Category: Legacy

Every single one of us wants to be remembered in one way or another. We want to be remembered for more than just being normal and ordinary. Many people believe that their legacy is reflected by the wealth that they have accumulated and the degrees and diplomas they have achieved throughout their lifetime, I believe that one’s legacy isn’t merely based on their bank statement but rather on the positive impact that they have made on those around them. This left me wondering, what is my legacy?

One person in particular that I admire and look up to is Lee Kuan Yew. I first heard about LKY when traveling to Singapore a few years ago, the locals told me about the countless things he had done to improve their life for the better. LKY is a man regarded by many as the founding father of Singapore, he became Singapore’s first prime minister and continued to govern for three decades transforming Singapore from a 3rd world country into a global economic powerhouse. LKY is a huge inspiration to me due to the fact that he managed to completely transform the lives of people living in Singapore. Hearing so many positive things about him from Singaporean locals has led me to want to leave a positive impact on those around me and to be remembered for the positive changes which I plan on making in my lifetime.

I believe that in today’s society people struggle with meeting the “ideal” standards which the internet portrays as normal. The current suicide rate is higher than ever before and I feel that a lot of people are being neglected by those around them. This is an issue that I believe needs to be dealt with and I plan on doing the most I can to put an end to this problem faced by so many people worldwide. I want to be remembered for always accepting, understanding, and being friendly with people regardless of their appearance, beliefs, and racial status and hopefully, my actions will inspire others to follow in my footsteps of being understanding, transparent, and always positive regardless of the situation which they are placed in.

I strive to be remembered for always standing out. Although I might not be the top academic achiever or the best on the sports field I want people to know that they must always give it their all and do the best that they can. I don’t compare myself to others but rather work on improving and becoming the best possible version of myself because at the end of the day there will always be someone “better”, someone with more money, someone in better shape, and someone with more fame. Trying to be better than those around you will only bring you down, working on yourself is far more valuable and important. I hope that people can take me as an example and follow in my footsteps of focusing on themselves rather than trying to be better than those around them.

The more I live and experience the more I come to realize that my legacy is something that is forever changing. I cannot predict how people will see me 50 years from now but what I do know is that I can do my best to spread positivity, hopefulness, and joy on a day-to-day basis so that hopefully one-day people can look back on me and remember me as an outgoing, different, positive and self bettering individual who can inspire people to follow in my footsteps and change for the better.

There is a diversity of many different cultures all around the world. My roots are from Europe West countries such as Belgium, France, Germany, and Switzerland, as well as Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. My background of my culture is linked to the Vikings. The Vikings have been explorers and raiders of different countries during the Middle Ages. The Vikings’ attribution of the culture in the past of religion, values, art, and gender roles can contribute to our perception in today’s society.

The term ‘Viking’ was used to describe individuals that come from Scandinavia, which was changed between the eighth and eleventh century to be known as Denmark, Norway, and Sweden (Wiles, 2016). The Vikings raided regions in Europe by traveling by sea and raided on land. They developed trade routes and settled in Ireland and Britain. The foundation of the term ‘Viking’ is unknown. It is believed that the term is derived from a language called the Old Nora that was commonly used with the people of Scandinavia. It was believed the language of Old Nora had the word ‘vik’, which meant to inhabit the land and sea (Wiles, 2016). The Vikings were always moving from one country to another never staying in one country for long. They were fierce warriors.

The Vikings’ representation of in the United States is seen as superiority towards other cultures. White supremacy is seen in society with white men being the controllers of power. There has been tension with presidential elections of white officials running for president, and only one president was of a different race. The current president possibly has relatives from Iceland, which can make him related with the Vikings (Iceland Magazine, 2016). The president’s motives and actions he takes are very ambitious and very control oriented. This can be related with the Vikings with their need for control and power of invading different countries and ambition to explore. The United States is run by mostly white Americans which throws other races feeling lower than white individuals. It was a unique event when Barack Obama, who is an African American, ran for president. He helped chain the events in the presidential election from always having a president that is a white male leader to see another race rule power. Another aspect in presidential elections is seen as all male leader run for president, and we still haven’t had a woman president. Men have been the dominating group seen even in the Viking group, and women never had any say in political group decisions. Women through history gained the freedom to vote, but we’ve never had a women run for president until recent years. Hillary Clinton ran for president being the first woman to run for president. Even when she didn’t win, this sparked freedom for women to run for a leadership role in an all-male dominating political field, which has been seen in Viking culture as well.

The Vikings worked as a group to raid and trade and sell for the tribe, but when it came to it, the motivation for their actions was for their own selfish pride and dignity. Honor of the Vikings is displayed with their social relationship of their family, friends, and fellow warriors. Honor was also displayed with any actions of heroic events or successes by a Viking. These achievements are further remembered and the Viking men’s name is remembered in honor and celebrated with their death. There main motivation for Viking men to go on voyages to fight is for wealth and power.

The Vikings were very into musical instruments and the sounds they made. They used instruments that made rattle type of noises, such as using pig jawbones and circle bronze pieces (Harwell-Sturgill, 2016). Norse drums were also made with clay pottery and wrapped with animal skin. The Vikings were always traveling to vast lands and experiencing different sets of art and music. The materials they mainly used was ivory, bone, wood, metal, and stone. Many Viking artists used a methods of wood carving to do very unique and exquisite designs. It was easy to carve while traveling to different countries. Jewelry was also made with gold, silver, bronze and gilded bronze, which was made no only for women but for men as well.

Even though the Vikings were known of being malicious and barbarians to perception of others countries but followed values and beliefs of the Viking group. Loyalty and honor are main follows that the Vikings follow by when they are conquering and raiding other countries, and they need and understanding that when it comes to war that each warrior will be fighting and have each other back if something happens. Justice is a value in war when one warrior is killed then the tribe will seek vengeance. Viking tribes are like family and if one is does something that is not right then this affects the families and friends of the member. This is why honor and reputation is very important to the Vikings. The Vikings believe that courage is the greatest strength when it comes to war and daily life. It is despised when a Viking is cowardly because it is shown as weakness (Neilsen, 2017).

The Vikings believed in many gods, but in the thirteenth century they believed in the pagan belief. This religious practice was developed in Iceland and had sacrifices of horses to the gods. There are many tales that talk about the pagan gods. The main evidence of the literacy is the Eddas. It talks about the gods and their encounters with creatures such as men, dwarfs, and giants (Williams, 2011). The god that is most powerful and is represented in movies was Thor, who is the god of thunder. He is portrayed in the Eddas and the movie as a stupid but strong god. He was the god that would fight off giants with his mighty hammer that was crafted by dwarfs (Williams, 2011). Thor was worshipped by many Vikings. Another character that is well-known is Loki, which is half demon and half god. Many other gods were told in the folktales such as “The one-eyed Odin, the All-Father, god of warfare, justice, death, wisdom and poetry” (Williams, 2011). Their main religions and beliefs were based off pagan beliefs, but when they when off to raid more regions, it expanded their views on other religions such as Christianity. Some Vikings started to convert to the Christianity religion. It was also as if it was pressured to convert to have a peaceful association with Christians. As well, the Vikings settled in Christian neighborhoods in Britain, that made it even more imperative to convert to Christianity. There were having relations with natives and even marriage, which brought up children that partially or fully believed the Christian belief (Williams, 2011). With the influence of the churches and increase in intermarriage led to the Vikings being completely converted to the Christian belief.

Viking men were seen in the voyages to raid other countries, as well in play tribute in the trading and selling. Men were in charge of labor work such as hunting, trading, fishing, fighting and farming. A women’s role in the Viking Age was to take care of the home, take care of the children, and cook for when the men come home. Men were the main population and were the ones to overrule with political and society decisions. If a women tried to overrule their leadership or try to have a say in political matter, they would be decreasing or deteriorating the Viking men’s power. That is why Viking men gave women the position of never being in any political matters or make decisions in society by having women run the home and take care of children. Women in the Viking Age were content with just having a say on how to run the home, but other women tried to fight this restriction of their voice in society. Women that are don’t want to follow the role of being the feminine women to take care of the home and want to be independent and fight were called ‘Valkyries’, who were female warriors. They would fight to for independence and freedom. They would fight if someone tried to terrorize them, their families, or homes. Another difference that is seen between men and women is when it comes to their burials. Viking men are buried with farming tools or weapons, while women are buried with jewelry and items of their home (Pruitt, 2016).

Today’s society should be respectful to the past Viking Age and their culture. Many views in today’s media don’t fully talk about the Viking culture, when they have a movie that is represented in the Middle Ages and the actors being perceived as the Vikings. When individuals dress up in Viking costumes, they should be aware of what is a Viking and the past culture of the Vikings.

The Vikings were seen as being barbaric and cruel individuals that raided, fight, and trade with other countries. The Vikings’ attribution of the culture in the past of religion, values, art, and gender roles can contribute to our perception in today’s society. They believe honor and loyalty are main values to attribute to their family-oriented members of the tribe. We see some attributes of Viking culture in the United States, such as in the presidential elections and even with our current president. Gender roles are even the same with men always being the ones that are more involved with political and labor work, while women are seen to have to take care of the kids and the home. As we digged into the Viking culture, we can see we are actually not that different from them with some aspects. The United States is raised on power and freedom and a nation that is powerful in forces.

It is said that we learn history to appreciate a variety of cultures, but most importantly to have knowledge about the past and not repeat it. Social movements have had a very significant role in history, as they help society develop a greater understanding of issues in politics that are unfair to all. Through the decades, America has seen an enormous amount of inequality, from the moment Rosa Parks decided to hold ground on the bus until recent times when police brutality and racial profiling remain above the charts in favor of some of President Donald Trump’s perspectives. Despite the great advances African Americans have been able to achieve, racism is still alive today.

One of the most successful ways civilians know how to let their voices be heard is through social movements. Social movements are formed to challenge or defend prevailing ways of authority that obstruct inequality, unfairness, and unjust policies. A mass of people band together to form a group to pass their message across multiple obstacles that come their way, the main one being authority. Social movements reappear throughout history as people feel they are needed. A very important concept to understand within social movements is that most people are outsiders who do not have the ability to be heard unless it’s through these movements. This is because the people in these groups are ordinary, average civilians, without political influence on their side. Movements are incredibly important in our society, although we are a democratic country, many times decisions being made by the government do not favor equality for all. Thus, it is essential that people speak up for change, many times they bring awareness or visibility to huge issues and are able to gather social change. Some of the tactics used by these groups are loud and disruptive, while others are peaceful and nonviolent.

One victorious strategy that has been used throughout history is civil disobedience. Which simply means going against the law knowing there will be consequences in hopes of making a difference for equality. A great example of civil disobedience would be Rosa Parks, she refused to sit in the back of the bus assigned to African Americans through racial segregation. She felt it was unfair, and decided to break the law, by refusing, which led to a domino effect. Rosa Parks influenced and encouraged others to join her in a rebellious action that led to an outbreak of many other African Americans speaking out. Rosa Parks’s valiance sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott which led to boycotts nationwide, ultimately adding to the rise of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the greatest advocates for civil rights. Civil rights are the rights of all citizens toward political, and social freedom and equality. After the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, African Americans were supposed to be protected under the law of unjust treatment from others. The 14th Amendment granted their citizenship, making them rightful to their civil rights, and the 15th Amendment emphasized their right to political equality. However, this was not the case.

As African American people tried to protest against unequal treatment they were taken from their freedom of assembly, by being brutally beaten and silenced. In the Selma to Montgomery marches hundreds of lives were taken, simply for expressing their want for the right to vote. Although previously granted the right to vote, African Americans were discriminated against through literacy tests, grandfather clauses, white primaries, and poll taxes. A huge violation of their civil rights, all these devices supported the Jim Crow laws which implemented racial segregation. Five months after the marches, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which was a huge accomplishment for the African-American Civil Rights Movement. In this act, the government banned racial discrimination in voting across the United States, mainly in the South. Johnson also passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination based on race, ethnicity, and sex, another extreme victory for this movement. Not only was this important then but it is now, this goes to show that in order for real change to happen one must have Congress by their side, laws need to be implemented or else nothing will evolve.

At this point in time most segregated areas had become inclusive of all races. Yet, traditional schools were left behind. The South feared that their children would socialize with black children and soon create interpersonal relationships that could potentially lead to marriage. It was not until the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education that, constitutionally speaking, the era of Jim Crow had finally ended. In the Supreme Court case decision of 1954, the judges ruled in favor of Brown naming “separate but equal” unconstitutional. Ultimately this led to all public schools giving African American children the same educational opportunities as white children. This was revolutionary for the African American Civil Rights Movement as it desegregated African Americans from these exclusive schools.

Even though African Americans have persevered through the harsh struggles they have been put against, still today we see discrimination and racism. Unfortunately, in today’s world racism thrives through big corporations such as Walmart and even Southern California Edison, as stated by ThoughtCo. Southern California Edison was sued in 2010 for racism after many African American workers were denied promotions, unfair pay, and biased job assignments. Walmart was sued in 2008 for racial discrimination as they turned away a disproportionate amount of African-American truck drivers. Racism also still exists in the fashion industry, for example, the fast-fashion company H&M exposed an image in January 2018 of an African American child wearing a sweater that said “coolest monkey in the jungle.” This sweater is not only derogatory but it was taken to huge offense by the African-American community, who did not take this issue lightly. Not only were ties cut with multiple celebrities, but H&M also saw one of the biggest drops in sales of the decade, according to CNBC.

In addition to social racism, the United States is recognized for its institutionalized racism in the criminal justice system. One out of three black males will be incarcerated in their lifetime, this is not by coincidence but because of such high racial profiling numbers, according to the Netflix film “13TH.” We live in a world where the system benefits the rich and guilty rather than the poor and innocent. Racism is embedded in the system, it appears to die but in reality, it is reborn in different ways. If one out of three men will see the inside of prison, then that means that one-third of the African American population cannot vote. There is a clear line of repetition here, the system is denying citizens the right to vote based on their criminal record yet the chances of a white male being incarcerated are nowhere near the same as a black male. Once again, this means that the only ones hurting are African Americans. The government needs to enforce equality, starting with President Donald Trump, whose ideologies favor racial discrimination and profiling.

History tends to repeat itself, just when it looks like change has occurred there are still a few institutionalized behaviors that bring the entire community back down. Although America has come a long way, and people like Rosa Parks, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and President Lyndon B. Johnson opened greater opportunities for all, there is still more that has to be done. Social movements continue to rise as they feel unfairness and unequal support from the government, it was not too long ago that Black Lives Matter became a phenomenon. Unfortunately, Americans still feel the need to protest, aspiring for their voice to finally be heard.

The witch, as the Puritans saw her/him, was ultimately a man-made creation synonymous with the supernatural, sorcerers, and ghosts. Salem was a quarrelsome village and less prosperous than Salem Town. The inhabitants were divided over almost everything — the church, politics, where to divide the land, deaths, and an immense and irrational fear of the dense forest. This ultimately led to hysteria which manifested in the tragedy that would become the Salem Witch Trials. When discussing the question “What is a witch?” witches have been perceived and written about in various ways and different descriptions have been used, but there are general types of witches that can be pointed out in almost any story. Society has always viewed witches as evil characters, devil worshippers, seductresses, or scorned women. When in fact the term witch holds so much more meaning than that and has affected a wide range of people who all have different circumstances in history. Most historians tend to be in one of these two camps. The first camp is that historians would write about society, religion, and gender as they are topics that blend in well with each other. The second camp is emotion and law, though these may seem opposite to each other with the reading I’ve done it seems historians can’t write one without the other. They write about the pain the trials caused and the mass hysteria that came with the legal proceedings of the trials. Society, religion, gender, emotion, and law, are the aspects that make up the study of history cornering witches in America, all of these topics will show the kaleidoscope of aspects that come along with this study.

Society in Massachusetts during 1692 was incredibly rigid and religion-based, everyone followed the role that they were set in and people viewed anyone different very harshly. So at the prospect of anyone different that went against the flow of society, those people were pointed out and judged. Witchcraft was something the people of Salem feared because they used it to try and explain the terrible things that would happen around them that couldn’t be explained by any normal means. Examples would be sickness, famine, an epidemic, or someone speaking or acting in a way that was deemed inappropriate. Salem Town and Village living was set in a very concrete pattern. Life was centered around the church and anything that went against the church was incorrect. The people who lived in Salem at this time were called Puritans and to them, the church was neither a building nor social institution, but rather a place where a group of “chosen” people would gather, which was the minister and men of his choosing. This group of people would spread God’s word to the community and those teachings would be what controlled the community. The “witches” that were convicted and executed were simple townspeople trying to survive in a religiously strict Puritanical society. Anyone could have been accused of being a witch it could have been a person who was seen doing some sort of cooking or making something that could have been seen as magic, a doctor who was only trying to do his job, or a midwife who lost many children in a row that causes people to look at them with suspicion, someone who fought a lot with their neighbors and maybe caused them harm, or a person that is related to someone that was already previously accused of witchcraft. An example of which beliefs would be someone who kept a journal, animals would hang around them, or a person who physically appeared different from other people. People in Salem would use anything as “evidence” and if the church found that evidence plausible enough they would arrest the woman, man, or even child in question. Executions were a big part of the witch trials as the community would gather together to view a hanging or a drawing of an accused. Fourteen of these executed individuals at the beginning of the trials were women. One of the first three accused was a slave from South America, Tituba. Another of the accused, Dorothy (Dorcas Good), was just four years old. Her mother, Sarah Good, was the second accused and convicted. The last of the three women was Sarah Osbourne who owned her property and came into money when her husband died. The trials were unjust (often “witnesses” would use spectral evidence in their accusations and the judges would maintain that a “witch” is guilty unless they admit that they have signed the devil’s book). The punishments for witchcraft were cruel and unusual — ranging from prison cells only large enough for one individual to stand in pressings. Society as a whole was very toxic at this time Neighbors would turn against neighbors for the smallest misconduct or for something they simply disliked about the other person, and the only time they would come together was to prosecute a person they deemed dangerous to them.

As discussed before the church was the center of the town, and this fact made religion the thing that loomed over Salem and most of the colonies in this period. Religion was something that people took seriously and it affected the way they viewed the world around them and the people around them. The Puritans were a group of English settlers who founded New England. (Talk about John Calvin and the Puritans and their beliefs) As stated in the paragraph about society the church officials were ministers and people who were elected or deemed fit to practice in the church. The Puritan society was set in a way where church officials were at the top, and then normal men and women were placed last in Salem’s hierarchy. This circumstance was one of the reasons it was so simple to accuse a woman as they were already second to all the men that surrounded them, though men were also accused of witchcraft occasionally. The teachings of the Bible were taught from a young age and children could recite scripture. In this time religion ruled over everyone and caused people to view others and the world through the church’s teachings.

During the witch trials, a person’s gender could mean life or death. Since accusations could come from anyone and anywhere. The women who would break society’s rules or act in any strange way had a target placed on their backs. In the time of 1692, a lot of judges and men were still sexist and thought women should be placed under them in the social hierarchy of Salem. In terms of gender women were the most accused and prosecuted, but both men and children also were accused of witchcraft. The practice of magic has been documented long before the Salem witch trials it has been written about since the trials that occured in England and other places in the European world. There are so many stories and legends about witches in the world, that there are similarities between them. They relate to each other so much, especially in terms of how they describe women, a woman will be almost always written about in a negative light. She could be called evil, vain, a sureness, wrongly powerful, or someone shunned from society. When a woman was one of these many things in Europe or during the time of the Salem Witch Trials she would have been accused of being a witch. General points about women who were accused were women who were married, widowed, and could range from the young ages of twenty to forty, and predominantly the ages of forty-one to seventy. It was more likely for elder women to be accused than younger male or female witches since they were not the main suspects. Prosecutors would look for women who were old and acted differently from the others around them, midwives whose babies regularly died, young women who did not marry at normal times, women who had an unprecedented amount of power from owning their dead husband’s property, and any women who would challenge the Puritan doctrine and challenged established religious and political hierarchy would be targeted as a witch. Though men and children were the minority when being accused or killed there was still a great amount of them being affected by the trials. Most of the time men who were accused would be accused if their wife was involved. If a man stood in the way of a trial for his wife he could also be accused of witchcraft for trying to help someone who was “damned”. An example of a man would be George Jacobs, when accused he tried to flee but was captured and his wife was also taken into custody as the town thought she had a “crazy” type of behavior. The ages of men who were accused could range from twenty to seventy as well but compared to the ratio of people killed men would be forty-two to the female count of one hundred and twenty. The ratio of men killed never became higher than the amount of women killed. Children were rarely killed but sometimes if a mother was accused their children would be looked at and could be brought in, it was more likely if they were female.

The Salem Witch Trials could undoubtedly be considered an emotional time. The consequences of the Salem witch trials affected Massachusetts and most of America for years after the witch hunt ended. This event holds historical value as historians and everyday people know the horrors of what occurred in Salem. It is still being researched, because like all history this event affected people’s lives and caused pain and death from beginning to end. The paranoia caused by the trials affected people’s everyday lives, people watched what they would do or say in fear of any of their neighbors accusing them of witchcraft. A person would give up their friends to save themselves if it meant taking the public’s eye off of them and onto someone else. No one wanted to go through the painful tests the church used to see if a person was a witch. One of the most horrible tests included tying a rock to a person’s foot and seeing if they would float, if the accused floated they were a witch while an innocent person would simply sink to the bottom. This test caused many deaths as people would indeed sink to the bottom, but no one would pull them out of the lake until it was too late.

Some people didn’t get tested instead they would be tried in court, if they were found guilty the accused witch would be sentenced to hanging. The witch trials would bring the community together as the entire town would show up to the sentencing. As cruel as the trials were in reality it was a form of entertainment to the people of Salem. The legal aspects of a witch trial introduced trial juries, the appearance of a legal council which be the defense and official government prosecutors. Though there was a defendant there were no lawyers for the accused and a normal trial was filled with paranoia and superstition. Any case in Salem was not controlled by the government’s law book but instead, by the beliefs shared by the jurors, witness, the accused, and even the judge. If a judgment was not reached in court alone the accused would go through a set of ordeals or tests that would be performed to see if someone was a witch. For example the drawing test, or more commonly a doctor would check a person’s body for a witch mark. A witch mark could be any strange thing the doctor found on the accused body, either a mole or a strange birthmark. More often than not even the slightest defect was used to accuse someone of being a witch. In all the one thing a witch trial lacked was the aspect of fairness, “innocent until proven guilty” didn’t tend to apply in these cases, and the result usually was the death by hanging of an innocent person.

In the end, the witch trials though did not last longer than a year the effect they had on women, Salem, and the rest of America will always be remembered. The term witch was popularly used as a bad thing or a person with evil intentions by historians and writers for many years. The term was used to prosecute women and other people who simply stood out from others or acted in a way that deviated from the norms of society. These trials allow historians to look back and piece apart the effects they had on women, as these women and others were hunted for being open-minded, free from the rules placed on them, or outspoken. This time in history allows people to analyze not only the negative effects of human paranoia but also women and others in society who were not considered part of society.

Anjez Gonxhe Bojaxhiu, or Mother Teresa as she is now known around the world, was a key figure in the Catholic Church both during her lifetime and after her death. She was appreciated by Christians and non-Christians alike for her work in alleviating poverty and assisting the downtrodden in Calcutta’s worst neighborhoods. Her trophy case is brimming with medals ranging from the Ramon Magsaysay Peace Prize to the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979, reinforcing her reputation as a tireless advocate for those in need.

Even today, the first image that springs to mind when her name is mentioned is of a devout woman with the purest intentions and a smile that welcomed everyone into her grace. The fact, however, may differ significantly from this perspective. Over the years, many individuals have questioned Mother Teresa’s acts and motives, accusing her of romanticizing people’s suffering. This is a deep dive into the dark side of Saint Mother Teresa, from her dubious methods in the Missionaries of Charity to her dubious ways of handling money given to her by equally shady people.

A Dive Into Hell’s Angel

The first of many complaints about Teresa’s work surfaced in a 1994 documentary titled ‘Hell’s Angel.’ Someone who was a volunteer in Teresa’s missionary work spearheaded the documentary. This indicated that the assertions being presented had some validity. The hygiene of the soup kitchens and hospices was harshly criticized in the documentary. Various eyewitness testimonies alleged that under Mother Teresa’s watchful eye, there was little regard for the safety of critically ill people. This disdain was demonstrated by the use of the same needles for a variety of different individuals seeking therapy.

Because there was no sterilizing in the procedure, there was a very high risk of infection. Surprisingly, these misdeeds occurred in a facility with AIDS patients who were already immunocompromised. Another eyewitness reported that no one at these facilities was medically trained and had weak abilities in dealing with people who had already accepted death. Teresa was making use of these folks to build her image of compassion rather than truly caring for them, it can be inferred.

Could Lack Of Adequate Funds Have Been The Prime Cause?

Many people would assume that operating in a poor country like India meant that there was a shortage of funding, resulting in deplorable conditions at the hospices. This assertion, however, is untrue, as Mother Teresa alone raised nearly $30 million from numerous benefactors across the world. The operation has more than enough funds to run smoothly. Instead, no attempt was made to improve the people’s living conditions in any way.

Teresa’s and the other missionaries’ refusal to build water heaters at specific camps reflects her concern for her public image more than the frigid water in which the patients bathed. Donald McIntyre went undercover to volunteer for Teresa in one of her hospices and discovered comparable neglect and even abuse. According to his claims, children and the mentally sick were frequently tied up with ropes and garments to be fed or kept stationary. These apparent abuses of human rights were dismissed and never linked to Mother Teresa’s holier-than-thou demeanor.

What About Her Elite Friends In High Places?

Mother Teresa socialized with the wrong people, as she was someone who had been canonized in Christian literature. Regardless of their conduct, she was known to make friends with anyone who gave to her cause. Teresa accepted gifts and awards from those who were participating in large-scale Christian genocides all around the world. This included Ronald Reagan, the US President and archbishop of San Salvador during the Cold War, who was accused of orchestrating the mass murder of Catholic nuns.

This was extremely hypocritical for someone who had dedicated her life to helping lives. She was also associated with prominent business tycoons such as Charles Keating, who was eventually convicted of fraud and racketeering for his shady loan dealings. This demonstrated Teresa’s preference for accumulating money (which, by the way, was not even used to improve the lives of the sick) over genuine generosity.

Who Was Mother Theresa: A Saint Or A Fraud?

Teresa’s life was canonized in the Roman Catholic Church in 2016, when Pope Francis I bestowed the title of Saint, one of the highest honors bestowed on its members. To be recognized as a Saint, a person must perform two known miracles that are then recognized and accepted by the Catholic Church. In 1998 and 2008, Teresa experienced two miracles. Monica Besra, a woman from Bengal, stated that after praying to Mother Teresa, she was cured of her tumor-related ailment. The Church formally recognized this as a miracle in 2002.

Monica, according to several stories, was cured by the doctors more than Teresa, and it was the regular treatment that saved her, according to one of her husbands. Various medical reports backed up this claim, although these claims were later retracted. The Catholic Church appears to be more concerned with this miracle than with the science behind benign tumors. Following Teresa’s death in 1997, a Brazilian guy with numerous brain tumors reported a miracle in 2008. The Catholic Church completed its investigation in just seven days, and Pope Francis eventually bestowed the title of Saint on Mother Teresa.

An Unbiased Conclusion On The Life Of Mother Theresa

Mother Teresa of Calcutta is without a doubt a woman who dedicated her life to helping the destitute and sick. Her years of struggle demonstrate that she desired to create a story in which she aided others. Mother Teresa’s selflessness, however, was not black and white; with all of the firsthand accounts and criticism that her deeds have elicited, it is easy to argue that her life is a gray region that is far from ideal or perfection, as many tend to claim.

Ruby Bridges, a young African-American girl, made history in 1960 when she became the first African-American student to integrate an all-white school in the South. Her courageous act of attending William Frantz Elementary School in New Orleans symbolizes the strength and determination of the civil rights movement. This essay will explore the significant impact Ruby Bridges had on the fight for equality through her bravery, resilience, and lasting legacy.

Firstly, Ruby Bridges displayed immense bravery throughout her journey as a trailblazer for integration. At just six years old, she faced a hostile and racially divided environment every day. Despite facing threats, protests, and a daily barrage of insults, Ruby remained composed and focused on her education. She showed remarkable maturity beyond her years, demonstrating that even young individuals can stand up against injustice and discrimination. Her bravery challenged the status quo and inspired others to confront prejudice head-on.

Secondly, Ruby’s resilience was evident in her unwavering commitment to her education. Despite the hostile atmosphere, Ruby continued attending school, determined to receive an equal education. Her perseverance in the face of adversity highlighted the power of education as a means of empowerment and social change. Ruby’s presence at William Frantz Elementary School challenged the deep-rooted segregation policies of the time, paving the way for future generations to access quality education without discrimination.

Furthermore, Ruby Bridges’ journey did not end with her historic integration of William Frantz Elementary School. Her story continued to inspire countless individuals and shed light on the importance of equality in education. Ruby’s bravery caught the attention of the media, bringing national and international awareness to the struggles of African-American students during the civil rights movement. Her story served as a catalyst for change, spurring conversations and efforts to dismantle segregation in schools across the country. Ruby’s impact reached far beyond her personal experience, serving as a beacon of hope for those fighting for equality.

Ruby Bridges’ lasting legacy is perhaps one of her most significant contributions to the civil rights movement. As an adult, she became a prominent advocate for education and equality. She established the Ruby Bridges Foundation, which aims to promote tolerance, respect, and social harmony among children. Through her foundation, Ruby continues to work towards creating inclusive and equitable learning environments for all students, regardless of their background or race. Her dedication to fostering understanding and breaking down barriers remains an inspiration to future generations.

In conclusion, Ruby Bridges’ courage, resilience, and lasting legacy make her a pivotal figure in the fight for equality. At a young age, she demonstrated tremendous bravery in the face of hatred and discrimination. Her determination to receive an equal education and her subsequent impact on the civil rights movement cannot be overstated. Ruby’s story serves as a reminder that individuals of all ages can make a significant difference in the pursuit of justice and equality. Her unwavering commitment to education and her ongoing advocacy efforts highlight the power of one individual to ignite change and inspire others. Ruby Bridges’ legacy continues to shine brightly, reminding us of the importance of equality, understanding, and compassion in our society.

Introduction

Marilyn Monroe, born Norma Jeane Mortenson, remains one of the most iconic figures in Hollywood history. Her captivating beauty, undeniable talent, and tumultuous personal life have made her a subject of fascination for decades. In this research essay, we will delve into the life and legacy of Marilyn Monroe, exploring her early years, rise to stardom, impact on popular culture, and the tragic circumstances surrounding her untimely death.

I. Early Life and Career

Marilyn Monroe was born on June 1, 1926, in Los Angeles, California. From a young age, she faced a challenging upbringing, with a tumultuous family life and a lack of stability. She spent much of her childhood in foster care and orphanages, which greatly influenced her later struggles with identity and self-worth.

Monroe’s journey into the entertainment industry began when she was discovered by a photographer while working in a munitions factory during World War II. Her unique beauty and natural charisma caught the attention of talent agents, leading to modeling opportunities and eventually a contract with Twentieth Century-Fox. Under the guidance of studio executives, Monroe underwent a transformation, changing her name and honing her acting skills.

II. Rise to Stardom

Monroe’s breakthrough role came in 1950 with the film “The Asphalt Jungle,” which showcased her raw talent and undeniable screen presence. However, it was her unforgettable performance in “Niagara” (1953) that solidified her status as a sex symbol. Monroe’s captivating allure, combined with her vulnerability and innocence, made her a captivating figure on the silver screen.

Throughout the 1950s and early 1960s, Monroe starred in several successful films, including “Gentlemen Prefer Blondes” (1953), “Some Like It Hot” (1959), and “The Misfits” (1961). Her on-screen performances were praised for their comedic timing, charm, and ability to tap into deeper emotional depths.

III. Impact on Popular Culture

Marilyn Monroe’s influence on popular culture cannot be overstated. Her image, with her platinum blonde hair, hourglass figure, and radiant smile, became synonymous with beauty and sensuality. She challenged traditional beauty standards of the time, embracing her curves and exuding confidence in her own skin.

Monroe’s impact extended beyond her physical appearance. She portrayed complex and flawed female characters, challenging societal norms and expectations. In films like “Bus Stop” (1956) and “The Seven Year Itch” (1955), she tackled themes of female empowerment, sexuality, and the search for identity. Monroe’s performances resonated with audiences and sparked conversations about gender roles and the portrayal of women in Hollywood.

IV. Tragic Personal Life

Despite her success, Marilyn Monroe’s personal life was plagued by turmoil and emotional distress. She endured multiple failed marriages, including high-profile relationships with Joe DiMaggio and playwright Arthur Miller. Her struggles with mental health, substance abuse, and the pressures of fame took a toll on her well-being.

On August 5, 1962, Marilyn Monroe was found dead in her Brentwood, California, home. Her death was ruled as a probable suicide by drug overdose. The circumstances surrounding her untimely demise have fueled countless conspiracy theories and speculation, adding to the enigma surrounding her life and legacy.

V. Legacy and Cultural Significance

Marilyn Monroe’s legacy continues to captivate audiences and inspire artists across various mediums. Her image and quotes are reproduced and referenced in popular culture, and her name has become synonymous with beauty, vulnerability, and stardom. Monroe’s enduring influence can be seen in the works of contemporary artists, such as Madonna, Lady Gaga, and countless others who have paid tribute to her in their music and performances.

Moreover, Monroe’s life and struggles have sparked conversations about mental health, the treatment of women in the entertainment industry, and the price of fame. She remains an enduring symbol of vulnerability and strength, with her story serving as a cautionary tale about the perils of celebrity culture and the dark side of the American Dream.

Conclusion

Marilyn Monroe’s life and legacy are a tapestry of beauty, talent, and tragedy. From her humble beginnings to her meteoric rise to stardom, Monroe captivated audiences with her on-screen presence and off-screen persona. Her impact on popular culture, her ability to challenge societal norms, and her enduring status as an icon make her a figure worthy of exploration and analysis. Despite the personal struggles she faced, Monroe’s legacy lives on, reminding us of the complexities of fame, the power of beauty, and the fragile nature of the human spirit.

Ruby Bridges, a young African-American girl, made history in 1960 when she became the first African-American student to integrate an all-white school in the South. Her courageous act of attending William Frantz Elementary School in New Orleans symbolizes the strength and determination of the civil rights movement. This essay will explore the significant impact Ruby Bridges had on the fight for equality through her bravery, resilience, and lasting legacy.

Firstly, Ruby Bridges displayed immense bravery throughout her journey as a trailblazer for integration. At just six years old, she faced a hostile and racially divided environment every day. Despite facing threats, protests, and a daily barrage of insults, Ruby remained composed and focused on her education. She showed remarkable maturity beyond her years, demonstrating that even young individuals can stand up against injustice and discrimination. Her bravery challenged the status quo and inspired others to confront prejudice head-on.

Secondly, Ruby’s resilience was evident in her unwavering commitment to her education. Despite the hostile atmosphere, Ruby continued attending school, determined to receive an equal education. Her perseverance in the face of adversity highlighted the power of education as a means of empowerment and social change. Ruby’s presence at William Frantz Elementary School challenged the deep-rooted segregation policies of the time, paving the way for future generations to access quality education without discrimination.

Furthermore, Ruby Bridges’ journey did not end with her historic integration of William Frantz Elementary School. Her story continued to inspire countless individuals and shed light on the importance of equality in education. Ruby’s bravery caught the attention of the media, bringing national and international awareness to the struggles of African-American students during the civil rights movement. Her story served as a catalyst for change, spurring conversations and efforts to dismantle segregation in schools across the country. Ruby’s impact reached far beyond her personal experience, serving as a beacon of hope for those fighting for equality.

Ruby Bridges’ lasting legacy is perhaps one of her most significant contributions to the civil rights movement. As an adult, she became a prominent advocate for education and equality. She established the Ruby Bridges Foundation, which aims to promote tolerance, respect, and social harmony among children. Through her foundation, Ruby continues to work towards creating inclusive and equitable learning environments for all students, regardless of their background or race. Her dedication to fostering understanding and breaking down barriers remains an inspiration to future generations.

In conclusion, Ruby Bridges’ courage, resilience, and lasting legacy make her a pivotal figure in the fight for equality. At a young age, she demonstrated tremendous bravery in the face of hatred and discrimination. Her determination to receive an equal education and her subsequent impact on the civil rights movement cannot be overstated. Ruby’s story serves as a reminder that individuals of all ages can make a significant difference in the pursuit of justice and equality. Her unwavering commitment to education and her ongoing advocacy efforts highlight the power of one individual to ignite change and inspire others. Ruby Bridges’ legacy continues to shine brightly, reminding us of the importance of equality, understanding, and compassion in our society.

Introduction

Marilyn Monroe, born Norma Jeane Mortenson, remains one of the most iconic figures in Hollywood history. Her captivating beauty, undeniable talent, and tumultuous personal life have made her a subject of fascination for decades. In this research essay, we will delve into the life and legacy of Marilyn Monroe, exploring her early years, rise to stardom, impact on popular culture, and the tragic circumstances surrounding her untimely death.

I. Early Life and Career

Marilyn Monroe was born on June 1, 1926, in Los Angeles, California. From a young age, she faced a challenging upbringing, with a tumultuous family life and a lack of stability. She spent much of her childhood in foster care and orphanages, which greatly influenced her later struggles with identity and self-worth.

Monroe’s journey into the entertainment industry began when she was discovered by a photographer while working in a munitions factory during World War II. Her unique beauty and natural charisma caught the attention of talent agents, leading to modeling opportunities and eventually a contract with Twentieth Century-Fox. Under the guidance of studio executives, Monroe underwent a transformation, changing her name and honing her acting skills.

II. Rise to Stardom

Monroe’s breakthrough role came in 1950 with the film “The Asphalt Jungle,” which showcased her raw talent and undeniable screen presence. However, it was her unforgettable performance in “Niagara” (1953) that solidified her status as a sex symbol. Monroe’s captivating allure, combined with her vulnerability and innocence, made her a captivating figure on the silver screen.

Throughout the 1950s and early 1960s, Monroe starred in several successful films, including “Gentlemen Prefer Blondes” (1953), “Some Like It Hot” (1959), and “The Misfits” (1961). Her on-screen performances were praised for their comedic timing, charm, and ability to tap into deeper emotional depths.

III. Impact on Popular Culture

Marilyn Monroe’s influence on popular culture cannot be overstated. Her image, with her platinum blonde hair, hourglass figure, and radiant smile, became synonymous with beauty and sensuality. She challenged traditional beauty standards of the time, embracing her curves and exuding confidence in her own skin.

Monroe’s impact extended beyond her physical appearance. She portrayed complex and flawed female characters, challenging societal norms and expectations. In films like “Bus Stop” (1956) and “The Seven Year Itch” (1955), she tackled themes of female empowerment, sexuality, and the search for identity. Monroe’s performances resonated with audiences and sparked conversations about gender roles and the portrayal of women in Hollywood.

IV. Tragic Personal Life

Despite her success, Marilyn Monroe’s personal life was plagued by turmoil and emotional distress. She endured multiple failed marriages, including high-profile relationships with Joe DiMaggio and playwright Arthur Miller. Her struggles with mental health, substance abuse, and the pressures of fame took a toll on her well-being.

On August 5, 1962, Marilyn Monroe was found dead in her Brentwood, California, home. Her death was ruled as a probable suicide by drug overdose. The circumstances surrounding her untimely demise have fueled countless conspiracy theories and speculation, adding to the enigma surrounding her life and legacy.

V. Legacy and Cultural Significance

Marilyn Monroe’s legacy continues to captivate audiences and inspire artists across various mediums. Her image and quotes are reproduced and referenced in popular culture, and her name has become synonymous with beauty, vulnerability, and stardom. Monroe’s enduring influence can be seen in the works of contemporary artists, such as Madonna, Lady Gaga, and countless others who have paid tribute to her in their music and performances.

Moreover, Monroe’s life and struggles have sparked conversations about mental health, the treatment of women in the entertainment industry, and the price of fame. She remains an enduring symbol of vulnerability and strength, with her story serving as a cautionary tale about the perils of celebrity culture and the dark side of the American Dream.

Conclusion

Marilyn Monroe’s life and legacy are a tapestry of beauty, talent, and tragedy. From her humble beginnings to her meteoric rise to stardom, Monroe captivated audiences with her on-screen presence and off-screen persona. Her impact on popular culture, her ability to challenge societal norms, and her enduring status as an icon make her a figure worthy of exploration and analysis. Despite the personal struggles she faced, Monroe’s legacy lives on, reminding us of the complexities of fame, the power of beauty, and the fragile nature of the human spirit.

To begin with, a Legacy can be looked at as a worthwhile contribution resulting from boosted thinking and caliber for learning that an individual translates to others so that it is available to the organization’s future generation of managers, employees and other stakeholders. In order for a legacy to be successfully passed on it must be digested and absorbed by others. To add on to this, a manager’s legacy can involve the ability to build new ways of thinking and strengthening others’ latitude to learn, to reflect and to gather meaning from their learning in order to leave something of enduring quality behind for the organization and the workers involved. In doing so, it improves how daily business is conducted so that new levels of organizational and individual maturity can be achieved. Knowledge plays a vital role in leaving an unforgettable legacy in an organization and works well when we decide to focus less on what is owned, rather target more on what can be known interns of ‘intellectual-capital-acceleration’. Furthermore, in the process where a manager plans on leaving a legacy in an organization, a few ideas may be taken into consideration. For example; brainstorming on what exactly should be done in order to be remembered for by colleagues, customers and external stakeholders in relation to your roles in the organization (operating systems that don’t exist now might there be). Secondly, reasoning on what can be started to do now or change now to be able to achieve the system made. Then, ruminating on how the operating system decided on might bring about change both to the firm and the stakeholders involved. Then creating a model that can be presented to the firm explaining on how the operating system can successfully work. When approved by owners and working colleagues involved, then implementation and monitoring can be done!

Moreover, there are some qualities that as a manager, should work hand in hand in order for a legacy to be invented. Primarily, one must be fixated on the vision that is in the making to be brought into being. Following that, a manager must be headstrong in operating in a positive attitude mindset which always looks for positive results despite the circumstances being faced etc. having said that, it is not only important for a manager with a goal to create a legacy to work with the positive qualities but as well build legacy by eliminating behaviors and attitudes that weakens impact. It’s not enough to add positive behaviors but eliminate the bad. For example; Bitterness, anger, and fear, Consumerism, activities that suppress priorities, Defeatism (having an ‘It won’t matter’ mentality). In the most vibrant way, building a legacy at work can be one of the most fulfilling things a manager can do. And not only that, it outlives and keeps you relevant and present when you are no longer there as it is passed on traditionally from one generation and to the next in the working organization!

FORMS OF CREATING A LEGACY

There are divergent ways for a manager’s legacy to become a visible reality in an organization. Headmost, a manager must be able to ‘joyfully officiate in daily activities’ (Serve in ways that bring a sense of liveliness among the employees or co-workers). As a result managers should be able to work in an organization with a positive attitude regardless of the good cultures or laboring in somewhat toxic cultures as well. In doing so, their working life is made much easier with a noteworthy attitude. In not doing so, angry and unhappy managers leading a firm/organisation leave sad legacies which will eventually be eradicated from existence. Therefrom, whether good or bad, managers have the ability to choose to remain positive and optimistic despite their working environment. This is often easier said than done in broad standpoints though. However, managers in varying industries of specializations that are consistently positive, have a reputation for uplifting people around them, of whom may have a perspective of metaphorically complaining because ‘rose bushes have thorns’, into vivid individuals that rejoice because ‘thorn bushes have roses’! And as a result, their legacy is helping others see the ‘roses’ everywhere!

In relation to such a metaphor, we can look at for example, a manager encouraging his or her employees to continue participating in a training program which the employees themselves may be reluctant to as they do not see a long term picture of the kind of skills and new ideas of how they will be able to functionally work with improved quality and quantity and as well as with efficiency and effectiveness. When the manager succeeds in pushing them. Eventually the workers will come to visualize the new skills and techniques they have acquired from the training program. And this supports the metaphor mentioned above.

Alternatively, a manager should mobilize a form of ‘thinking service not profit’ as a way of forging a legacy into existence. Relatively speaking, a manager should be able to have an insight that in forming a long lasting value in a firm, he/she must progress in functions that patronize stakeholders in the organization and not involve themselves in self-fulfilling exertions. Let us take for instance, when we think of men and women in history who have left an enduring legacy on the mass of people worldwide. We often realize that those individuals are, and for some, were ‘givers’ in every sense of the word. Some examples include: Isaac Newton (of whom is famous for formulating the ‘three laws of motion which laid the foundation of classical mechanics’! And as well as being the first to formulate the notion of gravity as a universal force, and inventing calculus, and discovering the generalized binomial theorem back in 1665!) Moreover we also have Bill gates, (who established Microsoft which is the most successful computer software company today! And as well as making the PC docs operation system deal with the International Business Machines (IBM) and so on). As if that’s not enough, we have Martin Luther King Jr., (who led the Montgomery bus boycott on December 1, 1955 and being the soul reason behind African Americans getting basic civil rights all the way back in 1964!) In supplement we look into Mother Theresa (who dedicated her life to serving the poor and the sick and also established the missionaries of charity, opened the Kalighat Home for the Dying, opened up the Nirmala Shishu Bhavan to take care of homeless children), and lastly Socrates to name a few, (who was responsible for using philosophy as a tool to make society better by teaching a system of rational ethics to the young men and future leaders of Athens, using the Socratic Method, a system of questioning to reach an answer which helped the people come to rational conclusions). All of them mentioned chose to give to others first as they were smart enough to know that what is put into the lives of others comes back as a retribution. On account of what has been exhausted, those who leave legacies at work and in this world do so by giving first and receiving last.

With progression, a manager should ‘Choose to think BIG’ as a means in order to project their legacy onto others taking part in an active organization. Now in thinking big, one should be able to firstly, know their selves in order to develop and maximize their talent, strengths, and skills. For a manager, this remarkably comes convenient when it comes to see the potential that lies within the people of whom you work with. Take for example in the field of work, where employees are able to recognize that a manager whom they are working under, is able to see the best in them and knows that they can achieve great things even when they filled with doubt. In such a footing these employee will most likely never forget such managers as they helped them become a better and woke individuals that they turned out to be. In as much as what has been explained, when we choose to think of the big possibilities that exist within the people around us, we create an enduring bond and energy that can fuel the organization concerned. As a result, when managers look for the positive in their employees, it composes the working-for-knowledge-journey mentality that is much better for both the employees and the corporation itself. And as a bonus, it even make the whole organization love what they do.

Conclusively, managers should be able to ‘Choose to embrace the big team‘ and monitor their impact on others. Here one should be able to evaluate activities that are being done that make the biggest difference and doing more of that. To hitch on what has been said, for managers to enact a solid legacy, they must bind their co-workers or employees together as a single force with the goal to remain strong and goal-focused. In order to embrace the big team, managers should have an idea that in order for them to be remembered, they must implant the idea that teams are much stronger when they realize that all the functions that they perform from their varying stations are interconnected. In contrast, the feeble organizations are filled with people who are on the look out for their lone desires without concern for the good of the whole organization. Personally, the most memorable managers are those who put the needs of the team or organization ahead of their own. For a fact, I would take a chance to say that managers who hold the ideology of ‘I’ are in most cases not respected and would be voted off of any firm if the moment presented itself. In effect, for managers to have an enduring legacy they must be the persons who embraces the big TEAM and choose to find a way to use their resources for the benefit of all.

IMPORTANCE OF LEAVING A LEGACY

The significance of handing over a legacy begins to manifest with history when we think about those who left a legacy for us to follow. For example; Abraham Lincoln, (who freed the slaves by issuing the Emancipation Proclamation and as well as signing the first of the homestead acts, allowing poor people to obtain land, established the united states department of agriculture and signing the Morril Land-Grant Act which led to the creation of numerous universities, instituting the first official thanksgiving day, coining the American Greenback Dollar, Authorizing the first Railroad connecting the Atlantic and Pacific coasts), more also, the many men and women in Zambia who fought for our sovereignty so that we can live in freedom and safety, John F. Kennedy (who called us to explore space and set us on course to have a man walk on the moon, also took the U.S economy out of recession through his reforms, and with great effort, JFK averted the nuclear war through his negotiations with the Soviet leader named Khrushchev), and lastly, Martin Luther King Jr., (who left us a legacy to pursue the dream of racial equality). The list goes on from there. Undoubtedly, there are figuratively thousands of men and women who lived in a way that affects our lives today both in Zambia and worldwide. And for some they are the same people we knew and the people we lived with who intensely shaped us.

Ultimately, a legacy can be anywhere whether household, government and the business enterprise environment and it all depends on how we live our lives. How we live our lives is critically important because in relevance to corporation related matters, it is important to leave an appealing legacy for the following reasons;

First of all, it is part of the ongoing foundation of life of an organization. Managers who came before leave employees with an existing firm in which they function in. Those who come after will have only what current managers leave them. Thus, managers can be looked as guardians for an organization and have a calling to leave it better than how it was found, even if it seems like only a small part.

Continuously, it has the raw power for success and for failure of an organisation. There are managers who have changed firms for good and opened up new worlds for millions of other managers and employees, and those who have driven others on to new heights. And, conversely, there are people who have caused huge downfalls, people who left a wake of a drawback behind them wherever they managed or worked. In all, what managers do affects the success or failure of an organisation. It is important that not only managers but workers or employees and stakeholders in coordination to work together to ensure the success and survival of an organisation.

Furthermore, it is an act of responsibility to leave a legacy. Because of the power in the way managers do their line of work in leading an organisation and the legacy they choose to leave is a great responsibility and must be that of a positive legacy. All good men and women in management and in function as employees or workers must take responsibility to create legacies that will take the next generation of the firm involved to a greater level imaginable. In belief, there is a part of what makes us good and honorable people in business, is having an introductory part of our lives based on the goal of leaving a legacy.

Progressively, the importance of leaving a legacy in an organisation breaks the cycle in pursuing selfish goals that can be deep-rooted in us all. When we strive to leave a legacy, we are acting with a selflessness that can only be beneficial for everyone in the corporation involved. Contradictory, someone could work hard to earn money so that when he or she dies a building is named after them, but that is not the kind of legacy we are talking about. Rather, we are talking about legacies that make the working environment better for those who come after us, not about our own fame or recognition, but about helping others. After all, we won’t be around to watch our legacy. To build that which will last beyond us is selfless, and living with that in mind breaks the power of selfishness that tries to engulf itself in our lives.

Lastly, leaving a legacy in an organisation is vital because it keeps us focused on the big picture. Legacy building is part of the ‘big picture in an institution.’ It keeps us focused on the long term and gives us values that we can evaluate or functions at work. When we are acting based on selfishness, personal visions and the like, we are having are minds focused on the ‘small picture’ on whatever that is sensible right now. Therefore, leaving behind a legacy serves an enormous effect when we are building a life that will serve for many in the business society.

CONCLUSION

In discontinuation, we have looked at how a Legacy can be looked at as a worthwhile contribution resulting from boosted thinking and caliber for learning that an individual translates to others, so that it is available to the organization’s future. And as well as discussed the important qualities that as a manager, should work hand in hand in order for a legacy to be invented. we have also looked at the different ways for a manager’s legacy to become a visible reality in an organization and they were that managers should; joyfully officiate in daily activities, thinking service not profit, Choose to think BIG and lastly, to Choose to embrace the big team. To add on to this we have saturated on the significance of leaving a legacy in an organisation as already discussed the importance collaborates with historical times where we look at how different peoples actions influenced what kind of legacy they left for the existing generation. And these people were: Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr., to name a few. In continuity we then focused on how it is important for people to leave legacies and the reasons involved legacies being; part of the ongoing foundation of life of an organization, a raw power for success and for failure, an act of responsibility to leave a legacy, able to break the cycle in pursuing selfish goals and that it keeps us focused on the big picture.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Leaving a Legacy: Intergenerational Allocations of Benefits and Burdens by Kimberly A. Wade-Benzoni, Harris Sondak, and Adam D. Galinsky
2. Creating A Lasting Legacy by O’ Brien & Wolf, L.L.P
3. Leaving a legacy by David R. Bue PF’s Vice President of Development
4. Beyond Death: Inheriting The Past and Giving To The Future, Transmitting the Legacy of One Self by Elizabeth G. Hunter
5. Leaving a Legacy: Toward a Topology by Elizabeth G Hunter and Graham D. Rowles
6. How to Leave a Legacy at work (& in life) – Scott Mautz
7. Article in 10 Ways To Build Powerful Legacy Now by Dan Rockwell –
8. Article in Jornal of aging Studies – September 2005
9. Article in The Benefits of Creating a Leadership Legacy by Site Staff – December 10, 2012
10. Article in 7 ways to build your legacy at work by Phyllis Weis Haserot – February 10, 2016
11. The blog in 5 ways to leave a great legacy by Joan Moran – December 7, 2017
12. Article in 5 Undeniable Reasons to Leave a Legacy by Jim Rohn – july 3, 2016
13. Article in 4 ways to leave a positive Legacy at Work by Heather R Younger, J.D., CCXP – December 2017