue for the transformative potential of blockchain, and traditionalists who emphasize the tried-and-tested methods of electoral integrity. (Exploring this from a tech standpoint)
Techno-optimism vs. Techno-skepticism: Exploring the tension between techno-optimism, which views technology as a panacea for electoral flaws, and techno-skepticism, which warns of over-reliance on technology and potential unforeseen consequences. (Exploring this from a tech standpoint)
Research Questions:
How has blockchain technology been integrated into electoral systems globally?
What are the key challenges faced in implementing blockchain in electoral processes?
In what ways does blockchain technology impact the principles of democratic governance?
Relevant Links/articles/scholarly articles 
Designing an E-Voting Framework Using Blockchain Technology: A Case Study of Oman (currently don’t have access)  – https://www.igi-global.com/article/designing-an-e-voting-framework-using-blockchain-technology/298203
An Analytical View on Political Voting System using Blockchain Technology – UAE Case Study – https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9075074
Process Digitalization using Blockchain: EU Parliament Elections Case Study – https://www.scitepress.org/PublishedPapers/2021/102290/102290.pdf 
Development of a Distributed Blockchain eVoting System – https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3345035.3345080
“Blockchain Technology in Electoral Systems: Advancements, Challenges, and Implications for Democratic Governance”:  Research Methods for Dissertation: “Blockchain Technology in Electoral Systems: Advancements, Challenges, and Implications for Democratic Governance” 
I. Introduction
– Brief overview of the research topic.
– Importance of understanding blockchain technology in electoral systems.
– Statement of research objectives.  
II. Theoretical Framework
– Discussion of theoretical debates surrounding blockchain in electoral systems.
– Formulation of research questions based on theoretical considerations. 
III. Literature Review
– Comprehensive review of existing literature on blockchain technology and its application in electoral systems.
– Identification of gaps in current research and theoretical understanding. 
IV. Research Methodologies
1. **Library Research and Publication Analysis**
– Description of the process of gathering and analyzing academic literature and public documents.
– Explanation of the relevance of library research in understanding the theoretical underpinnings of blockchain technology in elections.
2. **Case Studies**
– Explanation of the methodology for selecting and analyzing case studies of countries implementing blockchain in elections.
– Discussion of the criteria for evaluating the success and challenges of blockchain adoption in electoral processes.
3. **Content and Discourse Analysis**
– Overview of the methods used to conduct content and discourse analysis on media reports, public forums, and academic discourse.
– Explanation of how this analysis contributes to understanding public perception and expert opinions on blockchain in elections.
4. **Surveys and Interviews**
– Description of the process of designing and conducting surveys and interviews with relevant stakeholders.
– Discussion of the importance of gathering primary data to supplement existing knowledge and insights.
5. **Focus Groups**
– Explanation of the rationale for organizing focus group discussions and the methodological approach adopted.
– Identification of the target participants and the themes explored in focus group sessions. 
V. Data Analysis
– Explanation of the analytical techniques employed for each research method.
– Presentation of findings from library research, case studies, content analysis, surveys, interviews, and focus groups.  
VI. Discussion
– Integration of findings to address research questions and theoretical debates.
– Critical analysis of the implications of blockchain technology in electoral systems for democratic governance. 
VII. Conclusion
– Summary of key findings and their implications.
– Recommendations for future research and policy implications.  
VIII. References
– Bibliography of all sources cited in the dissertation.
IX. Appendices
– Supplementary materials such as survey questionnaires, interview transcripts, and additional data analysis.

Analyze the impact of personal attacks in political discourse**: How do personal

Analyze the impact of personal attacks in political discourse**: How do personal

Analyze the impact of personal attacks in political discourse**: How do personal remarks, such as Marjorie Taylor Greene’s comment about Congresswoman Crockett’s eyelashes, affect the tone and productivity of political debates? Consider both short-term and long-term implications on legislative effectiveness and public perception. 
2. **Examine the role of social media in political accountability**: How does the viral nature of Congresswoman Crockett’s response to Greene’s comment reflect the influence of social media on holding politicians accountable for their behavior? Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of this public scrutiny.
How do incidents like this involving personal attacks or insults affect the overall discourse and functioning of the political system?
To what extent do you think politicians bear a responsibility to maintain respectful communication and uphold decorum in their interactions with colleagues, regardless of political differences?Abby Phillip interviews Jasmine Crockett
What strategies or actions could be implemented to promote a more civil and respectful political discourse, particularly in cases where personal attacks or unwarranted comments are made during public debates or discussions? Should there be a zero tolerance policy when someone goes against Robert’s Rules of Order regardless of political party?

Begin by reviewing the videos below. There are many areas of our lives that are

Begin by reviewing the videos below. There are many areas of our lives that are

Begin by reviewing the videos below. There are many areas of our lives that are regulated, controlled, or restricted by the government in an effort to protect the public good.
Assignment
Compose an essay in APA 7th Edition formatting with at least 280 words in length based on what you have learned in the module that addresses the questions below:
Identify at least three areas in our society that pit individual freedoms and choices against protecting the public good, Describe government’s actions to protect the common/public good through policy.
In your opinion, what should be the government’s role? Remember that while I am asking your opinion, it should be an informed opinion. This means your opinion should be supported by facts or data that are appropriately cited.

First, provided the stated problem that you are explaining.(My topic that I have

First, provided the stated problem that you are explaining.(My topic that I have

First, provided the stated problem that you are explaining.(My topic that I have chosen for my pper is the issue of rising cost of healthcare due to pharmaceutical companies)
Second, refer to the paper outline provided in the ‘Files’ section on Canvas to outline your paper. Make sure that you provide important information in each of the sections. You do not need to write this in complete sentences (you can bullet info), but it does need to be thorough. Your outline should be about 200 words. You can write it on a Word Document and then copy/paste it into the text box.
Attached below is the format for the outline

Discuss the media (print, broadcast, radio, social media, any combination or all

Discuss the media (print, broadcast, radio, social media, any combination or all

Discuss the media (print, broadcast, radio, social media, any combination or all), including the history and current trends.
Social media as it relates to news and politics.
Each reference listed in your References section at the bottom of your paper must be cited as an in-text citation within your text. No more than 10% of the paper should be citations. No quotations.
thank y’all!

Pick TWO revolutions out of these three: American, French, Haitian.Write a thesi

Pick TWO revolutions out of these three: American, French, Haitian.Write a thesi

Pick TWO revolutions out of these three: American, French, Haitian.Write a thesis-driven essay that answers the following question in the form of an argument:What is the most significant difference (or similarity) between the “visions” (i.e.,theories, ideas, justifications, etc.) motivating the supporters (and/or critics) of these tworevolutions?Important things to know:- Notice that the prompt asks you to identify one important difference (or similarity). Thisis because it is usually better to be focused and to develop a single line of argument ratherthan try to do too much in your paper. You are allowed to argue that there are twodifferences (or two similarities, or one difference and one similarity), and it’s possible towrite a strong paper doing so. But keep in mind that the more arguments you try toadvance, the less focused the paper as a whole is likely to be. A good paper is clear,coherent, and unified. Remember that your core argument can contain “sub arguments.”

When completing your essay, you must provide in-text citations for any work that

When completing your essay, you must provide in-text citations for any work that

When completing your essay, you must provide in-text citations for any work that is directly quoted or paraphrased. When writing your essay, respond to the prompt thoroughly, and completely.
Your response should be your own thoughts and analysis. Citations may be formatted in APA, MLA or Chicago style, as long as they are consistent throughout. Research and resources should be incorporated with scholarly application.

Research Essay: To develop the term paper students will first be responsible for

Research Essay: To develop the term paper students will first be responsible for

Research Essay: To develop the term paper students will first be responsible for picking a
commodity that they find interesting (i.e. one of: cotton; blood; lithium; oil; natural gas;
uranium; aluminum; copper; lead; nickel; tin; zinc; gold; silver; platinum; palladium; iron ore;
corn; wheat; bioinformation; soybeans; cocoa; coffee; sugar; tea; bananas; palm oil; peanuts;
shea nuts; potash; cashews; tropical timber; rubber; diamonds; columbite–tantalite [coltan];
opium; cattle; saffron; caviar; jute; data or any other licit, illicit, ‘real’or ‘fictitious’ commodity
approved by the course instructor). The Polity Resources Series is a great place to start to
find ideas about what commodity to select:
https://www.politybooks.com/serieslanding?subject_slug=politics-international-
relations&series_slug=resources. Students will develop a research question on any aspect of the
politics of the commodity to be studied, and will be responsible for conducting the research
needed to answer the question, for presenting it in written form as a research paper, and for
ensuring that the material presented relates directly to the course material. To develop a
comprehensive answer to the research question, the paper should draw extensively upon
concepts and approaches covered in the core texts and in the lectures. In addition to the course
material, it should also draw upon a diverse array of scholarly and non-scholarly sources
available through the library and the Internet. Papers will be no longer than 2000 words in
length, excluding the references, and conform to the Political Science Writing Guide. Criteria
for the grading of the research essay will include: the clarity and strength of the thesis stated at
the beginning of the paper; the organization of the paper around the clear thesis; the extent to
which the discussion engages with the course material; the clarity, editing and style of the
presentation; and the extent to which students acknowledge counter-arguments to their positions
and make substantive efforts to address those counter-arguments. Students should pay
particularly close attention to their citations to ensure consistency and accuracy. This course
requirement will be discussed at length in class on Wednesday 28 February. Turnitin will be in
use on the Dropbox (see below).