“Central to the analysis, as the Directive and the (Data Protection Act 1988 Act

“Central to the analysis, as the Directive and the (Data Protection Act 1988 Act

“Central to the analysis, as the Directive and the (Data Protection Act 1988 Act) make clear, is the concept of notification of the purpose to the data subject. There is no dispute here but that the security purpose, being the only specified purpose, was clearly identified in both the OLHCS CCTV policy and the notices beside the cameras themselves. Section 2D of the Act, cited above, makes clear that personal data shall not be treated as processed fairly unless the data subject is made aware, at or before the time when the data is obtained, of the purpose for which the data are intended to be processed. (…) It seems to me that it could not reasonably be said in the present case that Mr. Doolin had either been notified that the CCTV could be used for disciplinary purposes or that there was any basis upon which he ought reasonably to have expected such use. It seems to me the contrary is much more likely to be the case
Insofar, therefore, as it may be correct to say that the High Court overlooked the compatibility analysis, in my judgment it is clear in the present case that Mr. Doolin’s data were indeed used for a purpose other than, and incompatible with, the specified purpose. It follows therefore that such use was unlawful.” (Noonan J.)
The Data Protection Commissioner v. Cormac Doolin [2022] IECA 117 at paras. 92-94
Critically discuss the above statement in the context Irish Employment Law. Do you agree/disagree or partially agree/partially disagree the view of Noonan J. in this case. Please refer to at least one case (the case you will refer to will be López Ribalda and Others v Spain case please) AND at least one academic article to support your answer.
Please ensure that you furnish a short bibliography for this discussion and that your work is properly referenced and footnoted in accordance with Osceola referencing.
I HAVE PROVIDED ALL THE INFORMATION REGARDING THE DOOLAN CASE AND LOPEZ CASE AND DATA PROTECTION ACT IN THE FILES SECTION. REFER TO THIS WHEN ANSWERING QUESTION. When looking for academic article look on ‘Oxford Academic’ website in relation to data protection in the workplace in Ireland. Also refer to one of these books in relation to the question please: the Daly & Doherty, Principles of Irish Employment Law (2010)
Alastair Purdy, Equality Law in the Workplace (2015) (available on Bloomsbury Professional)
 Bolger, Bruton, Kimber Employment Equality Law, Round Hall, 2nd
ed. 2022 (on westlaw.ie).
Layout:
Introduction: mention bit on data act, facts of Doolan case, 2d of the act, what happened in high court
(The intro should not be long)
Discussion: Noonan J.’s comment, put in Lopez case, book, one academic article. REMEMBER: this all has to be in relation to the statement made. I will be asking the writer to complete it again if it is not up to the standard I wish.
REFER TO THE QUESTION.

Develop a hypothetical scenario in which you are a law enforcement officer engag

Develop a hypothetical scenario in which you are a law enforcement officer engag

Develop a hypothetical scenario in which you are a law enforcement officer engaging in police activities. In your scenario, you must include different components involving probable cause, search and seizure, identification, and use of force. After the scenario, outline the handling of each of the issues and the legal ramifications. Critically examine the postings of your peers and provide at least two (2) substantive replies. You have been hired as the defense attorney for the defendant in the scenario. Highlight your legal case and strategies.

The instruction sheet is attached with information about the research topic in r

The instruction sheet is attached with information about the research topic in r

The instruction sheet is attached with information about the research topic in red. An example of an Annotated Bibliography is also attached. Read the article attached and answer the questions below in 275 words. The purpose of this source is to show how the ABA has not properly managed non-JD law school programs, therefore it is better for State Bar Associations to accredit law schools.
Annotate each source with a summary of 275 words.
1. State the central thesis or research question of the source being cited.
2. Explain how the source’s author(s) support their thesis or research question.
3. Evaluate the relevance or applicability of the source to your specific concerns.

Explain the meaning of the following: Athe principle that consideration must be

Explain the meaning of the following:
Athe principle that consideration must be

Explain the meaning of the following:
Athe principle that consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate
Bthe principle that consideration may be executed or executory, but must not be past.

Darin is experiencing personal financial problems. The amount of income he recei

Darin is experiencing personal financial problems. The amount of income he recei

Darin is experiencing personal financial problems. The amount of income he receives from his corporation is barely sufficient to cover his living expenses, the payments due on his mortgage, various credit-card debts, and some loans that he took out to pay for his son’s college tuition. He would like to file for Chapter 7 liquidation just to be rid of the debts entirely, but he knows that he could probably pay them off over a four-year period if he really budgeted and used every cent available to pay his creditors. Darin decides to file for bankruptcy relief under Chapter 7. Are all of Darin’s debts dischargeable under Chapter 7, including the debts incurred for his son’s education? Given the fact that Darin could foreseeably pay off his debts over a four-year period, will the court allow Darin to obtain relief under Chapter 7? Why or why not?

CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of

CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of

CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterionIntroduction & identify the ethical dilemma or problem; states question; lists ethical principles in conflict
5 POINTS
5 to >4.5 ptsA
States question and ethical principles in conflict; identifies three or more conflicts; clearly stated
4.5 to >4.25 ptsB
States question and ethical principles in conflict/ identifies at least three conflicts; lacks clarity of content
4.25 to >3.75 ptsC
States question and ethical principles in conflict, identifies 1-2 conflicts
3.75 to >0 pts9.2 ptsA
States factual & additional resources; clearly stated and complete (all info presented)
9.2 to >8.4 ptsB
States factual & additional resources; lacks clarity and/or completeness
8.4 to >7.4 ptsC
States factual and additional sources
7.4 to >0 pts4.65 ptsA
States more than three options, clearly communicated
4.65 to >4.25 ptsB
States three options, clearly communicated
4.25 to >3.75 ptsC
States three options
3.75 to >0 pts18.6 ptsA
States all ethical principles and all pros/cons; clearly communicated
18.6 to >17.0 ptsB
States most ethical principles and all pros/cons; lacks complete clarity
17 to >15.0 ptsC
States most ethical principles and most pros/cons
15 to >0 pts9.2 ptsA
Determines choice, provides rationale, Hierarchy of Values, & pillow test, clearly communicated
9.2 to >8.4 ptsB
Determines choice, provides rationale, Hierarchy of Values & pillow test, lacks complete clarity
8.4 to >7.5 ptsC
Determines choice, lacks rationale or Hierarchy of Values or Pillow test
7.5 to >0 pts

The instruction sheet is attached with information about the research topic in r

The instruction sheet is attached with information about the research topic in r

The instruction sheet is attached with information about the research topic in red. An example of an Annotated Bibliography is also attached. Read the article attached and answer the questions below in 275 words. The purpose of this source is to show how there are other alternatives to the bar exam, and state bar associations can make the determination which format is best.
Annotate each source with a summary of 275 words. Answer the questions below.
1. State the central thesis or research question of the source being cited.
2. Explain how the source’s author(s) support their thesis or research question.
3. Evaluate the relevance or applicability of the source to your specific concerns.

According to the authors of the text, what is a Total Quality Framework? Accordi

According to the authors of the text, what is a Total Quality Framework? Accordi

According to the authors of the text, what is a Total Quality Framework? According to the readings for this unit what is a Conceptual Framework? In choosing your design, discuss the following components regarding your research project: Your target population, the description, size, and their demographic location Your secondary data collection, including the titles or sources of databases Your primary data collection that will be collected from your sample population or from metadata if you are conducting a meta-analysis study The measurement tools used to collect data from your sample population, or, if you are conducting a meta-analysis study, the method for sorting data from selected databases. The way in which your project succeeds at achieving (1) Credibility, (2) analyzability, (3) Transparency, and (4) Usefulness. The way in which the conceptual framework begins to display the underlying logic of the program; that is, the way the goals, resources, activities, and outcomes link together. 5–7 pages in length

What is your position on capital punishment? Assume that you are in favor of cap

What is your position on capital punishment? Assume that you are in favor of cap

What is your position on capital punishment? Assume that you are in favor of capital punishment, what do you think is the most humane manner of execution? Why? Conversely, assume that you are against capital punishment, discuss how you think these offenders should be sentenced? Critically examine the postings of your peers and provide at least two (2) substantive replies. Do you agree or disagree with your peers’ positions? Explain.

What key legal principles govern business case law, and how do they impact corpo

What key legal principles govern business case law, and how do they impact corpo

What key legal principles govern business case law, and how do they impact corporate practices? In what ways do precedents set by past court rulings shape current business operations and decision-making processes? How do regulations and statutes intersect with case law to establish a framework for business conduct and liability? Can you provide examples of landmark business case rulings that have significantly influenced corporate governance, contractual agreements, or intellectual property rights? Moreover, how do businesses navigate the complexities of case law to mitigate legal risks and ensure compliance? Are there common pitfalls or legal challenges companies encounter when interpreting and applying case law to their operations? Furthermore, how do international business transactions and global markets intersect with case law, considering differences in legal systems and jurisdictional issues? Finally, what strategies can businesses employ to stay abreast of evolving case law and anticipate potential legal implications for their operations in an ever-changing business landscape?