Multiple choice help on political science quiz about world wide events and Canad

Multiple choice help on political science quiz about world wide events and Canad

Multiple choice help on political science quiz about world wide events and Canadas relation to them
topics include terrorism, nato, economy and foreign investments and maquiladoras and free trade, global pop, NORAD/ the arctic sovereignty and climate change

“ChatGPT v Me”: Article Summary and Critical Response With the recent advent of

“ChatGPT v Me”: Article Summary and Critical Response
With the recent advent of

“ChatGPT v Me”: Article Summary and Critical Response
With the recent advent of ChatGPT and other AI text generators, academia is faced with a dilemma: do we resist or adapt? In this assignment, we choose to adapt. By choosing to adapt, this assignment raises awareness of the importance of knowing and using technology for ethical purposes in academia and will better prepare students to the challenges they will face in a world evermore reliant on AI.
Outside of interacting with and critiquing ChatGPT, students will also summarize, accurately paraphrase, and critically respond to academic author(s). Summary is a concise presentation of the main points or ideas of a text. Paraphrasing is presenting the words and ideas of others “in your own words,” particularly in a succinct way. Critical response is a succinct reaction to an article that includes your own perspective, analysis, or critique of the argument forwarded by the author(s).
Students will select an academic, peer-reviewed article and do all three of the above, without plagiarizing.
Student will then ask ChatGPT to “critically respond to” that same article. They will then critique ChatGPT’s output by comparison.
35% of the final grade.
The “ChatGPT v Me” assignment should be 1,000 words (max)
There are six components to completing this assignment:
1. Finding an article:
Students will search, choose, and retrieve one peer-reviewed. The article must be published within the last decade and the subject matter must relate to course material (i.e., general topic is on/about a main institution). Ensure the article has an abstract, introduction, methodology section, and a discussion and/or conclusion.
2. Reading (and rereading) the article:
You should identify the following components:
The research question and/or purpose of the study (usually in the introduction)
The hypothesis/hypotheses or expectations (may be in the introduction, literature review, or methods section)
What data and method/approach were used to carry out the study (often in data/methods)
The results (usually in the findings)
The interpretation or implication of the findings (often in the discussion or conclusion)
Please note that not all articles follow this precise format, but the above components provide a good guide. Regardless, recall that a suitable article should have the following components: an abstract, introduction, methodology section, and a discussion and/or conclusion. As you read, highlight key sentences or write out the key points (e.g., hypothesis, research question, data, etc.) for each paragraph. Do not attempt to complete this assignment by merely reading the abstract or article once.
After identifying and noting the key points, ask yourself the following questions:
How does this study address the questions that were posed?
What is the main contribution of the study?
How convincing are the results? Are any results particularly surprising?
What are the limitations?
How could the author(s) alter their data, methods, approach, or analysis to strengthen their argument?
3. Summary and paraphrase
As indicated above, one of the main goals of this assignment is to communicate, in a concise manner, the main points of the article: the research questions and/or hypotheses, the data and methods the author(s) used to answer or test them, the results they arrived at, and the overall significance of the study. The summary/paraphrase section should not include any personal opinion or critique—and it must be in your own words. Do not include any direct quotes in your assignment! In an assignment of this size and with this purpose, it is imperative that you paraphrase the author—that is, putting their ideas in your own words.
Suggested length: 500 words (divided into more than one paragraph)
4. Critical response
Having summarized and paraphrased the article, the next step is to critically respond to it. Your critical response can take several different directions but might include: a short discussion of the persuasiveness of the argument, the limitations of the argument, and/or aspects where the author(s) could have improved the article or done something differently.
Suggested length: 250 words (one to two paragraphs)
5. Asking ChatGPT for “critical response”
First, students will copy and paste the abstract, introduction, methodology, and discussion and/or conclusion of their article into a word document. 1 Students will then access ChatGPT following this link: https://chat.openai.com/auth/login. Once they have gained access to the free version of ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), they will type “Critically respond to this text: “[the abstract, introduction, methodology, and discussion and/or conclusion portions of the article]” 2 into the “Send a message” text box. They will then copy the output that ChatGPT provides and attach it as an appendix at the end of the assignment.
6. Critiquing ChatGPT
Students will then critique ChatGPT’s output by comparison. In other words, how does ChatGPT’s summary and critical response compare to your own? The critique can take a few different formats but should include: a short discussion of where ChatGPT was successful and where it was lacking (the merits and limitations of ChatGPT) and a commentary on the risks and concerns for ChatGPT in academia.
Suggested length: 250 words (one to two paragraphs)
In total, the complete assignment should be 1,000 words (max) The purpose of this assignment is to practice concision. You will be penalized if you exceed this length.
The last page of your assignment should be an appendix of ChatGPT’s output.
Four distinct components of the responses will be assessed:
Summary and paraphrasing
Critical response
Critique of ChatGPT
Writing and presentation
Each of these is taken into consideration in assigning the grade.
1. Summary and paraphrasing
Includes a thesis statement, which briefly states the main goal of the article that was selected.
Provides a brief summary of the article, highlighting: the research question/hypotheses, data and methods, findings, and significance of the article.
References to the article are in the students’ own words and paraphrases are appropriately signaled and cited.
Appropriate level of detail is provided (neither too little nor too much)
2. Critical response
Provides a critical response to the article, discussing the article’s: strengths and/or weaknesses, persuasiveness, and limitations.
Assessment of the article is factually correct.
Appropriate level of detail is provided.
3. Critique of ChatGPT
Provides a discussion of the merits and limitations of ChatGPT in comparison to their own summary and critical response.
Includes a commentary on the risks and concerns for ChatGPT in academia.
4. Writing and presentation
Writing is clear and grammatically correct; there is a clear indication that the paper has been proofread.
Paper is logically and effectively organized.
Paper includes reference to the selected article and in-text citations, using CJPS, are included where appropriate.
Paper does not include any direct quotes.
Formatting follows the correct guidelines, including font size (see style guidelines) and length (1,000 words maximum)
The ChatGPT output is attached as an appendix.

Will include prompts and instructions in a word document. Please aim for a 5. A

Will include prompts and instructions in a word document. Please aim for a 5. A

Will include prompts and instructions in a word document. Please aim for a 5. A strong paper would choose depth over breadth. Also, state you argument right in the beginning and please do not leave the reader wondering what you are arguing. Also, don’t use a lot of summary. Work to more deeply engage with the other readings you pull in.

Instructions Taking the same topic as identified in the Letter to the Editor, ex

Instructions
Taking the same topic as identified in the Letter to the Editor, ex

Instructions
Taking the same topic as identified in the Letter to the Editor, explore the topic more fully (2,250-2,500 words) with several required sections:
A one-page statement of the problem
Background information on the issue, including the primary actors involved
Identification of at least three potential solutions to the problem
Your recommended solution to the problem (this could be a combination of recommended solutions or a different solution from the three identified in #3
The reason why you are recommending your solution
Format
The required sections are presented in sentence/paragraph format without demarcations for sections. Please use 12-point Times New Roman, 1-inch margins, double-spaced, and with APA Citation for both in-text citations and the reference list.
Part of the requirements for this assignment is to provide evidentiary support for the problem (including background information) and the potential solutions. The grading rubric, found in a subsequent section, demands using at least five credible sources in the issue brief. Three of those five minimum credible sources must be from peer-reviewed academic journals. The remaining two credible sources must be from governmental reports. Feel free to supplement those five sources with additional sources, such as newspaper articles (Supplementing with newspaper articles will most likely be necessary).
As this is a W or writing course, a significant portion (25%) of your grade on this assignment will be based on writing quality. Therefore, please remember to take time to proof your assignment.
Please choose the problem based on following direction don’t need letter to editor just topic.
The newspaper selection should depend on the area of interest for the issue at hand. For example, if the letter’s subject is a local issue, such as the water quality in Flint, Michigan, the newspaper for the letter to the editor should be a local one in Flint, Michigan, such as the Flint Courier News. If the subject of the letter to the editor is a state issue, such as the current proposed legislation
Links to an external site.
to change higher education policy in Ohio, the student would want to select a significant local newspaper within the state of interest. For example, in Ohio, outlets like Akron Beacon Journal, The Plain Dealer, The Columbus Dispatch, The Cincinnati Enquirer, Dayton Daily News, and other prominent newspapers in Ohio would be appropriate choices. Finally, if the issue of a nationwide scale, such as the federal government’s response to a crisis, such as the federal government’s response to the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio
Links to an external site.
the student would want to select a newspaper with a nationwide readership. Examples of those types of newspapers include The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Chicago Tribune. These newspaper lists are not exhaustive, and please feel free to reach out to Dr. Larson if you need clarification.

QUESTION: What steps/actions should be taken to address the potential for nuclea

QUESTION: What steps/actions should be taken to address the potential for nuclea

QUESTION: What steps/actions should be taken to address the potential for nuclear proliferation in the future?
INSTRUCTIONS:
– Structure:
o Answer the question in a 4-5 page essay (double-spaced, Times New Roman 12-point font, standard margins).
o Your essay will be evaluated according to the extent that you write a direct and focused response to the question that draws on BOTH lecture notes and course readings.
o While you do not need to directly cite specific readings, you are encouraged to ground your answer in references to them.
– Content:
o Your response must proceed from a specific set of assumptions regarding the following questions:
 (a) Motives: Why do states pursue nuclear weapons?
 (b) Effects: How does the spread of nuclear weapons stand to affect regional and international stability?
o THESIS: You must advance a thesis that answers the question based on one of schools of thought regarding motives and effects.
 (a) Motives: national security, domestic politics, or leader psychology.
 (b) Effects: either proliferation optimism or proliferation pessimism.
o ARGUMENT: you must substantiate your thesis by explaining why your chosen schools of thought on MOTIVES and EFFECTS has greater merit than the others (i.e., demonstrate the relative strength of your chosen school by comparing and contrasting it to the interpretation of events based on the other schools).

Topic: Analyze liberal and conservative ideologies. Which is more persuasive and

Topic: Analyze liberal and conservative ideologies. Which is more persuasive and

Topic: Analyze liberal and conservative ideologies. Which is more persuasive and why?
Reference: jonathan haidt the moral roots of liberals and conservatives
Works cited not required

Prepare and submit your “presidential report.” In this report, you will apply yo

Prepare and submit your “presidential report.” In this report, you will apply yo

Prepare and submit your “presidential report.” In this report, you will apply your knowledge and learning from our course to offer an analysis/recommendation to the US president. To prepare your report, you will assume the position of an outside consultant asked to provide an analysis of and recommendations for the president’s management of US foreign policymaking. Your report must be designed to help the president organize for and engage in policymaking in the most effective manner. This will require you to apply your expertise on the essentials of successful foreign policy management/leadership by the president to offer your recommendations. To fulfill your responsibilities, you will submit your analysis and recommendations for effective foreign policymaking as a 8-10 page (Not incldicng the sources at the bottom) memo to the president.
Your Presidential Report must focus on Presidential style: analyze the presidential style of the current president and offer six recommendations on how best to organize and engage in decision-making in light of that style.
I attached my rough draft below to give you an idea of what you are doing for this. Which is basically adding at least three sources and extending the paper. I also attached the feedback notes as well to help fix whatever you might need for more steps. Please let me know if you need anything, and thank you!

Public opinion is increasing critical of party politics, claiming that parties a

Public opinion is increasing critical of party politics, claiming that parties a

Public opinion is increasing critical of party politics, claiming that parties are unaccountable for the statements they made in electoral campaigns and pledges once they enter office. Are these critical assessments based on reality? Your answer to this question should consider both the changing role of citizens and partisanship to political parties AND explain the role of ideology in party behaviour.

Should the government possessed the power to incarcerate citizens based on their

Should the government possessed the power to incarcerate citizens based on their

Should the government possessed the power to incarcerate citizens based on their
race?
students will receive up to 40 points for answering the journal questions included in the syllabus. Each question is worth 4 points. Students will be evaluated on the following: 1) ability to articulate a clear thesis; 2) textual evidence/discussion of relevant passage (properly cited-including page numbers); and 3) clarity of argument. Each journal question corresponds to the readings of the week. You will be graded on your ability to discuss the relevant assigned readings and answering the question that I asked. While this is an opportunity for students to write without time constraints, journal entries will be evaluated on the basis of their ability to discuss assigned readings from my course. Students who do not discuss the assigned readings will not receive appropriate credit. IF STUDENTS DO NOT ANSWER MY QUESTIONS OR USE THE RELEVANT TEXTS FOR EACH JOURNAL, STUDENTS WILL NOT RECEIVE CREDIT FOR THE JOURNAL ANSWER.
references: • Clinton Rossiter, Constitutional Dictatorship (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2004). chapter XVII and XVIII
plz use the chapters and the files below, NO OUTSIDE SOURCES plz.