Your research should cover two parts: An overview of the country’s profile, incl

Your research should cover two parts: An overview of the country’s profile, incl

Your research should cover two parts: An overview of the country’s profile, including issues of people and society, environment, government, economy, etc. For example, you can include aspects of its population such as ethnic composition, religion, language, and its economy, such as main industry. You don’t have to include everything! You can select certain aspects that you believe are interesting or unique to the country. A description of two main issues (your choice) the country is currently facing. These issues can vary from terrorism, financial crisis, human rights violations, election, etc. The assignment should be at least 4 pages long (standard margin, 12 font size, Times New Roman, double-spaced), and should include a reference section that lists all work that has been cited or consulted while conducting research. The reference list page does not include in the minimum 4 pages criteria. For the country profile section, the main source should be the CIA factbook: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/ The writing needs to be your own, meaning that you cannot copy and paste directly from the source. You will have to paraphrase/rewrite in your own words to avoid plagiarism. For the current issue section, additional sources should be utilized but will have to be considered fact-based and analytical. Sources from various international think tank institutions, such as Council on Foreign Relations (https://www.cfr.org), The Heritage Foundation (https://www.heritage.org), Center for Strategic & International Studies (https://www.csis.org), Brookings Institution (https://www.brookings.edu/) are excellent sources of expert policy analyses and reports. In addition, you can read various reports and analysis from official IGO and NGO websites, such as the United Nations, Human Rights Watch, Greenpeace, etc. Citation style: Citation should follow APA or MLA or Chicago style. You can easily find basic citation style guides on the web. Please be aware that without properly citing the source, and therefore not giving credit to the original author, your work will be considered plagiarized. A separate page of “work cited” or “reference list” should be included. This assignment counts 50 points towards your final grade. Below are the grading rubrics: The case study discusses all required aspects of the country (profile and issues): 30 points; missing one or more parts will result in point deduction(s). The case study meets the required format (minimum pages, font size, etc.): 10 points; points may be deducted if one or more formatting requirements are not met. All sources are academic and scholarly (using sources from examples listed above): 10 points; points may be deducted if one or more sources do not meet the criteria.

here is my research proposal: “1) Descriiption/Justification for Your Topic: The

here is my research proposal: “1) Descriiption/Justification for Your Topic:
The

here is my research proposal: “1) Descriiption/Justification for Your Topic:
The current state of politics marked by divisions poses a significant challenge to the democratic foundation of our nation. This issue is incredibly important as the United States, once seen as a shining example of democracy, now faces struggles that question its existence. The echoes of challenges like the Civil War serve as reminders of the seriousness of this situation. It is urgent that we understand the factors driving this polarization in order to safeguard our democracy. This research holds significance for policymakers, scholars, and citizens alike as it aims to unravel the complexities that have led to the state of American politics.
2) The Literature Review:
By drawing from a range of sources, this literature review will primarily focus on peer-reviewed articles and books to develop a comprehensive understanding of the vast body of knowledge surrounding political polarization. Five key sources will be analyzed, examining both shared viewpoints among authors and areas where disagreements exist. By categorizing these authors based on perspectives and identifying gaps in existing research, we can contribute a perspective on understanding political polarization.
Selected Literature:
Fiorina, M. P. (2005). “Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America.”
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). “How Democracies Die.”
Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). “Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics.”
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). “#Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media.”
Putnam, R. D. (2000). “Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.”
3) Writing a Research Question:
Research Question: What are the underlying causes and consequences of the deep political polarization in contemporary America, and how have historical events and party transformations contributed to this phenomenon?
4) Thesis Statement:
In exploring the roots of political polarization, this research contends that historical events, party transformations, and societal changes have converged to create a divisive political landscape. The consequences of this polarization are far-reaching, impacting democratic norms, civic engagement, and the overall stability of American democracy.
5) Preview Your Argument, Methods, and Evidence:
Argument: The research will argue that the polarization of American politics is a multifaceted phenomenon influenced by historical events, party transformations, and societal shifts.
Methods: A mixed-method analysis will be employed, combining qualitative approaches such as historical research and content analysis with quantitative methods involving statistical analysis of voter behavior and party ideologies.
Evidence: Primary sources, historical documents, party platforms, and statistical data will be used to support the argument, providing a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of political polarization.
6) Present a Working Bibliography:
Fiorina, M. P. (2005). “Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America.”
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). “How Democracies Die.”
Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). “Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics.”
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). “#Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media.”
Putnam, R. D. (2000). “Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.”
This research proposal aims to contribute a nuanced understanding of political polarization, shedding light on its origins, consequences, and implications for the future of American democracy. Through a meticulous examination of scholarly literature and a mixed-method analysis, this study seeks to uncover the complexities that have led to the current state of political division in the United States.”
here is professor’s comment on the proposal: ”
This looks very promising. I’m encouraged that you have taken the appropriate cues from the polarization modules. That said, there are a few issues I’ll draw to your attention.
You need to be more expansive and more transparent on what your methods will be. Your methods should guide and inform your study–so it’s crucial that you specify in greater depth how your project will proceed.
You need to be more specific on what aspect of political polarization you are examining. This is a broad term that needs to be defined and delineated. This will also help you limit the scope of inquiry.
Need to go further and deeper on your proposed argument. It’s quite alluring and promising–but it’s too spare–even for a proposal.
Overall, this is a very good proposal. As with your prior work, it’s thoughtful, reflective, and well-written.”
here is the writing guide: “Here’s a writing guide that I’ve developed over the years that should help you plan and implement a successful project. Keep in touch and good luck!
Referring to this guide will help you plan and execute a successful research project. For stylistic issues (footnoting, bibliography, etc.) please refer to any of the major college-writing guides. The bookstore has several writing guides available for purchase.
The Before Writing Stages
Start Early. A research paper is an evolutionary process. In order for you to have sufficient time to reflect upon the question(s) at hand, you must allow yourself ample time to filter the material through your own cognitive lens. If you don’t give yourself enough time, you will not be able to ponder and revise your original thoughts and hypotheses. Moreover, trained readers can smell an insufficiently prepared paper at seventy paces! In short, give yourself plenty of time and start early. Rule #1 about preparing a research paper: They always take more time than you originally anticipate.
Break down the component tasks of the assignment AKA how to AFOS (Avoid Feeling Overwhelmed Syndrome). AFOS strikes all students at some time in their career. AFOS can be a debilitating condition–but it can be overcome. To avoid AFOS make a plan (this is not an outline) of attack that breaks down the various tasks of the assignment (collecting the materials; making an outline, revising and polishing stages, etc.). By apportioning the entire assignment into easily digestible tasks and components you should be able to avoid AFOS. One final point about AFOS: it is always better to apportion your time on the entire process into many small to medium time periods rather than setting aside several ”mega” sessions. This way not only do you feel that you are making incremental progress, but also you will be able to revise your original ideas better.
Hunting and Gathering Stage. Before writing your first outline, make sure that you have conducted a sufficient amount of research. I know “sufficient” is a nebulous term, but you need to be sure that you have canvassed a wide swath of opinion, facts and information. Don’t worry that after conducting your research your original ideas about the topic at hand change. In fact this is a sign of intellectual growth and maturity. At this stage, you are ready to begin pondering the writing stages of the assignment.
The Writing Stages
AFOS Revisited. AFOS is particularly dangerous at this stage. Don’t succumb to its degenerative lure!. Like in the prewriting stages, break down the component aspects of the assignment into: introduction; thesis; body of the paper; conclusion, etc. Remember this is a conceptual device that makes the process more manageable–but do not forget that all aspects of the entire final draft be fully linked in a logically consistent manner.
The Outline. At this stage construct an outline. Where are you are going in this paper, why are you taking this approach, what materials are you using, how are they linked, are some of the questions that you must address in an outline. An outline is a perennially changing document of intent. You will probably make numerous revised editions of the outline–which is entirely appropriate. An outline serves as an in-progress road map for the writer. It does not have to make sense to anyone but you–remember that the outline is your own document. Moreover, the outline is a tool that guides the evolution of the writing craft. Keep your latest outline close by, whenever you feel that you have reached the writing stages.
The Introduction. Most students slight this aspect. They shouldn’t, as an introduction lays out the where, why, and how questions that you will be addressing throughout the paper. An introduction should be far more than just a regurgitation of the main questions that you have been assigned. In essence, a fully developed introduction acts as a formalized conceptual road map for the reader, much as the outline serves as your own conceptual road map. Personally, I write my introductions last. That way, I know the flow and development of the final product. Be sure to link the introduction, with your thesis, and the conclusions. This is conducted in what I call the polishing stages (see below).
The Thesis Statement. Let’s define what a thesis is. A thesis is a theoretically consistent set of linked propositions that underpin the entire body of your paper. In short, the thesis is the conceptual locomotive of the paper. The thesis statement shapes and molds everything that is to follow. Note that it should appear no later than page 2 of your paper.
The Body of the Paper. This is where you make sure that you address all aspects of the research assignment. This is typically, the least problematic area in the writing division of labor. But be careful to fully develop all relevant facts and interpretations here.
Conclusions. Your conclusions should not come as a surprise to the reader. The conclusions are the final opportunity to forcefully press home your conceptual and theoretical points that you have prior introduced and developed. Don’t be timid here–at the same time don’t go overboard. Think of your conclusions as a final summation of the entire assignment. Make sure that you have fully addressed the questions you set you would in the introduction and in the thesis. Finally, make sure that the introduction, thesis, body, and conclusions all dovetail one another–the paper at this point should no longer appear as a project of loosely connected parts–it should be an entirely seamless product.
The Polishing Stage. After you are convinced that have finished the above, take a day off. That’s right, take a day off. Then pick up the then final draft and begin to address the grammar and presentation issues of your work with a fine tooth comb (obviously you have not ignored these aspects up to now, but its now time to polish and shine the final product). Make sure that what you have constructed is forceful, clear, and concise. Don’t use jargon, or “big” words that you don’t normally use. Make sure that there are no spelling errors, no instances of poor grammar, etc. I believe that there is no separation between what are deemed issues of “style” as opposed to “substance.” Step aside from your paper for a while (at least half a day) for hopefully the final time (at least for this assignment). Now read your paper aloud, or better yet, get someone to read it aloud for you, while you are present. Any final problems? No? Then hand in your completed paper.”

This paper aims to Address the association between homelessness and incarceratio

This paper aims to Address the association between homelessness and incarceratio

This paper aims to Address the association between homelessness and incarceration, with hope to understand: known metrics determining the effectiveness of programs and services? Lasting affects to mental and emotional health after being incarcerated? Are homeless people unfairly criminalized and unprotected by City/State level practices and policies? How does race and gender-based inequalities contribute to high rates of homelessness? Please include range of determinants that perpetuate overrepresentation within the homeless communities, such as mental illness, untreated substance uses and oppressed minority groups that directly correlate to their chance at quality of life; resulting in poverty, unemployment, poor healthcare and eventually homeless. – Introduction (COMPLETED- please let me know if I need to upload this for your review for consistency) – Analytical Framework 4-5 pages – Methodology 4-5 pages o Statement of hypothesis/ Research questions o Research approach, Research design, Strategy and data (charts) – Finding 2-3 pages – Conclusions 3 pages o Include recommendations o summary of analytical framework – executive Summary 1 page o overview of project and report

No plagiarism for anything Your essay will be between 5 and 6 pages not includin

No plagiarism for anything Your essay will be between 5 and 6 pages not includin

No plagiarism for anything Your essay will be between 5 and 6 pages not including a cover sheet and reference page in APA format. (APA format guides are in the ‘file’ section of Canvas for assistance.) Students will select one European nation to discuss how the war between Russia and Ukraine effects the nature of politics in the nation selected. Has the war affected a recent or current (ongoing) election and elected officials? What positions on the war have a direct political effect on the outcome of the nation you selected and how leaders are (being) selected? Building on your previous knowledge and essay, has the war had a direct effect on the nation’s involvement in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and military/political dimensions of funding the war or trade restrictions on either side? To what extent has the European Union (EU) and the policies and political issues of the nation played a part in the economic stability of the nation? What casualties of war effect the inter-relationship of nations within the European Continent such as human rights, the environment, economic stability, humanitarian aide and ethnic nation building? Guide: Clearly identify the European nation you selected and present a clear hypothesis for your essay.

For this project, you will need to select a particular policy issue to explore.

For this project, you will need to select a particular policy issue to explore.

For this project, you will need to select a particular policy issue to explore. The United States is made up of a variety of diverse communities and cultures. Societal and political issues affect these groups differently which needs to be addressed by our legislature. In this assignment, you will choose a current political issue that impacts communities in the United States.
Current Event Article: Students need to pick a current issue facing communities in the United States that needs to be addressed by our national government. Students must provide a working link to your article in the document that you upload to Canvas. Just copy/paste the link to the top of your document. If the link does not work, you will not receive any points for your article, so please double-check it! Your news article must
be relevant to the national politics in the U.S.
be current, so it should be dated sometime within the LAST SIX (6) MONTHS
be from a newspaper, magazine, or another reputable news outlet (i.e. New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Dallas Morning News)
Communities could be many different things (i.e. racial, economic, religious, regional)
Analysis: Students need to explore the interest group space around the current event policy you’ve chosen. This may be done as a simple essay, or you are welcome to format it as a letter to an elected representative. If you format it as a letter, address it to your correct US Representative or US Senator. Students must put their CWID number on the assignment in addition to your name.
Define, in-depth, an issue within a particular community or culture to explain (to your member of Congress, if writing it as a letter). (Note: A community or culture is defined as any group of people with similar backgrounds and interests) (Understanding Communities and Cultures, Recognizing Principles)
Compare and contrast how your selected issue affects two different communities and/or cultures (i.e., low-income v. high-income, rural v. urban communities, or younger generations v. older generations). (Understanding Communities and Cultures, Recognizing principles)
Describe how social elements (i.e., history, religious beliefs, politics, communication style, economics, etc.) affect the position of the communities and/or cultures that you’re examining. (Social Principles)
Explain how action on this issue taken by the member of Congress you are writing to can positively or negatively impact a particular community and/or culture. (Social Engagement)
There is no minimum or maximum page or word requirement. You will need to assess whether you’ve adequately covered the material sufficiently to prove you have a good understanding of it, and research into your different interest groups enough to make a strong case for each community’s interests. I suspect that a good discussion will take a couple of pages of actual text and explanation, at least. Works Cited — to the extent that you use outside info (and you absolutely will need to!), do provide a citation list. That can be attached as a works cited page, or incorporated as footnotes/endnotes. Citation format is your choice, use what you are most comfortable with.

Assignment: Explain why federal Justices, who are not popularly elected, have su

Assignment:
Explain why federal Justices, who are not popularly elected, have su

Assignment:
Explain why federal Justices, who are not popularly elected, have such wide authority to strike down popular laws; why do judges have such enormous power with so little public accountability? Please use the term Judicial Review in your response. Why does the U.S. have such an undemocratic institution in its democracy?
Drawing on Saffell, Meese, and Brennan in ch. 13 of your American Government: Examined Reader, do you think Justices should act according to the dictums of judicial activism or judicial restraint? You will want to include direct references to Meese and Brennan in your response.
Using what you have learned in parts one and two, pretend you are a Supreme Court Justice who must render a decision in Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP. On what are you basing your decision? Which parts of the Constitution or other documents are relevant? Remember you are acting as a justice, not simply expressing your personal opinions.
Reply, thoughtfully, to at least two of your classmates.
Resources:
Open to Debate e-text and the corresponding power point lecture outlines and lectures or video lecture clips
American Government: Examined reader, Chapter 13
Saffell, “The Proper Role for the Supreme Court: Activist or Restraint?
Meese, “Jurisprudence of Original Intention”
Brennan, “A Jurisprudence of Human Dignity”
Online Resources:
http://www.supremecourt.govLinks to an external site.
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-06-24/supreme-court-2020-term-major-casesLinks to an external site.
other online resources of your choice, as needed
Tips for Success:
– I will be looking for direct references to assigned readings (author and page # citations are adequate). Please limit yourself to the assigned materials.
– More thoughtful analyses utilizing critical thought will earn higher scores.
Grading Rubric:
Part 1.
6 points
Part 2.
6 points
Part 3.
4 points
Writing Mechanics:
2 points
Response to Classmates
2 points
Total possible:
20 points

20 points Give your paper a title 1,000 words minimum (more words are always OK)

20 points Give your paper a title 1,000 words minimum (more words are always OK)

20 points Give your paper a title 1,000 words minimum (more words are always OK) Write the word count on your paper Minimum 6 organized paragraphs (more paragraphs are fine) Proofread and spellcheck

Country Analysis on France: Policies addressing cybersecurity and digital sovere

Country Analysis on France: Policies addressing cybersecurity and digital sovere

Country Analysis on France: Policies addressing cybersecurity and digital sovereignty. Contributions to European and international cybersecurity efforts. : write A paper (3500-5000 words) in Chicago style that analyzes the history of one country’s experience of cyber policy. Especially highlighting how domestic, regional, and global forces shaped their policy and doctrinal approach. How a nation-state’s strategy for the use of cyberpower is heavily reflected in its approach to its general culture of national security embodied by more traditional forms of state power. Thinking through the questions below should help you better contextualize your country’s approach to cyber policy and will likely offer some new insights that you may not have considered. 1) How does the nation interpret threats? What is their perception of how to balance internal vs external threats? 2) How does the nation use force? What are the thresholds it considers? 3) How does the nation exert influence? Domestically, regionally, globally? 4) How does it spur innovation (e.g. does it favor entrepreneurship, does it think market forces need little help and will self-regulate, does it attempt to plan its economy) 5) How does it delineate the national good? Esp how does it attempt to balance individual rights with state interests?

1) Given the various aspects impacting the issue of immigration in the United St

1) Given the various aspects impacting the issue of immigration in the United St

1) Given the various aspects impacting the issue of immigration in the United States, who deserves the majority of the blame for what is now considered an “immigration problem?” Is it the U.S. government for failing to secure the southern border and properly enforce laws like the IRCA and the IIRIRA? Is it the employers who are in many instances, knowingly hiring unauthorized workers and exploiting their labor at a profit? Or is it the immigrant workers who circumvent the naturalization process, obtain falsified documents and accept low paying jobs? What information are you relying upon to support your position?
(2) Do you believe lawmakers truly want to “fix” our immigration policies? Is the country even capable of maintaining the current state of functionality if all unauthorized workers were deported? Why or Why not?

For this assignment, we are going to revisit the real case of Johnson v. Poway,

For this assignment, we are going to revisit the real case of Johnson v. Poway,

For this assignment, we are going to revisit the real case of Johnson v. Poway, a civil suit that was argued in 2010. The issue centers on teacher-generated displays in the classroom setting. The facts are these: in 2007 the Poway School District ordered math teacher Bradley Johnson to remove his classroom displays, claiming that they were inappropriate. The banners at issue had been on his classroom walls for more than 20 years. Johnson argued that they were not inappropriate for the classroom and filed suit against the Poway School District, seeking relief. Bradley will win the first round of litigation, but then lose on appeal. You are going to be a lawyer in the revisiting of this scenario. You will be the lawyer for the Poway School District (banners come down and stay down) OR, you will be the lawyer for Bradley Johnson (banners go back up and stay up). Your choice. Under your title, you must write which side you are representing in court. Are you the lawyer for Bradley or the lawyer for Poway?