Category: Law

1: 
Describe times governments have committed crimes such as terrorism and genoc

1: 
Describe times governments have committed crimes such as terrorism and genocide. What was the alleged motivating factor for the crime(s) of terrorism and or genocide? Did the state face any punishment for its action? If so, what was the punishment?
2: Determine how a state actor may be held accountable for crimes. Are all states held accountable to the same standards? If a state is punished, how is that state held accountable?

Please note that the purpose of the essay is not to summarize what has already b

Please note that the purpose of the essay is not to summarize what has already been 
done, but to address a specific question to which there is not necessarily an answer. 
I have attached my plan with the bibliography approved by my professor but it is in french so even the sources are in french, so it is crucial to follow it. It is important to adhere to the sources already listed in the plan. Would you be able to write it english but to follow the 
plan i put and the sources i put even though they are in french?  
The actual essay: (FOLLOW THE PLAN I SENT YOU!!) 
It must include an overview of Canadian legislation on the subject. It should also rely on 
Canadian doctrine on the subject and finally present concrete examples of Canadian 
case law. After reviewing the current situation, a section on the major historical issues and then on the current challenges should be included. It would be interesting to make some 
brief comparisons with other countries where the law is different (this part should be brief as the project should focus on Canada). Finally, at the very end, I would like to include a 
section presenting a personal opinion on the subject and a perspective for the future. 
The format of the sources must comply with the McGill Guide. Here is the link to the manual to follow for the format: [McGill Guide](https://nextcanada.westlaw.com/Browse/Accueil/ManuelcanadiendelarfrencejuridiqueGuideMcGill/CanadianGuidetoUniformLegalCitation10thEdition?guid=If3b9e53af51d511fe0440021280d79ee&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&VR=3.0&RS=cblt1.0).
Please let me know if you are able to open it. Thank you.

Read the case, Aguinda v. Texaco, Inc. (2002) 303 F.3d 470 https://www.casemine.

Read the case, Aguinda v. Texaco, Inc. (2002) 303 F.3d 470 https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914b89badd7b04934786302
In a 3-5 page paper,
·         Explain the facts of the case
·         Identify the legal issues
·         Explain the court’s rationale for their ruling, and
·         Explain whether you agree or disagree with the result
The final two sections should be the core of your submission and include analysis along with at least two scholarly sources to justify your agreement or disagreement with the result. Use 12-point font.  

Write a paragraph about recommending different changes in english criminal law t

Write a paragraph about recommending different changes in english criminal law that would make Maria’s case fairer. Use 3 different sources and try to find analytics and put it in MLA format. 

Please answer the following essay question:
“Rishi Sunak’s recent pledge to revi

Please answer the following essay question:
“Rishi Sunak’s recent pledge to review how homicide offences are categorised is to be welcomed. The offences of murder and manslaughter in England and Wales lack a rational structure that properly reflects degrees of fault. As a result the law is neither clear nor is it comprehensible to the general public.”
Discuss with reference to the homicide offences that you have studied on the module, drawing on relevant case law and academic commentary.
Please use OSCOLA when referencing please also add bibliography thank you
Please refer to the files attached to the order
Please also use UK English and not American thank you

. In this case, after agreeing to hear the case (known as granting certiorari) t

. In this case, after agreeing to hear the case (known as granting certiorari) the United States Supreme Court held that detectives interrogating Thompkins did not violate Thompkins’ Miranda rights in obtaining his confession.
Read the case of Berghuis v. Thompkins. You may also find it helpful to listen to the oral arguments the lawyers made before the United States Supreme Court.
Prepare an argument for:
If your last name begins with A through M you must argue in favor of the majority’s decision in the case. (Finding that the detectives did not violate Thompkins’ Miranda rights).
If your last name begins with N through Z you must argue against the majority’s decision and in favor of the dissent. The dissent argued that Thompkins’ confession was illegally obtained in violation of his Miranda rights.
Remember to support your required position with what you have learned from this week’s assigned reading about constitutional safeguards.

Draft an International Trademark Licensing Agreement. 
See the example provided

Draft an International Trademark Licensing Agreement. 
See the example provided at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1419177/000141917711000018/exhibit10-12.htm
Be creative as to the following:
·         Identify the names of the parties
·         Identify the trademark that is to be licensed
·         Identify the contract provisions you would include
·         Use 12-point font.  Contract can be 3-5 pages in length

critically discuss the following statement:
“The preventive function of governme

critically discuss the following statement:
“The preventive function of government..is far more liable to be abused to the prejudice of liberty, than the punitory function for there is hardly any part of the legitimate freedom of action of a human being that would not admit of being represented, and fairly too, as increasing the facilities for some form of delinquency” (John Stuart Mill, On Liberty,
1859)
Please use references from here:
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/goldsmiths/detail.action?docID=5777724
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.gold.idm.oclc.org/lib/goldsmiths/detail.action?docID=4857881
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.gold.idm.oclc.org/lib/goldsmiths/detail.action?docID=4890832
English Legal System: The Fundamentals, 5th Ed.
Please use OSCOLA when referencing and also add bibliography please

Scenario: A new musical talent has been discovered — his name is Dustin Kieber

Scenario: A new musical talent has been discovered — his name is Dustin Kieber and he is a 15-year-old singer/musician from Germany. All the teenage girls love Dustin and he is quickly becoming a mega-star. Dustin has been approached by a record label and an agent to represent him, and he needs the help of an attorney to make good decisions. So he comes to you.
Main Response (250 words minimum): Discuss what contractual detail Dustin needs to be mindful of as he enters into negotiations with his new label and agent. Among other things, be sure to address the following elements:
What are the required elements of any contract?
What kinds of contracts have to be in writing in order to be valid? Is this contract one of those kinds?
What are the means of offer and acceptance?
What consideration must be present?
What capacity issues are present given that Dustin is a minor?
What jurisdictional issues are present given that Dustin is from Germany?
What kinds of concerns are there around contract term or duration?
How kinds of concerns are there around contract termination (how and by whom and when)?
What should constitute a breach of contract?
What damages should be available to the non-breaching party?
What do you think is the single most important thing Dustin should care about in his contract negotiations and why?

The LLM Dissertation mainly comprises of the following points:
1. Legal analysis

The LLM Dissertation mainly comprises of the following points:
1. Legal analysis- critical evaluation of law, context in which that law operates, not much      political arguments, relevant legal framework.
2. Substantiate whatever position you take: lawful or unlawful- either be pro or against the topic.
3. No spelling mistakes, plain english.
4. Referencing/Citation style- Oscola.
5. Word count- 5000 words excluding references
6. Resources- Westlaw 
7. legal statutory interpretations, instruments, articles, textbooks, practioner texts, cases,       law commission publishes issues on topics. Civil liberty organizations have a keen interest in this topic and would have published some material. Peer reviewed journals, reports by     reputable charities, privacy international. 
8. No blog usage–inappropriate
Please ask if anything is unclear.