Category: Inequality

Education is critical to human growth because it allows people to gain the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required for fulfilling and productive lives. Not every kid in the United States has equal access to high-quality education. Meatto (2019) acknowledges that racial segregation in public schools has been unlawful in the United States for sixty-five years. Nonetheless, American public schools remain disproportionately segregated and unequal, with severe repercussions for kids, particularly students of color (Meatto, 2019). The intersection of socioeconomic and racial division has widened educational differences between affluent and poor and between white and minority students. The nations severely uneven and segregated K-12 public education system is the most visible manifestation of education inequality and a significant contributor to it.

The United States is not adhering to its pledge to equal education opportunities. Since the country underinvests in public education by over $150 billion yearly, millions of American children, specifically Black, brown, and low-income children, are denied the chance to succeed (The Century Foundation, 2020). Furthermore, students in the United States do worse than students in other developed countries, with considerable differences along ethnic, racial, and socioeconomic categories (The Century Foundation, 2020; Tucker, 2021). Hence, volatility in education investment closely parallels diversity in student results. Students tend to obtain better grades and score higher in states that invest more in public schools.

Different and unequal experiences influencing students understanding and knowledge of race and diversity throughout K-12 will follow them into higher education. Gordon and Reber (2021) state that the educational system should emphasize vulnerable students. Nonetheless, opponents of this approach argue that diversity efforts must go beyond demographic efforts to achieve genuine integration. If knowledge is power, then students from various backgrounds and experiences may feel undervalued when schools or universities exclusively provide a European-centric curriculum as the valued knowledge (Wells, 2020). Likewise, when educational institutions establish disciplinarily or conduct policies or processes that only acknowledge particular norms of behavior and presentation of students from specific backgrounds, others will feel excluded.

State governments make most key educational policies concerning elementary and secondary school decisions in the United States. Gordon and Rebel (2021) confirm that local districts are responsible for the implementation choices involved with managing schools. While the federal government may play an important role in R&D and offer much-needed financial help, tying federal funds to conditions is a powerful but limited instrument (Gordon & Rebel, 2021). Understanding the significance of non-school elements in influencing educational achievements in the country is vital. For instance, the corrosive effects of systemic oppression and racism across American society and the negative repercussions of childhood poverty lead to educational inequalities (Gordon & Rebel, 2021). The solutions to these issues are simultaneously upgrading school systems and providing equal funding to all schools. Retraining current instructors can also increase teacher quality (Gordon & Rebel, 2021). Partnering student teachers with more pedagogically competent cooperating teachers, for instance, boosts their effectiveness as new instructors.

To conclude, one of the most apparent expressions of education inequality, as well as a primary contributor, is the nations profoundly unequal and segregated K-12 public school system. Although the educational system may help vulnerable kids tackle the problem, opponents of this method contend that in order to achieve real integration, diversity initiatives must go beyond race. Others will feel alienated when educational institutions construct disciplinary mechanisms that assist pupils from particular backgrounds. As a result, the solution is to focus on equitable opportunities, funding, and teacher quality.

References

Gordon, N., & Rebel, S. (2021). Addressing inequities in the US K-12 education system. Economic Strategy Group. Web.

Meatto, K. (2019). Still separate, still unequal: Teaching about school segregation and educational inequality. The New York Times. Web.

The Century Foundation. (2020). Closing Americas education funding gaps. The Century Foundation. Web.

Tucker, M. (2021). Why other countries keep outperforming us in education (and how to catch up). Education Week. Web.

Wells, A. S. (2020). Racial, ethnic, and cultural diversity across K12 and higher education sectors: Challenges and opportunities for cross-sector learning. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 52(2), 5661. Web.

One of the most effective methods for advancing and improving financial knowledge is the use of legislation and public policy initiatives. Individual Development Accounts, for example, are a legislative program started in the mid-1990s to assist low-income earners in building assets (Auclert, 2019). In conjunction with this policy, the Savings Are Vital for Everyones Retirement Act included a significant education campaign (Saving Matters). Furthermore, the US Treasury integrated a consumer awareness campaign in its EFT 99 plan for the transformation to an all-electronic operation. Since contemporary welfare reform laws do not necessitate it, most programs incorporate basic financial planning advice as part of membership training. A breakdown of how to raise the publics interest in monetary policy, the impact of the federal reserves high interests, and inequality resulting from low rates form the basis of this paper.

Raising Citizens Interest in Monetary Policy

By controlling the amount of money in circulation, central banks can increase public interest in monetary policy. This is further accomplished through the use of open market operations, which involve the purchase of treasury bonds. Central banks buy government securities from commercial banks and institutions to boost the amount of money in circulation. This increases bank assets, allowing them to lend more money (Auclert, 2019). Such expenditures are done by central banks as part of an expansionary monetary policy, thus affecting citizens saving and borrowing patterns.

Additionally, the Federal Reserve employs open market operations to achieve a predetermined funds rate, which refers to the rate at which banks extend credit to other financial institutions. The federal funds rate is determined by the average of the premiums negotiated by each lending-borrowing dyad. As a result, this rate influences nearly all interest rates that are used by commercial banks to lend money to the general public. The section below highlights the effect of the federal reserve maintaining high borrowing rates.

Impact of Federal Reserves High-Interest Rates

If the federal reserve had not lowered the interest rate, there would be a rise in the prime rate, commonly referred to as the Bank Prime Loan to Value ratio. The prime rate is the borrowing price offered by banks to their clients who have excellent credit scores. Other types of personal loans are predicated on this value, as a higher prime rate implies that banks will raise fixed borrowing charges when performing risk evaluation on less creditworthy enterprises and households. An increase in prime rate consequently results in higher money market and certificate of deposit rates (Brookings Institution, 2015). Theoretically, this should increase business and consumer savings as they will get a better return. Additionally, individuals with a debt burden may strive to repay their financial commitments to counterbalance the higher fixed rates relating to credit cards, mortgage loans, or other borrowings. The section that follows discusses some of the consequences of prolonged low-interest rates.

Inequality Resulting from Federal Reserves Maintaining Low-Interest Rates

From my perspective, I would not recommend the federal reserve keep interest rates low for a long time. This is because the emergence of unfavorable business cycles experienced within the last few decades is a result of the Federal Reserve maintaining a near-zero interest rate policy. Additionally, prolonging these low rates encourages economic inequality by widening the wealth gap (Dorfman, 2015). The Federals low-interest rates are widely thought to be the reason for the inflated stock market prices. Wealth disparity has become worse as a result of the Federals role in escalating stock prices since individuals who are wealthier hold more shares for speculative motives. Concurrently, the low-interest rates have resulted in affordable borrowing costs for big businesses with easy access to capital markets.

References

Auclert, A. (2019). Monetary policy and the redistribution channel. American Economic Review, 109(6), 2333-67. Web.

Brookings Institution. (2015). Inequality and monetary policy, conventional and unconventional. Web.

Dorfman, J. (2015). The Feds low-interest rates are increasing inequality. Forbes.

Introduction

The inequality in financial matters, socioeconomic policies and the public domain has become a global concern. Russia has moved from the Soviet era of populism to abject poverty and extreme riches. The fast financial development that Russia has encountered in the previous decade did not cause any change in the poverty level and inequality among its citizens. Since the absolute destitution rate has considerably reduced from 29% in 2000 to 15% in 2016, a critical part of the Russian populace benefits from economic development (Bobkova, Vakhtinab & Simonovac 2016). Some analysts argue that inequality is a fundamental condition of economic development when put into the genuine setting; this contention seems shortsighted, if not false. Inequality influences the rising crime rate, lower dimensions of trust, health challenges and corruption. This paper argues that corruption regional inequalities and bias policy framework are the causes of inequality in Russia.

Problem Statement and Research Question

Inequality is imperative for poverty evaluation since the manners in which riches and income are disseminated in a nation decide the degree and intellectual ability of poverty experienced by its populace. As the global experience proposes, social orders with an increasingly equivalent circulation of income have lower levels of destitution. Over the years, Russia has seen an uncommon development of income disparity. By 1980, the dimension of inequality in Russia surpassed many G20 nations, including Brazil, Canada, Germany, India, China and Turkey (Bobkova, Vakhtinab & Simonovac 2016). The ratio of the income of the most extravagant 10% of the populace to the income of the least fortunate 10% in Russia has hopped from 8 to 16, and the Gini coefficient moved from 0.23 to 0.48 (Bobkova, Vakhtinab & Simonovac 2016; Russell 2018). Based on these assumptions, inequality in Russia has kept on developing irrespective of government efforts. The inequality statistic highlights the motivation for this research. Based on the context of the problem statement, two research questions will be developed for this study.

Research Questions

1. What are the predisposing factors of inequality in Russia?
2. Does corruption influence inequality in Russia?

Literature Review

Socioeconomic Inequality and the Russian Population

The developing dimension of inequality, which includes the emotional experience of poverty and the restricting opportunities to improve the standard of living, aggravates the condition of impoverished individuals in Russia. With Moscow being the home of many billionaires and Russias goals to introduce itself as a thriving market destination and income nation, poor people have become undetectable and marginalised. Inequality is the ratio of divergence among high and low-income earners. Socioeconomic inequality relates to variations in financial and social assets that connect the social class and incorporates salaries, income, education, employment and healthcare delivery that add to a feeling of prosperity (Amo-Adjei et al. 2018).

Consequently, inequality evaluations are marked as income or the wellbeing status. Income disparities are directed by social exchanges, taxes, reimbursements and are estimated at the family unit level. Based on these indicators, income inequality is estimated by the Gini coefficient of expendable income. Since the start of the market change in 1991, monetary inequality in Russia has risen rapidly. Between 1990 and 2018, the Gini coefficient of discretionary cash flow in Russia expanded from 0.23 to 0.48 and the distinction between the incomes of high-income earners and least fortunate percentage expanded from 4 to 17 (Anderson, Getmansky & Hirsch-Hoefler 2018; Russell 2018). By implication, one per cent of the Russian population claims 71 per cent of the nations wealth. Income inequality has been expanding in many nations, yet barely any growing economy has encountered such an extreme change in income inequality in such a brief timeframe as Russia (Amo-Adjei et al. 2018).

Economic and social disparities are interlinked and intensify each other, energising imbalances in living norms and access to financial, social and health care foundations (Marmot 2016). This anomaly further divides Russia along income and social status lines, thereby widening the inequality gap. An individuals income and social class dictate his or her access to quality human services in Russia (Toch-Marquardt 2017). Russians are progressively paying for education as private mentoring has taken over the subsidised institutions for advanced education. The percentage of subsidised colleges of education dropped from 65.5 in 2000 to 38.5 in 2016 (Russell 2018). Consequently, the ratio of private educational centres funded by wealthy individuals rose to 36.3 per cent in 2012 compared with 3.8 per cent of low-income earners (Bobkova, Vakhtinab & Simonovac 2016). Inequality in access to education creates a disparity in employment because graduates with lower education are at a higher risk of being utilised for odd jobs. The likelihood of employment is reliant on the locale of habitation since unemployment rates differ among districts. For instance, the statistics on regional unemployment showed 1% unemployment in Moscow and 50% unemployment in Ingushetia (Ardelyanova & Obryvalina 2018).

Imbalances along sexual orientation, inability and residency status are some predisposing factors to inequality in access to employment (Odgers & Adler 2018). Economic inequality, as indicated by the perspectives on the Russian populace prompts disparity under the law. Russians believe the current legal framework defends the premiums of wealthy and persuasive individuals more than the interest of low-income earners. A report revealed that more than 30 per cent of poor and 25 per cent of average income earners had their rights violated (Fink et al. 2017). There is a spotlight on the battle against corruption, which might be credited to the Russian discontent with higher dimensions of financial inequality.

Russian policymakers have begun endeavouring to address income inequality. The measures have primarily involved national economic improvement programs, interregional spending plans and expanded cost of social insurance schemes with an emphasis on weak citizens. The phenomenon of income disparity cannot be acknowledged without the thought of territorial inequality. Provincial inequality has been one of the critical variables, adding to the abnormal state of income disparity in Russia (Gorina, Agadjanian & Zotova 2018). Income, wellbeing and prosperity of an individual are identified with the district of habitation. Thus, the elements of regional disparities during the Soviet regime featured some indicators in financial pointers, for example, GDP, employment rate, income per capita and destitution rate. The assumption that unequal access to health care services and education is legitimate by contrast in income has considerably changed in Russia (Oskrochi, Bani-Mustafa & Oskrochi 2018).

Inequality in Access to Education

Inequality in access to education is a moderately ongoing challenge in Russia. During the communist rule, education was widespread and free for all income earners. Although free education remains accessible, parents are paying for additional courses and private coaches to enhance the diminishing nature of education and to influence the odds of taking advanced education. Again, the income dimension of a family is a factor of inequality because expanding income disparity converts to imbalances in access to quality education. In the advanced education environment, the circumstance has changed drastically.

During the communist rule, the ratio of self-subsidised learning and freely financed education switched. Since education has become commercialised, the cost of learning focuses on high-income earners. Parents are spending more on their kids education, and the proportion of this number is expanding among high-income earners. Because of the high cost of learning, education imbalances are created between the rich and the poor. Spatial disparity characterises a significant factor of inequality in access to education. Noteworthy contrasts in the quality of education among locales, urban and country territories have been observed. Social pointers, for example, handicap status can limit an individuals access to education (Hoffmann et al. 2016). Thus, the access of individuals with an inability to proficient and advanced education remains constrained. Inequality in access to learning is an issue for further propagation of income disparity in Russia, considering the role of advanced education factor.

Empirical Review

Lim et al. (2018) studied inequality among districts that describes the disparity in the vast land territory of the Russian Federation. The regions with oil and gas resources and human capital during the socialist period profited lopsidedly from the market economy. Price and market development brought along the fast momentary separation in income by area, social stratum and financial status. Shockingly, territories what experienced rapid economic growth also witnessed a remarkable increase in inequality while destitution declined at the same time. As indicated in previous works of literature, districts can benefit from the decline in destitution and rising incomes, yet experience tougher income incongruities at the same time (Lim et al. 2018). The issues stimulating inequality include the non-redistributive financial policy, a frail association of work and differing domain of the Russian Federation (Paul & Valtonen 2016).

Soviet history assumes a deciding influence on inequality. The Soviet government ensured full work and equivalent wages, while social advantages were attached to job offers. However, the instruments of paying wages and giving social services were reorganised and transformed by sharp practices thereby expanding income inequality. This implied that wages varied between successful and failed undertakings. Consequently, individuals had to pay for public services. A standout among the most troublesome difficulties of building a focused market economy was the absence of safety structures because social insurance was customarily given by employers (Ngamaba, Panagioti & Armitage 2018). Tax evasion was another challenge experienced during the Putin era, which created corruption and integrity issues. This paper suggests that the causes of inequality in Russia include a fiscal policy that favours the rich, corruption, regional inequalities and historical events (Ngamaba, Panagioti & Armitage 2018).

Measuring Inequality

Simon Kuznets underscored the prevalence of the family unit on theoretical assumptions. Concern about economic inequality describes how individuals utilise resources. Regardless of whether information limitations compel researchers to evaluate the annual disparity unlike life-cycle inequality, the economist argued for yearly family measurement. The numerator represents the incomes of the family unit and the denominator displays the number of identical shoppers. The economist cautioned against measuring inequality among workers.

The Gini Index

A standout among the methods for estimating inequality is the Gini coefficient. The values range from 0 to 1, with a higher measure indicating higher inequality (Neumayer & Plümper 2016). However, some works of literature on the measures of inequality oppose the Gini coefficient because it captures different segments of the population (low and high-income earners). Additionally, the Gini measurement confounds the disparities concerning work and capital. Researchers recommend distribution tables as a reliable and straightforward representation of imbalances in the public space. Neumayer and Plümper (2016) censures the current estimation of monetary disparity and reveals that inequality can be undervalued because of refusal to participate in income surveys among low and high earners.

Discussion

Policy Formations and Inequality

Different administrations in Russia have tried to alleviate inequality through policy formulations such as tax reforms and retirement benefits (Fisher et al. 2016). Nevertheless, Russia has experienced net inequality, showing variations in policy enforcement to balance rising market disparity (Yu & Wang 2017). Because of this inequality, tax frameworks have declined with the outcome since high-income family units and enterprises face lower compelling duty rates (Mode, Evans & Zonderman 2016). Fiscal policy is a vital instrument in mitigating inequality. The fiscal approach plays a role in guaranteeing macro-financial security and limits the challenges that lopsidedly hurt the burdened populace (Timonin et al. 2017). Policy redistribution with other macroeconomic goals can improve the income value of the working class and in this manner bolster economic development. The redistributive function of policy strategies could be strengthened by dependence on property tax, increasing income tax assessment, reducing sharp practices of tax avoidance and improving social benefits while limiting productivity costs (Thornhill & Smirnova 2018). Equity and economic growth are enhanced by reducing tax consumption that benefits high-income earners (Ward & Viner 2017).

The reality of Russias inequality is that a small percentage of oligarchs control the countrys net wealth. This percentage (1%) controls the legislators and policy enforcement officers (Timonin et al. 2017). As a result, socioeconomic inequality has become a growing concern in Russia. The energy sector is another factor for income disparity. Few executives control the oil and gas deposits in some parts of the country thereby defrauding the public. Although the government creates policies to help the vulnerable and assist the needy, its enforcement has been hampered by corruption.

Policy Solutions

The uneven asset-based economy does not guarantee advancement and interest for human potential and therefore causes inequality. The difference in the structure of the economy lies in the return of authority to conventional enterprises, growth of small business enterprises, policy enforcement and the fight against corruption. While expanding the cost of social security has been at the focal point of the administrations approaches, the opposite side of financial strategy such as tax assessment has been missing from the anti-inequality framework. Presently, the Russian tax framework deepens income inequality. Tax avoidance is measured at 43 per cent. Although the administration has been making endeavours to authorise lawful measures against fraudulent executives, there are indications of expanding the number of employment and contract that are informalised. Researchers try to clarify tax avoidance by businesses as a response to the increase of social protection commitments and the low confidence individuals have in the administrations capacity to utilise the tax income.

Russian policymakers have been reluctant to venture into the zone of tax reforms. The diversion for persevering adherence to one digit income tax by policymakers is that varying income tax would affect the low-income earners. However, this assumption creates informalisation of the employment market and influences tax avoidance. Therefore, rather than encourage a dynamic tax regime, policymakers propose property charges, duties on luxury products and a solidarity charge for individuals with exceptionally high incomes. Nevertheless, the means to enforce those duties have been minuscule. In 2013, an expense tax on automobiles was presented; however, the anticipated land property reform was postponed indefinitely (Tan et al. 2018). The role of tax laws in the battle against income inequality is unjustified. A well-planned tax framework can decrease market income inequality, create revenue to support social insurance schemes and services.

Public health care services and education grants have robust redistributive effects (Kangmennaang & Elliott 2018). Nevertheless, the redistributive impact of these administrations remains unrecognised. While the administration has been dynamic in expanding the operating cost of social insurance schemes, public access to human services and education frameworks has been diminishing. The battle against inequality in Russia must be supported by a solid drive to make law enforcement reasonable and impartial to reduce corruption at all dimensions of social establishments. A significant number of the components influencing income inequality depend on the lower dimensions of institutional trust.

Inequality and Corruption

This paper suggests that financial disparity, as indicated by the perspectives on the Russian populace, prompts inequality under the law. Seventy-six per cent of the destitute in Russia affirm that the existing legal framework of the nation secures the premiums of wealthy individuals than the interests of the ordinary citizens (Sui, Feng & Chang 2018). Twenty-nine per cent of needy individuals and 20 per cent of non-destitute individuals revealed that they had their rights have been breached in the past three years (Ardelyanova & Obryvalina 2018). The most widely recognised cases included access to health services and social schemes, work relations and contacts with law enforcement institutions (Ramsey, Svider & Folbe 2017). In 2012, Russia ranked 133 on the Global Corruption Index (Franses & de Groot 2016). Eminently, Russia has a lower rank of corruption than Brazil and China (Franses & de Groot 2016). Although arguments on corruption focus on good governance, it could be contended that the soaring interest in battling corruption is associated with social equity and are identified with wealth and income inequality.

Conclusion

Fiscal policy is a vital instrument for lessening inequality. The fiscal approach plays a role in guaranteeing macro-financial security and limits the challenges that lopsidedly hurt the burdened populace. Policy redistribution with other macroeconomic goals can improve the income value of the working class and in this manner bolster economic development. Fiscal formulations play a role in mitigating income inequality; however, the redistributive function of policy strategies could be strengthened by dependence on riches and property tax, increasing income tax assessment, reducing sharp practices of tax avoidance, improving social benefits while limiting productivity costs. Equity and economic growth are enhanced by reducing tax consumption that benefits high-income earners. The battle against inequality in Russia must be supported by a solid drive to make law requirement reasonable and impartial to reduce corruption at all dimensions of social establishments. A significant number of the components influencing income inequality depend on the lower dimensions of institutional trust. Subsequently, the institutionalised policies, for example, dynamic tax assessment, deoffshorisation and employment in the formal area cannot be actualised in Russia, except the issues of corruption are adequately addressed.

Reference List

Amo-Adjei, J, Aduo-Adjei, K, Opoku-Nyamah, C & Izugbara, C 2018, Analysis of socioeconomic differences in the quality of antenatal services in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), PLOS ONE, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1-12.

Anderson, J, Getmansky, A & Hirsch-Hoefler, S 2018, Burden sharing: income, inequality and willingness to fight, British Journal of Political Science, pp. 1-17.

Ardelyanova, Y & Obryvalina, O 2018, Comparative analysis of inequality, corruption, and trust studies in modern societies, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 65-69.

Bobkova, V, Vakhtinab, M & Simonovac, M 2016, Economic factors of Russian inequality, International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, vol.11, no. 16, pp. 8900-8910.

Fink, G, Victora, G, Harttgen, K, Vollmer, S, Vidaletti, P & Barros, D 2017, Measuring socioeconomic inequalities with predicted absolute incomes rather than wealth quintiles: a comparative assessment using child stunting data from national surveys, American Journal of Public Health, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 550-555.

Franses, H & de Groot, B 2016, Corruption and inequality of wealth amongst the very rich, Quality & Quantity, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1245-1252.

Gorina, E, Agadjanian, V & Zotova, N 2018, Migrant womens economic success in Russia: objective reality and subjective assessment, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1584-1603.

Hoffmann, R, Hu, Y, de Gelder, R, Menvielle, G, Bopp, M & Mackenbach, P 2016, The impact of increasing income inequalities on educational inequalities in mortality: an analysis of six European countries, International Journal for Equity in Health, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-13.

Fisher, J, Johnson, D, Latner, J, Smeeding, T & Thompson, J 2016, Inequality and mobility using income, consumption, and wealth for the same individuals, The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 44-58.

Kangmennaang, J & Elliott, J 2018, Towards an integrated framework for understanding the links between inequalities and wellbeing of places in low and middle income countries, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 213, pp. 45-53.

Lim, S, Updike, L, Kaldjian, S, Barber, M, Cowling, K, York, H, Friedman, J, Xu, R, Whisnant, L, Taylor, J, Leever, T, Roman, Y, Bryant, F, Dieleman, J, Gakidou, E & Murray, L 2018, Measuring human capital: a systematic analysis of 195 countries and territories, 19902016, The Lancet, vol. 392, no. 10154, pp. 1217-1234.

Marmot, M 2016, Brazil: rapid progress and the challenge of inequality, International Journal for Equity in Health, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 177-183.

Mode, A, Evans, K & Zonderman, B 2016, Race, neighborhood economic status, income inequality and mortality, PLOS ONE, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1-14.

Neumayer, E & Plümper, T 2016, Inequalities of income and inequalities of longevity: a cross-country study, American Journal of Public Health, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 160-165.

Ngamaba, H, Panagioti, M & Armitage, J 2018, Income inequality and subjective well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Quality of Life Research, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 577-596.

Odgers, L & Adler, E 2018, Challenges for low-income children in an era of increasing income inequality, Child Development Perspectives, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 128-133.

Oskrochi, G, Bani-Mustafa, A & Oskrochi, Y 2018, Factors affecting psychological well-being: evidence from two nationally representative surveys, PLOS ONE, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1-14.

Paul, P & Valtonen, H 2016, Inequalities in perceived health in the Russian Federation, 19942012, BMC Public Health, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 165-169.

Ramsey, T, Svider, F & Folbe, J 2017, Health burden and socioeconomic disparities from hearing loss: a global perspective, Otology & Neurotology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 12-16.

Russell, M 2018, Socioeconomic inequality in Russia, Web.

Sui, B, Feng, F & Chang, P 2018, The pioneer evidence of contagious corruption, Quality & Quantity, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 945-968.

Tan, Z, Shi, F, Zhang, H, Li, N, Xu, Y & Liang, Y 2018, Household income, income inequality, and health-related quality of life measured by the EQ-5D in Shaanxi, China: a cross-sectional study, International Journal for Equity in Health, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 32-38.

Thornhill, C & Smirnova, M 2018, Litigation and political transformation: the case of Russia, Theory and Society, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 559-593.

Timonin, S, Danilova, I, Andreev, E & Shkolnikov, M 2017, Recent mortality trend reversal in Russia: are regions following the same tempo?, European Journal of Population, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 733-763.

Toch-Marquardt, M 2017, Does the pattern of occupational class inequalities in self-reported health depend on the choice of survey? A comparative analysis of four surveys and 35 European countries, European Journal of Public Health, vol. 27, pp. 34-39.

Ward, L & Viner, M 2017, The impact of income inequality and national wealth on child and adolescent mortality in low and middle-income countries, BMC Public Health, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 429-433.

Yu, Z & Wang, F 2017, Income inequality and happiness: an inverted u-shaped curve, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, pp. 2052-2058.

Introduction

Governments rely on taxation systems to get adequate financial resources for funding a wide range of public initiatives, expenditures, and projects. Legal mechanisms are usually put in place to identify and punish those who fail to remit their taxes. Citizens can pay taxes in different levels, including purchase of specific products and the amount deducted from their incomes. Unfortunately, the America tax system has a fair share of blame because it is identified as one of the leading factors behind the increasing level of income inequity. While the American tax model is intended to remain progressive, little gains have been recorded so far since the level of tax inequality has remained the same over the years. Evidence-based measures aimed at empowering the disadvantaged members of the society and a widened income tax model will help mitigate this kind of disparity.

History

Taxation has remained a common practice in the United States since the late 18th century. From the period, the new nation would collect taxes from whiskey, imported products, among other times. Other key areas where local leaders and states collected taxes included property, voters, and even commercialized buildings. The passage of the 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution would result in the legalization of what is today known as income tax. During the Civil War era, the government tried the idea by imposing income taxes (Ambrosio 52). The passage of the Tax Reform Act of 1969 would result in the introduction of the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). Such a framework was implemented with the aim of targeting households with high income levels. Unfortunately, the AMT model continues to attract criticism and concerns from different players in the country (Ambrosio 59). Today, taxation has become a wide area with unique policies and guidelines that dictate the way citizens contribute to public projects and governments undertakings.

Americas Tax System

Over the past decades, the American government has promoted and implemented a unique tax system that is identified as progressive in nature. The concept means that the countrys marginal tax is higher than the average rate (Ambrosio 72). The federal system is designed in such a way that it has seven rates spread between 10 and 37 percentages (Palil et al. 192). Income levels below the standard deduction would usually be zero-rated. According to the model, any increase in the recorded income means that the earner will have to suffer higher taxation rates. The promoted structure presents ranges or income brackets whereby the individual will be taxed accordingly. As of 2020, individuals or households with an income of above 518,400 US dollars and couples with 622,050 US dollars will be on the top rate or bracket (How do Taxes affect Income Inequality?). The government has also put in place mechanisms for ensuring that tax brackets remain revised annually depending on the level of inflation.

Effects on Income and Income Inequality

Many analysts and scholars acknowledge that income inequality is a reality affecting the American society. Within the past four decades, the country income inequality has been rising steadily. Palil et al. reveal that a few percentage of the population get over half of the total income in the country (193). For instance, a report by Nallareddy et al. revealed that around 20 percent of the countrys population with increased income levels shared over 50 percent of the countrys labor patterns, capital income, and government-related insurance benefits, include Medicare and Social Security (5).

Just like many other nations across the globe, the United States has continued to grapple with the rising level of wealth and income inequalities. This trend could be attributable to a number of factors, such as racial imbalances, prejudices, and poor distribution of resources. The measures and initiatives the government puts in place could also be linked to some of the trends recorded in the country (Martorano 258). Over the years, experts have been interested and willing to complete additional studies in an effort to analyze the nature of income taxes and how they contribute to income inequalities. The presented findings and observations have shed more light that could help address the situation in the future and transform the experiences of more people.

In theory, the American progressive taxation framework has been designed in such a way that it could help reduce income disparities and transform the lives and experiences of more citizens. However, the tax cuts introduced by Barack Obama and George Bush regimes resumed in shrinking figures. The new figures would only have equalizing implications on both the income inequality and the recorded taxes. Using the famous Gini index, it would be agreeable that the taxation model has played a recognizable role in helping reduce the overall level of income inequality in the country.

The Gini index is capable of guiding analysts and economists to measure the gap between the after-tax income index and the one for before-tax. The resultant figure will dictate how taxes will help minimize the level of inequality. When the differences are higher, it becomes clear that the imposition of income tax will help equalize the overall level of income. However, while federal taxes became progressive beginning in the 1990s, the level of after-tax and before-tax figure widened the level of income inequality (Biswas et al. 706). Consequently, many experts would acknowledge that the level of inequality has reverted to the figures this country recorded before the 1980s (Martorano 260). This outcome means that the level of income has continued to become diverse, thereby exposing the recorded level of inequality.

From this kind of description, it would be agreeable that the recorded income inequality in the United States has continued to increase sharply within the past four decades. This trend has become noticeable despite the measures the federal government has been putting in place. The foundational theory was that individuals who were earning higher salaries and incomes would be paying increased taxes (Biswas et al. 694). Consequently, the practice would maximize chances of minimizing the rate of income inequality and make it possible for most of the underpaid citizens to lead high-quality lives and pursue their goals. Unfortunately, the mitigating implications of the countrys taxation system has done very little to address the situation. The reality is that the country has continued to grapple with the problem of income inequality just as it did before the 1970s (Schlozman et al. 101). The measures put in place have proved to be counterproductive and incapable of transforming the experiences and lives of more people.

From this analysis, it would be agreeable that the country has not recorded significant gains in averting income disparity through the taxation policies put in place. The level of inequality for after-tax income has continued to rise as the same for the before-tax salary (Schlozman et al. 102). Those who are earning little income will suffer the same challenges their counterparts encountered in the last century. From these recorded trends, it becomes quite clear that taxes have failed in offsetting the recorded level of income inequality. Additionally, it would be correct to indicate that the taxation policies put in place have not triggered increasing levels of inequality. The reality is that the country will continue to experience increasing levels of inequalities unless proper measures are put in place.

Difference of Taxes: Division

The first unique element within the countrys tax system is that of corporate income. Just like in the first case, a progressive model is put in place whereby burden is attributed on income from various investments, capital gains, and dividends (Biswas et al. 696). Estate tax forms the third attribute whereby specific families with higher wealth levels. The interpretation is that individuals with high income might have higher chances of having estates that will have to attract specific tax. In such a case, the model will be targeting households with the highest levels of income.

Payroll taxes, on the other hand, could be described as retrogressive in nature. However, individuals will be required to remit taxes for amounts not exceeding 137,700 US dollars (How do Taxes affect Income Inequality?). The interpretation is that some of the wealthy people might be getting their resources from dividends and other forms of capital gains. In such a scenario, such gains would not be subjected to this kind of taxation. From this analysis, it would be agreeable that such taxes are progressive bellow the identified 137,700 US dollars mark (How do Taxes affect Income Inequality?). Finally, the taxation system provides room for excise taxes whereby specific services and products will have to be purchased at a specific value. In such a case, families and individuals consuming some of the taxed products will be overburdened in comparison with the other members of the public. The price effect of this form of tax presents a regressive model or situation.

These types of taxes are implemented and levied on specified parameters, including personal income, corporate, and products or services. While the American tax model is intended to be progressive in nature, a number of concerns have emerged that are directly linked to the challenge of income inequality. For income tax, the belief has been that the less fortunate or persons with limited salaries will only be required to pay reduced taxes directly. However, the model has created additional divisions that are directly linked to the problem of both indirect and direct taxes (Biswas et al. 707). For trade or sales taxes, the poor and the rich will be compelled to purchase and utilize the same products. The end result is that the poor will be compelled to pay for the same taxes as the rich. Consequently, the poor will be overburdened in comparison with the rich, thereby increasing chances of income disparity.

The nature of excise taxes could be a leading factor in the nature of recorded inequalities in the country. However, it would be impossible for the government to consider superior models that could make such taxes more progressive and incapable of affecting those in lower income categories (Ambrosio 42). Similarly, corporate and income taxes are common in the country and allow create avenues and opportunities for the wealthy to continue recording increased profits. This model means that cases of inequality have continued to increase, thereby making it impossible for them to record the relevant social mobilities.

Within the wider taxation system are social expenditure models. Such strategies are designed in such a way that they can identify individuals who are poor and transform their experiences. The government would consider the use of taxation to meet the demands of the less fortunate and raise adequate funds. However, the inability of the tax system to reduce the level of inequality has only complicated the situation (Saez and Zucman 59). As described earlier, persons with increasing salaries and corporate income levels have continued to get the lions share in social security and health programs.

These measures of division are pursued with the aim of reducing income inequality while funding public resources. Unfortunately, the poor have continued to become poorer since all taxes that are intended to remain progressive have only created additional options for worsening the situation for the less fortunate. Each identified taxation approach continues to present unique challenges that all stakeholders should examine and analyze from an informed perspective (Biswas et al. 698). The ultimate aim should be to address the situation and take more people closer to their goals.

Tax Evasion Methods

Tax evasion remains an illegal practice recorded in many countries, including the United States. Wage and salary earners tend to have reduced options or chances of engaging in initiatives that could amount to tax evasion. For business owners, this challenge remains common because the professionals can consider some of the existing loopholes to avoid tax (Saez and Zucman 35). The first type of tax evasion is that of omitting or underreporting a specific amount of income. A good example in the American setting would be for a specific investor failing to disclose the amount of proceeds recorded from commercial buildings.

The second form of tax evasion reported in different case studies is when some individuals decide to make inaccurate entries in their record books. In some cases, the businesspeople might keep different books of entry, thereby contributing to irregularities. This behavior of keeping records that would be identified as inadequate would result in altered figures, thereby resulting in a fraud (Technology Tools to Tackle 6). The third form of evasion would be when a specific individual decides to claim deductions that are false or inaccurate depending on the final outcome. Some unique examples could include providing salaries or wages to persons who might not have completed the outlined jobs or having charitable reductions that are hard to substantiate.

The fourth type of tax evasion reporting in this country would be the move to claim that specific personal expenditures are business in nature. This kind of fraud would be common since they are some items that would have both personal and company roles, such as computers. The fifth type usually occurs when individuals decide to hide their income or specific assets (Saez and Zucman 61). This kind of concealment means that the reported funds will not to be taxed appropriately. For instance, a specific employee might only be compelled to have deductibles for a smaller amount of salary.

The sixth type of fraud in taxes occurs when individuals choose to engage in transactions that could be identified as a sham. In such cases, citizens and investors might decide to identify specific transactions differently, thereby making it impossible for officials and auditors to make the relevant adjustments. The nature of these methods reveals that more people in this country would be keen to engage in malpractices that would result in tax evasion (Saez and Zucman 62). The rich are usually keen to consider some of the available options and strategies to evade taxes and eventually benefit themselves.

From this discussion, it is agreeable that a loophole exists whereby some of the rich members of the society could pursue to evade taxes and eventually get an unfair advantage over the less fortunate citizens. This challenge explains why powerful mechanisms have been put in place to identify the culprits and discourage others from promoting the vice (Saez and Zucman 92). Over the years, the IRS has been on the lookout for malpractices and initiatives that many businesspeople pursue in an effort to reduce their taxes or evade completely. Consequently, the apprehended individuals would be compelled to pay such taxes and eventually be convicted accordingly.

Reducing Tax Inequality

Tax inequality stands out as a unique problem many citizens continue to encounter in the United States. Unfortunately, most of the taxation measures put in place have done very little to address the recorded economic disparities. The outlined taxation brackets for income tax have only helped maintain the status quo. The outstanding fact is the system has compelled more citizens to spend more income on excise tax just as the rich members of the society (Shafer et al. 8029). This reality explains why a paradigm shift would be necessary to fix or reduce the current level of inequality.

The first recommendation would be for the government to introduce new policies that approach this predicament from an economic perspective. Specifically, leaders can focus on additional incentives that have the potential to maximize the current minimum wage. This strategy means that more people will be empowered and capable of affording basic and secondary items (Biswas et al. 708). This approach could be coupled with additional measures to provide high-quality education to citizens who have been underrepresented over the years. Such a strategy will make it possible for the government to record positive economic results.

The second proposal is for the country to consider an expanded income tax framework. This initiative means that the government will earn additional revenues that could be used to uplift more people by providing incentives and empowering them to overcome the challenge of poverty. Such resources could also be delivered to empowered the less fortunate members of the American society and provide additional employment opportunities (Schlozman et al. 102). The same finances could be utilized to promote and implement new incentives that can address some of the key issues contribution to inequality in the country. Some of them include poverty, lack of resources, and systemic inequality. The consideration of these efforts will help transform the country and pave way for a superior tax system that resonates with the demands of the greatest number of citizens.

Conclusion

The above discussion has identified several taxes that form the basis of the American tax model. From a theoretical perspective, the system was designed in such a way that it remained progressive and capable of empowering more people to record positive experiences. However, little gains have been recorded so far since inequality has remained unchanged since the 1980s. In conclusion, evidence-based measures are needed to empower all disadvantaged members and introduce a widened income tax.

Works Cited

Ambrosio, Fabio. Principles of Taxation in the United States: Theory, Policy, and Practice. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Biswas, Siddhartha, et al. Income Inequality, Tax Policy, and Economic Growth. The Economic Journal, vol. 127, no. 601, 2017, pp. 688-727.

How do Taxes affect Income Inequality? Tax Policy Center, 2020, Web.

Martorano, Bruno. Taxation and Inequality in Developing Countries: Lessons from the Recent Experience of Latin America. Journal of International Development, vol. 30, no. 1, 2018, pp. 256-273.

Nallareddy, Suresh, et al. Corporate Tax Cuts Increase Income Inequality. Harvard Business School, 2018.

Palil, Mohd R., et al. Issues, Challenges and Problems with Tax Evasion: The Institutional Factors Approach. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, vol. 18, no. 2, 2016, pp. 187-206.

Saez, Emmanuel, and Gabriel Zucman. The Triumph of Injustice: How the Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make them Pay. W. W. Norton, 2020.

Schlozman, Kay L., et al. Growing Economic Inequality and Its (Partially) Political Roots. Religions, vol. 8, no. 55, 2018, pp. 97-113.

Shafer, William E., et al. Support for Economic Inequality and Tax Evasion. Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 19, 2020, pp. 8025-8042.

Technology Tools to Tackle Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud. OECD, 2017.

Multiple higher-level professionals such as researchers, politicians and scholars have debated with either each other on the topic on whether that an individual’s socio-economic status, may affect his or her education and lifestyle negatively. This research essay will provide evidence that there is a clear distinction and negative outcome for people who are thought/ considered to be part of the lower social class. These effects lead to life effecting outcomes such as: their poor time managing lifestyles/skills, their own educational intellect and attainment ability as well as the social theory that may be linked to such reasons. Furthermore, we will also compare the level of intellect of students from low social class to those that range from middle to high class families. This paper will also point out the varying and growing strategies that the Australian government is attempting to combat by reducing and preventing these links from being further created, in order to break this cycle.

According to Connell, young children/students that are categorized in the lower socio-economic families have both difficulty and decreased ability to absorb and process new information that is presented to them. This has led to various studies and claims that have shown that students that have come from low social class families are graded worse on average in comparison to middle and high class. There are multiple reasons for this ongoing trend, such as: the family’s belief of the importance for education, accessibility levels to receive updated information and assistance to help with homework/ assessments, and their availability or time effective skills that allows them to not worry about external factors; primarily financial (Devlin, Kift, Nelson, Smith & McKay, 2012). Primarily focused on the later reason of ‘poor time skills’ which is heavily influenced by the parents, and even the child, to work for further house income as financial stress is the leading factor in majority of families in first-second world countries with negative implications (Devlin, McKay, 2017) .

In this case, Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Theory stands out to be the most insightful and answering theory as to show why/how this cycle of negative can affect an individual. In this particular case, looking at the interaction of the Microsystems, Mesosystems and Exosystems on an individual. The microsystem looks at the individuals immediate/direct surroundings only in singular such as only their family, their school, who they interact with. The Mesosystem looks at interconnections among either two or more microsystem factors and sees the connection on how it affects the person. Finally, the Exosystems look at indirect effects that may influence and individual or others. In this instance by going off by what Devlin and co have stated, it will be a child’s living conditions at home and their parents ideas/culture effect poorly on how the child then sees the importance of education and learning at school. This is also stacked on top with the indirect pressure of financial stress that the child may face as parents’ concerns are primarily focused elsewhere.

Understanding and working to reduce social class inequality in education is very important as it helps both the individual students for their future, but most importantly, increasing sustainable national economic growth. Higher overall levels of education within a population:

• Reduce dependency on social welfare
• Are associated with better health outcomes and higher levels of institutional trust and civic cooperation and lower levels of crime and imprisonment
• Contribute to greater efficiency in personal consumer and investment behaviour
• Lead to greater investment in the human capital of each child and higher levels of participation in the paid labour force
• Encourage business innovation that depends on knowledge and literacy and institutional trust
• Support democracy and may lead to better public policy later. (Hanushek, 2009)

According to Hanushek and Woessmann (2010) study, in order for such economic growth to occur there must be a raised quality standard in both the teaching skill level and the average performance. Teaching skill level refers to the ability a teacher has in order to connect and most effectively educate students through various teaching means and strategies to benefit all at an equal and fair rate. Successively teaching all students across the board as such, will as a result, improve upon the average performance of their educational achievements. In Australia, the Productivity Commission highly regards the awareness of educational achievements very important as the improvement in literacy and numeracy skills will help raise both productivity and participation in Australia. As a result, with such improvements made to early and higher educational systems, increase in literacy and numeracy could raise Australia’s aggregate labour productivity up to 1.2% in 2030. Hence, this creates an increase to Australia’s economic growth whilst equally as important, reduces inequality within the schooling system between various SES class students (Aus Gov, 2010).

Through improvements via investments in the early and higher educational systems in both government and non-government schools, there has become a growing rise in equity amongst all students. This is evident as the increase of quality outcomes through better facilitation and focus on certain investments make the greatest contribution to achieving equity. These focused investments are:

• Early school intervention
• Teacher quality; as they are the most in-school influencing factor on students
• School-related factors; the environment they are in and how to better themselves
• System-related factors; how staffing can respond to students needs and meeting parental expectations
• Educational strategies targeted; evidence-based work that helps educate certain students to prevent fall back (Aus Gov, 2010).

Attempts to improve upon these also come at a higher cost in order to obtain higher standard levels. As a result, this has led to both state and national levels of government creating school funding policies in order to assist with: cost and resources, improve quality and equity for all students in both schooling sectors, and long term create economic growth. In doing so, non-government schools provide better return on these government funding investments by contributing to national growth and productivity in comparison to that of the government schools. Nonetheless though, there is still inequality in the approach of the funding of schools on government levels as well.

According to ABCNews, a journal article “To reduce inequality in Australian schools, make them less socially segregated” by Laura Perry, different levels of government and external factors also attribute different amounts of support and income to the various school sectors (Public, Catholic, other Private schools). Per student, Catholic schools receive the least funding surprisingly with $11,204, where most of the support is from Federal Govt with $6,229. Public is closely next with $11,548, the State Govt as main support with $9,200 funding. Whereas other private school students are shown to have total funding of $16,235 with private sources as main contributor of $9,437 and Federal Govt with $4,933. It is highly important to note that private source income support though is vastly different, where Public receive only $680 compared to Catholic schools which give $2,918. These two figures demonstrate that the students that go to Catholic schools are more likely to come from families that can better support their children through income in comparison to Public schools. This is safe to assume that this is due to the social class standings of what their parents do for work and what level they are in. In this instance, Public is lower SES whereas Catholic is middle to high. This becomes evident how much SES factors also attribute to the likelihood of a student being able to attain higher education and achievement goals/benefits in the future. This is shown how different SES students stand in comparison to other classes through the measurement of NAPLAN. It is shown that those who come from low educated parents/low SES are behind by two and a half years in education and when it comes to year 9, that gap becomes wider with up to 4 years difference, compared to those who live in a high SES or have parents that had higher education.

In conclusion, governments and schools are assisting with support and resource input to allow a majority of students to receive the chance to have an equal and fair education. Unfortunately, there are large negative impacts that do occur today when a student that comes from an already disadvantaged/low SES family, that will most likely carry on and affect their ability to be educated and likelihood of obtaining a higher earning job in the future.

References:

1. ABCNews, 20th April, 2018, “To reduce inequality in Australian Schools, make them less socially segregated”. By Laura Perry, The Conversation. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-20/inequality-in-australian-schools-ses-resources-poverty-ceda/9679028 [bookmark: _Hlk19447332]
2. Australian Government Review of Funding for Schooling, (2010). Discussion Paper, April, Canberra: Australian Government
3. Australian Government Review of Funding for Schooling, (2010). Emerging Issues, April, Canberra: Australian Government
4. Connell, R., Welch, A., Vickers, M., Foley, D., Bagnall, N., Hayes, D., Proctor, H., Sriprikash, A. & Campbell, C. (2013). Education, change and society (3rd ed.). Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press
5. Devlin, M., Kift, S., Nelson, K., Smith, L., & McKay, J. (2012). Effective teaching and support of students from low socioeconomic status backgrounds: Practical advice for teaching sta. Sydney. Retrieved from http://www.lowses.edu.au/
6. Devlin, M., & McKay, J. (2017). FACILITATING SUCCESS FOR STUDENTS FROM LOW SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS BACKGROUNDS AT REGIONAL UNIVERSITIES. Retrieved from http://federation.edu.au
7. Hanushek, E. (2009) “School Policy: Implications of Recent Research for Human Capital Investmentsin South Asia and Other Developing Countries,” Education Economics, Vol17, No 3, September, 291-313
8. Hanushek, E., Woessmann, L. (14, August,2009). Poor Student Learning explains the Latin American growth puzzle, Vox Research-based policy analysis and commentary from leading economists, www.voxeu.org
9. Nolan, A., & Raban, B. (2015). Theories into Practice: Understanding and Rethinking Our Work with Young Children. Melbourne: Five Senses Education. Retrieved from http://www.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/shop/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/SUND606_sample.pdf

Introduction

The issue of racism had been discussed and seen through institutions throughout the years. Some of these include, schools, the media, entertainment and more currently in social media platforms. Racism is defined by philosophers as the belief that human beings are biologically divided into different races. Even though many people would like to believe it is no longer an issue, this is simply not the case. The fact there is still evident racial inequalities in the 21st century goes to show the magnitude of the problem. The school systems have faced a lot of this problem firsthand. Students in minority schools continue struggle while students in white schools continue to excel (Noguera 2017). Racial inequality is a problem that needs to be addressed particularly in the United States, as we see it very often. African American and Hispanics face a higher possibility of not attaining the same level of education as white kids. Racial inequality is a serious issue that needs more attention. Although many administrations and legislators have attempted to deter this problem it has not proven effective. Due to underlying issues such as economic and social disparities make it challenging. Racial inequality rather than decrease and subside, has increased and gotten worse than before.

According to data collected by the Civil Rights data collection, between 2015 and 2016, more than 96,000 minority schools were facing investigations due to racial inequality. The white students from these elementary schools face less harsh punishments compared to black and Hispanic students (Noguera, 2017). Controlling racial inequality, which is a national issue, would help to improve the academic performance of children in schools.

The research involved detailed reviews of different scholarly articles that gave an insight into how racial inequality in minority schools affect the education of students. The article used to draw a connection between racial inequality, academic performance, and economic inequality.

The research conducted detailed the impact racial inequality has on the education students receive in minority schools. The articles drew connections between racial inequality and economic and social classes on the academic performance of students. (Quintana & Mahgoub 2016). Segregation of minority schools and lack of funding from the government increases the chances of poor performance among African American students and Hispanic students. The environment lived by the different students also contribute to the academic gap seen between African American students, Hispanic students, and white students. Minority kids in schools have less educational resources because of their social economic status and a long history of inequality.

History of Inequality

The United States has a long and dark history when it comes to racial disparities. Institutional level of racism in educational institutions is a current issue in different countries. The issues, however, began early in the 1960s when the civil rights movement tried to confront institutional racism (Houkamau & Sibley, 2015). Segregation of Schools, churches, courts, and parks was according to race. The white privileges seen in their instructions include well-guarded compounds, while institutions involving people of color we abandoned and less developed. The issue is still a problem in this decade as white-dominated institutions such as schools receive more funding compared to minority schools. The difference in the institutions does not give a fairground for healthy competition among the students (Houkamau & Sibley, 2015). Research conducted in recent years indicate instances of institutional abandonment due to racial inequality.

As earlier mentioned, schools dominated by whites receive funding even during difficult times. The government is confident about the institutions and would, therefore, fund any project. If there is a perception that black students are increasing in schools, the government loses confidence with the institution and, therefore, cuts the budget. If other institutions such as courts do not intervene, the institutions are left to collapse as students suffer. Black and Hispanic school systems have experienced similar issues, while white-dominated schools with fewer students are left to prosper. Despite the economic development and prosperity, especially in developed countries, issues of funding minority schools are still debated. We would think that multiculturalism and diversity have helped to eliminate racism, but that is not the case. Bowser argues that the issue of racism began back when slavery was part of the culture of many nations. The origin of individual racism was as a result of social racism against people of color (Houkamau & Sibley, 2015). There exists a relationship between cultural racism, institutional racism, and individual racism.

Racial Inequality Impact on Education

Research indicates that teachers, especially in elementary schools, are biased, depending on the religion, social class, or race of the students. The difference in behavior demonstrated by teacher’s results in racial disparities, seen in how students behave around one another (Warikoo et al., 2016). Research done by Tenenbaum and Ruck (2017) indicated that teachers tend to be more vigorous while addressing African American and Hispanic students, compared to how they address white students. White students are considered braver and smarter compared to students of color. Appiah, a philosopher, claims that extrinsic racism is what brings about ethnic issues in our societies. He explains that extrinsic racism occurs when an individual believes that all individuals of a race share an inherited characteristic.

An extrinsic racist believes that some people, based on their race, are more intelligent, more industrious, kind, smart, courageous, and trustworthy than people from other races. Unfortunately, students in elementary schools observe these differences and begin to question the issue of racism at a very tender age. Traumatizing incidents, such as bullying, may affect the mental health of the affected student. Most public elementary schools are dominated by people of color and are often neglected or are under poor conditions. Poverty levels increased drastically during the Great Recisson of 2008 and because of it, the percentage of children coming from families in poverty went up to 22% (Putnam 2015). Now, approximately 52% of students come from low income families, the highest percentage recorded by The National Center for Education (Noguera, 2017).

School Segregation and Academic Gap

Research conducted by Reardon (2016) indicates the effects of segregation on the academic performance of students. Segregation in elementary schools causes a huge academic gap between the privileged white and the less privileged Black and Hispanic students. It was evident that segregation and inequality is a major known issue that affects academic performance. As the economic gap increases between different social classes, racial inequality also increases (Reardon, 2016). Lack of funding from the local and national governments has also resulted in more incidences of racial inequality. Civil rights groups reported the challenges that the minority have in accessing educational facilities (Noguera, 2017). The difference in academic performance between the minority schools and free schools is accounted for by a lack of concern from the national government. In areas where African American students and Hispanic students live, they are less developed, which affects their academic performance.

Underfunding is a significant issue that the government should address. According to Kochhar & Fry (2014), there is a close relationship between racial inequality, economic inequality, and academic performance. Most of the immigrants living in the United States are forced to attend public schools due to the low income earned (Noguera, 2017). Overcrowding in the schools makes it hard for the management team to accommodate all students adequately. Despite the increase in students in public schools, funding from the government it still limited. Unfortunately, the white-dominated schools with fewer students receive more money, which is used to develop new facilities, resulting in better academic performance. Racism in segregated schools affects not only the students but the morale of the teachers (Reardon, 2016).

Coleman researched in the United States following complaints of school segregation. The findings from the research were alarming. More than 90% of the black students attended educational institutions that were dominated by blacks, while 90-100% of white students attended white-dominated educational institutions (Quintana & Mahgoub, 2016). The academic gap between these institutions was a significant concern. The performance in the minority schools was lower compared to white-dominated schools. The facilities used in the minority schools were poorly maintained and were fewer compared to those in other communities. The research by Coleman also indicated the adverse effects of socioeconomic inequality, which contributed to segregation in the schools.

Segregation in school systems, for example, leads to racial gaps since the quality of education and racial composition are positively correlated. As earlier discussed, there is a vast difference between schools dominated Whites and those dominated by Black and Hispanic students. Residential segregation, which is the environment where children live, also impacts their academic performances (Quintana & Mahgoub, 2016). Research indicates that most black students in elementary schools come from an insecure neighborhood, which makes it more difficult for them to study. The white students mainly come from the suburbs and can study in their homes. The difference between the two environments affects academic performance. There is a connection between social economic status and achievement gaps (Quintana & Mahgoub, 2016). Segregation in schools also affects the turnover of teachers. It is challenging to attract and retain highly qualified teachers in minority schools because of the low salaries. Insecurity in residential segregation also affects the turnover of teachers, thus, affecting the academic performance of students.

School-Based Racial Discrimination

The most affected individuals in school-based racial discrimination are mainly African American students. Byrd (2015) Those students affected by racial disparities in schools resulted with low self-esteem issues and poor performance (Banerjee et al., 2018). African American students move from one school to another, increasing the chances of unfairness and discrimination based on their race. According to Benner and Graham (2013), there is an association between racial discrimination in elementary school and discrimination from teachers and peers. To understand how these racial disparities, continue to prevail in society, techniques such as Implicit Association Tests are used to show the perception and prejudice of people based on their race. Explicit attitudes are the beliefs about a race and can often be expressed in writing or during oral communication (Warikoo et al., 2016). Implicit attitudes, on the other hand, are involuntary actions, mainly as a result of prejudice. Teachers often display implicit attitudes when addressing students of color. Adverse effects of implicit attitudes towards students of color affect their ability to learn as other white students (Warikoo et al., 2016). Students that are bullied often become insecure about themselves and unsafe in schools. Children that face such kinds of discrimination develop psychological problems that may affect them in the present and future. Discrimination from teachers and peers’ results in a lack of concentration in class, resulting in poor academic performance. Research done by Medvedeva (2010) found that immigrant elementary students who have been discriminated against develop poor communication skills and learn slowly compared to other students (Banerjee et al., 2018).

Why is it still an issue?

The critical race theory, popularized by Kimberle Crenshaw and Derrick empathized that despite the civil rights movements, the lives of colored people had not improved. The theory notes that racism is embedded into American society. Race continues to be a subject matter on a global scale, and racism continues to affect the people of the color adversely (Ladson-Billings & Tate, 2016). Given its history of slave, race, and racism, the United States has often been used and singled out for analysis using this theory. Some sociologists and philosophers today argue that the issue and instances of racism have decreased in recent years compared to how it was in the 18th and 19th Centuries. The theory explains the marginalization and segregation of different institutions, including educational institutions. Educational policies have often affected people of color negatively (Ladson-Billings & Tate, 2016). According to Delgado, the tenets of critical theory are essential due to the educational system of the United States.

Conclusion

The issue of racial inequality in minority schools significantly affects the academic performance of students in elementary. Other contributing factors, such as socioeconomic inequality, also affect students who are African American or Hispanic. Addressing the segregation of schools is vital as it affects the education of students. Racism at the institutional level has increased in recent years. Students are no longer treated in the same way at schools. Educational institutions where the majority are whites are likely to receive more funding and prioritized as opposed to those who have students who are African American. The white communities have better facilities compared to people of color. Racism has many negative impacts, on various aspects of society.

Institutional racism has been essential in facilitating the increase of white dominance and white privilege. Institutional racism is responsible for the reinforcement of both cultural and individual racism. Racial discrimination has often resulted in mental health issues. Children who have experienced discrimination lose their confidence and are often sad, which may lead to depression. Such children have a low concentration in class, which often results in low performance.

People in the United States and around the world are watching athletes’ performance in various sports. Both male and female athletes compete at an incredible level that requires physical fitness and drive. As we all know, professional athletes can earn salaries reflecting their talent and ability. After the Woman’s World Cup in football there was a surge of newfound fame that happened to Women’s sports, at least in woman’s football opening the debate should women athletes be paid the same as male athletes in sports. Players from the US women’s national team have went as far as to file a federal class action lawsuit seeking equal pay to their male counterparts.

Some athletes feel women and men who play the same sport should be paid the same, including captain of the American national team Megan Rapinoe who said “I think it’s fair for us to ask that when we play a game, and we win that game or we tie that game or we lose that game, that we should be paid the same as our male counterparts. I don’t think that’s an unrealistic or unreasonable ask, to have equality.” Whereas some feel they shouldn’t, including current rank 1 singles Tennis player Rafael Nadal who said “Female models earn more than male models, and nobody says anything. Why? Because they have a larger following. In tennis too, who gathers a larger audience earns more.” It is a simple fact that men’s sports, for the most part, bring in more revenue. In the eight FIFA World Cup tournaments held on the women’s side, the U.S. women’s team has won four and came in second or third place in the others, and on the men’s side there have been 21 FIFA World Cup tournaments, but the U.S. men’s team did not qualify for about half the tournaments, and the highest they placed was third which was all the way back in 1930. This shows that at a worldwide level the women have a better chance of placing in a higher position than men. When the Wall Street Journal examined the federation’s financial reports, it showed that the U.S. women’s soccer games earned more than the men’s games, in total, during the three years after the women’s team won the World Cup in 2015. especially, from 2016-18, the women’s team brought in $50.8 million in revenue, whereas the men’s team brought in $49.9 million. That’s a difference of less than 2% in the women’s favour, this shows that though it may be a slight difference the women’s National Team are bringing in more revenue outside of the world cup. But that is just women’s football what about the WBNA? It is currently estimated that the WNBA generates approximately $60 million in revenue, while $12.3 million of that revenue is given to its players, that’s about 20% of the league revenue. Whereas the NBA made $7.4 billion in revenue and 53% of the league revenue is guaranteed to go to the players under the 1983 agreement to cap payrolls.

Although women’s sport is starting to gather more media coverage, it could be argued that it is not reaching far enough, but is this the case? In terms of the women’s world cup the peak viewership in America for the 2019 women’s final was 14.3 million compared to the men’s world cup final which peaked at 11.4 million viewers, a 22% US viewership boost. Although you also have to take into account that the men’s US team were not actually playing in the final of the Men’s World Cup. For the WNBA the average viewership in 2018 was 231,000 and the average game attendance was 6768 compared to the NBA which averages 1.28 million viewers and 18,000 in attendance. Although it could be said the WNBA does not get as much viewers as the NBA due to its lack of worldwide coverage, the NBA broadcasts to 96 different countries across 8 continents whereas the WBNA only broadcasts to 24 different countries. It could be said that if the WBNA got the same media coverage then they would also start pulling in more viewers that not much different to their male counterparts.

It is an obvious and non-deniable fact that women sports aren’t advertised or sponsored as much as their male counterparts, but why is this? Some sponsorship deals have been on the rise, which indicates that real change is happening and will continue to do so in the coming years. And, in the current political climate, it makes sense that this change would happen sooner rather than later. The bottom line is that the media needs to take more action to support women’s sport in order to encourage sponsors to invest in them. Although there is an abundance of woman athletes out there, there is a serious lack of representation of these women and their sports in the media. Popularity for woman’s sports among fans is increasing at an incredible rate. For example, the 5,000 tickets appointed to the Wales vs. England game for the Women’s Football World Cup on 31 August 2019 sold out in just 24 hours. In addition, The Football Association announced that it is likely to double the number of players and fans by 2020. Despite the clear evidence that women’s sport is prospering in terms of success and popularity, it only gathers a disappointing 1% of the sponsorship market. According to research conducted by Nielsen, just 3% of print and 4% of online coverage goes to women’s only sport and less than 20% of all TV sport covers women only or mixed sports.

Are men and women equal in terms of skill? It is an opinion-based question and it depends on who you ask. The majority of woman will probably say they are equal or better and men will most likely say they are better due to strength, speed, height etc. But there are cases of men being better than woman in sport. For example, the world cup winners USWNT were dealt an embarrassing blow from the Dallas under 15s boys’ team when they were beat 5-2. Also a powerlifter named Jaycee Cooper set a new state record in Bench, becoming state champion, and winning best overall lifter. This was in the women’s division at the USPA Minnesota State Championships. Cooper, who was born male, but now identifies as a woman, lifted 57.5kg more than the closest female competitor. At the 2016 Olympics the fastest competitor in the men’s 100 metre dash was Usain Bolt with a time of 9.81 seconds and the time for the fastest competitor in the women’s 100 metre dash was Elaine Thompson with a time of 10.71 seconds. The women’s world record for the 100-metre dash is 10.49 seconds this was set in 1988 by Florence Griffith Joyner and hasn’t been beaten since, whereas the world record for the men’s 100 metre dash is 9.58 seconds which was set in 2009 by Usain Bolt

In conclusion women shouldn’t get equal pay in sports just yet. If you are just looking in terms of the American women’s national team then many would say yes to equal pay, but you also have to take into account other sports. The revenue in other sports are too great a difference, worldwide coverage doesn’t have as far as a reach as men’s do, lack of representation in sponsorships and difference in physical capabilities. If women get all these things, then equal pay will be within their grasp but until then they will be fighting a losing battle.

We all have dreams, some are good and some are bad, but beyond that, they’re something we want in life or are afraid of, one of the most powerful dreams in history was the dream of equality. The foundation of the United States is based on the premise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Throughout the history of the United States, racial equality has been an. Until the rise of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. who was able to skyrocket the advancements of the Civil Rights Movement through his, I Have a Dream and I’ve Been to the Mountaintop speeches along with his Letter from a Birmingham Jail. During his time he leads the Civil Rights Movement, helped end racial discrimination, and helped in gaining equal rights protected by federal law. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is one of the most influential activists in American history who was able to bring equality to the U.S through the methods of his speeches, nonviolence protests, and consistent activism.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was born on January 15th, 1929, and was assassinated on April 4th, 1968. “His leadership was fundamental to that movement’s success in ending the legal segregation of African Americans in the South and other parts of the United States” (Carson). Dr. King came from a large family of pastors starting with his grandfather, his father and later becoming one himself. “Martin Luther attended segregated public schools in Georgia, graduating from high school at the age of fifteen; he received the B. A. degree in 1948 from Morehouse College…After three years of theological study at Crozer Theological Seminary in Pennsylvania where he was elected president of a predominantly white senior class, he was awarded the B.D. in 1951…With a fellowship won at Crozer, he enrolled in graduate studies at Boston University, completing his residence for the doctorate in 1953 and receiving the degree in 1955” (The Nobel Peace Prize). Dr. King came from a long line of pastors starting his grandfather, his father, and later himself becoming one himself in 1954 at the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Alabama. Dr. King always had a sense of strong civil rights activism growing up he was a member of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. In 1955 he accepted the leadership of the first great Negro nonviolent demonstration during the time of the bus segregation. “King was arrested upwards of twenty times and assaulted at least four times; he was awarded five honorary degrees; was named Man of the Year by Time magazine in 1963, and became not only the symbolic leader of American blacks but also a world figure” (The Nobel Peace Prize).

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.s most powerful and well-known speech is his “ I Have a Dream” speech on August 28th, 1963. The speech took place at the Lincoln Memorial for the 1963 march on Washington for Jobs and Freedom (I Have a Dream). Dr. King opened his speech with “Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation” (I Have a Dream). To connect and show everyone that was watching that at one point in history African Americans were given their freedom in theory giving them equality, but in reality that wasn’t the case.

Dr. King then goes on “But one hundred years later (All right), the Negro still is not free. (My Lord, Yeah) One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. (Hmm) One hundred years later (All right), the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later (My Lord) [applause], the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself in exile in his own land. (Yes, yes) And so we’ve come here today to dramatize a shameful condition” (I Have a Dream).

Showing how much African Americans are discriminated against even after the end of slavery, demanding and pleading for a change in the world. Ending his speech with “I have a dream (Mhm) that one day (Yes) this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed (Hah): “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.” (Yeah, Uh-huh, Hear hear) [applause]…I have a dream (Yeah) [applause] that my four little children (Well) will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. (My Lord) I have a dream today [enthusiastic applause]” (I Have a Dream).

During the time period between the 1950s and 1960s, The United States was separated internally through racial divides that varied from separated schools, bus seats, bathrooms, and restaurants. Dr. King was one to stand up because of the social injustices he experienced growing up and wanted to create a better world for future generations to come where everyone could be equal and not judged on the color of their skin. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “ I Have a Dream” speech is relevant to this day because it and himself were an essential part of the Civil Rights Movement. Without his impact, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 might not have ever been put into action leaving the United States divided to this day.

Dr.Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I’ve Been to the Mountaintop” speech on April 3rd, 1968 in Memphis Tennessee. Dr. King delivered a speech for the sanitation workers on strike, because of the unfair treatment even after the Civil Rights Act of 1964. “The issue is the refusal of Memphis to be fair and honest in its dealings with its public servants, who happen to be sanitation workers. [Applause] Now we’ve got to keep attention on that. (That’s right) That’s always the problem with a little violence. You know what happened the other day, and the press dealt only with the window breaking. (That’s right) I read the articles. They very seldom got around to mentioning the fact that 1,300 sanitation workers are on strike, and that Memphis is not being fair to them, and that Mayor Loeb is in dire need of a doctor. They didn’t get around to that. (Yeah) [Applause]” (I’ve Been on the Mountain).

This is relevant because many during this time were able to accept the fact that they would have to treat African Americans as equals. Creating the stigma that they were nothing, at this point, the debates over equality were mixed so the news wouldn’t then acknowledge the newly illegal mistreatment. This is extremely relevant to today’s society with racial prejudice, especially with the new not giving all details or sides of a story, especially today with police brutality.

Lastly Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.s Letter from a Birmingham Jail on April 16th, 1963. “King’s 12, April 1963 arrest for violating Alabama’s law against mass public demonstrations took place just over a week after the campaign’s commencement” (Letter From a Birmingham Jail). Where his nonviolent approach was mocked and criticized as unwise and untimely and for being an outsider. “Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states. I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (Roy T. Matthews pg.320). During this time in 1963, there was already traction for The Civil Rights Act of 1964 being put into effect. Tensions were extremely high all over the country where many wanted to see the leaders of the movement bested and fail. This is relevant in today’s society as well as similar to recent police brutality protests.

In Dr. King’s speech, he stated “ One may well ask, “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?” The answer is found in the fact that there are two types of laws: there are just and there are unjust laws…two? How does one determine when a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law” (Roy T. Matthews pg.320).

As he states that some laws are just and unjust and need to be fought for change. In today’s society, many do this with police brutality protests they have to make a big enough cry to be heard to gain change while obliging the rules. Dr. King’s influence and mentality of peaceful protests are still used today and are a model of protests for change.

There are some of the most influential events by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. that made him one of the most influential activists in American History. Who was able to break down barriers to create a new society for future generations to come. Through these two speeches and his letter along with all his other endeavors, Dr. King was able to gain nationwide support for his, paired with his non-violent tactics preaching pacifism. Through his methods, he has become a role model for many shaping our society into what it is today thanks to his constant support for equality. Dr. King truly did end racial discrimination having a society today where it is mainly frowned upon now. Where we have him and many others to thank for creating a society that pushes and strives for equality for all rather than going back to these ideals. Where we aren’t judging based on the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

Works Cited

1. Carson, Clayborne, and David L. Lewis. “Martin Luther King, Jr.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 1 May 2019, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Martin-Luther-King-Jr.
2. “‘I Have a Dream,’ Address Delivered at the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom.” The Martin Luther King, Jr., Research and Education Institute, 25 Jan. 2019, https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-papers/documents/i-have-dream-address-delivered-march-washington-jobs-and-freedom.
3. “‘I’ve Been to the Mountaintop,’ Address Delivered at Bishop Charles Mason Temple.” The Martin Luther King, Jr., Research and Education Institute, 23 Apr. 2019, https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-papers/documents/ive-been-mountaintop-address-delivered-bishop-charles-mason-temple.
4. “‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail.’” The Martin Luther King, Jr., Research and Education Institute, 29 May 2019, https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/letter-birmingham-jail.
5. “The Nobel Peace Prize 1964.” NobelPrize.org, https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1964/king/biographical/.
6. “Selection from Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” Experience Humanities: Volume II: The Renaissance to The Present, by Roy T. Matthews et al., McGraw-Hill Education, 2014, pp. 318–322.

The concept of race is a social construct that categorizes people based on physical characteristics such as skin colour, hair texture, and facial features. It has been used throughout history to justify discriminatory practices, including slavery, segregation, and genocide. These practices have impacted the opportunities, experiences, and outcomes of people of colour.

The effects of racial inequality are far-reaching and can be seen in various aspects of life, including the criminal justice system, education, employment, housing, and healthcare. In my essay, I will explore the causes and consequences of racial inequality, and argue that concerted efforts are needed to dismantle systemic racism and promote greater equity and justice for all.

Spheres Of Life Where Racial Inequality Manifests Itself

The Criminal Justice System: A Manifestation Of Racial Inequality

One of the most significant manifestations of racial inequality is in the criminal justice system. Black and brown people are disproportionately represented in prisons and jails, and they are more likely to be arrested, convicted, and sentenced to harsher penalties than white people. This phenomenon, known as racial profiling, is a result of implicit biases and systemic racism within law enforcement agencies and the justice system as a whole.

The war on drugs, for instance, has been shown to disproportionately target communities of colour, despite similar rates of drug use across different racial groups. Mandatory minimum sentencing laws also disproportionately affect people of colour, as they are more likely to be convicted of drug offenses and receive longer sentences. 

Additionally, the school-to-prison pipeline, a phenomenon in which school policies and practices lead to the criminalization of students, has a disproportionate impact on students of color. These policies and practices perpetuate cycles of poverty and trauma, limiting opportunities for people of colour to break free from the criminal justice system and achieve economic and social mobility. 

Educational Inequality: The Persistent Problem Of Racial Disparities

Racial inequality is also evident in the education system. Students of colour are more likely to attend underfunded schools, have lower graduation rates, and have limited access to higher education. 

Similarly, racial inequality in education significantly impacts the overall well-being and success of individuals and communities. Underfunded schools and lack of access to higher education limit opportunities for people of colour to secure well-paying jobs and achieve financial stability. The achievement gap also affects the long-term economic prospects of communities of colour, perpetuating cycles of poverty and economic inequality. 

Additionally, the lack of representation of people of colour in academic and administrative positions perpetuates a system that reinforces inequality and hinders progress towards a more equitable society. 

The Persistent Problem Of Racial Inequality In The Workforce

Another area in which racial inequality is evident is in the workforce. People of colour are more likely to be unemployed, underemployed, or working in low-paying jobs with limited opportunities for advancement. They also face discrimination in hiring, promotion, and salary negotiations, often being paid less than their white counterparts for the same job.

This racial inequality in the workforce can also have a long-lasting impact on individuals and their families. Limited access to well-paying jobs with opportunities for advancement can lead to financial instability, making it challenging to access quality housing, healthcare, and education. Discrimination in hiring and promotion can also limit career development and opportunities, leading to a lifetime of lower earnings and missed opportunities. 

The Impact Of Housing Discrimination On Racial Inequality

Housing discrimination is another significant issue that contributes to racial inequality. People of colour are more likely to live in impoverished neighbourhoods with limited access to quality housing, healthcare, and other essential services. They are also more likely to face discrimination when trying to rent or buy a home, with landlords and lenders denying them access to housing based on their race.

Furthermore, housing discrimination has a significant impact on the health and well-being of individuals and communities of colour. Living in substandard housing with limited access to essential services can lead to adverse health outcomes, including chronic diseases, mental health issues, and decreased life expectancy. 

Besides, the lack of access to safe and affordable housing can contribute to homelessness, housing insecurity, and displacement. 

Racial Inequality In Healthcare: Disparities And Challenges

Yet, racial inequality is evident in healthcare. People of colour have higher rates of chronic diseases, lower life expectancies, and limited access to quality healthcare services. This phenomenon is a result of both individual and systemic factors, including lack of access to health insurance, cultural barriers to seeking medical care, and disparities in the quality of care received.

These disparities are not the result of individual choices or actions but rather a reflection of systemic racism and discrimination that have been perpetuated for centuries. 

Conclusion

To sum up, racial inequality is a pervasive and persistent issue in many areas of society. To my mind, these disparities result from systemic and individual factors, including implicit biases, discrimination, and institutionalised racism. However, there are solutions to address these issues, such as policy changes to eliminate racial profiling, increased funding for underfunded schools, and efforts to increase diversity in hiring and promotion practices. Nevertheless, we must continue to work towards a future where everyone has equal opportunities and access to resources, regardless of their race or ethnicity.

Introduction

The principle of equality or equity is one basic element in the value of Islam. This estimation of equality is not to be confused with or mistook for indistinguishable quality or stereotype. Islam instructs that in seeing Allah Almighty, all individuals are equivalent, yet they are not really identical. There is difference of capacities, ambitions, potential, riches, and so on.

The limitations in these models are common. The social limitations are those forced by society because of experience and practice; in the last investigation, they are scholarly attitudes identified with the recently referenced attributes. There is, for instance, the set up contrast between the ignorant and the educated. Nobody would allot significant obligations that are essential to the network to an ignorant individual.

However, none of these differences can by themselves builds up the status of prevalence of one man or race over another. The load of man, the color of his skin, and the measure of riches he has and the level of esteem he appreciates make little difference to the personality and character of the person to the extent Allah is concerned. The main refinement, which Allah perceives is the qualification in piety; the main rule which Allah applies, is the foundation of goodness and spiritual perfection.

This is to state that in Islam, no nation is made to be above different nations or to transcend them. Man’s value according to men and according to Allah is controlled by the great he does, and by his submission to Allah.

The differences of race, color or economic well-being are just accidental. They don’t influence the genuine stature of man in sight of Allah. Once more, the estimation of equality is not just an issue of sacred rights or the understanding of aristocrats or deigning philanthropy. It is an article of faith, which the Muslim pays attention to and to which he should follow truly. The establishments of this Islamic estimation of balance are profoundly established in the structure of Islam.

The right to equality in Islam “human right and Islam”

It is all around acknowledged that Islam agrees balance of status and rights to every human individual, independent of their inception or association. The pride that God has presented on people as guaranteed in the Quran is general, not limited to male individuals from the Muslim Ummah. Quran’s accentuation on Adam and Eve being the basic ancestor of all humanity, ties people groups all things considered, clans and networks and nationalities together in friendly relations. The essential principle of the human rights belief system that ‘every person are brought into the world free and equivalent in nobility and rights. They are blessed with reason and soul and should act towards each other in a soul of fraternity’ in this manner gets completely confirmed by the Quran and the Prophet’s goodbye message from Jabal-I-Rahmah in Arafat.

In any case, the Quran does perceive and approve the presence of collectivities like clans and networks, sharing basic highlights that fill the need of gathering’s socio-social attachment, however not really comprising the premise of free political elements. Islam rejects intensely any case to prevalence or mediocrity by birth or by goodness of having a place with any race, ethnic gathering, class, standing or religious overlay or sexual orientation. Despite the fact that inflexible in attesting the total verity of the essential precepts of Tawheed and Hereafter and individual human responsibility to God, the Quran unequivocally submits the Prophet and Muslims to perceive the privilege to rise to opportunity of still, small voice to all people.

The issue of fairness of status and privileges of ladies and of non-Muslims and dissidents has, in any case, been hazardous in Muslim social orders and nations past just as present. To comprehend the issue logically, one needs to consider the way that the worth course of Islam under God’s Revelation needed to manage time-space bound social-social specificities of the primary addressees and in this manner of different people groups and civic establishments. The conspicuous case of the status of ‘slave’ and ‘subjection’ during the Prophet’s time is illustrative of the tradeoff between the Islamic perfect and the genuine, which should cause us to yield the likelihood of advancement and advancement in acknowledgment of the estimation of equity.

Women status and rights as human people and vicegerent of God on earth are equivalent to those of men. The exception from specific ceremonies during specific periods, similar to feminine cycle, is no indication of her inalienable incapacity. It is simply part of God’s Will for ladies, which she needs to comply. In the event that the lady imagining the human kid in her belly and male insufficiency to do as such does not render guys inalienably debilitated and sub-par compared to ladies, men can’t guarantee any prevalence as such. Despite what might be expected it is mother-hood which is lifted up far higher than parenthood in Islam. To get from natural separation of jobs of people any separation in common, political and social, monetary, and social rights can be followed not to the Quran but rather to male focused and domineering man centric social structures, which were widespread notwithstanding during the early time of Islam. It is this inclination of preservationist Muslims to glorify even the social practices of early time of Islam which causes Indian Muslims to think about that the more they rough to Taliban model the more genuine Muslims they would be. It is well that the Iranian Islamic researchers and the Revolutionary Iranian system and Shias have been for the most part experts of the fair way in connection to ladies’ rights.

Racial equality in Islam

One of the most uncommon sights Muslims see after visiting the heavenly city of Mecca during the hajj journey, or to be sure any of the other Islamic sacred destinations in the bigger Middle Eastern district, isn’t only the blessed locales themselves, yet in the strong decent variety of the explorers who visit them. It is entirely expected to hear in the report about the great many travelers who play out the hajj every year or the millions more who visit the blessed city of Karbala during the events of Ashura or Arbaeen. What the media in some cases disregards is the essences of those pioneers. A more critical look will uncover numerous particular skin hues, races, and ethnicities. These are individuals who originated from nations everywhere throughout the world, talking various dialects. Be that as it may, in seeing the devotees, they are every one of the one individual and they are no different. God states in the heavenly Quran,

Individuals, we have made all of you male and female and have made you countries and clans so you would [know] one another. The most decent among you in seeing God is the most devout of you. God is All-knowing and All-mindful.

The equality between men and women in Islam

The previously mentioned stanza starts with a noteworthy direction that calls people to remain commonly strong through an otherworldly, enthusiastic and companionate partnership dependent on normal faith in God and His Prophet. It is a kind affiliation that is depicted in words like awliya – partners of each other – where one sees this subliminal closeness among people whereby one is a piece of the other in fellowship and agreement.

This wilayah that joins hearts and activities is just the successful assent of sexual orientation fairness. This equity interprets, in regular daily existence, into solid activities and demonstrations of human solidarity, where the main rule for assessing each other is honesty and good integrity.

These ideas, evident as they seem to be, can’t be found in most customary exposition, where we see that this stanza has been tragically skimmed and translated rather freely. To be sure, this unmistakable, even verifiable urging to correspondence among people, particularly in the administration of general society or socio-political circles, is for all intents and purposes missing from the traditional analyses.

The facts demonstrate that, by and large, old style and customary analysis acknowledges a specific otherworldly uniformity among people as an establishment of Islam. This otherworldly balance depends basically on the act of love and on remunerations and disciplines in the great beyond. However, this is the main uniformity that is perceived, since most observers attempt to locate a religious trade off between sexual orientation balance in love practices and conventional sex pecking order and complementarity, which are the standard much of the time. This complementarity has consistently been comprehended as an indication of the old style division of jobs in the family, yet additionally in open life, where ladies were constantly bound to optional, subordinate jobs contrasted with those doled out to men.

Along these lines most researchers have translated this stanza up ’til now another about profound equity, particularly in love (ibadat), not least on the grounds that the remainder of the refrain mentions supplication and almsgiving. However this refrain contains a solution of fundamental significance that establishes its center: the order to charge normal great and dishearten terrible activities, which, we can obviously observe, is a free arrangement that goes before demonstrations of love. At the end of the day, the Qur’an portrays perfect male and female devotees as being, most importantly, individuals who help one another, on equivalent terms, in urging the benefit of all, al ma’ruf and restricting terrible deeds, and afterward individuals who play out their religious ceremonies, salat and zakat, consistently in solidarity and shared solidarity.

Therefore, most of old style hermeneutical writings comprehended the direction to charge the benefit of everyone and restrict malice activities, emphasized a few times in the Qur’an, as a commitment to socio-political activity, officeholder upon the entire of the network or a world class some portion of it, so as to ensure the negligible conditions for social equity and flourishing inside that network.

In any case, it is amazing to find that this equivalent order, when found in the refrain about wilayah and the union among people, does not for the most part offer ascent to similar discourses. Precisely the same detailing in the Qur’an is translated contrastingly when it is routed to people on an equivalent balance. As it were, the point at which the Qur’an approaches adherents, by and large, to watch this directive, as in refrain 3:104, it is comprehended as a remedy concerning ‘men’ just, while every single Muslim researcher are of the assessment that the Qur’an, when utilizing the general term al mu’minun–the devotees – is frequently tending to the two people, and that these urgings concern ladies the same amount of as men. The Qur’an is unambiguous, and pushes insistently this nearby collaboration or wilayah among people in socio-political activity, before summing it up to demonstrations of religious custom. By chance, some contemporary analysts harken back to this unique importance and affirm the remedy of joint socio-political cooperation by the two people, as unequivocally supported in the Qur’an.

Conclusion

This is a short sketch of those rights which fourteen hundred years back Islam provided for man, to the individuals who were at war with one another and to the residents of its state, which each adherent sees as consecrated as law.

From one perspective, it invigorates and reinforces our confidence in Islam when we understand that even in this cutting edge age which gains such uproarious cases of ground and edification, the world has not had the option to deliver juster and more impartial laws than those given 1400 years back.

Then again it offends one that Muslims are in control of such an amazing and far reaching arrangement of law but then they search forward for direction to those pioneers of the West who couldn’t have longed for accomplishing those statures of truth and equity which was accomplished quite a while back.