Please answer the question in the most detailed manner possible. You should spen
Please answer the question in the most detailed manner possible. You should spend at least two or three paragraphs answering the question to answer effectively. Specifics and details are essential.
What was the central holding in the Supreme Court’s landmark decision Kelo v New London.
Required My paper is about the topic I presented in November. I wanted to write
Required My paper is about the topic I presented in November. I wanted to write about human rights, and I thought that was great. My recommendation is to focus on two countries with different political systems to see how human rights are practiced under different political systems.
I want you to think and discuss! Term Paper The purpose of the Term Paper is to provide political science students or first-time political science majors with the opportunity to research and write about a topic they find fascinating! Furthermore, this is an opportunity for students to learn how to identify a research topic, develop a research question, and conduct research on their chosen topic. In this process, students will learn to think for themselves, approach a policy-relevant question or puzzle, and present their findings in written form. The paper will consist of 5-6 double-spaced pages (not including cover, title page, abstract and bibliography)
Policy: The Federal Land Management and Policy Act of 1976
Policy Making Proces
Policy: The Federal Land Management and Policy Act of 1976
Policy Making Process Steps:
1. Agenda Setting –
2. Policy Formulation
3. Decision Making
4. Implementation
5. Evaluation
You will submit a paper that describes a position on an issue and the rationale for that position. POSITION: THE FEDERAL LAND MANAGEMENT AND POLICY ACT OF 1976 WAS BENEFICIAL. It is based on facts that provide a solid foundation for your argument. All sources must be appropriately cited using APA citations and references. In the position paper you will:
Trace the issue through the five stages of the policy making process.
Use evidence from the assigned readings and from outside sources to support your position on the issue.
Examine the strengths and weaknesses of your position.
Evaluate possible solutions and suggest courses of action. In this section, you will recommend retaining, changing, or discontinuing a particular policy and provide evidence to support your recommendation.
Position papers will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Strength of argument
Use of evidence from the assigned readings for the semester and from outside evidence that support the argument
Your analytic ability and the overall quality of your writing, including grammar, style, organization, and clarity
I want you to follow the rubrics, It is a continuation of the initial project. T
I want you to follow the rubrics, It is a continuation of the initial project. This is the presentation in the form of a slide. 10-15 slides PowerPoint. (exclude the introduction and references page). APA. Please do not copy and paste.
Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, respond to one of the following
Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, respond to one of the following options, and label the beginning of your post indicating either Option 1 or Option 2:
Option 1: The Equal Rights Amendment was first proposed almost a century ago and has still not been added to the United States Constitution. It is supposed to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of sex. It was first introduced to Congress by Alice Paul, leader of women’s suffrage movement in 1923. Compare/contrast the Equal Rights Amendment with the Fourteenth Amendment. Did they deal with separate concepts? Explain your answer.
Option 2: The Bill of Rights is not only included with the United States Constitution but also state constitutions. All states have provisions in their constitutions that protect individual rights. Go online and look up your state constitution concerning amendments that are included in the Bill of Rights. How does your state constitution protect your individual rights?
Be sure to make connections between your ideas and conclusions and the research, concepts, terms, and theory we are discussing this week.
Follow-Up Post Instructions
• You may choose either Option 1 or 2 for your Follow-Up post.
• Respond to at least one peer.
• Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.
• Include a minimum of 1 scholarly source meaningfully to demonstrate much depth. A scholarly source can include your textbook, assigned readings, or additional scholarly research.
Writing Requirements
Minimum of 2 posts (1 initial & 1 follow-up)
Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source) for your Initial Post, and 1 scholarly source for your Follow-Up Post.
APA format for in-text citations and list of references
textbook link
https://ambassadored.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9780135246849/pageid/0
The assignment is focused around answering 2 essay questions out 4 provided so y
The assignment is focused around answering 2 essay questions out 4 provided so your choice as to which. And 3 short Identification questions out of 6 provided so again your choice. The 2 essay questions should be 2 pages each( so four pages total) and the 3 short identification questions just need a paragraph to show that i am familiar with the answer to the Identifications. It is important to use only the material provided by the professor which i will link, if i haven’t linked enough or the proper information, message me so i can find more lessons for you to use. It is a bit of a demanding assignment so i’m prepared to offer more lessons and information from the teacher, as well as a tip for a good assignment considering this is hard.
Assignment
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activ
Assignment
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 17. Also, Chapter 11 and 12 from Week 6 might still be relevant.
Lesson
Minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.
Instructions
This is Part II of the assignment you submitted in Week 6.
Using the case outline (Part I: How the Courts Address or Respect Our Rights as Citizens) you submitted in Week 6, prepare and submit a presentation, which will either be a narrated PowerPoint, a Kaltura Video, or some other format as approved by your instructor. Be sure to verify the presentation format with your instructor before starting work on this assignment.
The presentation Point presentation will need to include:
Name the case
Discuss the facts of the case
Discuss the history of the case (what laws or legal action was taken)
Discuss the issues or the facts of the case and legal questions the court must decide
Discuss if the court’s decision or holdings was for the plaintiff or for the defendant and what were the reasons for the decision?
Discuss the concurring and dissenting opinions from the judge or if a jury trial, the jury.
Important: In this assignment, you are expected to elaborate the points you made in the prior assignment in Week 6. This assignment will be graded on your strength to elaborate and explain the facts of the case and proper use of visual aids, good narration, and presenting to the case and how well you stick to the case. For example, if you are using the PowerPoint, you are also expected to include proper visuals that are relevant to the case. Do not copy-paste the outline into this and call it complete.
This assignment is worth 225 points.
Requirements
Length: The presentation must be 10-15 slides long if using PowerPoint (excluding cover and reference pages) or 3-5 minute long if using a video presentation.
Font should not be smaller than size 16-point
Parenthetical in-text citations included and formatted in APA style
Title/Introduction slide required
References slide minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to textbook if cited)
Use the speaker notes to elaborate on the content on the slides
textbook link:
https://ambassadored.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9780135246849/pageid/0
I included the court case outline I chose to do
if I did no select the right form please let me know what need to add to fulfill this assignment!
Begin your argumentative synthesis essay with a strong thesis stating a particul
Begin your argumentative synthesis essay with a strong thesis stating a particular position on Colonialism and its aftermath . There are several possible reasons for writing an argument essay. They include: To compare topics or ideas To argue the position To evaluate the text To explain cause and effect relationships. Cite your sources in Chicago style in an endnote page. Your purpose as the author will determine the approach to writing the article. It also specifies how information is presented. Once you take a side, stick with it. You can provide counterarguments, but they should be minimal and weaker than your main arguments. Try to summarize your thoughts before writing so that you do not include too much information in your papers. Your readers want to read a composite project, not the actual work. By presenting the facts directly, you risk being misinterpreted by the reader. All synthesis essays must be no more than 1,000 words. For comparison, a typical opinion article is 800 words. 800 words is a good goal. I put one source for you in (PART 1), and the rest of the sources are from you. Chicago style pleas.
Please, Please don’t use ChatGPT. If your answer gets flagged by the detection s
Please, Please don’t use ChatGPT. If your answer gets flagged by the detection software, you
will have to re-write it. Thanks. Also No plagiarism. EVERYTHING SHOULD BE IN YOUR OWN WORDS NO OUTSIDE SOURCES ALLOWED
2. Does Japan’s constitution allow it to have a military? What do the US-Japan security
(anpo) treaties require from Japan? Are the treaties consistent with the constitution? (The treaties don’t align with the constitution. The treaties require to maintain a Japanese force.)
3. Park Chung Hee rebuilt South Korea’s economy. What, if any, were the downsides of his
approach?(What about human rights?)
4. What is the relationship between knowledge and politics for Mao? (The political sector isn’t separate from any other sector. Look at the “On Practice” essay)
5. What were some of the causes of the 1968 Shinjuku riots? (Why did young people feel alienated?)
6. According to Mao, what’s the correct way to approach contradictions?(Do you start with the fundamental contradicitons or the local contradictions?)
10. According to Kim Il Sung, how many Koreas were there? In his mind, what was the best
strategy for unifying the peninsula? (What did socialist construction mean?)
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1qi1k1CBF5e…
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/18_rC-66jSe…
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/17z7IY3H5qI…
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1v8bxJsubzQ…
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/181oWbAtdzS…
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1A6SVKM8mgE…
For these six questions, I put what the professor said to do for the revision in parentheses. Add another 100 words to each question answer, answering what is put in parentheses.
In a 4 to 6 page paper, double spaced, 12 font, Times New Roman, address the 3 p
In a 4 to 6 page paper, double spaced, 12 font, Times New Roman, address the 3 prompts below. Please answer the prompts in order. This assignment is intended to be an overview of ALL the material and concepts encountered this semester. Your task is to place the various political ideas in conversation with one another. Remember, mere summary will not be sufficient to receive a top score. You are being asked to analytically dissect the many arguments and views we have studied and explain why the authors hold these views. Additionally, your ability to construct, explain, and defend your own views is being reviewed as well.
Grading Components:
• Clarity / Grammar
• Appropriate and sufficient citation
• Sufficient incorporation of course material
• Soundness and comprehensiveness of student’s views
Questions:
1. Discuss the various conceptions of justice articulated this semester. What are their strengths (advantages)? What are their weaknesses? These can be theoretical or practical. Explain whether or not a conception (or conceptions of justice) is / are important for a political society.
2. Explain the significance of political legitimacy. What are some features associated with political legitimacy the average person would expect to observe? Are there any ways (methods or metrics) to determine to what degree / extent a society is politically legitimate? Is it necessary that a political legitimate society is also fully just?
3. What is the relationship between change and political legitimacy? If we determine political change is needed in a society, what is the best method to bring about that change? Be sure to address the distinction between reform and revolution. Are there any important practical considerations? Are there any important moral consideration?