Course : media & communication This paper has a part 1 & part 2 pls write them

Course : media & communication
This paper has a part 1 & part 2 pls write them

Course : media & communication
This paper has a part 1 & part 2 pls write them on two different documents. They both align
Dissertation question: Why is there often only one black character in a supporting role in the American film industry movies, despite increasing diversity in the film industry in the 21st century.
Please read the assignment brief thoroughly to understand what do and how to complete this paper to a high level. All the information you may need will be attached, incase of any additional information pls do message me The assignment brief and mark scheme is attached here so pls make use of it and please especially follow the mark scheme as much as you can as that’s also attached . Please write in UK English not American English . DO NOT USE ANY FORM OF AI

Media Analysis Of The Films The Breakfast Club And Indiana Jones Temple Of Doom: Is Culture And Race Impacting Our View On Media?

Media Analysis Of The Films The Breakfast Club And Indiana Jones Temple Of Doom: Is Culture And Race Impacting Our View On Media?

Introduction

This project allowed me to get in depth with two movies, The Breakfast Club by John Hughes and Indiana Jones Temple of Doom by Steven Spielberg. This project mainly focused on how gender, class, race/ethnicity, and sexual orientation is pictured throughout the movies. By just having an understanding of the different sociological concepts portrayed in these movies, you can further have a good idea of people’s perspective on the society according to human personalities.

Having a good understanding on these topics is very important in our society today. Our society is surrounded with these four components in everyday life. There are many different sociological insights presented in these movies. Some of the most obvious one that are show through the movie are different types of stereotypes about gender and sexualism about women over men. Even though these movies are extremely different, there are still similarities between how the men and women characters are represented.

Learning the cultural stories that permeate our media institution is very necessary to understand so you know the behavior of the people around you and their actions. Having a good understanding about this will help everyone by building a connection and realizing why these actions are being taken place. If you are able to point out the stereotypes in these movies and understand the differently sociological parts, you can apply it to your daily life to understand how people act. Since both movies are old, the way people behave is different than what is shown in the movies today. It was very interesting being able to see and learn the differences of how people acted back then compared to today, but also how it is the same.

Literature Review

According to Kellner, he believes that media helps us change or adapt our view of the world and its values. Kellner mentioned audience reception and use of media culture. This part of the article explains that different types of culture, race etc. “…read texts differently, and cultural studies can illuminate why diverse audiences interpret texts in various, sometimes conflicting, ways” (Kellner 2001).This shows that our culture and race can affect the way analyze texts and other readings. It is important that you understand how difference races will and can impact the way another person analyzes media in our society. This can be helpful when you are building relationship with someone with a different background than you, to understand them and their viewpoint.

In Katz reading, different cultures impact on the way gender is shown in our society. Katzs used a good example of violence shown throughout media. “Violence in the “real” world fails to include an analysis on gender” (Katz’s 1995). When you see any news about either a shooting or any type of violence’s, your brain first thinks of a white male doing this. This is because the culture or the setting that we are in is highly impacted by it. “violence is genetically programed male behavior” (Katz 1995). Our community and the culture around us have set the mind set of people to immediately think of white male when it comes to violence.

According to Klein, Violence is all around the media and weather it is visual or verbal. Media is only talking about certain groups and they are many groups are underestimated and not respected. This reminds me on cliques in high school. Certain groups are given more importance while the other groups are left out. Race and culture can also be another factor of doing this. If there is a certain race or culture in a group that is underrepresented, they might be left out because they don’t fit in the normal norm. “Ostensibly, the contention is that, by rarely or never showing certain types of persons, the mass media, as cultural mechanisms, systematically dispense with imagery and messages associated with these types of persons and, in the process, send a symbolic message to viewers readers about the societal value of the persons comprising that group” (Klein 2009). This support that they are left out because of their race and cultural back group because they portray a certain “message” to the society.

According to Butsch, gender and class are shown in television shows and they also portrayed a bit of stereotype as well. Typically, when you think of a working wife, they fall under the middle-class stereotype. “Working-class wives, such as in Roseanne, who have to work to help support the family, were very rare” (Butsch 1995). In society today this is not true because there are a lot of wives who are working and also supporting their families in order to survive. This puts importance on class and gender. “They are dumb, immature, irresponsible or lacking in common sense. This is the character of the husbands…” (Butsch 1995). Once again where there is a stereotype of the husband being childish and the women being mature and going to work and running the family.

Lastly, in Wiersma reading, she talks about how gender messages are portrayed in Disney films. “children are socialized not only into the rules of society but also into how they should act based on their sex” (Wiersma 1999). From the beginning, children are taught the difference between boys and girls. They have been given set instructions that boys like blue and play with trucks and motorbikes. On the other hand, girls are instructed to like pink and play with dolls and barbies. Males and females are still being outnumbered in cartoons as well. “Males outnumber female voice overs on television commercials and female characters in television cartoons have fewer lines” (Wiersma 1999). This happens because we have gender stereotypes in our society. The stereotype for females is that they are “affectionate, emotional, sensitive and they express romantic interests.” On the other hand, you see males being masculine, heroic and just manly. This shows how gender differences are shown in television.

Film Analysis

This first movie I watched was The Breakfast Club by John Hughes. Each student in the movie had different traits that lead them to fit into a certain stereotypical group. One of the most stereotypical examples that was portrayed in the film was that the “criminal” in the movie had a perspective of the popular girl that she is virgin and also a daddy’s girl in order spends all his money to get anything and everything she wants. Another example is Allision. She is described as the “basket case” throughout the movie. When someone thinks of a female character, there are many different images that come to the mind. However, Allison would be described as someone totally different. She dresses like a goth and wears black and baggy clothing all throughout. Claire who is the “princess” in the movie feels that she does not have much of feminine look and decides to give her a makeover to change her appearance. This shows that sometimes people are not as satisfied with their look and want to be what everyone else thinks they should be.

This film did not show any diversity at all. There was not a single character of any different race than a white American. Keeping in mind that this movie was released in 1985, there are many differences that come to mind comparing this to the other movies today. There was a lack of diverse actor or did the director do this on purpose? The director might have made a subconscious decision of the actor he chose in this film. This movie also did not show much of a sexual orientation knowing that everyone in the movie was straight. This can also be because people did not have much information about different sexual orientations, or they had a negative perspective on it. As you continue to watch the movie, you notice that it is very male dominate. The men in this movie objectify the women by showing that they have more power. You constantly see the men putting down the women and speaking over them. For example, when Claire is having a disagreement with the “criminal” Bender, she suddenly stops talking because she does not know how to further continue the conversation. This is when we see one of the male students in the movie stepping in the conversation. This shows that she was helpless and needed assistance of someone else to support her argument.

Last but not least, class has a huge role in The Breakfast Club. The way they dressed, the car they were driving, and if they pack lunch or not, all concluded to their class status. It was easy to identify that Claire had a higher-class status than Bender, the “criminal”. Claire got everything and anything that she needed/wanted. She didn’t need to try hard in class whereas Bender had to try hard but wasn’t at all. He was very lazy and did not care much about his education. The reason the characters act different is because of their family situations and the opportunities available to them because of that.

The next movie I watched was Indiana Jones Temple of Doom by Steven Spielberg. This movie showed many different examples of sociological insight. To start with, there were many different stereotypes about gender presented in this film. One of the main characters Willie, who is a female, she is shown as someone who fits the stereotype of a blonde female. They are portrayed as being “dumb” and often objectified. In the movie, Indiana jones, who is the main male character, threatens Willie with a knife so that the other men will get scared for her and give him the antidote. This shows that Willie was used as an object in order for him to receive what he wanted. Also, towards the beginning of the movie, a group of female dancers performed for mainly men at a restaurant. They are being used as a form of entertainment for the men in order to keep them satisfied. A lot of the scenes in this movie make the main female character, Willie, appear weak and ditsy and make the main male character, Indiana Jones, appear heroic and a protector. There was a lot of diversity presented in this film. The two main races that were shown throughout the movie were white American and Indian. Both racial groups have equal power throughout the movie, however towards the end the, Americans have more power. This is shown when they escape from the temple where they were being held. However, the Indians had some type of power when they first kidnapped the Americans and kept them in the temple. In this movie, there was not any discussion of sexuality. This is mainly because of the time period this movie was filmed in. Sexual Orientation wasn’t really a topic that was openly talked about which is why the director decided to not include it.

Last but not least, class status is shown with many examples in The Temple of Doom. One of them being when Willie and the other characters visited the village and stayed there for the night. The villagers welcomed them in a respectful manner and provided them food. However, Willie was very hesitant of eating the type of food they offered. This shows that she was very judging of the class level they belonged to and what she came from. Another example is when Willie realizes that she had a hole in the dress she was wearing, she started to explain and also mention that she had bought it from Paris. This shows that she represented some qualities that belonged to a high-class person.

Conclusion/Discussion

To conclude, this project for was important to do to have an appropriate understanding the society we live in today. This topic can be connected to many things such as the different stereotypes that are put on the media and how people respond to those stereotypes. Everyone today judges and makes assumptions about people they see. We usually make these statements according to what race they are, what they are wearing and how they behave in the society. This can sometime have a negative impact on the person being judged.

My results are important to me because it made me view movies in a different perspective. Usually when watching movies, people don’t analyze for a particular topic rather they watch for enjoyment. This made me focus on the different aspects show in the films such as men being heroic and powerful and females being traditional and sensitive. The job of the media is very critical in our society because it shows the society how they and others are being viewed by someone else.

My results support Kellner’s works as well. Kellner had proved that the text shapes and builds the viewers theories and actions. When watching the films and reading the text, there were many points where I would strongly connect with what is happening and what is said. This proves that media has an impact on our performance every day.

If I had the opportunity to do this study again, I would choose an older movie and a modern movie to compare and contrast the growth of different types of sociological characteristics. It was very interesting and challenging at some points to watch a movie with having a motive in mind rather than just for some entertainment. I would also choose a movie that I have not already seen. The Breakfast Club was a movie that I had previously watched so I already had an understanding of the movie. However, watching the Temple of Doom was much challenging because it was a movie I had not watched prior to this project. After completing this project, I feel confident in viewing sociological insight in the media.

Reference Page

  1. Kellner, D. (2001). Cultural studies, multiculturalism, and media culture. In M.G. Durham & D. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: Keyworks (1-13). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  2. Katz, J. (1995). Advertising and the construction of violent white masculinity. In G. Dines & J. Humez (Eds.), Race, Gender, and class in media: A text reader (133-141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  3. Klein, H. & Shiffman, K. (2009). Underrepresentation and symbolic annihilation of socially disenfranchised groups (‘‘out groups’’) in animated cartoons. The Howard journal of communications, 20, 55-72.
  4. Butsch, R. (1995). Ralph, Fred, Archie, and Homer: Why TV keeps recreating the working class baffoon. In G. Dines & J. Humez (Eds), Gender, race, and class in media (403-411). London: Sage Publications.
  5. Wiersma, B. (1999). The not-so-wonderful world of Disney: An exploratory content analysis in full length animated feature films. The Great Plains sociologist, 11(2), 55-72. 44-71.
  6. Hughes, J., Friesen, G., Meyer, A.,Tanen, N., Estevez, E., Gleason, P., Hall, A. M., Kapelos, J., Nelson, J., Ringwald, M., Sheedy, A., Vance, M., Forsey, K., Allen, D., Corso, J. W., & Del Ruth, T.(2015). The Breakfast Club. 30th anniversary edition. Universal City, CA: Universal Studios Home Entertainment.
  7. Spielberg, S., Slocombe, D., Lucas, G., Marshall, F., Huyck, W., Katz, G., Watts, R., … Paramount Home Entertainment (Firm),. (2008). Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. Hollywood, Calif: Paramount Home Entertainment.

Does Media Violence Cause Violent Behavior?

Does Media Violence Cause Violent Behavior?

Introduction to the Debate on Media Violence and Violent Behavior

Although there have been numerous studies and research on the subject, I firmly believe that playing violent video games does not cause violent behaviors. Existing research has not be able to claim with certainty that there is a causal link between playing violent video games and developing violent behaviors immediately after playing or in the near future for that matter. For that reason, it is my belief that violent behavior comes from a predisposition to violence in the player’s genetic make-up, previous exposure to violence (physical, mental, emotional, or sexual), and the lack of parents supervision and guidance when it comes to purchasing and playing these types of video games.

Public Concerns and Notable Incidents Linking Media Violence to Real-Life Aggression

Public opinion claims that playing violent video games promotes violent behavior and causes children to become violent towards their parents, teachers, peers and society at large. Case in point, April 20, 1999, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold enter Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado and open fire leaving 15 dead including the suicide of both shooters and 24 injured. Subsequent investigations into why they did what they did revealed that they were avid video game players and their game of choice was “Doom” , “which Harris modified to be played by two shooters, each with extra weapons, unlimited ammunition, and unarmed victimns who couldn’t fight back” (Chananie, 2007) – much like the event that unfolded that fateful day in Littleton, Colorado. This event further spread society’s belief that violent video games cause violent behavior. Another case which fueled the already heated debate on violent video games causing violent behavior was the second half of the D.C. snipers team. In Lee Boyd Malvo’s trial, a “defense was based on allegations that John Mohammed”, the other half of the D. C. sniper team, “ used violent games, movies and audiotapes to mold Malvo into a killer” (Chananie, 2007) Even though it did not succeed, it did serve as a mitigating circumstance which made the difference between a death sentence and life without parole which, was the sentence that was ultimately imposed on Malvo.

Research Findings on the Effects of Violent Video Games

Researchers started to conduct “population-based epidemiologic investigations of violence in American society, cross- cultural studies, experimental and “natural” laboratory research, and longitudinal studies that show that aggressive behavior associated with media exposure persists for decades” (Pediatrics, American Academy of, 2001). Craig A. Anderson and Karen E. Dill conducted two studies: one correlational, the other experimental using the General Affective Aggression Model (GAAM) as their theoretical approach to both studies. Study 1 measured the amount of exposure to video game violence and the amount of time the participants had played video games in prior time periods regardless of content through the completion of a self-report questionnaire which collected individual difference data as well as data on aggressive behavior, delinquency, and world view. Study 2 participants were assigned to play either a violent or non-violent video game and subsequently played a competitive reaction time game in which they could punish their opponent by delivering a noxious blast of white noise. This constituted their laboratory measure of aggression. They also assessed the effects of the video games on both hostile thoughts and feelings to see whether either (or both) types of games served as mediators of the violent video game effect on aggressive behavior. They stated that Study 1 indicates that in real life, concern about violent video games effect on delinquent behavior, aggressive and non-aggressive, is legitimate but the correlational nature of the study means the causal statements are risky at best because the link between aggressive and non-aggressive delinquency and violent video games could be found in the possibility that highly aggressive individuals are especially attracted to violent video games. Study 2 then focused on short-term effects of video game violence using an experimental methodology which would address more clearly the causality issue. In their summary and conclusion of both studies, Anderson and Dill concluded that the effect of violent video games appears to be cognitive in nature and that in the short-term, playing these games appears to affect aggression by priming aggressive thoughts while in the long-term, the effects are likely longer lasting as new aggression-related scripts are learned and practiced becoming more and more accessible for use in a real-life conflict situation when it arises. (Anderson & Dill, 2000) Researchers, led by Vincent Mathews, conducted a study which included 44 students split into two groups (one group played violent video games while the other group played non-violent video games) for a half hour then gave them tasks measuring inhibition and concentration while measuring their brain functions through a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis. No difference in reaction time or accuracy completing the tasks was found. However, those who played violent video games showed less prefrontal activation associated with inhibition and concentration but more activation in the amygdalae associated with emotional arousal. (Chananie, 2007)

Challenging the Causal Link Between Violent Media and Aggressive Behavior

On the other hand, opposing viewpoints on the matter have done further research on prior studies disagreeing with the results and claiming that there may be other factors at play when it comes to violent behavior on the part of the players of violent video games. Also that “the studies were not conclusive in their findings of a causal relation between playing violent video games and violent behavior.” (Kennedy-Moore, 2015) Eileen Kennedy-Moore mentions in her article in Psychology Today that, Paul Adachi and Teena Wiloughby (2011) found in their studies “it was competitiveness of video games, rather than how violent they were, that predicted later aggressive behavior. Struggling with a game can lead to frustration and aggression, whether or not the game is violent.” (Kennedy-Moore, 2015) Furthermore, “other risk factors”… which may… “include family violence, having an anger-prone personality, poverty, harsh parental discipline, peer rejection, and school problems” (Kennedy-Moore, 2015), “specific personality factors of the individual” (Vessey & Lee, 2000), and “association with delinquent peers, substance use, weak social ties, parental abuse or neglect, and cognitive and volitional limitations.” (Chananie, 2007) may also be factors in developing violent behaviors. For this reason, I will present evidence as to why I believe that playing violent video games does not cause violent behaviors but that instead other factors may very well be at work and that although they may be a part of it, they are not the totality of a reason as to the cause of violent behavior. Factors which include a genetic propensity for violent behaviors, previous exposure to violence and the lack of parental supervision and guidance when it comes to violent video games and how parents allow children these games in their households will be discussed.

Genetic Predisposition and Environmental Factors as Contributors to Violent Behavior

Violent behavior may have its roots deeper into those whose genetic make-up is predisposed to violence and violent behaviors. Studies on violence and violent behavior have found that these “can be triggered in various ways by any number of factors separately or in combination and can, in turn, affect individual behavior regarding violent expression in various degrees”. (Javier, Heron, & Primavera, 1998) Researchers found that physiological/chemical factors in the hypothalamus, the anterior poles of the temporal lobes, the amygdala, and the orbital frontal context which control aggression may be responsible for aggressive behavior but are not adequate to explain such a complex phenomenon like violent behavior being caused by playing violent video games yet they play a role in it. And although “more systematic investigation is necessary, J. Monahan’s analysis (1992) suggests that mental disorders may be a consistent, albeit only a modest, risk factor for the occurrence of violence.” (Javier, Heron, & Primavera, 1998) Social-structural conditions also contribute to violent behaviors of those genetically predisposed to violence by promoting violent content in the media based on the violent culture we live in which is characterized by an appetite for violence and a higher tolerance for it through higher rates of viewing and interacting in violent video games. We as a society have made media violence an acceptable form of entertainment while developing an appetite for more gore, more blood, more guts which perpetuates the cycle. The individual psychology factor states that “If one accepts the psychoanalytic explanation about aggression—that it results from unneutralized aggressive impulses in a person with an immature ego configuration—it is likely that at any level of frustration in an individual with such psychological characteristics will lead to an expression of aggressive behavior.” (Javier, Heron, & Primavera, 1998) In other words, those who are predisposed to aggression will become violent at any given moment if there is sufficient stimulus for frustration present during violent video game playing. Eileen Kennedy-Moore points out in her article in Psychology Today that , “ The effect of violent video games may depend on who is playing them and under what circumstances. …people with a constellation of being easily upset (high neuroticism), showing little concern for other people’s feelings (low agreeableness), and having a tendency to break rules and act without thinking (low conscientousness) are particularly susceptible to the negative effects of violent video games.” (Kennedy-Moore, 2015) Again, this relates to those who are predisposed to violence through genetic make-up but also to those who are exposed to violence at an early age and throughout their childhood.

In an article from the American Academy of Pediatrics’ research on media violence their “research has shown that the strongest single correlate with violent behavior is previous exposure to violence.” They also state that “repeated exposure to violent behavioral scripts (which iResearchnet.com defines as a package of knowledge that a person has about particular kinds of situations that he/she has encountered frequently) can lead to increased feelings of hostility, expectations that others will behave aggressively, desensitization to the pain of others, and increased likelihood of interacting and responding to others with violence.” (Pediatrics, American Academy of, 2001) “Children learn from what happens around them (and to them) from the people most important to them like parents, aunts and uncles, teachers, priests, and ministers because it is in that context that they develop a sense of themselves to others, a sense of right and wrong, and learn respect for themselves and others.” (Javier, Heron, & Primavera, 1998) In an article by Dwaine C. Fehon in the Psychiatric Times, he states that “Researchers have consistently found that children exposed to violence, either as witnesses or victims, are at high risk for having their own patterns of aggressive behavior develop. A considerable body of research points to a number of family, social, and community factors that increase the probability of violence. Specifically, family issues such as inadequate home environments, parental alcohol and drug abuse,witnessing domestic violence, and harsh parental discipline increase the risk for violent behavior in children and adolescents.” (Fehon, 2007) Aggression and violent behavior are learned through a person’s previous exposure to violence whether it is emotional, physical, psychological or sexual in nature. In that light then, we expect the adults in our lives to offer the kind of supervision and guidance which will foster prosocial behavior, empathy and sensitivity in shaping a child’s mind so that if, and when, they are exposed to violence the influence will be less and have little to no impact on their behavior.

The Role of Parental Supervision and Media Literacy in Mitigating Violence

The adults in a child’s life, mainly their parents, have a strong influence in the kind and type of entertainment they are capable of understanding and are allowed to view because of its rating, content and impressionability. Therefore, it is up to us to spend more time monitoring our kids choice of media and that it contains a minimum to none violent content. “Supportive parent-child relationships characterized by communication, concern, and parent-connectedness have been linked to reductions in internalizing and externalizing behavior, including PTSD and aggression. (…) Thus, while supportive families, peers, and schools may not prevent an individual from being exposed to violence, they can indeed protect against the risk of subsequent emotional maladjustment, including the risk of violence.” (Fehon, 2007) “Parents, it turns out, can play an important and positive role in how electronic media affect young people’s lives: they can not only enhance the benefits but also reduce the risks associated with children’s media exposure. Parents who watch prosocial programming with their child and reinforce the messages in different portrayals can enhance their child’s prosocial learning. Such active mediation can include explaining and discussing the moral lessons in a plot, reinforcing the information through rehearsal, and engaging in role-playing activities that elaborate on the information. By helping children think critically about potentially harmful content in the media, parents can also reduce the impact of media violence. Parents can also teach children coping strategies to deal with frightening images in the media. In general, it is essential for parents to monitor the media content their children view and find attractive. Such parental involvement is arguably more important than establishing rules about how much time children can spend watching TV or playing video games. Guiding children’s media choices and helping children become critical consumers of media content can foster the prosocial benefits of spending time in front of a screen while preventing some of the risks.” (Wilson, 2008) Consequently, parents have a huge responsibility when it comes to their children and how much exposure they have from playing violent video games and, as such, should not allow their children to convince them that a popular game which his/her best friend owns and they want is cool and not violent at all. Instead, parents should do their research, check the ESRB (Entertainment Software Rating Board Interactive) rating of the game, seek out others’ reviews and comments on the game but most importantly, if there is a chance to, play the game yourself. See what it is all about and then make an informed decision. Ultimately your child will thank you for it even if its not at that particular moment.

Positive And Negative Aspects Of Propaganda In The USA

Positive And Negative Aspects Of Propaganda In The USA

Introduction to Propaganda: Definitions and Implications

Propaganda is defined in the Merriam-Webster dictionary as ‘the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the reason of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person’.

Whether the consequences of propaganda on society are poor or nice is problem to opinion. Propaganda has been used for the duration of history, taking exceptional forms and using different techniques, and is nonetheless surrounding us and our society. two Propaganda affects us via attractive to our thoughts and to the conformist in all of us. For higher or worse, it influences us to bend our wondering to the perspective of the propagandist, be it a perspective regarding a governmental policy, a political cause, or a corporate issue.

When human beings hear the word ‘propaganda’, a poor photograph automatically looks to pop up in their heads. two Propaganda usually revolves around hiding the whole story with data often being supplied in a biased or deceptive fashion.

Historical Context: Propaganda in World War II

In the United States all through World War II, propaganda was everywhere. There have been posters with Uncle Sam on them telling younger men to enlist in the military and go fight. There were posters with American troopers and American flags, with the phrases ‘Buy War Bonds’ at the bottom. The Japanese Navy devastated Pearl Harbor, and in its wake it left the American people with a ardour for vengeance. The Empire of Japan was once violating broadly conventional human rights in jap Asia, and its authorities had been seen by using the oppressed as a monster that needed to be stopped. The world was once divided between two sides, the majority of the countries of the world helping the Allied Powers. If propaganda had now not been used to rally support for the war, it is feasible that the fighting effort would now not have been as powerful. Perhaps it may want to have been weak sufficient for the Axis Powers to continue building up power all over the world. However, this does now not justify propaganda as something that is truly ‘good’.

The Ethical Dilemma: Positive and Negative Sides of Propaganda

Propaganda nevertheless has its aspects that are seen as negative. Even the instance related to World War II could be seen as bad in the eyes of an Axis supporter. However, in the eyes of the common person, it’s a precise thing. There are nevertheless things viewed as poor elements of propaganda. For example, the American propaganda that used racial slurs towards German and Japanese humans to get the American human beings to hate them. Even extra adverse have been the German pieces of propaganda that slandered Jews and portrayed them as thieves of cash and arrogant, elitist sub-humans; these stimulated aid for the deaths of 6 million Jews in Europe. However, for those who choose to assist the causes others see as negative, the propaganda does no longer appear so terrible to them. It is now not a query asking if it is a proper element or a bad thing, for there will be no concrete reply barring goal proof involving propaganda’s negativity or positivity in regards to its impact on human life.

Still, propaganda is not restrained to the infamous World War II posters, nor is it confined to wartime media in general; it is virtually all round us. Advertising departments in corporations all over the world use propaganda to encourage people to purchase their products, follow for a job at the propagandist’s company, or usually just do what the propagandist desires them to do. The matters humans do or agree with because of propaganda isn’t without delay ordered to them; it is slowly fed into their minds until they are influenced adequate to see things from a positive perspective.

Propaganda Beyond War: Its Presence in Modern Media and Advertising

Today, propaganda is all over the media. If one have been to take their preferred industrial on television, strip it down to its naked essence, and analyze it in detail, they would see that all classified ads use some type of propaganda to influence viewers. For example, the Old Spice advertisements featuring the famous Old Spice Man are a frequent favorite. The business depicts a muscular man explaining in a deadpan, monotone voice the tremendous matters about Old Spice body wash. The surroundings adjustments from a bathroom in which he had supposedly just taken a shower, to a cruise ship, to a countryside the place he is using a horse. On the cruise boats, he holds tickets to a show, and they mysteriously flip into diamonds. He makes use of this as proof that some thing can take place with Old Spice body wash, and then provides casually and humorously that he is driving a horse. The humor in this advert and of the actor taking part in the Old Spice Man appeals to the viewers, which will impact viewers to buy the product, even if it’s only to proceed the joke.

Propaganda is not confined to commercials for purchaser products, either. The media is swarming with political ads aiming to get help for a senator, congressman, or legislation. Less often, however nonetheless very well-used, is propaganda at some point of an election for the head of state, such as a president, premier, or high minister. Propaganda is additionally regularly used to collect assist for a group or cause. A current example is an ad from the Citizens Against Government Waste. The advert suggests a Chinese professor in a college classification hall. ‘Why do brilliant countries fail? The Ancient Greeks…the Roman Empire…the British Empire…and the United States of America. They all make the same mistakes, turning their back on the ideas that made them great,’ he says. The professor proceeds to remark how the United States government tried to tax and spend its way out of a recession, along with authorities takeovers of non-public industries and healthcare overhaul, which supposedly led to huge debt inflicting financial ruin in the United States. ‘Of course, we owned most of their debt,’ he adds, ‘so now they work for us.’ The advert ends with a monotone voice pleading for Americans to be part of the Citizens Against Government Waste to end the government spending that is “bankrupting America”. The ad is meant to exhibit a future the place the Chinese government has taken over the United States, and blames this on the Obama Administration’s strategies of getting the nation out of the recession. The advert uses a mixture of fear, erroneous purpose and effect, and scapegoat, the latter two being used to inspire that fear. When the people are afraid of this future, the group intends to inspire the people to support their cause to fight towards government spending.

Cultural Influence: Propaganda and Its Impact on Society

The impact of propaganda can vary based on the variations in culture, as well. For example, the Jim Crow legal guidelines in the United States, enacted between 1876 and 1965 to implement racial segregation, were primarily based on prejudice. The white men, who had been dominantly in energy at the time, felt that they were most suitable to black men. Part of white American way of life during that period of time was once the segregationist, racist conduct that nearly all people displayed. two While men such as Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr. led the Civil Rights Movement in the 50’s and 60’s, propaganda that was towards their reason was once nonetheless all over the country. two For example, a poster from the Jim Crow era showed a watermelon and an African-American man. He is depicted as a ‘southern darky with material diaper fastened with a miniature security pin and a small nursing bottle’. In posters such as these ones, black human beings are depicted as stupid, primitive animals that are inferior to whites.

Racist propaganda doesn’t just focus on the infamous duration of segregation in the United States. American wartime propaganda against Japanese human beings meant to inspire hatred for Japanese people, even if they had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor, or if they have been second-generation immigrants who didn’t even support the Empire of Japan’s conquest in japanese Asia. two Examples of these are all over the internet, however one instance has a subtitle that reads, ‘Don’t talk; rats have large ears’. In the poster, it suggests a World War II-era Japanese flag, with the pink rays of the solar increasing out from the pink round sun. two In the front of the flag is a Japanese soldier carrying a bloodied katana, portrayed as a rat with large ears. The poster offers the message that all Japanese citizens of the United States were manageable threats to the country wide security of the United States. Posters like this supported President Roosevelt’s decision to put all Japanese residents in internment camps throughout the United States.

Propaganda’s have an impact on spans over quite a few components of grownup life, but an daily eighth grade pupil may ask how it impacts his or her life. Many young people may also say that they do now not care about politics, or that they do no longer think it has an effect on their lives. This is a display of no longer only indifference, but ignorance. For example, Adolf Hitler’s insurance policies regarding Jews in Nazi Germany nonetheless affected children, for the Holocaust led to the systematic executions of women, children, and men; anyone, as long as they have been Jewish, Gypsy, or homosexual.

In contemporary instances in extra developed countries, such as the United States and Japan, there is nothing as extreme as the Holocaust. There is no government that persecutes a positive team of humans primarily based on race, gender, or religion. However, propaganda can impact kids via influencing rules related to public education, health care or the environment. When selections are made that have an effect on the environment, they nevertheless have an effect on teenagers simply as an awful lot as all and sundry else.

Still, it is now not every day that legislation regarding the surroundings is proposed or passed. Propaganda directed at kids focuses more on commercials that target teenagers as consumers. Ads for cosmetic merchandise such as Axe attraction to the teenaged male’s libido, pronouncing that by sporting Axe products they will achieve the sexual desire of females. It is frequent experience that Axe physique spray is no longer magical, however the humor in the classified ads may have an impact on human beings to buy the product to proceed the joke. The aforementioned Old Spice body wash instance has this same effect on teenaged males. The advertisements have an effect on young people to spend their money on cosmetic products, which leads to the companies promoting said merchandise to get richer and richer off of client money.

Another large thing of teenage existence is the idea of ‘cool’. Cool is now not a concrete term. The thought is pretty frequently bought to the hundreds of teenagers. What qualified as cool fifty years ago may also no longer be cool now. Popular matters come and go. In the 1980’s, hair steel or R&B-influenced pop song used to be viewed cool, but then, the grunge movement came and swept up the concept of cool. Then, rap grew to become much more prominent, with the upward push of rappers such as the Notorious B.I.G. and 2Pac. With the coming of the twenty first century, pop stars such as Britney Spears, and in even greater recent years, Lady Gaga, grew to become prominent. These matters all have some thing in common. They originated as something new, and as some thing special from what was once famous before. Sometimes, being cool capacity going in opposition to the norm. People went in opposition to the norm with grunge, a sub-genre of punk, and they went in opposition to the norm once more with rap, and as soon as once more with pop song with lyrics of letting loose and having fun in youth. Some matters are marketed as new and different, and as quickly as humans begin catching onto these things, the thinking of ‘cool’ has made its sell.

Reflections on Propaganda: Its Role in Shaping Civilization

It is hard to imagine lifestyles except propaganda, in particular when so many components of existence are influenced via propaganda, such as political alignment, the purchase of consumer products, assistance for a war, cause, or group, or the concept of cool. However, in a hunter-gatherer sense, none of these things are ultimately imperative to our survival. Propaganda did not have to exist when all people did was once hunt to feed themselves and their families. Neither did client products, or all of this debate on the money of tax payers, or authorities spending. When the foundations of modern existence have been analyzed, one would possibly come to the conclusion that propaganda has shaped most of what has made civilization what it is today. When specialization was first being introduced, possibly propaganda was used in that humans were forcing others to obey them, or perhaps they could tell others that they have to band together in opposition to a common foe to sooner or later create civilizations that would final millennia.

Without propaganda existing, absolutely everyone would possibly be an individual. They would not base their selections on how they see different people, or how they would be considered in by using their peers. Perhaps government would no longer be as effective, and governments would unexpectedly give way due to a lack of assist from citizens. Perhaps corporations that produce consumer merchandise would give way due to a lack of interest in the merchandise that are manufactured. Perhaps a notion of morality would now not exist as no man would be trying to have an effect on other people with his perspectives.

The word propaganda is almost usually stated with a terrible connotation to it. It’s nearly continually shown in a negative light. But barring it, the place would civilization be? Propaganda has made humans go forward in corporations to improve civilization, however perhaps people would be better off with an extra herbal way of life, with pure individuality and returning to the roots of human civilization: searching and gathering, besides the notion of civilization, or human beings influencing different people to see matters a positive way barring character thinking. Perhaps humanity would be better off no longer trying to manipulate life, and as an alternative simply letting matters in life pan out the way they do and letting the evolution of man take its course. We as a technology may additionally never see the day the place that type of hunter-gatherer life-style returns, however the future is most truely unpredictable.

Media (TV, Radio, Press) And Social Media As The Ways Of Influencing Public Opinion In Democratic Country

Media (TV, Radio, Press) And Social Media As The Ways Of Influencing Public Opinion In Democratic Country

INTRODUCTION

In a democratic country, public and its opinion matters the most because democracy itself means of the people, by the people and for the people. According to lord Bryce public opinion is a term that is commonly used to denote the aggregate of the views, men hold regarding matters that affect or interest the community. Thus, understood it is a mixture of all sorts of different nations, belief, fancies, prejudices, aspirations. It is simply viewing of people on general issues. Public opinion has a very important place in democracy as government in democratic country is elected by the help of public opinion. Political parties in these countries try to make public on their side so that they get the majority of vote and win the election, as their existence is based on public. Public meetings, education television and cinemas, press, social media, religious institutions etc. are the various ways from which public opinion can be created. For a fair and good public opinion which will help in growth of a country, people should be educated and broad minded as they will be able to have a proper analysis on the issue of discussion and through that they can have a practical solution. Including education, that country should be free from issues like poverty and unemployment and media of that country should not be biased. Social media is a form of media which is via internet and in a world full of technologies it is accepted as the most because everyone is on social media and there are high chances of a person getting influenced by social media then any other form of media. The influence of public opinion is not confined to politics and election. It is a powerful force in many areas like culture, art, fashion, public relation and so on. Influencing people of a democratic country is very easy and media plays are very vital role in it.

MEDIA

Role of media is bigger than every other source which can influence public for creating a public opinion. Media plays a very vital role in informing the public of what is happening around our country and world. People are dependent on media for every news as it has a power to shape public opinion in whatever way it wants. What they get from media is what they believe as true. Media of country should be free and not biased as a biased media can influence people in a wrong way. People of a country deserve to know the true news but in the presence of biased media it is not possible. A free media will criticize government in many way but at last will get a sound and fair public opinion which will do good to the country but if a media of that country is controlled by a selfish political party, communities etc. than it will be difficult to make a sound opinion because then media will only show what these selfish parties wants public to see. It will make a huge chaos in country. Therefore, a good media is like a lighthouse to democracy. People can be influenced through media in many ways via television via radio, via newspaper, via press etc.

TELEVISON

television is a very crucial source from which we get the news of what is happening in world every day. It has become a part of our day to day life. In television there are so many media channels which talk about every day news and tells us about the major issues happening around the world, we as our daily routine watch those channel and make our opinion through that. For example, if we take CAA case, some news channel was against it an some were for it people watched them and through that made their opinion.

NEWSPAPER

If we talk about newspaper then it is too a part of our daily life. Newspaper contains a vide range of information related to local news, state news, country news and even international news and create political consciousness. It even entertains general public via giving games like sudoku in it and even by adding fashion and Bollywood news. An individual can get everything in newspaper. Newspaper can be called as “book of democracy”. Articles are written in it, news is written in it, and by reading these things we make our opinion.

RADIO

Talking about radio, it is also a very effective source which tells us about each and everything whether it is news, weather forecast, songs, discussions, public meetings etc. people listen to radio while traveling, people who don’t have television listen to radio to get updated. In a country like India radio is much more effective as here most of the people are illiterate and can’t read newspaper or they don’t understand English so they can’t hear to news channels which speak English. It even entertains people a lot.

PRESS

It is one of the most powerful media that influences public and create their opinion. It is just a small form of media. It educates people and thus help them to create their opinion by informing people about day to day news. The editorials influence both citizen as well as government. Even citizens bring their problem to press so that it could reach to government easily. It is a link between government and citizen and that is why press of a country should be free.

These are some major sources through which an individual makes its opinion in a democratic country and to make a right opinion these sources should be free, as, if they will be free public will be able to make a just and fair opinion and through that country will get developed. Media is just like a link between public and government as when government announces new laws and policies they communicate them to public through press and if, when public doesn’t like what government has bought they start opposing it by raising their voice which is wither they protest or they right it on internet which is carried forward to government via media. Media helps general public to stay in touch with government which is very important for democracy.

SELF – REGULATION FOR MEDIA

The freedom of expression is a very essential component of our individual development, to improve ourselves and this democracy. Mass media was invented for this only so that everyone could express themselves and could get better knowledge of what is happening around the world. Self-regulation is combination of standards setting out the appropriate codes of behavior for the media that are necessary to support freedom of expression, and process how those behaviors will be monitored or held to account. It is generally their own code of conduct, which guides them(media) and tell them what to do and what not. Self-regulation preserves independence of media and also protects it from those selfish government. It will be able to work more efficiently once media understand its power and don’t get scared of government as media has a lot of power through which it can influence people, even I think it’s the only power which can influence the opinion of an individual. Self-regulation tells media it’s priority which is citizen of its country. It helps media to work freely without any biasness. In many part of commercial life, self-regulation is entrusted to a body of industry professionals to administer. Inside a media organization the classic approach is to have a media ombudsman, employed by the media company to receive and investigate complains by newspaper readers, or listeners or viewers of radio and television and can work on it. Self-regulation for a media is very important as democracy is all about people and media helps those people to know what is happening and to raise a voice against something which is not good for them and their nation. Talking about how effective it has been for media, self-regulation is very effective for media as it gives media a clear path to walk on, it makes media much for stronger and independent of those selfish parties, communalist and ministers who try to buy them and show citizens fake news. They try to violate citizen’s fundamental rights but via this media does not let them do these stuffs. As we can see that self-regulation is over government regulation for media, its benefit is that increase in efficiency, incentives, reduced cost, incentive of compliance. There is a press council in India which takes care of every news house and make sure that no one is involved in some illegality. The Indian television media has its own self-regulation known as news broadcasting standards authority (NBSA), it keeps a check on news channel and make sure that no fake news, paid news or any kind of illegality happen. Though this is been made still there are cases where we get to hear that this was a paid news, journalist is absent, this was fake news so in my suggestion there should be some changes in NBSA and it should be made more stricter because if talking about this scenario of COVID-19 people are caged at home and if this time too they are getting fake news this will make a huge chaos, people will get influenced by something wrong which will be harmful for nation, not even this scenario in every scenario media should be taken care of and it should learn this that their first priority is their citizen.

When we talk about media it covers a vide range of communication methods and in this century, which is full of technology and internet. Social media is the best source through which media can do its work and help public to create its opinion.

SOCIAL MEDIA

Internet technology especially social media has made this world familiar with a new way of communication. You can get each and everything on social media, just type it you will get it. Nowadays everyone has access to social media and it is very easy to communicate with everyone. Social media apps like Instagram, Facebook, twitter etc. allows their user to post their views on what is happening around the world, it gives freedom of expression to each and every user using those apps. There are political leaders, social media influencers who have million of followers, so when they post their views people read it and then make their opinion on the topic. There are so many recent examples that proves that social media is one of the most important sources through public can create their opinion. as we all are in lockdown where we cannot go anywhere and cannot meet anyone because of corona virus which came from china. So now people are coming on social media and are posting videos, pictures, blogs in which they are telling their views about this situation and what can be done to get rid of this situation, these blogs, pictures and videos are seen my million and billion of people who read and see these and get influenced by them. Recently Sonam Wangchuk an Indian engineer posted a video in which he appealed to everyone to stop using Chinese software’s and hardware’s, he has a lot of followers and now his video is getting viral and everyone is getting influenced by him and are deleting Chinese apps from their phone. Another example is that there was a huge conflict between youtubers and tiktokers that who is best and this heat people who liked YouTube more started posting on social media to report and uninstall tiktok and by this many people reported tiktok on play store and the rating came down 1.2 star. From these examples we can see that how social media creates an opinion among general public. Apart from this there are public discussions held on app like Facebook, twitter where people can express their views and can even create an opinion. when a political leader or journalists etc. tweets something and people read it, they give their views on that. Nowadays there are several news pages which are on social media and are influencing people by posting news online. Getting update of what is happening around the world is quite easy now as people can get news by randomly scrolling in their social media. Social media is a very sensitive platform as from younger generation to old generation everyone is using it, it even make a very strong influence among people but if people post something wrong it can create a huge chaos among everyone and can create a false public opinion which can harm the entire nation so everyone has to be very careful on what they are watching and what they are reading as public opinion is all about what people of nation are getting to see and watch and for that media should be fair.

CONCLUSION

Media and social media are that much important for a democratic country as food to a person because these two sources help to create a public opinion and in democracy public opinion is everything because government is chosen by public. Through different ways of media which are television, newspaper, radio , press, internet etc. public get to know what is happening around the world and through that they make their opinion that is why it is said that media should be just and fair because if media will show fake news, public will get influenced in a wrong way and because of that whole nation can be in chaos. Media act as a link between government and general public. Media has its self-regulation which acts as its code of conduct which sets some standard for it and protects it. Social media is a form of media which is via internet and as in this era, it is totally about technologies so people are mostly staying online each and every time and through that they get so many news and discussions which help them to make their mind and create their opinion. if we conclude everything then media is the most crucial thing which can make or destroy any democratic country as

Negative Effects Of Media Violence On Youth

Negative Effects Of Media Violence On Youth

Media violence is become one of the top investigated topic these days. Media which is considered as best source of communication has made our lives much easier. Rising technology is making progress and new gadgets each day are there to catch our sight and make our life colorful. But, on the contrary, if we have a glance on the other side, the same media is responsible for causing violence in our lives and it has its negative impacts more than its beneficial outcomes, this developing media has been becoming the biggest source of social violence nowadays. It is the source of correspondence or devices used to store and convey data or information. The term alludes to parts of the broad communications interchanges industry, for example, print media, distributing, the news media, photography, film, broadcasting, and promoting.

According to research it is found that youngsters are spending more than 33% of their time utilizing media, for example, online video or music — about nine hours overall, as indicated by another investigation from the family innovation instruction non-benefit gathering, Common Sense Media. Children between the ages of 8 and 12, the normal is about six hours out of every day. ‘Our world is changing and kids are spending a lot of time with media — and they are doing it in a variety of ways on many platforms,’ said James P. Steyer, founder and chief executive of Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization that focuses on helping families promote safe technology and media for children.

Children in their leisure time, spend most of the time watching television and playing games. Children learn from what they see. When they are exposed to violent games, they are more attracted towards them and they try to imitate those things in the same way, hence, develop aggressive behavior, nightmares, anxiety. Dr. Dimitri Christakis, who is executive of the Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development at Seattle Children’s Research Institute. Said that, Violence generally when it is genuine however regardless of fictional it is unreliable, it is very terrible for kids with respect to their age. The children with aggressive behavior when grow up and become teenagers, the outcomes are much horrible. These teenagers are more likely to commit crimes and cause violence. Media brutality represents a risk to general wellbeing in light of the fact that it prompts an expansion in genuine savagery and animosity. Research demonstrates that anecdotal TV and film brutality add to both a present moment and a long haul increment in hostility and viciousness in youthful watchers. TV news viciousness additionally adds to expanded brutality, primarily as imitative suicides and demonstrations of animosity. Computer games are plainly fit for delivering an expansion in animosity and viciousness for the time being, albeit no long haul longitudinal investigations equipped for showing long haul impacts have been directed. The connection between media brutality and genuine savagery and animosity is directed by the idea of the media substance and attributes of and social impacts on the individual presented to that content. In any case, the normal in general size of the impact is enormous enough to put it in the class of known dangers to general wellbeing.

Inappropriate content at the wrong time can change our acts and deeds. According to WebMD A young person who watches sensual content are immensely bound to have sexual relations at their early age. Many youngsters get influence from movies to start drinking at very early age. Parents should be very much concerned about their children when they are young as their little lack of concern may cause them big troubles. Some way or another playing ruthless computer games can build an individual’s forceful considerations, feelings and conduct in day by day life. According to the survey in 2010, one psychologist found that “disclosure to savage computer games is a hazard factor for expanded aggressive behavior, forceful acts, and for diminished in sympathy and flatly conduct”.

Propaganda And Its Background

Propaganda And Its Background

Propaganda is a form of persuasion that is aimed at influencing, manipulating and controlling the behaviors of people; usually towards a cause or position. Many trends of propaganda can be detected throughout world history. In 1939, Hitler used anti-semitism propaganda to help unite the country against the Jewish. In 1861, Americans used propaganda against African-Americans during the civil war. Even dating back to 1622, the Roman Catholic Church used propaganda against the Protestants. Propaganda has made it possible for humans to act in such ways, we never thought possible.

During World War II, some believe the goal for Hitler was to spread the Aryan race, invoke German culture and in the end, take over the world. With Hitler being a man of authority, he was able to impose his views on the German people. Although his views may be seen as erroneous, his way of words were convincing. Hitler used the Jewish as a scapegoat; the reason for Germany losing World War I. Hitler preyed on the weaknesses of his country’s people; how broken they were after losing the war. Germans were angry, hurt and felt betrayed by their prior leaders; He was going to change it all. Hitler promised the German’s a life of freedom, a life without poverty, and a life where their culture would become dominant. Propaganda was the easiest way to gain everyone’s attention, from one side of the country to the other. Hitler stated, “Controlling information was just as important as controlling the military and the economy.”

The slander against the Jewish culture was so extensive, German’s actually believed the Jewish to be of lesser value, subhuman and dangerous. All of the films, newspapers, posters and even comics were so convincing, it brainwashed the Nazi’s into believing their mass genocide was for a good cause.

Another so called ‘good cause’ people fell trap to, was in our own country. During the Civil War, American press from both the North and the South, published propaganda. The South used propaganda to help convince the American people slavery was acceptable. The North used propaganda to attempt to unify the people. Southern states used propaganda to place fear into the American people; stating that ‘mixing races would be the end of mankind’. The South also targeted American’s patriotism, stating African-Americans were incapable of being good soldiers. The South claimed, if an African-American were to fight against another black individual; they would side together instead of fighting for the cause. The North also played on American’s patriotism, but in the sense that unity of all mankind would be most beneficial. The North demonized the South, making them all appear immoral and evil. One way the North used propaganda was on envelopes; stamping pictures of either enslaved black men or naming the South’s best soldier, a ‘thief’. The South created propaganda drawings of black men becoming friends on the battlefield. Furthermore, both sides depicted one another as a truth, which was incorrect.

Truth is seen either one way or another, in religion. In 1622, during the Reformation, the term propaganda, was actually coined by the Catholic church, in efforts to discredit the Protestants. The Catholic’s started by responding to the first strike of propaganda; from the works of Martin Luther. Martin Luther, a priest, broke off from the Catholic religion to change the way the church was ran. He started creating pamphlets against the Catholic church, picturing people ‘showing their rears’ to the Priest, stating they didn’t need another man to interpret the Bible for them. The Catholics were outraged; they responded with another form of propaganda.

The Catholic Church blamed the Peasant War (a war in which 100,000 to 300,000 peasants and farmers were killed), and all the turmoil caused by it, on Martin Luther. The Catholic Church was less successful in spreading their propaganda, than the Protestants. Catholic’s tried to spread their views by using word of mouth; influential people preaching at congregations. The Protestants had more gain with their use of propaganda; printing pamphlets that could not be easily made extinct. Both religions had views they tried to impose on individuals; it depended on their execution with how far it spread.

Propaganda is a very powerful tool that has been used throughout centuries. It is a technique of fear; gaining the trust of individuals based on lies or exaggerations. Propaganda encourages a particular response, usually presented in facts that are selective; lying through omission. Commanders have influenced their troops in wars; creating more destruction if there were never to have been propaganda slander. Religious leaders, convincing their clergy on the ways the Bible is viewed. Stereotyping and bias can create the widespread of hate; manipulating the minds of people to despise one race, or religion. “By the skillful and sustained use of propaganda, one can make a people see even Heaven as Hell or an extremely wretched life as paradise.” -Adolf Hitler. With every propaganda trend, there is more hate and disgust to follow.

The Influence Of Media On Teenagers’ Performance

The Influence Of Media On Teenagers’ Performance

This chapter reviewed the relevant literature on the effect of mass media on adolescents. The purpose of this review is to provide a background that would be appropriate for understanding what is currently known about the study. The theoretical and empirical information considered the influences of mass media on socialization of adolescent students. The influence of parental attitude on the use of mass media of adolescent students are also discussed.

In today’s world, media has made a very special place for itself in our lives. It would not be an exaggeration that today, media has become as important as food and clothing. Today different types of media is also very much helpful to educate and make a socially aware nation. The communication forms can be radio, television, cinema, magazines, newspapers and Internet-based web sites often play a varied and vital role in our society. They play an important role in increasing public awareness and formation of their views and attitudes toward certain issues. There is no denial that media is playing a very significant role in making the world smaller. Through various mediums of media whether it is radio, television, newspaper or internet, we are able to connect with large number of people around us. Thus the media informed the public about important social, economic and cultural issues as well as different problem of our society.

Television

Television is first of all based on a kinetic image, graphics and sound elements. In his book, “Fenomenul televiziune” (“Television phenomenon”), Ion Bucheru states the fact that a live broadcast or an event described shortly after it took place, is seen, felt, lived by the viewer, that becomes with or without his will, an active participant in this conduct. (Bucheru quoted in karim 2016). Romanian press offered some examples, especially in the non-adult age, a teenager bay that stabs his sister to death, after watching a horror movie, an 18 years old that raped a girl, declaring after that he only wanted to act as he many times saw on T.V. (Adevarul, July, 17th, 2015). In other words, sitting in front of the T.V. for countless hours does not always degenerate in such dose of violence in one’s social life, but it does have an influence on the brain capacity to gather information and to maintain a good work performance, encouraging a sloppy lifestyle, this being a passive activity. Here the numbers are very concerning, 70% of the young ones saying that after spending time in front of the television makes them grow weak, tired and they develop an attention deficit which makes them unable to concentrate on their homework or on reading.

Media Impact

Neelamalar & Chitra (December, 2009) stated in Kumar (2015) described that not only T.V. every mass-Media instrument has a Huge Impact on our Way of Thinking. Media is a one-faced communication provider. It tells you what is there, and it pulls you into its grip, but it does not suggest you or tell you what problems you may face later with it. Media succeeds in creating a current successful impact on its viewers, but it does not provide sufficient information about the after effects of such a success. So we should watch out for who is trying to hunt us down!! (Suman Shafi, 2012). According to a recent poll, 22% of teenagers log on to their favorite social media site more than 10 times a day, and more than half of adolescents log on to a social media site more than once a day. Seventy-five percent of teenagers now own cell phones, and 25% use them for social media, 54% use them for texting, and 24% use them for instant messaging. Thus, a large part of this generation’s social and emotional development is occurring while on the Internet and on cell phones. Because of their limited capacity for self-regulation and susceptibility to peer pressure, children and adolescents are at some risk as they navigate and experiment with social media. Recent research indicates that there are frequent online expressions of offline behaviors, such as bullying, clique-forming, and sexual experimentation, that have introduced problems such as cyber bullying, privacy issues, and “sexting” Other problems that merit awareness include Internet addiction and concurrent sleep deprivation.

Political Socialization of Adolescents’

A. Moore 2017 explain the Role of the Media on the Political Socialization of the youth. In order to decide which party to affiliate with, which candidates to vote for, etc., people need to decide what they believe in. This is where political socialization comes in. Political socialization is “the process by which people acquire political beliefs and values.” (Bardes, Shelly, and Schmidt, 2014)

At the beginning of the 20th century, before the widespread use of the radio and then television, the media was limited to newspapers. Later, there were very few radio and television stations, and even fewer people who could afford to own them. Information was very limited. So the public was pretty much spoon fed what the government wanted them to know. There was a sort of unwritten code that the media didn’t “tell all.

McDevitt and Chaffee (2002) believe that “Adolescent children are not merely receptive to political stimulation; they possess the power to transform patterns of family communication in ways that benefit themselves and their parents.” They call it a “trickle-up influence.” According to Spark Notes editors (2010), “Although the bulk of political socialization occurs during childhood, adults continue to be socialized. Political socialization occurs in many ways:

  • Family: Families mostly impart political culture unintentionally by acting as examples for the children. Very often, people end up with political beliefs similar to those of their parents.
  • School: Most children learn about their country at school, usually through a curriculum known as civic education. This curriculum trains young people to be good citizens, often via history, government, and social studies. Although these lessons are usually basic, many of the key ideas and values of a society are imparted through school.
  • Peers: At all ages, friends and acquaintances will influence one’s beliefs.
  • Religion: Different religious traditions have very different values, and one’s faith often significantly influences one’s political views.
  • Social and economic class: The social class to which one belongs shapes one’s views.
  • Minority status: Members of a minority group sometimes feel like outsiders, and this feeling of isolation and alienation affects their attitudes toward society and government. This is particularly true when the minority group is treated either better or worse than others in society.
  • Media: The power of media is increasing with the spread of 24-hour cable news networks, talk radio, the Internet, and the seeming omnipresence of personal audio and video devices, so the influence of the media on political socialization is no longer confined to the young.

Mass-media in Socialization: Lam Lik Jay 2016 describe the role of mass-media in socialization. Socialization is the primary tool in which culture is transcended; all beliefs, norms, traditions and values are passed down to every individual born into the society. Traditionally, it occurs mostly through social interactions with family, friends and the society of which we are members. Today, with the advancement of technology and the rapid growth of media outlets, interaction amongst individuals are not what it once was. We now spend much more time on our electronic gadgets, namely our computers, televisions, tablets and of course, our smartphones. With the average teenager spending more than 10 hours consuming media each day (L. Jay 2016), mass media is arguably becoming the most potent agent of socialization in our society today.

Mass media, which now includes Internet sources such as new sites, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and a myriad of new mediums, was previously just newspapers, magazines, television, radio and billboard ads. Regardless of the changes in platform, none of these media sources are avoidable.

Rance Crain, former senior editor of Advertising Age, states that “only 8% of an ad’s message is received by the conscious mind. The rest is worked and reworked deep within the recesses of the brain.” Thus, we are unknowingly being socialized by the media that surrounds us every day.

Living in a society where we are almost always consumed by electronic devices, Internet media such as online newspapers, magazines, Facebook posts and even celebrity tweets are becoming the main source of information for the younger generations and older generations alike.

A recent study by Tecmark, a marketing agency based in London, has discovered that the average user in the UK picks up their phone more than 1,500 times a week. It’s not just changing how we interact with each other, but also radically transforming the way people are socialized. We are now so focused on the lifestyles of the rich and famous that there were multiple articles about Ariana Grande’s change of hairstyle with the headline “This is not a drill,” as if it was shocking news. What does it tell you about our society when a girl taking her hair out of a ponytail receives more media coverage than a virus that threatens the health of the entire world?

When all we see are female celebrities on the news, it presents a whole new myriad of problems. Men like myself who have been constantly exposed to images of these undoubtedly airbrushed photos of “perfect” women, proceed to judge real women more harshly, holding them to a physically unattainable ideal of beauty, and women who have been constantly taught that their value lies within their appearance, work towards and inexplicably fail to achieve this ideal, face an array of mental health problems.

Well, men are increasingly being objectified, too; walk into a fragrance store, or a men’s underwear section, almost every packaging will have a man with unbelievably chiseled abs, and perfectly trimmed or no body hair.” What I failed to realize was that when women are objectified, they are usually framed as fragile, submissive and sometimes even infantilized. However, men are shown in strong, assertive, aggressive positions, never made to seem small, or vulnerable. And these all inadvertently affect our perception of men and women; it’s subtle enough that we don’t notice it, but it’s always there, working subconsciously into our thoughts and actions.

The advent of mass media has made possible the reproduction of information on a massive scale via the medium of both the print and electronic media to inform, educate, entertain, as well as transmit values thus establishing the mass media the most powerful communication force ever created by man. Considering the degree of information flow available through the mass media, and its possible consequences on the child’s learning capability, it has become pertinent to take a critical look at the diversified role of the mass media in the process of socialization especially at the childhood stage.

This shows the extent to which the mass media has become a major socialization agent in our contemporary society. This also makes the monitoring of what the children are learning very difficult. Overtime, this intense and frequent interaction between the child and the media has served to reinforce the efforts of the family and the school, but in most cases, it weakens and dilutes family and school influences in the socialization of the child.

The media may be directly utilized for education and indoctrination, as in educational television programs. Or the exploitation of all forms of communication in authoritarian societies where the regime systematically try to spread and sustain the values they approved. As message multipliers, the mass media should transcend all the other agents in the socialization process because of its ability to increase the number and speed of message delivered, as well as the size of the audience reached in very little time. It is reasoned that given the tremendous powers especially in situations where the mass media have been adopted as integral part of the learning process, its socialization capacity must be enormous.

Agent of Socialization

Socialization, though a lifelong process occurs intensively along the first years of life. In other words, at the time when children begin to learn the language, detailed rules of behavior and the value system of their culture. Of course, all electronic media function as part of national culture too, but they come from beyond the immediate family circle and its community linked support.

Chinoy noted that, the chief agency of socialization is usually the family or kinship group. But contemporary studies reveal that children spend most of their time with the media like television, video, radio, mobile phones, tablets, internet etc. than with their parents and thus making questionable, the saying that – the family is the most primary social institution in society.

Effects of Media

Hurlock listed five effects of television on children, firstly, television watching cuts into the time available for other play activities, especially outdoor play with other children. It also leaves little time for creative play or different forms of amusement. Secondly, television present material in such an exciting and vivid way that schoolbooks can hardly compete with it for children’s interest and attention. As a result, they often find schoolbooks and schoolbooks boring. Thirdly, characters in television are usually presented as stereotypes and children come to think of all people in a given group as having the same qualities as the people on the screen. This influences children’s attitudes toward them. Fourthly, since children are imitators, they feel that what has the stamp of approval of a television program must be an accepted way for them to behave. Because law-abiding heroes or heroines are less glamorous than those who win attention by violence and other unsocial acts, children tend to use the latter to identify with and imitate. Fifthly, many children believe that anything said on television is true and that the television announcers know more about everything than parents, teachers and doctors. Hurlock believes that all types of amusements of childhood like television watching is commonly hazardous to personal and social adjustments because, first, more time is spent on it than other forms of play and, it is less often supervised by parents and other adults than other forms of play.

The research of Musa Abu Hassan (1996) found that communication media had a profound effect on the youth change which involved three aspects of cognitive, affective and psychomotor. The dissemination of unethical information through the broadcast programs. The elements of violence and sex from import media, with hugging, kissing, hand-held, and eye-dressing women scene are widely broadcast by electronic media (Hamismo, 1991). In addition, the media become the reason of attraction and repulsion that influence hang out of adolescents’ attitudes. The attraction factor is the entertainment provided, the atmosphere is comfortable and prestigious. The push factor is the home atmosphere that is uncomfortable, noisy, narrow and not entertaining at all.

Despite the ease and sophistication of the world today, it affects the performance of an individual, especially the teenager who is still a student. This effect can come in short term instantly or in the long term that happens slowly. Media and communication are capable of producing good and bad impact on human beings based on the message they are carrying and it is also capable of forming and characterizing personalities according to the references (Aminudin et al., 2009).

Media’s Power And Persuasion In Europe

Media’s Power And Persuasion In Europe

The main objective of media regulation is to enhance the benefits of media while reducing any harmful effects. Media practises who have large audiences are viewed as beneficial to society and are promoted by regulation. Media regulation is the control or guidance of mass media by governments and other regulatory bodies. This regulation is implemented through laws, rules or procedures and can have various goals. An example of this is to protect ‘public interest’, or encourage competition. .The main targets of media regulation are the press, radio and television, film, music, the internet, mobile phones etc.

Governments around the world have set their views on the role of media in society. Their aim is to maximise the benefits of the media. For example, some governments provide funding for film production to boost the nation’s film culture. On the other hand, the Government may restrict the circulation of ‘extremist’ political views and reduce illegal pirate radio stations.

There is a lot of controversy and disagreement surrounding how the media should be regulated. People have different views on how the media impacts people, whether it is harmful or beneficial. For example, some people claim that porngraphy should not be regulated because people should be free to explore their sexuality. Other people claim that pornography degrades and exploits women and should be censored.

Main forms of media regulation:

A form of media regulation is Direct government control. It is unusual for governments to take complete control of the media, however, countries with governments who enforce strict laws at the expense of personal freedom, often directly intervene in the practises of the media industries. For example, the Chinese government closely supervise forms of media and the Chinese media regulations allows the government to stop particular news stories by claiming that they expose state secrets and endanger the country. However, in democratic countries, the government may take direct action to eliminate news stories that could threaten national security.

The most popular form of media regulation in Europe are Independent statutory regulators.

The independent regulators are given the right to enact legislation on specific aspects of media regulation. In the UK, Ofcom regulates the communications industry. So if a member of the public makes a complaint about a television programme, Ofcom will conduct an investigation and take appropriate action. In the US, the Federal Communications Commision oversees the communications industry. Another form of media regulation is audience pressure. If consumer’s find news material offensive or potentially dangerous, they may campaign against it. To avoid campaigns against forms of media, some record labels put parental advisory stickers on their albums.

Factors that make a news event worthy:

There are different factors that make a news event newsworthy. If an event occurs near the consumer, it will have a greater impact on their lives. Likewise, if the event includes someone well-known such as a celebrity or Politician, it can have a larger impact on people’s lives and will get more media coverage. It can also depend where the news event occured. Although most people use the internet to get news coverage, we are still more likely to care more about something down the street than across the world. Also, when the news contains topics and events which are current, it is considered desirable news. Consumers are used to receiving the latest updates through different devices such as Mobile phones, and there is so much news about that old news quickly becomes irrelevant.

The Media Impacts On Tourist Destinations

The Media Impacts On Tourist Destinations

Abstract

Tourist destinations are currently pursuing more distinction in an increasingly competitive market, within which image is a decisive element in tourists’ destination selection. This research studies the impact of media channels, such as television, radio, magazines, newspapers, and magazines on the destination image and how it is delivered differently from one media platform to another.

Introduction

The rapid growth and versatility of the tourism industry during the last five decades, but also its fragility, has spawned a number of obstacles and opportunities in tourism marketing for tourist destinations and venues. (Echtner & Ritchie, 2003; Khodadadi, M.2013).

It is not a simple fact to overlook that the recent spur in tourism can be related to the media. Information and data are accessed using it and an education regarding the plethora of interesting attractions found around the globe. ( UKEssays, 2018)

According to the United Nations Tourism Organization (UNTO), the media plays an immensely significant role in putting tourist destinations on the rise in Eastern Europe and Central Asia onto the global tourist itinerary, thus helping to develop local economies. (UNNews, 2007).

Mass media plays a significant role in “shaping the individual and collective consciousness by organizing and circulating the knowledge which people have of their own every-day life and of the more remote contexts of their lives”(Adoni & Mane, 1984, p. 325). The media, particularly the news, and due to their high reliability and market penetration, may be the only image-formation representative capable of radically changing an area’s image in a short period of time (Gartner, 1994). “It is well recognized that people receive information about tourist destinations through a huge variety of media, gain knowledge about these areas and construct their images, which then form the basis of their destination choices (Mercille, 2005)”. (Khodadadi, M.2013).

Tasci and Gartner (2007) suggest that the media tends to be more instrumental to image formation since, as aforementioned, their credibility and reliability are relatively higher when reaching mass audiences, in comparison to the destination-originated information. News channels have the capability to create general knowledge about a destination, and are out of a destination’s immediate control. The authors also argue that, “organic information sources and especially news media tend to have an even greater impact when they portray a dramatic event occurring at a destination, including human caused disasters such as political upheaval, riots, terrorism, insurgency, crime, war, and natural disasters” (Tasci & Gartner, 2007). However, even though the significance of media in the creation and development of destination images, this perception has not been thoroughly examined in the field of tourism research. . (Khodadadi. M. 2013).

Image, as a factor in the traveling decision process, has been broadly examined. People hold differing perceptions of different places, which, once evaluated, become a main piece contributing to site selection. “Several studies have demonstrated that destination images have considerable influence on tourist choice and behavior” (Chon, 1991; Chen & Tsai, 2007; Pearce, 1982). According to Jenkins (1999) and Fakeye & Crompton (1991), defining the term “tourist destination image” while aiming for accuracy may pose as a challenging affair. Jenkins (1999) proposes that the most commonplace definition is the one proposed Crompton (1979, p. 18), “The sum of beliefs, ideas, and impressions that a person has of a destination”. . (Khodadadi. M. 2013).

Taking this definition into account within the tourism industry, there are different factors that affect the potential tourist to make his or her decision to travel. In order for the tourist to reach such a verdict, a basic need must be present; a need to travel. As soon as the decision is made to fulfill that need, there will be a need for information on different destinations. Then, the decision maker would look at the different options that he or she has, compare and contrast those options, before they actually decide where they want to go. “In this process, people make use of different information systems that influence their final decision”. (Kotzé, F.C. 2005)

According to Ahmed (1991), destination marketers spend great efforts to institute positive images for their locations. This is because of the high level of competition among destinations, especially with the development of media channels nowadays. A destination’s image is extremely important because it majorly influences a tourist’s decision-making process. This process is typically influenced by the tourist’s needs and wants, previous holidays, recommendations, available funds, among others (Lamb et al., 2002). “What a tourist thinks about a destination’s image is strategically more important than what a marketer knows about the destination. The key to creating a successful image is convincing tourists to view a destination in the manner intended by the destination’s marketers” (Ahmed, 1991; Kotzé, F.C. 2005)

The authors (Gartner et al., 1992) examined that media has a positive influence on destination image formation when the stories presented by the channels introduce or describe a particular place. They stated that the media’s influence would be enhanced when a receiver of the media message had uncertain or insufficient knowledge and information about the destination in question. Earlier studies also found the negative outcome of bad publicity on the destination images, as well as tourist visits to the destinations previously communicated via the media. (Park, J. 2015).

Baloglu and McCleary (1999) described that the relatively negative image that Egypt holds among Americans had formed because of the news coverage about terrorism in the country. Similarly, Peel and Steen (2007) discovered the negative impact on specific destinations. For example, the effect of news coverage about national crime rates on Australia’s image.

Furthermore, the authors found the sharp impacts of media coverage for crisis and natural disaster situations such as the tsunami disaster in Southeast Asia (Henderson, 2007) or terrorist attacks in Bali (Hitchcock & Putra, 2005; Park, J. 2015).

These studies explicitly indicated the significant role of media in the formation of tourism destination image, and suggested that media relations in the tourism industry should be well-applied to avoid potential negative or undesirable images. (Park, J. 2015).

The sources of information relative to tourist activities have changed significantly over the past fifteen years. This is primarily due to the impact of contemporary technology. Second, it is due to the change in tourist consumer behavior, and thirdly due to the rise in the number of tourist destinations. Lastly, this change is due to the growing level of competition between different destinations globally. (Molina, A. Gómez, M. & Consuegra, D. 2010).

“The image a tourist may have of a destination can be quite personal, as it depends on each tourist’s individual perceptions of the place” (Bigné et al., 2001; Gallarza, Saura, & Garcı́a, 2002; San Martín & Del Bosque, 2008). The opinions of tourists worldwide are highly personal and subjective in nature, that is because they can base their views of the same destination on varying experiences, which in turn depend on their personal thoughts and emotions. This has caused many researchers to investigate the mechanisms of a tourism destination image, generally elaborating on the cognitive and affective components. In the minds of tourists, whilst the cognitive image represents the tourists’ knowledge and beliefs of a particular destination, the affective image signifies their emotional responses towards it (Gartner, 1993; Beerli & Martín, 2004; Pike & Ryan, 2004; Royo-Vela, 2009; San Martín & Del Bosque, 2008, San Martín Gutiérrez, & Rodríguez del Bosque, 2011; Smith, Li, Pan, Witte, & Doherty, 2015).

When the cognitive and affective images are combined, the overall destination image is created (Baloglu & McCleary, 1999), which is comprised of personal characteristics of the destination, and integrates both tangible and intangible elements. (Alcocer, N. & Luiz, V. 2019)