Category: Humanities

Instructions
The Father of Modern Management said that “Strategic Management is

Instructions
The Father of Modern Management said that “Strategic Management is not a box of tricks, nor is it a bundle of techniques.” Research and write a 3-page paper on the many other things the Father of Modern Management had to say about Strategic Management. Determine the name of the Father of Modern Management and include it in the paper.
NB: College Level

please make sure to follow the instructions well i will be sending you the files

please make sure to follow the instructions well i will be sending you the files very shortly i need you to see and add stuff from the lessons and siscussion i have made and refer to some readings. when you are making the citations please make sure to use accurate and proper citations. please make sure to use your own words because it will be checked through turn it in. please and thank you

Case Study: Congestive Heart Failure
Chief Complaint: 74-year-old woman with sho

Case Study: Congestive Heart Failure
Chief Complaint: 74-year-old woman with shortness of breath and swelling.
History: Martha Wilmington, a 74-year-old woman with a history of rheumatic fever while in her twenties, presented to her physician with complaints of increasing shortness of breath (“dyspnea”) upon exertion. She also noted that the typical swelling she’s had in her ankles for years has started to get worse over the past two months, making it especially difficult to get her shoes on toward the end of the day. In the past week, she’s had a decreased appetite, some nausea and vomiting, and tenderness in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen.
On physical examination, Martha’s jugular veins were noticeably distended. Auscultation of the heart revealed a low-pitched, rumbling systolic murmur, heard best over the left upper sternal border. In addition, she had an extra, “S3” heart sound.
Questions:
1. What is causing this murmur?
2. . You examine Martha’s abdomen and find that she has an enlarged liver (“hepatomegaly”) and a moderate degree of ascites (water in the peritoneal cavity). Explain these findings.
3. Two weeks after starting digoxin, Martha returns to the physician’s office for a follow-up visit. On physical examination, she still has significant hepatomegaly and pitting edema, and is significantly hypertensive (i.e. she has high blood pressure). Her physician prescribes a diuretic called furosemide (or “Lasix”). Why was she given this medication, and how does it work?
please answer each question in the same format of 1,2,3. Do not use no outside source when answering the question use the information above to answer the questions you can do research in order to answer the question and to gain background knowledge no references are needed.

I included the instructions from the syllabus. Please read thoroughly and Includ

I included the instructions from the syllabus. Please read thoroughly and Include all issues that the instructor wants addressed, 6-8 references with 3 of them being peered reviewed the rest can be regular references, include an abstract. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to ask, thank you ahead of time for your work, I look forward to reading your material.
From the Syllabus
This course is a culmination of the skills and abilities acquired during your coursework at ASU. The research paper for this course should integrate these personal and professional skills and discuss the value of higher education in today’s society. Manage your time accordingly because as others will tell you, late papers that have not been coordinated with me before the due date is reached are not accepted and earn zero points. If that happens, you will need to retake the course the following semester.
Specifically address the following issues in your paper.
 What skills (teamwork, technology, communication, etc.) did you develop and/or strengthen?
 How will you use these skills to begin or improve your career?
 What opportunities does higher education provide to citizens?
 What have you gained from your educational journey and why would you encourage others to follow in your footsteps?
 How will you maintain a lifelong learning attitude?
The paper should follow the APA 6th edition format. The paper should include:
 Title page
 Times New Roman (12) font
 Abstract
 Minimum of 7 pages of narrative
 Minimum of 6 references (at least three (3) scholarly and/or peer reviewed articles/references AND three (3) additional references).
 Reference page(s)
The paper should be typed and double-spaced. The reference pages must list all citations used in the paper and again, use at least 6 references, with a minimum of 3 being scholarly or peer-reviewed references. The paper must be professional in appearance and of college-level writing quality. A grading rubric will be provided outlining how the paper will be graded.

describe your ideas about the competencies that program directors must possess t

describe your ideas about the competencies that program directors must possess to be successful leaders. How would you describe your own competencies, relative to your experience as both a teacher and a leader? Which of these competences would you most like to work on during this course?
Are there any qualifies that directors might demonstrate that could present challenges to being an effective manager or leader?

Go to Google Arts and CultureLinks to an external site.. You can use the website

Go to Google Arts and CultureLinks to an external site.. You can use the website linked here, or you can download the app, or both. For purposes of this assignment, the website is recommended simply because it’s easier to navigate on a larger screen, and the size and resolution of images is better. But it’s a great app to have on your phone.
Scroll down the main page until you come to the area titled “Follow your favorites,” click on the “Discover 3,000+ collections” button. Three search categories are offered: All, A-Z, and Maps. If you have trouble finding the collections, you may try if this link to the collectionsLinks to an external site. works for you.
Click on the category of your choice. You will be offered a vast variety of museums, artists, or locations, respectively. Review your options carefully, and choose one. The only restriction is that your choice must be directly relevant to the material you have studied in this course. Select an artist mentioned in your assigned reading, a location that Sayre identifies as pertaining to culture, continuity, and change, or a museum whose collection includes objects from the eras covered in your syllabus. Give yourself some time on this step; review and select carefully.
Then explore the museum, artist, or location of your choice thoroughly. You may well find that the trial leads on forever, so that you can’t track everything down. But spend at least an hour or two trying.
Write a report of 1000-1200 words about what you saw. Include:Explain how you decided on the major category
Explain how you chose the specific museum, artist, or location within your category
Describe the process and experience of exploring that specific topic
Identify your favorite artwork (including a building or specific spot, if you chose “Places”) among those you encountered in your exploration, and what made it your favoriteAdd a small photo of the artwork(s) you discuss (cite with the URL of the source)
Mention the era and the style
The most important thing you learned from this experience.
The report must follow the same format requirements as the Journals:double spaced
1″ margins (or Word default: 1″ top and bottom, 1.25″ each side)
a heading including your name, the date, and the course number at the top left of the first page
a title.

For this assignment, you will imagine yourself living in another country for a y

For this assignment, you will imagine yourself living in another country for a year and compose a 600-word essay about this cross-cultural experience. Cross-cultural ideas focus on comparisons and compromises between different cultural influences. Research on countries and cultures can help navigate cross-cultural influences. Thought experiments can also help us run through scenarios that might arise while working as a part of a global culture and give us a chance to create innovative situations to solve likely problems.
Professor Geert Hofstede conducted one of the most comprehensive studies of how culture influences values. “This does not imply that everyone in a given society is programmed in the same way; there are considerable differences between individuals. It may well be that the differences among individuals in one country culture are bigger than the differences among all country cultures. We can, nevertheless, still use such country scores based on the law of the big numbers, and in fact, most of us are strongly influenced by social control” (Country Comparison, 2018). While defining the cultures and identifying the social control certain factors can have, we still live as individuals and may find some elements of culture challenging and limiting or admirable and inspiring.
For this investigation, you will use Hofstede’s country comparison site.
First, select a “home” country. You may select the United States or a different country if you identify more with another culture. Next, select a “temporary home” country where you will live for one year. If you have already had such an experience abroad, please do not select that country. Instead, investigate a new location for this thought experiment.
Note: Before you begin, be sure that your home and temporary home have marked differences across Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Suppose you’ve selected a new country that holds the same dimensions as home. In that case, the assignment will be difficult to write, as the experience will not feature as many opportunities to investigate cross-cultural influence.
This assignment has four parts.
Part I: Introduction, Continuity, and Change
Introduce the “home” country and “temporary home” country. Why did you choose this country as your “temporary home?”
Summarize your findings from comparing the countries in a few sentences. Use and cite your research. What are some of the similarities and differences between these two countries that you find interesting?
What is one of the cultural dimensions that you will maintain from your home country’s culture? How do you practice this dimension in action, value, or belief? Why do you want to maintain it? How will you solve conflicts that might arise from this cross-cultural difference?
What is one of the cultural dimensions of the new culture you would like to adopt and experience? How do you expect people in your temporary home to practice this dimension in action, value, or belief? Why would it be a good dimension to adopt while living in the culture?
Part II: Cross-Cultural Challenge and Problem Solving
What is one of the cultural dimensions of the new culture that you believe will be the most challenging? Why would this be the most challenging dimension for you? How do you expect people in your temporary home to practice this dimension in action, value, or belief? How will you solve conflicts that might arise from this cross-cultural difference?
About six months into your temporary home country, you have visitors. You may decide if your visitors are friends, family, or coworkers. Your most challenging cultural dimension from Part II is also the most difficult dimension for your visitors. You must help them to solve this problem, as you have solved cross-cultural conflicts during your first six months.
Offer your visitors two practical suggestions for how to manage this cross-cultural conflict. Explain how each suggestion will help them solve the issue. How will your solutions help them find compromise and adaptation? What benefits will they gain from applying your suggestions?
Part III: Cross-Cultural Goal Setting
Reflecting on the items from Part II and your problem solving for your visitors, set one goal for applying the lessons from this assignment to your life. What have you learned about yourself, your priorities, or your values, and how can you use this self-assessment for positive results in your daily life or future career?
Part IV: Conclusion
Share a substantive conclusion. Highlight the paper’s main points, restate the thesis, and share parting conclusions with the reader.
Reference
Hofstede Insights. (n.d.). Compare countries. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/
The paper should be written logically following the instructions above, as well as original and insightful. Label each part of the project (Parts I, II, III, and IV) to help clarify where you are addressing these elements of the paper, but you should also be writing a cohesive, descriiptive essay that demonstrates college-level writing.
The paper should be at least 600 words, in Standard American English, APA style, and 12-point Times New Roman font. Check your grammar, punctuation, and spelling before you submit the work.

To complete this assignment, select a local, state, or federal policy that targe

To complete this assignment, select a local, state, or federal policy that targets the form of oppression and discrimination you described (for example, the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), Veterans Millennium Healthcare Act, Affordable Care Act (ACA), Adoption and Safe Families Act, Medicare, Medicaid, Temporary Aid to Needy Families Act, Social Security Act, or a relevant state or local policy, such as state or local affordable housing policies or health and safety policies related to COVID-19).Then, complete the following:
Describe the purpose of a currently enacted policy that addresses the social justice problem for a chosen population, using scholarly literature for support.Remember, this policy must be enacted—in other words, it must be passed legislation.
Describe the programs and services provided through the policy, using scholarly literature for support.What are examples of the programs and services that are being offered as a result of your chosen policy?
Who is the target population for these programs and services?
Describe how the policy connects to the chosen social justice problem, using scholarly literature for support.Connect the policy to the social justice problem you selected by giving a brief description of the problem. Is it a new problem, something that has recently arisen, or an old problem that has never been resolved?
Describe the historical issues and context that led to the creation of the social problem and policy development.Include information about the voting outcomes for the policy and the legislative leaders who influenced the policy historically and in the present.
Include the impact these historical features have had on the policy’s implementation.
Guidelines
Use scholarly, peer-reviewed literature to support your claims.
Review the Policy Selection and Background rubric for information on how your work will be graded.
Remember that your instructor will be providing feedback on your assignments. Use that feedback to improve the content of your final assignment submission in Week 9, Policy Analysis and Recommendations.
Additional Requirements
The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards.
Cited resources: A minimum of five scholarly sources. Most literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
Length of paper: 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Due date: Assignment must be submitted to your instructor in the courseroom no later than Sunday, 11:59 p.m. CST, this week.Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:Competency 1: Use social justice, anti-racist, and anti-oppressive lenses to assess how social welfare policies affect the delivery of and access to social services. (C5.GP.A)Describe the purpose of a currently enacted policy that addresses the social justice problem for a chosen population, using scholarly literature for support. (C5.GP.A)
Describe the programs and services provided through the policy, using scholarly literature for support. (C5.GP.A)
Describe how the policy connects to the chosen social justice problem, using scholarly literature for support. (C5.GP.A)
Describe the historical issues and context that led to the creation of the social problem and policy development, including details about voting outcomes and legislative leaders, using scholarly literature for support. (C5.GP.A)
Describe the impact of the historical influences on the implementation of the policy, using scholarly literature for support. (C5.GP.A)
Competency 3: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.

Assignment Overview
The HUM2020 Cultural Awareness Essay is designed to evaluate

Assignment Overview
The HUM2020 Cultural Awareness Essay is designed to evaluate your understanding of Florida Gateway College’s Cultural Awareness General Learning Outcome: Students will explain how aspects of culture relate to the human experience.
As we have discussed throughout this course:
All art disciplines express the human experience, with each doing so in its own unique way. Of the art disciplines that we have studied in this course, painting, literature, and music are the most fundamental.
The arts are unique among the humanities in their ability to reveal values, which are an important aspect of the human experience. In this course, we have considered how numerous works of art reveal values.
There are three primary types of art criticism: descriptive, interpretive, and evaluative. Our emphasis in this course has been on the proper use of these types of criticism through an examination of artistic form.
Prompt
Use descriptive criticism and interpretive criticism to analyze three provided works of art—a painting, a poem, and a piece of music—in order to determine using evaluative criticism which work you believe best expresses values
Instructions
After choosing ONE painting, ONE poem, and ONE piece of music from the works provided above, write a 1250- to 1500-word essay, structured in five distinct paragraphs, as follows:
PARAGRAPH ONE—DESCRIPTIVE CRITICISM [250-300 words]: State the purpose of your essay (just one sentence) and describe your three chosen works of art (one painting, one poem, and one piece). Your description of each work must include its identifying information (artist, title, and year) and a succinct discussion of its subject matter and form. Remember that descriptive criticism should not include any interpretation or evaluation.What are you attempting to accomplish/explain in this essay?
Which three works of art (which painting, which poem, and which piece) have you chosen?
What is the basic subject matter of your chosen painting and how is it depicted through form?
What is the basic subject matter of your chosen poem and how is it depicted through form?
What is the basic subject matter of your chosen piece and how is it depicted through form?
PARAGRAPH TWO—INTERPRETIVE CRITICISM [250-300 words]: Explain how your chosen painting expresses one or more specific values based on its content. Your interpretation must consider how the work’s subject matter is transformed into content through its form, with a detailed analysis focused on at least two relevant aspects of form. Remember that interpretive criticism should not include any evaluation.What is this painting’s possible content?
How is this painting’s content revealed through its form?
What value(s) does this painting express based on its content?
PARAGRAPH THREE—INTERPRETIVE CRITICISM [250-300 words]: Explain how your chosen poem expresses one or more specific values based on its content. Your interpretation must consider how the work’s subject matter is transformed into content through its form, with a detailed analysis focused on at least two relevant aspects of form. Remember that interpretive criticism should not include any evaluation.What is this poem’s possible content?
How is this poem’s content revealed through its form?
What value(s) does this poem express based on its content?
PARAGRAPH FOUR—INTERPRETIVE CRITICISM [250-300 words]: Explain how your chosen piece expresses one or more specific values based on its content. Your interpretation must consider how the work’s subject matter is transformed into content through its form, with a detailed analysis focused on at least two relevant aspects of form. Remember that interpretive criticism should not include any evaluation.What is this piece’s possible content?
How is this piece’s content revealed through its form?
What value(s) does this piece express based on its content?
PARAGRAPH FIVE—EVALUATIVE CRITICISM (250-300 words): Explain which ONE of your three chosen works best expresses its respective value(s) through perfection, insight, and inexhaustibility. Your evaluation should be based on your previous description and interpretation of the work, including your analysis of its form. You may also state your opinion about the quality and personal significance of the work.
Which of your three chosen works do you believe best expresses its value(s)?
How does this work express its value(s) through the perfection of its form?
How does this work express its value(s) through the insight into its subject matter?
How does this work express its value(s) through the inexhaustibility of its content?
Why is this work and the value(s) it expresses important in your human experience?
***Before beginning work on this culminating course essay, you are encouraged to review the previous writing assignments in this course—including their instructions, grading rubrics, and my comments about your submissions—in order to be as successful as possible on this assignment.***
Requirements
Your essay must be based completely on YOUR analysis of the works, without any outside research or use of AI. Obvious or suspected academic dishonesty may result in failure of this assignment and the course.
After first stating a work’s information in your essay, using proper punctuation, you should simply refer to it as “the work” or “Shakespeare’s play” (for example) for the remainder of your discussion of the work.
Format your essay as a “print-ready” document (one-inch margins, double-spacing, indented paragraphs, page numbers, and a standard 12-point black font), with your name, date, and course/section at the top.
Compare your completed essay to the below rubric before submitting it. Also, carefully proofread your essay for writing quality, including for grammar and mechanics (spelling, punctuation, capitalization, etc.).
Submit your completed essay as a PDF file via the provided submission link by the posted due date. Late essay will not be accepted for any reason, except significant documented medical and/or personal issues.
Reminders
***After submitting your response via the “Submit Assignment” button, Turnitin will generate an originality report about it (this may take a few minutes). You should review your originality report in order to avoid any possibility of plagiarism or use of AI in your response. If necessary to remove any possible plagiarism or use of AI, you may revise and resubmit your response before the due date—with your final submission being the one that is graded—without penalty.***
***If you have any questions or concerns about any aspect of this assignment, please do not hesitate to contact me via the Canvas Inbox at least 24 hours before it is due!***
Rubric
Cultural Awareness Essay [Fall 2023]
Cultural Awareness Essay [Fall 2023]
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
5 ptsExceeds Expectations
Opening sentence provides a brief and insightful explanation of essay’s purpose.
4 ptsMeets Expectations
Opening sentence provides a brief and reasonable explanation of essay’s purpose.
3 ptsNeeds Improvement
Opening sentence provides a rambling and/or weak explanation of essay’s purpose.
0 ptsInadequate
Opening sentence is unacceptable.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescriptive Criticism
15 ptsExceeds Expectations
Description of subject matter for all three works is clear, very detailed, and focuses on several relevant aspects of form.
12 ptsMeets Expectations
Description of subject matter for some works is fair, somewhat detailed, and/or focuses on some relevant aspects of form.
9 ptsNeeds Improvement
Description of subject matter for most works is weak, lacks detail, and/or focuses on few relevant aspects of form.
0 ptsInadequate
Descriptive criticism of works is unacceptable.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpretive Criticism (W1)
15 ptsExceeds Expectations
Interpretation of work is very logical, includes a highly detailed analysis of form, and clearly discusses value(s).
12 ptsMeets Expectations
Interpretation of work is mostly logical, includes a fairly detailed analysis of form, and/or partially discusses value(s).
9 ptsNeeds Improvement
Interpretation of work is somewhat logical, includes a slightly detailed analysis of form, and/or minimally discusses value(s).
0 ptsInadequate
Interpretive criticism of work is unacceptable.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpretive Criticism (W2)
15 ptsExceeds Expectations
Interpretation of work is very logical, includes a highly detailed analysis of form, and clearly discusses value(s).
12 ptsMeets Expectations
Interpretation of work is mostly logical, includes a fairly detailed analysis of form, and/or partially discusses value(s).
9 ptsNeeds Improvement
Interpretation of work is somewhat logical, includes a slightly detailed analysis of form, and/or minimally discusses value(s).
0 ptsInadequate
Interpretive criticism of work is unacceptable.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpretive Criticism (W3)
15 ptsExceeds Expectations
Interpretation of work is very logical, includes a highly detailed analysis of form, and clearly discusses value(s).
12 ptsMeets Expectations
Interpretation of work is mostly logical, includes a fairly detailed analysis of form, and/or partially discusses value(s).
9 ptsNeeds Improvement
Interpretation of work is somewhat logical, includes a slightly detailed analysis of form, and/or minimally discusses value(s).
0 ptsInadequate
Interpretive criticism of work is unacceptable.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluative Criticism
15 ptsExceeds Expectations
Evaluation of work fully addresses all three standards of criticism, clearly focuses on the expression of value(s), and is logically connected to description and interpretation.
12 ptsMeets Expectations
Evaluation of work partially addresses all three standards of criticism, mostly focuses on the expression of value(s), and/or is loosely connected to description and interpretation.
9 ptsNeeds Improvement
Evaluation of work only addresses two standards of criticism, slightly focuses on the expression of value(s), and/or is not connected to description and interpretation.
0 ptsInadequate
Evaluative criticism of work is unacceptable.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality
10 ptsExceeds Expectations
Writing is high quality; includes no errors that impact overall meaning.
8 ptsMeets Expectations
Writing is fair quality; includes some errors that impact overall meaning.
6 ptsNeeds Improvement
Writing is poor quality; includes many errors that impact overall meaning.
0 ptsInadequate
Writing quality is unacceptable.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWork Information
5 ptsExceeds Expectations
Work information and punctuation is completely correct and all required work information is provided.
4 ptsMeets Expectations
Work information and punctuation is mostly correct and/or some required work information is provided.
3 ptsNeeds Improvement
Work information and punctuation is partially correct and/or little required work information is provided.
0 ptsInadequate
Work information is unacceptable.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting
5 ptsExceeds Expectations
Formatting meets all stated requirements.
4 ptsMeets Expectations
Formatting meets most stated requirements.
3 ptsNeeds Improvement
Formatting meets few stated requirements.
0 ptsInadequate
Formatting is unacceptable.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeA. Aspects of Culture4pts – Detailed and accurate analysis of all required aspects of culture. 3pts – Fairly detailed and/or accurate analysis of most required aspects of culture. 2pts – Minimal and/or inaccurate analysis of most required aspects of culture. 1pt – No analysis of aspects of culture.
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 ptsExceeds Expectations
3 ptsMeets Expectations
2 ptsNeeds Improvement
1 ptsInadequate
—
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeB. Human Experience4pts – Original and relevant description of the human experience. 3pts – Somewhat original and/or relevant description of the human experience. 2pts – General and/or irrelevant description of the human experience. 1pt – No description of the human experience.
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 ptsExceeds Expectations
3 ptsMeets Expectations
2 ptsNeeds Improvement
1 ptsInadequate
—
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC. Relationship of A to B4pts – Developed and logical explanation of the relationship between required aspects of culture and the human experience. 3pts – Partially developed explanation of the relationship between most required aspects of culture and the human experience. 2pts – Vaguely developed explanation of the relationship between most required aspects of culture and the human experience. 1pt – No explanation of the relationship between aspects of culture and the human experience.
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 ptsExceeds Expectations
3 ptsMeets Expectations
2 ptsNeeds Improvement
1 ptsInadequate
—
Total Points: 100
PreviousNext

Hi! if you could please help me with this paper, it doesn’t need to be impressiv

Hi! if you could please help me with this paper, it doesn’t need to be impressive at all; just meet the requirements. I appreciate this so much and I hope you can help.
Research Term Paper CH203
Comparative Study: U.S. and Nevada Constitutions
Since this course fulfills the civics and constitutional education requirements for students set forth by the State of Nevada, this assignment focuses on governing documents.
Both the United States and Nevada Constitutions have interesting histories of their own. The national constitution was cobbled together in an effort that began in order to reform the Articles of Confederation. The proposal for an entirely new constitution caught many of the Founding Fathers off guard and debate over the structure and powers to be given to the new government were intense. While the US Constitution was put together during peacetime, there were enormous challenges facing the young republic which manifest themselves in the language of the document. The Nevada Constitution reflects the contemporary history of the country. Nevada was admitted to the Union in 1864, during some of the most tumultuous times in our history, the Civil War.
Despite their different origins, these two governing documents tell us much about the people who wrote them and what their desires and concerns for government were. For the purposes of this paper, I want you to compare and contrast the U.S. and Nevada Constitutions. You should address the following in your narrative:
Briefly discuss the history of each document
What is the purpose of each document?
What does each constitution say about slavery? Why?
What does each constitution say about the right to bear arms? Why?
What does each constitution say about religious freedom? Why?
What does the length of each document say about the nature of the government the constitution is written for?
This research term paper should be between 2000-2200 words in length. It should be double spaced and your sources of information must be cited. The paper should contain a works cited page. You may use either MLA or Turabian in your source citation style. The paper will be due, submitted to CANVAS not later than 2355 hrs on August 2nd, 2024.
Both documents are easily accessed online. Just do a web search for US Constitution text or Nevada Constitution text, Alternatively, you can use the links I provide below.
https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Const/NVConst.html#:~:text=2917.%5D,Government%2C%20do%20establish%20this%20Constitution.&text=ARTICLE.,-1.Links to an external site.
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitutionLinks to an external site.