Category: Nursing homework help

plase use apa 7th edition , 500 words and 2 resources within last 5 years. pls l

plase use apa 7th edition , 500 words and 2 resources within last 5 years. pls look t attached document for further instructins 

PowerPoint presentation 15 slides, not including a title and reference slide, w

PowerPoint presentation 15 slides, not including a title and reference slide, with 200-word speaker notes for each slide and a table (details below). Attached are reports to use as additional resources. APA 7 format, 11 pt. Calibri font., with proper in-text citations. Include two to three (2–3) scholarly references published within the last 5 years to substantiate your work. Please provide a copy of all references, A.I., and plagiarism reports 
Assignment Details: 
Imagine you are a Program Manager or Technical Analyst, working for the World Health Organization (WHO) or Non-governmental Organization (NGO). You have been asked to put together a PowerPoint presentation, about what you learned at the recent World Health Summit.  Be sure to include the following information in your presentation: 
Explain your job duties. 
Describe the history and development of the Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx), and explain why it was formed. Include the types of services it provides around the world. 
Explain how the WHO, GHDx, and the World Health Summit are involved in world health, including information about how new technology is provided for foreign countries. 
Provide and describe the types of healthcare technology available in foreign countries. This can include low-income, middle-income, and high-income economies. 
Select 5 of the best healthcare organizations in the world and summarize the services they provide. Explain why these are considered the best healthcare organizations in the world. 

In a table, outline significant differences among the 4 nations offering the best health care and those providing low-quality health care. 
When rating health care around the world, show how the health care rankings for each country can be used to justify the need for health care reform in these countries. 
Choose 2 low-income countries that you feel will benefit from health care reform, and explain why you feel this way. 

Please answer the questions below
What should be included in an introductory pa

Please answer the questions below
What should be included in an introductory paragraph of a research article?
Select an introduction from scholarly, peer-reviewed research, and appraise the introduction to assess whether it includes the necessary elements of an introduction. Why and why not?
How does PICOT help form a clinical question? Use Box 2.2 in your textbook to discuss population, intervention, comparison intervention, and outcome and how this process helps the student arrive at a quality clinical question.

pls use apa 7 edtiion 500 words and and 2 acedmic resoucce. pls read attachment

pls use apa 7 edtiion 500 words and and 2 acedmic resoucce. pls read attachment attached for further instructions 

To assess a clinical issue that is the focus of your Quality Improvement Proj

To assess a clinical issue that is the focus of your Quality Improvement Project.
Create a description of the clinical issue to be addressed in the project.

 
Describe diagnostic criteria for nausea and vomiting and treatment recommen

 
Describe diagnostic criteria for nausea and vomiting and treatment recommendations
Discuss symptoms of GERD, complications, and drug management
Compare and contrast Crohn’s disease and Ulcerative colitis
Discuss Diabetes, its causes, symptoms, and treatment 
 Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Each question must be answered individually  

Considering the growing body of evidence linking the immune system and inflamma

Considering the growing body of evidence linking the immune system and inflammatory processes to various psychiatric disorders, discuss:
1-   How inflammation and immune dysregulation may contribute to the pathophysiology of conditions such as depression, anxiety, and schizophrenia. 
2-   How might this understanding influence treatment approaches and the development of new therapeutic interventions?
3-   Discuss specific biomarkers of inflammation
The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Two scholarly source references are required unless stated otherwise by your professor. 
The student provides a substantive response to the discussion question or topic on Thursday day and posts a minimum of two additional responses to peers on another day(s). The answers to classmates must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm Eastern Time. We expect each student to participate in the discussion board in a respectful manner. 
Remember that a new discussion rubric was approved by the professors, committee members, and a majority of the students. Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points. 
Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:
Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)
Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)
Inclusion of APNA standards essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable.(10%)
Rigor, currency,  and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)
Peer & Professor Responses. The number of responses, quality of response posts. (20%)
Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%)

Identify a theory that uses a concept of interest to you that can be applied in

Identify a theory that uses a concept of interest to you that can be applied in research and nursing practice (clinical, 
CriteriaRatingsPts
Brief discussion of theory origins, scope/level of theory and how the theory relates to the concept of interest (20 pts)
20 pts
Clear, correct discussion of origins of theory, scope/level of theory, and how the theory relates to the concept of interest (20 pts)
15 pts
Limited discussion of origins of theory, scope/level of theory, and how the theory relates to the concept of interest (15 pts)
10 pts
Identified origins of theory, scope/level of theory, and how the theory relates to the concept of interest with minimal discussion in 1-2 areas (10 pts)
5 pts
Identified origins of theory, OR scope/level of theory, OR how the theory relates to the concept of interest AND minimum to poor discussion. (5 pts)
0 pts
Origins of theory, scope/level of theory, and how the theory relates to the concept of interest not discussed or poorly discussed (0 pts)
/ 20 pts
Identification of major theory concepts (minimum of 3 concepts) (20 pts)
20 pts
Correctly identifies all major concepts (20 pts)
15 pts
Identifies some (50- 75%) of major concepts (15 pts)
10 pts
Identifies few (25-50%) of major concepts (10 pts)
5 pts
Incorrectly identified concepts (5 pts)
0 pts
Concepts not identified (0 pts)
/ 20 pts
Brief discussion of relationships among main concepts (propositions) within the theory (20 pts)
20 pts
Clear, correct discussion of relationships (20 pts)
15 pts
Limited discussion of some (50 -75%) relationships (15 pts)
10 pts
Limited discussion of all relationships OR poor discussion of some relationships (10 pts)
5 pts
Incorrectly identified relationships OR poor discussion of all relationships (5 pts)
0 pts
Relationships not discussed (0 pts)
/ 20 pts
Theoretical definitions of two concepts. One definition must be that of the concept of interest. (20 pts)
20 pts
Correctly defined two concepts (concept of interest and other concept (20 pts)
15 pts
Correctly defined concept of interest; incorrect definition of other concept (15 pts)
10 pts
Incorrectly defined the concept of interest; correctly defined other concept (10 pts)
5 pts
Concept of interest not defined/identified; other concept defined correctly OR Incorrectly defined both concepts (5 pts)
0 pts
No theoretical definitions (0 pts)
/ 20 pts
Use of original sources (or as close as possible) to describe theory (10 pts)
10 pts
Used 5 or more sources, in the description of theory) with one original source (10 pts)
7.5 pts
Used 4 or more sources, in the description of theory one source close to original (7.5 pts)
5 pts
Used 3 or more sources, in the description of theory one source close to original (5 pts)
2.5 pts
Textbooks were only source OR used only one source close to original, in the description of theory (2.5 pts)
0 pts
No sources used (0 pts)
/ 10 pts
APA Style & Format (10 points total) • Style includes: Professional and orderly presentation of ideas (precision and clarity). Grammar, spelling and punctuation. Minimal use of direct quotes (1-2 max.) • Format includes: Proper use of title page (using specified format), spacing, font, margins, and headings. Appropriate citation of sources in text and reference list. • Up to 0.5 points will be deducted for each type of grammar, spelling, punctuation, or format error. • Up to two points will be deducted for poor headings /insufficient headings/formatting
10 pts
0-2 types of errors (9-10 pts)
8 pts
3-4 types of errors (8 pts)
7 pts
5-6 types of errors (7 pts)
6 pts
7-8 types of errors (6 pts)
0 pts
> 8 types of errors (5 or less pts)
/ 10 pts

The term “informatics” seems to have a different meaning for many. This week we

The term “informatics” seems to have a different meaning for many. This week we will learn about the role of informatics in healthcare. For this discussion please respond to each of the following prompts:
How would you define the term informatics as it relates to healthcare? 
Ask two colleagues what the term healthcare informatics means to them and report on what they have stated.
Review the term “informatics” in your textbook (Hebda, Hunter, & Czar, 2019) or a definition offered by another scholarly resource. Then, compare and contrastyour perspective, the perspective of your colleagues, and the definition from the text by answering the following:

How do the individual perspectives (yours and your colleagues) align with the textbook or scholarly resource definition?
How are the individual perspectives (you and your colleagues) different than the textbook definition?

For this assignment, you will prepare a 5 to 6 page review of the literature pe

For this assignment, you will prepare a 5 to 6 page review of the literature pertinent ***** and to use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem.
Conduct a search of literature relevant to the problem/topic. Identify a minimum of 4 references, most of which are randomized clinical trials. Only one opinion articles may be included.
Read the peer- reviewed articles with the focus of preparing a document that will compare and contrast the information in the articles you found. Copies of the articles used must be submitted with the final assignment.
The reader of your literature review should be able to clearly identify the gaps in the knowledge in the problem area as well as the purpose of the study you are proposing. You should be able to write enough to create an effective argument but not so much that the result looks padded. 
Prepare an Evidence Matrix using the template attached
Submission Instructions:
 
 Introduction must include:
Your PICOT question. (BREAK DOWN THE PICOT FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT USING MY QUESTION TITLE)
Purpose of or rationale for the scholarly project:

Provide an evidence-based explanation of why it is necessary to complete your scholarly project and what benefit will be gained (health promotion, fiscal, and efficiency).

Background on the problem or population of interest:

Using primary sources, provide data on your topic.
Providing the background will demonstrate the focused need for your project.

Significance of the problem to nursing and health care:

State how your problem or population of interest aligns with the larger interest of health care in the community.
Create a context to why your topic is important.

Benefit of the project to nursing practice:

State what will be gained from your project.
Describe the expected outcomes of your project to practice within your population and setting.
Relate the outcomes to evidence-based guidelines and outcomes.
Describe how your project may influence other populations or settings.

The assignment is 5-6pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.
Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
FOR THE EVIDENCE MATRIX: (I INCLUDED THE TEMPLATE FOR THE MATRIX)
The Evidence Matrix can help you organize your research before writing your literature review.  Use it to identify patterns and cohesions in the articles you have found similar methodologies?  common theoretical frameworks? It helps you make sure that all your major concepts covered.It also helps you see how your research fits into the context of the overall topic.
A literature review provides a summary of previous research on a topic that appraises, categorizes, and compares what has been previously published on a specific topic. It lets the author to synthesize and place into context the research and scholarly literature relevant to the topic. It helps to plan the different methods to a given question and reveals patterns. It forms the foundation for the author’s subsequent research and defends the significance of the new investigation.
The introduction should define the topic and set the stage for the literature review. It will include the author’s perspective or point of view on the topic, how they have defined the scope of the topic (including what’s not included), and how the review will be organized. It can point out overall trends, conflicts in methodology or conclusions, and gaps in the research.
In the body of the review, the author should organize the research into major topics and subtopics. These groupings may be by subject, type of research such as case studies, methodology such as qualitative, genre, chronology, or other common characteristics. Within these groups, the author can then discuss the evidences of each article and examine and compare the importance of each article to similar ones.
The conclusion will summarize the main findings of the review of literature supports or not the research to follow and may give direction for further research.
The list of references will include full citations for all the items mentioned in the literature review.
**PLEASE ATTACH A COPY OF A PLAGARISM AND AI REPORT , I HAVE TO TURN IN THIS ASSIGNMENT TO TURN IT IN **
*PLEASE ATTACH THE 4 SCHOLARLY ARTICLES USED*
BELOW I HAVE ATTACHED 4 ARTICLES TO USE AND YOU CAN INCLUDE 1 OTHER ARTICLE.
I HAVE ALSO INCLUDED THE TEMPLATE FOR THE EVIDENCE MATRIX CHART
I HAVE ALSO INCLUDED THE GRADING RUBRIC FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT