Reflection of Historical and Social Contexts in the Novels ‘The Great Gatsby’, ‘Jasper Jones’ and ‘Pride and Prejudice’

Novels are often reflections of the contexts in which they were produced, and still have value for readers today. Examples of such novels include ‘The Great Gatsby’, written by F. Scott Fitzgerald in the 1920s, ‘Jasper Jones’, written by Craig Silvey in 2009, and ‘Pride and Prejudice’, written by author Jane Austin in 1813. All three of these novels portray a reflection of the context in which they were produced, whether that be at the time they were set, like ‘The Great Gatsby’ or ‘Pride and Prejudice’, or a later time which presents a more modern portrayal of its context, such as in ‘Jasper Jones’. Through the characterization of characters, their attitudes and values, important plot details and focusing on certain contextual details, these novels are reflections on the historical and social contexts in which they were produced, and most certainly still have value for readers today.

The novels discussed are all reflections of the contexts in which they were produced, and still have great value for readers today, through the messages they teach. The novel ‘The Great Gatsby’ provides an insight to the corruption, recklessness and materialism, economic rise created in the 1920s, and that readers today should not lose sight of their true dreams, as Gatsby did. In the novel ‘Jasper Jones’, author Craig Silvey, suggests that 1960s Australia was very racist against indigenous people, and that the reader shouldn’t make false predicaments and assumptions about a person based on the color of their skin, as Jasper Jones is presumed by the townspeople to have committed the murder, even though he’s innocent. The novel ‘Pride and Prejudice’ portrays a society where a woman’s reputation is seen as utmost important, and can be put under scrutiny from others if they don’t look, speak, or behave a certain way, however Austin shows the reader that individuality and integrity are just as important to have through the characterization of Elizabeth. All three novels reflect the historical and social contexts of the time in which they were produced, and that by reading them, the reader will learn an important lesson that is still valuable today.

‘The Great Gatsby’ is a reflection of the historical and social context of the 1920s, at which the novel was set and produced. Despite the 1920s being seen as a time of great optimism and economic expansion after the end of World War I, the author F. Scott Fitzgerald portrays a desolate view of this time, focusing on corruption, recklessness and materialism. As people began seeking stock market fortunes, the novel focuses on the nature of the ‘American Dream’ and the belief that if you work hard, you can achieve happiness and wealth. However, as seen through the character of Jay Gatsby, Fitzgerald suggests that easy money can corrupt this dream. Gatsby originally sought wealth to win over Daisy, in the belief that if he owned enough possessions and made enough money, he would become equal in status to her. However, in the journey to achieve this goal, he pursues money via unlawful practices and loses Daisy’s love, despite the large amount of money he acquired. Gatsby’s failure to claim Daisy’s love doesn’t mean that the American Dream is unachievable, but rather proves the foolishness of bypassing that dream by allowing corruption and materialism to prevail over hard work and real love. Nick states, “Perhaps Gatsby no longer cared. If that was true, he must have felt that he had lost the old warm world, paid a high price for living too long with a single dream”, suggesting that although the American Dream wasn’t necessarily unachievable during this time, it was an unwise goal that led many people into corruption. This message still has value for readers today as it outlines the importance of not losing track of your dreams, even when other temptations arise. Towards the end of the novel Nick says, “He had come a long way to this blue lawn and his dream must have seemed so close that he could hardly fail to grasp it. He did not know that it was already behind him, somewhere back in that vast obscurity beyond the city, where the dark fields of the republic rolled on under the night”, which suggests that Gatsby’s original dream was already behind him, as he had been so focused on his wealth, rather than his happiness and love, making it impossible to achieve. ‘The Great Gatsby’ reflects the corrupt nature of the economic rise in the 1920s, leaving the reader with a valuable lesson to not lose sight of their goals.

The novel ‘Jasper Jones’ sets in the 1960s, is a reflection of racism in Australia during this time, and shows how readers today should not have preconceived ideas on others based on the color of their skin. Throughout the novel, a young ‘half caste’ boy tries to discover who murdered Laura Wishart, as an attempt to not be blamed for the crime himself. Even though Jasper didn’t actually commit the crime, he lives with the assumption that the murder will be pinned on him and he will be automatically arrested for her murder because of his troublemaker reputation and the color of his skin. This can be shown when he says, “Bloody hell. Listen, Charlie, we can’t tell anyone. No way. Specially the police. Because they are gonna say it was me. Straight up. Understand?”. Although the novel is set in the 1960s, it was produced in 2009, which suggests that the author, Craig Silvey, has purposely made Jasper innocent to highlight the racism and false accusations against indigenous people during the 1960s, which we began to have a fuller understanding of in 2009. At the end of the novel, Charlie realizes that Jasper will most likely be blamed for the fire at Eliza’s house, as despite not actually being guilty, the racist assumptions the townspeople have of him will always lead him to be wrongly accused. Perhaps the most valuable lesson for the reader is that although Jasper was innocent, it was because of preconceived and racist ideas people had of him that he was routinely blamed for other people’s crimes. ‘Jasper Jones’ is a great reflection of a modern viewpoint of racism in the 1960s and holds large value for the readers about judging people based on appearances.

‘Pride and Prejudice’, a novel written by Jane Austin from the late 1700s to early 1800s and published around the same time, can be seen as a reflection of the social context, such as the importance of reputation during this time period. ‘Pride and Prejudice’ depicts a society where the reputation of a woman and her family is very important, and that by not behaving, speaking or looking a certain way, women can put themselves under scrutiny from others. This can be seen when Elizabeth walks three miles to Netherfield, to look after Jane, her sick sister. Mrs. Hurst states, “She has nothing, in short, to recommend her, but being an excellent walker. I shall never forget her appearance this morning. She really looked almost wild”, which suggests that Elizabeth is different from the upper-class women who would choose to keep their good reputation, over visiting a sick family member. Elizabeth considers herself to have a high level of integrity, so therefore behaves in ways that accord to her definition of integrity, despite what others may think. This is a very valuable lesson to readers today, as even though Elizabeth was pressured to act in accord with the social norms, she was proud of her individualism and didn’t give in to society’s habit to maintain a perfect reputation. This can be seen when she rejects both Mr. Collins and Mr. Darcy’s first proposal, despite the financial and social pressures she was facing, which eventually lead to her marriage with someone who would truly make her happy.

The novels discussed are all reflections of the contexts in which they were produced, and still have great value for readers today, through the messages they teach. The novel ‘The Great Gatsby’ provides an insight to the corruption, recklessness and materialism, economic rise created in the 1920s, and that readers today should not lose sight of their true dreams, as Gatsby did. In the novel ‘Jasper Jones’, author Craig Silvey suggests that 1960s Australia was very racist against indigenous people, and that the reader shouldn’t make false predicaments and assumptions about a person based on the color of their skin, as Jasper Jones is presumed by the townspeople to have committed the murder, even though he’s innocent. The novel ‘Pride and Prejudice’ portrays a society where a woman’s reputation is seen as utmost important, and can be put under scrutiny from others if they don’t look, speak, or behave a certain way, however Austin shows the reader that individuality and integrity are just as important to have through the characterization of Elizabeth. All three novels reflect the historical and social contexts of the time in which they were produced, and that by reading them, the reader will learn an important lesson that is still valuable today.

Truth Doesn’t Always Triumph as the Ultimate Injustice in ‘Jasper Johns’

Secrets and personal information must be kept private in order to hide any appearance of abnormality. This negotiation on truth can lead to unjust results. The novel, ‘Jasper Jones’, by Craig Silvey, is set in the small town of Corrigan during the 1960s. Being a small town, citizens are very close to each other therefore have the tendency to stock up on gossip and secrets. However, when the truth is let out, it doesn’t always succeed in serving justice. The injustice of the truth being disclosed from the larger community is forced upon the protagonists of ‘Jasper Jones’ in order to avoid prejudice, protection from other’s doubt and to find escape from a restless life. Manipulation of the truth and no proper castigation given to those in power is the ultimate injustice in ‘Jasper Jones’.

Silvey outlines that individuals must hide the moral truth in order to avoid being victimized by prejudice. One’s fear of racial discrimination can cause one to conceal the truth. As Jasper lives in a society of judgement that “stick to what they know” and “what they’ve bin told”, he is forced to give up his conscience of right and wrong. The truth about Laura’s death is well known to Jasper and Charlie but decide to conceal it from others because Jasper isn’t “protected” as “the town thinks of him as an animal” and continuously fail to “understand” him. Since Laura’s disappearance is mysterious, Charlie and Jasper are certain that the sarge and the rest of the town will use it as an “excuse” to get Jasper “locked up”. Due to such prejudice, Charlie decides to protect Jasper from further persecution and vow to keep the peace in the community. Although the truth is known to provide justice to the Wishart family, Jasper must find a way to find Laura’s killer and protect himself from abuse. Therefore, the truth is manipulated and the idea of justice has been ignored due to the essentiality of survival. Although one of the factors for hiding the truth was to protect Jasper, information can also be withheld to keep the peace in the community and not disrupt status quo.

Dishonesty starts when an individual cannot reconcile a difficult experience. Lying comes from fear and the fear of stirring commotion amongst a community can cause for justice to not prevail. Eliza discloses the truth from Charlie and the rest of the community in order to keep the “peace” and avoid further questioning from the sarge and her family. However, Eliza cannot stand the fact that her father will get away with impregnating her sister and in order to cope with the guilt burdening Eliza, she burns down the house with her “monstrous” father inside. She looks at her burning home “dispassionately as though it was someone else’s”. The fire caused harm upon Pete Wishart whose health deteriorated from the fire. This event gave Chalie, Jasper and Eliza a sense of relief and justice. Charlie realizes that “Eliza might be less concerned with what’s right… about uncovering the truth”. Although Eliza tells her “brittle mother” the grim truth about Laura, the truth does not prevail because both hearts are fragile and “weak”, they are powerless to take any legal action. Although some sort of punishment has been given to the shire president, “the secret has been sealed with the Wisharts” who struggle to survive with the guilt of knowing no legal action has been taken. Such secreted truths under a household roof can cause distant and fragile relationships.

Silvey elicits that built up secrets and lies lead to guilt which forms agitated and dishonest relationships with loved ones. Trust is fragile. Secrets and lies threaten trust and can damage individuals and relationships. This is evident when, Ruth sought escape from her “miserable” life in her affair with the sarge. She did not maintain a “commitment… of loyalty” to Charlie or Wesley and hence felt “ashamed” of her actions. Since she knew that this was morally “wrong”, she did not feel comfortable to spend a truthful bond with Charlie or Wesley. “She went back to being a spoiled girl” amidst the comfort of her family in the city. This immorality forced her to have a dishonest relationship with Charlie and a tainted life in the city. The truth has somewhat triumphed in this situation amongst the Bucktin ménage as Wesley and Charlie withdraw their amity with Ruth and she lives in a life with no affection. Thus, Silvey illustrates the notion to readers that those who resort to unethical means will always be given some sort of consequential treatment but not completely what they deserve.

Ultimately, Silvey suggests that individuals withheld secrets to protect themselves and loved ones but when they are let out, justice is not always established. The truth may struggle to be let out due to the racist society that the protagonists of ‘Jasper Jones’ are situated in. In order to protect themselves and avoid suspicion from the wider community, the main characters must discover “the gift of lies”. Silvey elicits that escapism is an important tool used by humans to cope with sadness. Furthermore, human nature leads to agitation when guilt is built up, this behavior can form untrustworthy relationships. When truth is relating to a society, all aspects may not receive neutrality due to contradicting opinions. The truth somewhat triumphs in situations of extreme immoralities such as the abuse of Laura and Ruth’s affair, however, the full form of justice including legal action is never achieved which is the ultimate injustice.