Category: Political Science

part one
About
iPoliSci Workshops is your opportunity to interact with content r

part one
About
iPoliSci Workshops is your opportunity to interact with content related to the course.
At the minimum, at least once every two weeks (bi-weekly), you need to watch a single video recording of a workshop.
Submission of this assignment is REQUIRED.
Estimated Time
An estimated 60-90 minutes is needed to complete this activity.
Archived Recordings of Past Workshops
Global Conflict and Cooperation
Global Conflict and Cooperation is a workshop series that is focused on defining, exploring, and discussing global conflict and cooperation from the point of view of different international institutions, country governments, and international non-governmental organizations.
When is the Global Conflict and Cooperation Workshop scheduled?There are no real-time live workshops for this term.
There are video recordings of the workshop available from summer 2021, fall 2021. and Summer 2022.
Visit Global Conflict and Cooperation (ipolisci.com)Links to an external site. or iPoliSci – YouTubeLinks to an external site. to watch recordings.
Poliventure!
Poliventure! is a workshop series that explores how games relate to concepts in political science.
When is the Poliventure Workshop scheduled?There are no real-time live workshops for this term.
There are video recordings of the workshop available from summer 2021 and fall 2021.
Visit Poliventure (ipolisci.com)Links to an external site. or iPoliSci – YouTubeLinks to an external site. to watch recordings.
Instructions
Step 1: Watch an Archived Recording
Watch an archived recording of one of the workshops above.
Step 2: Clearly State Which Workshop You Watched
In your assignment submission, clearly state which workshop(s) you participated in during the period.
Example: “I watched Global Conflict and Cooperation during week 4.”
Example: “I watched the week 6 archived recording of Poliventure.”
Step 3: Respond to a Specific Question
Select 1 of the following questions to respond to:
What did you find most interesting about the workshop?
What did you find most relevant to your daily life about the workshop?
What question(s) do you have about the workshop topic?
What would you like to learn more about related to the workshop topic?
What did you find perplexing or challenging about the workshop topic?
Note: If you wish, you can ask yourself your own question.
Step 4: Clearly State your Question.
Be sure to clearly state this question in your assignment submission.
Using a question provided in the prior step, or a question that you ask yourself, be sure to clearly state this question in your assignment submission.
Step 5: Answer Question with 4 Sentences
Write at least 4 sentences answering the question you selected.
Sentence 1.
Sentence 2.
Sentence 3.
Sentence 4.
Step 6: Keep a List of Workshops You Watched
You are asked to watch at least 4 iPoliSci Workshops over the entire course.
Please keep a list of the workshops you watched.
Include your list of Workshops Watched for Week 01-02, Week 03-04, Week 05-06, and Week 07-08.
Submission Template
To help you get started, below is a submission template that includes the required parts. You can copy and paste this text to help organize your assessment submission.
### Start Copy and Paste ###
*** Start Sample ***
Workshop WatchedCopy and Paste Name and Link Here
Question I am Going to Answer [Select ONLY 1 question, delete the others]What did you find most interesting about the workshop?
What did you find most relevant to your daily life about the workshop?
What question(s) do you have about the workshop topic?
What would you like to learn more about related to the workshop topic?
What did you find perplexing or challenging about the workshop topic?
Note: If you wish, you can ask yourself your own question.
Answer to the Question above4 sentence
…………..
…
……
…….
..part two
My Reflection
About
Reflections are an opportunity for you share with me, your professor, your thoughts about the Public Policy Project. No other student will read your reflection.Estimated Time
An estimated 2 hours is needed to complete this activity.Instructions
Please write at least 6 sentences reflecting on the Public Policy Project.Sentence #1: Your 1st Sentence should be a question. Examples of questions include:What did you find most interesting about the Public Policy Project? Why did you find this the most interesting?
What did you find most relevant to your daily life about the Public Policy Project? Why did you find this the most relevant?
You are welcome to ask and answer your own question.
Sentence #2-6: Sentences 2 through 6 should be your response to the question you posed in sentence #1.

Analyzing a Peer-Reviewed Article
About
Journal articles are peer-reviewed publi

Analyzing a Peer-Reviewed Article
About
Journal articles are peer-reviewed publications that help scholars communicate ideas, theories, empirical analyses, and conclusions.
The ability to critically read journal articles is a skill that is developed with practice. This skill is especially useful when you transfer to a 4-year college or university.
If you are contemplating attending graduate school to earn a Masters, professional, or Doctoral degree, then analyzing journal articles is an essential skill.
Analyzing a journal article is related to reading. Reading is a skill that is developed with practice and is important for your future academic, professional, and personal endeavors.
Academically, your reading load will increase with each semester you are in higher education. Building that skill now will serve you well into the future.
Professionally, you will have contracts, employee handbooks, technical manuals, financial reports, and other documents to read.
Personally, your son, daughter, nephew, or niece will need you to teach them to read.
Estimated Time
An estimated 5 hours is needed to complete this activity.
Instructions
Step 1: Obtain the Article
You have three options for obtaining and viewing the article.
Option 1 – Read on Accessible Webpage: UN Peacekeeping and Households’ Well‐Being in Civil Wars – Bove – 2022 – American Journal of Political Science – Wiley Online LibraryLinks to an external site. The article’s tables, charts, or graphs are unfortunately not accessible for some screen readers. However, the contents of tables, charts, or graphs are sufficiently explained in the body of the article.
Option 2 – Download PDF: DownloadLinks to an external site. a PDF copy of the journal article from OPoliSci.com.
Option 3 – View in Canvas
Step 2: Analyze the Article
Identify the 12 parts of the article, as described in the Anatomy of a Journal Article and elaborated upon in the Details of Analyzing Journal Articles, and you can also review the Walkthrough.Need Help? Attend an Ask Me Anything about the JAA, SIM, or PPP iPoliSci Workshop during scheduled times.
Need Help? Schedule an appointmentLinks to an external site. with Dr. Josh Franco.
Need Help? Schedule a tutoring appointment with the Writing Center if you want a 3rd party to help you think through this assignment.
Step 3: Demonstrate identification of parts
Recall there are twelve parts of a journal article:
The Title of an article appears on the first page of the article. The Title is brief, typically no more than 5-10 words, and identifies for the reader the subject of the article.
The Main Point of an article is typically found in the Abstract. An Abstract is a summary of the article which is located on the first page, after the Title. The main point may be in the Introduction of the article.
The Question of an article is typically found in the Abstract. The question may be in the Introduction of the article as well.
The Puzzle is a missing piece of knowledge that the article seeks to fulfill.
The Debate is how scholars currently argue the subject of the article. Debates have at least two sides, and the two sides we are most familiar with are “pro” and “con”. However, debates can be more complex.
The Theory is how the author thinks something works. For example, we may have a theory about how campaigns influence voters. Theories consists of constants, variables, and the relationships between variables.
The Hypotheses are derived from the Theory. A hypothesis is the expectation that one variable affects another variable in a specific way.
The Research Design is how the author compares the effect of the explanatory variable (X) on the outcome variable (O) in a group (G) or set of groups.
The Empirical Analysis is the use of quantitative or qualitative evidence to explore whether the hypothesized relationship between two variables does indeed occur in the world.
The Policy Implications are how the findings of the article should influence the behavior of individuals, groups, organizations, or governments.
The Contribution to the Discipline is how the article helps fill the missing Puzzle piece.
Future Research offers suggestions for future research that build on the findings from the article.
You need to identify each part, with the exception of needing to write out a Research Design, which is explained in the next step.
Where you annotate each part depends on whether you are annotating on a paper copy or electronic copy of the journal article.
Paper: hand write on the margins or the back of the page.
Electronic: electronically highlight the text and/or comment in margins of the page.
Step 4: Write Out the Research Design
Read JAA – Writing out a Research Design.
Of the 12 parts, only one of them needs to be written out: Research Design. The Research Design is how the author compares the effect of the explanatory variable (X) on the outcome variable (O) in a group (G) or set of groups.
I want to emphasize that you need to use the G O X notation when writing out a Research Design.
Again, I want to emphasize that you need to use the G O X notation when writing out a Research Design.
Step 5: Use Student Annotation within Canvas or Upload your file upload submission
Student Annotation within Canvas:Visit Assignments: Student Annotation SubmissionsLinks to an external site. for brief overview of using Student Annotation within Canvas.
Paper: If you hand wrote your analysis on a printed paper, please use CamScanner appLinks to an external site., use “Batch” function to take pictures of each page and create a single PDF. After a single PDF is created, please upload the file.
Electronic Option 1: If you used Adobe PDF software, or some other software, to annotate, then you can upload the annotated file.
Electronic Option 2: You can try annotating in the Canvas Student App.How do I submit a PDF assignment with annotations in the Student app on my iOS device?Links to an external site.
How do I submit a PDF assignment with annotations in the Student app on my Android device?Links to an external site.
Support
Can you explain the 12 parts in more detail?
Yes, if needed, return to the Details of Analyzing Journal Articles page and the Walkthrough Presentation for clarification on the concept.
Why do I have a hard time finding the Research Design in an article?
Research design notation is not common in political science journal articles.
Part of the reason is that political scientists do not agree on a conceptual, let alone an operational, definition of research design.
This lack of agreement is a function of the diversity of graduate training and experience that political scientist have.
Can I read a walkthrough of a Two-Group, Pre-test and Post-test Research Design?
Yes, read JAA – Writing out a Research Design.
Where can I find an in-depth discussion of research design?
For an in-depth discussion on research design, you can read Chapter 6 – Elements of Research Design in Introduction to Political Science Research MethodsLinks to an external site..
How do I view annotation feedback comments?
Go to How do I view annotation feedback comments from my instructor directly in my assignment submission?Links to an external site. to learn how I directly include feedback on the file you upload, compared to the Assignment Comments or Rubric Results.
Do you host live Zoom workshops for the Journal Article Analysis?
Yes, visit the iPoliSci Workshops assignments located in every weekly module for a schedule of Journal Article Analysis workshops or Ask Me Anything workshops.
this is the article
f

part one
Analyzing a Peer-Reviewed Article
About
Journal articles are peer-revie

part one
Analyzing a Peer-Reviewed Article
About
Journal articles are peer-reviewed publications that help scholars communicate ideas, theories, empirical analyses, and conclusions.
The ability to critically read journal articles is a skill that is developed with practice. This skill is especially useful when you transfer to a 4-year college or university.
If you are contemplating attending graduate school to earn a Masters, professional, or Doctoral degree, then analyzing journal articles is an essential skill.
Analyzing a journal article is related to reading. Reading is a skill that is developed with practice and is important for your future academic, professional, and personal endeavors.
Academically, your reading load will increase with each semester you are in higher education. Building that skill now will serve you well into the future.
Professionally, you will have contracts, employee handbooks, technical manuals, financial reports, and other documents to read.
Personally, your son, daughter, nephew, or niece will need you to teach them to read.
Estimated Time
An estimated 5 hours is needed to complete this activity.
Instructions
Step 1: Obtain the Article
You have three options for obtaining and viewing the article.
Option 1 – Read on Accessible Webpage: UN Peacekeeping and Households’ Well‐Being in Civil Wars – Bove – 2022 – American Journal of Political Science – Wiley Online LibraryLinks to an external site. The article’s tables, charts, or graphs are unfortunately not accessible for some screen readers. However, the contents of tables, charts, or graphs are sufficiently explained in the body of the article.
Option 2 – Download PDF: DownloadLinks to an external site. a PDF copy of the journal article from OPoliSci.com.
Option 3 – View in Canvas
Step 2: Analyze the Article
Identify the 12 parts of the article, as described in the Anatomy of a Journal Article and elaborated upon in the Details of Analyzing Journal Articles, and you can also review the Walkthrough.Need Help? Attend an Ask Me Anything about the JAA, SIM, or PPP iPoliSci Workshop during scheduled times.
Need Help? Schedule an appointmentLinks to an external site. with Dr. Josh Franco.
Need Help? Schedule a tutoring appointment with the Writing Center if you want a 3rd party to help you think through this assignment.
Step 3: Demonstrate identification of parts
Recall there are twelve parts of a journal article:
The Title of an article appears on the first page of the article. The Title is brief, typically no more than 5-10 words, and identifies for the reader the subject of the article.
The Main Point of an article is typically found in the Abstract. An Abstract is a summary of the article which is located on the first page, after the Title. The main point may be in the Introduction of the article.
The Question of an article is typically found in the Abstract. The question may be in the Introduction of the article as well.
The Puzzle is a missing piece of knowledge that the article seeks to fulfill.
The Debate is how scholars currently argue the subject of the article. Debates have at least two sides, and the two sides we are most familiar with are “pro” and “con”. However, debates can be more complex.
The Theory is how the author thinks something works. For example, we may have a theory about how campaigns influence voters. Theories consists of constants, variables, and the relationships between variables.
The Hypotheses are derived from the Theory. A hypothesis is the expectation that one variable affects another variable in a specific way.
The Research Design is how the author compares the effect of the explanatory variable (X) on the outcome variable (O) in a group (G) or set of groups.
The Empirical Analysis is the use of quantitative or qualitative evidence to explore whether the hypothesized relationship between two variables does indeed occur in the world.
The Policy Implications are how the findings of the article should influence the behavior of individuals, groups, organizations, or governments.
The Contribution to the Discipline is how the article helps fill the missing Puzzle piece.
Future Research offers suggestions for future research that build on the findings from the article.
You need to identify each part, with the exception of needing to write out a Research Design, which is explained in the next step.
Where you annotate each part depends on whether you are annotating on a paper copy or electronic copy of the journal article.
Paper: hand write on the margins or the back of the page.
Electronic: electronically highlight the text and/or comment in margins of the page.
Step 4: Write Out the Research Design
Read JAA – Writing out a Research Design.
Of the 12 parts, only one of them needs to be written out: Research Design. The Research Design is how the author compares the effect of the explanatory variable (X) on the outcome variable (O) in a group (G) or set of groups.
I want to emphasize that you need to use the G O X notation when writing out a Research Design.
Again, I want to emphasize that you need to use the G O X notation when writing out a Research Design.
Step 5: Use Student Annotation within Canvas or Upload your file upload submission
Student Annotation within Canvas:Visit Assignments: Student Annotation SubmissionsLinks to an external site. for brief overview of using Student Annotation within Canvas.
Paper: If you hand wrote your analysis on a printed paper, please use CamScanner appLinks to an external site., use “Batch” function to take pictures of each page and create a single PDF. After a single PDF is created, please upload the file.
Electronic Option 1: If you used Adobe PDF software, or some other software, to annotate, then you can upload the annotated file.
Electronic Option 2: You can try annotating in the Canvas Student App.How do I submit a PDF assignment with annotations in the Student app on my iOS device?Links to an external site.
How do I submit a PDF assignment with annotations in the Student app on my Android device?Links to an external site.
Support
Can you explain the 12 parts in more detail?
Yes, if needed, return to the Details of Analyzing Journal Articles page and the Walkthrough Presentation for clarification on the concept.
Why do I have a hard time finding the Research Design in an article?
Research design notation is not common in political science journal articles.
Part of the reason is that political scientists do not agree on a conceptual, let alone an operational, definition of research design.
This lack of agreement is a function of the diversity of graduate training and experience that political scientist have.
Can I read a walkthrough of a Two-Group, Pre-test and Post-test Research Design?
Yes, read JAA – Writing out a Research Design.
Where can I find an in-depth discussion of research design?
For an in-depth discussion on research design, you can read Chapter 6 – Elements of Research Design in Introduction to Political Science Research MethodsLinks to an external site..
How do I view annotation feedback comments?
Go to How do I view annotation feedback comments from my instructor directly in my assignment submission?Links to an external site. to learn how I directly include feedback on the file you upload, compared to the Assignment Comments or Rubric Results.
Do you host live Zoom workshops for the Journal Article Analysis?
Yes, visit the iPoliSci Workshops assignments located in every weekly module for a schedule of Journal Article Analysis workshops or Ask Me Anything workshops.
this is the article
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.part two
My Reflection
About
Reflections are an opportunity for you share with me, your professor, your thoughts about the Journal Article Analysis. No other student will read your reflection.
Estimated Time
An estimated 1 hour is needed to complete this activity.
Instructions
Please write at least 6 sentences reflecting on the Journal Article Analysis.
Sentence #1: Your 1st Sentence should be a question. Examples of questions include:
What did you find most interesting about the Journal Article Analysis? Why did you find this the most interesting?
What did you find most relevant to your daily life about the Journal Article Analysis? Why did you find this the most relevant?
You are welcome to ask and answer your own question.
Sentence #2-6: Sentences 2 through 6 should be your response to the question you posed in sentence #1.

Your paper will ask and answer a research question on a topic related to America

Your paper will ask and answer a research question on a topic related to American politics. (In other words, you have a thesis and a paper that supports it.)
You will use different sources of information in your paper. These sources must include peer-reviewed sources, preferably sourced from Google Scholar and/or the library website. This information might be supplemented by government websites and newspapers, etc. Except in very unusual circumstances, you are not to use whatever random website pops up when you Google your topic.
Your paper should be somewhere in the range of 5-6 pages, including a page or two of references that you cited throughout the paper. Use normal default margins with a 12-size font that is Times New Roman or something similar.
Use a well-accepted method of citation and references such as MLA.

An assessment of Israel-Turkey relations over the last 30 years. Mainly referenc

An assessment of Israel-Turkey relations over the last 30 years. Mainly references to statements by leaders.Citing 10 sources from websites and newspapers. Oxford style

follow the instructions and answer the questions below NO outside sources. 1.Des

follow the instructions and answer the questions below NO outside sources. 1.Describe cities and special and education districts, and regional agencies.
2.Explain the official budgetary process in CA.n California. 2. Please describe the legislature in California. Cite and reference one of the attached reading documents in each answer to the questions in APSA format. I attached using APSA format. I attached how to cite and reference the APSA format
Field, Mona. 2018. California Government and Politics Today (15th) is the source you must use for citing

I have chosen film, cinema, in my work in order to theorize difficult questions

I have chosen film, cinema, in my work in order to theorize difficult questions regarding democracy and difference. There are, however, many points of caution in choosing to use film. Films often can reinforce and affirm stereotyped and demeaning images of others; that is, film is as effective a tool for installing as it is for challenging and overcoming oppression. However, as I write in Chapter One, the fictionalized realism of film can allow for a sharing of the different experiences that individuals live through and can serve as a helpful tool to uncover the raw materials that make up our various social or cultural identities. In other words, and more specifically, film and film criticism facilitate the search for a location from which to envision a democratic politics in ways that are respectful of difference and that quite possibly can contribute to the transformation of one’s sensibilities by providing an opportunity to theorize and imagine a new or emerging politics from a position of eyewitness.
Identify two-feature length films not presented in class that you believe have the potential to transform one’s political sensibilities pertaining to deep differences. In addition to naming your recommendations, be sure to give a full citation and a short abstract for each of the two films you recommend.
In other words, students are to recommend two U.S. films (non-documentaries produced in the United States of America) within the past five years and that are not listed anywhere on the political science 1 course syllabus. Proper citations must follow this format: Film title. Dir. First Name Last Name. Distributor, Year of Release. Medium. Films excluded: Required Film Texts:
Barbie, 2023; Directed by Gerta Gerwig
Beach Rats, 2017; Directed by Eliza Hittman
Boys Don’t Cry, 1998; Directed by Kimberly Pierce
Boyz ‘N the Hood, 1991; Directed by John Singleton
Call Me By Your Name, 2017; Directed by Luca Quadagnino
Cesar Chavez: An American Hero, 2014; Directed by Diego Luna
Do the Right Thing, 1989; Directed by Spike Lee
Get Out, 2017; Directed by Jordan Peele
Loving, 2016; Directed by Jeff Nichols
Milk, 2008; Directed by Gus Van Sant
Moonlight, 2016; Directed by Barry Jenkins
My Own Private Idaho, 1991; Directed by Gus Van Sant
Selma, 2014; Directed by Ava DuVernay
Smoke Signals, 1998; Directed by Chris Eyre
Stonewall: Where Pride Began, 2015; Directed by Roland Emmerich
Straight Outta Compton, 2015; Directed by F. Gary Gray
The Birth of a Nation, 2016; Directed by Nate Parker
Twelve Years a Slave, 2013; Directed by Steve McQueen
*13th, 2016; Directed by Ava DuVernay
A Place of Rage, 1991; Directed by Pratibha Parmar
America in Black & White: A Question of Identity, 2003; Films for Humanities and Science
A Family Portrait, 2011; Directed by Melissa Leu and Jeff Haig (Student Film)
Cultural Criticism & Transformation, 1997; Featuring bell hooks and Directed by Sut Jhally
Ethnic Notions, 1986; Directed by Marlon Riggs
Exploring Society: Gender, 2005
Exploring Society: Race and Ethnicity, 2005
Exploring Society: Social Class, 2008
Further Off the Straight and Narrow: New Gay Visibility on Television, 2006; Katherine Sender
Generation M: Misogyny in Media and Culture, 2013; Directed by Thomas Keith
How Racism Harms White America, 2013; Directed by John Bracey
*I Am Not Your Negro, 2016; Directed by Raoul Peck
Latinos Beyond Reel: Challenging a Media Stereotype, 2012
Off the Straight and Narrow: Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals & Television, 1998
On White Privilege, 2008; Featuring Tim Wise
Reel Bad Arabs: How Hollywood Vilifies a People, 2006; Directed by Sut Jhally
Responding to Diversity; 2011; Directed by Rise Sanders Weir and Tracy Ullman
Soundtrack for a Revolution, 2009; Directed by Bill Guttentag
The Brandon Teena Story, 1998; Directed by Susan Muska and Greta Olafsdottir
The Bro Code: How Contemporary Culture Creates Sexist Men, 2011; Directed by Thomas Keith
*The Celluloid Closet, 1995; Directed by Rob Epstein and Jeffrey Friedman
3
The Empathy Gap: Masculinity & The Courage to Change, 2015; Directed by Thomas Keith
The Origins of Cultural Studies, 1989; Featuring Stuart Hall
*The Times of Harvey Milk, 1984; Directed by Rob Epstein
White Like Me, 2013; Featuring Tim Wise and Directed by S. Morris

I have suggested that we should engage and be engaged by those persons who see a

I have suggested that we should engage and be engaged by those persons who see and understand the world differently from those who sit comfortably within a dominant we society so that we might (re)imagine or discover a new place for democratic politics. And as film-goers who find ourselves more susceptible emotionally to the stimuli presented in a movie theatre, we can at times experience vicariously, yet deeply, the events, the stories, the lives of those who are different from ourselves. As individuals living in a multicultural and diverse society we should consider opening ourselves up to and welcoming such engagement and the possibilities for personal transformation in our individual sensibilities. Such a transformation might occur when one considers and compares the experiences of his or her life and the impact of those experiences on his or her identity next to those raw materials that make-up or construct the identity(ies) of those who are different from them, specifically those who have been marginalized, disregarded, and silenced by a dominant we society. I have suggested that when one truly sees Other, sees and hears the stories of difference crafted and told by the Other in film, one might come to respect the different voices and stories of those lives and thus allow him or herself to see and experience life from a new position, a transformed sensibility, where politics transcend convention. In other words, when we consider our lives next to those who are different from us, when we frame those different human stories next to our own personal human narrative we may come to understand how a particular human uncertainty and vulnerability informs all of our lives.
In 300-500 words share whether or not you believe film has the potential to transform one’s political sensibilities. And if you believe that your personal sensibilities have been (re)shaped or transformed by a particular film, say so. The objective here is to share your thoughts pertaining to the major thesis presented in Democracy and Difference. List of movies to choose from:
Ethnic Notions(1986)
A Place of Rage(1991)
Cultural Criticisms and Transformations(1997)
The Brandon Teena Story(1998)
Exploring Society: Gender(2002)
Exploring Society: Race and Ethnicity(2002)
America in Black & White: A Question of Identity(2003)
Social Class(2009)
Soundtrack for a Revolution(2010)
Responding to Diversity(2011)
A Family Portrait(2011)
White Like Me(2013)
Generation M(2013)
The Bro Code(2011)
Off the Straight & Narrow(1998)
Further Off the Straight & Narrow(2006)
How Racism Harms White Americans(2013)
Reel Bad Arabs(2006)
Tim Wise: On White Privlege()
Stuart Hall: The Origins of Cultural Studies(1989)
Latinos Beyond Reel(2012)
The Empathy Gap

Please answer this question in the most detailed manner possible. You should spe

Please answer this question in the most detailed manner possible. You should spend at least two or three paragraphs answering the question to answer effectively. Specifics and details are essential.
Please describe in detail the process in Congress for passing a bill into law.

Need to improve the strategy memo with following things:
the overall strategy is

Need to improve the strategy memo with following things:
the overall strategy is too long, need to be cut a little
need more detail on the way to reallocate the budget, make it more convinceable
like the steps of reallocating the budget
the opponent part is needed. Need to add the opponent in the coliation part.
How the members work together, ally, opponent.
Must follow the prompt as well.