Category: Military science

Examine how and why politics and technology has changed the character of war (pa

Examine how and why politics and technology has changed the character of war (particularly the character of battlefields) in a specific conflict. My conflict is the war on terror.
This is the info dump + outline:
Central research problem:
How did the war on terror impact the character of war? A case analysis of the technological impact,
political dynamics, and transformation of warfare.
Aim of research:
To explore the impact of politics and technologies on the character of war and the transformation from conventional battlefield to cyber warfare and the use of unmanned systems.
Sub Questions:
What role did Media warfare play in the war on terror?
Why is it important? Because the war on terror is a crucial turning point in how states view and combat terrorism.
The use of advanced technologies such as unmanned drones to conduct targeted assassinations has caused significant legal/ethical issues (sovereignty, civilian causality, legality of drone strikes/surveillance).
We could identify the different factors that have led to the major change in the character of war, this would help us in determining the trend in which warfare is moving towards. This would allow us to predict and interpret different aspects of war’s character.
Topics:
Autonomous weapons
Precision-guided weapons
Information technology
Stealth technology
What you have to do:
understanding of how technology and politics interact to change the character of war, with sophisticated insights into their complex dynamics.
critical analysis of specific examples where technology and politics have shaped modern warfare, supported by detailed evidence
Introduction -350-400:
Origin of the conflict and historical context
Importance of politics and technology and their impact on shaping the nature of the conflict
Body 1 -700-800:
Analysis of political framework surrounding the conflict (alliances / tensions).
How did political strategies influence military tactics and strategies?
how political factors shape technological development in the military sector.
Body 2 – Done by antoher member but to be considered as transitions from/too:
How did technology interact with politics to impact the character of war?
Autonomous weapons / Precision-guided weapons / information warfare / stealth technology
How technological innovations influence political decision-making in matters of war?
Body 3 -700-800:
The transformation from conventional warfare to unconventional and technology driven
Rise of unmanned systems
Conclusion -350-400:
Summary of key findings and analysis that were mentioned before.
Assume that body 2 will be writen by somtone else, do the intro body 1,3 and the conclusion.

3 page paper that analyzes the Battel of Dak To in the Vietnam War

I need a 3 page paper that analyzes the Battel of Dak To in the Vietnam War. See the attached document for details on how to structure this.

Develop a 1550-1700 word document where you address each of the following tasks.While discrete, these tasks are part of a continuous process and need to be coherent and continue the logic and rationale presented in previous tasks.

Using the attached background information, develop a 1550-1700 word document where you address each of the following tasks. While discrete, these tasks are part of a continuous process and need to be coherent and continue the logic and rationale presented in previous tasks. Ensure you clearly label each section with the respective task title to indicate your responses to each distinct question. The document should encompass your detailed responses to all the following tasks:
COG IDENTIFICATION: Identify the operational-level Center of Gravity (COG) for Caprica. Provide rationale for your selection, then conduct a critical factor analysis (CFA) for the COG you identified. From this CFA, provide one critical capability, two critical requirements, and two critical vulnerabilities, as well as a brief explanation for the derivation of these factors for each COG. (450-550 words).
COA DEVELOPMENT: Develop and describe one Course of Action (COA) that is distinguishable from both the two COAs provided in the Staff Estimate. (150-250 words).
COA VALIDITY: Conduct a doctrinal validity test on the COA you developed and describe your results (400-450 words). Remember the ultimate goal of COA validity is to determine whether COAs are appropriate for presentation to CCDR.
COA COMPARISON: Using the five evaluation criteria provided in paragraph 3 of the Staff Estimate of the Situation, conduct a
COA Comparison between the COA you developed and any one of the given COAs. You may use any format you choose (including the sample decision matrix found earlier in this lesson). Explain your methodology and your results (450-550 words).
Use all the attached for references, including JP 3-0 and 5-0, or additional references can be added.

Standard: Preparation includes an analytical essay with a minimum of three pages

Standard: Preparation includes an analytical essay with a minimum of three pages, no more than five pages, using the six principles of mission command to appraise the Operation Anaconda Case Study IAW the APA Writing Style. (Army) Analytical Essay

This assignment should list all the resources you intend to use in your project

This assignment should list all the resources you intend to use in your project (7-10 minimum). Include the correct and complete citation and a brief descriiption of each resource. I have attached two documents related to this current assignment, which will all come together for the research paper in week 08. Thanks

Research paper that includes an introduction, literature review, theoretical fra

Research paper that includes an introduction, literature review, theoretical framework, research design / methodology, findings, discussion, conclusion, and reference list.

Write a well researched paper utilizing historical references on the importance of the chain of command

Write a well researched paper utilizing historical references on the importance of the chain of command, subordination and respect within military ranks. Include a cover sheet and reference page

Develop a clear roadmap that identifies tasks to accomplish every week.

Develop a clear roadmap that identifies tasks to accomplish every week. A clear roadmap helps you get where you want to go! Here is a generic plan to use as a guide.

PROFESSIONAL MILITARY SUBJECT ESSAY*
Q1: “How can you change a culture of substa

PROFESSIONAL MILITARY SUBJECT ESSAY*
Q1: “How can you change a culture of substandard behavior, lack of
standards, and mediocre discipline initiative?”
(1) You will write a two-page (maximum) essay addressing a commandant-selected protessional
milltary subject from the perspective of a corporalsergeant (team leaden). The winner wil be
selected by the commandant and recognized with a certrficate of achievement and colin during
graduation. The recipient of the Commandant’ s Writing Award will have the award annotatea on
their DA Form 1059, Service School Academic Evaluation Report.
(2) The Commandant will provide the essay’s professional military subject there duning B100
Course Overview.
(3) Your essay will be formatted as shown below.
1. Introduction (1-2 paragraphs)
A. Opening statement
B. Background information
5
Purpose statement
Il. Body(2-4 paragraphs)
A: address, (Point supporting A) what What evidence. needs issues does within the the subject Army get and after your orwhy organization does this does issue this occur? subject Include
8 (Point B) Does the Army’s current approach to training improve (or not improve) ths
issue? (Could be tied to point A)
C. (Point C) Expand topic and provide evidence to support your thesis.
D. (Point D) What solutions regarding this issue can improve the Army and your
organization?
Il. Conclusion (1-2 paragraphs)
A. Summarize the main points
B. Make a strong, memorable final statement.
NOTES:
Essay must be 1-2 pages in length (title page does not count as a page)
Essay is an individual activity (although peer editing is allowed).
Essay must contain two references (ARs, personal interviews, per review artick
Essay is due on Day 5 of the course (provide students with exact date and time
Commandant (or designated representative) will choose the best essay.

Please conduct a leadership Case study on The Battle of Carentan, with specific

Please conduct a leadership Case study on The Battle of Carentan, with specific focus on United States Leadership dynamics which led to the successes / failures of that battle . Format is APA 7th. The first paragraph should include a lead-in, the intent of the battle, what actually happned, what went well, and how it could have been improved, and then a thesis. Following paragraphs should each focus on a separate Principle of Mission Command respectively as they pertain to the Battle. These principles are Competence, Mutual Trust, shared understanding, Commander’s Intent, Mission Orders, Disciplined Initiative, and Risk Acceptance. Paragraphs should include shared lessons learned from successes or failures.The final paragraph should be a conclusion Please include in-text citations in APA 7th Standard format and cited sources at the end. I will include a rubric following my order to ensure clarity of requirements.