Category: Linguistics

Instructions for Speech 1:
An epiphany is a life-changing insight brought about

Instructions for Speech 1:
An epiphany is a life-changing insight brought about by some significant event. Discuss in a 3-4 minute presentation, an epiphany you have experienced. Concentrate on the nature of the insight and the event that brought it about. Be sure to indicate how the epiphany changed your life and whether or not the change was for the better.
You may write out your introductory and concluding paragraphs, but the body must be in the form of an outline. The body of the speech should not be read word-for-word, but you may freely refer to your outline. You MUST submit a copy of the outline prior to your speech. The outline should be submitted on or before Wednesday of next week, via the Week 5 Assignment dropbox.
Speech #1 OUTLINE
Introduction
Give brief history of myself
Body Content
History of education background
Financial Constraints
Employment (discuss employment type)
Graduation
Conclusion
Thank everyone for Listening

Professor sent the paper (see attached file) back for revision with following co

Professor sent the paper (see attached file) back for revision with following comments:
The paper needs defence:
Where is literature review (i.e. theoretical framework.) which is commonly written before the empirical part and later employed in  text analyses?
Highlight the discussion of such theories which might be used in the empirical research. Waiting for the paper.
Based on the comments above I’m looking for experienced writer who has written thesis and literature review and clearly understands what my professor wants from me and is capable to revise the paper’s literature review part accordingly.
Based on my professor’s feedback, it seems that while my current literature review does discuss various aspects of post-apocalyptic literature and linguistic analysis, it may not explicitly connect these discussions to a well-defined theoretical framework. A theoretical framework in a literature review serves as a foundation that guides analysis, helping to explain why and how I would approach the topic in a certain way. It seems my professor is looking for a more direct and clear articulation of the theories underpinning my analysis.
To improve my literature review based on the feedback:
1. **Explicitly State the Theoretical Framework**: Begin the literature review by clearly stating the theoretical framework. This means identifying and explaining the main theories or concepts that my paper relies on. For example, writer might want to focus on theories of identity formation in literature, theories of linguistic representation in dystopian narratives, or theories about the role of language in shaping themes and characters.
2. **Integrate Theory with the Existing Literature**: As writer discuss various studies, articles, and opinions in the literature review, directly relate them to chosen theoretical framework. Show how these studies support, challenge, or expand the theories you are using.
3. **Highlight the Relevance of the Theories**: Explain why these theories are important for understanding ‘The Blue Book of Nebo’. How do they help in analyzing linguistic patterns and their impact on themes of survival and identity? This connection needs to be clear and explicit.
4. **Prepare for Application in Analysis**: While you’re not doing the actual analysis in the literature review writer should set the stage for it. Indicate how these theories will guide analysis of the novel.
Fromthe descriiption, it seems that current literature review might be more focused on discussing various perspectives and findings related to post-apocalyptic literature and linguistics. To align with my professor’s expectations, writer should reframe this discussion within a specific theoretical context.
In summary, this literature review should not just be a collection of related studies and findings but should also clearly articulate the theoretical lens through which hypotetical analysis will be conducted.

Ultimately the Linguistic Autobiography will be a brief essay of 750 – 1500 word

Ultimately the Linguistic Autobiography will be a brief essay of 750 – 1500 words (2-3 pp) about your personal history and experience with language (what you turn in for Stage 2). Whereas our initial course modules focus on the formal aspects of language, this assignment is an invitation to focus on its function and how it relates to your membership in communities.
For this stage, though, the goal is just to collect your thoughts by completing a questionnaire. Course staff will comment directly in your submitted response (see “Formatting” below) with follow-up questions or suggestions to help you build your observations into an essay.
Provide answers to the following questions with as much detail as you feel comfortable sharing.
Where are you from(China)? Where have you lived(USA)? Who have you lived with(my parent who doesn’t speak english, they speak mandarin)?
Which of these social details do you think may have influenced the way you use language now? Are there other social details that you think are relevant or important?
Is there a language variety you used to know as a small child that you don’t speak so well anymore? (*see note below these questions for some links about the term “language variety”)
Is English, especially the standardized variety used in instruction at this University, something that you learned in school? What do you remember from your experience in learning English?
Do you remember particular comments or instances where your language variety was commented on? Have you ever been praised for your fluency in a standardized variety of language (including but not limited to English)? Have you ever received criticism because of not using a particular language variety?
Are there other languages you learned in school that have been important to your personal development? Are there any you aspire to learn? If so, why?
Is there anything else you’d like to add? Do you have any observations about your personal history and its relation to language that is not covered by the prompts above?
*You can have a look at these pages to get an overview of what I mean by “language variety.”
1. https://www.thoughtco.com/language-variety-sociolinguistics-1691100#:~:text=In%20sociolinguistics%2C%20language%20variety%E2%80%94also%20called%20lect%20%E2%80%94is%20a,a%20language%2C%20including%20dialect%2C%20register%2C%20jargon%2C%20and%20idiolect.
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variety_(linguistics)
3. https://wmblogs.wm.edu/annecharityhudley/my-linguistic-autobiography/
4.https://christinemallinson.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/my-linguistic-autobiography.pdf
5. https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~wlabov/HowIgot.html

Instruction are attached. You will need access to the book which I will give to

Instruction are attached. You will need access to the book which I will give to you. the easiest access is through the ReadAnywhere app in the app store. I will upload a screenshot of the username and Password.

Compose an in-depth literature review that explores hyperbole in a general sense

Compose an in-depth literature review that explores hyperbole in a general sense, placing specific attention on numerical hyperboles. Use the provided papers for analysis while incorporating additional sources as necessary.
My research explores the use of hyperbole in Kuwaiti Arabic (KA), focusing on numeral expressions to represent exaggerated quantities. It is the first study of its kind within the field of KA dialect studies, utilising data from various speaker groups, with a primary source being a corpus of KA hyperbolic expressions from X (formerly known as Twitter). The study finds that phrases related to numbers, accumulation, and quantity are particularly effective in crafting vivid hyperboles. In KA, common numerical quantifiers like sittīn ‘sixty,’ imya ‘hundred,’ and malyо̄n ‘million’ are often used hyperbolically. Additionally, KA speakers invent their own terms for large, indefinite numbers, akin to English’s ‘zillion’ or ‘gazillion.’ This includes original creations and borrowings from English and neighbouring Arabic dialects, such as dabalāt ‘doubles’ and ahlēn ‘two hellos.’ The research shows that hyperbole is a significant aspect of linguistic creativity and plays a key role in language evolution. It highlights the diverse ways in which KA speakers use hyperbole, and the impact of these expressions on the language’s development.

Read the text about types of CLILL https://www.teacheracademy.eu/blog/clil/ and

Read the text about types of CLILL https://www.teacheracademy.eu/blog/clil/ and answer the following questions

Please fix the provided paper according to the professor’s comments and the pro

Please fix the provided paper according to the professor’s comments and the provided paper requirements and referencing and style guide.

Look at the instructions for further details, the writing rubic is also attached

Look at the instructions for further details, the writing rubic is also attached below, be sure to follow both instructions and rubic.
THE GRAMMATICAL POINT THAT I HAVE CHOSEN IS PREPOSITIONS,
Prepositions, in this case, simple prepositions
I want to work on this grammatical point because prepositions, especially simple prepositions looks easy, but it is hardest to learn in grammar
I want to know and research The reason why simple prepositions the hardest to learn in grammar, case study on the preposition “on” (I have also attached the case study below), polysemy and multiple meanings
Be sure to include new understandings and insights gained about this topic about the english grammar

Hi this is LING 001. PLEASE read the chapter and answer each question separately

Hi this is LING 001. PLEASE read the chapter and answer each question separately. this assignment has 4 part to answer. I uploaded the pictures of the models AND the 4 Parts of the questions.

The research should discuss syntactic facts about Negation in standard Arabic. T

The research should discuss syntactic facts about Negation in standard Arabic. The. Arabic negation markers are: [maa / laa/ lan/lam/ laysa (agreement)/and ʁair] all of them are included in the attached articles.
(If you need Arabic data let me know, just write them in English and I will provide the Arabic equivalents with translation)
-Propose a descriiption based on English negation and the data you observe, it is not necessary to consult previous accounts (observations).
-Compare English and Standard Arabic side by side to show that Neg must appear in different positions, including syntactic tree diagrams.
– What is the source of the treatment of negation in English?
-What is the basic order in Standard Arabic?
-What is imperfective and perfective verbs in Arabic?
-What does it mean if a sentence is verbless in Arabic? Does it mean that there is a copula, but perhaps the copula is phonologically empty? [Why is it relevant what the phonological form of the copula is?] Do we have a convincing argument that the copula is absent when it is not overt?
-How can we explain that ‘laysa’ can agree in gender (and possibly other phi-features)? Propose an account in terms of features that agree or complex elements for both tense and phi-/gender-agreement. That should go beyond an observation of the facts.
-Does this show constituent (as opposed to clausal) negation? Show the structures in a sentence.