Deliverables:Written Report (800-1000 words): Your report should cover the follo

Deliverables:Written Report (800-1000 words): Your report should cover the follo

Deliverables:Written Report (800-1000 words): Your report should cover the following aspects based on the lessons covered in the module:Introduction: Briefly define criminal profiling and its historical evolution.
Theoretical Framework: Discuss the psychological theories behind criminal profiling and how these theories aid in understanding criminal behavior.
Profiling Techniques and Methodologies: Describe various profiling techniques and methodologies, including crime scene analysis, victimology, and geographical profiling. Highlight the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning in profiling.
Case Study Analysis: Select one landmark case where criminal profiling played a key role. Analyze the profile developed, the outcome, and what this case illustrates about the effectiveness of criminal profiling.
Critical Evaluation: Discuss the practical applications, ethical considerations, and limitations of criminal profiling. Reflect on potential biases and how they can impact the profiling process.
Presentation (Optional): Prepare a presentation summarizing your findings and analyses from the written report. Focus on the case study analysis and your critical evaluation of criminal profiling.
Grading Rubric:CriterionExcellent (A) 25 pointsGood (B) 20 pointsSatisfactory (C) 15 pointsNeeds Improvement (D/F) 10 points
IntroductionProvides a clear, concise, and comprehensive definition and history of criminal profiling.Provides a satisfactory definition and brief history with minor omissions.Provides a basic definition and mentions historical aspects but lacks depth.Definition or history is either missing or inadequately explained.
Theoretical FrameworkThoroughly discusses psychological theories with detailed examples of their application in profiling.Discusses psychological theories with examples but lacks depth in application.Mentions psychological theories but with minimal or no application examples.Fails to adequately discuss psychological theories or lacks examples.
Profiling Techniques and MethodologiesDetailed exploration of various techniques and methodologies, with clear explanations of inductive vs. deductive reasoning.Adequately describes techniques and methodologies but lacks detail on reasoning types.Provides a basic description of techniques with superficial mention of reasoning types.Techniques and methodologies are poorly explained or missing.
Case Study AnalysisProvides an in-depth analysis of a landmark case, with insights into the profiling process and outcome.Provides a general analysis of a case with some insight into profiling but lacks depth.Mentions a case with limited analysis or insight into the profiling process.Case study is either inadequately analyzed or not included.
Critical EvaluationOffers a comprehensive evaluation of applications, ethical considerations, and limitations with a thoughtful reflection on biases.Provides a good evaluation with some reflection on ethical considerations and biases but could be deeper.Offers a basic evaluation with minimal reflection on ethical considerations and biases.Lacks a critical evaluation or fails to address ethical considerations and limitations.
Total Points: 100
Submission Guidelines:
Submit your written report as a PDF document through the course portal.
Ensure your report follows academic integrity guidelines, citing all sources appropriately.
The optional presentation, if chosen to be completed, should be submitted as a PowerPoint file or similar format.

Your team is to analyze the case presented. Instead of developing a written pape

Your team is to analyze the case presented. Instead of developing a written pape

Your team is to analyze the case presented. Instead of developing a written paper, your team is to develop a presentation covering all of the elements that would have been covered in a research paper. Sources must be properly cited, and at least two sources other than the textbook must be used to include outside court cases. The final slide of your presentation should list your references in APA format.
Case Scenario
Lynette Hines is employed by Irvin Industries. She recently became a Seven Day Adventist and has informed her employer that she can no longer work on Saturday. Irvin Industries makes seat cushions for airplanes and is a relatively small operation. While Saturday is not a regular workday, frequently employees are required to work on Saturday and they are informed of this condition of employment during the hiring process. Lynette is told by her supervisor that if the plant is operating on a Saturday, she will have to be there unless she is sick. He explained to Lynette that he had no one to do her job and her absence would slow down production. The following Saturday, Lynette failed to report to work and she was fired. She filed a claim for religious discrimination under Title VII.
A detailed, in-depth analysis with well-documented management tips should be developed for each paper. At least four outside sources should be cited for each paper, but additional sources are recommended. The following rubric will be used for evaluation: Analysis = 40%; Management Tips = 20%; Writing = 15%; Formatting/APA = 15%; References = 10%. Please review the announcements for further guidance on developing these research papers. At least one relevant legal case not found in the textbook must be used as a reference and properly cited. If artificial intelligence is used to write parts or all of the submission, it will be considered plagiarism.
Use PowerPoint
See draft attached

The chances that you will face ethical dilemmas in the workplace are almost cert

The chances that you will face ethical dilemmas in the workplace are almost cert

The chances that you will face ethical dilemmas in the workplace are almost certain. This is true for defense attorneys and prosecutors too. It’s important to practice proper discretion. How will you analyze and solve the ethical dilemmas you face? Read and reflect on the Ethical Dilemmas exploration activities each week to help you complete this activity. Assume you are a law student studying a case in which a serial killer has been accused of committing five murders of female students at a university in a major city. You have been asked to summarize ethical violations that may be committed by either a prosecutor or defense attorney engaged in this trial. Write a 700- to 1,050-word brief describing the ethical issues for prosecutors and defense attorneys. Answer the following: What types of ethical violations and punishments have been associated with prosecutors and defense attorneys? What are the explanations for prosecutorial misconduct? Provide real-world examples of prosecutorial misconduct. The Jodi Arias case is a great example of a prosecutor stretching the limits of what is proper conduct and what is a clear violation. What role might discriminatory practice based on race, ethnicity, religion or sex play in such misconduct? Provide real-world examples. Should attorneys be punished more or less than the standard criminal defendants? Explain your answer. Cite a minimum of 2 references. Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.

DO NOT USE AI. Prepare IRAC briefs for the following 3 cases found in your read

DO NOT USE AI.
Prepare IRAC briefs for the following 3 cases found in your read

DO NOT USE AI.
Prepare IRAC briefs for the following 3 cases found in your reading, and put all the briefs in one pdf please.
a. Gregory v. Johnson (pg 538)
b. McClung v. Delta Square LP (pg 540)
c. Tieu v. Morgan (ch 4, pg 68).
The first two readings are at the end of the premises reading and the last one is in the adverse possession reading.

Requirement: You need to write 2-pages reaction paper on one case or set of case

Requirement:
You need to write 2-pages reaction paper on one case or set of case

Requirement:
You need to write 2-pages reaction paper on one case or set of cases that I will provide to you. You must follow the details of the requirements that will be provided to you.
Note: I will provide the cases and the details of the requirement.

In this week’s discussion, you will define and provide an example of probable ca

In this week’s discussion, you will define and provide an example of probable ca

In this week’s discussion, you will define and provide an example of probable cause. Also, you will type and answer the four questions below. Do not answer those questions in paragraph form. Provide complete answers.
What is probable cause, and why is it essential in the Criminal Justice System?
Please explain in detail the Donald Trump 2020 election case and how significant probable cause is to it.
If probable cause exists in the Donald Trump case, could he be held accountable and arrested for his crime, explained?
Lastly, the Pledge of Allegiance was written as a form of loyalty to the United States. It states, “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” Is it accurate to say that in the United States, justice is for all, explained, and how would probable cause relates with justice for all ?

Describe the egalitarian features of American society noted by its European obse

Describe the egalitarian features of American society noted by its European obse

Describe the egalitarian features of American society noted by its European observers. In what ways did Jefferson’s political use of the concept of equality overlap with the kind of social equality these European observers noted, or in what ways did his use of equality differ from or add to theirs? How are these 18th century views of equality consistent or inconsistent with common views of that term today?
Use the sources below: APA 7 Format. Must use 3 sources

What is an American


PDF attached by Fischer.
Read: Fischer: 174 – 180
Read: Fischer: 382 – 390
Read: Fischer: 455 – 467
Read: Fischer: 573 – 577.

Read and answer the attached questions thoroughly referencing reading materials.

Read and answer the attached questions thoroughly referencing reading materials.

Read and answer the attached questions thoroughly referencing reading materials.
Reviewability, pg. 943-948, 960-970, 989-997
Johnson v. Robison (1974)
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe (1971)
Heckler v. Chaney (1985)
The Timing of Judicial Review, pg. 1003-1004, 1009-1011, 1018-1023, 1049-1064
Bennett v. Spear (1997)
Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner (1967)
McKart v. U.S. (1969)
McCarthy v. Madigan (1992)
Standing to Obtain Judicial Review, pg. 1078-1082, 1092-1098, 1138-1140
Spokeo v. Robins (2016)