Category: Media

Exemplification Essay about Social Media

Nothing has taken over so many people’s lives more than social media. The majority of people worldwide use social media on a daily basis. For adults, it is usually Facebook or Twitter while teens tend to use Snapchat, TikTok, and Instagram. This technology allows everyone to stay in touch whether the results are good or bad. When people really take a moment to think about how social media is affecting their lives, they may find that it actually has some negative consequences. Staying connected through social media can be harmful to users because of problems with addiction, increases in cyberbullying, and issues with mental health.

One harmful cause of social media is addiction in teenagers. Most teens can’t go without checking their social media feed several times a day. The popularity of these apps has caused more people to create their own accounts. According to the article, “The Rise of Social Media,” by Esteban Ortiz-Ospina, “Social media platforms are used by one-in-three people in the world, and more than two-thirds of all internet users’ (Ortiz-Ospina). Certain social media platforms are also more likely to be used by different age groups. This can help show what people of different ages find to be addicting. The article, “These are the Most Popular Social Networks in the US,” states, “Those ages 18 to 24 are substantially more likely than those ages 25 to 29 to say they use Snapchat (73% vs. 47%) and Instagram (75% vs. 57%)’ (Perrin). Younger people, who are more up-to-date with technology than older people, are more likely to use social media accounts on these apps. Since a large portion of teenagers have at least one social media account, it is easy for them to get wrapped up in other people’s lives. Teens more than anyone have become obsessed with their number of followers, and how many likes or comments they get on a post. A lot of people allow their social media networks to notify them when someone likes or comments on one of their posts. The ding can become addicting, and make checking social media a more frequent activity. Because teenagers are so absorbed with what other people think, they are constantly looking at it to see what their friends are doing and saying. Social media is like a drug; once you start using it, it is hard to get off of it.

Social media addiction also impacts how people interact with one another. Instead of getting together with friends in person, teens often connect virtually. Social media makes it really easy for people to contact others online. Ortiz-Ospina’s article says that ‘the rapid and vast adoption of these technologies is changing how we find partners, how we access information from the news, and how we organize to demand political change” (Ortiz Ospina). Communication in the world has taken a whole new approach since everything can be done through technology. Even when people do get together to hang out, they are mostly on their phones. Many teens will say that technology is what helps them connect with their friends. On the other hand, their parents may have a different opinion. In Kimberly Hornsby’s article, “Are Teens Really Addicted to Social Media? A Review of It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens,” she says that “adults, however, believe that teens are addicted to social media and that this addiction is stifling their ability to interact socially’ (Hornsby 56). Because teenagers are so used to talking to each other through texts or social media, there is a possibility that they may feel uncomfortable when they need to have a real conversation with someone in person. Teens use social media as an easy way to reach out to their friends, but too much time spent on it can make it harder for them to be comfortable socializing in person.

Even though social media makes it simple for teens to connect with others, it also takes them away from enjoying the people around them. Teens are constantly looking at their phones, so they are missing out on important life experiences that do not involve technology. For example, it is hard for teenagers to get through a school day without checking their phones. Hornsby’s article says that in order to keep learning environments separate from all distractions of phones, ‘Educators make rules for students in classrooms, schools, and districts regarding use of technology devices’ (Hornsby 56). The main reason teenagers sneak their phones into class with them is so that they can talk to their friends. Since this is the case, it would be better if they hung out in person more often outside of school. However, this idea does not stop teens from bringing their phones into class. Hornsby’s article explains that ‘to them, these media constitute a way to stay connected with friends in an increasingly busy world’ (Hornsby 56). It is true that it can be hard to coordinate getting together with everyone’s busy schedules, however, it is more valuable to spend time with friends in person as much as possible. Communicating with friends through social media apps, texting, or FaceTime isn’t a bad thing, but it shouldn’t be the primary way that people use to socialize with others. Since humans are social beings, social interactions with other people are necessary. It is most enjoyable when people socialize with their friends away from all distractions of phones and social media. According to the article, “What Happens When Teens Try to Disconnect From Tech For Three Days,” by Katrina Schwartz, “Several students noticed that when they didn’t have their phones or iPads, they were more ready to connect with friends and family, and more aware when those people were themselves wrapped up in devices” (Schwartz). When phones are set aside and social media is no longer an interruption, people can actually enjoy quality time together. Teenagers are so absorbed in the world of social media, so it is important for them to be able to step away from all of it and appreciate the world outside of their phones.

Because of social media, cyberbullying is becoming a bigger concern for adolescents. While bullying has always been an unfortunate reality, social media has allowed it to become out of control. Cyberbullying is more likely to happen when teenagers spend more time on social media. This is because it gives other users more opportunities to send hurtful comments. The article, “Associations Between Social Media and Cyberbullying: a Review of the Literature,” by Renee Garett et al. states that “this ability to share has given young people unprecedented access to private information and a readily available platform to leverage that information against others’ (Garett et al.). Teens that use social media sometimes have the ability to get onto information that most people wouldn’t want to be shared publicly. People can be cyberbullied in many different ways because it doesn’t always take the same form. According to the article, “Cyberbullying Experiences On-the-Go: When Social Media can Become Distressing,” by Anke Görzig and Lara A. Frumkin, “Cyberbullying can take various forms such as sending unwanted, derogatory, or threatening comments, spreading rumors, sending pictures or videos that are offensive or embarrassing by text, email, chat, or posting on websites including social networking sites (Görzig and Frumkin). This shows that cyberbullying is not just putting a mean comment on someone’s post. Bullies use many different methods of cyberbullying, and sometimes it is not as obvious to other people.

Teens, and even adults, tend to feel more comfortable saying hurtful things online rather than face-to-face. This is because they do not have to worry about what reaction they are going to get from their victim. Bullying is not as noticeable to other people when it is done through the internet. Social media makes it easy for bullies to send mean messages to other users. The article, “Automatic Detection of Cyberbullying in social media text” says that “social media [increases] the risk of children being confronted with threatening situations including grooming or sexually transgressive behavior, signals of depression and suicidal thoughts, and cyberbullying’ (Van Hee et al.). All social media users should know that there is a possibility of cyberbullying which can lead to dangerous or unhealthy outcomes for them. Garett’s article also says that “cyberbullying, a growing problem associated with social media use, has become a significant public health concern that can lead to mental and behavioral health issues and an increased risk of suicide’ (Garett et al.). Cyberbullying can be so hurtful on social media that it makes it more likely for teens to acquire health problems. Social media itself might not promote bullying, but it does provide easy access for cyberbullying to occur.

Some people say social media can be a good way for teens to encourage and build each other up, however, that is not always true. Yes, some teenagers may feel like social media gives them the encouragement they need to feel better about themselves. An article written by the Mayo Clinic Staff argues that “these networks can provide teens with valuable support, especially helping those who experience exclusion or have disabilities or chronic illnesses’ (“Teens and social media use: What’s the impact?”). This may be the scenario for some teenagers, but it is not the case for everyone. This is important to remember because there will always be people in the world who try to tear others down. Social media is a place where they are able to do that. According to Görzig and Frumkin’s article, ‘Our findings indicate that cyberbullying on-the-go causes more distress than cyberbullying does already’ (Görzig and Frumkin). People should not assume that all users on social media have pure motivations to uplift everyone else. No matter what people do, there will always be bullies on social media who ridicule other users for their looks, opinions, or anything else. No one is going to be liked by everyone, and there are some people who simply want to make the lives of others miserable. While it is true that there are plenty of social media users who are supportive of other people, it is inevitable that there will always be bullies in the world.

Many of the mental health issues that adolescents experience come from the use of social media. Some teens may feel left out which can lead to mental problems like sadness and depression. According to the Mayo Clinic Staff, “A 2019 study of more than 6,500 12- to 15-year-olds in the U.S. found that those who spent more than three hours a day using social media might be at heightened risk for mental health problems’ (“Teens and Social Media Use: What’s the Impact?”). Parents need to pay attention to the amount of time their teens spend on social media because too much usage can be unsafe. If teens are on social media too much, there is a possibility, and even a likelihood, that they could start to feel depressed or worthless. The cyberbullying issue on social media can also cause teenagers to become depressed and insecure about themselves. When teens are sad, they will sometimes isolate themselves in their rooms with their phones. This can be dangerous because it can lead them to inappropriate sites. An editorial by The Lancet states that ‘whatever the context, and whoever should take responsibility, social media platforms have been providing a route through which young people can find explicit images of self-harm’ (“Social Media, Screen Time, and Young People’s Mental Health” 611). Teens who get into these bad images are at risk of either developing a mental illness or even committing suicide. Social media usage should be monitored in order to prevent adolescents from being at risk of harmful effects.

Social media can cause anxiety in teenagers by pressuring them into feeling like they have to look, act, or think a certain way. There are a lot of expectations put out on social media, and teens feel the need to live up to them. Teenagers do whatever it takes to make themselves look good, even if it means that they have to hide who they really are. According to the article, “How Using Social Media Affects Teenagers,” by Rachel Ehmke, ‘The more identities you have, and the more time you spend pretending to be someone you aren’t, the harder it’s going to be to feel good about yourself’ (Ehmke). Teens are more focused on who society wants them to be than on who they want themselves to be. Social media can cause teens to become self-conscious about their appearance, beliefs, lifestyle, and more. In fact, a lot of teenage girls especially are at risk of developing eating disorders because of anxiety that comes from social media. There are a ton of images on the internet of what the perfect body should look like, and teenage girls do whatever they can to make themselves look like models. Ellen Feldman’s article, “Social Media Use and Disordered Eating in Young Adolescents,” says that “social media use and DE [Disordered Eating] behaviors and cognition are common in young adolescents’ (Feldman). This shows that eating disorders are becoming more and more common because of social media. Anxiety is a bigger problem for teenagers today because social media pressures them with certain expectations.

Although staying in touch with friends through social media can be good, it can negatively affect mental health. Many teenagers struggle with mental health issues, and a lot of those cases are acquired through social media usage. The Mayo Clinic Staff argues that ‘social media that are humorous or distracting or provides a meaningful connection to peers and a wide social network might even help teens avoid depression’ (“Teens and Social Media Use: What’s the Impact?”). Even though social media might help some teens avoid problems like depression, either being ignored or receiving insensitive comments can be so hurtful. Ehmke’s article explains that through social media, ‘Kids now know with depressing certainty when they’re being ignored’ (Ehmke). Teenagers need to limit their time on social media because it can be unhealthy for their mental well-being. The article, “Problematic Online Behaviors among Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Associations between Cyberbullying Perpetration, Problematic Social Media Use, and Psychosocial Factors,” explains that ‘it was found that the teenagers emotionally invested too much in social media during night and day, had low sleep quality, low self-esteem, high anxiety, and high depression levels’ (Kırcaburun et al. 894). This is proof that the more time teens spend on social media, the more likely it is for mental health issues to evolve.

Addiction problems, cyberbullying escalations, and mental health issues are all examples of unhealthy effects that are caused by social media. Since many people are under the spell of social media, they do not know what to do without it. Perhaps some people don’t even realize they have an addiction problem. Teenagers in particular cannot imagine what their lives would be like if they did not have social media. All social platforms keep our world interconnected. Even though the beneficial intent is to give people the ability to stay in contact from anywhere around the world, it comes with downsides. While it is unlikely that anyone is going to stop using social media, everyone can still be more cautious when they do use it. Social media alone is not the problem. The problem is how people choose to use it.

Evaluation Essay on Soundcloud

SoundCloud is an audio distribution site, where users can record, upload, and promote their soundtracks. SoundCloud enables you to tune in the same number of tracks you need yet just permits you to download tracks whose downloading is allowed by the track owner. Downloading playlist songs is much the same as the single-track download. Simply discover the playlist URL and open the SingleMango site. The URL can be inserted in any of the textboxes which have the option to download either the single track or numerous tracks. A few playlists have as numerous as 450+ songs. If you utilize other driving downloaders, then it’s going to require some investment for you to download the playlist. Even, stacking the download joins for the playlists going to be a period-taking thing. The claim to fame of the SingleMango is that everything necessary to download a whole playlist is just 3 seconds, while others take 78 seconds to download the same.

Social media has helped numerous individuals to get celebrated the world over. Huge numbers of us accept that just Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter can put somebody on the map around the world. In any case, generally speaking, individuals don’t have the foggiest idea about that for musicians SoundCloud is a perfect platform for glorification.

SoundCloud is loaded with individuals who love music just as support it. This is a superb platform for both the individuals who need to pull in the attention of individuals and to positively shape the music industry. It is difficult to stand out enough to be noticed. It takes a ton of hard work and motivation. But, one more thing you have to take a shot at – is promoting you among others. Individuals for the most part avoid this significant step.

It will assist you with getting more followers, likes, comments, reposts, and downloads. It seems like an easy breezy, yet as a general rule, it isn’t.

The smart move is to enlist some service provider who can promote your work, while you are taking a shot at creating new content. SocialBoss is the best service provider around the web. We offer you the best quality arrangements, and they will most likely fulfill you.

There is constantly an inquiry that emerges for some, – for what reason do individuals download SoundCloud tracks? It is notable that people buy what they need or like. Similarly, people or users download just the music they love, or they need to hear over and over. Having more downloads shows that individuals adored the work you made for them. They need to hear it persistently.

SoundCloud download tracks likewise have benefits, including:

• Great support

Having your own fan club is a major thing. This does not just imply that you have become a renowned individual. In any case, it additionally implies that you currently have individuals who bolster your work. If individuals on SoundCloud don’t see you, don’t settle down for it. You can get incredible help If you utilize our services to download your content. If you have a lot of downloads on your profile, it implies that individuals bolster what you make for them, and they need to hear more from you. It makes you a well-known and widely listened to musician.

• Massive Audience

SoundCloud is fundamentally a platform for individuals who make music, however, we don’t understand this is additionally a spot for music pundits and lovers. If you have a lot of downloads on your music, then there is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that you will have the option to pull in the attention of these pundits and lovers. It can also put you on the map among the people who pursue these pundits. Utilizing our services, you can get many downloads for your content and for yourself.

• Wide Exposure

We can give you the number of downloads on your SoundCloud account you have to get to have extensive exposure. You simply need to reveal to us the number of downloads you need. You choose, make a request, pass payment, and look out for your service.

• Get Contracted

A few people who chip away at music are dreaming of going into an agreement with a monster label. But, it is difficult. There are various artists, who need to make the most of this opportunity, the question is, – by what method will they do it? With getting increasingly more downloads on your SoundCloud track you have more opportunities to stand apart among the others. Some record companies can notice you and sign up for collaboration, or even a contract! However, with a recognizable number of downloads, you have a greater opportunity to be marked to something big.

Television Has Had a Positive Impact on Presidential Elections: Synthesis Essay

Since the beginning of television in the 1940s, it has played a major role in marketing, commercials, and most intensively—most controversially— in presidential elections. Since 1960, presidents discussing their political ideology is not a guarantee for presidential victory, rather it is character, demeanor, presentability, and more than determining the verdict. This is all facilitated by media outlets. However, as the media has played a critical role in providing information and exposing corruption, the magnitude of manipulating information, introducing beauty standards, and weak unification has had a negative influence on presidential elections.

It is well known that just like people manipulate numbers to prove a point, that media coverage manipulates presidential video clips, and cut-out tweets to prevail a message—their own message. In Source F, the news program “Nightline” is known to take boring segments of a political debate and twist them into a short, concise video alternating what expressions, voice range, and political viewpoints they want to showcase on their network. Most people justify this by mentioning that it is to express political viewpoints in a short amount of time or make it more appealing. However, all the “Nighttime” programs and many other networks are doing is cutting out what they want to show, eliminating what they do and don’t want viewers to know which can be harmful and cause inaccurate images of presidential opponents.

In the first-ever presidential televised campaign in the Kennedy-Nixon presidential debates, it would seem most logical that with greater access to opponents’ viewpoints, more people would be inclined to listen. But the exact opposite has occurred. It appears that the televised campaigns favored Kennedy because of his younger, handsome appearance as opposed to Nixon’s bland and boring face. This is shown in Source C as “looks triumph content” and looks are what determines a president, not presidential readiness. It goes even further to remark that as people liked Kennedy more on television, the exact opposite was for radio. Showing that beauty, once again, triumphs presidentially.

Source A claims that television in the presidential election has unified us, that the “people” have become a “nation” again increasing “public communication”. However, is this really the case? Many claim the Kennedy-Nixon elections unified the nation in a time during the Cold War, but as mentioned before is selecting a prettier president over an uglier one showcasing unity? Back then it would seem that the nation was unified in watching the first-ever televised campaign, but that was only due to the fact that it was something new not that it actually had an impact. Nowadays it is almost impossible to unify a nation. With party lines forming rigid entry lines, the general public is forced into a polarized system of pick-an-choose. Not very unifying.

With increasing polarization, it is easy to miss the negative aspects of the media in presidential elections. But as we analyze deeper into the matter, the hidden codes of manipulation of video clips, viewership perspective on beauty, and false hopes of any sort of unification create a larger divide that would otherwise have been smaller.

Essay on Media and Teenage Pregnancy

Adolescents in the United States have an unlimited amount of access to a multitude of different types of mass media, including television, music, movies, and the Internet practically social media sites. The majority of these adolescents tend to utilize their time focusing on the media rather than the education they receive in school or their parents. The majority of this content idealizes being sexually active, including different types of sex messages with dialogue and content. Few of these diverse messages and content in the media include any type of information about being safe by using contraceptives and being mindful of sexual health. These articles review discuss the effects of sex education and the media on teen pregnancy and adolescents being sexually active (Manduley, A., Mertens). It also discusses different ways that being sexually active is taught in the education system and how the different types of media play an effect and influence adolescents in their day-to-day lives.

The media may glamorize and portray teenage pregnancy but it plays a significant role in sex education because television shows are giving young women fame for being teenage mothers and they are being paid to be a part of this. Negative sexual health messages are shown because the girls on these shows are asked if they were trying to be safe by using contraceptives and they explain that they were not doing anything to engage in protected sex (Manduley, A., Mertens). Teenage pregnancy may be correlated with the nature of sex education and the media. This is a significant issue because adolescent women do not comprehend the cost of hospital bills, clothes, food, diapers, and doctor appointments. More than half of all teenagers who have a baby will not graduate high school.

There is not a federal mandate to teach sex education in public schools and less than half of all public schools in this country offer information on how to obtain birth control. Part of it may also be that society has not come to the reality that adolescents are sexually active. This type of attitude may endanger many young teens who could possibly become pregnant, and be at risk for STDs, HIV, or AIDS.

Former President George W. Bush spent $135 million to encourage adolescents to “abstain from sex as their only form of birth control”. These types of programs often restrict students’ access to information on sexuality and contraception. These types of programs also often exclude a lot of basic information like puberty and sexual reproduction and also contain little to no information about pregnancy and disease prevention other than abstinence (Chris Trenholm).

The American Economic Association is, “the study of labor, land, and investments, of money, income, and production, and of taxes and government expenditures” (aeaweb.org). Economics is a relevant discipline it is a significant part of how much money sexual education is allotted for public schools, but also how funds are used to determine what kind of education children will receive. This also raises the question, of who provides the funding and who decides what information to teach or omit. The article reviewed, “Impacts of Abstinence Education on Teen Sexual Activity, Risk of Pregnancy, and Risk of Sexually Transmitted Diseases” by Dr. Christopher Trenholm. Dr. Trenholm has a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and Government from the College of William and Mary and a PhD in Economics from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Currently, Dr. Trenholm works as a senior economist and associate director for health research at Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. (NASHP.ORG).

The article begins with facts and figures of how much federal funding is used towards sexual education. Trenholm states that abstinence-only programs have grown rapidly over the last few years, gaining financial support and being forcefully matched by states at seventy-five percent. States receiving funds upwards of fifty million dollars will then be combined with state-matched funding resulting in eighty-seven and a half million dollars to teach abstinence-only to prevent unwanted teen pregnancy and unwanted STD transmission (Trenholm et al. 255). The article compares and contrasts 4 different sexual education programs with an emphasis on abstinence. This is just a sampling of different federally and state-funded programs that are being offered in public schools around the nation to children of different races, ages, and financial backgrounds (Trenholm et al. 255-277).

Economics is specifically relevant to teen sexuality and sexual education in schools because it is the basis of how we develop within society and how we behave as a part of it. The internet and social media platforms have negative health consequences due to a false belief in privacy leading to more provocative behavior and discussion around drinking, sex, and violence. Social media may also provide increased access to partners who are more experienced, leading to increased communication about sex because of the perceived privacy of social media. Those who are more active on social media could partake in more risky behaviors because of a larger peer network influencing their attitudes and social norms. Although these findings indicate a decrease in high-frequency SMS and Facebook use between baseline and follow-up, this does not necessarily imply a reduction in overall use.

Humans spend an excessive deal of their evolving life inside social institutions learning how to build and nurture relationships with little knowledge of how healthy relationships are formed or maintain a significant counterpart to that law has been an increase in private sector teen pregnancy prevention work, led by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. The National Campaign has spearheaded a trend of utilizing new media technologies, such as social networking websites, mobile and smartphone capabilities, and online gaming in teen pregnancy prevention. This article examines the social-media-based work of the National Campaign, showing the heavily disciplinary and moralizing functions of these strategies and their role within a new construction of social welfare. It argues that these tactics form a redefined notion of the social safety net based on a vision of citizens distributing vital, attractively packaged information among themselves via a privatized cybernetwork in order to maintain social well-being through the cultivation of proper sexual and reproductive behavior. Within this framework, teen sexuality emerges as the most urgent target for discipline and management. Viewed as impulsive, naive, media savvy, and trend-obsessed, teenagers appear to require provocative market-based interventions in their most intimate moments. Grounded in the neoliberal discourses of multiculturalism, market rationality, and intimate citizenship, this teen pregnancy prevention work ultimately serves to obscure and undergird the punitive work of welfare reform and its deepening of inequalities based on race, class, gender, and sexuality ed.

“Effective approaches to reducing adolescent unprotected sex, pregnancy, and childbearing” by Dr. Douglas Kirby. “Dr. Kirby received his PhD in Sociology from UCLA in 1975. For the past 25 years he served as Senior Research Scientist at ETR Associates in California, USA”. He has written numerous articles on the sexual and reproductive health of young people. Dr. Kirby, “is widely recognized as the leading world expert on sex, relationships and HIV education curriculum standards” (UNESCO.org). Dr. Kirby’s article focuses on comprehensive sexual education programs that meet a specific criterion. The programs must include,

(a) the study was published in 1980 or later, (b) the study was conducted in the United States or Canada, (c) the program targeted adolescents of middle school or high school age (roughly 12 to 18), (d) the study used an appropriate experimental or quasi-experimental design, (e) the sample size was at least 100 in the combined treatment and control group, and (f) the study measured impact on sexual or contraceptive behavior or pregnancy or childbearing (Kirby 51).

Of the many studies conducted and researched by Dr. Kirby, he found that comprehensive programs that covered both abstinence and contraceptive use/ STD awareness did not show an increase in teen sexuality. The onset of sexual exploration was also not found to begin at an earlier age when introduced to a comprehensive sexual education program (Kirby 51-52). Comprehensive programs were found to decrease the number of sexual partners, lengthen the time teens waited until they had sex, and increase contraceptive use (Kirby 52-55). Dr. Kirby found programs that also included community volunteer work and involvement along with clinical visits to learn about how to identify STDs were among the most effective (Kirby 54-55). Implementing comprehensive programs also showed significant financial impacts. “That study found that for every dollar invested in the Safer Choices program, $2.65 in total medical and social costs were saved. The savings were produced by preventing pregnancy and STDs, including HIV (Kirby 53). The research conducted in Dr. Kirby’s article showed that educating teens leads to better decision-making and more knowledgeable teens when they do decide to become sexually active.

It is important to the awareness of young adolescents who are sexually active and do not know or understand the precautions that need to be taken if they choose to do so. Many of the research articles showed that the educational system is not doing justice to its students because for the majority the only sexual education the adolescents receive are abstinent-based approaches. Many young adolescents are receiving their information from different forms of mass media like television, movies, magazines, video games, and the Internet (Harris, A. L). A lot of the popular media tends to glorify being sexually active and does not look at how to be safe like using contraceptives and the different types that can be used. This is imperative because numerous adolescents are being influenced by the media.  

Essay on Sociological Imagination and Media

Mass media has changed the social landscape since its origins; with growing technological advancements and the digital revolution, the way in which we communicate as well as interact with society as individuals has been largely shaped by the media we consume. As globalization has interconnected our society economically, culturally, and socially; the media has also been shaped by the processes of globalization. With the advancement of technology came the accessibility of such media through the globalization process, which in turn has brought about great change and influence on society. As of now, with the emergence of digital convergence, it is easier than ever to access news, social platforms, online banking, and more which would not have been possible before the digital revolution and processes of globalization. The essay will structure itself thematically. There will be a consideration and analysis of whether we are living in a ‘global village’ that shares global culture and issues, how social movements have been amplified by the new media, and how this has changed our understanding of the global media and its relations to the ‘sociological imagination’.

Firstly, to measure how the global media has contributed to the ‘sociological imagination’ and globalization, it is important to understand and reach a definition of those concepts. Developments in technology have led to a digital convergence whereby on one device many types of content can be reached such as audio-visual and a higher amount of interactionally can be seen on all platforms including the news and social media platforms. Before the digital revolution and the ability of media that travel across transnational borders almost instantly, media outlets had a one-way system of communication. What is meant by this is that media co-operations were largely centralized, regulated, and mostly nationalized. They provided the duty of communication by speaking to the world rather than having the interactionally that we can now as a result of these technological advancements. The global media is in simple terms, mass communication on a global scale that allows people from across the globe to gain access to the same information. As (Flew, 2008) finds ‘In the twenty-first century, we find that social media, carried through digital networks and the global Internet are enabling a highly diverse array of individual, groups, organizations and movements to produce and globally distribute media content. This presents new challenges to show how we understand the media.’ To elaborate, the global media has allowed individuals from all over the globe regardless of characteristics such as social class, race, sexuality, and so on to become media distributors and producers and this presents new challenges in how we define the new media as well as measure the effect of the global media on social issues.

The Sociological imagination is a term coined by sociologist C. Wright Mills, the author describes the sociological imagination as enabling ‘us to grasp history and biography and the relations between the two within society.’ (C Wright Mills, 1959). The sociological imagination allows the individual to be aware of the concept that many of the problems faced within society have social roots. It enables the individual to connect and understand that concept in the context to wider society. Exploring the definitions of the two concepts of global media and the ‘sociological imagination demonstrates that social issues can now be seen as a result of the global media and globalization through a global lens. An example of this would be how the global media has changed social protest in the twenty-first century.

Social protest has been present in history for centuries even without modern-day technology, however, with technological advancements and the revolution of analog forms of media to digitalized forms of media – concepts of social issues are accelerated and discussed on a global level beyond their transnational borders. Philosopher Marshall McLuhan developed the concept of a ‘global village’ to explore the idea that as a result of advancements in technology, the world would become connected and share a ‘global village’ that allows individuals to share a global culture. Therefore, the argument stands that we can now share social issues as a global force. McLuhan describes that ‘As we begin to react in depth to the social life and problems of our global village, we become reactionaries’ (McLuhan, 1964). Evidence suggests that as a result of the new media and processes of globalization, societies from across the world can share social issues. An example to draw upon is the increase in discussion for the Black Lives Matter Movement. Protests broke out after a video of George Floyd, an African American man, was killed by police brutality. The video was recorded and posted on social media by an onlooker, and it spread globally as the discussion of the social issue of police brutality towards African Americans. This is a direct link to how as a result of the global media, more specifically social media, social protest from all around the globe was formed. In fact, research showed that social media had a huge role in sparking the discussions of social media and changing their opinions on certain social problems – ‘Roughly a quarter (23%) of adult social media users in the United States – and 17% of adults overall – say they have changed their views about a political or social issue because of something they saw on social media in the past year.’ (Perrin, 2020). Overall, it is clear to see that the global media in some senses has led to the transparency of societal issues, it has arguably given individuals the freedom as their own media distributors and creators to shed light on issues that may be avoided by more centralised and controlled media platforms.

However, some argue that we do not live in a ‘global village’ as McLuhan suggested, especially not with one shared culture. Smith (1991 as quoted in Flew, 2018) argues that ‘If by ‘culture’ is meant a collective mode of life, or a repertoire of beliefs, styles, values, and symbols then we can only speak of cultures, never just culture. the idea of a ‘global culture’ is a practical impossibility.’ Whilst the idea of a ‘global village’ can be seen, on the basis that as a result of technological advancements and the interconnectedness of the world through the processes of globalization, there has been an increase of culture being shared through the global media. It can also be argued that there is not just one shared culture, but many cultures are shared as ‘villages’ rather than a ‘single village’.

Additionally, some have concerns over the effects of cultural globalization on societies as a result of growing global media. There is a relationship between co-operations and the global media; one in which means there is a higher concentration of conglomerates dominating the mass media. Large competitive conglomerates such as Walt Disney, News Corp, Sony, and more are among those who dominate the industry.

As the process of globalization of the media is connected to global corporate expansion, cooperation can grow in influence in a global media market. Only a handful of corporations produce the majority of the mass media. Technology has been accelerating globalization and globalized media as it allows fast communication and enables a wider reach into mass markets. Multi-national media companies use vertical integration and the benefits of globalization to capitalize on a global marketplace rather than a local marketplace for their media products. This supports the work of (McChesney, 2001) who stated ‘economic and cultural globalization arguably would be impossible without a global commercial media system to promote global markets and to encourage consumer values.’ The argument therefore stands that, being as many of these co-operations have their roots in the West and more specifically America, a process of dominant American ‘ideologies’ or ‘culture’ such as the value of consumerism is being inflicted onto developing countries. Cultural customs from around the globe such as food, music, dance, and more are being shared via new media, however, there are still American customs such as fast-food chains like McDonald’s that can be seen all around the globe. It is then questionable that to some extent globalization has in some ways created a ‘global culture’. There are fears that this will lead to the fragmentation of traditional cultures.

In conclusion, the process in which globalization has transformed the global media as well as how the global media has helped accentuate the process of globalization have changed the way in which we communicate and use our ‘sociological imagination. The forms of global media such as social media platforms have helped to give voices to all socio-groups within our societies across the globe- accelerating and discussing on a global scale societal issues and fighting against injustices such as the use of social media in the BLM movement. Some are skeptical of the effects of the globalized media arguing that it has fragmented local cultures through the domination of Western media outlets that control much of the global media. Overall, the conclusion can be made that the global media can contribute to society for some in an effective and helpful way, whereas in others, it can cause corruption and fragmentation.

Media Influence on Teenage Pregnancy Essay

Parenting can be challenging, especially for younger parents. Teen pregnancy is not a new issue, In were close to 200,000 babies born to those between the ages of 15 and 19. The issue of teen pregnancy seems to be glamorized more and more every day on TV shows such as ‘Teen Mum’, ‘And Sixteen and Pregnant’, and also by young celebrities on social media such as Jamie Lynn Spears. When it comes to the serious issue of teen pregnancy being portrayed in such a fantasized way, where do we draw the line? There are many causes of teen pregnancy, such as peer pressure; however, many teen pregnancies can be influenced by television shows and celebrities on social media. This is because they make the issue of parenting at such a young age seem simple by dismissing many of the challenges that come with it and replacing them with the idea of being able to make money from young pregnancy or even being able to be like your favorite celebrities. How absurd is that!?

It could be argued that TV shows discourage teen pregnancy, as they show many of the disadvantages and challenges of having children at such a young age, such as financial issues. Around the time that ’16 and Pregnant’ was first shown on screens, there was a sharp decline in teen birth rates which suggests that these shows did do their job. However, sometimes it’s hard to believe that TV shows such as ‘Sixteen and Pregnant’ and ‘Teen Mum’ are made to discourage teen pregnancy as many critics of such shows have stated that, ‘Even though many challenges of being a parent at a young age are shown, there are also some cases in which it is suggested throughout the show that getting pregnant was for the best.’ After these types of shows became a hit, parents and educators became increasingly worried that they were beginning to show the teen mum’s life as ‘cool’ instead of showing the challenging side. Studies show that more than 50% of teen mums never finish school. Another study reported that teen mothers face significant levels of stress that can then lead to increased mental health concerns. In addition to higher rates of postpartum depression, teenage mothers have higher rates of depression and these health issues can have a significant impact on those around us such as family members, friends, and educators. Personally, I believe that these shows don’t cover these issues as much as they should; these issues are mostly brushed under the carpet during these shows which is not good enough!

Most reality television shows and movies give an illusion to young, expecting mothers that they are ready to be responsible parents when really they are far from it. Getting pregnant young prevents you from experiencing many great things that you just can’t do with a baby. I mean, would you really want to throw your life away and stop yourself from having fun in your teen years, just to sit at home and look after a baby? I know I definitely wouldn’t! Teens should be running around and having fun, doing crazy things like a pack of wild animals. These shows ultimately create a false fantasy about teen pregnancy which takes away from the concepts of ‘planned parenthood’. Popular movies about pregnancy such as ‘Knocked Up’, paint a picture that teen pregnancy will be fun and will end happily with a good support system from family and friends. However, there is much more to it in the real world: overwhelming responsibilities, stress, anxiety, and much more. These shows do attempt to educate teens on the struggles that come with parenting, however, fail to do so as they glamorize it and do not show the real responsibilities of being a teen parent. Due to the media giving teens the silly illusion that they are actually mature enough to become a parent, if they do decide to have a child, there are many long-term consequences that can effect the child; The child may become a young parent themselves; they could go into foster care and they may even get involved in crimes or drug use due to being neglected by their unfit mother. For example, studies have shown that children of teen mothers are 50% more likely to repeat a grade due to lower performance on standardized tests and that sons of teen mothers are 13% more likely to end up in prison.

MTV’s teen pregnancy shows spread the message that you can make money from having a baby, and because of this many teens have actually tried it. Such as Farah Abhrams, who stars In ‘Teen mom’ and ‘Sixteen and Pregnant’ who is now always on the cover of tabloids for her shocking plastic surgeries and has a net worth of £1 million! This can result in teen girls thinking that getting pregnant will magically be broadcast on TV and they will become a famous celebrity swimming in money. It’s absolutely ridiculous how such a serious topic is being made a joke out of thanks to these types of movies and TV shows.

Sure, It’s great that MTV wanted to spread awareness of teen pregnancy; however, the way they are going about it isn’t helping in the slightest. Some of the young watchers of these shows end up having the mindset of ‘she may have a child but she has a family to help, she still goes out with her friends and has fun’, and that mindset leads to carelessness when it comes to sexual intercourse and many other responsibilities. Even if MTV does show some of the struggles of teen parenting, teens are getting the wrong message and it is so unbelievably unfair to make them believe these things when in reality the situation is so much different. Teens are given the message that they can earn money and become a star for getting pregnant at such a young age. For example, one of the cast members Janelle Evans from ‘Teen Mom 2′ and ’16 and Pregnant’, her friends got pregnant shortly after her as they saw the fame she gained from it and wanted to be just like her. Because of this, they were labeled ‘copycat moms’. This kind of message encourages teens to get pregnant for fame when really most teen mums can hardly work enough to earn the money to take care of their baby properly. For example, The U.S. Department of Agriculture has estimated that single parents living on low income need close to $10,000 just to take care of the baby in the first year. Working enough to earn this amount of money is tricky as many teen mums have to balance school, work, and looking after their child.

Jamie Lynn Spears was a Nickelodeon star and many teens will view the shows that she stars in, because of this you may think that she would be a good role model. Not so. You thought wrong. Spears became pregnant at 16 and took to social media stating ‘Amazing; being a mom is the best feeling in the world’, now, this may be true for the people who are ready to be a mother and also may be true for young celebrities who have the money to support themselves, however, this is hardly the case for other teen mothers. The image that celebrities spread is influencing young girls to make the wrong choices as they believe that their experience will be the same as people such as Jamie Lynn Spears, it’s crazy if you ask me.

Overall, it has been shown that MTV did start with good intentions when first releasing these shows but, unfortunately, the message they have tried to spread has been taken over and watered down completely. The same goes for the young teen mum celebrities. Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s great that they are enjoying their lives with their children, however, the way they show their lives on social media as simple with kids instead of showing the challenges they face can make young girls think that their experience would be the same. It has been proven that once again the glamour and unrealistic fantasies of social media and TV have won over many young girls’ hearts and shoved the true and hard reality of the topic to the side!

Media and the Vietnam War Essay

This investigation will evaluate the question: To what extent did media coverage affect American public opinion of the Vietnam War? This exploration will focus on media reports during the Vietnam War and analyze the implications that news coverage had on public support for the war in the United States.

The first source that will be evaluated is Walter Cronkite’s editorial “We Are Mired in Stalemate” from his CBS Evening News report on February 27, 1968. The origin of this source is a summarizing report by Walter Cronkite, an American journalist and news anchor during the Vietnam War, of his findings in Vietnam after the Tet Offensive. The origin is valuable because Cronkite was very popular and was dubbed “the most trusted man in America” because he had built a reputation of objectivity as a news reporter. Consequently, when he shared his personal opinion on the Vietnam War, the American public was deeply impacted and grew doubtful of the reality of the war. The origin is also valuable because Cronkite had personal experience of what the war was truly like because he traveled to Vietnam to personally cover the Tet Offensive. His firsthand experience legitimized his opinion of the likely outcome of the war because he had accurate information to base his perspective on. However, the origin is limited by the fact that Cronkite was not a war strategy expert, so he may have misinterpreted the situation. The content of the source includes Cronkite giving a special report during the CBS Evening News called Report from Vietnam: Who, What, When, Where, Why? summarizing his visit to Vietnam. He ended his report with an editorial now known as “We Are Mired in Stalemate” where he explained that he believed the war was unwinnable. While Cronkite was in Vietnam, he was perturbed by what he was seeing in Vietnam conflicting with what President Johnson was reporting back home. The source’s purpose was to convince the American public that the Vietnam War was unwinnable and to persuade the United States government to instead look to negotiate an end to the war. This is valuable because it illustrates how the media portrayed the war, which influenced public perception of the war. However, it is limited in value because it only portrays what one media outlet was reporting during the war and it does not address any successes of the war. It is also limited in value because it does not portray media coverage before the Tet Offensive which limits the range of opinion to the second half of the war.

The second source that will be evaluated is George Moss’s 1990 book Vietnam: An American Ordeal. The origin of this source is valuable because Moss is a history professor at City College in San Francisco, specializing in United States History, and has written numerous books about America during the twentieth century which shows that Moss is well educated on the Vietnam War. Additionally, the book was published in 1990 which makes it valuable because Moss had access to an extensive range of sources, such as public polls, military stories, and actual media from the war, so he could generate a comprehensive analysis of the effect of the media during the Vietnam War. The origin is strengthened in its value by Moss being alive during the Vietnam War. He experienced media coverage of the war as an American citizen, which indicates he knows how the American people were affected by the press. However, Moss experiencing media coverage during Vietnam is also a limitation because he would have formed an opinion back then which suggests that his analysis of the media may be subjective. The content of this source includes Moss arguing against theorists who believe that media coverage caused the U.S. to lose the war in Vietnam. Moss asserts that public opinion was negative towards the war before news coverage became critical after the Tet Offensive. He states that the media changed its perception of the war to match public opinion rather than try to shape it. The purpose of Moss’s book is to provide a comprehensive record of the Vietnam War, which entails an examination of media coverage during the war where he argues that media coverage during the war did not significantly affect American public opinion. The purpose is valuable because it covers the entirety of the Vietnam War so Moss could make connections on the trends of American public opinion throughout the war. But the purpose is limited by the fact that Moss was writing a narrative of the Vietnam War and not specifically media coverage so he did not examine the media as extensively as he could have.

Vietnam War and the Media: Narrative Essay

Some historians argue that the broadcasting of the Vietnam War and the effect that that had on the American people was the reason for the Americans losing the war. Daniel Hallin, Professor of Communications asserts, ‘What was the effect of television on the development and outcome of the war? The conventional wisdom has generally been that for better or worse it was an anti-war influence: The argument has often been made that any war reported in an unrestricted way by television would eventually lose public support.’ Hallin correctly identifies that the role of the media was the reason for American failure.

Attached is a picture that was taken at My Lai on 16 March 1968. The picture depicts the bodies of those killed in My Lai. My Lai was an American-led search and destroy mission in the Quang Ngai region of southern Vietnam. Charlie Company in the early hours of the morning entered My Lai and in the following hours somewhere between 300 and 400 civilians (mainly women and children) were killed. The search and destroy mission had been to uncover Viet Cong soldiers however, no Viet Cong was found not only that but only three weapons were recovered meaning that the Vietnamese did not fight back. The My Lai massacre as it became known shocked the American people as it gave them an insight into what was going on in Vietnam. The My Lai massacre broadcasting supports Hallin, this is because when the American people saw the images from My Lai, they were shocked and disgusted. ‘The horrors of war entered the living rooms of the Americans’ this extract from a blog called The Warbird’s forum describes how the American people also felt it illudes to how the Vietnam War also became known as the war fought from the living room.

In conclusion, Hallin is correct when he says that television would eventually lose public support. If the American people had not been able to see what was happening in Vietnam, then they would not have protested. The anger the American people felt began to spill from the living rooms to the streets this is where America lost the battle. The police and army were needed to break up riots and fights. This in turn meant that forces were needed at home as well as in Vietnam. The fights and protests spread American resources to much meaning to stop all the American people from rebelling against the government America had to pull out of Vietnam to stop the fighting at home.

The role of the media affected people’s perceptions of the Vietnam War this, in turn, links the theme of the role of the media and the anti-war movement. Melvin Small argues that by 1967 nearly half of the American civilians had turned their back on the war in Vietnam, ‘As 1967 began 32 percent of those polled thought that intervention had been a mistake. By the end of the year, that number rose to 45 percent: throughout 1967 as the movement continued to promote a wide variety of imaginative national and local activities, increasing numbers of politicians, journalists, and other public figures began to express their opposition to American intervention. One person who spoke out against the Vietnam War was civil rights leader Martin Luther King. The picture attached shows Martin Luther King at the March on the Pentagon. The March on the Pentagon took place on 21 October 1967 it was an anti-war attempt to storm the Pentagon. There were approximately 100,00 protesters there that day however, they were stopped by US Marshals. More famously though was King’s speech at the Riverside Church in Harlem, New York on April 4, 1967. Here King delivered a speech called ‘Beyond Vietnam’ In this speech he said, ‘We were taking the black young men who had been crippled by society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. So, we have been repeatedly faced with the cruel irony of watching Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools. So, we watch them in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village, but we realize that they would never live on the same block in Detroit.’ King’s speech highlighted the racial problems in America and argued that if they did not fight for his rights then why should he fight in a war for others’ rights? This feeling of inequality was already being felt this is shown by groups such as the black panthers who used violence to get their point across. Many people turned out to listen to King’s speech his words in turn were able to spread across America and unite people into turning against the war this is shown by the statistics in Small’s quote. With the American government facing a united front at home there was no way they could win a war this is because they would have no way to fund and fuel the war. If people disagreed with what they were fighting for they would just refuse to go on in the case of some soldiers stopping taking orders from the commanders and start killing them instead of the Viet Cong.

In conclusion, Small is correct in saying that the American people had begun to turn against the war. Not only do statistics show this but the year in which they apply was when the anti-war movement was at its highest. If the American people agreed with the war and had not fought against it there is a high chance, they could have won. The American soldiers were not losing big battles only the small ones. However, the American people were sick of a war that in their eyes had no end and was just a waste of not only weapons but people as well.

Media Bias Informative Essay

In society, media has a unique place that helps in shaping the image people have gained about social and political issues. Currently, media coverage impacts the public by how it characterizes specific events and provides reliable information relating to numerous topics touching society, such as technology, the environment, and risks. According to Herman and Chomsky, media provides potential information and opinion for readers, through the internet, television, radio, magazines, and newspapers (1). The public gains its knowledge base about issues such as science through mass media (Herman and Chomsky 1). While mass media delivers essential information to the public, people can shape it to deliver injustice and misrepresentation through biased coverage of pertinent issues.

Globally, mass media impacts civilization and a closer look at reputable media sources reveals multiple blatant injustices spread through the internet, print media, and TV networks. According to Kennedy and Prat, news media outlets disseminate biased news to respond to higher demand for such news or to fulfill the political affiliations of their owners (1). According to Warf, corporate consolidation in the telecommunication and global media has resulted in fewer prominent media companies (90). Consequently, the influence of media bias on economic and political processes largely depends on a media outlet’s popularity (Kennedy and Prat 1; Martin and Yurukoglu 2). For instance, Fox News has over the years gained substantial acceptance globally, and the news disseminated through this platform has a direct effect on its receivers. Biased news from Fox News has a significant potential to sway public opinion. As Meier indicates, the commodification of mass media has resulted in new mechanisms of exploitation rather than acting as avenues of liberalization (265). Thus, media bias has the potential to form opinions that criticize or praise specific events or issues.

News media networks shape the public’s interests in social and political arenas by making or breaking certain events or individuals. In many instances, news media networks present the people with the news they want to be delivered rather than unveiling the whole truth. For example, during a political rally, many issues happen, and the media only focuses on what they consider essential and overlook the rest of the problems. When the public manages to form a coherent, meaningful opinion from such information, adherents to these media outlets enjoy exclusive benefits over their opponents (DiMaggio 20). As Herman and Chomsky inform, the pressure on media giants from stakeholders, corporate communities, and prominent individuals “white knights,” among others limits their autonomy (6). With such limitations, these giant media houses orchestrate their news feed based on the demands given. For instance, DiMaggio indicates that for politicians supported by these influential individuals, remaining in the media spotlight provides them with the advantage of public persuasion (20). As Newman and Fletcher inform, what people receive from media networks determines the impression they make (5). However, when the public gets deformed news regarding specific policies or political issues, the perception determines the actions they take. It is crucial for media outlets, such as TV, radio, newspapers, and other media outlets, to deliver unbiased news. Nonetheless, many instances of biased news have been observed even from giant media houses (Kennedy and Prat 2). Therefore, the news disseminated by media houses should not only remain neutral but also provide all the necessary unbiased details to leave the news consumers to make impartial decisions.

The current wave of media consolidation shapes the extent of news coverage. With media houses falling in the hands of fewer corporations, business leaders dictate the kind of local and national news coverage priorities rather than journalists (Warf 96). The implication is that in light of the struggle for journalism to remain profitable within a society that embraces press freedom, corporate boardrooms make the financial decisions that affect the kind of news delivered by reporters on news networks. With such a landscape, many issues that the corporate world has no interest in remain uncovered while others deemed profitable and beneficial to the corporate world receive massive attention (Warf 99). The hegemonic theory indicates that media corporations advance the interest of the upper-class corporate world at the expense of democracy (DiMaggio 22). Therefore, by evaluating the existing interconnectedness between the media, powerful elites, dominant social institutions, and the market, media houses have a substantial effect on the political-economic elements that shape public opinion.

The advent of social media and online news has shaped the way people receive their news. However, Pew research indicates that 57 percent of the American population still rely on television, 25 percent of Americans rely on radio, and another 20 percent rely on newspapers as the source of news (Martin and Yurukoglu 5). These numbers indicate that a considerable population still depends on mass media to access their news. Moreover, large media corporations own most of the online news outlets (Newman and Fletcher 7). Further, there has been an increased onslaught in how journalists receive instructions on what they should prioritize in their news coverage. Since these journalists come from elite media companies, online news only has a small gap to cover, with a mild impact since they cannot manage to address the omitted issues adequately (Martin and Yurukoglu 6). Thus, with such gaps in news coverage, people tend to become skeptical about the news they receive from media outlets.

Politically managed news carries substantial dangers to a country’s social, political, and economic landscape. According to DiMaggio, the news reported by media networks provides a material basis for critical analysis and judgment from media consumers (21). However, media reporting molded by special interests only avails the information channeled towards achieving a particular goal. Moreover, the strong ties between the media outlets and the government often render media houses as government subjects (Herman and Chomsky 9). For instance, radio and TV companies require licensing, among other legal processing from the government. With such fundamental soft spots, these companies become potential subjects of harassment and government control (Herman and Chomsky 9). Thus, compromised media networks have become the avenues through which biased news can reach the public.

Distrust of mass media has both political and social implications. While to some extent, skepticism can be healthy for democracy, media presenting the public with distrustful news has the potential to create a higher level of cynicism and disaffection for essential life issues. The consolidation of media houses has played a significant role in creating continued distrust since it lays a foundation for centralized control of news reaching consumers. While the media plays a fundamental role in disseminating underlying issues and shaping a country’s democracy, biased reporting has the potential to create a strong distrust among recipients of the news from media houses.

Works Cited

1. DiMaggio, Anthony. The Politics of Persuasion: Economic Policy and Media Bias in the Modern Era. New York, State University of New York Press, 2017.
2. Herman, Edward, and Noam Chomsky. “A Propaganda Model.” Manufacturing Consent
3. Kennedy, Patrick, and Andrea Prat. “Where Do People Get Their News?” Economic Policy, 3 Apr. 2018, cepr.org/sites/default/files/events/papers/995_Where%20Do%20People%20Get%20Their%20News.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.
4. Martin, Gregory, and Ali Yurukoglu. “Bias in Cable News: Persuasion and Polarization.” Stanford University, 5 Apr. 2017, web.stanford.edu/~ayurukog/cable_news.pdf
5. Meier, Werner. “Towards a Policy for Digital Capitalism?” Digital Media Inequalities: Policies against Divides, Distrust, and Discrimination, edited by Jose Trappel, Nordicom, 2019, pp. 265-284, norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1299036/FULLTEXT01.pdf Accessed 5 July 2019
6. Newman, Nic, and Richard Fletcher. “Bias, Bullshit, and Lies: Audience Perspective on Low Trust in the Media.” The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2017, Reuters institute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-11/Nic%20Newman%20and%20Richard%20Fletcher%20-%20Bias%2C%20Bullshit%20and%20Lies%20-%20Report.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019
7. Warf, Barney. “Oligopolization of Global Media and Telecommunications and its Implications for Democracy.” Ethics, Place, and Environment, vol. 10, no. 1, Mar. 2007, pp. 89-105.

Essay on Truth Reporting in Media

Introduction

The concept of media framing is based on an angle that is taken by a media firm to communicate a specific story. Several people consider news to be completely valuable and the goal still is not usually this method. Many news stories are more value-laden as per the content and manufacturing. Reality is never in reality shown via news however just a small part of reality is developed from many angles. There are several journalists that never, in reality, change the truth nor communicate any lies, however, use specific sources that are focused on specific angles to communicate specific stories by adhering to certain procedures that are immensely selective by nature (Berger, 2017).

Discussion

The media sector is one of the biggest and highly susceptible to massive issues like the integration of corporations, the balance of the truth towards the public interest, social accountability, and overcoming less-than-best customer opinion. Media experts, public association workforce, and interactors from across sectors face strategy-based, financial issues as well as compliance that can rapidly turn into several threats when not correctly expected. Identifying present important challenges particular to the media sector will permit experts to ignore them when right and rapidly move them into options in certain events that they can easily materialize (Bertrand and Hughes, 2017). The important thing to understand is that the concept of communication is considered as a dynamic, rapidly transforming firm or sector.

Corporate social accountability

It has been discussed for ages that businesses are in the business to make money. Big business specifically has a wrong picture for putting the bottom line in the future ahead of associations, international considerations, and certain things ethical in common. The media sector finds are troublesome to report such challenges that can be considered as out of compliance, at the time of trying to advertise what social accountability has been exhibited. When people get news that a firm has managed to conduct business questionably, it develops a majorly challenging case for experts in communication that must or should isolate the challenge that is being reported on without gaining any attention to the whole firm and damage a positive business-focused reputation. Corporate social accountability has conventionally been part of integration into the present business model as well as is also self-governed to agree to specific standards of ethics (Chouliaraki et al., 2017). It can not be part of the structure to deal with unforeseen cases and adverse situations that may come up as well and can thus be taken as completely irresponsible in cases dealt with carelessly.

Public and truth interest

Media-focused reporting, mainly when it is news material can be part of spun, embellished, and also exaggerated to captivate people or viewers, gain focused ratings along with psychological that can interest any person who is exposed to the line of the story. The media industry has a continuous way of issues laid out right before it based on balancing the truth with developing the public-focused interest. All over the world, and mainly in the USA, TV is the main source of public data. On one hand, viewers have a component of skepticism when reading or hearing about the news, once it has been decided the actual truth has been changed in a certain manner, interactions executives lose important kinds of credible information that can never be reinstated, handling to bad consumer opinion for the sector as a whole (Drotner, 2019).