Category: Medicine and Health

Injury Mitigation Project Content
Using all of the information gathered in your

Injury Mitigation Project Content
Using all of the information gathered in your Discussion paper, previous research, and information on corrective exercise in class/your book, you are going to create a team based injury mitigation program. Many times, athletes in a given sport/position have similar compensations and injury risk, so we are able to create a group injury mitigation plan to do what we can to lessen the chances of those injuries actually occurring.
So, what do we include in this injury mitigation plan? Think pre-warm up activities. Athletes need to focus on range of motion, strength, and endurance they tend to lack, as well as balance/proprioception. You can always include more than this, but this is a good base for most programs. Your program should attack the main issues that tend to cause the injury. Think: what strength or range of motion is typically lacking in someone who gets repetitive ankle sprains?
You are to create 20-30 minute program that can be done by an entire position group or team (meaning this plan should not have hands-on components like joint mobilizations, unless they are done by the patient themselves). In this plan, include:
Range of motion exercises
Strength/endurance exercises
Balance/proprioception exercises
Parameters for all exercises
Any equipment needed to complete the exercises
There is no requirement for the number of exercises, but it should attack the main compensations/issues associated with your chosen injury and sport. Be creative! You don’t need multiple “days”, just one solid plan they can use before they warm up for a practice or game.
Once you create your plan, discuss your rationale. There always needs to be a reason for your choice! This should include evidence, which may or may not be some you found in the initial portion of this assignment.
Lastly, put your discussion paper and this paper into one document. It should flow well, giving a background on your sport, the movement analysis and common injuries, and finishing with the plan you created and why you created it. It is expected that you have a solid draft of your final paper at this stage. You will be provided with feedback to implement into your final submission! A grading rubric can be found below.
​Grading Criteria
​0
​1
​Student included all requirements listed in the assignment description
​Missing 1 or more requirements
​All requirements present
​Injury mitigation program is applicable to the injury and sport, all requirements present
​Missing aspects of the program listed above, not applicable to the injury or sport
​Program is fully complete and applicable to the injury and sport
​Rationale is complete and uses appropriate evidence
​Rationale is incomplete or doesn’t use evidence (no citations may result in a zero on the assignment)
​Rationale is complete with evidence (AMA format)
​Paper is professional with a clear flow
​Paper is disorganized or does not use professional terminology
Paper is easy to follow and uses professional terminology​
​Student used proper grammar and mechanics
2-3 grammatical errors​
​0-1 grammatical errors
Sources are provided and its in AMA

The paper should double spaced in Times new roman font size 12. Including one pa

The paper should double spaced in Times new roman font size 12. Including one page for cover page and one page for reference.
Reference should be based on the american phycological association APA standards  

Review Chapter 12 in Community as Partner: Theory and Practice in Nursing. Begin

Review Chapter 12 in Community as Partner: Theory and Practice in Nursing. Begin the careful analysis of all community assessment data gathered to this point.
Review Nursing Process Applied to the Populations.ppt
Download the 5.2 Data Analysis Collection Tool to analyze your assessment findings and establish three priority community nursing diagnoses. All nursing diagnoses must address one weakness in the community that directly affects your at-risk population.
Utilize at least five current scholarly sources and a second Key Informant Interview. Add the information you also received from your at-risk population. Review Key Informant: The Three W’s.
Preview 5.2 Assignment: Data Analysis, where you will submit Part Three.
Review the rubric to ensure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Watch the optional video Unnatural Causes  #4: Bad Sugar as time allows. {https://www.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/566941/uiconf_id/25081401/entry_id/0_bvp9qyae}
Based on previous reading assignments, analyze the information you have collected in the past four weeks.
Document your assessment findings using the 5.2 Data Analysis Collection Tool file.
Write a synopsis of the statistics and your analysis, with support from the following:
a minimum of five current scholarly sources,
information communicated to you from your at-risk population.
Your completed data analysis should:
Include an analysis of the information gleaned from your at-risk population. This needs specific information regarding your community and at-risk population.
Consist of a description, in your own words with statistical validation, one strength and one weakness from the following subsystems comparing your findings to state and national statistics: Demographics, Physical Environment, Economics, Transportation and Safety, Health and Social Services, Education, Politics and Government, and Economics.
Not to exceed five data collection tool pages of content, double-spaced. This is not counting the reference page.
Include three nursing diagnoses that must be explicitly written for the at-risk population of choice and specific to three weaknesses in your analysis.
Include nursing diagnoses in the correct format and complete nursing diagnostic statements.
include an interview of “Migrant Refugees{homeless}”
see instructions for doing the at-risk population

I need to find the appropriate articles which meet my inclusion criteria ( witho

I need to find the appropriate articles which meet my inclusion criteria ( without writing any thing as a paper) .. a list of the articles ( or collect them in one file)
Title: Clinical and Preclinical Evidence for RAAS Modulation in the Management of Chronic Pain Syndromes: A Systematic Review
Inclusion Criteria
1. Study Type:
Clinical trials, observational studies, and preclinical studies (animal models) that investigate the role of RAAS modulation in the management of chronic pain syndromes.
2. Interventions:
Studies examining RAAS modulators, such as ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), direct renin inhibitors, and aldosterone antagonists.
3. Participants/Subjects:
– Clinical studies involving patients with chronic pain syndromes, such as fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, or other chronic pain conditions.
– Preclinical studies involving animal models induced with chronic pain conditions.
4. Outcomes:
– Primary outcomes: Measures of pain intensity, frequency, and duration (e.g., Visual Analog Scale, Numerical Rating Scale, behavioral pain assessments in animal models).
– Secondary outcomes: Quality of life, functional improvement, biochemical markers of pain, side effects, and adverse events.
6. Publication Date:
Studies published within the last 20 years to ensure relevance and up-to-date evidence.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Study Type:
Case reports, editorials, opinion pieces, reviews, and meta-analyses.
2. Interventions:
Studies not focusing on RAAS modulation or involving interventions unrelated to the RAAS (e.g., other pharmacological treatments not targeting the RAAS).
3. Participants/Subjects:
– Clinical studies not involving patients with chronic pain syndromes.
– Preclinical studies not involving animal models of chronic pain.
4. Outcomes:
Studies not reporting pain-related outcomes or where pain outcomes are secondary and not adequately reported.
6. Publication Date:
Studies published more than 20 years ago, unless they are seminal works providing foundational knowledge.
7. Quality:
Studies with poor methodological quality or lacking sufficient detail to assess the impact of RAAS modulation on chronic pain outcomes. 

1)3 to 5 references is needed (APA 7th)
2) What to include
-background/principle

1)3 to 5 references is needed (APA 7th)
2) What to include
-background/principles
-application in medicine
-limitations/future uses(innovations)
3) Times New Roman, size 12 , 1.5 spacing
4) Turnitin similarity index must be less than 20%

This paper
is needs to rewrite, remove plagiarism, Turnitin report lower than 18

This paper
is needs to rewrite, remove plagiarism, Turnitin report lower than 18%, needs
to have reference 6 academic research journal or article, and text citation.  APA7 style, send me Turnitin report.

Part I
For the first part, revise the essay you submitted for the second exam. R

Part I
For the first part, revise the essay you submitted for the second exam. Recall that this essay required you to apply Ackerman’s view from his article “Why Doctors Should Intervene” to the case of the physician, Dr. Emanuel, refusing medical screening and treatment for certain serious illnesses after turning seventy-five. Your revisions should address the comments received. (As a rough guide, the revised version should be around three pages, double-spaced.)
Part II
For the second part, I want you to expand on your revised essay from Part I. One of the issues discussed in the course is the challenge of allocating medical resources when there is scarcity. Suppose that a community adopted Dr. Emanuel’s position as a community-wide policy. That is, to address scarcity concerns regarding medical resources, persons over seventy-five in the community will not be screened or treated for certain medical conditions. Would such a policy be acceptable according to the guidelines adopted by White et al. in their article “Who Should Receive Life Support During a Public Health Emergency”?
In answering the above question, make sure to (a) explain the guidelines advocated by White et al. and (b) provide an argument for why you think this policy would or would not be acceptable according to these guidelines. Make sure to support your argument. (As a rough guide, your answer to this question should be between 2-3 pages, double-spaced. You do not need to re-explain Dr. Emanuel’s position, as this should already be included in your answer to Part I. You can jump right into assessing whether adopting Dr. Emanuel’s position (as a community-wide policy) would be acceptable according to the guidelines of White et al.)

This is a systematic review research paper. I chose the topic Gut Microbiota and

This is a systematic review research paper. I chose the topic Gut Microbiota and Nephrolithiasis. I am not sure exactly what to focus on in regards to this but mostly on how Gut microbiota can cause Nephrolithiasis. I am sure you can get more in debth in regards to this topic depending on what you read in the articles. This paper must include an abstract in the beginning which consists of Introduction, Hypothesis, Methods, Results and Conclusion. After that you start with the Introduction, Research Question, Hypothesis, Methods. In the methods section, There should be a title for Topic selection where I need to discuss what made me choose this topic, how did i generate my research question and hypothesis and to be quite honest, I really dont know. I figured it was very interesting since many people do get kidney stones and also not a lot of research has been done on it. In addition to this section, there should be a title for search strategies (what databases used, the keywords you used),  Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria (how did you select studies and why). Please note that methods are always in third person and in past tense. In the end of this section there must be a FLOW DIAGRAM. Overall there must be 15 articles, however 4 of those articles must be papers who are doing PRIMARY STUDIES (Direct research or meta analysis) on your subject!! These 4 articles are where you compare and contrast in the results section & also there must be a table description of these 4 articles in the end as well! The table should include Author, Study Type, Aim of the article and the results. Lastly is the DISCUSSION section where you only interpret the results of the studies you found (meaning those 4 main articles). In the end of this is the reference page. Please make sure anything you read in the articles must always be paraphrased and cited (literally everything). Those other articles you find will be put in those other categories in the paper (like in the introduction etc.,). The articles you find must ONLY BE FROM PUBMED!!! Please do not use CHAT GPT or AI because there is a system that will check if you used this. I will upload a document of exactly what is needed in this paper in detail. Please FOLLOW THIS DOCUMENT because it explains everything you need to know!! I will also upload other examples of research papers that students have done who recieved a 100% so you can make sure the paper is written exactly in that format. I wrote something before on this paper, you can take a look at it if you find it helpful and use those 5 articles otherwise you can ignore it but I will upload it for you as well.  

You
are required to investigate and evaluate TWO implemented innovations (Fused:

You
are required to investigate and evaluate TWO implemented innovations (Fused: REACH_Hopes_and_Dreams_Report_Full.pdf
TRP: The Resilience Project)
that
target the development of respectful relationships as a general resistance
resource in the post-schooling transition. You must select the most relevant
innovation for the Mackay State High School Year 12 cohort, and develop an
action strategy that strengthens diffusion and increases the likelihood of a
successful post-schooling transition for students. Your response will be
presented as an analytical exposition.

This paper
is needs to rewrite, remove plagiarism, Turnitin report lower than 18

This paper
is needs to rewrite, remove plagiarism, Turnitin report lower than 18%, needs
to have reference 3 academic research journal or article, and text citation.  APA7 style, send me Turnitin report.