Submission Record Extenuating circumstances Ensure you are familiar with the

Submission Record
Extenuating circumstances
Ensure you are familiar with the

Submission Record
Extenuating circumstances
Ensure you are familiar with the process for submitting a claim for extenuating circumstances. If you experience any extenuating circumstances that may have affected your ability to attempt or submit the present assignment, please follow the relevant instructions on the VLE in order to submit your claim for extenuating circumstance prior to your submission deadline.

Week 8 Case Study –Neurological Problems George is a 59-year-old lawyer who pre

Week 8 Case Study –Neurological Problems
George is a 59-year-old lawyer who pre

Week 8 Case Study –Neurological Problems
George is a 59-year-old lawyer who presents to the emergency room with weakness and numbness of his right side that began while playing golf this morning. George says he had an unusual headache when he first woke up, but he was looking forward to golf and the headache was not bad enough to prevent him from golfing. While on the golf course, George suddenly had an episode of weakness. After this weakness, George realized he could not move his right side, could not speak, fell off his seat in the golf cart, and could not get up. George’s friends called 911 to bring him to the emergency room. This episode with neurological deficits has lasted longer than 1 hour and persists while the patient is in the emergency room. George has a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus type 2, and 30-pack-years of smoking.
Case Questions
1. What should the initial history and physical examination include? (make a list of the interventions that would be performed on examination of this patient)
2. What are the differential diagnoses for this patient?
3. What is the most likely diagnosis for this patient? Explain your answer.
4. What treatments will be used for the initial management of the patient’s condition?
5. What factors are contraindications for thrombolytic therapy?
6. What are the goals in stroke management?
Discussion Board Rubric
Grading Elements
2
1
0
Initial Post Requirements
Post by due date at 2359 CST. This is respectful behavior to allow fellow students in the course time to read your initial post and formulate a highly synthesized response and meet the reply post due date/time.
Posted one day late at 2359 CST.
Posted two days late at 2359.
Initial Post Content
Demonstrates synthesis of issues/content presented for the discussion week by significantly contributing to the quality of discerning ideas, and/or provides insightful interpretations and analyses of the content presented for the week, and/or stimulates further discussion by providing a new perspective.
Demonstrates in depth understanding of issues/content presented for the discussion week by providing a summary of the content presented for the week.
Demonstrates minimal understanding of issues/content presented for the discussion week by providing a brief answer to the discussion board question.
Initial Post Support
Provides support for discussions with at least 2 current scholarly references, one of which may include the assigned text. Uses APA 7th edition format for citations and referenceswithin last 5 years.
Provides support for discussions with at least 1 current scholarly references, one of which may include the assigned texts. Uses APA 7thedition format for citations and references within last 5 years.
NO support.
Initial Peer Response Requirements
Posted by due date at 2359 CST.
Posted one day late at 2359 CST.
Posted two days late at 2359 CST.
Initial Peer Response Content
Significantly adds to the discussion demonstrated by synthesizing key elements and adds further analysis of peer’s post. Respectfully adds a different perspective/critique of the peer’s post for healthy debate of the content presented for the week. Uses scholarly references in APA 7th edition format where applicable.
Adds to the discussion with in depth summary of key elements of peer’s post and highlights key elements of the post. Does not add a new perspective/critique. Uses scholarly references in APA 7thedition format where applicable.
Provides only a brief summary of peer’s post.
Spelling/Grammar/APA
Less than 10spelling/grammar/APA errors.
Less than 15spelling/grammar/APA errors
More than 15spelling/grammar/APA errors
Follow-up to peer responses (purpose is to maintain some dialogue on the topic during the week)
Significant response to either peer or faculty with referencing optional but the post needs to continue adding new perspective/critique to maintain open discussion of topic.Uses scholarly references in APA 7thedition format where applicable.
Response to peer is a summary with no new perspective/critique. Uses scholarly references in APA 7thedition format where applicable.

Write an initial post of 200–250 words addressing the discussion prompts. Then r

Write an initial post of 200–250 words addressing the discussion prompts. Then r

Write an initial post of 200–250 words addressing the discussion prompts. Then respond to at least two of your peers’ posts. Each response needs to be a minimum of 100 words.
Discussion PromptsHow do nurses affect the quality of healthcare?
How does health literacy influence health disparity?
Choose one QSEN competency that you have noted in the clinical setting. Then describe the situation and how the competency was being met.

This week you will be reflecting on key health determinants and the use of resea

This week you will be reflecting on key health determinants and the use of resea

This week you will be reflecting on key health determinants and the use of research and evidence-based practice which may impact the development of population health measures and policy initiatives. The article by Cook et al. (2014) titled, Support for smoke free multi-unit housing policies among racially and ethnically diverse, low income seniors in South Florida, is a prime example on key stakeholders setting an agenda, conducting a survey (research study), and facilitating change. Please address the following questions based on your analysis and understanding of the article:
Who are the stakeholders?
Based on your analysis of the literature review embedded in the study, do you think the authors do a good job in framing a policy change?
Do you think this policy change has potential implications at other locations/facilities? If so, how?
What do you think are next steps in this program of research and policy?
Reference:
Cook, N. J., Hollar, L., Chavez, S., Quinn, D. L., Phillips, T., DeLucca, M., & Corrales, L. (2014). Support for smoke-free multi unit housing policies among racially and ethnically diverse, low-income seniors in south florida. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 29(4), 405-415.

please do the CJP on a make shift patient, you can make it up. But please includ

please do the CJP on a make shift patient, you can make it up. But please includ

please do the CJP on a make shift patient, you can make it up. But please include that she is a pregnant patient at 32 weeks who is experiencing contractions. She will be admitted to the Labor and delivery unit at hollywood Presbyterian hospital on tuesday july 30th. please let me know if you have any questions. I provided the template please fill it all out.

For your signature assignment, compose a 3- to 4-page case analysis (in addition

For your signature assignment, compose a 3- to 4-page case analysis (in addition

For your signature assignment, compose a 3- to 4-page case analysis (in addition to a title page, abstract, and reference list page) written in APA Style citing at least 3 references with one non-Internet reference. The following should be covered in the paper:
Title Page: Case Title, Full Name, Section, Date, Instructor, and Campus
Abstract: Summarize the case o One non-indented paragraph on a separate page. This will be page 2.
Introduction: The physiological importance of the liver, pancreas, and kidneys for the proper functioning of the human body
Body: Response to the prompts: Organize your analysis with headings that thoroughly answer the prompts (e.g., “Abnormal Glucose Levels” for question 1).
Explain each prompt in depth with physiological concepts and provide sufficient evidence from the literature for each prompt. o Include normal physiological ranges (if it applies).
Maintain the order of questions when answering.
Conclusion: Summarize the paper in a paragraph.
Support your opinions with evidence from your readings and research. Review the rubric for complete grading criteria.
Case: End-Stage Kidney Disease
Cynthia, a 53-year-old female presented to the emergency room due to feeling constantly tired, hungry, thirsty, and with frequent urination. Her past medical history is significant for cirrhosis and end-stage kidney disease. Physical examination had revealed yellowish discoloration to the skin, multiple bruises, bilateral edema, and weakness lasting more than three weeks. Laboratory tests were ordered (results provided below) after which she was prescribed metformin and informed to contact a doctor if she starts experiencing nausea, vomiting, fast breathing, and/or lethargy, as metformin has been known to cause metabolic acidosis.
Complete Blood Count (CBC)
Sodium 126 mEq/L
Glucose 220 mmol/L
Calcium 7.1 mg/dl
Red blood cell count 3.9 cells/ul
Iron 40 mcg/dL
Albumin 2.5 g/dl
Vitals
Blood pressure 92/64 mmHg
Hormone Panel
Renin Low
ADH Elevated
Aldosterone Low
Vitamins
Vit D Low
Vit K Low
Vit E Low
Vit A Low
Urine and Stool Sample
Stool color Gray
Stool content Increase fat content
Urine color Clear
Complete Blood Count (CBC)
Glucose Present
It has to APA format and also essay format. Each question shouldnt be numbered it should have a title.

Module 06 Content Click here to open a word document with the assignment instruc

Module 06 Content
Click here to open a word document with the assignment instruc

Module 06 Content
Click here to open a word document with the assignment instructions and rubricSubmit your completed assignment by following the directions linked below. Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates..Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. (Mac users, please remember to append the “.docx” extension to the filename.) The name of the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an underscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and the date. An example is shown below:

Description Written communication in nursing incorporates the use of evidence or

Description
Written communication in nursing incorporates the use of evidence or

Description
Written communication in nursing incorporates the use of evidence or research published in the literature from scholarly references. Scholarly references are defined as work that is peer-reviewed and published in a professional journal. Using published research to support the viewpoint of nursing, especially in cases being made for change, will enhance the argument.
An annotated bibliography is a list of resources you anticipate using to support your argument. Developing an annotated bibliography will help you organize your research. To create a purposeful annotated bibliography, the following information should be included: the specific citation, a brief summary or paragraph about the article, and how it pertains to your research question.
Assignment Details
This is a 3-step project:
Identify a change.
Find 6 articles.
Write an annotated bibliography for each article.
Please read the detailed instructions below carefully.
Step 1: Write 3–4 sentences answering the following questions:
Identify and describe a recent change that occurred in your workplace. It could be a change in the levels of staffing; a change in policy, such as time off or tuition reimbursement; a change in use of equipment or supplies; a change in charting or computerized medical records; and so on. Describe the change in 3-4 sentences.
1 of the sentences should address the rationale for the change.
Step 2: Begin researching scholarly articles from the library from the past 5 years that are related to the change issue identified in Step 1.
Complete a 6-column table of the references you found, including the following: Author(s) last name, first initial.
(Year).
Title of article.
Title of Publication,
Volume #(Issue #),
Pages of the article.
A minimum of 6 scholarly references are needed to complete this assignment; you may find more.
EXAMPLE
Change Issue: Low Census Staffing Policy
Currently, when the patient census is low, staff go home based on tenure; the same staff are continually going home, resulting in a lower paycheck for these nurses. The proposed change is to rotate all staff to leave when the census is low, regardless of tenure, so the burden of potentially lower pay is shared among the entire staff and not the same few.
Author Last Name, First, Initial.
(Year).
Title of Article.
Title of Publication,
Volume #
(Issue #),
Pages.
Step 3: This step requires the development of an annotated bibliography for each of the 6 articles listed in Step 2. This step should be 6 paragraphs total (1 for each article that is summarized and analyzed) and approximately 450–700 words in 2–3 double-spaced pages.
Consider the following:
Summarize the main points for each of the 6 references (must be from within the last 5 years) from Step 2, each in its own paragraph.
Use the MEAL method of writing, where each paragraph contains a minimum of 4 sentences: M = Main point
E = Example and/or Evidence (citation)
A = Analysis—refers to what was significant about the article and how the article was related to the change topic you selected. Be sure to include at least 1 analysis sentence about each reference in that paragraph.
L = Link or transition to the main topic
Remember to cite each article appropriately (Author(s) Last Name, Year) and include an APA formatted reference page.
Please click on this APA Style for CTU Students link for help with APA formatting. Use the CTU Writing Style Guide (templates provided)—not the Introductory Writing Style Guide.
Please submit your assignment.
For assistance with your assignment, please use your textbook and all course resources.
Individual Project Rubric
The Individual Project (IP) Grading Rubric is a scoring tool that represents the performance expectations for the IP. This Individual Project Grading Rubric is divided into components that provide a clear description of what should be included within each component of the IP. It’s the roadmap that can help you in the development of your IP. Individual Project Grading Rubric