Background You are a new assistant district attorney. The county has just experi

Background You are a new assistant district attorney. The county has just experi

Background You are a new assistant district attorney. The county has just experienced a major crime spree. Adam, Ben, Cam, and Don have been arrested. Your boss asks you to draft a memorandum discussing what crimes should be considered to have been committed by Adan, Ben, Cam, and Don, any defenses that might be raised, and whether those defenses might be successful. The purpose of this memorandum is to fully inform your boss of the possible criminal charges that might be brought and any defenses in this case; if, from the facts, you are unsure if a particular crime was committed, then you may explain why. You must state the elements of the offenses (the law) and how the facts tend to show that the elements were met. You should also address any possible defenses suggested by the facts and whether those defenses would be successful at trial. Instructions: • Identify any crimes Adam, Ben, Cam, and Don may have committed (if any). You should address each person individually. Address all four, even if some did not commit a crime (all four have been arrested, so your boss needs to know about all four). Do not address any crimes committed by Evan or Vic, who are not in custody. • State the law defining each crime (from the textbook). • Explain how the facts demonstrate each portion of the definition or element of each crime. • Explain any defenses Adam, Ben, Cam, and Don may have to each crime you identify, if any. • If you are unsure of a particular crime or defense, discuss them and explain why you are unsure. • The memorandum should be in narrative form; do not use bullet points or lists. • Identify if Adam, Ben, Cam, or Don are accomplices or accessories to any crimes the others committed. You do not need to quote or restate the entire factual scenario in your memorandum; of course, you will refer to various facts throughout your discussion. The M’Naughten rule applies in this jurisdiction. Also, conspirators are not liable for the crimes of co-conspirators. Do not discuss any possible crimes in relation to Evan’s death or whether Vic committed any crimes. The purpose of this assignment is to test your understanding of the legal issues revealed in the facts. Do not address issues relating to prosecution strategy, investigation tactics, plea bargaining, obtaining evidence, reliability of witnesses, possible punishment, sentencing options, or trial tactics. You should instead discuss whether the facts show that crimes occurred or legal defenses exist – this is what your boss wants to know. Factual Background An investigation revealed the following facts, which are undisputed: Adam, Ben, Cam, Don, Evan, and Vic are friends. One day, Evan’s body is found in a lake. Adam suffers from various mental disorders. He hears voices that tell him to do things and believes that he can talk to the dead with his wristwatch. Adam believes that Evan is talking to him from beyond the grave (through his wristwatch) and telling Adam that Vic drowned Evan in the lake (Vic had nothing to do with Evan’s death). Adam plans to shoot and kill Vic. He has a gun, but his neighbor borrowed it. Adam goes over to his neighbor’s house one night to get the gun, but the neighbor is gone. Adam has permission to go into his neighbor’s house at any time, even when his neighbor is not home, but the door is locked. Adam breaks the lock to get inside; he knows how to fix the lock, however, because he has done this before. Adam can’t find his gun, so he decides to leave. On the way out, Adam sees his neighbor’s wristwatch on the table. The voices tell him to take it, and he puts the wristwatch in his pocket. He fixes the lock, leaves, and goes to sell the wristwatch at a pawn shop. The wristwatch is not really worth any money and does not talk, so Adam later throws it in the trash. He later finds his gun on his back porch — his neighbor had previously returned it. Ben also believes that Vic killed Evan. He wants to hire someone to kill Vic, but he has no money (he’s too scared of Vic to try to kill Vic himself). He decides to rob someone to get the money. He hides in a dark alley with a gun and waits for someone to walk by. Ben is a habitual drunkard and real nervous, so he drinks a 12-pack of beer. Gloria is walking home through the alley. Ben points the gun at her, hits her on the head, and demands her money. Gloria fumbles in her purse for a minute and then gives him $750. As he is taking the money, Ben, who is very drunk, accidentally shoots Gloria, severely wounding her, but not killing her. He puts Gloria in his pickup and drives to a remote location to dump her body. Thinking she is dead, he decides to have sex with her corpse. After he finishes, Gloria revives. Ben panics and runs away; Gloria later dies of her gunshot wound. Adam, Ben, and Cam meet the next morning for coffee. They begin discussing Evan’s death. They all believe that Vic killed him. They begin to discuss whether someone should kill Vic in retaliation. Cam decides that he wants no part of this and leaves the meeting. Adam and Ben decide to kill Vic without Cam’s help. Ben gives Adam money to buy a fast getaway car. Adam uses the money for a down payment on a used Mustang convertible that afternoon. That night, Adam asks Don to drive him to Vic’s property where Vic lives in a trailer. Don, who is 16 years old and loves convertibles, agrees. Don drives Adam there in the car Adam bought with Gloria’s money. Ben did not come. When Adam gets out of the car, Don becomes scared and drives away, leaving Adam. Don drives to the nearest gas station and calls the police. Adam crawls under a fence and walks to Vic’s trailer. He thinks he hears Evan’s voice in his head telling him that he is invisible and that he will receive a great reward if he kills Vic. Adam kicks open the door and walks into the trailer. Vic pulls out a gun and shoots at Adam, missing him. Adam again thinks he hears Evan’s voice in his head telling him to kill Vic. The voice is so loud that he can barely hear Vic’s gun still shooting at him or resist the voice’s influence. Adam then shoots Vic, killing him. Adam thinks about taking Vic’s expensive Rolex watch, but the voice tells him not to. He drops the gun and leaves. Cam had become concerned about his conversation with Adam and Ben that morning. He drove over to Vic’s place to see if Adam and Ben were up to trouble. Cam hears the gunshots and finds Adam crawling out from under the fence with the gun. There are blood spots on his clothes, and Adam tells Cam that he killed Vic. Cam drives Adam to Cam’s remote hunting cabin in the woods, where Adam stayed for several weeks before the police found him.

eBook: Prenkert, J. D., Barnes, A. J., Perry, J. E., Haugh, T., & Stemler, A. (

eBook:
Prenkert, J. D., Barnes, A. J., Perry, J. E., Haugh, T., & Stemler, A. (

eBook:
Prenkert, J. D., Barnes, A. J., Perry, J. E., Haugh, T., & Stemler, A. (2022). Business law: The ethical, global, and e-commerce environment (18th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
• Chapter 14: Capacity to Contract
Articles, Websites, and Videos:
At this link you can read an example of jury instructions regarding consideration that a judge would use to instruct a jury considering a contract claim.
This video explains “capacity to contract.”
Watch Video
Mental Capacity to Contract
Duration: 2:02
User: The Business Professor – Added: 6/12/14
Overview: In this unit, we have been examining under what grounds a contract may be rescinded or declared void and voidable. This assignment asks you to review a hypothetical business situation and conduct an analysis.
Instructions: Consider the following hypothetical: Ed contracted with Becky to build a house. Immediately prior to that meeting, Becky was so nervous that she drank an entire bottle of champagne and she does not remember all of the details of the meeting. Shortly before the closing, Ed met with Becky, accused her of fraud and threated to prevent the contract from going to closing. Ed’s associate, a former stunt double for Dwayne “the Rock” Johnson, stood outside the door for two hours to prevent Becky from leaving. Ed gave Becky the choice of signing a new contract promising him more money for the build or going to court. Becky signed the agreement but now has sought legal advice.
• Imagine that you are Becky’s attorney. What would you tell her about whether she can rescind the contract? (Big Hint: Capacity to Contract, Duress and Undue Influence)
Requirements:
• Include one resource, in addition to the textbook. o Use APA format for non-legal sources such as the textbook. Use Bluebook citation format for any legal citations.
• Submit a Word document.
• Maximum two pages in length, excluding the Reference page.

Please read the hypothetical below and then answer each question in bold. Take

Please read the hypothetical below and then answer each question in bold. Take

Please read the hypothetical below and then answer each question in bold. Take time to analyze the issues, and to organize your answer to each question. If you find it necessary to make an assumption of fact, please state what those assumptions are and continue with your answer. Your answer will be graded primarily on the quality of your legal reasoning and analysis in applying legal principles to the facts. You are expected to identify relevant issues, state relevant rules that govern those issues, apply and analyze the rules to the relevant facts in the test question, and reach a legal conclusion that resolves the issues presented in the question. This instruction means use IRAC form (Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion) when writing your answers. Consider the following format for each IRAC answer:
• Issue: (you can use the call of the question here)
• Rule: (state the legal principle that applies to the issue)
• Analysis: (start with “Here,” use language of the legal principle, then use the word “because” followed by specific facts)
• Conclusion: (in one sentence conclude, “Therefore. . .”)
PLEASE USE UP TWO FOUR DIFFERENT ELEMENTS AND BE VERY DETAILED.

im applying for phd program in RMIT university , therefore the university provid

im applying for phd program in RMIT university , therefore the university provid

im applying for phd program in RMIT university , therefore the university provided a project research as a part of the phd application . I picked this topic, If you want more information about the topic and the instructors just visit this link: https://www.rmit.edu.au/research/research-degrees/find-a-project?_ga=2.178996708.1323155105.1701378230-1216943210.1701378230
<
Distributed Ledger Technologies, Law, and Governance: Opportunities and Challenges
<
Distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) are a set of digital technologies developing open, peer-to-peer, distributed ledgers to record transactions between multiple parties in a verifiable and tamper resistant way. As a result, DLTs enable systems where people, Artificial Intelligence agents, or Internet of Things objects can interact in a trusted and virtually frictionless network.
<
A key component of DLTs are distributed consensus mechanisms that exclusively rely on the nodes of the network to validate any incoming transactions (e.g. currency transfers, votes, smart contracts, etc.). As there is no need of third trusted parties to validate such transactions, DLTs are expected to disrupt a number of industries and domains: finance and capital markets, logistics and supply chains, utilities and consumer products, and government and the public sector, among others.
<
This research program aims at studying the impact of different forms of DLTs (such as the open platforms Blockchain and Ethereum) on law and governance. More specifically, it proposes to investigate three main areas: legal transactions (e.g. property and IP rights), voting, and governance of big data.
<
Research question/s
<
The three main research questions are:
<
•How DLTs can be used to provide users with greater access and control over the data they create?
<
•Do DLTs enable more efficient and tamper-proof online voting mechanisms?
<
•Can DLTs provide a more secure and trusted system for legal transactions such as electronic land transfers or IP rights?
<
<
College: Business and Law
<
<
School: Graduate School of Business and Law
<
<
Discipline: Law
<
<
Program Code: DR206
<
<
Campus: Melbourne City
<
<
Project/Team Leader: Marta Poblet, Christopher Berg, Aaron Lane
<
<
Sustainable Development Goal(s):
<
<
Funded Project:
<
<
Closing Date:
<
<
Enabling Capability Platform: The project will RMIT ECPs capabilities on value-based healthcare and develop interdisciplinary RMIT collaboration to examine all facets of VBPD. Its innovative offering addresses industry needs and provides the basis for ongoing work in this area. In particular, this research is aligned with the GBI ECP and GSBL Incubator (Innovation) by 1) deepening RMIT’s understanding of innovative business practices and approaches when it comes to VBPD; 2) building collaboration with public and private sector partners to generate researchdriven change and impact in value-driven innovation in healthcare internationally and create opportunities for RMIT University in health 4.0.
<
<
FoR Code(s):

NO CHAT GPT and no wordiness: Some commentators claim that many AI and automate

NO CHAT GPT and no wordiness:
Some commentators claim that many AI and automate

NO CHAT GPT and no wordiness:
Some commentators claim that many AI and automated decision-making systems raise significant discrimination harms that are not sufficiently addressed by the current US patchwork of privacy laws, technical safeguards, and social norms.
If you agree, how would you strengthen or change the current patchwork to mitigate those harms? If you disagree, why do you think that current law adequately addresses those harms? Explain your thinking, with tangible examples of particular discrimination harms (as described in the Citron-Solove privacy harm taxonomy) that are or are not addressed by existing law.
Directions: ONLY USE Citron-Solove article and the powerpoint I provide you. You can use these articles I provide as well if you have time. Do not use CHAT GPT at all and do not just randomly use google unless you cover it up.
Other source article titles:
More bad news for Big Tech: Lina Khan’s a privacy hawk, too
Prepared Remarks of Commissioner Noah Joshua Phillips, How (Not) to Regulate Technology, The Hudson Institute, 10/6/2022 (skim pages 1-3, read pages 5 through the end of the first paragraph on page 8)
Why the FTC should proceed with a privacy rulemaking
Fact Sheet on the FTC’s Commercial Surveillance and Data Security Rulemaking (skim)
The FTC’s Privacy Rulemaking: Broad and Far-Reaching, but Unlikely to Lead to a Rule Anytime Soon
RECORD SET: ASSESSING POINTS OF EMPHASIS FROM PUBLIC INPUT ON THE FTC’S PRIVACY RULEMAKING (Future of Privacy Forum blog)
Excerpts from the Federal Trade Commission’s Congressional testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, pg 25 (starting at section B) through 31
JOINT STATEMENT ON ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND BIAS IN AUTOMATED SYSTEMS
The FTC’s biggest AI enforcement tool? Forcing companies to delete their algorithms
https://linc.cnil.fr/1970-2021-data-protection-spreads-world
https://edpb.europa.eu/sme-data-protection-guide/data-protection-basics_en
Guidance Note: Legal Bases for Processing Personal Data, DPC -https://www.dataprotection.ie/sites/default/files/uploads/2020-04/Guidance%20on%20Legal%20Bases.pdf
Press Release: The Government Surveillance Reform Act Will Establish New Safeguards for Government Surveillance and Accountability for Abuses; Reauthorize and Reform FISA Section 702; Establish Protections for Americans Whose Private Information is Collected Under Other Intelligence Authorities; and Modernize Outdated Surveillance Laws – https://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/wyden-lee-davidson-and-lofgren-introduce-bipartisan-legislation-to-reauthorize-and-reform-key-surveillance-law-secure-protections-for-americans-rights
The attached consolidated readings –
MOSTLY USE POWERPOINTS AND THE ONE SOLOVE-CITRON ARTICLE I HAVE PROVIDED.

This is an In House Counsel Law Class Final Assignment. The assignment instructi

This is an In House Counsel Law Class Final Assignment. The assignment instructi

This is an In House Counsel Law Class Final Assignment. The assignment instructions are attached.
There are 3 assignments in total and all of them must be in the same word document. Minimum pages required is 15 pages and maximum is 20 pages (not including the cover page).
The memos (memorandums) will likely be 2-3 pages each and the letters 3-5 pages each. (you will see what I mean in the assignment instructions pdf).
Please cite using ALWD or Bluebook.
***IMPORTANT (from my professor)
The California case that will help you in the Long Beach Port fact pattern is: Oakland v. Schenk decided in 1925.