Case Scenario: Blue Mood Clothing, Inc., a company devoted to producing positive

Case Scenario: Blue Mood Clothing, Inc., a company devoted to producing positive

Case Scenario: Blue Mood Clothing, Inc., a company devoted to producing positive, mood-altering apparel and various other clothing items, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Colossal Corporation. Blue Mood Clothing’s most famous and best-selling product is the Breezer—a skin-tight shirt with an air ventilation system that allows the breeze to pass through the shirt. Colossal Corporation has uncovered an incident of theft at Blue Mood Clothing: approximately one month ago, over five thousand Breezers were stolen from Blue Mood Clothing’s Atlantic City, New Jersey, warehouse. Shortly after the theft was discovered, Colossal Corporation’s internal investigator, Bill, found an online advertisement for the sale of exactly five thousand Breezers, described as shirts with an “air ventilation system that allows a cooling breeze to pass through the shirt.” Bill called the contact on the website and set up a meeting with the seller, Nick Johnson. When Bill, under the guise of being an interested purchaser of the Breezers, inquired about Nick’s distributor, Nick did not hesitate to reveal that he purchased the Breezers from Juanita Winfrey, his long-time business associate. Bill inspected the five thousand Breezers, and confirmed they were indeed the same Breezer products that were stolen from the warehouse. He then requested a price quote from Nick and asked Nick to hold the products for him for seven days. Nick agreed. That same afternoon, before additional investigation, Bill sent an email intended solely to be sent to the vice president of Blue Mood Clothing, Inc., but he accidentally hit “reply all” to a previous message, and sent the email to every employee at Blue Mood Clothing, Inc., over two hundred people. The email stated, among other things, that “Nick Johnson was a thief and had an extensive criminal record in New Jersey. He stole the five thousand Breezers. I will continue my investigation tomorrow.” This statement was not true. Nick’s old friend from high school, who worked at Blue Mood Clothing, Inc., forwarded this message to Nick, who became worried about his business and reputation. Bill arranged a meeting with Juanita the very next day, during which he posed as an interested clothing buyer. He asked Juanita if she had any Breezer distributors she could recommend. Juanita said that she works directly with a Blue Mood Clothing sales agent named Alex Ridgefield, and that she recently purchased five thousand Breezers from him at a fair price. Juanita also said that Alex is quite interested in expanding his business with her, and would provide Bill with a great deal. After his meeting with Juanita, Bill checked the personnel records at Blue Mood Clothing and identified Alex Ridgefield as a low-level warehouse employee who has been with the company for over 20 years. Alex’s personnel record is spotless, with no prior personnel issues and no complaints. Alex is an at-will employee who is in charge of night security at the Atlantic City warehouse and has no history in sales. As a night security guard, Alex is responsible for protecting the warehouse from theft and is not permitted to sell products. After further investigation, Bill found company emails between Juanita and Alex in which Alex posed as a sales agent. Reading the emails, it became obvious that neither Juanita nor Nick knew that the five thousand Breezers were stolen, and that both bought the Breezers for fair-market value. Bill then collected video from all of Alex’s shifts and was able to locate a film of Alex packing the Breezers into his personal minivan and driving them out of the warehouse parking lot. Answer questions below, CRIMES: [] Alex = committed 2 crimes. [What are Alex’s crimes?] [if any, what reasonable legal Defense might Alex have that is based upon the facts presented?] [] Nick, Juanita, and Bill = committed no (0) crimes. [What facts indicate they did NOT commit any crimes, respectively?] INTENTIONAL TORTS: [] Alex = committed 2 intentional torts. [What are Alex’s torts?] [if any, what reasonable legal Defense might Alex have that is based upon the facts presented?] Please answer this in one (1) sentence or less. [] Nick = committed 1 intentional tort. [What are Nick’s torts?] [if any, what reasonable legal Defense might Nick have that is based upon the facts presented?] Please answer this in one (1) sentence or less. [] Juanita = committed 1 intentional tort. [What are Juanita’s torts?] [if any, what reasonable legal Defense might Juanita have that is based upon the facts presented?] Please answer this in one (1) sentence or less. [] Bill = committed 1 intentional tort. [What are Bill’s torts?] [if any, what reasonable legal Defense might Juanita have that is based upon the facts presented?] Please answer this in one (1) sentence or less. DAMAGES – Compensatory Damages and/or Punitive Damages: [] Colossal Corporation = which TYPE(s) of Damages (Compensatory and/or Punitive) is Colossal entitled to, if any, and from which respective PERSON(s)? Please answer this in one (1) sentence or less. [] Alex = which TYPE(s) of Damages (Compensatory and/or Punitive) is Alex entitled to, if any, and from which respective PERSON(s)? Please answer this in one (1) sentence or less. [] Nick = which TYPE(s) of Damages (Compensatory and/or Punitive) is Nick entitled to, if any, and from which respective PERSON(s)? Please answer this in one (1) sentence or less. [] Juanita = which TYPE(s) of Damages (Compensatory and/or Punitive) is Juanita entitled to, if any, and from which respective PERSON(s)? Please answer this in one (1) sentence or less. [] Bill = which TYPE(s) of Damages (Compensatory and/or Punitive) is Bill entitled to, if any, and from which respective PERSON(s)? Please answer this in one (1) sentence or less.

Posted in Law

I was denied a job promotion and I have to explain in details on what happen .

I was denied a job promotion and I have to explain in details on what happen .

I was denied a job promotion and I have to explain in details on what happen . I will have send you dates and people and give you step by step of the process on what happen. I will be taking this case to arbitration and I need my Narrative Paper written like I am in court explaining the details of what happen

Posted in Law

For this assessment, you’ll be focusing on forensic science and profiling. Under

For this assessment, you’ll be focusing on forensic science and profiling. Under

For this assessment, you’ll be focusing on forensic science and profiling. Understanding the intricacies of forensic science can be extremely helpful on the job, especially as it forms the basis for most criminal prosecutions and many civil litigation cases. As a criminal investigator in a police department, imagine that you are investigating a series of crimes that appear to be committed by the same person. You have been asked to consult on the creation of a criminal profile of the unknown suspect. You will need to research and analyze what is needed for the criminal profile and provide this information to the task force investigating the case. Select one of the two options: Select one of the case studies from “Serial murder in America: case studies of seven offenders” from the University Library. Find your own criminal profile to use. Keep in mind that it can be a local criminal profile and it does not have to be a serial murderer. Focus on finding a profile of a criminal that appears to be committing a series of crimes. Write a 1,200- to 1,400-word criminal profile analysis based on your chosen criminal profile or case study. Provide the following in the analysis: Define criminal profiling. Explain the purpose of a behavioral profile in criminal cases. Contrast inductive and deductive analysis. Explain the key factors. Discuss the reliability and validity of a profile. Analyze the forensic science used in this case. Provide an analysis of the criminal behavior or profile of the suspect. Evaluate and summarize the findings in the case. Submit your assignment.

Posted in Law

I’m researching any case that has been filed against Chancellor Senior Managemen

I’m researching any case that has been filed against Chancellor Senior Managemen

I’m researching any case that has been filed against Chancellor Senior Management, LTD (“Chancellor “). Chancellor owned, operated, managed and controlled four senior living communities in the State of West Virginia consisting of multiple assisted living facilities:
Greystone Senior Living Community of Beckley;
The Wyngate Senior Living Community of Parkersburg;
The Wyngate Senior Living Community of Barbersville; and
The Wyngate Senior Living Community of Weirton.
Kindly list all caselaw against chancellor and/or its facilities.

Posted in Law

Kevin Whalling, Chief Counsel for the Whalling Law Group, PLLC must appear in co

Kevin Whalling, Chief Counsel for the Whalling Law Group, PLLC must appear in co

Kevin Whalling, Chief Counsel for the Whalling Law Group, PLLC must appear in court on behalf of his client, Citizens for Corrections Reform, in an upcoming Judiciary Committee meeting in Congress. Citizens for Corrections Reform believes that people are not being sentenced appropriately for crime, and new ways of considering how to conform the public to the law should be considered. This is a highly politized issue. Mr. Whalling is weighing different options for his client on how to best approach Congress with their wishes. Mr. Whalling has asked you to prepare a memorandum of law concerning deterrence. Mr. Whalling needs you to discuss the following elements: Describe Specific Deterrence and give an example of how this works. Describe General Deterrence and give an example of how it works. Research Deterrence. Explain whether deterrence is working regarding both specific and general deterrence. Remember that this is an internal memorandum for Mr. Whalling; while his job is ultimately to support the client, Citizens for Corrections Reform, you can provide an objective analysis. Use the “Topic 6 Memorandum of Law” template to write a memorandum of 500 to 750 words. Follow the prompts within brackets in the template to complete the assignment. Be sure to cite three to five relevant scholarly sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at the GCU Library, government/legal websites, or those provided in Topic Materials. Note regarding citations: Because of the practical limitations of the course, you will not be learning legal citation work such as what would be found in the Bluebook, a citation tool utilized by attorneys. Instead, you will follow APA formatting for citation work. Remember to still cite in your legal memorandum (case law, etc.), and create a separate document for citations. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Posted in Law

The initial steps when a First Aider approaches an accident are very important.

The initial steps when a First Aider approaches an accident are very important.

The initial steps when a First Aider approaches an accident are very important. So important that they should be automatic. We’re going to work on thinking through those steps in this assignment! You will be doing a demonstration of these steps, either in video, or by creating a Powtoon… your choice! Assignment Guidelines: Step 1: If you’d like, you can do this assignment in pairs! That means that you can do one assignment together, and both submit the same assignment. If you choose to do this with another student, simply write me a quick note in your submission text box so that I know to look for that. And if you do it solo, that’s fine too. Either way! Step 2: Review the scene size up steps and the victim assessment steps. These can be found in Ch. 4 in your textbook, or in this assignment folder in your Blackboard. Make sure to cover both the scene size up steps and the victim assessment steps! Step 3: Decide if you are doing a Powtoon demonstration or a video demonstration. Yay, technology! Instructions for both methods are outlined below. IF YOU CHOOSE TO DO A POWTOON: Create an animated explainer with a minimum of 5 slides. Your characters should include at least one first-aider and one victim. Of course, you can have more characters than this if you want. Use word bubbles or voice-overs for your characters’ narration. Either way, clearly explain what the characters are doing. For example, as a character is putting on gloves, verbalize or word bubble that they are putting on gloves so that I can clearly see that you’re fulfilling step 1 of the scene size-up steps. If I can’t tell that you are doing the step, then I can’t give you credit for it! (If you don’t know what I’m talking about when I say “putting on your gloves as part of Step 1”, re-review both the scene size-up steps and the victim assessment routine that I’ve posted in the assignment folder). I am putting some basic instructions and how to submit your slideshow in the assignment folder. However, you will certainly have to play around with it and figure it out, just like any other presentation software (such as Prezi). Learning how to use new software is part of the fun!

Posted in Law