OVERVIEW This is mock contingency plan presentation. The goal is exhibit unders

OVERVIEW
This is mock contingency plan presentation. The goal is exhibit unders

OVERVIEW
This is mock contingency plan presentation. The goal is exhibit understanding of warfare in the Greater Middle East.
TOPIC: The local military power check of Iran and Iraq has been diminished due to U.S. involvement in the Middle East over the last decade and with the impending U.S. withdraw from the region, Iran has no military power keeping it in check. With this new opportunity Iran turns its attention on Israel, the remaining western presence in the region.
Create a mock contingency plan briefing as a member of the Israel Defense Force. This contingency briefing is for a potential conflict that could ensue with Iran. Research from reputiable and scholary sites to create a contingency plan briefing using historical middle east examples from ancient to contemporary to back your claims.
Create a contingency plan briefing document that’s easy to read (main), well designed, have visual aids, the assignment is to show the main elements of warfare in Greater Middle East. Using the headings below show how each element would play into conflict between Israel and Iran.
Notes pages will provide all details an context to support each slide. Notes pages for each slide will be indepth in order to define the objective of each slide
• Conflict Summary slide
o explain METT-TC (Mission, Enemy, Terrain, Troops and Time available and civilian considerations)
o show the elements shaping the Operational environment through PMESII-PT (Politics-Military-Economics-Social-Information-Infrastructure.
• Geographic Elements slide
o o evaluate the major geographic and environmental elements that factor into the conflict of the potential battlefield(s).
o describe various domains, cyber, air, sea etc that are a factor.
• Technological Elements slide
o evaluate the technological advantage and disadvantages of each player.
• Intelligence Resources slide
o explain the potential intelligence (Cyber, Human, etc.) elements that would factor into the conflict.
o showing Iranian center of gravity and critical factors analysis
• Cultural Analysis slide
o analysis the cultural differences and the factors that they play in this conflict.
• Outcome slide
o Using the analysis from the contingency plan summarize the potential outcome(s) of the objectives.
• Bibliography (1 slide Turabin format)
o All sources used for the briefing.
Each presentation should be:
• Easy to Read
o Meaning that only main topics and information should be in the presentation and the bulk of the information should be in your presentation of the briefing document
• Visual Aids,
o Each area of the briefing should have a visual aid and help the view understand the concepts being discussed.
Note: This assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

A thought-provoking paper in the journal Science deemed humans as super-predator

A thought-provoking paper in the journal Science deemed humans as super-predator

A thought-provoking paper in the journal Science deemed humans as super-predators with the power to alter ecological and evolution process on a global scale (Darimont et al., 2015). What qualities would you think make humans a super-predator? From what you have learned in this unit, and your personal experience or research, refute or accept this claim. Please provide some specific examples.
You can view the Science paper in the CSU Online Library using the link below:
Darimont, C. T., Fox, C. H., Bryan, H. M., & Reimchen, T. E. (2015). The unique ecology of human predators. Science. https://discovery-ebsco-com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/c/iuzu2i/viewer/pdf/obhlvutgov.
Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

5 paragraphs no longer than 3 pages APA format with title and reference page. Yo

5 paragraphs no longer than 3 pages APA format with title and reference page. Yo

5 paragraphs no longer than 3 pages APA format with title and reference page. You can see more details in the Persuasive Essay Handout and other attached documents. Thank you for your assistance.

Read the case study handout titled, “History of the NCO 1700: Valley Forge.” Pic

Read the case study handout titled, “History of the NCO 1700: Valley Forge.” Pic

Read the case study handout titled, “History of the NCO 1700: Valley Forge.” Pick two issues from the list below to discuss in the case study analysis. Write a 500 word analysis using only section 4 (Proposed Solutions) and section 5 (Rrecommendations) on implementation of the case study format outline. YOU DO NOT NEED TO DO SECTIONS 1 – 3 or 6. Include a minimum of ONE APA formatted reference and one in-text citation with quote to support your post (use reference(s) outside the Research and Case Studies Lesson). Be sure to cover both issues in each paragraph.
The lack of standardized drills and maneuvers
The poor supply acquisition process
The lack of policies/procedures that were in place
The poor camp layout and sanitation plan
Sickness and disease
Low morale and desertion
All submissions must be uploaded as a .docx MS Word format with 7th APA title page, reference page, and formatting. No other formats will be accepted.
Case Study Format Outline:
Section 4: Proposed Solutions (Proposed Course of Action (Solution) (one or two, may have sub components)
Section 5: Recommendations (Determine and discuss specific strategies for accomplishing the proposed solution. If applicable, recommend further action to resolve some of the issues. What should be done and who should do it?)
https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/writing-case-study-analysis

write a 1000-1200 word essay: attached: Draft, which needs to be plagrism free

write a 1000-1200 word essay:
attached:
Draft, which needs to be plagrism free

write a 1000-1200 word essay:
attached:
Draft, which needs to be plagrism free (,) are place holders for references/citations.
Instructions+rubric
Notes:
“Combined Arms” is a military approach which seeks to integrate different branches of a military to achieve mutually complementary effects. For instance, infantry and armor divisions are combined in a way that maximizes their strengths and minimizes their weaknesses. The concept became particularly prominent during World War II.
Battle of Stalingrad (1942-1943): Although perhaps not a classic example of combined arms as it’s often understood today (integration of infantry, armor, and artillery), Stalingrad shows the important interaction between the strategic and tactical, with both sides using their forces in combination for different aims. The Luftwaffe (German Air Force) was used to bombard the city, while the infantry and armor units were fighting in close quarters in the city itself. In response, the Soviets launched Operation Uranus, a two-pronged attack that targeted the weaker Romanian and Hungarian forces protecting the German 6th Army’s flanks.

The purpose of this assignment is to prepare a paper for the Combatant Commander

The purpose of this assignment is to prepare a paper for the Combatant Commander

The purpose of this assignment is to prepare a paper for the Combatant Commander to use in testimony before congressional committees and in meetings in Washington regarding Kaliningrad using the Strategic Estimate for the Baltic Region. This paper replicates a typical action officer dilemma of having too much information to fit into the confines of the required format.

During World War II the United States Military nontraditional interrogation tact

During World War II the United States Military nontraditional interrogation tact

During World War II the United States Military nontraditional interrogation tactics with captured POW’s helped them gain the advantage and win the war
paper word-count is a minimum of 2500 words and no more than 2750 words
References
The History of Camp Tracy: Japanese WWII POWs and the Future of Strategic
Interrogation by Alexander D. Corbin 2009
History of Byron Hot Springs by Carol A. Jensen
The History of MIS-Y: U.S. Strategic Interrogation During the War (World War II)
by Joint Military Intelligence College
Madmen led the Blind: Memoirs of an SS Obersturmführer: Battles on the Western Front and Interrogations by Intelligence at the Prisoner-of-War camp Fort Hunt
by Herwig Salmutter August 10, 2022
POWs and Intel at Fort Hunt in World War II
https://www.nps.gov/articles/forthuntww2.htm
Nazis on the Potomac: The Top-Secret Intelligence Operation that Helped Win World War II By Robert K. Sutton
The Secrets of P.O. Box 1142 by National Park Service, 2009
Secret War at Home, The Pine Grove Furnace Prisoner of War Interrogation Camp
By John Paul Bland, Cumberland County Historical Society, Foreword by Rick Atkinson 2006
INTERROGATION CENTERS FOR THE INTERROGATION OF WAR PRISONERS
https://www.uboatarchive.net/POW/POWInterrogationCenters.htm
INTERROGATION OF JAPANESE POWS IN WWII: U.S. RESPONSE TO A FORMIDABLE CHALLENGE
James A. Stone Captain, USAF NDIC Class 2007
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/FOIA/DF-2023-00192-Encl-2.pdf

Please use the 2 commanders guidance documents attached and also the instruction

Please use the 2 commanders guidance documents attached and also the instruction

Please use the 2 commanders guidance documents attached and also the instructions to ensure the paper meets the standards.
PLEASE ADD 2 INTEXT CITATIONS so THAT I HAVE 3 total PLEASE PLEASE

Choose military campaigns listed below. Write a narrative that recounts the basi

Choose military campaigns listed below. Write a narrative that recounts the basi

Choose military campaigns listed below. Write a narrative that recounts the basic events of the campaign, analyzes its strategic goals and assesses its success or failure, with an emphasis on sustainability or lack thereof (e.g. overextended supply lines, geographical and weather considerations, etc.) Ground this work in strategy, with tactical considerations being limited and discussed only to the extent necessary. Develop the content of this assignment with the goals of the nation-state in mind, not those of its military forces. This is an analytical work and your thesis statement should be analytical in nature. The Campaign Analysis Paper assesses the students’ mastery of course outcome 1 (CO1) – Analyze the strategic elements of significant military campaigns.
Topics
Julius Caesar’s campaign in Gaul (58-50 BCE)
Format Requirements
Length: 6-8 pages (1500 to 2000 words). Your paper should be not less than 1500 words exclusive of title page, bibliography, etc. Upper word limit may be exceeded with the permission of the instructor.
Use Common Era style abbreviations (BCE – Before Common Era, CE – Common Era). This is necessary only when referring to events of the ancient world (before or near the year 0). Examples:
The assassination of Julius Caesar occurred in 44 BCE.
The Great Fire of Rome occurred in 64 CE.

Thesis Statement: Employ an analytical thesis statement, which should appear in the first two paragraphs of your paper. An analytical paper breaks down an issue or an idea into its component parts, evaluates the issue or idea, and presents this breakdown and evaluation to the audience.
Content: This is a relatively short work. Consider how best to use your available space. Briefly introduce the topic, identify your thesis statement, and ground the work in the events of the actual campaign you have chosen. You do not have the time or word count to indulge in a lengthy discourse of events leading to the campaign. In this assignment, you are to strike a balance between a narrative that tells the “story” and analysis of those events. The words in this analytical work should be largely your own. Keep direct citations of source material to two sentences or less and avoid lengthy quotations.
Structure: Consult the Writing Guides for APA (see below) to write a paper with a clear introduction, body and conclusion.
Despite the use of APA, do not write an abstract.
Include a title page.
Use a 12 point conventional (Times New Roman, Calibri, etc.) font, double spaced with a 1 inch margin.
Annotated Bibliography: Include an annotated bibliography with a minimum of three scholarly books. Please ensure you understand the difference between an annotated bibliography and a list of references. Annotations, as with the rest of the paper, must be written in your own words. There is a link below to the online writing laboratory if you need assistance writing an annotated bibliography. Construct your annotated bibliography using research from legitimate, academic sources of history. Practically speaking, this means books and academic journals. Do not use materials from non-academic sources – history.com, online encyclopedias, etc. Research is a vital component of this assignment. Do not use any required readings for this course as source material for your paper. Suggested readings from the course may be used.