read every pdf the instructions is there and when you done respond to one studen
read every pdf the instructions is there and when you done respond to one student
https://www.euromedinfo.eu/doing-a-family-assessme…
read every pdf the instructions is there and when you done respond to one studen
read every pdf the instructions is there and when you done respond to one student
https://www.euromedinfo.eu/doing-a-family-assessme…
A theoretical framework provides a rationale for predictions about the relations
A theoretical framework provides a rationale for predictions about the relationship among variables. Discuss the variables you will use in your change project and the specific steps that are necessary to implement your change project in your organization.
****Attached are the files that have been completed related to this project as well as resources .***
create a comprehensive patient needs assessment of 4-5 pages
See the document n
create a comprehensive patient needs assessment of 4-5 pages
See the document named assessment 1 for instructions and all information needed.
Attachment named cf_Exemplar is an example of what the final course work should look like.
post 1: What methods can nurses use to actively influence health policies and le
post 1: What methods can nurses use to actively influence health policies and legislation?
Post 2: Discuss the controversy regarding childhood immunization and the potential affect on community health.
APA 7th ed format include 2 in-text citation 4 years or more recent for each post.
APA format, at least 3 references no more than 5 years,and a speaker note.
The f
APA format, at least 3 references no more than 5 years,and a speaker note.
The first paper was about Hurricane in Florida
Qualitative Evidence research paper
the young adult suicide pdf will be the prim
Qualitative Evidence research paper
the young adult suicide pdf will be the primary evidence use for the paper.the other articles are there to support your paper.
please read Writing Assignment #2: Appraise the Qualitative Evidence
Review the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global health agenda and select one
Review the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global health agenda and select one global health issue to focus on for this Assignment.
Select at least one additional country to compare to the U.S. for this Assignment.
Reflect on how the global health issue you selected is approached in the U.S. and in the additional country you selected.
Review and download the Global Health Comparison Matrix provided in the Resources.
The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Global Health Comparison Matrix; 1-page Plan for Social Change)
Part 1: Global Health Comparison Matrix
Focusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following:
Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study.
Explain the strengths and weaknesses of each policy.
Explain how the social determinants of health may impact the global health issue you selected. Be specific and provide examples.
Using the WHO’s Organization’s global health agenda as well as the results of your own research, analyze how each country’s government addresses cost, quality, and access to the global health issue selected.
Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the health of the global population. Be specific and provide examples.
Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the role of the nurse in each country.
Explain how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries. Be specific and provide examples.
Identify
the professional code of ethics for your professional specialty or a
sp
Identify
the professional code of ethics for your professional specialty or a
specialty that you are interested in, describe the decision criteria,
and analyze each theory using examples and the Ethical Theory Matrix
Template
Ethics is a branch of philosophy devoted to the study of morality.
Ethics has a long history of theories about determining right from wrong
and identifying the principles of living a good life. For this
assessment, you will be asked to apply foundational principles in
ethics, such as autonomy and justice, in a relevant health care setting.
Each profession within health care has its own code of ethical
behavior designed to help individuals within that profession to make
sound ethical choices in carrying out the tasks and practices particular
to their professional role. It may be useful to locate one or more
relevant codes of ethics for your current or desired career path. This
research will be beneficial to your professional development, and you
will have a chance to apply it to the Tonya’s Case: Ethics and
Professional Codes assessment in this course.
These are broad-ranging topics, which, if taken alone, seem almost
comically simple. Of course, rational people of legal age should be able
to make decisions concerning themselves and their minor children. Of
course, medical professionals should be honest with patients, and, of
course, patients should be honest with members of their health care
teams. Of course, one’s medical issues should be kept private. But
rarely are things as simple as they seem. Take some time to scratch
beneath the surface, and we encounter myriad ethical dilemmas.
Honesty tends to be a revered trait in many cultures. However, many
people admit to lying occasionally, especially if the intent is to spare
someone pain, embarrassment, or anguish. Is lying to someone because of
love, concern, or reputation ever ethical?
Privacy and confidentiality are also important concepts. But are
there limits? Can the greater good ever outweigh the rights of
individuals?
And at what point can others, whether an individual or an entity such
as a government body, ethically determine someone’s actions, fate, or
choices? Fluoridated water, smoking regulations, compulsory K–12
education, and speed limits are only a few examples of how we, as a
society, agree to limited personal freedoms because these things are
good for us.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your
proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment
scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Articulate ethical issues in health care.
Articulate the time-tested theories of ethics.
Describe the strengths and weaknesses of the time-tested theories of ethics.
Competency 4: Explain the conceptual framework that health care leaders use to make ethical decisions.
Identify the decision criteria of the time-tested theories of ethics.
As you begin work on your Ethical Theories Matrix assessment, it may
be helpful to review the suggested resources focused on moral and
ethical considerations. For your own reference, you may want to briefly
jot down your thoughts related to:
An inventory of the basic principles of health care ethics. These
principles are nonmaleficence, beneficence, utility, distributive
justice, and autonomy.
An explanation of each principle as well as your own example to illustrate the application of each.
Drawing from the material covered in the resources as well as your own research, complete this assessment using the attachment below
For each theory, first describe the decision criteria. The decision
criteria are the instructions the theory gives for how to reach the
morally correct choice in a situation that requires action.
Then, provide your own example of how someone might act using the decision criteria of the theory.
Finally, briefly describe the strengths and weaknesses of each
theory using the last two columns of the Ethical Theory Matrix Template.
The suggested resources for this assessment could help you get a
start on completing the matrix, but do not hesitate to use any outside
resources that you can find online, the Capella library, or elsewhere.This matrix is a tool you will use throughout the rest of the course.
Submit your completed matrix as an attachment to this assessment.Refer to the Matrix of Ethical Theories Scoring Guide for more information on how this assessment will be graded.
Instructions
It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the
Instructions
It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum word requirement but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments unless specified in the instructions. All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format.Instructions:
Review week five’s discussion feedback from faculty and peers. Using the workflow chosen and created in week five, determine the T.I.G.E.R.’s initiatives which correlate with the selected workflow.
Explain how the evaluation of the workflow will be determined.
What type of information would need to be gathered to be used to evaluate the workflow’s implementation and effectiveness?
Identify at least two type of evaluation methods.
Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria.
Develop
an intervention (your capstone project), as a solution to the patient,
Develop
an intervention (your capstone project), as a solution to the patient,
family, or population problem you’ve defined. Submit the proposed
intervention to the faculty for review and approval. This solution needs
to be implemented (shared) with your patient, family, or group. You are
not to share your intervention with your patient, family, or group or
move on to Assessment 5 before your faculty reviews/approves the
solution you submit in Assessment 4. In a separate written deliverable,
write a 5–7 page analysis of your intervention.
In your first three assessments, you applied new knowledge
and insight gleaned from the literature, from organizational data, and
from direct consultation with the patient, family, or group (and perhaps
with subject matter and industry experts) to your assessment of the
problem. You’ve examined the problem from the perspectives of
leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, policy,
quality of care, patient safety, costs to the system and individual,
technology, care coordination, and community resources. Now it’s time to
turn your attention to proposing an intervention (your capstone
project), as a solution to the problem.
In this assessment, you’ll develop an intervention as a
solution to the health problem you’ve defined. To prepare for the
assessment, think about an appropriate intervention, based on your work
in the preceding assessments, that will produce tangible, measurable
results for the patient, family, or group. In addition, you might
consider using a root cause analysis to explore the underlying reasons
for a problem and as the basis for developing and implementing an action
plan to address the problem. Some appropriate interventions include the
following:
Creating an educational brochure.
Producing an educational voice-over PowerPoint presentation or video focusing on your topic.
Creating a teaching plan for your patient, family, or group.
Recommending work process or workflow changes addressing your topic.
Plan to spend at least 3 direct practicum hours working with the same patient, family, or group.
In addition, you may wish to complete the following:
Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to
ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete and
how it will be assessed.
Conduct sufficient research of the scholarly and
professional literature to inform your work and meet scholarly
expectations for supporting evidence.
Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s Writing Support page.
Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) develop an
intervention as a solution to the problem and (b) submit your proposed
intervention, with a written analysis, to your faculty for review and
approval.
Part 1
Develop an intervention, as a solution to the problem, based
on your assessment and supported by data and scholarly, evidence-based
sources.
Incorporate relevant aspects of the following considerations that shaped your understanding of the problem:
Leadership.
Collaboration.
Communication.
Change management.
Policy.
Quality of care.
Patient safety.
Costs to the system and individual.
Technology.
Care coordination.
Community resources.
Part 2
Submit your proposed intervention to your faculty for review and approval.
In a separate written deliverable, write a 5–7 page analysis of your intervention.
Summarize the patient, family, or population problem.
Explain why you selected this problem as the focus of your project.
Explain why the problem is relevant to your professional practice and to the patient, family, or group.
In addition, address the requirements outlined below. These
requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria for this
assessment, so be sure to address each main point. Read the
performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work
will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for
document format and length and for supporting evidence.
Define the role of leadership and change management in addressing the problem.
Explain how leadership and change management strategies influenced the development of your proposed intervention.
Explain how nursing ethics informed the development of your proposed intervention.
Include a copy of the intervention/solution/professional product.
Propose strategies for communicating and collaborating
with the patient, family, or group to improve outcomes associated with
the problem.
Identify the patient, family, or group.
Discuss the benefits of gathering their input to improve care associated with the problem.
Identify best-practice strategies from the literature for effective communication and collaboration to improve outcomes.
Explain how state board nursing practice standards
and/or organizational or governmental policies guided the development of
your proposed intervention.
Cite the standards and/or policies that guided your work.
Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these standards and/or policies in improving outcomes for this problem.
Explain how your proposed intervention will improve the
quality of care, enhance patient safety, and reduce costs to the system
and individual.
Cite evidence from the literature that supports your conclusions.
Identify relevant and available sources of
benchmark data on care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system
and individual.
Explain how technology, care coordination, and the utilization of community resources can be applied in addressing the problem.
Cite evidence from the literature that supports your conclusions.
Write concisely and directly, using active voice.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.
Format: Format the written analysis of your intervention using APA style. APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] is provided to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include:
A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
Appropriate section headings.
Length: Your paper should be approximately 5–7 pages in length, not including the reference page.
Supporting evidence: Cite at least five
sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central
ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text
citations and references in APA format.
Proofreading: Proofread your paper,
before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and
make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.
Portfolio Prompt: Save your intervention to your ePortfolio.
After you complete your program, you may want to consider leveraging
your portfolio as part of a job search or other demonstration of your
academic and professional competencies.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will
demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and
scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.
Define the role of leadership and change
management in addressing a patient, family, or population health problem
and includes a copy of intervention/solution/professional product.
Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient safety, and reduce the cost of care.
Explain how a proposed intervention to address a
patient, family, or population health problem will improve the quality
of care, enhance patient safety, and reduce costs to the system and
individual.
Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.
Explain how technology, care coordination, and
the utilization of community resources can be applied in addressing a
patient, family, or population health problem.
Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.
Explain how state board nursing practice
standards and/or organizational or governmental policies guided the
development of a proposed intervention.
Competency 6: Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and population outcomes.
Propose strategies for communicating and
collaborating with a patient, family, or group to improve outcomes
associated with a patient, family, or population health problem.
Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
Write concisely and directly, using active voice.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.