Category: Philosophy

https://epdf.pub/introduction-to-logic-and-critica…
HW 3
Exercise Set 5.5: Pro

https://epdf.pub/introduction-to-logic-and-critica…
HW 3
Exercise Set 5.5: Problems 1, 5, 11, 13
Exercise Set 5.6: Part Two: Problems 1, 3, 5, 7
Exercise Set 8.1: Problems 3, 9
Exercise Set 8.2: Part One: Problems 7, 9
Exercise Set 8.5: Problems 5, 7
Exercise Set 8.9 Part One: Problem 5(use either the truth table method or the short cut
method)
Exercise Set 8.9 Part Two: Problem 5 (use either the truth table method or the short cut
method)
Exercise Set 8.10: Problem 7d
H.W. #4 :
Exercise Set 9.1: Part Two: Problem 5; Part Three: Problem 7
Exercise Set 9.2: Problems 11, 15
Exercise Set 9.3: Part One: Problems 7; Part Two: Problems 5
Exercise Set 9.5: Problems 1. For set 9.5 you must also use rules of distribution
(introduced in lecture) to determine validity. If syllogism is invalid say which rule it
violates.
14 9.V – 9.VI Distribution Fallacies
9.VII – 9.IX Reduce & Reconstruct. Syllog.
15 HW Session 4 & Wrap Up Course eval

NOTE: You may ONLY submit a PDF and/or a MS Word doc.
The instructions are in th

NOTE: You may ONLY submit a PDF and/or a MS Word doc.
The instructions are in the document attached to this assignment.
There are two parts to this assignment:
Part A where you will map an argument
Part B where you will evaluate the argument you mapped.

please answer each question on the document I uploaded and it also has the links

please answer each question on the document I uploaded and it also has the links inside the document.

After we gain an understanding of an idea or argument, we are in the position to

After we gain an understanding of an idea or argument, we are in the position to think critically about it. That is, we can evaluate it for its truth. This second mini-paper is all about thinking critically about the idea or argument you described in your first mini-paper. The first step of this paper is thus to make sure you have a good understanding of the argument/idea from your first mini-paper. See the feedback you were given regarding your paper and revise it in light of the feedback given. Then, take the next step in evaluating the argument/idea. Do you think the argument is valid? That is, do the premises lead to the conclusion? Is it sound? That is, are the premises true? What about the conclusion or main idea? Is it true, i.e., does it accurately described or fit with reality? The main task of this second mini-paper is to ask these kinds of questions about the argument/idea that you wrote about in your first mini-paper.

Hello, I have provided the instructions below. Please let me know if you have an

Hello, I have provided the instructions below. Please let me know if you have any questions. NO RESEARCH REQUIRED.
This semester, we have examined computer, we have examined ethics – and along the way, we have examined many other topics – but we have not directly paid attention to the question of society. After all, it would seem that we can only understand the roles of computers and ethics in society if we first understand (or at least have some hypotheses about) society. To think philosophically (which I recommend!), we need to develop the mental habit of considering all of our ideas as provisional – that is, all of my ideas, even my most cherished (and/or clung to) beliefs are not facts, but proposals. Therefore, without getting too hung up about it, I can examine them – ruthlessly – without debilitating myself psychologically. Again, this is a mental discipline, and takes time and attention to develop. Everyone feels free to criticize the ideas and beliefs they don’t share – philosophy is the practice of criticizing all ideas equally (at least, as equally as possible, given the nature of our unconscious conditioning, privilege, biases, etc. – thus, the philosophical practice of self-examination, which continues throughout one’s life).
What is society? Or, who are they? What constitutes a society, what is its “nature,” as philosophers are wont to say? Is society the same thing as community, as populace, as people, as state, as nation, as territory (etc.)?
Depending on our answers to these questions, we can go on to ask: what is/are the role(s) of computers in society (as we have defined it)? What is the role of ethics in this relationship between computers and society? What ethical theories work best to describe and/or regulate this situation, which, by all accounts, is novel in human history? How novel is it really?

Social Influence in Social Psychology
According Kassin et al . (2021), “througho

Social Influence in Social Psychology
According Kassin et al . (2021), “throughout human history, writers, poets, philosophers, and personality theorists have portrayed the self as an enduring aspect of personality, as an invisible inner core that is stable over time and slow to change” (p. 99). They added that recently “social psychologists have focused on change . . . they have discovered that at least part of the self is malleable, molded by life experiences and varying from one situation to the next” (Kassin et al ., 2021, p. 99).
Instructions
Read chapters 1-5 of the textbook. Then, answer the following questions found in the APPLY Your Experience: Self-Presentation, MindTap section of Chapter 3:
Describe an experience when you worked hard to present yourself in a certain way. What identity were you trying to claim when you did that? How did you want others to see you? Who were those others? Do you think you would have acted differently if the “audience” had been one that you had a closer connection with?

Read each question—there may be more than one.
Post your responses in the appro

Read each question—there may be more than one.
Post your responses in the appropriate threads. Students are required to make their initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time). You should respond to two posts of your colleagues by 11:59 pm on Sunday night.
Responses should be of sufficient length with proper grammar.
Respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings with each question. Responses are due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time). You will lose marks if you do not satisfy the minimum number of posts. This feature will keep you engaged. Your response to your colleagues should be at least one full paragraph each (at least 4-5 sentences) for each post.
Review your postings to see who has responded to you.
Be sure to answer all questions.
Include a bibliography using APA format. If you do not include a bibliography utilizing at least two different sources, you will lose marks.
Document all your sources in the initial discussion post using APA format. Your initial post should look like a research paper where you document all your sources. For example, if you provide a definition of a principle, be sure to document your source in the sentence like this:
“Cooper, Heron, Heward (2020) outline the definition of positive reinforcement as….”
or
“The definition of positive reinforcement is…. (Cooper, Heron, Heward, 2020).”
Instructions
Explain the 4 branches of applied behavior analysis. (Task List A-4)
Briefly summarize the 4 branches of ABA. (Write at least 2 paragraphs)
Which branch of ABA interests you the most and why? (Write at least 1 paragraph)
Grading
Refer to the following Discussion Board rubric to see how you will be assessed.
Rubrics
Discussion Board Rubric
Criteria
Exceeds Standards
Meet Standards
Does Not Meet Standards
Criterion Score
Writing Competency: Grammatical structure, APA formatting
1 point
Exemplary spelling and grammar. Precise use of words with meaning clearly expressed. Feedback is supported by citing textual references from course materials in APA formatting.
0.5 points
Minor errors in grammar or format. Acceptable, effective use of words and expression.
0 points
Errors in grammar or format frequently obscure expression of thought. Ineffective wording, sentence structure, and expression.
Score of Writing Competency: Grammatical structure, APA formatting,
/ 1
Critical Thinking: Skills evident: knowledge, comprehension, application, synthesis, evaluation
1 point
Higher order thinking is clearly evident and presented in a clear logical flow. Insightful interpretation, application, explanation, and/or critique.
0.5 points
Some higher order thinking is evident. Organization is logical. Links need strengthening. Most ideas are clearly interpreted, applied, explained and/or critiqued.
0 points
Basic knowledge level information is presented. Organization is not evident. Interpretation, application, explanation and/or critique are not evident.
Score of Critical Thinking: Skills evident: knowledge, comprehension, application, synthesis, evaluation,
/ 1
Participation: Interacts in positive, constructive, timely manner (responses to colleagues)
1 point
Adds clear insights to ongoing discussion. Responds to a minimum of two others. Timely responses. Asks probing, constructive questions. Includes liberal and natural use of “encouraging statements.”
0.5 points
Contributes further thought to discussion in a timely way. Limited use of “encouraging statements.” Responds to two others.
0 points
Contribution is late and therefore not able to add to discussion. Respect of others is lacking. Does not respond to others.
Score of Participation: Interacts in positive, constructive, timely manner (responses to colleagues),
/ 1
TotalScore of Discussion Board Rubric,
/ 3
Overall Score
Exceeds Standards
2.25 points minimum
Meet Standards
0.75 points minimum
Does Not Meet Standards
0 points minimum

Write me 5 discussion posts for each topic here, 200-350 words for each one. mak

Write me 5 discussion posts for each topic here, 200-350 words for each one. make sure to thoroughly read the assigned reading for each one. . However, What I am looking for in the case of each of your submissions is a reasonable and honest effort informed by the reading(s). That is, don’t simply give me your opinions. Please give me the considered and sincere opinions you form only after looking at the pertinent readings and thinking about them in light of the discussion questions.)
I will include all of the necessary documents and links for the readings in a specific name pattern.
you can find all the the instructions in the instruction pdf

Write me 5 discussion posts for each topic here, 200-350 words for each one. mak

Write me 5 discussion posts for each topic here, 200-350 words for each one. make sure to thoroughly read the assigned reading for each one. . However, I leave the paragraph length up to your judgment. What I am looking for in the case of each of your submissions is a reasonable and honest effort informed by the reading(s). That is, don’t simply give me your opinions. Please give me the considered and sincere opinions you form only after looking at the pertinent readings and thinking about them in light of the discussion questions.)
I will include all of the necessary documents and links for the readings in a specific name pattern.
See the the full questions for each discussion attached on the file called: Phil Discussions. Also, I attached the the rquired readings.

https://epdf.pub/introduction-to-logic-and-critica…
H.W. #1:
Exercise Set 1.6:

https://epdf.pub/introduction-to-logic-and-critica…
H.W. #1:
Exercise Set 1.6: Problems 1, 3, 7
Exercise Set 2.1: Problem #14
Exercise Set 2.10: Part One: Problems 1, 5, 7, 11; Part Two: Problem 1
H.W. #2 :
Exercise Set 3.1: Problems 1, 3
Exercise Set 3.3: Part Three: Problems 1, 3
Exercise Set 3.4: Part Two: Problems 1, 7
Exercise Set 3.5: Problems 1, 3, 5, 7
Exercise Set 4.1: Part One: Problems 1, 3
Exercise Set 4.2: Part One: Problem 5
Exercise Set 4.8: Problems 7, 11, 13