my assignment is first chapter of my dissertation which is porposal as follow:
my assignment is first chapter of my dissertation which is porposal as follow:
abstract
2. Introduction
1.2
Background
2.2
Motivation
3.1
Importance
3.2
proplem statement
4.
objective
5.
literature review
1.5
What is known/done
2.5
Why still necessary
6.
research methodology
1.6
what to do
2.6 how
7.
references
Fact Pattern
Federal law creates a substantial tax credit for renewable energy p
Fact Pattern
Federal law creates a substantial tax credit for renewable energy projects by residents and businesses, called the energy investment tax credit (ITC). The amount of the ITC credit depends, according to the statute, on the date at which “construction…begins.” The full amount of the credit is available only for projects begun before a certain date established by law.
In 2013, the IRS issued a “notice” providing two methods of establishing when “construction” on a solar project has “begun”:
The first method provides that construction has begun when “physical work of a significant nature” has been carried out.
The second method provides that construction has begun when the entity carrying out the project has paid five percent or more of the total cost of the facility.
According to the notice, a project is considered to have begun whenever either of the two tests is met, so long as the project is under “continuous efforts to advance towards completion” once initiated. Whether “continuous efforts to advance towards completion” exist is assessed using all the facts and circumstances, but in all cases (according to a later, 2016 notice) will be deemed to exist if the project has been completed within four years of the year when construction was begun.
The 2013 “notice” was issued by the IRS on its own initiative and did not go through notice and comment rule-making procedures. It is not a regulation. The “notice” has since been updated many times (for example in 2018), but not in ways that are relevant to this problem. You may ignore these later notices and need not consult them.
You are part of an organization that is undertaking a large-scale, complex solar energy project. Your organization expects to be able to complete substantial planning and design of the project in a year that is early enough to qualify for the credit. However, you also expect that construction work will not start until later, in a year that would be too late to qualify for the full credit under current law. Moreover, you are concerned that the work may take about six years to complete, given the scope of the project and its complex nature.
Assignment
You are asked to write a memo of no more than five pages (double-spaced) addressing the following questions:
Is your organization likely to qualify for the credit under the guidelines laid out in the IRS notice? Why or why not?
Using techniques of statutory interpretation, what other interpretations of the statutory term when “construction…begins” might be available, and how might your organization make use of those alternative interpretations?
What deference do you think the IRS notice will receive in the courts, and what are the odds of getting the courts to overturn or alter the IRS’s interpretation of the provision?
Do you have any advice for how the project might be rethought in order to lessen the risk that your organization will not ultimately qualify for the tax credit?
Readings
The following readings should be consulted to carry out the assignment. You are not expected, and do not need to consult, any additional readings.
The 2013 IRS notice
Actions
providing guidance on the date when construction has “begun.”
The 2016 IRS notice
Actions
providing that projects completed within four years would automatically satisfy the “continuous program of construction” requirement.
Brian Americus and Gary L. Hecimovich (Deloitte), Special Report: Digging In: Beginning of Construction for Energy Credits (2018)
Actions
.
Learning Goal: I’m working on a law test / quiz prep and need support to help me
Learning Goal: I’m working on a law test / quiz prep and need support to help me learn.
Discuss Relation between Law and Morality(0ne page).APA referencing
Check attachment called “Contract Law Instructions” – that contains the question
Check attachment called “Contract Law Instructions” – that contains the questions for the paper which needs to be answered. You must answer 5 questions total – 3 are essay questions and 2 are problem questions. Max 350 words each. Check how to cite properly. Any sources quoted, references to the work of others, and sources of law must be
referenced using either OSCOLA or Harvard referencing.
References and bibliography do not count towards the word limit.
Attached are themes terms concepts etc of Contract Law in the UK.
This week we’re going to review the Fourth Amendment and how it applies to moder
This week we’re going to review the Fourth Amendment and how it applies to modern technology. This topic should incorporate your Criminal Law and Constitutional Law classes you’ve taken as part of your studies. As a review, remember that the Fourth Amendment only protects against searches and seizures conducted by the government or pursuant to government direction, and it applies only if a person has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the place or thing being searched. I posted a quick review outline within the lesson for a refresher. So, with the advancements in modern technology available to law enforcement, the question then becomes where do we draw the line where the government’s use of this technology violates the Fourth Amendment?
Can the police seize your phone without a warrant and flip through it?
Can a police department fly a drone directly over your back yard to see if you’re growing illegal drugs?
I posted some great articles in the lesson to help guide you along… Please compose a 4 to 6 page paper on this topic. Again, like most of our assignments, this is very open-ended, and you select anything specific within the topic to research. Remember you shouldn’t just be answering the questions above, but you should do some research on the topic and provide some meaningful content. You can collect information in any way you wish, just be sure it is reliable information. In other words, use research articles, papers, studies, etc from sources you are familiar with and are trustworthy.
Must be typed using 12 point font in Times New Roman – double spaced with normal margins
Include a works cited page/bibliography
Must include a minimum of three sources
Papers will be checked for plagiarism.
Does NOT have to follow ABA or other standardized format.
Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, review The Federal Trade Commi
Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, review The Federal Trade Commission video and Federal Trade Commission https://www.ftc.gov/. Also review Chapter 5 of the textbook and other resources on “greenwashing”. This include article on A guide to greenwashing and how to spot, The FTC is expected to crack down on “greenwashing”, and Green Guides https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/topics/truth-advertising/green-guides
In the business sector, there is often a conflict between the interests of business organizations in maximizing profits and the public’s interest in receiving complete, truthful, and non-misleading information about products that they purchase. A related area of concern is when products are heavily promoted as being environmentally friendly. This practice is known as “greenwashing.”
Your discussion should address the following questions:
Identify what legal issues are involved in using greenwashing tactics to market products. Explain how this practice is regulated.
Discuss from a business perspective, if the legal marketing of products as being “green” or “friendly to the environment” is an ethical practice. If so, what ethical theory would justify this type of marketing?
If you were a marketing executive, would you support the practice of greenwashing? Explain why or why not.
Citation for chapters
Seaquist, G. (2012). Business law for managers. Zovio.
You will need to IRAC the following cases and answer a total of 4 problems. Each
You will need to IRAC the following cases and answer a total of 4 problems. Each case only has 1 problem following the case- the other Notes and Questions are really notes. For that reason, I have added additional questions below from page 10 of your reading. Make sure you submit 2 case IRACS and answers to 4 problems total. 1. IRAC Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommate.com, LLC 2. IRAC Sommer v. Kridel Additional Problems to choose from: William Neithamer, who is gay and HIV positive attempted to rent an apartment from Brenneman Properties. Neithamer did not reveal his HIV status, but admitted to the property manager that he had dismal credit because he had recently devoted all of his resources to taking care of a lover who had died of AIDS. Neithamer, however, offered to pre-pay one year’s rent. Brenneman Properties rejected Neithamer’s application and, in turn, Neithamer sued under the FHA. Does he have a case? See Neithamer v. Brenneman Property Services, Inc., 81 F. Supp 2d 1 (D.C. 1999). Over the phone, Landlord said to Plaintiff, “Do you have children? I don’t want any little boys because they’ll mess up the house and nobody would be here to watch them. Really, this house isn’t good for kids because it’s right next to a main road.” Plaintiff sues. Landlord argues that her statements only show that she is concerned about the welfare of children. Is that a legitimate non-discriminatory reason to refuse to rent? A local government has decided to knock down two high-rise public housing projects within its borders. The high-rises primarily house recent immigrants from Guatemala. A local advocacy group brings a lawsuit on their behalf, claiming that the government action has a disparate impact on a protected group. Is this a disparate treatment or disparate impact case? Can you think of a non-discriminatory reason why the government may have taken such an action
i am a student doing my barrister training course in England, and we have a subm
i am a student doing my barrister training course in England, and we have a submission advocacy module where we have to draft a skeleton argument, submit it, and then give a submission using that skeleton argument. moreover i have attached instructions, sample of drafting provided by university, which you can use to see the structure of the drafting skelton requirment of university and assessment rubric to help in drafting. this is a drafting skeleton argument in contract case for summary judgement. i request please read the documents sent properly. moreover, dear write i need 60% mask to passs the module and you know barrister training course is very complicated so please give full attention while completing it. if there is difficulty completing, please cancel the order because this is my last resit chance to pass the module; otherwise, i will fail the course. moreover please use cases, civil procedure rule etc.
please don’t write background facts of the case in the background fact area because i will write back ground fact myself.
the second most important thisng is there should be bundle of index at seprate page however i have attach the doscument which will give the idea of the exemplar index bundle
Catherine (wife) and Peter (husband) Mallen had lived together unmarried for som
Catherine (wife) and Peter (husband) Mallen had lived together unmarried for some four years when Catherine got pregnant and a marriage was arranged. Peter asked Catherine to sign a prenuptial agreement. Although his financial statement attached to the agreement did not state his income at $560,000 per year, it showed he was wealthy, and she had lived with him for four years and knew from their standard of living that he had a significant income. Catherine contends that failure to disclose Peter’s income was a nondisclosure of a material fact when the agreement was drawn up and that accordingly the agreement is not valid. Peter contends that he fully disclosed his net worth and that Catherine was well aware of his significant income. Further, he contends that disparities in the parties’ financial status and business experience did not make the agreement unconscionable.
Please answer ALL of the following questions in your discussion:
Was the agreement obtained through fraud?
Was the agreement obtained through duress?
Was the agreement obtained through nondisclosure of material facts?
Was the agreement unconscionable?
Make sure you include a definition with page references to the eText for each of these terms.
You must post an original comment of 150-250 words with citations to sources used, such as eText page references and/or credible websites) and respond to two classmates’ posts.
Also called an advocacy letter, a demand letter is meant to persuade someone to
Also called an advocacy letter, a demand letter is meant to persuade someone to take action favorable to the interests of the client or cease acting in a manner that is detrimental to the client. It may be as simple as demanding payment on a debt or as complex as requesting that a course of conduct be taken such as rehiring an employee. Your task is to advocate for a client to demand that a refund be issued, or an item be repaired for a client. Instructions/scenario: A client, Mrs. Tatum, purchased a new microwave oven from Inki Appliances Company. No written or oral warranty was given when the sale was made. The microwave stopped working one week after Mrs. Tatum took it home. She returned the microwave three days after it stopped working. The owner of the Inki Appliances Company refused to repair or replace the microwave or give Mrs. Tatum her money back. Prepare a two-page demand letter (no more or less than that) to be sent to Inki Appliances. The letter is to be signed by your supervising attorney, Alice Black. Mr. Terry Spear is the president of Inki Appliances Company, and the address is 1001 Maple Drive, Friendly, NW, 00065. Chapter 19 (specifically pages 536-540) of the Putman and Albright text provide specific guidelines and examples to guide you. Draw from these laws to support and make your argument: Statutory Law: Section 50-102-314 of the New Washington statutes provides that “a warranty that the goods shall be merchantable is implied…if the seller is a merchant with respect to the goods of that kind.” Mr. Terry Spear is a merchant. Mrs. Tatum did not misuse the microwave or in any other way to cause it to quit working. Case Law: The case on point is Smith v. Appliance City, 56 N. Wash. 162, 868 N. E. 997 (1996). In Smith, the New Washington supreme court ruled that the seller has three options when an implied warranty is breached: return the purchase price to the buyer, repair the merchandise, or replace the merchandise. A sample demand letter from a previous class is attached below. This is just a sample and not a perfect model. Plagiarizing this document can have serious consequences.