Night by Elie Wiesel: Eliezer’s Changing Relationship With His Father

In the novel, the relationship between Eliezer and his father before and after Hitler deports them is observed to be strong. However, the experiences that they go through together at the Nazi death camp transform that relationship. This essay will explore the relationship between Eliezer and his father and how it changes throughout the novel.

Relationship of respect and obedience

At the beginning of the story, the relationship existing between Eliezer and his father is held together by a bond of mutual understanding and respect. In Sighet, his father is seen as a respected member belonging to the community of the Jews (Jablon 317).

Even though he refuses to take the mentorship role over his son’s training of mysticism, Eliezer still regards him with utmost respect not only because of his position in the Jewish community but because it was expected of him to follow the example of other Orthodox Jewish families (Frunza 99).

Relationship of love and dependence

At Birkenau, Elie and his father are separated from the rest of their family members. He began to feel the loss and gripped with fear of losing his father, the forthcoming experiences and need for protection; he clings to his father (Spector 40).

At some point in the story, his father weeps at the thought of what Elie will go through at the death camp, and the expression of emotions by his father assures him of love (Bauer 22). When Eli is taken to Block 17 after separation with his father, he worries about his well being and continues offering support. They rely on each other for strength to working and survival (Misco 10).

Relationship of anger and frustration

While in the concentration camps, the oppressions make keeping a good relationship between Elie and his father cumbersome. His father narrowly escapes death after being beaten thoroughly by a 13-year-old in the presence of Elie for failing to make his bed properly (Frunza 99). Also, his father receives beatings from a gypsy and Idek the camp overseer (Spector 40).

Unable to help and faced with embarrassment and frustrations, he directs his anger at his father (Jablon 317). Even though he cares for him, he does not understand why his father is always at fault and why he can’t defend himself (Hospital 360). His attitude towards his father begins to change.

Wesley sees his father as a burden

Even though the bond between Elie and his father is strong, at some point in the story, he sees his father as a burden. During the first selection, Elie’ gets upset when his father fails to pass the test, and this forces him to work extra hard for both of them to survive (Misco 10). Additionally, his father is almost thrown out of the cattle cars for fear that he is dead. Elie is forced to slap his father to wake up (Bauer 22).

Additionally, he has to fight and kill a person grabbing food from his father on the train (Hospital 360). From these, Elie sees his father as a burden and despite the adversity growing between them and his struggles to keep the relationship. These events cause a change in attitude towards his father, and at one point he leaves his father to die during an air raid (Jablon 317).

Works Cited

Bauer, Markus. “Coming to Terms with the Past: Romania” History Today, 57.2 (2007): 21-23. Research Library, ProQuest. Web.

Frunza, Sandu. “Ethics, religion, and memory in Elie Wiesel’s night” Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 9.26 (2010): 94-113. ProQuest Religion, ProQuest. Web.

Hospital, Clifford. “Towards maturity in inter-faith dialogue” Cross Currents 57.3 (2007): 356-365. ProQuest Religion, ProQuest. Web.

Jablon, Rachel Leah. “Witnessing as Shivah; Memoir as Yizkor: The Formulation of Holocaust Survivor Literature as Gemilut Khasadim ” Journal of Popular Culture 38.2 (2004): 306-324. Research Library, ProQuest. Web.

Misco, Thomas.”Nobody told us about what happened”: the current state of Holocaust education in Romania.”International Education, 38.1 (2008): 6-21. Research Library, ProQuest. Web.

Spector, Karen. “God on the Gallows: Reading the Holocaust through Narratives of Redemption ” Research in the Teaching of English 42.1 (2007): 7-55. Research Library, ProQuest. Web.

Nazi Deception and “Night” by Elie Wiesel

Introduction

Night” is a novel written by Elie Wiesel. The author narrates about his own experience of survival at the Nazi camps. The novel depicts the horrors and sufferings of people at the time of World War II and the life at the death camps built by Nazis in Europe. At the same time, it shows the deception, demoralization, and dehumanization spread by Nazi.

The Crime against Humanity

The actions of Nazis in Europe were called the crime against humanity. The mass killings of men, women, and children put the moral pressure on other imprisoned. The dehumanization provoked the demoralization at the camps. Eliezer, the main character of the novel and the prototype of the author, became one of the victims of the Nazi occupation in Europe.

In the novel, he depicts the horrors of that time. He and other members of his family had been taken to the ghettos in the Carpathian Transylvania. He observed the cynicism and rigidity of the Hungarian police. He told that it was the time when he started to hate them (Wiesel, 1992). Later, Eliezer and his father were sent to Auschwitz. Eliezer told that they did not know where his mother and sisters were but, after some time, they found out that they were sent to the gas camera as soon as they arrived at the camp.

The horrors observed by Eliezer and his fellows exhausted them morally. “Babies were thrown into the air, and the machine gunners used them as targets. This was in the forest of Galicia, near Kolomaye” (Wiesel, p.4). After observing this terrible scene, he started rethinking his attitude to life and moral as well as his faith in God.

Prisoners Demoralization

The life at the ghettos was the struggle for survival every day and every night. The exasperation of the prisoners became the natural outcome of their oppression caused by seeing the deaths every day.

“The passengers on our boat were amusing themselves by throwing coins to the ‘natives,’ who were diving in to get them…. I suddenly noticed that two children were engaged in a death struggle, trying to strangle each other” (Wiesel p.95).

Eliezer’s Memories

The novel is enriched with the memories of Eliezer of Nazis brutality. He and his fellows suffered from the famine and moral and physical exhaustion. At the same time, they observed the cruelty of the Nazi jailors.

“As we were not allowed to bend down, everyone took out his spoon and ate the accumulated snow off his neighbor’s back. The SS who were watching laughed at the spectacle” (Wiesel p.92).

The author describes his experience at the concentration camps as the murder of his soul, his dreams, and his God (Night. Study Guide n.d.). There are no exact figures of the deaths at the Nazi concentration camps. Some estimated the number of killed ranging from 1 885 889 to 2 045 215 casualties (Concentration Camp System 2019).

Conclusion

Elie Wiesel, the Holocaust survivor, described his life experience at the Nazi concentration camps in Night, his famous novel. His memories depicted on the pages of his book make us think about the lessons of World War II for mankind. The Nazi deception, demoralization, and dehumanization spread at the camps produced the thousands of moral victims of the Nazi regime. We should always remember those people and do our best to avoid the repeat of the horrors of World War II.

Works Cited

. (2019.). Holocaust Encyclopedia. Web.

. (n.d.). Web.

Wiesel, Elie. Night, South Melbourne, New York: Bantam Books, 1982. Print.

Critique of Elie Wiesel’s Holocaust Book “Night”

Like many books on the Holocaust, Elie Wiesel’s Night is a dramatic picture of the horror times in the history of humankind and particularly in the history of the Jewish people. Unlike many other books on the Holocaust, Night impresses with its pessimism and disbelief. While many authors describe the victory of good over evil and relish in the happiness of being freed, Wiesel admits that he has lost his faith and that many of his prior positive opinions ultimately vanished.

The book agrees with my view of the world in that everyone is equal and it is unfair to treat people differently merely because of their nationality or any other peculiarities. Wiesel depicts the shocking things done to the Jews just because someone decided they were worse than others. In my opinion, being a human is, first of all, being compassionate and not indifferent to others’ pains. Wiesel’s father is a good example of this: he “was more involved with the welfare of others than with that of his own kin” (Wiesel 4), he “did not want to discourage the others, to throw salt on their wounds” (Wiesel 11). Even in pain, when “his cheek still bore the red mark of the hand” (Wiesel 39), he says “It doesn’t hurt” (Wiesel 39) to prevent his son from an outbreak of violence, which would lead to bad outcomes. The soldiers and officers, on the opposite, represent everything inhumane there can be: “without passion or haste, they shot their prisoners” (Wiesel 6), “He looked at us as one would a pack of leprous dogs clinging to life” (Wiesel 38). These and many other examples from the book show how important it is always to remain a human and how unjust people can be toward others out of no reason. I think that such unfairness should be eradicated by all possible means.

The book has presented a challenge to my views on religion and faith. The author describes how he had been very interested in religion at first, how he endeavored to understand God’s ways. Later, however, he remarks how he lost his faith, and his words could not leave me unperturbed. He says, “Never shall I forget those moments that murdered my God and my soul and turned my dreams to ashes” (Wiesel 34). The author stopped praying and he “was not denying His existence,” but “doubted His absolute justice” (Wiesel 45). The following words had the most dramatic effect on me: “How could I say to Him: Blessed be Thou, Almighty, Master of the Universe, who chose us among all nations to be tortured day and night, to watch as our fathers, our mothers, our brothers end up in the furnaces?” (Wiesel 67). These words evoked a whole set of feelings, and they made me start doubting, which was rather scary. The person’s loss of faith is an utterly crucial thing, for if one loses faith in God, he loses belief in everything.

The book depicts the things that are essential to my family and me, such as love, care, and compassion. It shows how important it is to have faith at least in each other, even if you lose faith in everything else. My community cherishes freedom for everyone, and it is sad to know that there have been times when totally equal people treated each other in a very uneven way.

Elie Wiesel’s Night is a bitter book, but it is the harsh truth about how people have treated other people. Thus, I believe that everyone should read it and contemplate the things depicted therein. Those who think that nothing that terrible happened should see how wrong they have been. Those who assume that the end of the war instantaneously brings blissful happiness and relief should realize that they are not completely right. Everyone can find something challenging in the Night, and this is why I believe everyone should become acquainted with this masterpiece and with other books on the Holocaust. Such things must not be forgotten. We should cherish what we have, and we should learn to be more humane in order not to make all those victims vain.

References

Wiesel, Elie. Night. New York: Hill and Wang, 2006. Print.

Contemplation of Indifference in Elie Wiesel’s “Night”

Elie Wiesel’s “Night” is a novel that condenses fragments of events, thoughts, and Wiesel’s analysis of the indifference the Jewish populations were subjected to. The book mainly follows Eliezer, an Orthodox Jewish teenager, and Moshe the Beadle, a caretaker of the house of prayer that Eliezer often has conversations with. The story describes the horrific events experienced on the way to the concentration camp as well as in it. The theme of disregard is especially prevalent in the interaction of the Jews on their way to the camps and those that remain in Wiesel’s native Sighet.

When the cattle cars are taking the imprisoned Jews to the camps, Mrs. Schächter screams about visible fire and is sure that they are going to die. However, she is beaten into a quietness that is described as her being “mute again, indifferent, absent” (Wiesel 28). This first experience with the unsettling apathy expresses the hopelessness and uncertainty of God that grows more noticeable further into the story.

The impassivity of those working at the camp and the officers is expressed through orders which are “words spoken quietly, indifferently, without emotion” (Wiesel 29). Similar to his other works, “Night” provides evidence for Wiesel’s primary thesis on such negligent attitudes. He firmly believes that it isn’t hatred that leads to tragedy but apathy that allows it.

There is also detachment found in the Jews that remained in their hometown when Moshe approaches them about the horrors he witnessed in the camps. They simply reply with dismissive statements such as Behind me, someone said, sighing, “What do you expect? That’s war” (Wiesel 4). Wiesel depicts a cycle of apathy expressed by the non-affected populace and the hopelessness of those that have lost everything to their attackers. He frequently cites that while insouciance may be easier to bear, it only paves the way for the abuser and never for the victim.

Work Cited

Wiesel, Elie. Night. Bantam Books, 1982.

The Relationship Between Eliezer and His Father Essay

This paper is devoted to a theme of relations between fathers and children and their transformation under extreme circumstances. It is based on the “Night” novel by Eliezer Wiesel, a Romanian-born American writer, political activist, professor, and Nobel Laureate. The book tells about the experiences in concentration camps and the relationship between Elie and his father. The essay aims to analyze the transformation of this relationship.

Change is inevitable. and the relationship between Eliezer and his father in Night drastically transforms. The young boy and his father go through much suffering in a concentration camp. Their experience at the concentration camp changes the relationship between son and father, and the despicable treatment by the Nazis helps Eliezer and his father develop a strong connection.

As the beginning of “Night”, Elie and his father’s relationship is not very good. It does not reflect a healthy connection between a father and a son. Eliezer even thinks that his father cares for other people more than his family. “He was more concerned with others than with his own family” (Wiesel 2).

Moreover, his father does not support him in his religious quest. Thus Eliezer finds Moshe, a teacher, to teach him the Cabbala something that does not go well with his father, who condemns him for his preoccupation with the Cabbala. Still, Eliezer’s relationship with his father change as their circumstances change.

Once the two are taken to a concentration camp along with many others, their relationship begins to become close. The reason for the change is the loss of the rest of their family members, and they are only left with each other. The horrendous days and the cruel treatment they receive at camp Auschwitz bring them closer as they learn to depend on one another for their mere survival.

The relationship of Elie Wiesel and his father improves drastically. They develop a close connection and support one another as they go through hard times in the camp. For example, while at the camp after his father is deemed too weak to work and taken to the side of those to go the crematorium. Eliezer runs to him, and in the confusion that ensues, both slip back to the safe side. Furthermore, his father learns to value his son and show him affection as he tells his son not to worry and go to sleep. This is seen in the following quote:“Don’t be afraid, son. Sleep—…I’ll look after you myself” (Weisel 85).

Eliezer has learned to depend on his father and will do anything to keep him by his side. He even prays to God despite his loss of faith in a God who seems quiet amid their suffering. The prisoners are going through in the camp, for the strength never to leave his father as he had sons do to their fathers.

He asks God to enable him to stay with his father because he had seen Rabbi abandon his father, “My God, Lord of the Universe, give me the strength never to do what Rabbi Eliahou’s son has done” (E.Wiesel 87). Father and son struggle to survive for the sake of one another as no one can imagine how life would change for the other if they died.

Eliezer protects and helps his father; he does not sacrifice him for his survival, as so many sons had done to their sons for their survival. However, as days pass by, he starts to feel some resentment toward his father, especially when he is unable to protect himself from the cruelty of the guards instead of pitying him.

Moreover, towards the end of the book on their way to Buchenwald, his father becomes very weak and cannot move, maybe because of fatigue or loss of hope. He leaves his father and sleeps deeply, and when he wakes up, he cannot find him and searches for him half-heartedly because a thought tells him maybe he can increase his chance of survival if he were alone.

Fortunately, he finds him, “Father! I’ve been looking for you for so long… Where were you? Did you sleep? How do you feel?” (Wiesel 101). He still cares about his father, and guilt eats him for his behavior, especially when he considers eating the food instead of sharing it with his father. Eliezer is slowly becoming estranged from his father due to the harsh situation, but he stands by his father, who suffers from dysentery.

Finally, his father passes on, and he feels a sign of relief and does not cry. However, the experience at the camp and their deep concern for one another that develops over time helps them to survive and not fall into the temptation of self-preservation that makes a son turn against his father and kill him. In summary, Elie Wiesel’s relationship with his father grows strong, albeit the former’s thoughts that he would be better off without his father as the two experience a deep bond that changes both of their lives as they struggle to survive.

Work Cited

Wiesel, Elie. . MacGibbon& Kee: New York, 1982.

Night by Ellie Wiesel

Introduction

During the Second World War, a number of scholars and writers came up with various writings to express their opinions, views, and standpoints. The Night, by Ellie Wiesel, is one such book that expresses the views of the writer.

Life was unbearable during the Second World War, particularly in Germany whereby concentration camps existed. Wiesel describes the state of affairs in the Nazi concentration camps at Auschwitz and Buchenwald.

Many people lost their lives, including property. Families broke up because family members had to be taken to different places. Others were unable to escape and found themselves in death camps whereby they could provide cheap labor without payment.

This piece of writing revisits the works of Wiesel in the book titled Night. The paper summarizes the reasoning of the writer and goes a notch higher to analyze some of the themes in order to establish the relevance of the book to the modern political environment. In other words, the paper looks at the strengths and weaknesses of the book.

Synopsis

The writer explains that life in the concentration camps was unbearable. He wonders where God was when such injustices were mated out to the Jews.

He concluded that God might have died because he could have intervened could he be alive. To the writer, life had taken a new twist meaning that the relationship between family members had changed.

The writer complained that his father had burdened him since he had to take care of him in everything. This was a great challenge to the writer given that he was only sixteen years.

In the concentration camps, family relations had no meaning. This is captured in a statement where the writer complained that if he could only eliminate his father since the old man was a form of a burden to him.

However, he regretted using such string words on his father. In the book, the writer shows that life had taken a new twist meaning that moral values were no more. In the concentration camps, there were no fathers, no brothers, and no friends.

In 1945, the writer reveals that the US liberated Buchenwald, even though it was late for his father who had already perished in the hands of Nazi.

In the introduction, the writer gives a brief description of his life (Wiesel 35) He reports that he was born in a place referred to as Sighet, which is a town situated in a hill in Hungary.

Before invasion, laws had been passed aimed at suppressing the Jews. Things got worse when Adolf and his men invaded Hungary.

Wiesel was separated from his family as his mother was taken to the gas chamber in Auschwitz and his father and he were taken to Buchenwald. The mother could not survive the conditions of Auschwitz and passed on immediately while his father died some few days before liberation.

Review/Analysis

Moshe the Beadle

The narrator tells us the importance of religion in society in this section. He claims that he cried uncontrollably when he noticed that the Temple had been vandalized. Moshe the Beadle was a man in charge of marinating the Synagogue.

In other words, he was a caretaker who ensured that everything went well during prayers. The caretaker is presented as a humble man who never quarreled with any one in society. In 1942, the man of God was whisked to Poland but he managed to come back in order to pass the information to villagers.

However, the villagers never minded listening to him. The story of Moshe the Beadle shows that a political enemy always targets the soft sport, which is normally the religious leader.

The villagers could not listen to Moshe simply because he was not influential. In the section, the government of Hungary proved that it was part of the Nazi project since it ordered all non-citizen Jews to leave.

This is one of the strengths of the book since the Holocaust could not have materialized without the help of other Eastern European governments.

The Sighet Ghettos

Jews were restricted from participating in important societal activities and enjoying their lives to the fullest. In this regard, Jews were not supposed to own property or to practice their religion.

Wherever they moved, Jews were required to wear the Yellow Star, as a form of identification. The Hungarian administration came up with a decision to transfer Jews to one of the Ghettos for easier supervision.

The Jews were only restricted to two Ghettos and the rest of their residences were closed. This shows how the Nazi regime was ambitious to control the influence of Jews in other neighboring countries.

The Jews could not influence political leaders to come up with fairer laws since their movements were easily monitored in the Ghettos. The writer reports that the Ghettos were self-contained meaning that all social services were provided.

No Jew could move out in search of a social amenity. In fact, they were allowed to appoint their councils, referred to as the Jewish Council, which could arbitrate on any issue in the ghettos This was meant to facilitate compliance since the Nazi government could easily approach the council leaders and inform them about the new developments.

After sometime, the Ghettos were closed and the Jews were transferred to the concentration camps in Poland and Germany. The writer reports that the Hungarian police had no mercy since each person was mistreated irrespective of his or her societal standing.

Auschwitz

The writer reports that he was moved to one of the concentration camps referred to as Auschwitz, together with other eighty members of his community, including Madame Schachter.

Schachter prophesized that the bodies of people were burning but the rest of the Jews could not believe her, just the way Moshe the Beadle had been ignored. People were put in different sections based on gender, age, and health.

Unfortunately, the narrator’s mother was send straight to the gas chamber owing to her old age and deteriorating health. The Auschwitz shows that political opponents will never have mercy because they will ensure that only relevant individuals are allowed to live.

The weak are eliminated immediately to avoid any costs. Children were eliminated right away since the writer reports that the lorry delivered children into a burning fire while he was watching with the father.

The political class and the politicians will never care about morality as long as their interests are well catered for by the existing policy. In the book, the main aim of the political class in Eastern Europe was to acquire wealth.

The political class never cared about the value of human life. They would allow the soldiers to strangle innocent children only to frustrate parents.

Buchenwald and Liberation

In the last section of the book, which talks about the Buchenwald camp and subsequent liberation, the writer does not explain the factors behind liberation. He simply goes ahead to describe how liberation came about but does explain the immediate and long term factors that were responsible for liberation.

In Germany, there had been some sort of resistance since some leaders wanted the government to close the concentration camps. In Europe, other world powers such as Britain and Russia had gained momentum and wanted to liberate their citizens who had been kidnapped by the Nazi regime as prisoners of war.

The writer does not explain all these factors. Furthermore, he does not give a brief explanation of how the US joined the war. There had been some developments in the international system, which could not allow Germany to continue oppressing the Jews.

In the beginning of the story, the writer explained that the old and those perceived to be unhealthy were eliminated immediately. However, he explains towards the end of the story that his father was ailing from dysentery.

The question is how comes the father was allowed to live yet it was against the policy of the Nazi government. This leaves us with some questions to answer.

Conclusion

The chapters of the book by Wiesel are arranged in a manner that would help the reader to comprehend the real meaning of Holocaust and how the Nazi unleashed terror on the Jews.

The book has some strengths including explaining how the Eastern European states contributed in implementing the Nazi policies. The Hungarian government declared that all immigrants would be deported in case they could not provide sufficient documents.

This proves that the government of Hungary knew what was just about to happen to the Jews. One weakness of the book is that it does not give authentic information.

At one moment, we are told that the old and the sick were never allowed to see the day while at other times the writer tells us that the sick could be left to suffer.

Works Cited

Wiesel, Elie. Night. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2012. Print.

Elizer’s Struggle to Keep Faith in God

Elie Wiesel wrote the book ‘Night’ to express what he experienced in prison. It gives a detailed account of a horrible holocaust. In addition, faith is prominently explored in the book. It therefore plays an important role in the development of the story. This essay focuses on how Elie’s perceptions of God change as the book develops.

At the beginning of the book, Elie had a strong belief in God. He recalled the days he studied the Talmund and went to the synagogue at night to express his disappointment after its destruction. He then requested his father to assist him to find a master who could guide him to study cabbala.

However, the father argued that Elie was not old enough to study cabbala, but on his own, Elie looked for a master known as Moche. Moche tried to find out why Elie wept when he was praying but he replied that he did not know why it happened. He however said that he did it instinctively just as he ate without being prompted to eat.

Throughout the book, Elie’s faith changed several times, something that created a major conflict. He started with a strong belief in God but later denied him. However, his faith was strengthened before he left prison. At the beginning, Elie loved God unconditionally because of his background knowledge in Jewish mysticism. He remained faithful to God during deportation of the Jews and even made a thanksgiving prayer after their safe arrival at Auschwitz.

Elie’s faith started to change for the first time when he faced the risk of being burned together with his father. That marked the beginning of his doubts about God. However, as they approached the fire, he said, “May his name be blessed and magnified…” (Wiesel 43).This was an indication that although his faith had started to change, he still had faith in God.

After Elie went to prison, it was difficult for him to sustain his belief in God in an environment that was strange. He wondered how a God who loved his people allowed them to suffer. This made him think that having faith in God was not rewarding. While at Auschwitz, Elie struggled a lot because he had a feeling of defiance towards God but his faith encouraged him not to be defiant.

His faith started to decline when he said, “Why should I bless His name? What had I to thank him for?” (Wiesel 31). Elie believed that God existed but doubted that he was just. While in prison, he had lost hope of attaining freedom. It was also during that time that he started to lose faith in God.

Elie was lonely in prison because there was neither God nor man. As a result, he felt that he had more strength than God. When he was forcefully made to witness a child who was well-liked being killed, he asked, “Where is God Now?” (Wiesel 72). He became rebellious against God during preparations of Rosh Hashanah.

He did not see the reason why he was supposed to bless a God who had allowed the burning of many children. He also wondered why God had caused his people to go through continuous suffering. Elie questioned God and his faith numerous times throughout the book. However, this did not completely break him. He was able to come out of the holocaust with a stronger faith.

Works Cited

Wiesel, Elie. Night,. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012. Print.

“Night” by Elie Wiesel and the Book of Job Comparison

To begin with, it is a universal truth that even the most righteous people sometimes suffer. Righteousness does not mean complete sinlessness but an upstanding life in the sight of God. The job was a wealthy and wise man who lost everything he had at one moment: his fortune was gone, he caught a skin disease, and his children were killed. Job’s friends tell him that sins caused his sufferings; yet, he refuses to accept it and claims that God still cares for him. For a moment, it seems like Job rejects the existence of God: “If I have sinned, what have I done to you; you who see everything we do?” (New International Version 7:20).

Regardless of how his mates tried to undermine his faith, Job remained unwavering about it. Job asked God multiple times why it all happened to him: “Your hands shaped me and made me. Will you now turn and destroy me?” (New International Version 10:8). As a consequence, Job still believes in the mightiness of God; yet, he keeps questioning why innocent people are subject to suffering even though they have never been sinful.

In Wiesel’s Night, the main character is Elie, whose religious views were transformed as he grew up. The young Jew’s faith was firm and unshakeable due to his spiritual upbringing. He claims that God surrounds people wherever they live and considers each event or phenomenon to be of His creation. However, once he was admitted to the concentration camp, he began struggling with preserving his faith. It happened because Elie could not believe God could ever allow such atrocities to take place. He even stated that “I’ve got more faith in Hitler than in anyone else. He’s the only one who’s kept his promises, all his promises, to the Jewish people” (Wiesel 50).

In general, both Job and Elie’s stories prove that there are inevitable sufferings for all people regardless of God’s graciousness. Moreover, there is a parallel in that both characters experienced the loss of religious views. From the point of view of faith, they can be considered life-changing events that are supposed to change a person’s way of thinking and strengthen their beliefs.

Works Cited

New International Version. BibleGateaway, 2011. Web.

Wiesel, Elie. Night. Macmillan Publishers Limited, 1956.

Conceptual Inconsistency in “Night” by Elie Wiesel

Introduction

For people who have not been completely deprived of their ability to utilize their sense of logic, as a result of being continuously brainwashed by hawks of political correctness, it does not make a whole lot of sense that – the further we are from the time of WW2, the more there emerge “holocaust survivors”, who demand monetary compensations for their “suffering”, even though that it should be other way around. Elie Wiesel, who is being often referred to as “Pope of Holocaust religion”, is a good example of such “survivor”. He was able to become an immensely wealthy individual with the mean of telling horror stories about babies being dumped into fire pits by truckloads. The fact that the critical examination of Wiesel’s outrageous claims is actually punishable by law in such countries as Germany, France and Britain, allowed this “talented and sensitive Jew” to make a good business on spreading lies about WW2, while charging $25.000 per lecture on the subject of Holocaust in colleges and universities. In 1986, Wiesel was awarded a Nobel Prize for his contribution into “revealing the truth about Holocaust”, even though that neither of his claims was being confirmed independently. He was the one who continued to talk about Nazis making soap out of Jews, well after American and British authorities had admitted that the stories of “Jewish soap” were nothing a part of Allied war-propaganda. Yet, despite the fact that there is a plenty of evidence that points out at Wiesel as false witness, his book “Night” is still being considered as an absolutely credible witness account of what happened to Jews during the WW2, simply because the issue of Holocaust has long ago turned into one of the most lucrative businesses, along with drug trafficking and arms trade. Due to the fact that examining holocaust now represents a criminal offence, in countries where hook-nosed descendants of Bolshevik commissars succeeded in instilling citizens with the sense of “historical guilt”, countless “holocaust survivors” are now allowed to extort money from Swiss banks in broad daylight, to establish “museums of Holocaust”, where visitors are being charged $50 per person, and to hold lectures across the country, during the course of which they teach White people how to be ashamed of their own cultural heritage.

“A Prominent False Witness: Elie Wiesel”

In his article “A Prominent False Witness: Elie Wiesel”, Robert Faurisson provides us with numerous examples of conceptual inconsistency of Wiesel’s claims, which brings author to conclusion that Wiesel is nothing but swindler who should be held accountable for spreading lies: “Elie Wiesel passes for one of the most celebrated eyewitnesses to the alleged Holocaust. He claims to have witnessed Jews being burned alive, a story now dismissed by all historians. Wiesel gives credence to the most absurd stories of other “eyewitnesses.” He spreads fantastic tales of 10,000 persons sent to their deaths each day in Buchenwald” (Faurisson, 2002). While seeming to never get tired of whining about cruel Nazis, who strived to “exterminate Jews en masse” (which nevertheless did not prevent him from leaving the camp with retreating German “monsters”, instead of waiting for Soviet “liberators”), Wiesel denies the very possibility that it was not only the Jews that suffered during the course WW2. He also refers to an artificial Ukrainian famine of 1933, which was organized by Jewish commissars and which resulted in death of 10 millions of Ukrainians from starvation, as “fascist myth”, simply because Jews consider “Holocaust religion” as exclusively their “intellectual property”.

Is Wiesel a crook?

Nowadays, it became a statement of good taste to refer to Wiesel’s “Night” as such that provides us with the insight on what constitutes the essence of human cruelty. For example, in his article “The Ethics of Reading Elie Wiesel’s ‘Night””, Daniel R. Schwarz suggests that Wiesel’s “masterpiece” contains moral implications of global magnitude. While discussing the significance of character of Moshe the Beadle, Schwarz states: “Implicitly, he (Wiesel) is urging us that it is our ethical responsibility not to turn away from the Witnessing Voice – Moshe, himself, indeed all those who have seen, specifically, the Holocaust, and metonymically, for us, man’s inhumanity to man – whether it occurs in Bosnia, Northern Ireland, or Somalia” (Schwartz, 1998). This betrays Scwartz as truly naïve person, because Jews had always claimed that “Holocaust” cannot be compared to acts of genocide committed against “goims”. After all, “goims” translates as “cattle”. Jews feel themselves at liberty to kill Palestinian children as “terrorists”, to kidnap and to murder their opponents in foreign countries, to have sexual slavery officially legalized in Israel – yet, they scream “bloody murder” when people criticize Israeli’s genocidal policies. This is why Wiesel’s “horror story” needs to be taken with a grain of salt, as even if there was no Holocaust, it would have to be invented, as it effectively entitles Jews with the status of “holy cows”, whose actions cannot be criticized, no matter what.

“Never shall I forget that night, the first night in camp, which has turned my life into one long night, seven times cursed and seven times sealed. Never shall I forget that smoke. Never shall I forget the little faces of the children, whose bodies I saw turned into wreaths of smoke beneath a silent blue sky” – says Wiesel, without bothering to specify the factual details of his “eyewitness account”. The reason is simple – there is not even a single evidence as to the fact that Germans were actually gassing Jews (not to say burning them in open fire pits, which is simply impossible physically), except for contradictory accounts, on the part of such “trustworthy” survivors as Wiesel. Readers are simply expected to “swallow” Wiesel’s lies unquestionably, so that they would be more willing to open up their wallets, while being approached by “chosen people” with demands of monetary compensation for “historical injustice”. Therefore, we can only agree with Eric Hunt, who in his article “Elie Wiesel and the ‘Big Lie’” suggests that the fact that many people consider criticising Wiesel’s claims as something inappropriate, can be thought of as an indication that “there is something rotten in the state of Denmark”: “Wiesel is considered by many dissidents to be the biggest fraud in the entire holocaust industry, and the more attention is drawn to the fictional nature of his supposedly ‘non-fictional writings, the better. The fact that many people immediately consider doing so to be anti-Semitic is only proof of the degree to which Western societies have been brainwashed” (Hunt, 2007).

Conclusion

There can be no doubt that Wiesel did suffer from Nazi’s cruelty, as they had issued him with the shovel and told him to do something useful, for a change, which prevented him and his brethren from indulging in shady commercial activities as their full-time occupation. It is quite understandable that Jews consider themselves as being so much above performing physical labour, because of their “existential sophistication”. However, this does not give them a right to mislead people on the subject of what happened to “chosen people” during WW2. “Survivors” like Wiesel do their best to convince people to think of anti-Semitism as having purely irrational essence. They blame just about everyone for Jewish misfortunes, except for Jews themselves, while being unable to learn from the lessons of history. However, as we all are aware of – those who do not learn from their own mistakes are bound to repeat them over and over. We do not argue Wiesel’s right to relate his “memories” to readers openly, just as we do not doubt our right to think of “Night” as what it really is – a fictional horror story, created by mentally and physically inadequate person, who was able to able to utilize his readers’ naivety for the purpose of making huge commercial profits.

Bibliography

Faurisson, Robert “A Prominent False Witness: Elie Wiesel”. 2002. . 2008. Web.

Hunt, Eric “‘”. 2007. City Belt. Hudson County’s Independent Weekly. 2008. Web.

Schwarz, Daniel “The Ethics of Reading Elie Wiesel’s ‘Night’”. 1998. Bnet Business Network. 2008. Web.

Wiesel, Elie “Night”. New York: Bantam, 1982.

The Book “Night” by Elie Wiesel

Introduction

The book Night by Elie Wiesel focuses on religious faith, a significant issue in society. It was published in 1960 and has been translated into various languages. Eliezer is the narrator in the tale and experiences multiple challenges throughout the story. The most significant issue involves his struggle with faith depicting how the loss of religious belief impacts individuals in the community. The world is diverse, and societies have different beliefs and values. Consequently, Wiesel used the narrative to show how one’s life can be affected by religion. Faith, guilt and inaction, and inhumanity are some of the narratives themes that readers can analyze when focusing on the various issues addressed in the story.

Main Idea in the Book

The main idea in the text involves faith, which Eliezer primarily depicts. At the beginning of the narrative, he prays at night in the synagogue until Eliezer is overwhelmed with religious feelings. Moreover, the narrator is attracted to Jewish mysticism and wants to study Kabbalah to learn more about the religion (Wiesel 5). However, his father prevents him from engaging in the studies since he is young. His experiences in the camps of Birkenau-Auschwitz affect Eliezer’s beliefs in God. Many people die and starve, causing him to conclude that God does not exist (Wiesel 62). Therefore, the audience can learn that the main idea entails how life experiences impact one’s religious faith and relationship with the Creator.

Developing the Analysis

Inhumanity has been incorporated in Wiesel’s book to ensure that the audience can understand how communities impacts people’s life. For instance, the German government and society redefined Jews as creatures who do not have a right to live (Wiesel 54). Another issue that shows inhumanity is when other patients beat Eliezer’s father in his sickbed because he smells bad (Wiesel 63). Guilt and inaction is also a theme used by Wiesel in the book. For example, Eliezer watches defencelessly as his father is beaten several times at night. Thus, Eliezer has the feeling of guilt since he does not show an act of resistance. The imprisoned community also feels weak and malnourished when surrounded by soldiers with machine guns. The prisoners’ options are limited since any resistance can lead to their deaths and torture. Thus, these scenes show that inhumanity and guilt and inaction are some concepts in the book.

Personal Evaluation

Authors exercise different techniques to ensure that the audience can understand their message. Wiesel is also persuasive since he has used convincing language to create scenes that readers can analyze and learn the story’s moral lesson. Moreover, the use of religion is essential in the book since many people experience the challenges encountered by characters in the story. The narraive is also fascinating, which is a necessary aspect of literature. It enables people to read a particular text to the end to learn what happened in the conclusion. Consequently, these aspects can be used to reveal that Wiesel is persuasive.

What strikes me most in this week’s readings involves the techniques used in narratives. The various texts I have come across have used different approaches to attract more readers and ensure that the message is conveyed effectively. I have also learned the importance of ensuring that the audience can comprehend the story’s moral lesson. Therefore, these factors have been significant to me since I can read various texts and analyze how authors have used considerable writing skills. The question that I would pursue in the class discussion is; What are the significant elements that one can consider when writing both fictional and non-fictional stories?

Work Cited

Wiesel, Elie. Hill and Wang, 2006.