Need to add on the following on the already written paper Component Typing Use 1

Need to add on the following on the already written paper
Component Typing Use 1

Need to add on the following on the already written paper
Component Typing Use 12 pt Font;
Health Policy, Legal, and Ethical Issues Identify the patient population, and the sociocultural aspects of the condition. Identify any local, state, or federal laws, ethical issues or policies surrounding the condition/project idea. Investigate and describe any health policies that may surround APRN licensing and/or prescribing
Identify recent, relevant Treatment and management of Diabetic foot ulcer, include pharmacological treatment of the chosen condition.
Please also ensure that the following requirements are included
Times New Roman Only Text Style APA 7th ed.
Format Elements of the Manuscriipt
The contents of the capstone project should consist of 20+ pages.
This requirement does not include preliminary pages, references, and the appendices.
You should use not less than 15 sources which should be included in the reference list.
Preliminary Pages Title Page Required, not numbered
Affirmation Signature Page Required, not numbered;
pages following are numbered using lowercase Roman Numerals Abstract Required Table of Contents Required

Criminal psychology can be defined as a branch of applied psychology concerned w

Criminal psychology can be defined as a branch of applied psychology concerned w

Criminal psychology can be defined as a branch of applied psychology concerned with the collection, examination, and presentation of evidence for judicial purposes. The role of a psychologist in criminal investigations can take a variety of forms. For example, there are criminal psychologists specifically involved in assessing and making treatment commendations or trial and sentencing. The area of psychology and law continues to grow rapidly.
Laws help resolve conflict, protect the public, and are established for public safety. As a society, we have established procedures to help control behaviors that may pose a risk for others or violate others’ rights. According to the course textbook, rules of etiquette help us deal with conflict between one person’s impulses and another person’s rights. Two distinct models, both with varying perspectives and characteristics, guide the criminal justice system. These models represent two philosophical approaches toward why certain choices are made within the legal system.
Using the South University Online Library or the Internet, conduct research on criminal psychology and models of criminal justice. {Visiting the American Psychological Association (APA) or American Psychological–Law Society are good resources for your research, as well}.
Based on your research and understanding, address the following:
Explore and describe various aspects of the role of a psychologist in the legal system.
Categorize and describe four careers related to the field of psychology and the law. Explain some of the ethical issues encountered by each of these four careers you identified.
Classify the roles and duties of a forensic psychologist and summarize how ethics play a role in the field of forensic psychology.
Analyze and discuss four specific reasons on why we have laws.
Analyze what is meant by the psychological approach to studying the law.
Describe the two models of the criminal justice system and characterize each from the perspective of its values and focus. Compare these two models with respect to morality and legality.
Analyze and explain the two schools of thought that guide the judicial decision-making process.
Compare these schools of thought, citing at least three similarities and three differences between the two. Discuss how judges and attorneys use them in legal practice.
Submission Details:
Post your response to the Discussion Area by the due date assigned. Respond to at least two posts by the end of the week.

comparing and contrasting any two Roman artifacts, structures, or sites relevant

comparing and contrasting any two Roman artifacts, structures, or sites relevant

comparing and contrasting any two Roman artifacts, structures, or sites relevant to the archaeology of Rome. The “artifacts” must have been produced between the era of Regal Rome and the era of Constantine I.
Descriiption of the first artifact, Descriiption of the second artifact, Critical comparison of the two artifacts, Composition.
Papers should use the American Anthropology Association standard for in-text citation.
• Place citations in parentheses and include the author’s name and the source’s year of publication, with no intervening punctuation, at the end of a sentence or before a comma or semicolon, whenever possible: (Herzfeld, 2005).
• Always include page numbers for quotations or extensive paraphrases, using an en dash for page ranges: (Herzfeld, 2005: 146–47).
• Use semicolons to separate two or more references in a single parenthetical citation and list them alphabetically: (Bessire & Bond, 2014; Comaroff, 1996; Daser, 2014; Foucault, 2000).
• Use the first author’s last name and et al. for works with three or more authors.

Please add on to the attachment. Identify an audience that would be interested

Please add on to the attachment.
Identify an audience that would be interested

Please add on to the attachment.
Identify an audience that would be interested in your event and an answer to your historical research question. Keep that audience in mind as you write your initial thesis statement as part of this assignment. Also describe primary and secondary sources you could use to research your historical event.
Previous assignment attached.

1. Source Identification The introduction of this paper will be introducing the

1. Source Identification
The introduction of this paper will be introducing the

1. Source Identification
The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:
❒ Have you recapped your research paper’s central argument?
❒ Have you provided the author’s name?
❒ Have you provided the source title?
❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?
❒ Have you ended the introduction with a thesis statement that sums up your evaluation of the source’s credibility and usefulness?
2. Source Evaluation
❒ Have you provided an evaluation on the source’s credibility in at least one full paragraph?
❒ Have you used specific, accurate page/paragraph-numbered examples from the source to illustrate your evaluation on credibility?
❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source’s usefulness in at least one full paragraph?
❒ Have you used at least two specific quotations (cited with accurate page/paragraph-numbers) from the source to illustrate your evaluation of its usefulness?
❒ Did you include a reference list with complete source data such as author(s)’ name(s), date of publication, title, publication outlet or journal, an URL address (if available)?
The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: After you recap your research paper’s central argument argument, provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)
You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:
Credibility (at least one full paragraph): Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness.
Usefulness (at least one full paragraph): Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?
Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.
This is the source you will use.
Lavric, M. (2020, September). The power of authoritative parenting: A cross-national study of effects of exposure to different parenting styles on life satisfaction [Review of The power of authoritative parenting: A cross-national study of effects of exposure to different parenting styles on life satisfaction]. Science Direct.
Links are a sample of what the work should look like and what my essay is about.

Section 1: Scholarly Article – Complete the following for Section 1 of your pape

Section 1: Scholarly Article – Complete the following for Section 1 of your pape

Section 1: Scholarly Article – Complete the following for Section 1 of your paper:
Find a scholarly article about personality tests being utilized in the workplace.
Write at least a one (1) page summary of the article.
Describe the personality test being used and describe how it could be used/applied in an organizational setting.
Make sure to use proper APA citations.
Section 2: Your Reaction – Complete the following for each personality test:
Provide a brief summary of the personality test results.
Describe the various areas of results you received for both tests
Explain whether or not you find the results to be accurate.
Do not just write, “I agree with the results”. Discuss why you agree or do not agree.
Are there some aspects you agree with and others you don’t? Why?
After reflecting on your results, do you feel that using personality tests would add value to the workplace?
This section should be at least one (1) page in length.

Week 1 Project- Barriers and Solutions to Evidence-Based Public Health There are

Week 1 Project- Barriers and Solutions to Evidence-Based Public Health There are

Week 1 Project- Barriers and Solutions to Evidence-Based Public Health There are 9 potential barriers and solutions to EBPH. Name 4 barriers and each one’s solution. Consider the types of evidence and the context of public health evidence (challenges, i.e. surveillance, community engagement, etc.) Submissions Details: Write a 3 to 4 page paper in APA format