Category: Photoshop

The meaning of Photoshop

Photoshop is:

• One of the most popular programs in the world.
• A flexible tool for visual solutions is such spheres as art, design, advertising, fashion, construction, architecture, animation, astronomy, science and publishing among others.
• An valuable skill for a variety of professionals.
• A way of self-expression for professional and amateur artists and designers.
• An invention that has changed our history, society and culture forever.

In the contemporary world, everyone loves and uses Photoshop. Photography and graphic design play an important role in the life of the modern society. Photography an Photoshop are the parts of a variety of fields and industries today. For example, Photoshop is a moving force of fashion and advertising, it dictates and reflects cultural and social trends and tendencies. Besides, it is used in science. It helps the astronomers to re-crate the images of space objects, it also allows the medical professionals to have a better idea of the mechanisms of a human body. Overall, Photoshop has penetrated almost every sphere of life of the modern people and facilitated very significant changes.

History of Photoshop

• Invented by Thomas and John Knoll.
• The first beta version of the program was called ImagePro and appeared in 1988 (Story par. 11). It was developed from an earlier application called Display.
• The Knoll brothers presented their application to Adobe and the history of Photoshop started. After Adobe signed their contract with the Knoll brothers, a huge number of developers began to work on the improvement of Photoshop.
• In 1990 the first version of Photoshop became available to the users (Story par. 17).
• One basic photo retouching through the first version of Photoshop cost about 300 dollars (A Quick History of Adobe Photoshop & Cool Facts Behind the Living Legend par. 5).

Ever since it was first invented in 1988, Photoshop became a legend and a starting point for the development of all the other graphic editing computer programs and applications. They layout of Photoshop is the basis for all the following editing programs. This way, Photoshop can be called the standard for image processing. Thomas and John Knoll have inherited their fathers love for photography and interest towards technologies. Their invention is massively popular and widely used today. It carried both positive and negative impacts on the modern society.

Opportunities Photoshop Provides

• Images can be used in various fields to demonstrate different processes (aging, construction, medical changes, natural processes.
• A photograph of a person allows altering their appearance (change body shape, colour of eyes, clothes, hair).
• Basically, any landscape, or object in the picture can be changed in an unlimited number of ways.

Main sphere affected by Photoshop, is art and design. Yet, it also offers a wide range of opportunities for visual communication through images. A number of social advertisements today do not have ay slogans or words at all, Photoshop allows them to be very eloquent and persuasive without making a verbal statement.

Positive Impact

• Photoshop has changed our approach to image processing and photography in general (no more darkrooms in the basement).
• The speed of photo-editing has increased rapidly, what took days and hours before how takes seconds.
• Photoshop provides wide opportunities for creativity.
• Image now is a flexible means that can be altered in a variety of ways.
• It created a new profession called graphic designer.
• It added a verb to our language (to photoshop means to edit an image).
• The whole world became more visual and peoples way of thinking changed developing a better ability to understand and process images.

Photoshop increased the importance of photography in our world. As images became digital and flexible, they quickly took their places in a variety of industries. As a result, nothing is impossible today, any idea can be re-created as a digital image which changes the ay we see the world. Besides, photography now is an important part of business as it is the basis of advertising.

Negative Impact

• Photoshop has changed the way humans view themselves offering unrealistically flawless photographs of people.
• Photoshop destroyed reliability of photographs, now they are not considered as a reliable evidence of anything because they can be easily changed.
• Some photographers believe that Photoshop has made the art of photography soulless and commercial because it is now available for everyone.

Photoshop and airbrushing used in fashion magazines and advertising presently facilitate high levels of distress in the society presenting perfect looking people. As a result, such issues as anorexia, bulimia, and depression become more frequent. Due to Photoshop images became more informative and creative but lost their validity and reliability presenting distorted reality. Some photographers still use darkrooms as they believe that old-fashioned methods of editing are more authentic and genuine.

Conclusion

• Photoshop has been introduced less than three decades ago.
• It has affected such industries as business, fashion, art, and science.
• It completely changed the popularity, meaning and potential of an image in our lives.

Humans are visual creatures, they require demonstrations as proofs of processes and happenings. Abstract thinking has always been very confusing. Photoshop is the tool the can put any abstract idea into life and provide a demonstration. This feature of Photoshop served as a leap for our society and its development, but also left some negative outcomes.

Works Cited

A Quick History of Adobe Photoshop & Cool Facts Behind the Living Legend. 1stwebesigner. 2015. Web.

Story, Derrick. From Darkroom to DesktopHow Photoshop Came to Light. 2000. Web.

When it comes to working in a commercial area where one is supposed to provide high-quality work in the field of images and the like, one tends to opt for Photoshop. But, if its a question of working at home and not requiring a great deal of professional touch, then, in that case, the only choice is Gimp. It stands for  the Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search. Both are photo manipulation programs  Photoshop is a commercial product that has been around for 15 years and GIMP is an open-source project that has been under active development since the mid-90s . For people who cant spend much money on software and dont even vote for pirated copies, for those, Gimp is the ultimate choice. The gimp has layers, alpha channels, a robust plugin architecture. When it comes to retouching personal photos, remove redeye, the Gimp is the only good choice one can make. If its a question of background replacement and selective colorization, again Gimp is voted highest.

On the other hand, people who use Photoshop, only use a fraction of its capabilities. For personal use, the Gimp will do everything and more but if you need a bitmap editor so you can create or edit images for commercial printing, you dont want the Gimp, you want Photoshop as the Gimp lacks most of the required commercial features. The hefty wad of cash one has to sacrifice to actually buy an authorized copy of Photoshop is a big prize indeed. It costs around $600 these days and so as far as price is concerned, Photoshop loses out on this area. On the other hand, the Gimp is free. In fact, it is Open Source. But, Photoshop has a couple of advantages over Gimp and they are that Photoshop has patented features and a common interface. Learning a new interface is painful for anybody, but it seems to be simply unacceptable for the graphics artist. Unfortunately, the first version of Gimp i.e., (0.5, I believe) was far from what one could have expected.

A couple of months after that, Gimp released its new version i.e. 0.99.5 which was indeed a great improvement from its earlier version. Now, the Gimp stands at version 1.2, reproduces the majority of Photoshops features, and offers a few more to boot. In terms of tools, the Gimp matches tool for tool against the most current version of Photoshop. The Layer features and masking which are also present in Photoshop are also very similar in the case of Gimp. There are similar sets of built-in filters also; in fact, filters are one of Gimps biggest features. One of the areas where Photoshop still holds an edge is its support for CMYK. All of Gimps operations currently take place in RGB mode, where all color values are stored as fractions of red, blue, and green. This is one of the main reasons why the Gimp doesnt hold much support in professional and commercial areas. On the positive side, it is heard that CMYK support is planned in the next coming version of Gimp i.e. 2.0. One of Gimps strong points is its filter capabilities. The built-in set of filters match up to Photoshops initial version. The additional filters that come with Gimp are unique and great for adding interesting features.

The wide variety of Gimp filters has allowed us to create some wonderful and interesting tiles. In addition, Gimp supports filters written in the Perl scripting language (using the gimp-Perl scripting module). Another area where Gimp stands out is in its key binding support. In Photoshop, certain commands had their own built-in keyboard shortcuts, which allowed users to quickly accomplish a certain basic task. Gimp added the ability to attach a key binding to any menu accessible feature.

Almost every single feature in Gimp can be attached to a particular keystroke combination (any combination of alt, control, shift, and another key can form a key binding). Adding these keybinds is just as easy: bring up the menu, move the mouse over a particular feature and press the desired keystroke combination. This is an invaluable feature that greatly increases productivity and speed of use in the case of Gimp.

One drawback that was seen from the point of view of certain Gimp users was its slowness to open large files and to apply filters, the unintuitive tools that accompany it, and its very visible bad quality of text and lines/shapes Despite this, one cant deny the overall quality that Gimp provides to home users. They dont plan to use it in commercial areas, but only at home. If thats what Gimp is supposed to do, then it would not be desirable to compare Gimp with Photoshop since even though they have almost the same applications, still, the field of use is entirely different and Gimp cant be shifted from home use to commercial use unless it removes some of its drawbacks which have been mentioned by some Photoshop and Gimp users as well. Photoshop also boasts about its feature, which provides resizable brushes for image enhancement. This is still not available in Gimp but brushes are still there. An image made in Photoshop and that in Gimp will be equally fine but still, one can make out the best out of the two.

Although Gimp incorporates multiple features of Photoshop, we cant tag Gimp as a clone of Photoshop in any case. It may happen, that the same things in Photoshop might have a different name in the case of Gimp but they perform practically the same work in both cases. A long-time Photoshop user might feel weird or absurd if at all asked to work with Gimp. Just for the reason that Photoshop is used in commercial areas whereas, Gimp is used at homes or for very small-scale jobs. Gimpshop is basically a rewrite of the XML files that generate the menus to be more Photoshop-like, and a shortcut file to remap the shortcuts to match Photoshop and a script that puts all of the Gimps windows in one big window.

According to most online users, most of them have been working on Linux and with that, they prefer Gimp to Photoshop. Even those who have been using Photoshop for a long, are now also inclined towards Gimp since its for free as it is open-source and also because of the reason that they can see the source code for themselves which they find very helpful. The Vector-based shape/text support is only to be found in Photoshop and not in Gimp according to the latest verdict given by some of the Linux developers. This was the biggest productivity enhancement feature added in Photoshop. Whatever the case may be, but if these few additions are made in the Gimp, then the world will surely and finally have an open-source replacement for Photoshop. But to let that happen, much work has to be done in that field since developers and other users who have been working with Photoshop do not want any other replacement. But, those who have tried Gimp for once, have shown great appreciation for it saying that if certain features are made available then Gimp will not be limited to home use only. Instead, it can be also used in commercial environments.

Does GIMP have what it takes to dethrone Adobe Photoshop as the standard?

Right now, the answer is no.

Having used both Photoshop and Gimp extensively, one can honestly quote Gimp to be the better product. Also, the fact that it is a free open-source program is an even greater boon. In a nutshell, Photoshop is for linear thinkers, and Gimp is for lateral thinkers.

The truth is, theyre both winners when theyre used in the proper context. The Gimp just doesnt have support in the areas that are necessary to make it useful in a commercial application. Bottom line, for website graphics and simple editing jobs its almost insane to spend the money to use Photoshop. And Gimp is likewise inadequate for the needs of a professional print shop or a commercial working environment.

But, in the end, Gimp is good for the average home user and Photoshop is advisable for commercial environments. Gimp is surely awaited to great-crash in the commercial fields too provided it fixes some of its features and gets ready for the neck-to-neck comparison with Photoshop.

The meaning of Photoshop

Photoshop is:

• One of the most popular programs in the world.
• A flexible tool for visual solutions is such spheres as art, design, advertising, fashion, construction, architecture, animation, astronomy, science and publishing among others.
• An valuable skill for a variety of professionals.
• A way of self-expression for professional and amateur artists and designers.
• An invention that has changed our history, society and culture forever.

In the contemporary world, everyone loves and uses Photoshop. Photography and graphic design play an important role in the life of the modern society. Photography an Photoshop are the parts of a variety of fields and industries today. For example, Photoshop is a moving force of fashion and advertising, it dictates and reflects cultural and social trends and tendencies. Besides, it is used in science. It helps the astronomers to re-crate the images of space objects, it also allows the medical professionals to have a better idea of the mechanisms of a human body. Overall, Photoshop has penetrated almost every sphere of life of the modern people and facilitated very significant changes.

History of Photoshop

• Invented by Thomas and John Knoll.
• The first beta version of the program was called ImagePro and appeared in 1988 (Story par. 11). It was developed from an earlier application called Display.
• The Knoll brothers presented their application to Adobe and the history of Photoshop started. After Adobe signed their contract with the Knoll brothers, a huge number of developers began to work on the improvement of Photoshop.
• In 1990 the first version of Photoshop became available to the users (Story par. 17).
• One basic photo retouching through the first version of Photoshop cost about 300 dollars (A Quick History of Adobe Photoshop & Cool Facts Behind the Living Legend par. 5).

Ever since it was first invented in 1988, Photoshop became a legend and a starting point for the development of all the other graphic editing computer programs and applications. They layout of Photoshop is the basis for all the following editing programs. This way, Photoshop can be called the standard for image processing. Thomas and John Knoll have inherited their father’s love for photography and interest towards technologies. Their invention is massively popular and widely used today. It carried both positive and negative impacts on the modern society.

Opportunities Photoshop Provides

• Images can be used in various fields to demonstrate different processes (aging, construction, medical changes, natural processes.
• A photograph of a person allows altering their appearance (change body shape, colour of eyes, clothes, hair).
• Basically, any landscape, or object in the picture can be changed in an unlimited number of ways.

Main sphere affected by Photoshop, is art and design. Yet, it also offers a wide range of opportunities for visual communication through images. A number of social advertisements today do not have ay slogans or words at all, Photoshop allows them to be very eloquent and persuasive without making a verbal statement.

Positive Impact

• Photoshop has changed our approach to image processing and photography in general (no more darkrooms in the basement).
• The speed of photo-editing has increased rapidly, what took days and hours before how takes seconds.
• Photoshop provides wide opportunities for creativity.
• Image now is a flexible means that can be altered in a variety of ways.
• It created a new profession called graphic designer.
• It added a verb to our language (“to photoshop” means to edit an image).
• The whole world became more visual and people’s way of thinking changed developing a better ability to understand and process images.

Photoshop increased the importance of photography in our world. As images became digital and flexible, they quickly took their places in a variety of industries. As a result, nothing is impossible today, any idea can be re-created as a digital image which changes the ay we see the world. Besides, photography now is an important part of business as it is the basis of advertising.

Negative Impact

• Photoshop has changed the way humans view themselves offering unrealistically flawless photographs of people.
• Photoshop destroyed reliability of photographs, now they are not considered as a reliable evidence of anything because they can be easily changed.
• Some photographers believe that Photoshop has made the art of photography soulless and commercial because it is now available for everyone.

Photoshop and airbrushing used in fashion magazines and advertising presently facilitate high levels of distress in the society presenting perfect looking people. As a result, such issues as anorexia, bulimia, and depression become more frequent. Due to Photoshop images became more informative and creative but lost their validity and reliability presenting distorted reality. Some photographers still use darkrooms as they believe that old-fashioned methods of editing are more authentic and genuine.

Conclusion

• Photoshop has been introduced less than three decades ago.
• It has affected such industries as business, fashion, art, and science.
• It completely changed the popularity, meaning and potential of an image in our lives.

Humans are visual creatures, they require demonstrations as proofs of processes and happenings. Abstract thinking has always been very confusing. Photoshop is the tool the can put any abstract idea into life and provide a demonstration. This feature of Photoshop served as a leap for our society and its development, but also left some negative outcomes.

Works Cited

A Quick History of Adobe Photoshop & Cool Facts Behind the Living Legend. 1stwebesigner. 2015. Web.

Story, Derrick. From Darkroom to Desktop—How Photoshop Came to Light. 2000. Web.

When it comes to working in a commercial area where one is supposed to provide high-quality work in the field of images and the like, one tends to opt for Photoshop. But, if it’s a question of working at home and not requiring a great deal of professional touch, then, in that case, the only choice is Gimp. It stands for – the Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search. Both are photo manipulation programs – Photoshop is a commercial product that has been around for 15 years and GIMP is an open-source project that has been under active development since the mid-90s . For people who can’t spend much money on software and don’t even vote for pirated copies, for those, Gimp is the ultimate choice. The gimp has layers, alpha channels, a robust plugin architecture. When it comes to retouching personal photos, remove redeye, the Gimp is the only good choice one can make. If it’s a question of background replacement and selective colorization, again Gimp is voted highest.

On the other hand, people who use Photoshop, only use a fraction of its capabilities. For personal use, the Gimp will do everything and more but if you need a bitmap editor so you can create or edit images for commercial printing, you don’t want the Gimp, you want Photoshop as the Gimp lacks most of the required commercial features. The hefty wad of cash one has to sacrifice to actually buy an authorized copy of Photoshop is a big prize indeed. It costs around $600 these days and so as far as price is concerned, Photoshop loses out on this area. On the other hand, the Gimp is free. In fact, it is Open Source. But, Photoshop has a couple of advantages over Gimp and they are that Photoshop has “patented features” and “a common interface”. Learning a new interface is painful for anybody, but it seems to be simply unacceptable for the graphics artist. Unfortunately, the first version of Gimp i.e., (0.5, I believe) was far from what one could have expected.

A couple of months after that, Gimp released its new version i.e. 0.99.5 which was indeed a great improvement from its earlier version. Now, the Gimp stands at version 1.2, reproduces the majority of Photoshop’s features, and offers a few more to boot. In terms of tools, the Gimp matches tool for tool against the most current version of Photoshop. The Layer features and masking which are also present in Photoshop are also very similar in the case of Gimp. There are similar sets of built-in filters also; in fact, filters are one of Gimp’s biggest features. One of the areas where Photoshop still holds an edge is its support for CMYK. All of Gimp’s operations currently take place in RGB mode, where all color values are stored as fractions of red, blue, and green. This is one of the main reasons why the Gimp doesn’t hold much support in professional and commercial areas. On the positive side, it is heard that CMYK support is planned in the next coming version of Gimp i.e. 2.0. One of Gimp’s strong points is its filter capabilities. The built-in set of filters match up to Photoshop’s initial version. The additional filters that come with Gimp are unique and great for adding interesting features.

The wide variety of Gimp filters has allowed us to create some wonderful and interesting tiles. In addition, Gimp supports filters written in the Perl scripting language (using the gimp-Perl scripting module). Another area where Gimp stands out is in its key binding support. In Photoshop, certain commands had their own built-in keyboard shortcuts, which allowed users to quickly accomplish a certain basic task. Gimp added the ability to attach a key binding to any menu accessible feature.

Almost every single feature in Gimp can be attached to a particular keystroke combination (any combination of alt, control, shift, and another key can form a key binding). Adding these keybinds is just as easy: bring up the menu, move the mouse over a particular feature and press the desired keystroke combination. This is an invaluable feature that greatly increases productivity and speed of use in the case of Gimp.

One drawback that was seen from the point of view of certain Gimp users was its slowness to open large files and to apply filters, the unintuitive tools that accompany it, and it’s very visible bad quality of text and lines/shapes Despite this, one can’t deny the overall quality that Gimp provides to home users. They don’t plan to use it in commercial areas, but only at home. If that’s what Gimp is supposed to do, then it would not be desirable to compare Gimp with Photoshop since even though they have almost the same applications, still, the field of use is entirely different and Gimp can’t be shifted from home use to commercial use unless it removes some of its drawbacks which have been mentioned by some Photoshop and Gimp users as well. Photoshop also boasts about its feature, which provides resizable brushes for image enhancement. This is still not available in Gimp but brushes are still there. An image made in Photoshop and that in Gimp will be equally fine but still, one can make out the best out of the two.

Although Gimp incorporates multiple features of Photoshop, we can’t tag Gimp as a clone of Photoshop in any case. It may happen, that the same things in Photoshop might have a different name in the case of Gimp but they perform practically the same work in both cases. A long-time Photoshop user might feel weird or absurd if at all asked to work with Gimp. Just for the reason that Photoshop is used in commercial areas whereas, Gimp is used at homes or for very small-scale jobs. Gimpshop is basically a rewrite of the XML files that generate the menus to be more Photoshop-like, and a shortcut file to remap the shortcuts to match Photoshop and a script that puts all of the Gimp’s windows in one big window.

According to most online users, most of them have been working on Linux and with that, they prefer Gimp to Photoshop. Even those who have been using Photoshop for a long, are now also inclined towards Gimp since it’s for free as it is open-source and also because of the reason that they can see the source code for themselves which they find very helpful. The Vector-based shape/text support is only to be found in Photoshop and not in Gimp according to the latest verdict given by some of the Linux developers. This was the biggest productivity enhancement feature added in Photoshop. Whatever the case may be, but if these few additions are made in the Gimp, then the world will surely and finally have an open-source replacement for Photoshop. But to let that happen, much work has to be done in that field since developers and other users who have been working with Photoshop do not want any other replacement. But, those who have tried Gimp for once, have shown great appreciation for it saying that if certain features are made available then Gimp will not be limited to home use only. Instead, it can be also used in commercial environments.

Does GIMP have what it takes to dethrone Adobe Photoshop as the standard?

Right now, the answer is no.

Having used both Photoshop and Gimp extensively, one can honestly quote Gimp to be the better product. Also, the fact that it is a free open-source program is an even greater boon. In a nutshell, Photoshop is for linear thinkers, and Gimp is for lateral thinkers.

The truth is, they’re both winners when they’re used in the proper context. The Gimp just doesn’t have support in the areas that are necessary to make it useful in a commercial application. Bottom line, for website graphics and simple editing jobs it’s almost insane to spend the money to use Photoshop. And Gimp is likewise inadequate for the needs of a professional print shop or a commercial working environment.

But, in the end, Gimp is good for the average home user and Photoshop is advisable for commercial environments. Gimp is surely awaited to great-crash in the commercial fields too provided it fixes some of its features and gets ready for the neck-to-neck comparison with Photoshop.

Introduction

Adobe Photoshop has had an enormously significant and pervasive impact on the graphic design industry in the modern era. Adobe Systems released Photoshop in the 1980s, and its use among photographers, editors, and designers has only grown (Bansal et al., 2022). Photoshop’s features have indeed made today’s graphics industry into a fantasy land where a designer’s wildest ideas may be realized with ease and clarity. Indeed, Photoshop is a wonderful tool that helps digital artists and photographers realize their visions. Photoshop dominates the digital photography world due to its unique characteristics and functionalities. Many digital artists have stated that Photoshop is more than just a means to an end, it is a blank slate that encourages them to create something extraordinary with their talents (Yao, 2021). Photoshop offers tremendous creative potential for modern graphics, thus enabling graphic designers to create wonderful designs that appeal to themselves and their audience.

How Photoshop Has Impacted Societys

Doubtless, Photoshop’s influence on how people consume media as a culture has been substantial. The question is whether or not the wide-ranging and ever-evolving consequences it produces are for the better or worse. There have been good and bad effects of Photoshop on society. Positively, Photoshop has freed up the imaginations of those who work in graphic design (Al-Qudah, and Al Shari, 2020). When thinking about art, Photoshop is an invaluable tool for graphic designers. However, on the negative end, Photoshop promotes an unattainable ideal of perfection (Fajoye, 2021; Scorzin, 2021). For instance, many people’s sense of self-worth is directly hit by advertisements featuring photoshopped models with flat stomachs and flawless skin. The barrier between what is real and what is not starting to blur as technology improves reality. People’s self-esteem and mental health might be affected when they measure themselves against an ideal that does not exist.

Another way in which Photoshop has influenced society is by lowering the input cost for graphic design. Before Photoshop, businesses had to outsource to acquire the up-to-standard images required (Bui, 2021; Zhu, 2021). This process used to take much longer and cost a lot more money. Fortunately, the world of graphic design shifted with the “birth” of Photoshop and other technological innovations. The change was gradual at first but accelerated once Photoshop was released and many people learned how to use it (Zhang and Chang, 2020). Looking ahead to the present day, the influence of this program is immense. Therefore, it is no surprise that many people utilize Photoshop now that it offers hundreds of useful tools for graphic design in its newest editions.

Telling if an Object Is Real

Adobe Photoshop and other programs that modify graphics make image manipulation accessible to a wide audience. Practically everyone is capable of taking a picture and editing it in ways that are difficult to spot. It is not uncommon for fashion magazines, social media influencers, and even politicians to be guilty of using photo editing software to alter images (Cooke et al., 2022). Many possibly edited photographs are circulating on the internet, and the issue remains regarding how one can detect whether or not a picture has been manipulated.

Examining the borders, checking for inverted writing, and looking at any shadows might help you determine if a visual item is real or not. When anything has been digitally added to a scene, the borders may reveal it. A common sign of the employment of Photoshop’s Quick Select or Magic Wand tool is the appearance of jagged edges in the vicinity of the selected area. Some individuals habitually invert photographs without considering the text that may be included in the image. Seeing text written correctly in one section of the image and backward in another could be an indication that it has been edited the wrong way throughout the entire image. Furthermore, errors in shadows frequently disclose when a picture has been modified. For example, applying a drop shadow at an inappropriate place is a common mistake. It is also easy to tell when there are not any shadows. When something is digitally added to a photograph, sometimes the shadow is either not included or is projected artificially.

Additionally, one can determine if an item is manipulated by checking for characteristics like missing reflections, poor perspective, and traces of objects that should not be there. If you suspect a picture has been altered, search for reflective surfaces like mirrors. Photo editors frequently fail to consider reflections that should be seen in the final product. When an item shot at ground level is superimposed over one captured at a higher elevation, the result is a distorted picture that seems unrealistic. Occasionally, someone may wish to Photoshop an unwanted subject out of a photograph. However, occasionally they reveal their true selves by leaving behind an incriminating reflection or body part.

Determining whether an image is real or not is critical. The fact that photoshop provides an opportunity to manipulate images does not provide room to dismiss the quality that original images command. At certain points, it is better off having original images for specific uses rather than ones edited using photoshop. It is, therefore, important to know how to identify original photographs or images from edited ones, to enhance a diversified usability of images.

Impact of Digital Technology on Creativity

The widespread availability of digital tools has facilitated the networking of creative individuals and the dissemination of their ideas. The convergence of digital tools and artistic expression has spawned novel thoughts and methods of self-expression (Holford, 2019; Oke and Fernandes, 2020). Several studies have indicated that creative persons have higher “soft skills” levels than ordinary workers (Asbari et al., 2020; Sopa et al., 2020). Creative people are also typically superior at working in teams, applying critical thinking, and conveying their ideas to others.

If utilized correctly and within established parameters, digital technology can facilitate or enhance original thought. If put to good use, it can broaden one’s perspectives by revealing novel pathways toward one’s goals (Bryndin, 2019). However, when it is misused, it may give individuals too much power and sap the motivation that comes from having original ideas and figuring out how to put them into action (Huda 2018). In this day of constant mobility and overwhelming work, the ease and speed, with which technological advances can make ideas a reality, are appealing.

Conclusion

Without a doubt, Photoshop has contributed significantly to enhancing human life. A great deal of change has occurred in the field of graphic design as a result of this editing software. In addition, proficiency in Photoshop has become an in-demand ability, contributing to the proliferation of creative advertising campaigns and hilarious web-based entertainment. Finally, Photoshop, as a digital tool, has made possible a setting in which artists are free to experiment, leading to wonderful works.

Reference List

Al-Qudah, A.A. and Al Shari, A.J.H., (2020). The effect of using modern technology on graphic designers’ skills in Jordan Arts in the shadow of cultural and political transformations and technology. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(7), pp.14211-14233. Web.

Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., Ong, F., Mustikasiwi, A., Maesaroh, S., Mustofa, M., Hutagalung, D. and Andriyani, Y., (2020). Impact of Hard Skills, Soft Skills and Organizational Culture: Lecturer Innovation Competencies As Mediating. EduPsyCouns: Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1), pp.101-121. Web.

Bansal, J., Balodi, K.C., Jain, R. and Datta, S., (2022). Strategy and business model evolution at adobe: Competing in digital media software industry. Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases, p.20438869221116391. Web.

Bryndin, E., (2019). Collaboration of intelligent interoperable agents via smart interface. International Journal on Data Science and Technology, 5(4), pp.66-72. Web.

Bui, N., (2021). How motion graphics affect marketing campaigns. Thesis: Vaasan Ammattikorkeakoulu University of Applied Sciences. Web.

Cooke, P., Nunes, S., Oliva, S. and Lazzeretti, L., (2022). Open Innovation, Soft Branding and Green Influencers: Critiquing ‘Fast Fashion’and ‘Overtourism’. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), p.52. Web.

Fajoye, A., (2021). The role of image photoshopping in advertisement. Global Journal of Education, Humanities & Management Sciences, 3(1). Web.

Holford, W.D., (2019). The future of human creative knowledge work within the digital economy. Futures, 105, pp.143-154. Web.

Huda, M., (2018). Empowering application strategy in the technology adoption: insights from professional and ethical engagement. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management.

Oke, A. and Fernandes, F.A.P., (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning: Exploring the perceptions of the education sector on the 4th industrial revolution (4IR). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), p.31. Web.

Scorzin, P.C., (2021). ‘More human than human’. Digital dolls on social media. denkste: puppe-multidisziplinäre zeitschrift für mensch-puppen-diskurse, 4(1), pp.157-166. Web.

Sopa, A., Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., Santoso, P.B., Mustofa, D.H., Maesaroh, S. and Primahendra, R., (2020). Hard skills versus soft skills: which are more important for Indonesian employees innovation capability. International Journal of Control and Automation, 13(2), pp.156-175.

Yao, Y., (2021). Research on the Application of Computer Graphics Software in Graphic Advertisement Design. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1992, No. 2, p. 022024). IOP Publishing. Web.

Zhang, T. and Chang, Y., (2020). Application of photoshop technology based on computer graphic design software. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Power, Intelligent Computing and Systems (ICPICS) (pp. 461-466). IEEE.

Zhu, L., (2021). Computer-aided art design Ps course teaching based on FPGA and embedded system graphics processing. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 81, p.103650. Web.

Introduction: When the Magic Starts

Crossing the threshold of the XXI century, the humankind has developed a number of peculiar and incredible computer technologies, including the ones that deal with visuals and change people’s perception of reality completely, offering the transformations that capture with their beauty and make the world of the ordinary brighter.

With the help of the Photoshop effect, a number of emotions and ideas can be expressed, even though an image lacks certain expressivity, being completely deprived of the sound component. Once comprising certain visual effects that Photoshop can provide, one is likely to reach the pinnacle of artistic expressivity, creating an original masterpiece out of the piece of the ordinary.

Analyzing several specific properties of Photoshop, as well as the skills that it allows one to master and the projects that can be implemented with the help of Photoshop, one will be able to obtain a general idea of the amazing program.

Once seeing the prospects that the given program offers to the world of design, one will be able to use it more efficiently. With the help of Photoshop skills and projects, images will speak to the public and address the latter on behalf of the artist.

Why People Need It: On the Purpose of Photoshop

It cannot be doubted that with the help of Photoshop, images obtain the specific tint of authenticity. On the one hand, the standard Photoshop filters make images rather artificial; however, on the other hand, with the help of Photoshop skills, one can crate the image that will bear the unique features that none of the images does.

Adding either the effect of the artificial, or, on the contrary, the illusion of complete realism, Photoshop skills and projects offer a plethora of ideas to consider. Among the most promising projects and skills that Photoshop offers, Selection, Painting, Puppet Warp and 3D Repousse should be mentioned. Considering the above-mentioned elements closer, one can obtain a clear vision of what Photoshop can offer to its users.

Mastering the Art of Painting: Photoshop Skills

Even though some people consider Photoshop one of the most complicated programs to master, acquiring the skills that are necessary for an efficient work with Photoshop is rather fast process.

However, since it is obvious that the options offered by Photoshop are truly countless, it will be wiser to consider several most enticing ones in the given paper. Offering a detailed overview of several properties that Photoshop includes and skills that the program helps to develop in the inexperienced artists, one will be able to demonstrate the efficacy and the importance of and skills in the modern design.

Selection: Making the Right Choice

One of the most enticing options that Photoshop can offer its users, the Selection procedure presupposes that the user has the skills to operate a number of specific tools in Photoshop, like the Magic Wand, the Lasso tool, the Move and the Quick Selection. Once mastering the tactics mentioned above, one is likely to come up with the most inspiring project.

It is necessary to mark that with the abundance of the selection types that Photoshop offers, the program allows to choose the exact portion of image that is required for the given composition and to insert it precisely into the place that you have picked for your picture. Hence, the most unbelievable and at the same time the most credible collages can be created with the help of the given tools.

Considering the elements somewhat closer, one should mark that the Move Tool, which is not technically designed for selection, also belongs to the given category, since it allows to locate the chosen piece of picture that has already been selected.

Painting: The Colors of the Rainbow

However, even though selecting certain pieces of pictures plays great role in the art of Photoshop, one must admit that the given program is much more about creating images and, hence, the art of drawing.

As an integral part and parcel of the latter, the skill of painting in Photoshop is the talent that also has to be learned by any designer. It must be admitted that the program offers more than enough possibilities for mastering the art of painting, which s why the toolkit that allows the user to paint should be considered closer.

Using the techniques of selection mentioned above, one can edit any picture with the help of the painting option. One of the most important functions that Photoshop allows to use is the choice of brushes, their size, shape and the thickness of the line.

It is also essential to mention such element of painting in Photoshop as the ability to imitate the charcoal painting, as well as the pastel one and painting with pastels and oil.

The Projects to Implement: Photoshop Assistance

In addition to a number of specific Photoshop techniques and skills that one can mater with the help of the program to create the most expressive pictures and the most outstanding masterpieces of digital design, one should mention the opportunity to introduce the specific projects with the help of Photoshop.

Once learning the techniques that allow to create all sorts of design in Photoshop, one is likely to reach the top of designing art. Taking a closer look at the abundance of the existing projects that Photoshop allows to implement, one will be able to embrace the pool of opportunities that Photoshop offers the public.

When considering the specific projects that Photoshop suggests to learn more about, one should take into account that each of the projects that Photoshop offers presupposes mastering a number of Photoshop skills. One of the basic skills, Selection, is used efficiently in the given project, which makes it obvious that the elements of Photoshop design are intertwined and depend on each other.

Puppet Warp. Become a Puppeteer

Feeling the lord of puppets might sound not quite enticing, yet the project called Puppet Warp involves a number of specific elements that are likely to entice the user with the scale of the opportunities that they presuppose. One of the most impressive ones, the Puppet Warp permits the user to distort the images with the incredible accuracy and create the warped images of the original visuals.

It is essential that once you have your image in front of you in your Photoshop project and can shape it according to your plan, you can have the mesh visible on your puppet; moreover, the mesh on the object can be readjusted according to the initial demands, which is rather impressive and contributes to the high precision.

As soon as the points are attached to the alleged puppet and are reshaped, one will obtain the image with the elements that can twist and bend. However, it is essential to mark that the flexibility of the elements depends on the initial mesh; the more points the object, a letter in the given case, has, the more rubber-like it looks, which provides an unforgettable impression.

When Words Speak Louder than Actions

Another amazing technique that requires considerable attention and thorough research, Painting with Words is more than merely using certain font – this is the point at which the idea of conveying a verbal message and creating an image that will convey both the textual and the visual message. However, it is essential to mark that the procedure presupposes taking several steps to create a work containing painting with words technique.

One of the most important elements of the given procedure, the use of the lasso tool is absolutely necessary. Grabbing the text with lasso, one can merge it with the visual part, thus, creating an original painting.

It is also crucial to use the brushes of different textures and sizes to readjust the text to the visuals and create compatible patterns. Thus, Painting with Words proves another means to incorporate the textual and the visual message into a single entity, which is the basic principle of an artist’s work.

Summary: The Point Being

There is no doubt that with the help of Photoshop, one can improve one’s designing skills and crate the works that contain the most impressive visuals and emphasize the idea of the project.

With the help of such techniques as selection, painting, Puppet Warp and Painting with Words, one is likely to create lively and gripping visuals that convey a specific message to the public. Hence, it is obvious that with the advent of the new Photoshop technologies, one is likely to crate the most expressive visuals to convey certain ideas to the public.

Considering the idea of using the Photoshop filters from a viewpoint of a graphic designer, one must admit that the program offers a plethora of opportunities for the users and allows to create more expressive patterns and designs.

Conclusion: Click the Red X in the Right Upper Corner

Though it is obvious that Photoshop allows designers to look beyond the horizon of the horizon of the ordinary, it is essential to keep in mind that the program presupposes not only the use of the technologies and the visual effects that Photoshop offers to the devoted public, one should keep in mind that mastering the designer skills is also important in the given case.

What should ne learned once and for all is that the program offers merely a bunch of top-quality instruments and the ability to choose the most efficient ones. Moreover, it is important that in Photoshop, one can erase the dissatisfying result and start anew; yet it is worth remembering that the program is merely an assistant in acquiring skills and developing one’s own taste and instinct for the fine art.

Photoshop Strengths

Assessing my own skills in the field of picture editing with the help of Photoshop, I need to say that my Photoshop strengths concern the ability to introduce the image in an original way using the new approaches.

The Researcher’s Qualities

Speaking of my researcher qualities, I would like to emphasize my ability to incorporate the unique approach and to follow the established scheme, incorporating previous experiences. Hence, it seems that with my researcher abilities, I will handle the new Photoshop project in an efficient and original way.

Works Cited

AdobePhotoshop CS5. “Adobe Photoshop CS5: Puppet Warp Sneak Peek.” YouTube, 2010. Web.

Bloom, Susan R. Digital Painting in Photoshop. Waltham, MA: Focal Press, 2009. Print.

Fuller, Larry U., and Fuller, Robert C. Photoshop CS3 Bible. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2011. Print.

Wood, Alan B. The Graphic Designer’s digital toolkit: A Project-Based Introduction to Adobe Photoshop CS5, Illustrator CS5 and Indesign CS5. Stamford, CN: Cengage Learning, 2010. Print.

Introduction

In my opinion ours is a culture obsessed with the idea of perfect beauty; flawless skin, blemish free features, thin waistlines, striking eyes, perfect noses and not a pimple in sight yet such an obsession has been fueled by nothing more than lies and hypocrisy with popular culture icons using such lies to distort reality all for the sake of making money (Peterson, 1).

What I’m talking about is the sheer amount of altered, retouched and utterly fabricated photos that appear on today’s billboard ads, magazine covers and online advertisements with models appearing flawlessly beautiful, unnaturally thin and possessing skin tones that are so smooth and perfect that you would think that they were paintings.

Such beauty and elegance can be summed up in one word “Photoshop”; they aren’t real, no one has eyes that striking, no one has legs that flawless, people don’t glisten in natural light, they really aren’t that thin, and hair doesn’t normally shimmer that way as if they stepped straight out of a Palmolive commercial (Coen, 1).

It is fake, unnatural yet it has created an obsession with beauty and perfection that has dominated the fashion industry resulting in the proliferation of photoshopped imagery on almost every page of major fashion magazines around the world.

Why is Photoshop Extensively Used?

When examining the extent of photoshopping in today’s magazine and print ad industry it must be questioned as to why the practice was instituted in the first place. When examining models from the 1960s, 70s, and 80s it can clearly be seen that the women in the photos had fuller figures than the models of today.

Back then such models were considered the most beautiful women on the planet regardless of any slight imperfections seen on their skin or bodies. It was only by the mid 90s that the idea of beauty started to shift with models becoming skinnier and skinnier resulting in the almost skeletal like figures that we see today.

On the other hand it must be noted that from a historical perspective making people look better than they actually were has been around for quite literally hundreds of years. Paintings of historical figures such as Catherine the Great, Elizabeth the I, Henry the VIII and a plethora of such figures always portray the subjects in the painting as having flawless skin, imposing figures and beautiful proportions yet in reality such individuals had far from ideal visual appearances.

It is a well known fact that Elizabeth the I rarely took a bath, had terrible teeth and was not what one would consider “desirable” yet in her paintings she looks incredibly beautiful. The same goes for Henry the VIII who in reality was morbidly obese yet looks positively handsome and imposing in his portrait. It is based on this that it can be seen that there is a historical precedent for hiding a person’s true appearance for the sake of portraying a falsified image of beauty.

A rather interesting fact that should be taken into account regarding historical artists and their “editing” of their subject’s appearance is the fact that if they had painted the subjects as they actually were it would very likely get them fired or killed.

In the case of modern day photographers the use of extensive photoshopping in order to change the appearance of models can be likened to the actions of history’s artists in that their very survival depends on producing iconic images that show great symmetry and beauty despite the appearance of the models.

This is due to the fact that the magazines these photographers work for demand a certain quality in the images they produce. You must take into account that magazines not only have to sell themselves but the products that sponsor them.

As such in order to entice people to buy the magazine and the products they advertise they need models which look absolutely flawless, symmetric and uphold the standards of beauty that is up to date with current popular culture standards.

The message these magazines are trying to express is that “if you buy this product you will look like this” or “if you apply this and that your skin will look just as flawless”. It is a message based on lies that is force fed to the public which unfortunately has worked over the past decade as evidenced by more and more photographers having to use photoshopped images in order to comply with the falsified standards of “beauty” that fashion magazines demand.

What is Beauty in the Fashion Industry?

Today, the idea of beauty, as espoused by popular culture fashion magazines, consists of a thin waistline, small shoulders, a petite nose and well shaped lips. This perception of beauty has changed from the time in which full figured girls were considered beautiful and instead has been replaced by the present day ideal of a rail thin body, a pale complexion and long thin arms and legs (Stewart, 1).

It is rather interesting to note that such women, when examined through the eyes of someone from 16th, 17th, 18th and early 19th century, would have been considered ugly, sick or possibly starving due to a lack of food.

What must be understood is that the present day definition of beauty is not part of a set standard (aside from considering symmetry to be beautiful) rather throughout the years there have been various definitions of beauty ranging from hour glass figures, full figured women and even those who by today’s standards can be considered fat (Stewart, 1). All of these standards of beauty have been in one way or another influenced by the prevailing popular culture at the time.

It is only within the past decade due to the greater level of interconnectivity brought about by globalization and the internet that a set international standard for beauty has been created with thin models rather than full figured women being considered beautiful. At the present it is rare to find a photo in a fashion magazine where a model has not been cropped, thinned, smoothed, sharpened and otherwise warped into what the fashion industry considers “the ideal woman”.

This ideal though is completely false, these models are not that beautiful, not as thin and whose legs are not that smooth and shiny in real life. Women are being tricked by the millions into trying to fit into a false ideal (Coen, 1).

In fact within the past decade alone the number of plastic surgery procedures within the U.S. has increased by nearly 300% since the mid 1990s with cosmetic facelifts, Botox and collagen injections, liposuction, breast implants and nose reductions topping the list. In other words people that already look perfectly alright the way they are have become so obsessed with what they believe is the ideal form of beauty .

This results in them willingly spending thousands of dollars and weeks of recovery in order to conform to this image which in the end is not truly attainable. It is based on this that it can be stated that not only are photoshopped images of models a form false advertising but they have negative repercussions due to the obsession of the general public with popular culture.

This is due to the fact that popular culture plays an important role in defining what is beautiful and what is not and unfortunately it so happens that the present day definition is one akin to considering individuals that are rail thin and pale as being beautiful.

Influence of Popular Culture

The influence of popular culture on modern day society can be interpreted as a form of irrational exuberance which is defined as the act of people modeling their behavior on the actions of other people without sufficient justification for doing so. In the case of models seen in magazines and print ads people see these models, which pop culture defines as the epitome of beauty, and attempt to emulate them by buying the products that the magazines say can help you achieve the same level of flawlessness as them.

Yet this beauty is nothing more than a false image made to entice the masses towards buying a particular product however this doesn’t stop people from attempting to emulate them in whatever way they possibly can.

Evidence of this can easily be seen in either the Miss Earth, Miss World, Miss Universe and a variety of other local and regional beauty pageants where it is always the contestant that has a thin body rather than full figured look that wins.

Not only that, with the current proliferation of modern day media in the form of TV shows and movies which also show thin stars and actors this has furthered reinforced the message being presented by photoshopped model images in that in order to be considered beautiful you must try to emulate the model that the picture shows.

Conclusion

Based on this paper it can be seen that not only are photoshopped images a form of false advertisement but they actually contribute to the current popular culture perception that in order to be considered beautiful you need to be thin.

On the other hand the blame cannot be placed solely on photoshopped images alone but can also be attributed to the shifting nature of what is considered beautiful by present day popular culture standards. In fact what is considered beautiful today may not be the same standard 50 years from now as established by historical precedent.

Works Cited

Coen, J. “Why You Must See Unretouched Images, And Why You Must See Them Repeatedly.” Jezebel. N.p., 2010. Web.

Peterson, J. “How Photoshop Transformed Megan Fox.” Jezebel. N.p., 2010. Web.

Stewart, D. “Rachael Leigh Cook Wants Photoshop To Be A Crime.” Jezebel. N.p., 2010. Web.

Stewart, D. “An Analysis Of Crystal Renn’s Photoshop Of Horrors.” Jezebel. N.p., 2010. Web.