Find an example of a fallacy used in popular advertising or any persuasive te

Find an example of a fallacy used in popular advertising or any persuasive te

Find an example of a fallacy used in popular advertising or any persuasive text. Upload the image/words or provide a link.
Identify the fallacy and why you think that this particular type of advertisement represents the fallacy that you have chosen.

Choose an advertisement on television, on the radio, on the Internet, or in prin

Choose an advertisement on television, on the radio, on the Internet, or in prin

Choose an advertisement on television, on the radio, on the Internet, or in print.
Describe, deconstruct, and analyze the advertisement by answering the following items:
Where did you find the advertisement ?
Briefly describe the scenario depicted in the advertisement.
What product is advertised?
Who is the audience for this advertisement? How do you know this?
Identify the main claim in the advertisement.
Is the claim credible? Why or why not? Use class terminology to explain.
What might make the claim more credible? What might make it less credible?
How does the author use rhetorical strategies to sell this product to its audience?
Does the advertisement reveal any cognitive biases? Which ones and how?
Your analysis must be at least 400 words in length and follow APA Style formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate.

Find a two-minute clip on any debate aired on the news in the last year. Provi

Find a two-minute clip on any debate aired on the news in the last year.
Provi

Find a two-minute clip on any debate aired on the news in the last year.
Provide a link to the clip and address the following:
What is the context of the argument being made?
Identify at least two or three rhetorical devices used during this debate and explain their effect on the audience. Do you think the speakers use these intentionally? If so, for what purpose? If not, explain your reasoning.

150 words Do animals deserve the same rights as human beings? Why or why not? 2.

150 words
Do animals deserve the same rights as human beings? Why or why not?
2.

150 words
Do animals deserve the same rights as human beings? Why or why not?
2. Imagine a robot so advanced that it looks, eats, breathes, thinks, exercises free will, and has emotions just like a human. Should the robot be considered a human? Why or why not?
3. Students may prepare their own questions for discussion

 1. Find an example from your life illustrating whether you agree or disagree wi

 1. Find an example from your life illustrating whether you agree or disagree wi

 1. Find an example from your life illustrating whether you agree or disagree with the Sophists: does rhetoric create a truth useful at the moment (kairos)? Use your second and/or third paragraphs to explain whom you side with: Callices, Socrates, Phaedrus, or Gorgias? Be clear, though. In 200-250 words, answer the prompt.  

   In 250 words, answer the following questions:  Think of an example from you

 
 In 250 words, answer the following questions: 
Think of an example from you

 
 In 250 words, answer the following questions: 
Think of an example from your life that addresses the following questions: is rhetoric more about explaining truths or about creating beauty? Can you articulate a beautiful untruth (i.e. a lie)? Can truths be beautiful or must they remain ugly? Have you ever shared an “ugly” truth? 
You must mention kairos, polis, or engage the ideas of the Sophists, Gorgias, Protagoras, and/or Aspasia discussed in class from the Herrick textbook. Write your answer in the form of a narrative. Don’t tell me. Show me. 
 Double space and use paragraphs. 

Correctly cite sources in written work. Write with correct sentence structure, g

Correctly cite sources in written work. Write with correct sentence structure, g

Correctly cite sources in written work. Write with correct sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Project presents a philosophical argument in epistemology, ethics, or metaphysics.  1000 words)
  
I

 After reading all of Chapter 6 of book Doing Ethics, please write a short, obje

 After reading all of Chapter 6 of book Doing Ethics, please write a short, obje

 After reading all of Chapter 6 of book Doing Ethics, please write a short, objective summary of 250 which summarizes the main ideas being put forward by the author in this selection of the document “Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals” by Immanuel Kant (starting on page 146)

canno figure out the venn diagram so I need help with the following syllogism is

canno figure out the venn diagram so I need help with the following syllogism is

canno figure out the venn diagram so I need help with the following syllogism is invalid using a Venn diagram: All T-Rexes are carnivores. John is a carnivore. Therefore, John is a T-Rex 

FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a 1000-1500 word response 

FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a 1000-1500 word response 

FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a 1000-1500 word response in which you address EACH of the following points IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What is the author’s main argument? 2) How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)? 3) Do you agree or disagree with him? 4) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of at least two of the readings we have studied in this course (in chapters 1-9) to your analysis. Make sure to give a substantive explanation of how the philosophers’ insights are relevant to the topic you are discussing.