Causes of Failing of Persuasion Attempts: Analytical Essay

“With reference to social psychological theory and research, explain why persuasion attempts often fail.”

Persuasion can be defined as “the process by which a person’s attitudes or behaviour are, without duress, influenced by communications from other people” (‘Persuasion | psychology’, 2020). Attitudes and behaviours can be changed in both positive and negative ways with the most critical factors of effective persuasion being; the message, the source, the target and the method. There are also a variety of theories that attempt to explain why persuasion attempts fail. This essay will aim to outline and evaluate the barriers to persuasion, which can include, reactance, counterarguing, attitudinal inoculation and avoidance.

Avoidance:

Avoidance as a form of resistance to persuasion suggests that people may protect themselves from the effects of persuasion by directly ignoring or filtering out counterarguments. This process of selective avoidance allows people to completely disregard advertisements, messages and political protests that do not align with their pre-existing beliefs, this then allows them to focus primarily on information that is consistent with their attitudes (Sutton & Douglas, 2020). This may suggest that avoidance and cognitive dissonance are linked, this is because, by ignoring counterarguments, the discomfort found in contradictory information is reduced (Festinger, 1957). One study on smoking found that smokers paid more attention to articles that stated smoking isn’t that impactful on their health than articles centred around the detrimental impacts whilst the opposite was found for non-smokers (Brock and Balloun, 1967). It important to acknowledge that selective exposure is more common in those with stronger opinions and thus it is not an explanation for all types of persuasion failure.

Counterarguing:

The concept of counterarguing suggests that those who are capable of offering an alternate argument to the message being presented to them are more likely to be able to resist attempts of persuasion (Sutton & Douglas, n.d.). Individuals can use counterarguing to undermine the message, the source, or the persuasive techniques being used. One of the most common forms of counterarguing is to contest the content being presented, this is done by people reflecting on the information in the message and subsequently creating counterarguments that highlight the discrepancies and faults with the content (Wright, 1973). Furthermore, counterarguing is more effective when there has been forewarning and people have the opportunity to consider and construct strong responses, thus, the more time people have between the warning and the more likely they are to resist attempts at persuasion (Chen H et al, 1992). It is also important to recognise that counterarguing is stronger when the message is inconsistent with pre-existing attitudes. When participants were asked to either “pro-life” or “pro-choice” messages, they reported having more opposing thoughts to the argument that did not match their beliefs, and more supportive thoughts towards attitude consistent arguments (Eagly et al, 2000).

Attitude inoculation:

An alternative explanation for why persuasion attempts fail is attitude inoculation. Attitude inoculation suggests that by people over coming weak counter attitudinal arguments, they become more capable of resisting stronger and more complex persuasive attempts. McGuire (1964) proposed that the attitude inoculation process mirrors the medical inoculation theory, in that, weakened strains of viruses can be injected into the body in order to have a beneficial impact on our immune systems by making us much more resistant, and even immune, to such viruses later on. Similarly, in attitude inoculation we can become more resistant to future, and more complex, persuasions by being exposed to weaker counterarguments that trigger us to develop our defences and become more competent in regard to counterarguing. The inoculation theory was driven from prior research surrounding one-sided and two-sided messages. The suggestion was that one-sided messages are supportive messages that aim to strengthen pre-existing attitudes whereas two-sided messages present counterargument and refutation of counterarguments (Lumsdaine & Janis, 1953). From this research McGuire (1964) developed the inoculation model has two primary steps, threat and refutational pre-emption, thus a conventional inoculation message starts with a http://europepmc.org/article/med/26903925

Conclusion:

  1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536373/#B92
  2. Brock T. C., Balloun J. L. (1967). Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 6, 413–428. 10.1037/h0021225
  3. Persuasion | psychology. (2020). Retrieved 26 October 2020, from https://www.britannica.com/science/persuasion-psychology
  4. Sutton, R., & Douglas, K. Social psychology (2nd ed., p. 273).
  5. Sutton, R., & Douglas, K. Social psychology (2nd ed., p. 274).
  6. Woltman J. L. C. M., Wedel M., Pieters R. G. M. (2003). Why do consumers stop viewing television commercials? Two experiments on the influence of moment-to-moment entertainment and information value. J. Mark. Res. 40, 437–453. 10.1509/jmkr.40.4.437.19393
  7. Festinger L., Maccoby N. (1964). On resistance to persuasive communications. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 68, 359. 10.1037/h0049073
  8. Wright P., Friestad M., Boush D. M. (2005). The development of marketplace persuasion knowledge in children, adolescents, and young adults. J. Public Policy Mark. 24, 222–233. 10.1509/jppm.2005.24.2.222
  9. Chen H. C., Reardon R., Rea C., Moore D. J. (1992). Forewarning of content and involvement: consequences for persuasion and resistance to persuasion. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 28, 523–541. 10.1016/0022-1031(92)90044-K
  10. Eagly, A.H., Kulesa, P, Brannon, L.A, Shaw, K, & Hutson-Comeaux, S (2000). Why counterattitudinal messages are as memorable as proattitudinal messages: The importance of active defence attack. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1392-408
  11. McGuire W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: some contemporary approaches, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 1, ed Berkowitz L. (New York, NY: Academic Press; ), 191–229
  12. Lumsdaine, A. A., & Janis, I. L. (1953). Resistance to ‘counterpropaganda’ produced by one-sided and two-sided ‘propaganda’ presentations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 17, 311–318.

Reflection on Ethical Persuasion: Analytical Essay

It’s not so much about crossing a line; it’s about your true intentions. The difference between negative and positive manipulation is not necessarily whether it’s covert, or whether it attempts to change a belief, it’s about ethics. If you can be relatively sure you’re going against a core belief, or something you’re prospect would not want, it’s not ethical. If you would not want it done to you, it’s probably not ethical. If it causes harm to your prospect, it’s probably not ethical. If you have to threaten or force someone to accomplish your goal, it’s coercion and it’s definitely unethical.

You can use the art of persuasion and manipulation without being two-faced and deceptive. There’s nothing wrong with wanting it all. You deserve what you want, and you can have it, but you must remember that if you’re entitled to what you want, so is everyone around you. You must use your powers for good and not diminish anyone else’s pursuit for happiness. Respect the others around you, and respect the art. You’ll experience a greater sense of accomplishment and pride.

Knowledge of these basic concepts isn’t hard, but people are largely unaware of them, or aware of them on a subconscious level only. Learning the art of influence and how to apply these techniques puts you ahead of the crowd. With this information, you have a tool kit to use in any interaction you have. You’ll be able to manage the interaction with confidence and authority, and communicate your intentions and expectations clearly. Then all you have left is to watch the situation play out as you desire.

It may be true that there are individuals, businesses, politicians, and leaders out there who conduct underhanded, dirty, mean business. They use knowledge and tools in harmful ways. But that doesn’t mean all businesses run that way, and it doesn’t mean you have to conduct yourself like that.

When it comes to guiding and inspiring other professionals, knowing a thing or two about positive manipulation makes all the difference. Keynote speakers take the stage to inspire sales teams. Trainers and coaches hold students accountable for reaching the goals they’ve set. Whether to inspire a sales team, a singer, an actor, an athlete, a parent, or a student with important exams, coaches are always working with the patterns of thought and behavior exhibited by their clients.

Tony Robbins is a very well-known American author and life coach who regularly hosts or speaks at seminars which cater to a wide variety of individuals. The audience is often comprised of business professionals, entrepreneurs, and other driven individuals wanting to accelerate their success and develop themselves on a professional or personal level. Not only does Tony Robbins attest to deliberately using persuasive language and communication on himself, and within business and social situations, he teaches others how to do the same. He speaks on the theory, the how-to, and the virtues and results of a lifestyle augmented by the ability to read individuals and communicate persuasively.

There are thinking habits and behavioral habits that we all have that may no longer be serving us well. For example, a thought-pattern of overthinking, stressing needlessly, or self-criticizing may have been born from an initial need or purpose, but the behavior has persisted and rather than serve as a help, it has devolved into a harmful behavior. Similarly, physical behaviors can be the same. Smoking, perhaps, was taken up initially as a means of coping with stress. That may have been a beneficial (or at least available) mechanism of coping at the time. As time goes by though, the habit of lighting a cigarette and smoking it to feel relief from stress is not as effective, and the drawbacks to smoking are more noticeable as a pattern that is no longer serving you well.

Robbins, along with many other coaches and speakers on a local or national scale, teach individuals how to use manipulative language and action on themselves to replace these negative patterns with positive ones. But it’s not only about adjusting behavioral patterns. Learning the art of persuasion allows you to command an audience with confidence. It allows you to say just the right, impressive, thing at the right time to that romantic or financial prospect. It allows you to move more freely through a host of social situations you’ll inevitably find yourself in at some point, or regularly.

For coaches that guide sales teams and entertainers, teaching others to project themselves deliberately is one of the primary functions. So much of what we do is a psychological game more than anything else. No matter if you speak to a king, a saint, or degenerate, the inherent senses that manipulation plays upon is an equalizer. We are all human. We all want for safety, food, and shelter. We all desire to be of value and to be loved. We all strive for self-actualization. Persuasion acknowledges this and utilizes it to elicit a particular response from the individual or the public. The desired response comes as a result of the harmony between the language of the body and actual language.

When an individual says one thing, but their body says another, the audience picks up on this, either consciously or subconsciously. Impressions, opinions, and even decisions are made based on this information. If the visual or physical doesn’t seem to match the verbal, we instinctively recognize that something is amiss.

A professional that distinctly adheres to the philosophies of deliberate body language and actual language would be attorneys and lawyers, especially trial lawyers. Trial lawyers routinely represent clients in significant court cases, arguing in their client’s support and defense. Without a doubt, this requires a keen sense of how one conducts himself in the courtroom. It requires a deliberate intention to build a conscious and subconscious rapport with the jury and judge. A trial lawyer must also guide the client in deliberate body language and deliberate speech for the best possible results in the trial.

Persuasion is used to build a rapport with the judge and jury. It’s important to be able to read the body language of the jury in the initial stages. It provides insight to the lawyer about which areas of the trial or the story need more attention, emphasis, or avoidance. The way a juror might cross their arms, rest their elbow, or the micro-expressions on their face, all provide an indication into the mental and emotional workings of that individual at the time. In addition to reading the body language of individual jurors, the lawyer must to his or her best to broadcast themselves as sure, confident, and authoritative. This is not done by facts and words alone, but by the way in which one carries him or herself, the way in which one conducts him or herself on the courtroom floor. The way they breathe, the way they walk and stand, the way they sit and write, all of these factors will be weighed by the jury either consciously or subconsciously.

Persuasion is used to build the case, as well. Words are selected carefully. The order of those words is predetermined. While some information is deliberately put on display, other information may be deliberately downplayed or avoided to construct a story that puts the client in a good light. Facts, evidence, and alibis are all presented with intentions in mind and persuasion at hand. The lawyer assesses the jury and makes determinations about how to tell the story and the perfect timing to reveal or conceal information. The lawyer changes the tone, cadence, volume, timbre, and register of voice during certain points throughout the trial, to add influence and persuasion.

Persuasion is used in a number of ways throughout a trial. A lawyer might play “memory games” with a witness to discredit them. If a lawyer is trying to demonstrate what kind of character someone has, a meaningless social media post or email might be taken out of context and inflated to sway the jury.

Witnesses and those who testify in court are subject to heavy amounts of manipulation through speculation and emotional baiting. Lawyers must possess a working knowledge of human behavior and persuasive communication in order to lead a trial one way or the other for best results.

Without the skills to read the body language and expressions of the jury, the judge, the witness, and the opposing party, and the client, the lawyer would have little control over persuading the jury. Without these skills, the lawyer would not be able to best serve the client in defending his or her rights. Persuasion and manipulation is a necessary tool for this profession.

If it’s easy to see manipulation is a part of the law profession, it should be similarly easy to see that the world of politics is regulated by persuasion and manipulation; arguably even more so. Part of the power and magic of persuasive communication, especially in today’s world, is that it doesn’t always matter whether the communication contains truth and facts. What really matters is how others react to it emotionally. This is true of politics, and law.

In the business world, the role of a negotiator is to ensure that maximum value is felt by the counterparts. To achieve this, negotiators must read, interpret, and communicate in a deliberate and tactful way. In most cases, a rapport has been developed and it’s at this sometimes stressful point that the relationship is most fragile. The wrong phrasing or timing, and the rapport which has been built, could collapse. The negotiation could go south and result in an indefinite delay or a withdrawal of interest. To avoid this, negotiators employ a series of persuasive tactics to maintain the interest of the counterparts and to demonstrate high value. For instance, one of the primary methods of persuasion is to actually listen to what your prospect is saying, both in their language and in their body. If you listen carefully, instead of just waiting for your next chance to say something brilliant, you’ll actually pick up on clues and tidbits of information that you can use later with your prospect to persuade them.

An example of this might be a sales professional trying to close his or her biggest sale yet. In an attempt to demonstrate value to the prospect, the sales professional prepares a list of all the major features and functionality that will surely impress the prospect. However, when the sales professional listens to the prospect closely and carefully, it becomes clear that the prospect is only concerned about one major aspect: customer service. The prospect doesn’t care how many bells and whistles are included or how new and fast the technology is. What really matters is whether or not the customer service team will be responsive and really support them. The sales professional could play this one of two ways. If he or she has listened carefully, they’ll know the list of features and functionality they’ve prepared is virtually useless. The prospect just wants to trust that the sales professional will be responsive and supportive. This is the aspect the skilled sales negotiator will focus on. If the professional has not listened carefully, he or she will still probably try to dazzle the prospect with the features list, but will ultimately lose the interest of the prospect instead.

Another fundamental skill of a well-trained negotiator is to come prepared. The list of features and functionality? Create it and bring it anyway, even if you don’t use it. If you’re headed to a job interview, it’s a smart move to do your homework first. Look up the company’s website online. Get familiar with it. What’s the pricing structure or services provided? What topics were recently covered in the company blog? Check out the About and Contact Us pages to get a sense for who works within the company, how it was founded, and what mission the company is dedicated to. Having this information as you go into your interview will be infinitely more helpful than not. Sure, there is something to be said for winging it, but that’s like breaking the rules. Good rule breakers only break the rules after they learn them.

Excellent negotiators are ready to play poker and walk away if that’s what it takes to persuade the prospect. The negotiator plays the part of someone cool, calm, and collected. Straight-faced and only letting deliberate expressions slip. When the first offer is made, the negotiator doesn’t take it. This skilled manipulator is ready with a clear idea in mind about what the best-possible deal might be and what would be a dealbreaker. This professional doesn’t flinch one way or the other if the first offer is good or bad, and he or she isn’t afraid to walk away from the offer if some basic standards aren’t met. If you’re going into a job interview, it’s a smart idea to have in mind a salary you expect, a best-case salary, a worst-case salary, and what factors would make you decline the deal. If you go into the interview with these mental benchmarks, it will be easier to remain calm when the negotiations get heated. Without them, you may make an impulsive decision based on emotion that may not be the best deal you could get if you’d play it cool and put on a poker face.

Whether on a local level or a national scale, leaders find themselves in need of this same set of skills used by so many others, in order to influence and persuade their followers. Community leaders, spiritual leaders, and professors use these same practices to engage their audiences. In many cases, these leaders aim to inspire, educate, and call to action those in their communities and organizations. Without the understanding of basic body language, the leader would not be able to gain as much valuable insight as they could about their followers. Without the understanding of body language communication, the leader may not give off the right impression. How one stands, walks, breathes, and speaks are all indications of whether the individual is a confident and reliable authority or not. Eckhart Tolle would not be the spiritual teacher he is today if he spoke with anxiety and self-doubt. Martin Luther King Jr. may not have influenced entire generations of people had he not the understanding of effective, persuasive communication. U.S. President, John F. Kennedy, and his speech about going to the moon before the end of the 60s would not be such a permanent mark in our history if it weren’t for his impeccable sense of timing, and again, very persuasive communication. Presidential speeches are often groomed to fit a certain rhythm and cadence, with small digestible words, and a repetitive beat, in order for it to be the most effective communication possible.

One individual who fully understood the importance of communication from the body and from the mouth was King Leonidas, the Spartan military leader who famously defended the Greeks from the large-scale Persian attack of Xerxes at the Gates of Thermopylae with only 300 men in 480 BC.

Throughout his life, this well-respected leader knew how to command a group of individuals physically and verbally. His Spartan army was among the most well-trained and aggressive. The discipline and dedication of each Spartan soldier was remarkable and held in highest regard. Leonidas would not be able to accomplish this control and management of the Greeks and his army if it were not for a distinct understanding of human nature, and how to manipulate behavior with communication.

When Leonidas was asked if he would die to stop the Persians, he made it clear that his pride was not in dying to stop the Persians, but in dying to save the Greeks. When leaders asked Leonidas why he was taking so few troops to defend the Gates from the Persians, he displayed brazen confidence and told the leaders it was already too many for the task at hand. When his troops complained that the Persian army fired so many arrows it blocked out the sunlight, Leonidas used persuasive reframing and told his troops it would be nice to fight in the shade. When the Spartan troops were worried about the Persian army gaining on them, he told his men, yes the enemy is close to us, but this means we are close to them.

At one point, Xerxes, leader of the Persian army sent a messenger with a letter to Leonidas. Xerxes employed his own variety of manipulation. He offered for Leonidas and his men to join his Persian army and in return, Xerxes would allow Leonidas to be ruler over all of Greece. This attempted influence over Leonidas did not work. Instead, he returned a bit of manipulation himself, antagonizing Xerxes to attack. Xerxes had held held off the attack, waiting days. Xerxes had banked on the sheer number of his army manipulating the Greeks into retreat and surrender. Xerxes also thought that the intimidation of his army face to face with Leonidas’ men would wear them down over a matter of days and mentally stress them out. Though tactful, Xerxes influence was not great enough for the Spartan leader and his troops. When Xerxes next wrote to Leonidas ordering he hand over all weapons, Leonidas wrote back: “Come and get them”. Both leaders were utilizing the skills of persuasion. On one another, toward their own armies, and toward their citizens and leaders.

Coaches, speakers, lawyers, politicians, and negotiators are only a few of the fine professions to make fundamental use of persuasion. The success that these individuals experience can be the success you experience from your own application of these tools. Next, let’s take a look at more of these tools to help you on your path to achievement.

Difference between Persuasion Styles Across Cultures: Analytical Essay

Summary

This literature review aims is to inform the reader on how persuasion is present in every cultures, how it differs and above all how it is used. Persuasion is a fundamental part of communication.

Introduction

Persuasion occurs daily and has a massive influence on people lives. Universally it is recognized as a potent weapon, able to condition other people to achieve their goals. In ancient Greece, it was called ‘ars oratoria’, or the art of communication. Today is a tool widely used by the media (newspapers, televisions, social networks) to change ideas and behaviour to the general public.

Definition of persuasion

A process by which a single person or an audience of people is induced to take specific actions or think about certain thoughts that would otherwise not be the fruit of their own will.

Definition of culture

The culture is based on three main components: Values, norms, beliefs, present for a long (centuries) period in a specific group of people. All these components have been grafted into the social fabric and have become one with the group. A merger took place.

Persuasion falls within the subset of these components present in the social fabric and differs from culture to culture.

How does this process takes place

It is a real figurative process with effective methods/mechanisms used; everything is finalized to ’embrace’ the interlocutor towards the point of view of the person with whom the interaction takes place (person, media…). The central figure of the communicator tries to induce other people to change their thoughts/behaviours through the transmission of a message. Apparently this process takes place at a conscious, logical level. Actually such messages condition the unconscious mind. These messages make change ideas to the human mind, emotions (the real protagonists of the unconscious mind) and attitude. Since these messages arrive directly into the unconscious mind, the interlocutors are convinced that they act autonomously, spontaneously, but in reality, they are influenced by external factors.

The process of persuasion can be explicit or finer, sneaky when performed subliminally.

Thus described, persuasion can look unethical; may seem to be the description of coercion.

What is the difference between persuasion and coercion?

Coercion is a type of social influence aimed at changing the weights and behaviours of others by using subtle and deceptive schemes and methods, which can also lead to both psychological and physical abuse. Persuasion occurs through an exchange of ideas. In this exchange, the tools used are words and body language. Everything is aimed at putting the interlocutor in a specific mood that the persuader seeks to.

Persuasion has always been present in human social exchanges and is connected to the culture of belonging of a person or a group.

Based on Edward T. Hall’s theory, it is essential to understand in depth the culture of the interlocutor to avoid misunderstandings. Without this knowledge and empathy, there is the risk of making the interlocutor feel coerced.

Particular attention must be paid to this, first of all as human beings and above all as international business managers. Globalization is a fact and cultures are increasingly interconnected, so this knowledge is indispensable.

This knowledge can be deepened through the following theories:

Edward T. Hall’s Cultural Iceberg Model

The tip of the iceberg represents the visible and most superficial aspects of a culture. These are codified and unambiguous rules that can be easily described: language, laws, clothes, food, music, rituals. Below the surface, there are less objective aspects that can create misunderstandings in intercultural communication. They have unexpressed rules, that became conscious only when they are broken, such as, e.g. traditions, perception of time, variability in the use of greetings, courtesy, and other sociolinguistic aspects. More in-depth there are values that are deeply rooted within a society, and that determine behaviours and preferences (what is right or wrong, desirable or undesirable, acceptable or unacceptable).These are: social conventions, not communication verbal, human space and interpersonal distance. They are rules followed automatically but of which they are not aware and therefore are not easily recognizable by an inexperienced observer.

Cialdini Theory Persuasion

The psychologist Robert Cialdini, identified six persuasion strategy:

The authority. There is an attitude of reverence, devotion to the authorities. The decisions taken by the authorities are not called into question, even if some behaviours are not fair or moral.

Reciprocity. Happens when someone receives something and feels almost obliged to reciprocate what he has received. This ‘unwritten’ rule of returning something is a rule that, if not respected, the person is labelled ‘ungrateful’ or ‘parasite’.

The social proof. When so many people act, it is recognized as socially adequate. As a result of this, when the approval takes place by authoritative people, it leads to greater trust in the community.

Sympathy occurs when there are particular similarities between individuals. We like those who are like us, with common connection elements.

Scarcity or trend. Individuals tend not to appreciate what is abundant and to overestimate, what is scarce. Articles, people, scarce opportunities become more attractive to human eyes.

Commitment and consistency. Unsatisfactory people in maintaining a particular goal are labelled as irresponsible. Keeping one’s image coherent with the interlocutor has a tranquillizing function.

Hofstede Theory

Individualist societies are aimed at achieving personal goals. The primary value is that of individual autonomy with weak ties between individuals. The principle of independence of the individual with respect to the organization is emphasized; therefore the possibility of having time to dedicate to one’s personal life and to carry out work that is also gratifying on a personal. In collectivist societies, the primary value is instead belonging to the group and social well-being is placed before the well-being of the individual. So there is much more attention to the possibilities of training, the conditions of the working environment and one’s own abilities.

Johnstone, Lustig and Koester’s Theory

This theory, conceived by Lustig and Koester (2010) and Johnstone (1989) exposes three persuasion styles: quasilogical, presentational and analogical.

In the first style, the principles of formal logic are used, through objective evidence and evidence related to the conclusion. The most used terms are: so, therefore. Deductive reasoning is created, without shadows or grey areas. The second style makes use of emotions. The language is used to obtain an emotional response. All five senses are part of this style. What wins is the intense way in which ideas are exposed. A sort of hypnosis occurs.

In the analogical style, persuasion occurs through an analogy or a parable, intending to teach something. The speaker seeks to empathize with the public. Persuasion occurs through the sharing of experiences rather than in the thoughts themselves.

Persuasion in African culture

This research has as its object the reaction of the Nigerians (West Africa) to the six principles of Cialdini:

The results show that the most attractive strategies are the commitment, authority, reciprocity and sympathy, while consensus and scarcity are the least attractive strategies. The male population is more sensitive to commitment and authority than women. In some areas of the continent, superstition is part of the social fabric, assuming a crucial persuasive role. Some examples are:

In Rwanda, goats are found in all the farms, but also on the menus of most local restaurants. However, there is a belief that eating goat meat makes women grow beards.

In some villages in Kenya, the population believes that geese can recognize the presence of witches.

In Uganda, former hospital patients are encouraged to step on an egg to get rid of the disease permanently.

Persuasion in Western culture

Western culture is often characterized by individualism and low power distance, based on Hofstede Theory.

In individualistic cultures, the preferred pronoun is ‘I’ and the unique traits of a person are emphasized. People socialize among themselves, always keeping a distance. These aspects are found in persuasion processes such as attitudes, slogans to self-evolution and personal goals. In this perspective, ‘low-context’ communication, i.e. information sharing, is direct. Examples are United Kingdom and United States. For example, advertisements that focus on the product or the brand itself, without a social context, are preferred within individualistic cultures.

In these cultures, there is a kind of rational persuasion, focused on achieving the tasks to be performed. Moreover, in the Western world, the power distance is low; therefore, citizens can question authority and are less persuaded by an authoritative figure.

Western culture persuasion is, based on Johnstone Theory, a Quasilogical Persuasion. Logic is used to convey the message, supported by objective evidence, as undeniable — all backed by examples, logical connections, witnesses to facts and quotes from experts.

Persuasion in Asian culture

Asian cultures, Russia, China have a high degree of power distance, based on Hofstede Theory. They recognize the broad power of the authorities over the people. Authority means government, police and experts. In these cultures, one is recognized as more persuasive if one is an expert in the field, or if one is a leader.

Furthermore, they are collectivist cultures; the pronoun used is ‘we’. Persuasion is based on the benefit obtained by the group and not by the individual. The type of communication is indirect and requires attention to the emotions and implicit messages involved in the exchange. Based on Johnstone Theory, Eastern countries, including the Arab world, tend to use persuasive strategies of ‘presentation’ and ‘analogy’ Persuasiveness occurs through a targeted choice of words, combining phrases and rhythm. The style used is a narrative that allows connecting stories and information/past and present. The fundamental point is to use history and tradition as a precedent, using common cultural reference points.

Conclusion

Persuasion is a fundamental part of people lives, thinking and behaviuors. A good manager needs to understand that and need to be ready in order to develop appropriate management strategies across different cultures, always with mutual respect.

Ways and Strategies of Persuasion: Analytical Essay

Persuasion is seen in everywhere in all over the world. You find it on computers, social media, and on television. Persuasion starts from the minute a human being born. It is a tool used to persuade others in order to get the things you want. It is aimed to change others idea or behaviour toward some events or ideas. According to Perloff (2003), persuasion can be defined as ‘…a symbolic process in which communicators try to convince other people to change their attitudes or behaviours regarding an issue through the transmission of a message in an atmosphere of free choice.’

Persuasion is not new; it starts in the fourth century BC in Ancient Greece. It has a long history. Sometimes such behaviour plays a significant role in persuasion than of what we say. It is started from the minute we are born. Persuasion can be seen at personal and public levels. On one hand, we start by giving examples from the personal levels. People use different strategies to convince others. For example, my little sister always convinces her elder sister to buy her Ice-cream. She convinces her sister by two means, either by crying or by cheating. Another example is that, some children persuade their fathers to give them more money to go out with their friends and having dinner together. They use different ways, sometimes, they cry to get more money and sometimes, they use some kind words to get what they want. Another example, some people use logic to convince others. For instance, one of my friends convince me to buy a new car. I was hesitated to choose between two cars. He used logic to convince me. He said, this car has many specifications. It can go very fast and it is very convenience. He said it has screens so, you can also play videos on it. He added it has GPS. The result is that he convinced me to buy it because he used logic and facts to persuade me. On the other hand, when it comes to the public levels. We can see persuasion in the court of law, advertisement and election campaign. For example, lawyers use the skill of persuasion to convince the judge that their clients are innocent. Some advertisers use commercial advertisements as a tool to persuade others to buy a certain product. Some political nominees try to persuade people to get more votes. Interviews are also persuasion. The applicant is trying to convince the interviewer that he is a good nominee to get the job. Spring (2011) in his e-book “Advertising in the Age of Persuasion” said that, “In the twenty-first century, American brands and the use of persuasive information in business, diplomacy, and politics spanned the globe as nations increasingly became enmeshed in the American consumer economy” .Persuasion is not limited by what we say. It is also influenced by gestures, sound, and movement. Sometimes, the way you use your language to persuade others is more important of what you say. So, persuasion is used for many reasons. It may be used to convince someone to accept thought or a view. It may be also used to other things. Politicians usually use persuasive language to get their listeners consent with their ideas or views on a specific subject.

Persuasion is not restricted to a specific language. It is used in all languages. It was used in Latin and Greek languages. People of Rome and Greek were familiar with persuasion. It was used in adversarial law and political campaigning. The art of rhetoric is found not only in the English cultures but also in other cultures such as India. People of India had the skill of rhetoric before it was practised in Greek and Rome. The most significant work that we would never think of is the art of rhetoric written by Aristotle. The art of rhetoric is used in English language. People use different strategies to convince the audience. There are three different strategies. The first one is using reasoned proof. If the appeal is to reasoned proof, we call it as logos. Logos is used to convince the audience of your perspective. The second one is appealing to emotions. If the appeal is to the emotions, we call it as pathos. Pathos is used to convince the audience using effective emptions. The last one is using the good reputation of someone. If the appeal is to the good reputation of someone, we call it as ethos. Ethos is used to convince the audience of a good ethical personality. “In Aristotle’s art of persuasion, the term ethos (in Greek, character) designates the image of self-built by the orator in his speech in order to exert an influence on his audience” (Amossy,2001). An example of reasoned proof is that, a doctor wants to convince other doctors that a particular injection is very good for cancer patients. He said I injected many patients and the result is that, most of the patients live good life and years without the disease returning. The injection does not have any impact on their bodies. The doctor uses reason proof (Logos). An example of emotional appeal is that, some societies use emotional appeal (pathos) to convince others to pay money for the poor people. They use photos of the poor people to get them some money or shelters. An example of the good reputation is that, some advertisers use the reputation of a famous player to make advertising to a particular product to convince others buy that product. There are many rhetorical figures and devices in persuasion. These devices are usually used by successful speakers. The first device is rhetorical question which means when someone ask a question, he or she does not anticipate an answer. They either answer the question themselves, or the answer is clear. The second device is repetition. Repetition means when someone repeat something to emphasize on something. For example, the British Prime Minster Johnson uses repetition in his first speech as a prime minister. He said, “we will do a new deal, a better deal.” Here he repeats the word “deal”. Another repetition that he used the word “my job” like here “my job is to make your streets safer; my job is to protect you and my job is to make sure your kids get a superb education”. The third device is a rhetorical triplet. Rhetorical triplets are expressions of related thought in a group of three leading to climax. For example, Johnson used rhetorical triplet in his speech. As he said, “ ”. The fourth device is the verbatim repetition. It means when someone repeats the same word. “Verbatim is defined as an exact repetition without changing the words” (LoveToKnow Corp 2018). For example, in Johnson’s speech “The time has come to act, to take decisions, to give strong leadership and to change this country for the better”. The fifth device is contrastive device which means using two opposite things at the same time. Politicians use contrastive device as a way to convince the audience. As Johnson said in his speech that, “And though I am today building a great team of men and women”. The two opposite words are men and women. Johnson is also used reasoned proof (logos) to convince the British People. He said “let’s develop the blight-resistant crops that will feed the world”.” Let’s change the tax rules to provide extra incentives to invest in capital and research”.

In conclusion, this research has discussed the different ways that people used to convince others. It also discussed the strategies in persuasion. Persuasion is a very effective way to get what you like. It is all over the world and in every phase. Some people have the ability to persuade others by the way they talk. Persuasion plays a very significant role in our life. Everyone can use his or her own persuasive language. Everyone has its distinctive way to persuade others.

Essay on Propaganda Vs Persuasion

It has often been claimed that public relations practice borders on persuasion and blatant propaganda. Is public relations the same as propaganda? Please discuss the role of persuasion and propaganda in PR using theory and practical examples to support your argument.

The UK Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR, 2012, originally formed as the Institute of Public Relations in 1948) provides the following definition: Public relations is about reputation – the result of what you do, what you say, and what others say about you. Public relations is the discipline that looks after reputation, earns understanding and support, and influences opinion and behavior. It is the planned and sustained effort to establish and maintain goodwill and mutual understanding between an organization and its public. (Copley, 2014)

The definition clearly states that public relations is a practice used for managing reputation, it is a direct or indirect communication bridge between a subject and its target audience. The main goal is influence meant to be achieved by presenting information using creative expression and campaigns, designed to enhance the impact of information.

The key word is ‘Presentation’ not manipulation of individual opinions.

Edward Bernays, regarded as the father of modern public relations, was a great proponent of propaganda as he described the process as manufacturing consent or getting people to do what you wanted them to. He and his supporters saw propaganda being used as a communication tool for social control. In model terms, it is one-way symmetric without the need for feedback. (Franklin, 2009)

As the media industry is getting bigger and more varied, the lines between traditional practices and the ethics involved are getting blurred. Public relations overall allows reputation management to be altered in ways that could seem similar to propaganda but there are intricate differences between both practices that can be understood clearly by analyzing the breakdown given below,

One of the Key differentiating factors between Public relations and Propaganda to be considered is that PR is a two-way communication method, which means the agency’s professional practitioners and the organization’s client form ideas by communicating within the management and with the target audience (Public) to carry forward a campaign whereas propaganda is usually a one-way communication practice which focuses on spreading the ideas instead of garnering feedback or insights from the public. Leaving no space for inputs by the decided target audience.

Another differing factor is that PR relies on facts to create further decisions. Honest, research-backed communication takes place to gain the desired outcome while propaganda doesn’t necessarily consider the truth to create open dialogues, misleading information carried forward to reach a certain agenda is the main goal. Another major difference between public relations and propaganda is that the information disseminated as part of public relations activities is almost always based on research and is accurate.

Propaganda and PR can be viewed as similar in many ways, as they both aim to create ideas and influence public opinion, using the mainstream media, and targeting specific audiences. The result of both is to get people to act. But despite the similarity in their objectives, the methods to achieve them are contrasting in nature which might seem like the same thing to the vast majority of the public. The most important difference as discussed remains the truth of the messages. Propaganda uses prejudice, half-truths, and misinformation. PR uses facts, which can be tested. It relies on logic and sometimes emotions to disseminate information between an organization or an individual and its community. The use of proven facts is important when filing a journalist or sending a media report, as incorrect information can affect your credibility with journalists.

A key factor in both practices is Persuasion. Persuading the opinions, ideologies, and behavior of a set demographic, the public is manipulated into believing a certain thing and behaving a certain way. The impact created by influencing people’s outlook on specific things is what both, PR and propaganda aim to do. But what does persuasion mean?

Persuasion has to do with cognition and the active assessment of the content of a particular message. As a microprocessor of socialization, it involves changing minds, opinions, and attitudes about causality and affect (identity) in the absence of overt material or mental coercion. Or, in Perloff’s words, persuasion is an ‘activity or process in which a communicator attempts to induce a change in the belief, attitude, or behavior of another person or group of persons through the transmission of a message in a context in which the persuadee has some degree of free choice'(Perloff 1993:14).1It can lead to common knowledge, or ‘epistemic conventions’ (that may or may not be cooperative), or it can lead to a homogenization of interests. (Johnston, 2000)

Persuasion. When thought of, can resemble either good or bad. This process enables people to try to influence others to change their behavior or attitudes into what they want them to be. It will use every symbol It can to appeal to the masses, including pictures, sounds, words, and so on. But Influence will always be deliberate and not by accident.

In the end, the decision power remains with the individual, but it heavily relies on the intelligently altered information and ideas put forward cohesively. It does not involve coercion, but a proposal.

Persuasion regarding either public relations or propaganda boils down to the very idea of putting the desired campaign in the forefront and aligning the opposing opinions or the feedback loop in a descending trajectory. In attempts to do so, an organization can achieve a state of misleading or manipulated information that seems like the only truth for the public to believe in.

The factor that differentiates a successful PR campaign from a propaganda strategy is its purpose, which comes down to the eternal debate about good versus bad.

If the purpose is financial, organizational, capital, or social gain putting the said subject in a good light is acceptable as a PR practice, when it starts blurring the lines between telling the public something and commanding the same thing as if it is the only truth to attain power and control, it starts becoming propaganda. Anything that goes beyond a mutual interest and starts benefitting a personal interest or shared interest of only a few affecting most people can be termed as Propaganda instead of a ‘Public relations strategy’.

Considering the case of India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his rise to power and prominence in the largest democracy of the world, it is relevant to understand how a political party can establish a PR strategy and then develop that into widespread propaganda to overthrow a government and garner the support of more than a billion Indians, based on their collective religious beliefs to go on to becoming Quite possibly one of the greatest world leaders.

This study aims at analyzing how a political party manipulated, curated, and persuaded billions of people into believing in an agenda using the following propaganda and persuasion techniques,

1. Computational Propaganda

Howard and Woolley have theorized that three main elements – political bots, organized trolling campaigns of hate and harassment, and the online semination of ‘fake news’ and disinformation – form a broader system of computational propaganda, an ‘assemblage of social media platforms, autonomous agents, and big data tasked with the manipulation of public opinion’ (Woolley and Howard, 2019)

By providing misleading information, deceptive descriptions of events, and deceitful characterization of opponents and outgroups, illegitimate1 social media accounts depict a ‘reality’ that is not factual2, but that has the potential to generate real consequences (Bisbiglia, 2019; Rodny-Gumede, 2018; Siddiqui, Svrluga, 2016).

Motivated by this potential threat, in recent years numerous scholars have investigated this pernicious form of political indoctrination – referred to as computational propaganda (Nerino, 2021)

Due to the rise in accessibility of social media, and control over the majority of the other media outlets in the country, his party was able to form a hard-hitting storyline that resonates with the people of India. The story of a poor child born in a village in a state where the great Mahatma Gandhi was from, struggling with poverty. The media emphasized how he overcame the difficulties by selling tea as a young adult to earn money honestly and provide for his family. The ‘honest’, ‘hard-working’, and ‘common man’ coming from rags to riches by doing good in his community was something every person in this developing nation could relate to. (Strong and Killingsworth, 2011)

The narrative was publicized by the press, as a great inspiration for the youth to look up to and by default believe in what the man has to offer in terms of beliefs, agendas, and policies because the media made it seem like this ‘chaiwala’ (English translation – Tea vendor) is one of them, someone who made it by the sheer perseverance and belief in his hindu, religious upbringing. This laid the foundation for the unabashed trust people must have in him because he is not an outsider but someone who is the right heir to the power he has garnered. So, everything he proclaimed henceforward was to be taken as the absolute truth, and the narrative made it possible with great conviction. (Singh, 2021)

2. Flag waving Two Way Symmetrical Technique

The power of national symbols to rouse impassioned emotion and behavior has been noted by scholars from a variety of disciplines including sociologists (Mills, 1961), anthropologists (Firth, 1989), political scientists (Laswell, 1935), historians (Curti, 1946) and psychologists (Kelman, 1969). Many of these accounts suggest that individuals’ ties to national symbols often supersede their ties to the group that the symbols represent. The crux of these assertions is that expressions of national sentiment are directed toward national symbols rather than the nation itself and that such symbolism is infused with unique psychological meaning and political import. (Schatz and Lavine, 2007)

There is wide recognition that national symbols are a potent source of political power and influence, capable of rallying support for state interests by evoking emotional expressions of national identification, allegiance, and self-sacrifice.

One of the main reasons why a mass audience can be influenced by propaganda is the ability to agree on the same beliefs and ideologies. India is a largely Hindu-dominant country, the regional name for the country is ‘Hindustan’ (Land of the Hindus) by exploiting the nomenclature, his party unified his target public as one (Hindus). This enabled the followers as well as the non-followers to believe in one common thing, that they belonged to the same community. Irrespective of their financial, geographical, or societal standings, every Indian could get behind the ideology of being a part of something larger than themselves, because they felt included. This in turn created a community of people that involved the majority of the country on one side of the spectrum led by the visionary Hindu man sharing the same ideologies and principles as them. Of course, this created a backlash from the other parts of the country, but the resistance was negligible in front of the massive, shared vision of making India a Hindu nation.

The propaganda was able to achieve this by making it seem like every person who shared this interest was part of the communication and not a unilateral governance. This form of communal adherence made the wave of Modi resurge into the most successful propaganda victory. Something that seemed impressive in Public communication was a narrative-driven, shared interest agenda to bring one particular party into power that would benefit only a certain section of society.