I need a Research Paper written on the Negations for the Lausanne Treaty took be
I need a Research Paper written on the Negations for the Lausanne Treaty took between Turkey and Allied Associated Powers (including France, Britain, Greece etc.). For the course of paper, the parties will be Turkey and all the remaining countries will be under the Allied Associated Powers. The paper needs to analyze international negotiation strategies and tactics used by Turkey in the international Lausanne Treaty negotiations. The reasoning of why the Lausanne Treaty is considered to be a noteworthy international negotiation should be emphasized. The paper should explain each party’s aims and actions and analyze how they fit into applicable theories of international negotiations. It should include various negotiation styles and strategies used by Turkey and also the opposing party, how the power differences between parties were used and effected the course of the negotiation? It should also indicate whether the specifics tactics employed by Turkey were effective (or not), and how and why (or why not). The paper should suggest any alternative negotiation strategies and tactics that could have produced better results for Turkey, by offering the reasonings.
Things to be included in the course of paper:
1. Introduction
2. Background – background information about the negotiation, what was the reason such negotiation was made, what was the aim etc.
3. Interests of the Parties
– Who are the parties?
– What are the political, economic, security interests of the
Parties?
– Impact of environment, being in post-world war II era, how
did it effect parties interest and the negotiations.
4. Bargaining Process
– What are the issues negotiated?
– Positions of the parties, their bargaining styles, how was
the negotiation environment (friendly, cooperative, or soft
or hard/hostile)
– Impact of different culture in the negotiation
5. Explanation of the Negotiations through Negotiation Theories
– What was the BATNA (best available alternative to
negotiated agreement) of Each Party , and the WATNA
(worse available alternative to the negotiated agreement)
of Parties? Did Turkey reached a negotiation that was better
than its BATNA therefore was Turkey successful?
– Effective Negotiation Strategies/Theories used by Turkey,
how and why were they effective.
– Ineffective Negotiation Strategies/Theories used by
Turkey, how and why they were ineffective.
6. Recommendations – Suggestions about alternative negotiation strategies and tactics that could have been used by Turkey that might have produced better results for Turkey.
7. Conclusion
EXTRA NOTES:
Citations should be done according to “BLUEBOOK”, follow bluebook citations as in footnotes.
Some examples to negotiation strategies that can be analyzed:
– Which party had a stronger bargaining position, how did
unbalanced power dynamics between parties effected the
negotiation, how did Turkey managed with this?
– Was strategies like positional bargaining, principle
negotion used by any of the
Resources That Need to be Used:
1. The main sources for the paper should be by these books, and the paper should analyze how the Lausanne Negotiations implemented the negotiation strategies explained in these resource, were they effective in using them, what was the ineffective aspects:
• Jeanne M. Brett, Negotiating Globally: How to Negotiate Deals, Resolve Disputes, and Make Decisions Across Cultural Boundaries (Third Edition) (Jossey-Bass Business & Management 2014) (“Negotiating Globally”).
• Roger W. Fisher, William Ury, & Bruce Patton, Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (Penguin, 3rd ed., 2011) (“Getting to Yes”).
2. Other resources / articles on Lausanne Treaty Negotiations
Citation: