You must identify a domestic pre-9/11 terrorist event and a domestic post-9/11 t

You must identify a domestic pre-9/11 terrorist event and a domestic post-9/11 t

You must identify a domestic pre-9/11 terrorist event and a domestic post-9/11 terrorist event that wil be the focus of your
research paper. Note: The two terrorist events that are selected must have occurred at least 5 years apart.
In Unit VI, submit your research paper on your chosen domestic pre- and post-9/11 terrorist event. The research paper
must be written using the folowing outline structure:
1. Title page
2. Introduction: In this section, identify the two terrorist events that have been previously selected, and briefly explain why
these events serve as good comparison points for evaluating how terrorist activities have evolved over time.
3. Pre-9/11 terrorist event: In this section, describe the first terrorist event that is being used for comparison. The
descriiption of this terrorist event must include the nature of the event, methods used by the terrorists, and eventual
outcome of the event.
4. Post-9/11 terrorist event: In this section, describe the second terrorist event that is being used for comparison. The
descriiption of this terrorist event must include the nature of the event, methods used by the terrorists, and eventual
outcome of the event.
5. Terrorist events comparison: In this section, compare and contrast the two terrorist events that were described in the
previous sections. Suggested areas for comparison include (1) motivations for attacks, (2) methods of attack, (3)
impact on society, and (4) lessons learned from attacks that can be used to develop counterterrorist strategies. You
should also discuss how terrorist strategies have evolved from the first event to the second event.
6. Discuss how Geospatial Information Systems (GIS) and other technology can be used to prevent future similar
attacks
7. Summary and conclusions: In this section, summarize the evolution of terrorism based upon the two selected events.
8. References: Provide a reference list.
While the level of detail in each section of the research paper wil vary, it is expected that the final paper wil be at least three
pages in length, not counting the title and reference pages.
Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for al sources that are
used. Please note that no abstract is needed.
T

Name: Spc Hofmann, Igor Born and adopted from Moscow, Russia to Oxford,Ohio Ba

Name: Spc Hofmann, Igor
Born and adopted from Moscow, Russia to Oxford,Ohio
Ba

Name: Spc Hofmann, Igor
Born and adopted from Moscow, Russia to Oxford,Ohio
Basic Training: Fort Jackson, South Carolina
Advanced Individual Training: Fort Lee, VA
Mos: 91C Utilities Equipment Repairer (cross trained on working on generators as well)
First Duty Station: 25ID CAB 209th HSC
Earned and attended:Norwegian Ruck March
Responsibilities: Alternative safety officer of 209th Motorpool
Short Term Goals: complete associates degree for cyber security from Hawaii Pacific University. Military short term goal attending BLC and train and develop elite soldiers
Long Term Goal: Obtaining a bachelors degree in nursing and Commission.
If anything else need please let me know

You will describe in 500 words, in current Turabian format, the geographical ele

You will describe in 500 words, in current Turabian format, the geographical ele

You will describe in 500 words, in current Turabian format, the geographical elements of a classical battle and how it affected the warfare approach due to the geographical conditions.
TOPIC: Battle of Gaugamela in 331 BC, part of the larger campaign between Alexander the Great of Macedonia and Darius III of Persia.
Your paper must meet the following criteria:
• A clear thesis that answers a historically significant question(s).
• A strong narrative supported by evidence in a systematic manner to support the thesis. Remember to use strong transitional devices between sections of the paper and frequently remind readers how each array of evidence supports the thesis.
• Significant engagement with professional interpretations of the background or specific topic you researched.
• Written in the active voice, past tense. Use block quotations only sparingly, if at all. Always integrate quotations into your own words rather than use them as independent sentences. Cite your evidence often.
• The Department of History requires that students use the Turabian Notes – Bibliography citation style. You must use footnotes with the Turabian footnote citation style within the paper. Then, you must use the bibliographic format you practiced in this course for the final bibliography.
Note: This assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Below are the key points to cover with. 1. SITUATION: a. Defined the area of op

Below are the key points to cover with.
1. SITUATION:
a. Defined the area of op

Below are the key points to cover with.
1. SITUATION:
a. Defined the area of operations for battle.
b. Performed terrain assessment using OAKOC.
c. Provided comparison of opposing forces:
(1) Doctrine.
(2) Training.
(3) Leader Development.
(4) Organizations and Materials.
(5) Soldiers.
d. Provide background information:
(6) Strategic setting.
(7) operational setting
f. Provided chronology showing key events.
2. MISSION:
(1) Indicated the initial plans and dispositions:
(a) Friendly forces.
(b) Opposing forces.
3. EXECUTION:
a. Described in sequence principal events.
b. Indicated losses incurred by both sides.
c. General outcome of the battle.
d. Indicated lessons learned.
e. Provided insights based upon analysis.
f. Identified applicable Six Warfighting Functions and linked to specific events and/or people.
4. SERVICE SUPPORT:
Cause and effect of tactical events.
(i.e., impact of ammunition supply exhaustion)
5. COMMAND AND SIGNAL:
a. Identified battle name.
b. Identified names of opposing commanders.
c. Identified names of opposing armies. (i.e., Army of Ohio, NOT Union Army)
d. Identified date(s) of battle?
6. EVALUATE SOURCES:
a. Used 3 or more sources.
b. For each source:
(1) Evaluated suitability (tactics, technology).
(2) Evaluated authenticity.
(3) Evaluated reliability.
reference
read://https_www.nam.ac.uk/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nam.ac.uk%2Fexplore%2Fmarket-garden

Provide a substantive post summarizing the role of Sergeants Major in training a

Provide a substantive post summarizing the role of Sergeants Major in training a

Provide a substantive post summarizing the role of Sergeants Major in training and at least three examples of how you will best implement the Army’s principles of unit training and leader development. minimum of 300-word and no more than 500-word substantive post.

Analyze and evaluate the major points of “Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan: A C

Analyze and evaluate the major points of “Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan: A C

Analyze and evaluate the major points of “Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan: A Case Study of Adaptation in Battle” for research utilizing the principles of mission command. Give an in-depth introduction of your topic, then develop the body of the paper fully using not less than three full pages and no more than five pages. Provide transitional sentences from one topic to the next.

Provide advantage and disadvantage of the COA. Provide rationale for the decisio

Provide advantage and disadvantage of the COA. Provide rationale for the decisio

Provide advantage and disadvantage of the COA. Provide rationale for the decision.
Below are some additional information for the COA. However review the attachment as well.
I have 2x significant concerns after updating our COA 1 products based on our WG results:
The MLR CO’s primary concern, for both WG worksheet 1 and worksheet 2, is our ability to effectively guard in LOA Silver with a single LRUSV platoon.
I do not see how we addressed this concern in the WG. There are no changes to the T/O, nor do I see any resources being reappropriated to the ME or an explanation that would otherwise address the CO’s concern.
I think not addressing the Type 93 is a ‘miss’ on our end.
Rationale: The MLR is tasked with denying the Venturan Carib Command use of the sea and airspace in LOA Silver Center Sector and LOA Gold.
My interpretation is that this applies to an enemy submarine in either sector whether we have the organic capability to detect and target a submersible or not.
Per the 10th MLR CO’s Orientation and Initial Intent: “Our 3x LRUSV platoons and 2x NMESIS platoons provide us with our organic offensive capability, but we don’t have enough of either to maximize effectiveness without careful integration with external ISR (e.g., P-8A, MQ-9) and C2 capabilities (e.g. E-2C).”
Barring any objections, I will include the following updated EFSTs, that integrate the P-8A IOT address the Type 93 threat, in the final draft after I receive everyone’s feedback when week 14 kicks off in January.
EFST 1
Task. Limit TF1/Carib Command FFG/DDG/Type 22 FA/Type 93 ability to maneuver in LRUSV Engagement Areas in LOA Silver and LOA Gold.
Purpose. To create opportunity for TF Silver (ME), TF Gold-North (SE1), and TF Gold-South (SE2) to mass LRUSV Hero-120 anti-ship munitions.
Method
Priority: POF CTF 40 F-18 & EA-18 sorties and TF 44 P-8A to the ME.
Allocation: Priority ME LRUSV Plt/ Alt: SE1 LRUSV Plt
Restrictions: None.
Effects. TF1/Carib Command FFG/DDG/Type 22 FA/Type 93 suppressed and unable to maneuver in LOA Silver and LOA Gold.
o
EFST 2
Task: Delay TF1/Carib Command FFG/DDG/Type 22 FA/Type 93 ability to transit through NMESIS Engagement Areas in LOA Silver and LOA Gold.
Purpose: To allow TF Silver (ME), TF North (SE1), and TF South (SE2) to engage Carib Command surface combatants with NMESIS anti-ship missiles.
Method
Priority: POF CTF 40 F-18 & EA-18 sorties and TF 44 P-8A to the ME.
Allocation: Pri: ME LRUSV Plt/Alt: SE1 LRUSV Plt
Restriction: None.
Effects: TF1/Carib Command FFG/DDG/Type 22 FA/Type 93 suppressed and unable to maneuver in LOA Silver and LOA Gold.

As a minimum, the essay must cover the following points: a. The context of the c

As a minimum, the essay must cover the following points:
a. The context of the c

As a minimum, the essay must cover the following points:
a. The context of the current criticism of the existing DOM.
b. The strengths and weaknesses of the DOM with respect to military capability.
c. Key recommendations and suggested improvements to the DOM.
The Essay should evaluate the existing model, consider amendments and/or alternatives, with justification. It must include:
o The context of the current criticism of the existing DOM (Why now?).
o The strengths and weaknesses of the DOM with respect to military capability (What
now?).
o Key recommendations and suggested improvements to the DOM (What next?).
o If possible to learn from elsewhere, Saudi Arabia in particular as they are currently doing MoD transformation, cite it as a best practice then please do.
Here are references that might help you with the task :
OBE, Air Commodore (Ret’d) Andrew Curtis. “Is Defence’s Latest Operating Model Fit for Purpose?” RUSI, 24 November 2020https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/defences-latest-operating-model-fit-purpose.
OBE, Trevor Taylor and Air Commodore (Ret’d) Andrew Curtis. “Management of Defence after the Levene Reforms: What Comes Next?” RUSI, 9 September 2020https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/occasional-papers/management-defence-after-levene-reforms-what-comes-next.
https://mod.gov.sa/en/DevelopmentProgram/Pages/OrganizationalChart.aspx
https://www.gami.gov.sa/sites/default/files/2023-03/GAMI%20H1-2021-ENG_0.pdf

Assignment Instructions1: Post a substantial initial response, with at least one

Assignment Instructions1: Post a substantial initial response, with at least one

Assignment Instructions1: Post a substantial initial response, with at least one (1) cited source from your required readings and a minimum of 250 words, to the topic below. Identify references following the post using APA format.
Assignment Instructions1: Additionally, write two responses that can be posted to classmates on the same subject area, with at least one (1) cited source from your required readings. Each reply post must have a minimum of 150 words for full participation credit.
As a CSM/ SGM, you must aid the commander in identifying, correcting, and preventing organizational stressors within your unit. Stressors become training distractions and can be from both internal and external sources to the unit. Creating and implementing controls for stressors will affect unit engagement and reduce training distractions
Topic to write about: Analyze the concepts and theories you read about; utilizing key language and terms from these concepts and theories, discuss what control(s) a CSM/ SGM can implement to prevent or balance internally induced operational stress in a garrison environment (L211). In your initial post, include a discussion of what effects your chosen control(s) will have on one of the seven principles of mission command within your unit (L301).

In 250 words or more answer the question below AND reply to at least two other s

In 250 words or more answer the question below AND reply to at least two other s

In 250 words or more answer the question below AND reply to at least two other student’s post substantively by Sunday of each week. Discussion posts, moving forward, is to elicit conversation.
How has Five Eyes been pivotal to effective SIGINT operations?