I have already started the essay and will upload the part that I have. I need th

I have already started the essay and will upload the part that I have. I need th

I have already started the essay and will upload the part that I have. I need the essay to be reviewed for mistakes and citation corrections (Chicago style citations) I need to add three more sources ( journal articles) and ensure that the methodology section is done properly. The power point needs to be finished as well. I will upload the instructions for you to follow on the assignment and the essay I have already written.

Homework No. 9 20 points Give your paper a title 1,000 words minimum (more words

Homework No. 9 20 points Give your paper a title 1,000 words minimum (more words

Homework No. 9 20 points Give your paper a title 1,000 words minimum (more words are always OK) Write the word count on your paper Minimum 6 organized paragraphs (more paragraphs are fine) Proofread and spellcheck DO NOT GO ON THE INTERNET TO RESEARCH ANY PART OF THIS ASSIGNMENT — NO OUTSIDE SUMMARIES OR INFORMATION WATCH THE FILMS, ONLY, AND RESPOND TO THE HOMEWORK PROMPTS FROM THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE FILMS INFORMATION FROM OUTSIDE OR INTERNET SOURCES WILL RESULT IN A VERY LOW GRADE Organize your paper in this way: Introductory paragraph – in this first paragraph you must include detail on Bettany Hughes. Who is she? Why does she undertake the mission of making these three films? For you, personally, what was the most surprising of all her historical findings? Summarize each film individually, in its own paragraph or paragraphs (more than one paragraph per film is OK) There should be no less than three separate paragraphs, at least one each, detailing the individual film summaries – each paragraph should be titled with the film it is about Each paragraph should have the tittle of the film that you are summarizing DO NOT LUMP ALL THE FILMS TOGETHER INTO ONE PARAGRAPH In a separate paragraph, write your response to the “Psychology Today” article In your final paragraph, write your overall response to the films. What did you learn? What surprised you? Are there things that clash with your own understanding or beliefs? All history –– religious, secular, or otherwise –– is a narrative comprised of selective information. What is included, as well as what is left out, creates the present narrative. In any society, power is structured on the basis of race, class and gender. Across the globe, current ideologies/societies tend to be patriarchal. That is a structure enshrining a power order that looks like this: God (who is male) Man Woman Child Animal Environment However, matriarchal cultures and ideologies still prevail in some parts of the world, and in these societies God is female. The BriBri of Costa Rica, for example, is a matriarchal society. The power structure there looks like this: God (who is female) Woman Man Child Animal Environment If we go back far enough in history, Greek and Roman gods were both male and female. Today, K-12 school classes teach these beliefs of ancient civilizations as ‘mythology.’ This is an elitist point of view and belittles the beliefs of these bygone civilizations. The ancient Greeks and Romans worshipped Zeus, Apollo, Athena, Venus and the rest as authentic and genuine deities who ruled the earth and the heavens. Consider this: if the earth survives for another millennium, K-12 students a thousand or two thousand years from now may be studying in classes where God, Jesus, Jehovah and Allah are, themselves, presented as the subjects of mythology––the stuff and lore and legends, but certainly not real. For this assignment: First, watch the entire ‘Divine Women Series ‘When God Was a Girl’ No. 1- Divine Women: When God Was a Girl: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xzrlkvLinks to an external site. No. 2 – Divine Women: War of the Words: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xzrjcfLinks to an external site. No. 3 – Divine Women: Handmaids of the Gods: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xzs4tjLinks to an external site. Be sure to include commentary from all three films from the people that Bettany Hughes interviews. Whom does she choose to interview – (specifically name these individuals)? Specifically, what do they talk about – what are the various topics of the interviews? Also, read this article from the publication Psychology Today, “Secularism and the Status of Women: Women’s lives are better where secular culture prevails,” which points out that women in secular societies fare far better by several equity indicators than they do in religious societies. Expand on this point and give present day examples. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-secular-life/201411/secularism-and-the-status-womenLinks to an external site. This assignment is a reflection paper. For this paper, you will write: Your responses to the films. There is wide latitude on this assignment. What did you think about what was presented in the films? What are your reactions to historian Bettany Hughes’ modern-day findings of historical artifacts that show female social leaders and female religious leaders? Do her findings clash with what you might have learned in school, or in your place of worship, or from your family, or the wider community/society? If so, how so? In addition to your reflection of the films, you must include commentary on the “Psychology Today” article noted above. Religion is a major component in shaping society. In 2023, we are seeing a big shift in religious beliefs and how people worship –– or do not worship or have any religion at all. According to historians, matriarchy (female rule) once reigned in Europe and Asia. Goddesses were worshipped and this belief shaped society at the time, which leaned toward matriarchy. Women were the social, political and religious leaders. Then came centuries of patriarchy (male rule) centered on the idea of a single male god (God as the ‘Father’) and no goddesses at all. A successful smear campaign against women was launched. Goddesses were stripped of power and significance. It followed that women, who had once been revered for their power and wisdom, were stripped of power and socially downgraded to having little value beyond bearing the next generation. The Catholic church, in particular, declared war on witches, who were the wise women and healers of their time. The tern “witch” means “wise one.” Historians estimate that up to 9 million witches were killed during this genocide, which tends to be omitted from history books. The pushback against this male-centric ideology occurs in present time. We can now see, once again, women leaders in countries all around the world. Significantly, we see women in top levels of education, politics, religion, science, medicine, art, and so forth. In the United States, which clings staunchly to its patriarchal ideology and culture, women are still making some strides toward a return to equity in the division of power. You must include this prediction: With this changing shift in how women are viewed by others and how they view themselves, include in your reflection what you think the social structure of the world might be 50 years from now. What was it like 50 years in the past? Think politically about who gets what, when, how – and why. In what places of power do you predict women will be in 50 years from now? Will they have gone forward, remained the same, or lost political ground?

Research Essay Guidelines: 1) Research Question. A research question has to be c

Research Essay Guidelines: 1) Research Question. A research question has to be c

Research Essay Guidelines: 1) Research Question. A research question has to be clearly articulated and the relevance of the question has to be demonstrated with careful contextualization and significance of the problem under study. 2) Hypothesis: A tentative short statement making a claim with regard to your research findings. A hypothesis can help verify an assumption or debunk an assumption based on research. 3) Analytical Frame: What kind of analytical frame/lens is being deployed to study the problem? How is this analytical approach developed by scholars? What kind of analytical insights can you cultivate by developing this approach to the problem? 4) Debate among scholars: What is the existing debate among scholars and practitioners with regard to the problem that you are exploring? How has this literature helped you to verify the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature. It should not be a simple reproduction of the previous lit review exercises. It should be an effort to articulate how the existing lit has helped you to think about approaching the problem, developing an analytical frame and cultivated an understanding of key concepts. 5) Key Arguments: The paper should state clearly what are the key arguments you are trying to make in your paper. Each argument should be explained clearly at length with the help of examples. Each argument should be articulated in separate paragraphs and these should be organized in a manner demonstrating logical consistency with forward and backward linkages without repetition. The body of the paper should be devoted to identifying and developing each of these arguments clearly in your paper. The arguments should provide coherent contextualization and develop each issue area very carefully and in a logical and systematic manner. This is the most important part of your research paper. 6) Conclusion: A short statement sharing your reflections on the topic of your research and its potential for further exploration. It can also include some policy recommendations based on research. Word Length: 5000 words including bibliography and citations. Use Chicago style citation.

In Figure 15.13, we have two veto players, A and B, who are located in a two-dim

In Figure 15.13, we have two veto players, A and B, who are located in a two-dim

In Figure 15.13, we have two veto players, A and B, who are located in a two-dimensionalissue space. The status quo policy is given by the point SQ.
a. Using Figure 15.13, draw indifference curves for each veto player with respect to the status quo. Shade in the winset if there is one.
b. In your own words, describe what a winset is in the context of veto player theory

In 2015, a massive refugee crisis began in Southeast Asia when the Rohingya peop

In 2015, a massive refugee crisis began in Southeast Asia when the Rohingya
peop

In 2015, a massive refugee crisis began in Southeast Asia when the Rohingya
people began fleeing Myanmar. Do you believe that Myanmar committed genocide?
Do some independent research on this crisis and justify your answer.
• Your answer should discuss relevant treaty law and customary international
law.
• Your answer should define genocide and provide background information
on the Myanmar conflict in Rakhine State.

I have a rough draft on a paper about digital nomadism in Indonesia. My professo

I have a rough draft on a paper about digital nomadism in Indonesia. My professo

I have a rough draft on a paper about digital nomadism in Indonesia. My professors gave me those feedbacks so the paper has to shift to another direction:
The indonesian government think it’s a good idea to develop its economy but is it really? Governments like that are bad at creating new economic environment, especially that are sustainable and preserve the culture. So we have to significantly change the paper and put the emphasis on this. It’s really important to highlight that the government is promoting this digital nomad visa etc… The discussion should address this labor migration paradox which is: Governments of the south (underdeveloped countries) are more than willing to welcome labor migration from the north but governments from the north are opposed to welcome labor migration from the south (something that should really be mentioned in the conclusion/reflection on all the research). It really shows a double standard issue.It’s still important to talk about what digital nomadism etc… But instead of focusing just on canggu and the social economic impacts it could have (considering that it is not just digital nomadism but probably mainly tourism) , focusing on how the Indonesian government promotes that, what it means, and obviously mentioning the possible impacts. So the focus has to shift on LABOR MIGRATION. This obviously needs more sources, the paper I attached has already some good sources/informations, it’s still really important to explain what digital nomadism is etc… But the paper needs to be SIGNIFICANTLY changed to focus on the labor migration issue.

Please follow the directions in files below and the rubric! Take your time it’s

Please follow the directions in files below and the rubric! Take your time it’s

Please follow the directions in files below and the rubric! Take your time it’s due on the 11th of December. The article is sent please cite and look through the directions carefully.

Marx argues that the rise of class solidarity removes the risk from investing si

Marx argues that the rise of class solidarity removes the risk from investing si

Marx argues that the rise of class solidarity removes the risk from investing significant power in a centralized state; because the bureaucrats and the workers belong to the same party and class, they share interests. Both Kropotkin and Hayek, in different ways, argue against the administrative state. Should the state be invested with greater power in Western governments? Should state power be pulled back? Or are we at the correct balance? Why?
Answer in 1500-2000 words.
LINKS TO TEXTS TO CITE AND BASE ARGUMENTS:
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/1…
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/c…
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/kropotk…
https://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2012/05/the-1956-pr…