4000 words literature review
2000 words for the procedures
Procedures should b
4000 words literature review
2000 words for the procedures
Procedures should be clear state every thing in details
Literature review should be very high quality citations
Follow the guide
Select an authentic text, identify the VP’s and classify them into simple or com
Select an authentic text, identify the VP’s and classify them into simple or complex (at least 10). For each VP, identify the main verb (MV) as well as its auxiliaries and/or modals, if any. Submit as a PDF file. Please remember to include the source of the text.
Make sure it has real verb phrases from the authentic article you choose. Provide me with the article and highlight the verb phrases. Be careful you dont get confused with Phrasial Verbs and Verb Phrases. Attached is an example.
There seems to only be one question but it’s likely multilayered. Let me know if
There seems to only be one question but it’s likely multilayered. Let me know if more money needs to be released.
Thank you!
Review the file below, a table that highlights physical changes associated with
Review the file below, a table that highlights physical changes associated with aging. Choose three organs or systems that are listed in the table. Then, using information from your text or other sources, describe ways that you could alter the rate of aging in the three organs or systems you selected. Explain how the strategies you described alter the rate of aging.
File 1 is the instructions for the assignment | File 2 is the proposal for the a
File 1 is the instructions for the assignment | File 2 is the proposal for the assignment, please write the assignment according to it | You MUST do acoustic analysis using Praat (https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/), here is the Google drive link of the 4 recordings and please use it for Praat: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iOCtL5xknPRQ7bAuayiDR_JHXn-zR6Nn/view?usp=sharing | Format: Font type: Times New Roman – Font size: 12 points – Line spacing: single – Referencing style: APA 7th| Please site professional outside sources (as many as you like) in the essay, you must cite your sources, and you must include a full works cited, and Please DO NOT PLAGIARISE others’ works or use any AI to write the work. I am also a university student so I will know it. I will REPORT and CANCEL the project if you violates this|
Hello, I have a class activity in a Word document to turn all the given paragrap
Hello, I have a class activity in a Word document to turn all the given paragraphs to APA formatting, with all the references also.
i have a video to explain everything needed, its very simple and doesn’t take time, but I need someone whos expert in APA formatting.
1. Read and Follow CAREFULLY the files to finish the assignment. 2. plagiarism i
1. Read and Follow CAREFULLY the files to finish the assignment. 2. plagiarism is NOT allowed 3. DO NOT use AI to generate the assignment
The instructions for assignment will be File 1. The main pdf file for this synta
The instructions for assignment will be File 1. The main pdf file for this syntax is File 2 (if you don’t know Cantonese please use mandarin instead). Here is the Google Drive link to the lecture notes: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1vkQsAWq2SCcUdGS2nnAYkPj2N1xumF20?usp=sharing Please DO NOT PLAGIARISE others’ works or use any AI. I am also a university student, if you plagiarize others’ works or use AI, I WILL KNOW, and I WILL CANCEL THE PROJECT and REPORT YOU.
languages tend to vary in how they morpho-syntactically mark non-Agent semantic roles—in particular, Themes and Experiencers. For this question, let’s focus on just Experiencer arguments.
Look for examples that show how Experiencer arguments are morpho-syntactically encoded. (Hint: think about which type of verbs have Experiencer arguments). Describe what specific morphological (case marking? Agreement on verbs?) and/or syntactic (position in the sentence) features these non-Agent arguments display, and compare them with an example of a “canonical” two-argument sentence—with a transitive verb that has an Agent argument and a Patient/Theme argument. Are any of the morphological features on Experiencer arguments different? Are any of the syntactic features on Experiencer arguments different?
General guidelines:
Write brief, but full, descriptions. That is, I would like you to not simply “respond” to each of my questions above, and be done with it. Rather, connect, and organize, your findings into a coherent, readable explanation of these features in your research language—imagine a short science piece that can be read by another linguist.
You will want to:
Start your description with an opening statement about what your research language does, or does not mark, in relation to these features.
Even if the morpho-syntax your language does NOT mark a certain feature: you need to show good examples that conclusively demonstrate that this feature is NOT marked, AND state exactly why these examples demonstrate that the feature is not marked.
If the morpho-syntax of your language DOES mark a certain feature: present the system (i.e. the set of all values under that category)—if the system is not too large, list all the values. If it is large (say, a language has multiple dozens of noun classifiers, present a number of representative examples. Either way, as you present the system, show good examples, and discuss any key features.
Finally, don’t forget to provide an in-line citation for each example cited from your sources, to show which page it is from.
Learning to observe linguistic behavior in action, at a more micro-level
Observation paper 2: Linguistic observation
Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to continue the process of learning to observe linguistic behavior in action, at a more micro-level than the last assignment. In addition, you will gather linguistic data to analyze it in light of what we have learned in this section of the class.
We frequently do not notice just how much information there is in a simple linguistic exchange, and this exercise will allow you to focus on a very small piece of data, and to record as much information about it as you can. Once again, we are making conscious a process which takes place largely unconsciously every time we enter a conversation with another person, or every time we observe a conversation among other people.
There are two parts to this assignment.
First: Observe, with care, and in detail (for example, you absolutely need to document, to the best of your ability, what people actually say and how they say it – it will not cut it to say, “They talked about the party they went to last night.”).
Second: Step back from your data, and from your assumptions about what is going on in the conversation, and to apply the course concepts to your data to come to understand better what is going on. The reflection at the end gives you a chance to integrate the two and consider your role as observer and analyzer in the process.
Observations
You will engage in three observation sessions, done in one of two ways (depending on what kind of access you have to real people interacting in real time).
You can either:
Take a notebook and writing implement, or a computer, and find a place where you will be able to watch people interacting with one another without being overly intrusive or noticeable. Do not use any recording devices unless you have explicit permission to do so from the people you are observing (if you feel that you wish to record, please talk to me about permissions, etc). For two to three minutes, record everything that you can about one interaction (dyads are easier and are preferable for this assignment). This can include clothes, (presumed) gender of the speakers, age estimates, location, how they sit relative to one another, eye contact, movements, etc, as well as a reasonable approximation of the words used, and the topic discussed. Estimate the number of turns taken by each participant in the conversation (see why a dyad is easier?). Use a space of time after the intensive two to three minutes are up to record the details of the observation; be sure to include the context (where you did the observation, anything you might know about the general culture of that place, etc). Do this two more times, for a total of three observations.
Or choose three two to three minute segments of two people talking in some kind of media environment (this must be real-time talking, so, e.g., Twitter, Instagram, etc, posts will not work; Facebook live, etc, on the other hand, will). I strongly urge you to stick to dyads, for all the same reasons expressed above. If you can choose interactions that are as close to real-world conversations as possible (as opposed to scripted television shows, for example), please do. Although please do remember that all public-facing performances are just that – performances, and are therefore, to at least some degree, scripted and or consciously managed. If you do choose to work with segments of a scripted show, please be aware of that and reflect on the implications of that for your analysis. Once you have chosen your three segments, gather the same data from them as discussed above.
Content and Format:
The notes you take on these dyadic conversations are the data that you will then analyze.
Read and reflect on your notes. As you write your observation paper, use specific examples from your notes and apply the concepts from the course to your data.
Did you see any of the phenomena we have discussed in class (e.g., greetings, a level of formality or informality, the use of conversational genres, discursive consciousness, radical reflexivity, narratives of belonging, etc)?
How do you know that is what you were seeing? Be sure to explicitly refer to and utilize the criteria from the articles to analyze your data.
Consider the data-gathering experience itself (as the authors of all the articles we have read do). Did it go the way you expected?
What assumptions did you find yourself making about the speakers’ gender, ethnicity, age, relationship, etc?
Was there anything about it that was easier or harder than you anticipated?
Did you notice anything that you were surprised by? Were any expectations fulfilled by the behavior of the people you observed?