An Art of Literacy: Life of Pi by Yann Martel

This is a story by Piscine Molitor Patel. People may know Piscine as PI as well. I mean, are we even supporting this? First, there are three different religions, then the science belief and now sharing a 26-foot lifeboat with a crippled zebra, an orangutan, a hyena and a male Bengal tiger named Richard Parker? I took the liberty of talking to some of my old pals, and surprisingly enough, I realized we were actually not communicating.

Some of them believed this and stood strong to the ground. By this, I mean, there was no convincing them otherwise. Without food, shelter, clothing? Do you people even realize these are the basic needs needed by an individual to survive? According to one of my friends, this was possible. She said, do you believe in the bible? If we are told, Jesus survived for forty nights and forty days, what else is not possible? PI had faith. All he did was to hold up firmly to this faith. Together with the little knowledge acquired from science, surviving was not that hard. This paper seeks to enhance argumentative and professional writing using literary work. It also looks into the possibility of writing about animals in such a captivating and catching way.

This left me thinking I must say. I was confused and nearly convinced beyond doubt that this was just not working or rather an art of literacy. Trying to come to terms with reality and bear in mind how literacy works symbolize our environment, the natural setting, and our day-to-day happenings. Then Daniel, a freelance writer by profession and a pal of my, had this to add, Literacy art is all about creativity, its a gift, inspiration and at times, an imagination! so where was he driving to? Was he against the art or supporting it?

According to Daniel, art was part of the imagination. He thought the writer was inspired but looked for a better way of delivering a message. The events covered in the book are as though they happened, but the fact remains they are all fiction. There went my knight in shining amour. At least I had some sharing the same page I was. Daniel used his knowledge gained from his profession to explain himself (Martel 45).

In my line of work, at times when I am bored, if find myself talking of boredom. When I see something fascinating outside, I talk about it. However, at times one just feels he has had enough with real life issues and immediately turns into fantasies! I say this out of firsthand experience. At the end of the day, they are all literacy arts and you surely have nothing to lose! One thing we always keep at the back of our mind is the fact that, either reality or imagination, there is always a message available to pass.

Daniel truly divided the group! Questions were there to be answered. Some even turned to rhetoric. Obviously, there was this one question lingering in everyones mind. Where do we classify life of Pi? I say we classify life of Pi as a pure fiction and not reality. This once more brought up mixed reactions and Bianca could not take it anymore. She stood up and let everyone else know her own point of view (Rogers).

After she had cleared her throat, she began, when we look at the formalist approach of life of Pi, we are told it checks more of the form of the work rather than the content! Why are we ignoring this? All we have talked about is nothing more than the content. I mean, even after Daniel trying to draw u people back to the drawing board you still do not get it! Let us start by looking at the relationships of the characters. They all play a big role in the work.

Us as the readers of the work are obligated to find that reason. Take a closer check on the cadence to have a clue on why that character exists in the work. You may take words as they are literally used. However, do you know the way a person uses words in the work gives those words a completely different spin from the normal meaning? Before we decide anything concerning what Life of Pi entails let us not rush into conclusions (Rogers).

Works Cited

Jordan, Justine. , 2002. Web.

Martel, Yann. Life of Pi. New York: McGraw Irwin, 2003. Print.

Rogers, Henry. Writing Systems: A Linguistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. Print.

Life of Pi Religion

The book The Life of Pi is largely centered around Pi’s religious beliefs. Although Pi does heavily rely on science, religion is used in many parts of the book and is a source of strength for Pi. Pi is able to weave together Hinduism, Christianity, and Islam together in order to be able to love God as much as he can. The author, Yann Martel, defends the choice to believe in multiple religions at once and the compatibility of religion and science through Pi’s admiration for both religion and zoology. Pi’s faith and beliefs are the most important things in his life. Pi is a vegetarian because he loves and respects all of the things God has made. Pi has gone through a long religious journey with many obstacles in order to be so strong in his faith. In every one of these obstacles, he has put his faith in God first, including all of the hardships he endured while being lost at sea.

Pi’s religious journey began when he was born, as he has been a devoted Hindu since he was born. Pi will never stop believing in Hinduism as it taught him how to see the beauty around him and in the world. Through everything, Pi has gone through and no matter what situation he is in, Hinduism helps him in finding the beauty and positivity in his life, as well as the world. Pi even saw the beauty in the ferocious tiger he survived his adventure out at sea with. Hinduism gave Pi such incredible strength to where Pi could see the beauty in a Bengal tiger that could’ve eaten him! Pi encountered his next religious belief as he was walking by a Christian cathedral. He entered, thinking he would be told to get out, but instead found a priest who listened to him and explained to him Christianity’s religious message. The priest taught him how Jesus was love and that everyone is welcome in the eyes of Jesus. Pi liked the way Christianity loved God and decided to be baptized. Christianity played a role in Pi’s hardships as well, the religion taught him how to suffer and see the spirituality in suffering. This allowed Pi to see his suffering abroad the lifeboat as a spiritual experience and help him cope with the hardships abroad the lifeboat.

The next religious belief Pi encountered was Islam. Pi encountered Islam when he encountered a Muslim baker who took a break from the conversation that they were having to go pray. Pi is struck by the beauty of the prey rituals in Islam and decided to ask the Muslim baker to teach him how to pray. Islam was another religion that helped Pi during his suffering, the religion taught him the concept of “brotherhood”. This allowed Pi to be able to deal with Richard Parker and even making Richard Parker into a companion. Through this concept, Pi sees the beauty in companionship and even takes time to ensure Richard Parker survived with him on the lifeboat. Pi’s faith gives Pi the strength to confidently express his beliefs and not his beliefs be changed by anyone. Even when his own religious leaders and parents question him about his religious beliefs, he stays strong in his faith and simply replies that he is just “trying to love God.” Pi believes if everyone would stop fighting about which religion they believe in and rather just love God with their whole heart and soul, the world would be better.

While aboard the lifeboat Pi’s beliefs were still first priority for him. When he killed his first fish, he cried for it was incredibly difficult for him to reject his vegetarianism belief. During Pi’s ordeal out at sea Pi continues to do all of his spiritual practices, of course conforming them to his current situation. To venerate God through Christianity, Pi has a solitary mass without bread or a priest. To venerate God through Hinduism, Pi uses turtle meat as a Hindu offering. To venerate God through Islam, Pi continues to pray to Allah 5 times a day although he does not know in which way Mecca is. In doing all this Pi receives great comfort and hope. Pi finds his faith being tested every day and battles with despair but he always is able to overcome it because of his faith. Pi even grants Richard Parker the title “God’s Cat”. In surviving his ordeal out at sea, Pi will always have incredible faith in his beliefs and in God.

The religious significances in the Life of Pi are many but what is clear is that Pi’s religious beliefs have an incredible influence in the story and in Pi’s suffering. Pi’s unselfishness when it comes to God allows him to pursue multiple spiritual paths. This, in turn, allows for Pi to understand the joy that comes with abundance. Pi is able to combine 3 religions, all of which he admires, and takes away many beliefs from each one. All 3 religions separately and collectively play a significant part in his survival aboard the lifeboat and in helping him move on from the trauma he has endured from the “adventure” out at sea.

The Portraits Of The Main Characters In The Rime Of The Ancient Mariner And Life Of Pi

In contrast, Pi and the Mariner have different opinions regarding the values of life as a result of their actions and emotions during their times at sea. The wedding guest (yes, he is still listening to the Mariner) interrupts the story, questioning the Mariner in fear that he too is a ghost based on his ghostlike features. The Mariner insists he is not a spirit but the only person not to die. After this, the Mariner continues telling his story.

The Mariner is left alone, surrounded by death, pleading a saint to take pity on him. He questioned why all these men were killed but not the slimy creatures who were his only companions. The Mariner tried to pray but could not because he heard evil speaking in his ear. All he could do now was shut his eyes trying to avoid the horrifying scene around him.

Once again, night had fallen over the ship. The Mariner noticed water snakes illuminating the waters of the sea. Watching the snakes brought a sense of happiness to him. Not to his knowledge, the Mariner’s joy blessed the water snakes. In this moment, the Mariner as able to pray and the albatross’ body fell from his neck into the water and sank.

In conclusion, in Life of Pi and ‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’, the main characters both experience physical suffering as well as a connection with God, however their views regarding the value of life conflict each other. Two people facing the same situation have similar emotions however can have opposing actions, as witnessed in Life of Pi and ‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner.’

‘The Rime if the Ancient Mariner’ is the longest poem of Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s work. The poem is the captivating story of a mariner who is sharing his life story. This poem is divided into seven parts due to its length to create an easier read. In Life of Pi, Pi feels a strong trust in God during his time in the Pacific. ‘The combined shock of the solid land and cool water gave me the strength to pull myself forward onto the island. I babbled incoherent thanks to God and collapsed’ (Martel 287)

During the final portion of their time at sea, Pi and Richard Parker discover an island in the middle of the mighty waters. Pi believes God directed the two castaways in the direction of this small piece of land which would ultimately save the lives of the two and is forever grateful.

The Ways Journeys Impact Person’s Perspective And Approach To Life In The Rime Of The Ancient Mariner And Life Of Pi

Physical journeys involve different types of obstacles. They provide opportunities for travellers to extend themselves physically, intellectually and emotionally as they respond to challenges and learn more about themselves and the world around them. The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, and Life of Pi, are both examples of how physical journeys impact said persons perspective and approach on life.

Physical journeys make people change and it guides them further into the future, much of life of pi is all about action and the impossible adventure of struggling to survive at sea stranded. His journey not only involves surviving with a tiger, but also starvation and the other physical challenges that he overcomes, pi is soon forced to challenge his beliefs when he is forced to kill fish, as he identifies as a vegan. And soon partakes in actions that he believes are against him, the will to survive also physically challenges pi and makes him a stronger character as he’s had to grow as a person and overcome his beliefs in order to survive . From the start we know that Pi overcomes this journey and survives to tell us the story, but keeps tension throughout the whole ordeal. Samuel Coleridge in his poem The Rime of the Ancient Mariner too has examples of Physical journeys and the characters developing their identities, The mariner is bombarded with constant challenges and dangers that he has to overcome, one being killing the albatross.

In contrast to Lee’s film, Life of pi, pi too faces many challenges, however Pi deals with these challenges differently to the Ancient Mariner in ‘RIME’. Pi is on a lifeboat with a tiger after the terrible shipwreck resulting in his whole families death, the use of dark lighting and non digetic sound of thunder, to set the terror of the storm. When Pi is stranded at sea, he is tested by his extreme struggles, but he also experiences the sublime in the grandiosity of his surroundings, pi has time to think about what to do and how to come out of this struggle,. All external obstacles are stripped away leaving an endless circle of sea and sky. He tells his interviewers two versions of his survival, then asks which one the prefer, Obviously the officials disbelieve the animal story.

Pi’s time on the algae island is one of the strangest, most surreal sections of the movie. Pi comes across an island made entirely of algae, and is inhabited by thousands of meerkats. At first he believes this island is a pure hallucination, but when he can feel the algae on his fingertips, he cant help but believe the island is there and real, By day this island is a paradise, but at night the algae turns acidic and deadly, devouring everything that dares swim nearby. He then comes to the awful realization that the island is carnivorous and that is has eaten a human being before him when he found a flower with a human tooth inside. Similarly In RIME the mariner undergoes an experience which changes him forever, The albatross is introduced in the poem, historically albatross were seen by sailors as omens of good luck, and initially the albatross symbolizes this to the sailors when it appears, With the mariner’s killing of the bird the symbol becomes more complicated. As all the symbols build up around the albatross, it also starts to be possible to see the albatross as a symbol of resistance, a symbol of nature in the sense of its complexity, its resistance to being easily analyzed or pinned down. The poem insists that nature is something to be revered just as God is revered. Nature is beyond both the mastery and comprehension of mankind.

Similarly, inner journeys are evident in Lee’s film, ‘Life of Pi’ as Pi too faces a spiritual journey through a physical experience. , the camera shot of the ship sinking symbolises a new beginning for PI, and the sadness of the situation is set by the music and dark lighting. This can be seen as the waves are roaring and moving Pi’s lifeboat crazily along the water. The camera shots used in this scene are used to convey the dramatic effect. The ship sinking can be compared to god withdrawing, leaving pi alone to become an independent person, with a strong faith. Pi is exiled from having his loved ones and experiences with his religion as god allows him to undergo such suffering and pain. But this scene implies that such experiences are necessary to grow in faith and independence. This can also be seen in RIME, The poem presents nature as more powerful, inspiring and terrifying than man can comprehend, And further, the poem depicts any attempt to master nature as pointless, Nature is simply too powerful, as is evident when the sudden lack of wind strands the ship in desolate waters, the Mariner and sailors begin to die of thirst, the poem demonstrates that contending with, merely surviving, or attempting to master nature are the wrong ways for humankind to approach the natural world

Thus, physical journeys can be conveyed in different ways and can impact a said persons life in different ways, changing their perspective on things one way or another.

Life of Pi’ Animal Symbolism: Critical Essay

The primary concern of good literature is the representation of the human experiences of surviving, to successfully engage and provoke their readers to morally question their own values and identity. Yan Martel humanizes his characters through the process of spiritual experiences that are developed throughout his novel in order to establish a bond between the audience and the characters. The power of storytelling is shown in Yann Martel’s 2002 bildungsroman novel “Life of Pi.” which tells the story of a young boy, Pi who faces challenges throughout his journey of survival and is forced to let go of his beliefs and values. My reading was extended by using Freud’s Psychoanalytic theory in an attempt to connect the audience with the characters through a deeper understanding of their character development. Life of Pi depicts how discovery can be sudden or unexpected as Pi is forced by the power of nature to confront the harsh reality of survival. Pi learns to explore his human morality and identity as well as suffering from human experiences including grief, isolation, sacrifice of self, and questioning truth.

Yann Martel’s novel “Life of Pi” successfully conveys human experiences through Pi’s instinctual thought process allowing the reader to empathize with Pi and see the novel from Pi’s perspective. Martel has positioned the reader this way, in an attempt to alter the reader’s mindset and the way they respond to the book. This is shown through, “I was now a killer. I was guilty as Cain” pg 203. Yan Martel utilizes High modality through “guilty now” and Biblical allusion through the referencing of Cain to emphasize the guilt and the shift between ego and superego. This represents how Pi’s catholic faith is contrasted to his current situation as he is now physically “a killer”. Through the shift between ego and superego Pi goes against his morals and kills the fish. Martel uses this scene to make a biblical reference almost admitting that Pi did wrong in the word of his faith and has now killed “like Cain” comparing himself to evil. This gives us an insight into Pi’s thoughts and feelings which is Freud’s theory as a guide to interpret the novel and represent human experiences. Similarly, martel represents the tiger as a form of a god that guides Pi both physically and spiritually throughout his journey. This is shown through ”Richard Parker companion of my torment, awful fierce thing that kept me alive, moved forward and disappeared forever from my life” This juxtaposition verbalizes the motif of Richard Parker which makes the reader question if the tiger was ever really there. This relates back to the motif of Richard Park as a God and as a symbol of hope for Pi, which eventually leads him to safety. Richard Parker can also be seen as the Id in Pi’s animal story when Richard Parker eats the hyena. This story is parallel to his human story when Pi eats the chef, this reflects that Pi is Richard Parker. The two stories represent the thematic concern of religion and how each person has an individual response to it.

Martle illustrates how one must sacrifice them self and let go of beliefs to survive. Shown through “Tears flowing down my cheeks, I egged myself on until I heard a cracking sound and I no longer felt any life-fighting in my hands.” Pg: 183. Martel utilizes emotive language through “tears” and metaphoric statements through “no longer felt any life-fighting in my hands”. To do what? … as represents Pi going against his religion and beliefs of being vegetarian. This showcases Pi making a department from his faiths/beliefs and values in order to survive. With Pi’s need to fulfill his overwhelming hunger, it exemplifies Pi’s inner strength and sacrifice of self and his past religious beliefs. Sentence starter “I egged myself on” with him going against the superego and having to kill then eat the fish. Through this quote, Martle illustrates the human experience of the sacrifice of self and needing to let go of beliefs in order to survive. Martel uses the symbolism of the lifeboat and tiger to represent Pi’s willpower and hope for survival. Literally, the lifeboat is a raft Pi uses for survival, however, symbolically the raft is represented as a safe haven as well as showing Pi’s journey as he grows as a person in both strength and intelligence. In contrast to Pi disregarding his religion, Pi’s religious beliefs, and his willpower significantly contribute to his survival. This is shown as he prays on the lifeboat, “ Now I will turn miracle into routine. The amazing will be seen every day. I will put in all the hard work necessary. Yes, so long as God is with me, I will not die. Amen.” Pi keeps in touch with his religious beliefs and praying to god in order to stay alive. When the reality of having to share a lifeboat with Richard Parker hits Pi, he feels terrified and hopeless. As Pi considers giving up he hears a voice which is suggested as a god telling him to fight and survive. Martel demonstrates human experiences through the act of praying and relying on a god to protect and watch over them, which many readers can relate to.

Life of Pi’ Religion and Zoology Essay

Multiple perspectives create a story. The reader’s ordinary and cognitive perspectives contribute meaning to the text. The thematic panorama shows how the writing itself is a nexus of meaning. The authorial perspective moves beyond the scope of the text, and the reader to show how the text belongs to a larger network of stories that have shaped the author’s literary values.

These values explain what the author was trying to accomplish through his text and in what ways he was trying to challenge the reader’s perspective. All four of these complete perspectives are themselves incomplete perspectives on truth. The truth is not flat. It is dynamic, like a sculpture that can be viewed from different angles. To understand the sculpture more completely, you need to walk around it and see it from multiple perspectives.

The ordinary, cognitive, thematic, and authorial perspectives each look at this statue from a different angle. These angles are in dialogue with one another, speaking from opposite sides of the statue. Yann Martel’s Life of Pi is a story about growing up featuring a youngster’s Pi’s endurance for a considerable length of time in the Pacific Ocean on a raft with a grown-up Bengal tiger named Richard Parker.

Pi grows up around creatures in his family’s zoo in India. After the family chooses to move to Canada and sell the zoo creatures, the boat on which they are making the excursion meets with a fiasco and sinks. The ordinary perspective may only be able to see a boy on a lifeboat, but the thematic and authorial perspectives speak from a different angle informing the ordinary that there is a Bengal tiger behind the boy. Let’s say the authorial perspective sees the profile of this large statue that depicts the entire narrative of Pi. This profiled perspective sees both the boy and the tiger in the lifeboat.

It can confirm that both the ordinary and the thematic speak the truth. The authorial perspective may look at the statue a little bit closer and see the inscriptions that the author made on the base of the statue explaining why he sculpted two stories into one lifeboat.

Furthermore, when the authorial speaks to the thematic he will see a more complete connection between the visual text and the inscription. The conversation between the various perspectives continues. Each perspective enriches the conversation of other perspectives. You need to look at the metaphoric statue of Life of Pi from all of these different angles to understand the truths that lie within the text.

The works of Martel while distinguishing between citizenship, nationality, and belonging; emphasize the value of nation and nationality. Martel spent six months in India, visiting temples, mosques, and all the zoos he could find, and a further two years researching animal behavior and the psychology of shipwreck survivors. Creativity and artistic freedom in a writer lead to aesthetic literary values.

“Christianity is a religion in a rush. Look at the world created in seven days. Even on a symbolic level, that’s creation in a frenzy. To one born in a religion where the better for a single soul can be a relay race run over many centuries, with innumerable generations passing along the baton, the quick resolution of Christianity has a dizzying effect. If Hinduism flows placidly like the Ganges, then Christianity bustles like Toronto at rush hour…..Islam followed right behind, hardly a year later. I was fifteen years old and I was exploring my hometown. The Muslim quarter wasn’t far from the zoo. A small, quiet neighborhood with Arabic writing and crescent moons inscribed on the facades of the houses”. (57-58)

Hence artists appear to be imbued with an indefinable power to create out of the mundane experiences of deeper significance echoing a shared verbal imagination in the world of literature. Fact and Fiction are the most significant aspects and subject matter of Martel’s novels, which highlight the eternal qualities of art and its deeper meaning.

Martel is well known for his novel Life of Pi (2001), a fantasy adventure about a boy stranded in a lifeboat with a host of zoo animals, including a zebra, an orangutan, a tiger, and a rat. Martel lived in various locales around the world and brings a global sensibility to his writing. In Martel’s novels first-person narrators, self-reflexive narratives, and symbolic or religious issues are common.

Yann Martel takes an ambitious approach to explore universal concepts and themes of love and loss, grief, pleasure, God in human suffering, and exploration of self. Martel is a writer of philosophical thinking, injecting his ideas about mortality and existence into his characters. He also employs tropes of magical realism, presumably to demonstrate that loss can often make someone feel like they live in an alternate reality, despite the subject matter.

Martel’s power of storytelling demonstrates his belief in the ability of the novel to bear the weight of philosophical, and existential values, the nature of faith, and the importance of religion. Yann Martel’s fiction reflects the difficulties and challenges of theorizing the way in which “national” identity and “nationality” are represented in the Canadian narrative. Martel’s novels display a concern with crossing and transcending traditionally “Fixed” cultural divisions, be they of genre, race, religion, gender, or sexuality.

Martel’s creative writing encompasses many genres: nonfiction and memoir, as well as historical, speculative fiction, self-reflective narratives, meta-fiction, science, and dystopian fiction. Yan Martel’s place in Canadian Literature as well as expostulate on the multilingual and multicultural values that make for an ethical Canada.

Crucial concepts such as Nation as an identity and Transnationalism are what take the discourse beyond colonialism, Diaspora as what broadens such identities, Postmodernism as defies any act of limited definition of identities; Postcolonialism as challenging conventions; Multiculturalism and Globalization as twin transactions that cut across all borders, are discussed in order to prioritize the significance of transnational agendas.

The novel Life of Pi is seen as what challenge and question the boundaries of the nation-state, while moving beyond such limitations to encompass other cultures and backgrounds in the contemporary society of Canada which is influenced by such political and socio-cultural exigencies as the ideologies of Canada a multilingual and multiculturalism “Civil Space”.

Life of Pi deals with themes of displacement and migration; it is a fantasy adventure novel about an Indian boy who explores his spirituality while stranded at sea in a lifeboat with wild animals. Life of Pi explores the impact of stories on religion and allows the reader to ponder over their own beliefs. The novel deals with concepts such as Genre, Hybridity, Identity, and Narrative strategies, in the age of Postmodernism, Post-colonialism, Transnationalism, and Multiculturalism.

The identity crisis is transformed through a struggle for survival in a transitional phase. Notions of identity and location are therefore continually questioned by a postmodern and postcolonial context that foregrounds how cultural identity has become increasingly hybridized. The cultural elements of ethnicity, hybridity, language, and religion are major issues of postcolonial theory.

Pi is a boy who sees God in all things a Hindu by birth, who has become a Muslim and a Christian. Pi’s extensive visits to mosques, churches, and temples, and his reading of the Bible, the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita prepare him to possess an all-accepting, all-absorbing consciousness. Pi the eponymous hero sets off on his journey from India with his family and a collection of animals from his father’s zoo on a voyage to a new life in Canada. Martel describes the personal experiences of migration and dislocation that inspired his Writing. The movement of crossing the Ocean has contributed to the constitution of transnational identities.

“If Hinduism flows placidly like the Ganges, then Christianity bustles like Toronto at rush hour…..Islam followed right behind, hardly a year later. I was fifteen years old and I was exploring my hometown. The Muslim quarter wasn’t far from the zoo. A small, quiet neighborhood with Arabic writing and crescent moons inscribed on the facades of the houses.”(58)

Yann Martel’s novels deal with transcending national identity where multilingual and multicultural differences co-exist. Hence this thesis explores questions of Canadian national identity in the age of Globalization. Martel’s narrative intertwines humor with a humane understanding of his world. In conclusion, Martel juggles with a variety of well-known genres, familiar plots, and other literary conventions.

Martel uses Canada to provide a metaphor for an increasingly globalized world, which conceals the difficulties of surviving in day-to-day life. The novels ultimately are signposts to new aesthetics, new civility, and new world order, the contours of which are as yet developing and cannot be fixed at the present moment.

Transnational literature needs postmodern thinking to promote and stimulate researchers to discover a modern theory of diaspora. There is not a single transnationalism experience, and there is not a transnational theory. With his experimental and sophisticated works, Martel appears to have positioned himself as a transnational literary genius.

Life of Pi’ Morality Essay

When being put to the ultimate challenge of life, it is often questioned whether individuals are meant to remain ethical. In extreme cases of survival, it is typically found that humans will do whatever it takes in order to survive, as an individual’s will to survive is more prominent than their display of morals and beliefs. Yann Martel’s story The Life of Pi follows Piscine Molitor, a young man who is keen on zoology and a firm follower of numerous religions. After deciding to sell their zoo and move to Canada, Pi and his family struggle to sell all of the animals and eventually bring aboard the remaining few onto the boat that they were meant to sail to Canada on. While aboard the ship, a storm arises and strikes the ship leaving the boat in shambles. Pi finds a refugee on a lifeboat as he is left as the only human survivor alongside Richard Parker, a Bengal Tiger. Pi faces an abundance of challenges during this time and the conditions he faces cause him to adopt a personality that disregards modern-day ethics governed by the apex goal of survival. This is shown through Richard Parker, an apparition of Molitor’s animalistic personality, through minor events throughout Life of Pi, and finally, when Pi begins to rebel against his own religions.

It is referenced throughout the book that the animals that Pi mentions in the story are actually humans. For instance, Richard Parker is an aspect of Pi’s own consciousness that represents his animalistic traits. Pi attempts to suppress these behaviors, but eventually, whenever Pi cannot control Richard Parker, he lashes out. To begin with, at the beginning of the story Pi is stuck on the lifeboat with a Hyena, Richard Parker, an Orangutan (nicknamed “Orange-Juice”), and a zebra. All of these animals symbolize humans that Pi was actually stuck on the boat with; the Hyena is the cook, Richard Parker is Pi, orange juice is his mother, and the zebra is the sailor. In The Life of Pi, the hyena ends up killing both the zebra and the orangutan, and when the zebra killed the orangutan, Richard Parker ended up killing the Hyena.“She was beheaded. The neck wound was still bleeding. It was a sight horrible to the eyes and killing to the spirit… I looked down. Between my feet, under the bench, I beheld Richard Parker’s head… His paws were like volumes of Encyclopaedia Britannia” (Martel 146). When switching perspectives to that of the human story, Pi ends up killing the cook to avenge his mother’s death. In addition to killing the cook (the hyena), Richard Parker (Pi), also kills the French man. Pi befriends a man on his journey, and when Pi invites him onto his lifeboat, the man becomes violent and displays cannibalistic intent. Richard Parker ends up protecting Pi and killing the man. “I heard the merest clicking of claws against the bottom of the boat… My dear brother shrieked in my face like I’d never heard a man shriek before. He let go of me. This was the terrible cost of Richard Parker.” (Martel 283). Pi killed the French man in order to protect his own well-being, as he had to take drastic measures in order to survive, and if it wasn’t for the French man, he would have perished instead. Finally, whenever Pi fed and took care of Richard Parker, he simultaneously nurtured his animalistic instincts. “Clearly Richard Parker had eaten his fill of hyena and drunk all the rainwater he wanted” (Martel 180). If taken metaphorically, Pi began to give in to his animalistic side and began to accept its existence as he continued to feed it and nurture the side of himself. This suggests that Pi made peace with this side of himself and allowed it to be free. Overall, Richard Parker is a metaphorical extension of Pi that enables him to commit acts otherwise deemed animalistic by societal standards.

Pi was faced with multiple conflicting decisions throughout the two hundred and twenty-seven days he spent cramped on a lifeboat. For starters, at the beginning of his travels, when the hyena began to devour the zebra, Pi felt no empathy or remorse for the slowly suffering zebra, and instead only felt anger and vengeance as he wanted to cause harm and hurt the hyena. “I felt intense hatred for the hyena. I thought of doing something to kill it… I didn’t have pity to spare for long for the zebra. When your own life is threatened, your sense of empathy is blunted by a terrible, selfish, hunger for survival.” (Martel 133). Moving forward, when Pi is astray on the lifeboat for a few months, he explains to the reader that when put into a life-threatening situation, all senses of reality become distorted and individuals begin to commit rash acts due to the fear of death and desire for survival. “Quickly you make rash decisions. You dismiss your last allies: hope and trust. There, you’ve defeated yourself. Fear, which is but an impression, has triumphed over you” (Martel 179). Pi explains in this passage that the “allies” that he relied on the most, hope and trust, have been dismissed and he no longer has anybody else but himself. He is his own ally. Finally, throughout his journey, Pi kept a series of journals and diaries. By doing so, he explained to the audience that it kept him sane and made him feel normal. This would be considered a coping mechanism for Pi as he comes to the realization of his own unethical acts and uses the diary as a deterrent to this behavior. “I kept a diary. It’s hard to read. I wrote as small as I could. I was afraid I would run out of paper…I talked about what you might expect: about things that happened and how I felt, about what I caught and what I didn’t, about seas and weather, about problems and solutions, about Richard Parker.” (Martel 231)

Pi also displayed unethical behavior throughout the book as he began to rebel against his own morals and his belief system. To begin, when Pi is first stranded on the lifeboat, he vows to never eat meat as Pi has a love for animals and he grew up in a zoo, surrounded by all sorts of creatures. Everybody around him including his family was vegetarian. After a few more days and weeks on the lifeboat, Pi comes to the realization that the only way to survive out in the Pacific is to make sacrifices; in this case, abandoning his vegetarian lifestyle. “Tears flowing down my cheeks, I egged myself on until I heard a cracking sound and I no longer felt any life-fighting in my hands. I pulled back the folds of the blanket. The flying fish was dead.” (Martel 203). This passage shows the obvious conflict between Pi wanting to stay true to himself and not harm any creature but at the end of it all, he ends up committing the unethical act of killing the flying fish in order for him to survive. In addition to this, Pi started off as a timid killer, Pi gagged at the mere thought of hurting a creature but as he became comfortable with catching prey in order to fend for himself, he began to do so with no remorse. “You may be astonished that in such a short period of time, I could go from weeping over the muffled killing of a flying fish to a gleefully bludgeoning to death of a dorado” (Martel 205). The passage shows that Pi is truly delighted that he is able to catch the prey and is disregarding the life of the creature that has just passed in his hands. Finally, further into the book, Pi descends into a state of madness and he befriends a Frenchman. At first, the Frenchman is kind and Pi and the man develop a brotherly bond. Once Pi invites the man onto his boat, the man becomes cannibalistic and murderous and Richard Parker ends up killing him. Whilst dead, Pi consumes some of the man’s flesh as a desperate last resort, for no more fish remain for Pi to eat. “I will further confess that driven by the extremity of my need and the madness to which it pushed me, I ate some of his flesh… You must understand, my suffering was unremitting and he was already dead.” (Martel 284). The situation in which Pi was placed was so extreme that he was willing to consume another human being for his own survival. Overall, during the first span of time that Pi was on the lifeboat, Pi was extremely frightened of rebelling and not being true to himself, as time went by, Pi slowly began to descend into a state of madness and disregarded his morals and beliefs in order to survive.

Pi rebelled against modern ethics during his excursion in the Pacific Ocean. He did so by adopting an animalistic personality which was embodied by Richard Parker, by certain minor acts that he committed throughout the story, as well as abandoning his religious beliefs. This connects to the world we live in today as there have been many cases of individuals who have been cast away and began to descend into a state of madness that would make them act unethically. For instance, the case of Leendert Hasenbosch occurred in 1725. Hasenbosch kept a diary, had a tent, and a month’s worth of water. Similarly to Pi, Hasenbosch eventually ran out of his food supply and water. Hasenbosch drank the blood of turtles and drank his own urine because his will to survive disregarded what is considered ethical in the modern day. Hasenbosch’s case is similar to Pi’s as Pi was stranded with nothing but a lifeboat and some supplies left on the boat. Pi was left to fend for himself as his survival was much more important to rather than abiding by the law. This also correlates to the fact that humans as a species are selfish beings. As demonstrated in Life of Pi, Pi disregarded the life around him and was willing to kill and disrupt whatever it took in order for him to survive. All in all, Pi’s behavior in Life of Pi disregarded modern ethics as his need to survive outweighed his individual morals and beliefs.

Life of Pi’ Essay: I Just Want to Love God

A ubiquitous theme in literature is religion. The Bible is a very popular book, and the first-ever printed, and has many stories of faith. In Life of Pi, Pi is a boy who is Indian and is learning about different types of religion and faith. After the ship sank on the way to Canada, Pi got lost at sea. In the middle of the Pacific Ocean, Pi was on a lifeboat with a tiger who was called Richard Parker. By faith he used was shown on his face. Pi’s survival was put into a story to show perseverance and the faith he showed. In Life of Pi, Yann Martel used different religious meanings to show the circumstances of the story’s overall meaning of the allegory. In the novel, the life of the religion is symbolized by the ocean and the island throughout Pi’s experience.

The author, Yann Martel, used Pi’s faith as a story to reveal a hidden meaning. An allegorical meaning behind a part of the novel, Life of Pi is how he learned how to survive using different instincts. For example, “When your own life is threatened, your sense of empathy is blunted by a terrible, selfish hunger for survival.” Pi discovers that the hyenas are viciously attacking the zebras, but he doesn’t care that much due to the priority of his own survival. Second, “Survival had to start with me. In my experience, a castaway’s worst mistake is to hope too much and do too little.” Pi also discovers that when Richard Parker comes onto the lifeboat, he comes up with a new plan for survival until he is saved by others. Lastly, “There was a tiger in the lifeboat. I could hardly believe it, yet I knew I had to. And I had to save myself.” Pi decided to build useful equipment by using the material he found, like the life jackets and ropes from the locker. To keep a little distance between Pi and Richard Parker, the tiger, the raft is floating away. To summarize, Pi blocked out the distraction, the animals, to focus on himself and his own survival. Pi practiced the different religions and never gave up his faith. By always having faith it showed the strength he had and the thrive to survive. Pi survives in his struggle. When people think more rationally, they tend to be in a life-or-death situation.

As a child, growing up and gets stranded. He forms a relationship with animals and looks back on everything. This is proven in the novel, Life of Pi, when Pi states, “He was too far. But the sight of the lifebuoy flying his way gave him hope. He revived and started beating the water with vigorous, desperate strokes.” Pi spots Richard Parker in the bright blue ocean water and throws him a tube-like, lifebuoy to save him from drowning. Pi states what he believes Richard Parker is going through in his mind thus he is a tiger. Pi also states, “Richard Parker had been a zoo animal for as long as he could remember, and he was used to sustenance coming to him without his lifting a paw.” Pi’s success in taming Richard Parker is immaculate that the two can have some type of communication on the lifeboat, as it is explained that he is no longer a wild animal. In the real world, Richard Parker would normally hut, but since he was in the zoo for most of his life, food and water were provided for him. Lastly Pi states, “But I don’t want to take too much credit for what I managed to do with Richard Parker. My good fortune, the fortune that saved my life, was that he was not only a young adult but a pliable young adult, an omega animal.” Pi continues to show who is alpha to Richard Parker, by training him to jump through hoops and showing the success, progress, and most of all the trust, and bond they have with each other. To sum this up, the training puts together a strong bond that can’t be broken. This represents the human encounter due to the qualities of the lifeboat.

In the novel, Life of Pi, everything is connected in some type of way and has a message that is valued. For example, when Pi states, “The world isn’t just the way it is. It is how we understand it, no? And in understanding something, we bring something to it, no? Doesn’t that make life a story?” When Pi was in the hospital, the other humans wanted to hear about how and why the ship had sunk. Given their responses, they didn’t believe Pi’s story with Richard Parker. Another example is, “So tell me since it makes no factual difference to you and you can’t prove the question either way, which story do you prefer?” Pi told two different tales to the Japanese people. His question relates to if he believes what they would think about the stories. “Which is the better story, the story with animals or the story without animals?’ Mr. Okamoto: ‘That’s an interesting question?’ Mr. Chiba: ‘The story with animals.’ Mr. Okamoto: ‘Yes. The story with animals is the better story.’ Pi Patel: ‘Thank you. And so it goes with God.” Pi expands the truth of the themes concerning the stories, and the story pursues God in his life. If there is no proven way to show that God is by your side and that God is real, How do you know if he is there? How do we know if he is with us? This actively demonstrates that Pi kept moving forward with life by not giving up hope. Throughout the story, he always pulled through and had hope. Pi never gave up hope of survival.

To sum up, everything that has been stated, in Life of Pi, religious allegory is used to deepen the meaning of the text. This allegory showed that Pi got too comfortable with being alone and stranded. Nobody believes his story when he makes it back to land safely. One thing that Pi did believe in was taking a leap of faith. Having faith is starting by believing in the story of Pi and Richard Parker. The better story included the animals which Chiba and Okamoto believed in. In both versions of the stories, they all stated that Pi’s family had died, Pi had survived being stranded, and the ship sinks

Literary Analysis Essay on ‘Life of Pi’

Pi’s multiculturalism and abstract mindset have been seen through his numerous beliefs and solid qualities likewise mirror that of post pioneers. Generally speaking, Life of Pi from numerous points of view shows a solid association and joins the idea of postmodernism into the novel in different manners. I totally agree that Life of Pi relates to post-modernism and even more in order that Yann Martel purposely creates paradoxes to form you define the word ‘truth” with regard to the book and in your own life and values, as well.

On one hand, Pi describes this luscious island called at the center of the Pacific in such an abstract way, but consistent with the Japanese man, this island doesn’t exist. Does it exist or not exist? It’s up to you. As Pi said, his memories are available in a jumble but although they’re all involved, I feel for the foremost part, Pi actually does realize the truth story. Whether or not the primary or the second was the reality, I suppose we’ll never know, but it all relates to the concept of uncertainty and therefore the look for truth as you said. Great connection to post-modernism.

Rearranging to the extraordinary, I characterize postmodernism as skepticism toward meta-stories’. A meta-story is any hypothesis or thought that endeavors to clarify the entirety of history and society. Science, Religion, and Philosophy give meta-stories. At the end of the day, it is distrust towards any hypothesis, thought, or truth guarantee that tries to clarify the entirety of history and our individual lives.

In the majority of Story Lines No creatures, more significantly, No coasting Islands, and no Bengal tiger gets by with him. Murder, Cannibalism, More critically, can likewise be found in a person who acknowledges different religions, ways of thinking, or realities generally for emotional reasons.

Pi goes through a significant religious awakening in his life, eventually following a variety of religions: Hinduism, Catholicism, and finally Islam. Although the religious leaders don’t accept Pi’s plural religions, his family gradually does, and he remains a devout follower of all his religious paths for his entire life. This pluralistic part of Pi’s confidence is postmodern in light of the fact that he doesn’t consider just these religions as evident but every one of them as obvious.

Postmodernism is found in the Life of Pi in two significant manners: Thus the postmodern belief system of Life of Pi targets showing the estimation of a strict perspective over an agnostic one even considering the way that a strict perspective may be nonsensical or unreasonable. We favor an all the more energizing and positive story and along these lines, as Pi says, ‘So it goes with God’. Pi comes to have faith in Hinduism, Christianity, and Islam. This is pluralism explicitly that of confidence or religion.

In Martel’s writing, Life of Pi, the controlling forces of society play major roles both before and after Pi’s voyage. The expectations that his family has for him are often different than the expectations that he has for himself. His parents clearly express their confusion about his choice to pursue religious pluralism. When Pi asks his parents to be baptized and for a prayer rug, his mother responds,

“Listen, my darling, if you’re going to be religious, you must be either a Hindu a Christian, or a Muslim” (73).

Post-modernism may not be a depiction of a study, however, it is the portrayal of something, and the issue with this is the emotional considerations that we as a whole produce. It might have a marginally unique significance for certain individuals. With these sorts of free depictions, with words by any stretch of the imagination, the book Life of Pi, by Yann Martel, has been one of the most discussed books of this time. Genuinely, it is an intriguing book since it manages several of the highlights that define post-modernism.

The novel imitates actuality, even though the actuality is moderately ultimate. Reading along, the reader understands it might be more of an adventurous book since it has a built-up thrill. From here on, religion and faith begin. One of the last sentences of the Life of Pi reads:

“An amazing story of courage and perseverance in the light of extraordinarily difficult and tragic circumstances.”

How can an individual assemble the power and endurance in such a defenseless state with a Bengal tiger, without food and a friendly environment on a lifeboat?” Possibly with a spirit of hope. The Pacific Ocean is a metaphor for God. The ocean is vast and expansive and, as Pi experienced, an ocean full of water can be all around you, and yet one can suffer from thirst.

The mystery is that one of Pi’s narratives is the truth, which is built up as a way to cope with the harsh reality. Life of Pi allots with specific very common post-modernistic concept meta-fiction and moves further ideas. Even though today goes on next to the post-modernist period, certain assumptions that are challenging the human spirit and its functions will naturally always reach our attention. Post-modernism might be a “loose” word in its context, but that might also be the reason for millions of people discovering Life of Pi to be an extraordinary book.

Martel gives his views about the belief in God, the Primacy of Survival, freedom, truth and relativity of science and religion, and mankind in an extraordinary way of self-image throughout his creativity. The way of using cliché and the style of narration and postmodernism is the secret behind the success of this novel. This is why the readers love this novel which gives them knowledge with a fanatical adventure while reading.

‘Animals in the wild lead lives of compulsion and necessity within an unforgiving social hierarchy in an environment where the supply of fear is high and the supply of food low and where territory must constantly be defended and parasites forever endured. What is the meaning of freedom in such a context? Animals in the wild are, in practice, free neither in space nor in time, nor in their personal relations.'(16)

Certainty shifts when Pi meets a Japanese insurance agency seeking clarification as to how he survived and how the Tsistsum sinks. But Pi tells them a different story; they moved to the same destination but became tangled in the cannibalistic and miserable journey. Without further analysis, all metaphor concludes at this point. It is up to the reader to choose which tale is real and which is fiction.

“So tell me, since it makes no factual difference to you and you can’t prove the question either way, which story do you prefer? Which is the better story, the story with animals or the story without animals?’ Mr. Okamoto: ‘That’s an interesting question?’ Mr. Chiba: ‘The story with animals.’ Mr. Okamoto: ‘Yes. The story with animals is the better story.’ Pi Patel: ‘Thank you. And so it goes with God.” (317)

“This passage contains several of the important themes and motifs of the novel. The final question, posed to the author, calls attention both to the fact that this story is being told through an intermediary, and to the arbitrariness of the telling book does indeed have a hundred chapters, and it would seem that the reason was a simple challenge from Pi. Similarly, Pi’s injunction that ‘we must give things a meaningful shape’ connects two of the novel’s prominent themes, storytelling and belief in God. He believes that the act of storytelling, of giving things shape, can apply in life too, and thus one can shape one’s own story in the most beautiful way by believing in God.”

Here, Yann Martel himself denoted “the better story” as the keyword that enlarges the theme of truth and reality. Also, God simply exists throughout the keyword which explains the truth only exists by representing the god shake. But the word “story” mentioned remains it’s the fictional story that emerges with the author’s narration. The belief in God and the religious views about mankind also represented the mirage of Indian people. Also, he realized the importance of storytelling and often reminded that to the readers.

Life of Pi’ Argumentative Essay

Yann Martel’s bildungsroman novel Life of Pi confronts and explores the contrasting and conflicting nature of both faith and science and their coexistence in this universe. Martel’s unconventional approach makes the novel appear to a broad audience as, like Pi, we all know what it is like to suffer. The suffering of Pi is essential to his survival out in the Pacific Ocean as it shows the reader how faith and science are significant in living a life that is full of trials and tribulations. The confronting revelation that Martel presents close to the conclusion of the novel allows the reader to choose which version of Pi’s story they would rather see — which is symbolic of the perspectives of faith and science. Thus Pi, choosing to retell his suffering through the lens of faith, is implying that living life through the perspective of faith is more inspiring and motivating compared to the lens of reason. However, in Pi’s story of survival, he needs both faith and science which motivate and support his purpose to live. Through this understanding of perspectives, Martel may be encouraging the reader to ultimately care and love for one another. Hence, through the suspension of disbelief, the structure of the novel, and symbolism, Martel demonstrates how the two perspectives of life that seem opposing collaborate in the face of adversity to help Pi endure and persist through times of suffering.

Martel achieves a fine and delicate balance between faith and science in Life of Pi but the suffering of Pi is what allows the reader to see why many people are attracted to faith. Faith in Pi’s life was what helped him persevere and endure through suffering and loss, it kept him motivated and fed his spirit to “never give up” (148). Without faith, Pi would have surrendered his life amidst all the suffering as he could not find a purpose to go on living. It already seemed impossible to survive after losing everything he once knew and now to share a lifeboat with a hungry adult Bengal tiger, a zebra, a hyena and an orangutan out in the Pacific Ocean gave absolutely no reassurance that he could ever reach rescue before being devoured by hungry animals. However, through this suspension of disbelief, faith gives hope to the impossible and shines light even on the darkest holes, “Faith in God is an opening up, a letting go, a deep trust” (208) that if one falls, they trust that there will be something there that will protect them, but sometimes, it seems that nothing is there and one simply has to get back up. At these times, it feels as though one has been misled and abandoned however this is part of God’s test, and Pi’s suffering is testing his strength of faith. “It is trusting beyond all reason and evidence that you have not been abandoned” (Martin, HuffPost) and continue to trust in God which is why Pi acknowledges that “sometimes it was so hard to love” (208). Thus, through the role of faith in Pi’s suffering, the reader can understand why Pi was so intrigued with the notion of faith and how faith saved him from death.

As Martel’s revelation of the two perspectives concludes, the reader is able to also see how the role of faith serves in Pi’s survival but more importantly, Martel also demonstrates the role of science and how it contributed to saving Pi’s life in the Pacific Ocean. These seemingly opposing perspectives somehow collaborated in Pi’s survival which first of all, demonstrates Martel’s incredible writing ability but secondly, broadens the reader’s perspective on how and why many people trust the perspective of science thus reason. In Pi’s survival, “Reason is excellent for getting food, clothing and shelter” (98) so that he could sustain his mortal needs. Thus in this sense, without reason from science, Pi would not have survived. Reason provides knowledge and helps our senses navigate this world thus we learn how to survive. One cannot survive simply on the basis of faith and visa versa as “Be excessively reasonable and you risk throwing out the universe with the bathwater” (298). Therefore, Pi’s survival gives a reason why we cannot sustain our mortal needs in this world if we choose to neglect science and live only on the basis of faith hence Jordan perceives the relationship between faith and science as a “fine, delicate balance” as Martel demonstrates how the two seemingly opposing perspectives coexist in the human world of trials and tribulations.

Interestingly, as Jordan perceives this novel to display the parity of faith and science, Martel spends 94 chapters of Pi retelling his suffering through the perspective of faith which may in fact, imply an underlying message suggesting otherwise: live life through the miracles of faith. Reason helps us navigate the world with our senses but faith helps us explore the wider possibilities that “our limited senses” (48) cannot fathom. Thus, the notion of trusting something that our senses cannot depict is fearsome for many: it is why many are adamant about reason as it satisfies everything that their senses can depict. Having faith in something that our human senses cannot depict is even more fearful which is why many do not believe in faith as reason has already provided all the answers to their questions. But as Pi explores his belief in science, when “Everything I value in life has been destroyed. And I am allowed no explanation? I am to suffer hell without any account from heaven? In that case what is the purpose of reason?” (98) When reason fails, who else can answer life’s questions? If God does not help, then is this the limit of reason? When one does not have faith, “then fear, disguised in the garb of mild-mannered doubt, slips into your mind like a spy” (161). Perhaps Pi’s story of survival is a testament to the importance of faith in our lives. Perhaps this is what Martel is conveying to the readers. “A God” that Pi explores is “too human a scale” and shows “The finite within the infinite, the infinite within the finite” (49). Evidently, faith is a rather confusing concept for the reader to understand which may also be another reason for Martel’s approach to the structure of the story; cleverly symbolized through the characterization of Pi’s name, an irrational and infinite number. Thus if we lived life on the foundation of facts and reason, we may in the end, lose our sense of purpose and imagination through the “dry, yeastless factuality” (64) of reason’s perspective and ultimately “miss the better story” (64).

However Martel intends to convey the novel to the reader, he has created an incredibly marvelous novel about the coexistence of faith and science in this universe. Both perspectives provide answers in this world thus it is unreasonable to neglect one and choose the other. They provide two different perspectives that Martel demonstrates to save Pi. This balance or approach that Martel achieves creates a sense of equity to show the marvelous things that these perspectives provide. To understand more perspectives enhances our nature to be better human beings. Understanding different perspectives makes us as human beings more unified especially in today’s global community where many political, social, economic, and environmental issues seem to disconnect our sense to ultimately care and love another. Perhaps Martel is implying in our times of suffering, seek to understand others, seek to understand and explore both perspectives of faith and science as that was how Pi survived what seemed to be impossible. Maybe, Martel is encouraging the reader to even have an element of faith in their life, to be able to see another perspective. It once seemed impossible that these two perspectives would even have the slightest correlation to one another but cleverly does so through the suspension of disbelief, the structure of the novel, and symbolism, Martel shows the importance of each of these perspectives in a person’s life. Life of Pi is truly a marveling piece of writing that evidently transcends time and place and deservingly earns its spot as one of the greatest works of English Literature.

Works Cited

    1. Comaniuk, Sherry Lynne. Life of Pi: Can a Story Make You Believe in God? Wix.com, 18
    2. March. 2016, sheakes19.wixsite.com/scomaniuk/single-post/2016/03/17/Life-of-Pi-Can-a-Story-Make-You-Believe-in-God
    3. Jordan, Justine. Review of Life of Pi, by Yann Martel. The Guardian, 25 May 2002, www.theguardian.com/books/2002/may/25/fiction.reviews1
    4. “Life of Pi Quotes.” Life of Pi Quotes: Faith, SparkNotes www.sparknotes.com/lit/lifeofpi/quotes/theme/faith/. Accessed 7 Oct. 2019.
    5. Martel, Yann. Life of Pi. Canongate, 2012.
    6. Martin, Rea Nolan. Faith and Belief Are Not the Same. HuffPost, 28 Oct. 2013, www.huffpost.com/entry/faith-and-belief_b_4166117