Adverse Childhood Experiences: What is an Ounce of Prevention Worth? From statis

Adverse Childhood Experiences: What is an Ounce of Prevention Worth?
From statis

Adverse Childhood Experiences: What is an Ounce of Prevention Worth?
From statistical data, in addition to redlining laws and policies, identify three risk-related behaviors that are common among adolescents in your community. Explain how they could create antecedent factors that might be manifested in their adult lives and across the life course. What sources of information were used to construct your response?
Please remember for discussion posts: the initial post must be uploaded by the WEDNESDAY of the week and two replies to your peers by Saturday at 2359.
Please note the grading rubric for the discussion board.
As a reminder, all discussion posts must be a minimum of 350 words initial and 250 words peer responses, references must be cited in APA format 7th Edition, and must include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 5 years. Remember references do not count towards the word count.

Writing Assignment #2: Appraise the Qualitative Evidence This writing assignment

Writing Assignment #2: Appraise the Qualitative Evidence
This writing assignment

Writing Assignment #2: Appraise the Qualitative Evidence
This writing assignment involves the student researching databases to find a relevant research article. Then the student will begin an article appraisal by addressing the research problem and literature review. This writing assignment will serve as the foundation for the second writing assignment. This allows for students to receive feedback from peers, from the writing center and faculty, which can be incorporated into the second article critique.
Objectives:
1.Critically appraise a chosen primary research nursing article. The required course textbook will be used as a guide in critically appraising a qualitative article.
2.Synthesize the information from discussion questions, research textbook, and chosen research article to support the elements of article critique.
3.Understand how an article critique can determine the appropriateness of research in evidence-based practice (EBP).
4.Determine the elements of a well written research article.
Directions:
1.2) Locate one primary qualitative research article that is related to the student’s topic of interest. The chosen article must be obtained from the library database and in pdf journal format.
2.3) Write a 6–8 pages paper in APA (7th edition) format (exclude the title page, abstract, and reference page in page count) that addresses the following points:
3.
1.a) Abstract (see previous abstract guidelines).
2.b) Introduction (see previous introduction guidelines).
3.c) State the problem.
§Evaluate if the researchers described the significance of the problem and/or its importance to nursing practice.
§Evaluate if the researchers provided the background of the problem.
§Evaluate if a clear problem statement exists. d) Statethepurpose.
§Explain if research objectives were used to guide the study.
§Explain if an overall research question was present.
e) Literature Review
Justify if the literature review included a description of a theory and previous studies.
Explain if the references are current. Include the number and percentage of sources in the last 10 years and in the last 5 years.
f) Sampling
Assess if inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified.
Identify the number of participants in the sample.
Assess if the author/s identified the specific type of sampling that was used. If not, identify and explain the sampling method used. If more than one type of sampling was used, explain if the author/s identified the number of participants recruited through each type of sampling.
1.g) Ethical considerations
oExplain if the study was reviewed by an institutional or ethical board.
oExplain the process for informed consent
o
oh) Data collection
oIdentify the methods used to collect data.
2.
oExplain how the researcher managed and analyzed the data including its appropriateness. i) Results
oExplain how the participants were described—age, marital status, or other relevant demographic variables.
oExplain if the results of the analysis were presented as themes, concepts, or a diagram. Discuss the components of the themes, concepts, or the diagram
o
oj) Discussion
oIdentify two findings discussed by the researchers. Explain the findings of the study.
oDiscuss and explain the limitations of the study.
oAssess if the researcher indicated whether the findings might be applicable to other samples. Explain.
oIdentify the implications of the findings for nursing practice if there are any. Explain.
oIdentify suggestions for further study.
o
ok) ArticleCritique
oDiscuss the importance of article critique in EBP.
oDiscuss the strengths and weaknesses of the primary research article based on your explanation in the discussion section.
oDetermine the article’s usefulness for practice changes.
o
ol) Conclusion
Reiterate the main points: thesis, significance, implications, and any future research recommendation/s of your chosen article.
4) Use level 1 and 2 headings (using APA guidelines).
5) Include at least 2 direct quotes in the body of the paper.
Remember that it has to be a primary qualitative research article. Avoid articles that are a review of a bunch of different articles. Avoid systematic reviews, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, meta-summary, or literature reviews. Also make sure it is qualitative instead of quantitative.
Make sure that all articles cited in your paper are added to your reference page.
Make sure that all sources on your reference page are cited in your paper.
Remember that you need to cite your sources. When you pull information from an article you need to add a citation to your paper.
Avoid putting the title of the articles in your paper. Instead of writing According to the Evidenced Based Practice: Nursing Research textbook…… Instead say: According to Grove & Gray (2022)….
Avoid the use of the first person in an APA paper, unless it’s a personal essay. Avoiding the use of the first person will help strengthen your paper.

– Remember that you will be finding a primary qualitative research article that was written within the last 5 years and written by at least 1 nurse or published in a nursing journal. Please do not submit an article that says systematic review, literature review, meta-analysis, or meta synthesis. Remember those are secondary articles, not primary.
-I want you to pick an qualitative article within 2hrs and send it to me. PLEASE!!
– I’ve also attached the rubric below. Please read all the info in there and in the directions carefully and write the paper accordingly.
– NO PLAGIARISM should be found.
-A sample paper has been attached below. Don’t choose the same topic in there.
-This has to be a QUALITATIVE RESEARCH paper written by a nurse based on their own research study and not critiquing on someone else’s research
– As I said earlier, the PRIMARY QUALITATIVE ARTICLE has to be done within 12hrs in order for me to submit it today. please!!.
– The rest of the paper can be completed within 6 days and I’ll be giving you feedback according to my professor and classmates.
-The whole paper should be 6-8 pages without the title page, abstract, and the reference page.
-Write the paper in the format as in the example paper.

a)Abstract
Keep it at 100-150 words.
Identify the research topic or purpose of the research – why the study was done.
Identify the population and method – who were in the study and how the study was done.
Identify the results and application of results or findings to the nursing profession.
Identify the three to five keywords used on your article search.
Watch this. video before writing the abstract:
a)Introduction
Hook – identify your topic and the angle you are taking; your hook needs to capture the reader’s attention.
Context – provide a background, an explanation on the significance of your topic and what the research will address.
Thesis – provide a clearly defined thesis statement
b)Article search process
Explain the choice of topic.
List the database, search terms, and method used to narrow the results.
Narrate if difficulties occurred in your article search.
c)Literature Review/Background/Introduction
Evaluate the article’s literature review if it is comprehensive, current, and of good quality. (Did it look at different aspects of the problem, was the topic of interest described well or indicated the state of the science? Was it in the scholarly date range for when the study was completed, and was it from a scholarly journal?)
Identify if the references are current, including the number and percentage of sources in the last 10 years and in the last 5 years from the time the research was performed or published. (Note the date the research was done, if presented.)
Specify the new information learned about the topic of the research study after reading the literature review or introduction.
Survey the reference list of your article. In APA format, identify and list two primary quantitative research articles from the reference list. Then, identify and list one secondary article from your article’s reference list.
d)Methods
Identify the specific design of the study. Use a direct quote from your article and then define it using a direct quote from your textbook.
Identify the population, sample, and characteristic of the participants.
Identify the inclusion and/or exclusion criteria.
Identify the sample size. Discern and justify if the sample size is adequate.
Describe how the rights of the participants were protected, including the risks to the participants.
Identify the data collection process and explain role of the investigator in this process.
Identify and explain the internal and external threats to validity.
Identify and explain the strategies used to ensure rigor and trustworthiness.
e)Findings
Identify the findings of the study.
Identify and discern the implications of this research to the nursing profession.
Identify and explain the implications for future research.
Identify the level and strength of evidence the study provides.
f)Conclusion
Reiterate the main points: thesis, significance, implications, and any future research recommendation/s of your chosen article.
3)Include at least two direct quotes in APA format.
4)Use the peer review process to strengthen your paper.
5) Submit a hardcopy of the paper, peer review, and article in class. All hardcopies for submission must be printed double-sided.

Let me know if you have any questions.
Please give me the primary quantitative article within 2 hrs, thanks!

Week 5: The Theoretical/Conceptual Framework The theoretical framework is a crit

Week 5: The Theoretical/Conceptual Framework
The theoretical framework is a crit

Week 5: The Theoretical/Conceptual Framework
The theoretical framework is a critical element of your work. A theoretical framework is the general representation of relationships in your problem and is based on existing theory. The conceptual framework is your idea on how the problem should be explored, and it is generally based on a theory. The difference between the two is the scope. Theory is broad; concept is narrow.
In most research studies, your framework can be either theoretical or conceptual in nature. For the purposes of this project, you will most likely follow a conceptual framework, which is your idea on how the research problem will be explored (although you could have both).
For example:
Theoretical framework: Stimulus is applied to elicit a response
Conceptual framework: A new teaching method is applied to elicit improvement in midterm test scores.
In this section of your change project paper, state the perspective through which the problem and/or phenomenon may be explored, and include the following:
Select a minimum of two theories.
Identify the process and logic in selecting these theoretical frameworks or conceptual frameworks for your study.
Discuss how each theory or model applies to the individual project.
Present the framework guiding your study.
Describe the assumptions of the framework.
Describe each key component of the framework.
Discuss how each element of the phenomenon applies to the framework.
Apply each element of the theory to the elements of the phenomenon under study.
Develop the rationale for the sample selection criteria.
Discuss, analyze, and critique pertinent research that uses the framework.
Remember that research never proves theory. Your research project can only support or refute the theoretical propositions you are using as your framework. But if you do not use theory or conceptual frameworks in your research, you may not be able to put your findings in a context that could strengthen the nursing education profession!
This section should be 3–4 pages in length, not including the cover or reference page. You must reference a minimum of 3 scholarly articles.
Use current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources. Review the rubric for more information on how the assignment will be graded.
***** ATTACHED ARE THE PREVIOUS ASSIGNMENTS PART OF THIS ONGOING PROJECT***
Rubric
NURS_691A_DE – NURS 691-A Rubric Week 5: Theoretical Framework
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
60 to >49.2 ptsMeets Expectations
Identifies independent theories or conceptual models that relate to the change project topic and describes how they will be applied to the change project. Thoroughly discusses how each element of the phenomenon applies to the framework. Clearly applies each element of the theory to the elements of the phenomenon under study. Develops the rationale for the sample selection criteria, and expertly discusses, analyzes, and critiques pertinent research that uses the framework.
49.2 to >45.0 ptsApproaches Expectations
Identifies independent theories or conceptual models that relate to the change project topic and describes how they will be applied to the change project. Discusses how most elements of the phenomenon apply to the framework, but may be lacking specific details. Attempts to apply each element of the theory to the elements of the phenomenon under study but may not make clear connections. Develops the rationale for the sample selection criteria, and briefly discusses pertinent research that uses the framework, but may be somewhat lacking in analysis and/or critique.
45 to >35.4 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Identifies independent theories or conceptual models but they may only indirectly relate to the change project topic. May not discuss how elements of the phenomenon apply to the framework. Connections to each element of the theory to the elements of the phenomenon are vague and unclear. The rationale for the sample selection criteria and pertinent research that uses the framework may be missing or severely lacking in analysis and/or critique.
35.4 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Fails to identify a theory or conceptual model or it is written in such a way that no relationships can be identified.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
7.5 to >6.15 ptsMeets Expectations
Content is well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated.
6.15 to >5.63 ptsApproaches Expectations
Content is overly wordy or lacking in specific language. Information is reasonably organized and communicated.
5.63 to >4.43 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Content is disorganized in many places and it lacks clarity.
4.43 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Content lacks clarity and information is disorganized, or may be an outline or a list.
7.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format/Mechanics
7.5 to >6.15 ptsMeets Expectations
Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.
6.15 to >5.63 ptsApproaches Expectations
Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.
5.63 to >4.43 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Assignment contains some spelling and grammatical errors.
4.43 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.
7.5 pts
Total Points: 75

Preparing the AssignmentDownload the required Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Temp

Preparing the AssignmentDownload the required Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Temp

Preparing the AssignmentDownload the required Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Template below.
Do not stereotype a cultural/ethnic group. Stereotyping will result in point deduction. See rubric.
Address the questions on the provided template:Description of Issue, Indicator, and FocusDescribe approved transcultural nursing issue from Course Project
Describe approved Healthy People 2030 Leading Health Indicator
Describe approved cultural focus
References with PermalinkProvide APA references for two peer-reviewed scholarly professional journal articles related to your nursing issue, cultural focus and/or health indicator.Articles must be published within the last five (5) years. If you are unsure whether the article is appropriate, ask your instructor.
Include the permalink to the article.
SummarySummarize the key points from each peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal articles selected in one or two paragraphs. Be clear and concise.
Educational PlanImagine you are educating a group of fellow nurses.
Clearly describe what key points would you share with them?
What would you suggest as best practices?
What ethical issues or conflict of care could potentially exist?
Please reach out to your instructor with any questions or concerns.

16 diseases Each disease will contain symptoms, labs, treatments, diet, nursing

16 diseases
Each disease will contain symptoms, labs, treatments, diet, nursing

16 diseases
Each disease will contain symptoms, labs, treatments, diet, nursing intervention and medication
8 diseases can fit on one page
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

This is an online Mental health nursing class. we are required to read a case s

This is an online Mental health nursing class.
we are required to read a case s

This is an online Mental health nursing class.
we are required to read a case study every week and create a response (discussion post) about the case.
Answer all questions after reading the case, and create a discussion about the case.
PLease answer all questions and include the answer in the discussion about the case.
APA format, citations, and references are required to justify the discussion. Only peer-reviewed material is allowed to justify the writing.
250-500 words to create the discussion
Please read the case study above, and create a discussion in the form of a narrative assay.
• Create a discussion about the case study and include in the discussion the answer to all 6 questions above.
• Answer the questions after reading the case study and create a discussion response about the case study.
• Use APA format writing, citations, and references. Use peer-reviewed articles/material only to justify the response when creating the discussion about the case.
• All answers to the questions must be included in the discussion.
• The discussion (assignment) should be from 250-500 words long.
Find the case study and instructions to write the assignment (discussion post) about the case for the week.
Thank you

For this assessment, you will create a 2–4 page report on an interview you have

For this assessment, you will create a 2–4 page report on an interview you have

For this assessment, you will create a 2–4 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach, and review best practices and evidence to address the issue. INTRODUCTION As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, your participation and leadership in interdisciplinary teams will be vital to the health outcomes for your patients and organization. One way to approach designing an improvement project is to use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement describes it thus:
The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is shorthand for testing a change in the real work setting—by planning it, trying it, observing the results, and acting on what is learned. This is the scientific method adapted for action-oriented learning…Essentially, the PDSA cycle helps you test out change ideas on a smaller scale before evaluating the results and making adjustments before potentially launching into a somewhat larger scale project (n.d.).You might also recognize that the PDSA cycle resembles the nursing process. The benefit of gaining experience with this model of project design is that it provides nurses with an opportunity to ideate and lead improvements. For this assessment, you will not be implementing all of the PDSA cycle. Instead, you are being asked to interview a health care professional of your choice to determine what kind of interdisciplinary problem he or she is experiencing or has experienced in the workplace. This interview, in Assessment 2, will inform the research that you will conduct to propose a plan for interdisciplinary collaboration in Assessment 3.
It would be an excellent choice to complete the PDSA Cycle activity prior to developing the report. The activity consists of four questions that create the opportunity to check your understanding of best practices related to each stage of the PDSA cycle. The information gained from completing this formative will promote your success with the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification report. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.
ReferenceInstitute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). How to improve. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/de…
Download Interview Guide [DOCX]
Download Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX],
Additional Requirements
Competencies Measured
Scoring Guide
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
Expand All
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6

Case study: You are working in a family practice when Joe, a recently divorced

Case study:
You are working in a family practice when Joe, a recently divorced

Case study:
You are working in a family practice when Joe, a recently divorced 56-year-old Caucasian man, presents to you with complaints of insomnia and fatigue. He denies any recent injury or specific pain and was last seen in your office 11 months ago where he disclosed that he was going through a divorce due to his sexual orientation. Joe has taken an antihypertensive medication to control his blood pressure for three years and does not report any adverse side effects. Joe has worked in law enforcement for 14 years. He recently discharged his firearm for the first time. Even though no one was injured, Joe has been attending mandated appointments with the department psychologist. Joe reports that he does not have a regular exercise regimen. To relax, he typically goes fishing or has a few beers after his shift. Other than the mandated appointments with the department psychologist, Joe has not sought any mental health treatment. During the appointment, Joe states that it’s hard for him to talk about how he is feeling and begins to cry.
Four differential diagnoses and rationales with references. Support your answers with peer-reviewed references.
Create a plan of care for that patient.
Plan must include pharmacology, non-pharmacology, labs/diagnostics, referrals/interprofessional communications, patient education (10 to 15 individual items minimum), and follow-up.
Make sure to pick one health maintenance item for this patient (primary or secondary) and explain to the patient why this is important.
Address one existing or potential social determinant of health for this patient during your visit. How will you help the patient overcome this obstacle to health care?
Peer reviewed citations no lesser than 15 years.

In this exercise, you will complete a Mind Map Template to gauge your understand

In this exercise, you will complete a Mind Map Template to gauge your understand

In this exercise, you will complete a Mind Map Template to gauge your understanding of this week’s content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap Template.
Generalized anxiety disorder
Depression
Bipolar disorders
Schizophrenia
Delirium and dementia
Obsessive compulsive disease
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)