Stereotypical Depiction of Muslims in Hollywood

The Arabs seem to be the most insulted group in the history of Hollywood. They are depicted in movies mainly as subhuman. The term subhuman was used by the Nazis to denigrate Gypsies as well as other minorities. Such depiction has been around for more than a hundred years. Even places of worship have become sites for the expression of hatred and exclusion. In addition, elected officials and policymakers legitimize the differential treatment of Arabs and Muslims (Bahdi, 2019). These discriminatory experiences can be frequently based on the stereotypes gained from Hollywood films. This paper is intended to reflect on the issue of how those stereotypes eliminate, dishonor, and overburden Muslims in the USA and Canada.

Increasingly growing social science studies documented the ways in which Muslims are portrayed as violent people (Sandefur, 2015). The studies show images of Arabs and Muslims in the Hollywood contexture both declarative and constitutive of this trope (Sandefur, 2015). Men from these communities are depicted as driven to conflict with the West, terrorists, dictatorial and violent fathers and husbands, and, occasionally, rapists of white women (Badhi, 2019).

Hollywood almost always portrays characters from the Middle East in the context of evil, despite the latter being often immigrants and having to adjust to the new social structures in Northern America (Bauder & Shields, 2015). Therefore, the findings from the studies mentioned above have demonstrated that Muslim women can be depicted merely as mothers who give birth to terrorists.

A Fathers Day cartoon exemplifies the stereotypes of Arabs and Muslims mentioned above. The cartoon depicts an Arab man with exaggerated features and dresses gleefully receiving a Fathers Day gift (Kassam, 2018). A child gazes, mesmerized, at the father who is proudly showing off his Fathers Day gift: sticks of explosives lashed together on a belt. The capital letters D-A-D-D-Y appear on several of the sticks of explosives worn by the want-to-be suicide bomber father. The card that reads Happy Fathers Day turns out to be on the floor.

The cartoon posits Arabs as inherently inimical to Western values. The explosive belt gifted from child to father is a perversion of Fathers Day in North America, which is intended to celebrate love and gratitude (Badhi, 2019). The Arabs in this cartoon pass on a different set of values: their families are formed to breed violence and hate. However, the reality is that the majority of Muslims are non-violent refugees that would seek shelter and support in other countries that would not prosecute them (Friesen, 2017; Amin-Khan, 2015).

The English script and the Fathers Day theme suggest that whatever evil the family plans to propagate, they will do so in Canada (Badhi, 2019). The child is happily showing his own propensity for violence at a very early age and conveys the impression that he is thoughtlessly destined to follow in the footsteps of his immoral father. The fathers eyes are wild, suggesting his untethered delight at receiving (and giving) the gift of violence.

Overall, the basis of this study demonstrates the need for greater awareness and education among legal professionals of the three common Arab and Muslim stereotypes, so that they can better recognize and analyze stereotyping experiences. The social science literature and reports by community organizations conclusively demonstrate that Arabs and Muslims face plenty of stereotypes, despite Canadas commitment to equality. Lawyers who argue cases for their clients, human rights commissions, legal support centers, and reviewing courts, including the Supreme Court of Canada and the US, can all help advance stereotype literacy. Some members of marginalized communities avoid the legal system because they know too much about the systems ability and willingness to hear and understand them.

References

Amin-Khan, T. (2015). Security and its impact on migrants and refugees. In H. Bauder & J. Shields (Eds.), Immigration, integration and the settlement experience in North America (pp. 118-143). Canadian Scholars Press.

Bahdi, R. (2019). All Arabs Are Liars: Arab and Muslim stereotypes in Canadian human rights law. University of Windsor.

Bauder, H., & Shields, J. (2015). Immigrant experiences in North America. Canadian Scholars Press Inc.

Friesen, J. (2017). Syrian exodus to Canada: One year later, a look at who the refugees are and where they went. The Globe and Mail. Web.

Kassam, S. (2018). Standing on guard for thee: The Acceptable Muslim and boundaries of racialized inclusion in Canada. University of Toronto.

Sandefur, R. (2015). Bridging the gap: Rethinking outreach for greater access to justice. Little Rock Law Review, 37(4). Web.

Hollywood in Recount by Carey McWilliams

In his Recount, Carey McWilliams introduces his interpretation of life within the boundaries of Hollywood, the world that radically differs from reality. In particular, the writer refers to it as a place that everything can find a rescue from real-life problems and daily routine, a world where some unexpected events are constantly taking place and everyone witnesses their dreams to come true. At the same time, Hollywood is also represented as a dystopia where nothing can bring in a better future, except for the possibility to forget all negative experiences. Deception, illusion, and veiled dreams are the only things that Hollywood can offer to people. Despite this, people still strive to release their sufferings by falling into the fake world of the movie industry.

Lack of genuineness and authenticity makes the Hollywood world deprived of true values and, as a result, all the events that happened in this realm cannot be perceived with the utmost feelings and emotions. Thus, the author mentions some events with extreme calmness and reason, as if these events should be taken for granted. What is more threatening is that all people involved in the movie industry find it hard to distinguish between the real world and the one that is dictated by Hollywood. The recount under analysis, therefore, reflects accurately the problems and hardships of the Depression period during which people strived to escape from the challenges of life and delve into the ideal framework created in Hollywood. Indeed, the movie industry has managed to take advantage of peoples hopelessness and capture them in their own dreams and wishes. Therefore, it is logical that McWilliams compares Hollywood with the place where people are living in circles.

Copyright Infringement in the US Motion Picture Industry

The entertainment industry exists due to the opportunity to exchange ideas and use a wide range of expressive means in order to control peoples emotional energy. It makes the consumers of media products happier, distracting their attention from concerns and problems. Even though the idea of the entertainment industry is quite clear (to give people emotional release and, if necessary, support), many people related to the industry understand that unique ideas act as an important source of money, and they do their best in order to protect their intellectual property. Speaking about copyright cases, it is necessary to pay attention to Hollywood in the middle of the last century. During that period, Hollywood filmmakers had numerous difficulties when it was necessary to use characters that famous actors of that time had already played. Among the actors who were involved in copyright infringement cases, there were Charlie Chaplin and James M.Cain (Decherney 30). Due to a great number of issues related to the use of plots and characters, the courts of the United States started developing new practices, helping to distinguish between original characters and their look-alikes.

Apart from the cases that encouraged the courts of the United States to invent new explanations and thoroughly examine them to prove copyright infringement, there were others that involved too many similarities between movies. Discussing such cases, it is important to remember famous natural horror movies devoted to sharks. Great White, a movie that appeared more than thirty years ago, was destined to become extremely popular in Italy and the United States. Despite the fact that the box office sales revenue was quite large, the movie under consideration was banned from release after a high-profile copyright infringement scandal. The first attempt to prevent the distribution of the given movie was made by Universal Studios prior to its first public presentation in the United States.

The representatives of the film studio believed that Great White was very similar to Jaws, a movie that had been released almost six years earlier. Nevertheless, the claim of the film studio was not satisfied. Four weeks later, the studio made an additional attempt to redress an injustice and prevent the misuse of the story told in Jaws, the movie that was based on an eponymously named book. Having reviewed the plots of these two movies and the ways that visual expressions were used, one of the courts in California established that there were numerous similarities between these movies. Apart from the use of the same genre, the characters from these movies were quite similar to each other. Due to the efforts of Universal Pictures, film providers were deprived of an opportunity to use the movie in the United States.

It is extremely important to take the case of Great White into account as the latter is often listed among the movies that do not possess any artistic value on their own. Discussing the case of Great White and the inability of its screenplay writers and director to make the movie more unique, many researchers claim that the movie presents a copy of Jaws of questionable quality (Verevis 272). Regarding numerous similarities between movies, the court was paying attention not only to some formal elements that are usually included in the analysis, such as the use of color, plot, specific details, and key themes from movies. Considering that the themes used in these two movies were quite different, it was decided to pay attention to the general impression of common consumers.

Another notable copyright case that needs to be mentioned involves the participation of Art Buchwald (a successful author) and Paramount Pictures Corporation (Greene 131). The case under consideration is listed among the most famous scandals of the 1990s that have helped to establish the most recent rules, regulating the collaboration of scriptwriters and large film studios. Coming to America is a famous comedy film about an African prince who tries to find a bride in the United States. The financial success of the movie was obvious, and many people wanted to watch it due to the cast of characters. Nevertheless, some people were extremely unhappy about the success of the movie. Arthur Buchwald, a famous satirist, journalist, and scriptwriter, filed a lawsuit against Paramount Pictures Corporation in order to redress an injustice. Buchwald claimed that Paramount Pictures Corporation had used his idea to film a movie about an African prince and invite Eddie Murphy to star.

According to him, the film studio refused to buy his idea, and it resulted in a lawsuit against the organization. Arthur Buchwald had enough evidence to prove that he was the first to forward the idea of the comedy film about a prince from Africa. The legal wrangling was preceded by numerous changes related to the terms of collaboration. Initially, Buchwald encouraged the representatives of Paramount Pictures Corporation to get acquainted with his draft of the movie script, and they agreed to use it to create a new movie. After some period of time, the company informed the author about their unwillingness to use his script, and Buchwald decided to establish collaboration with Warner Brothers Production. After the second refusal, Buchwald found out that Paramount Pictures Corporation was going to use his script illegally (he was not mentioned as an author). The court acknowledged that the movie studio had violated Buchwalds rights, and Paramount Pictures Corporation was urged to pay a large compensation.

Copyrights cases in the film industry of the United States are numerous, and the creation of Hollywood films is regarded as the most expensive art (Bahar 537). Considering a range of risks that can impact the success of movies, moviemakers try to give special consideration to external analysis in order to avoid being accused of copyright infringement. Nevertheless, there are cases when claimants spread wrong information, trying to fulfil their own financial goals. For instance, the case of Alien vs. Predator remains one of the most prominent examples of such tendency (Bahar 537). Eight years ago, a scriptwriter named James Muller accused the creators of the movie using his movie script. Trying to prove his point, the claimant used a few arguments concerning the opulent similarity between the two scripts. Having reviewed the case and the materials provided by the claimant, the court established that the degree of similarity between two scripts was very low. In fact, the only thing that could be used as the evidence was the presence of two fictitious creatures that were fighting. The claimant failed to demonstrate numerous similarities between these scripts, and he was urged to pay compensation to the film studio.

In order to avoid being accused of copyright infringement, American scriptwriters and songwriters can use preliminary permission. The case of Lin Manuel Miranda (the author of Hamilton) indicates that scriptwriters can use the information retrieved from other sources as parts of their work and avoid copyright infringement liability. The creator of Hamilton states that he has used the works by Ron Chernow, Joseph Ellis, and other authors, seeing them as sources of inspiration (Davis 93). Obtaining preliminary permission, the author creates something new with the help of others works, and this is why his scripts are still unique. This approach to work, as the absence of lawsuits against this person indicates, should be noted by numerous Hollywood filmmakers. Despite that, the misuse of online content often becomes the cause of copyright infringement cases all over the world (Podlas 1).

In conclusion, copyright infringement cases in the motion picture industry in the United States are extremely different in terms of the goals and intentions of claimants. On the one hand, there are people who feel that their ideas are misused by other producers, scriptwriters, or actors. In this case, the opportunity to sue under the copyright law of the United States acts as an important chance to minimize financial losses and prevent similar cases in the future. On the other hand, accusing people or their projects of copyright infringement, some claimants fulfil their personal goals and get an opportunity to come close to success. In fact, common people who have failed to become famous scriptwriters or film directors can use copyright scandals as a chance to win fame and attract the attention of the global community to their new projects.

Works Cited

Bahar, Rikki. The Copyright Infringement Test: A New Approach to Literary Misappropriation in Film. Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum, vol. 2, no. 4, 2014, pp. 529-548.

Davis, Deidre. Living to See His Glory Days: Why Hamiltons Lin Manuel Miranda is Not Liable for Copyright Infringement, But Other Writers and Composers Are. The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, vol. 17, no. 1, 2017, pp. 92-108.

Podlas, Kimberlianne. Linking to Liability: When Linking to Leaked Movies, Scripts, and Television Shows Is Copyright Infringement. Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, vol. 6, 2015, p. 1-58.

Verevis, Constantine. Blockbuster Remakes. Akademisk Kvarter, vol. 7, 2013, pp. 263-382.

Decherney, Peter. One Law to Rule Them All. Hollywood and the Law, edited by Paul McDonald et al., Palgrave, 2015, pp. 23-42.

Greene, Kevin. Idea Theft: Frivolous Copyright-Lite Claims, or Hollywood Business Model? Hastings Science and Technology Law Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, 2015, pp. 119-142.

Racial Stereotypes in Hollywood Film Industry

In light of the recent Black Lives Matter movement and other peaceful protests, discussions about race, racial inequality, and racial stereotypes are at the forefront of society’s current discourse. Given the popularity of movies such as Ryan Cooglers ‘Black Panther’ or John M. Chu’s ‘Crazy Rich Asians’, it is common for people to assume racial stereotypes are either non-existent or vastly improving in Hollywood films. Yet, year after year, Hollywood’s most popular movies perpetuate and reflect common stereotypes and prejudices. This paper aims to reveal how racial stereotypes are perpetuated in Hollywood and what can be done to prevent this persistent problem.

Whether it is white males portraying Othello in black face, or Asians being continually portrayed as villainous cats in Disney animations, racial stereotypes in entertainment and film have always existed. Although arguably, older portrayals of ethnic minorities may be down to a result of ignorance and a lack of education, racial stereotypes continue to exist within 21st-century films. In modern-day society, racism in Hollywood films is perhaps more covert. Still, it is extremely prevalent and has major effects on how society views minorities and how minorities view themselves.

The Hollywood film industry is dominated and controlled by white producers and directors and has primarily made and promoted white-cantered movies to court white audiences who are more valued than other racial groups. The industry’s growing emphasis on increasing profits and minimizing creativity has meant that all the significant studios in Hollywood have authority over the production, promotion, and administration of new and upcoming films. This profit first model makes it extremely difficult for racial minority filmmakers, producers, actors, and storylines to garner opportunities and popularity. As a result, white and predominantly male filmmakers continue to create stories and films that perpetuate harmful and dangerous stereotypes surrounding racial minorities in the 21st century. These platitudinous portrayals of minorities are not only representations on-screen but justifications for the ignorance, bigotry, and prejudice minorities are subject to every day. As a result, Hollywood films play a significant role in constructing the idea of race and racial order in society and negatively impacting the lives of minorities.

Stereotyping Africa

The success of ‘Black Panther’, further, its ability to destabilize stereotypes about Africa through its portrayal of an avant-garde country maintained by powerful females and relationships makes it easy to forget the common stereotypes Hollywood places on this beautiful, broad continent. Home to fifty-three diverse countries, Hollywood continues to illustrate Africa as one country where all its citizens look the same, ignoring its diversity, vast cultures, and groups of people.

Conversely, some movies set in Africa, like ‘Tarzan’, lack any black characters. Although sending racist messages is not the primary goal of these movies, the underlying message can be highly damaging. Highlighting the domination white people historically had over African countries devalues what the continent and African people have to offer.

Black Representation

African Americans are in many Hollywood films right now, with stars like Michael B. Jordan, Viola Davies, and Denzel Washington dominating our screens. Unfortunately, this was not the case historically. When black characters were first written into theatre and film, they were often performed by white men in black faces. As black faces began to fade, legitimate black faces on the screen started to rise however these advancements were not without limitations. Black actors were only hired to play stereotypical and restrictive roles, such as enslaved people and housekeepers.

Over time, these restrictive roles have developed into popular male stereotypes such as the ‘criminal’ or the ‘gangster’. As a result, there is a disproportionate number of black male actors portraying drug dealers, con artists, and villains in Hollywood films. Well-known examples include Denzel Washington’s ‘American Gangster’ and Ice Cubes ‘Boyz n the Hood’. Despite their popularity and critical acclaim, both movies perpetuate the common racial stereotype that all black men in America are violent criminals looking to create trouble without getting caught.

Ironically, movies with such acclaim could profoundly change the way society both treats and views black men. With a focus on racial injustice and the long-standing laws and legislations negatively impacting black men in the United States, Hollywood films could highlight the institutional racism affecting how black men are unfairly treated and viewed. Additionally, increasing awareness in movies and popular culture would likely infiltrate and change society’s views on practices like racial profiling and red family zoning.

Unfortunately, like their male counterparts, black women are also unable to escape stereotypical and restrictive roles. Subject to multiple racial stereotypes, black women are most commonly depicted as the ‘angry black woman’, such as Wendy Williams’s character Gail in ‘Think Like a Man’. The ‘angry black woman’ displays negative characteristics like being loud and aggressive, overly opinionated, and highly damaging. Used for comedic purposes, these two-dimensional views of black women on screen are a disservice to black women in the real world. Images that have been repeated are derogatory and directly affect how society views, values, and ultimately treat a black woman and their livelihood. It seems unfair that filmmakers continue to use the trope of the angry black woman as a comedic character without also highlighting their inequitable and unjust experiences that perhaps have created a level of natural bitterness towards white people. Storytellers pick and choose what part of history to illustrate regarding the past and narratives of black women.

Furthermore, male and female black characters are often the first to be killed/die in movies, particularly in the horror genre. This is essentially a result of Hollywood making movies for white audiences and thus reinforcing the popular notion that white people have more value than their black counterparts and must survive until the end.

Hispanic Representation

The Hispanic community makes up 18.7% of the US population and, as of 2003, is officially the largest minority group in the United States. However, figures from the study ‘Inequality in 1,200 Popular Films: Examining Portrayals of Gender, Race, Ethnicity, LGTBQ and Disability from 2007 to 2018’ highlight those Hispanic actors only make up 5.3% of characters in the top one hundred most popular films of 2018.

Hispanic individuals have a broad history, rich in culture, traditions, and beliefs, yet their on-screen representation is extremely narrow, focusing largely on their sexual appeal, desires, and promiscuity. Latinas are still objectified in Hollywood, depicted as beautiful but uneducated and unqualified working-class citizens. Movies such as ‘Maid in Manhattan’, where Jenifer Lopez’s character Marissa plays a hardworking, single mother, dreaming of a way out of her current job position as a maid in a hotel in New York and into a better life for her and her son. Like in any romantic comedy, she achieves her dream of a better life, however, not from her hard work, but by marrying a wealthy white man, thus reinforcing the idea of the ‘white savior’ and that marrying a wealthy, white man is the only way Latina women can escape their social class. This portrayal is vastly inaccurate, Latinas as three-dimensional characters who defy sexual stereotypes, filmmakers are doing a disservice to Latinas and their work. The film should tell a story, and if authenticity is a benchmark for great storytelling, they have missed it by far. As young girls continue to watch movies like ‘Maid in Manhattan’, they learn that being independent and hardworking is not enough. Stories about Hispanic women should be empowering, focusing on their attributes and skills other than sex appeal.

Similarly, Latino men are often represented as the suburban housewives’ steamy ‘side piece’. Hispanic men’s roles in the film are usually limited because movies tend to only portray them as uneducated and unqualified. We see plenty of Latino groundskeepers and construction workers and rarely businessmen or doctors. When Hispanic men are depicted as wealthy and successful, it is usually a result of drug trafficking or being cartel members. This notion validates the popular trope that Latino men are lazy, divisive, and often dangerous humans and disregard any beneficial impacts Latin Americans have introduced into American culture.

Asian Representation

Asians are yet another minority group subject to both underrepresentation and inaccurate representation within the Hollywood film industry. Of the top 100 Hollywood films in 2018, 3895 included a character of ethnicity, of which only 8.2% were Asian. Like Latinas, Asian females are overly sexualized in Hollywood films. However, unlike the role of Hispanic women, Asian sex symbols are portrayed as sly dominatrixes, using their sexuality to coerce white males into giving them what they want. This is evident in Zhang Ziyi’s portrayal of Hu Li in ‘Rush Hour 2’, where she plays a dangerous and ruthless seducer attempting to take down two detectives. Not only are Asian females subject to stereotypes, but so are their clothing. More often than not, sexualized Asian characters are dressed in a form-fitting, revealing cheongsam, a traditional Chinese garment modified to fit the lens of the Western male gaze. This portrayal of Asian women as sexual, devious objects presents an inaccurate representation of Asian women and a dangerous one. Being perceived as exotic and submissive contributes to a higher risk of sexual assault as if Asian women are somehow ‘asking for it’.

Comparatively, Asian males are often portrayed as antisocial genii’ or karate kings. The most popular movies with Asian leads are typically action movies where skills in the martial arts save the day. Arguably, China’s most famous film star, Jackie Chan, is a tight cast for action movies only. Sociologists suggest that if Asians are not portrayed in a stereotypical role, then they are given no role at all, thus rendered invisible by Hollywood and mass audiences.

Furthermore, Hollywood films continue to cast any Asian actor for any Asian role indiscriminately. For example, a native Korean actor may play the role of a Chinese character, which as a result perpetuates the idea that Asia is a monolith with interchangeable cultures even though Asia is made up of dozens of countries, each with their own different culture and traditions. This one-dimensional portrayal of Asians leads to viewers having a very narrow understanding of Asian people and Asian culture. Dwayne Johnson, an actor of Asian heritage, is currently the richest actor in Hollywood, which on the outset, looks fantastic for API representation. However, Johnson plays 13 of API roles in the Hollywood film industry because he fits the desired mold. As a result, stereotypes are reinforced, and opportunities for other Asian actors are limited. Furthermore, it affects the way Asian Americans view themselves. For example, consistently comparing oneself to an overachieving genius or a sexual object sends the message that Asians are only worthy if these characteristics are held. Additionally, because Asian Americans are fed idealized Western standards, an idealization begins to form. Thus, the idea white people are ‘better’ is perpetuated due to these harmful and inaccurate stereotypes.

Native American Representation

Native Americans are victims of both relative invisibility and symbolic annihilation. Although not hugely represented in the United States, indigenous people’s representation on screen is far lower than their representation in society. Furthermore, when Native Americans are represented in Hollywood films, it is both inaccurate and ‘frozen in time’. The depiction of the merciless soldier, seen in movies like ‘Peter Pan’, is too frequent and inexact. Historically, Native Americans were the victims of white Europeans’ violence in their quest to take over American land but protecting their land is not how indigenous people are depicted in movies. Instead, they are seen as fierce fighters targeting innocent white cavalry. This recurring stereotype that Native American men are brutal and savage adds to the opposing notions about them, perpetuating the existing prejudice and discrimination.

Depictions of female Native Americans are almost opposite of their male counterparts. Seen as objects of beauty, fantasy and desire for white men, Indigenous women are seen as submissive, weak women. Even movies like ‘Pocahontas’, which defy the typical ideal that Native American women are vulnerable, still manage to send negative messages about the dynamic of relationships between indigenous women and non-indigenous men, which is likely to lead to dangerous relationships and dominance in reality.

These consistent caricatures of Indigenous peoples erode into the way society views them as well as how they can consider themselves; as Leavitt explains, the invisibility of Native Americans in the media undermines self-understanding as it results in homogenizing Native American identity. It has been suggested that the best way to create positive, social change for Indigenous people is for them to become producers, directors, and writers of their own stories, so that American Indians can regain control of their images and be able to combat stereotypes and the exclusion of Native Americans in the creative process.

Behind the Scenes

Much like the rest of America’s powerful institutions, the Hollywood film industry is controlled by wealthy white men. Hollywood filmmakers have been the sole creators of narratives and stories available to the public throughout filmmaking history. Studies have shown that white men remain in control even in the 21st century and continue to create a risk-averse, homogenized culture.

In a study focusing on the representation and portrayals of ethnic minority groups in the top 100 most popular movies in 2018, fifteen directors were black, four were Asian, and three were Latino. Native Americans were absent in any behind-the-scenes role. Movies that black directors created allotted 44.5% of their speaking characters to black actors. Comparatively, movies that non-black directors (predominantly white) created allocated just 11.3% of speaking characters to black actors.

Without help from minority producers, it seems unlikely that white directors will be able to produce an accurate depiction or representation of minorities and their stories, however hard they may try. Inherent bias and white privilege prevent people from garnering a proper understanding of the effects of prejudice, discrimination, and racism.

Away from the creative side of the industry, there is little to no representation of minorities at the large conglomerates, corporations, and media companies in decision-making roles. There can be no trickle-down effect if there is no voice to be heard at the top level. In addition, inherent racial bias in executives and decision-makers has created an added difficulty for minorities to break into an already tricky business. As a result, for any minority creatives, directors, writers, and producers that have managed to infiltrate the industry, there is an added pressure to include and incorporate minority actors to enhance and improve the exposure of minority talent.

Conclusion

Representations in the media affect how we view and understand ourselves and the people around us. For minority groups seeing caricatured, distorted, and generalized versions of themselves may lead to dangerous self-stereotyping and negative self-worth. Furthermore, on-screen stereotyping of ethnic minorities reinforces many of the western ideals and prejudices still covertly prevalent today. When portrayed as humorous, stereotypes can normalize a misinterpretation of people of color, caging them into singular roles when the reality shows them to be well-rounded people with lives and stories of their own. As a result, the evaluative discussion is vital to prevent the perpetuation of racial stereotypes in Hollywood movies.

The Hollywood film industry’s global economic interests create an extremely challenging sector for minority talent to break into. Historically white stories have been created by white directors and producers and performed by white actors have continually been the most successful. Minority stories have not had the opportunity to succeed as they have very rarely been created. With past successes being the model for maximizing profits, white executives at media companies like Disney and Universal Pictures are likely to reject different stories that include narratives of other minority groups. This, therefore, accounts for the lack of minority representation on screen due to a lack of diverse stories being told.

Change must start at the top to prevent racial stereotypes from being perpetuated further in Hollywood films. Minorities must be hired and encouraged to pursue careers in executive decision-making roles for dynamics to begin to change. The Hollywood film industry will only start to change when executives realize diversity is essential to success.

The number of minorities in off-screen roles (writers, directors, producers) must increase. This will allow different stories to be told and heard and society’s perception of minority groups to change. Furthermore, this will lead to an increase in racially diverse characters and improve the accuracy of these characters’ personalities and stories. Of course, white storytellers will continue to play a significant role in creating Hollywood movies. Still, to ensure accurate portrayals of racial minorities, they must not only hire more minority actors but ask for advice and support from storytellers that can provide information on how to present accurate representations of minority groups in Hollywood films. This should help beat the excuse of implicit bias so frequently used.

The significance of film critics must also be recognized. By using their platform to point out disparities in representation, the media industry will have to create change as their reputations rely on film critics’ opinions and judgments.

Finally, people of color must not be discouraged from using their talent to pursue their dreams. Opportunities are available, and the culture of the Hollywood film industry will only begin to change when minority groups take over positions that whites have dominated for too long.

Hollywood Presbyterian Information Security Breach

Analysis of a Recent Information Security Breach

Electronic records and enterprise information, in general, are prone to security breaches. Reports of information security breaches are made almost in all places and by both institutions and individuals. Of particular concern are the alarming rates of medical information security breaches. For instance, the monthly average of attacks on medical records is estimated to be above 780,000 in the US alone (Greene, 2016).

This essay analyzes an information security breach at Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center (based in Los Angeles), which took place in February of 2016.

The media overall description of the information security breach

The media described the Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Centre information breach as one of the most severe cases. The hospital staff detected a malware outbreak that resulted in the hospital management declaring an “internal emergency”. The outbreak was reported to have begun on February 5, 2016. However, reports claimed that the hospital did not give information on how the attack occurred.

The hospital computer files, including patient records, were reported to be completely inaccessible. The system malfunction was reported to have lasted for more than one week. During the breakdown, employees were compelled to carry out most of their activities by hand. A considerable number of patients were transferred to other hospitals since some of the hospital facilities like the radiation and oncology departments had suspended their services.

The attackers’ demands were outrageous, as they wanted to be given 9,000 bitcoins (an untraceable mode of online payment), whose value is more than $3.5 million. The hospital’s CEO, Allen Stefanek, was quoted saying that the quickest and most efficient way that the hospital would get the key to unlocking the encryption was through paying the attackers. The hospital management, however, refuted the claims that the demands amounted to 9,000 bitcoins, rather issuing reports that it only paid approximately $17,000 or 40 bitcoins to the attackers to unlock the encrypted information (Schwartz, 2016).

The nature of the malware that resulted in the security breach

The information security breach at the center resulted from a ransomware (malware) attack. Ransomware has developed over time posing more threats to information security. Currently, the malware has upgraded to “Version 4.0”. Ransomware scrambles files in a computer and holds the information “hostage” until the attackers are paid a “ransom” to release them. The malware uses encryptions to deter computer users from accessing their files. A victim of such an attack only views a message informing them who has encrypted the information. In the message, attackers make their demands (payment in bitcoins) to the victim for the release of the key to unlocking the encrypted information.

The vulnerability that was exploited to lead to the breach

Although the hospital did not give clear information on how the attack occurred, it is evident that the hospital information system was vulnerable to external attacks. Reports were made linking the malware to possible phishing. Phishing is a technique used by attackers to drive the malware into the system of an unsuspecting user. There are possibilities that an employee might have clicked a malware link on an email or have opened a file containing the malware.

Another possible way that could have exposed the hospital to the breach is the use of credentials. In most cases, attackers pose as legit IT staff and send emails to unsuspecting users. The emails require the employees to fill in their credentials creating loopholes for the attackers to connect to the system of an enterprise by moving to file servers and domain controllers.

It is also evident that the hospital lacked a proper backup system of files and patient records. Otherwise, it would have been easy to restore normalcy once the information was encrypted.

The hospital architecture affected by the malware attack

The malware attack affected all the hospital’s computers. All the patients’ records and computer files were locked up and access was denied. The breakdown went on for more than one week leading to a temporary closure of the radiation and oncology department. Most of the work could only be done by hand.

Responses that the hospital could take to strengthen the architecture to prevent future similar attacks

The Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center software and all operating systems should always be covered and strengthened. Malware delivery depends on loopholes, especially when computers and other electronic information storage gadgets are not properly protected (Ducklin, 2016).

As such, hospital architecture should employ effective on-access antiviruses that are regularly updated. Research has revealed that properly used antivirus can block and prevent ransomware attacks (McGee, 2016). Oftentimes, ransomware is delivered using an existing and active malware in unprotected gadgets and computers.

All data handlers and employees, in general, should be advised to avoid all unsolicited or unexpected attachments since ransomware is oftentimes packaged into files and emails.

Cyber threats are increasingly becoming more and more sophisticated and, therefore, the hospital should constantly carry security risk assessments, which experts have recommended for optimal preparedness (McGee, 2016).

Lastly, it is recommended that Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center should make regular backups of their databases, keeping some recent backup offline to enhance information retrieval in case of similar attacks in the future.

References

Ducklin, P. (2016). . Web.

Greene, S. (2016). . Evidence Solutions. Web.

McGee, M. K. (2016). . Data Breach Today. Web.

Schwartz, M. J. (2016). . Healthcare Info Security. Web.

Hollywood Community Profile: Audience/Stakeholders

Introduction

This paper will address the community profile of Hollywood, Florida. According to HomeTownLocator.com., Hollywood city came into existence in 1925. It has experienced rapid growth and it is ranked number twelve in Florida. Hollywood is inhabited by almost all the major groups of persons found in the US. Hollywood has a distinct cultural identity. It is a historical site of major movie studios in the United States (United States Census Bureau, 2013).

Audience and Stakeholders

Analysis of this stated profile revealed several points of view of the intended audience/stakeholders. They are discussed in the succeeding paragraphs.

The first view of the intended audience/stakeholders in Hollywood is that it is a nice place to live in. The information on the website displays Hollywood as a diversified city with people from all races living together peacefully (Stuart, Sarow & Sturart, 2007). The available schools, social amenities, hospitals, business opportunities, apartments for sale and other information displayed on this profile reveals to the reader the peaceful and calm nature of Hollywood. Hollywood is displayed as a city full of opportunities for success (Stacey, 2012).

The second view of the intended audience/stakeholders in Hollywood is that it is a city where its settlers work together in harmony. The display of several community organizations and the low crime levels support this view (Stacey, 2012).

The third view of the intended audience/stakeholders is that Hollywood settlers take good care of their environment. Several agencies are available on the profile. They ensure that there is up to date information on environmental issues (Stacey, 2012).

The fourth view of the intended audience/stakeholders is that Hollywood is a great tourist attraction site. The presence of magnificent hotels, camping grounds, physical features, cultural features, historical features, and a nice way of welcoming residents all publicize Hollywood as a tourist destination (Stacey, 2012).

Audience and Stakeholders Analysis

The following section will adequately explore the audience/stakeholders.

A demographic analysis of the Hollywood community reveals the cosmopolitan nature of the city. The largest groups of people that occupy Hollywood include the whites and the Hispanics. They are about 73% of the total Hollywood settlers. Hispanics account for about 26% of the population. African Americans take about 17% of the population. The Asians are about 2.4% and the natives who include the Islanders and Native Hawaiians are less than one percent of the population. A mixture of other races constitute about 4.5% of the population (United States Census Bureau, 2013).

A geographic analysis of the Hollywood community reveals that there are vast available resources that are not constrained by the small population. Hollywood is located in Broward County in the southern region. It borders the Atlantic ocean. The city’s population is approximated to be about 142,622 people according to the census carried out in 2010. The population density of Hollywood is about 5,211.65 persons per square mile (United States Census Bureau, 2013). The major geographical features in Hollywood are Fort Lauderdale, Davie, Pembroke Pines, Dania Beach, Cooper City, Miramar, Hallandale Beach, and West Park. The climatic condition of Hollywood is Tropical monsoon, with mild winters and humid summers (Stacey, 2012).

A psychographic analysis of the Hollywood community reveals it as a city of 24 hours fun activities. It is dominated by the film industry as the major income generating project. This has led to the city being home to many celebrities in the United States. Most of the settlers of Hollywood are middle class to high-income earners (Stacey, 2012). The latter are quite wealthy especially along the coastline. Hollywood records high levels of drug abuse. There are increasing instances of hard drugs and illegal substance use in Hollywood.

A sociographic analysis of the Hollywood community reveals that most of its settlers are social. They like fun and will often be found on the beach or in clubs most of the times. The most influential activity in Hollywood is movie production (Stacey, 2012). Every individual destined to Hollywood dreams of becoming a movie actor.

A webographic analysis of the Hollywood community reveals that most of its settlers use the internet. They order almost everything online (Stacey, 2012).

Message Improvement

There are two ways that the profile message can be improved. They are discussed in the following section. The first way that the profile message can be improved is by use of local references in the profile. The second way that the profile message can be improved is through inclusions of the community’s major concerns.

Improvement Justification

There are several reasons why the above suggestions can be used to improve the profile message. They are discussed in the succeeding paragraphs.

The first reason is that the inclusion of direct references in the profile will offer fast-hand information on the situation on the ground thereby enhancing the profile. This will help the targeted groups to understand the message being passed by the profile (FAO Corporate Document Repository, 2012).

The second reason is that the inclusion of community concerns in the profile will help the targeted groups to help in addressing the prevailing concerns. These concerns can either be political or social (FAO Corporate Document Repository, 2012).

The third reason is that the profile’s intention is to communicate the situation being faced by a community. Hence, the inclusion of concerns and the use of references from the community will make this to be credible (Stuart, Sarow & Sturart, 2007).

References

FAO Corporate Document Repository (2012).. Web.

Stacey, J. (2012). Unhitched: Love, Marriage, and Family Values from West Hollywood to Western China: NYU Series in Social and Cultural Analysis. New York, NY: NYU Press.

Stuart, B., Sarow, M. & Sturart, L. (2007). Integrated business communication: In a global marketplace., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

United States Census Bureau (2013). Hollywood (city), Florida. Web.

The Impact of Tyler Perry on the Hollywood Industry

Introduction

Hollywood industry has been playing a significant role in global film production since the beginning of the 20th century. There are many talented professionals in Hollywood who create exciting, engaging, and impressive films. One of them is Tyler Perry, an American actor and producer, who became one of the highest-paid professionals in Hollywood. Perry is a unique and important figure in the film industry because his projects aim not only to entertain, but also to raise topical issues of human beings. Thus, in his works, he discusses the issues that are mostly faced by black people, such as perspectives on race, class, and black authenticity. He also raises the questions of gender, religion, and spirituality. All these themes are topical for all generations, which is why his works are especially valuable in the Hollywood industry. In this paper, the answer to the question of why Tyler Perry is an important figure in the film industry will be included. In addition, the information about what distinguishes him from other black directors will be discussed.

Main body

Indeed, the projects of Tyler Perry are unique as it is difficult to find another producer or director who can intertwine all the mentioned themes within their works. Through his works, he managed to transfer many important ideas to society. Thus, he shaped and reinforced Black cultural identity, described Black cultural life, emphasized gender roles in Black families, and depicted class and religion in the Black communities (Jackson and Bell 8). Being a talented person, Perry could include a lot of important information in his works, highlighting the most crucial ideas, which made his plays and films very popular among people.

What distinguishes Perry’s projects from the works of other black directors is that his films and plays are especially popular among black females, as they represent the target audience of the producer. Thus, Timothy Lyle examines Perry’s dramaturgy and asserts that a special connection between his productions and black women is ensured by Perry’s feminist advocacy (943). Indeed, one of his most famous works is about Madea, an elderly black woman who is always landing herself in a court for small violations. She tends to overreact when even a small and insignificant thing happens in her life. However, when someone is in a trouble, she is ready to help everyone around her.

Using this unusual and controversial method of representing a protagonist, Perry demonstrates the true nature of black women. He explains the meaning of feminist spaces and motherhood and highlights the importance of self-sufficiency and self-definition for women. Also, Perry shows how black women overcome their crises and deal with conservative gender ideologies and patriarchal constructions of society (Carey 999). Even though it might seem that nowadays these issues are not topical anymore, in fact, many women still face these problems. Attending Perry’s plays and watching his movies help females to understand how to deal with the difficulties they experience.

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that Tyler Perry is an important figure in the Hollywood industry, because he managed to raise a lot of topical questions in his films. His works are different from the projects of other black directors because he discusses specific issues and ideas that are especially crucial for Black females. The fact that the ideas he describes in his plays and films are topical for all generations further ensures their popularity.

References

  1. Carey, Tamika. “Take Your Place: Rhetorical Healing and Black Womanhood in Tyler Perry’s Films.” Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 39, no. 4, 2014, pp. 999-1021.
  2. Jackson, Ronald, and Jamel Bell. Interpreting Tyler Perry: Perspectives on race, Class, Gender, and Sexuality. Edited by Jamel S. C. Bell and Ronald l. Jackson II, Routledge, 2014.
  3. Lyle, Timothy. “Check With Yo’ Man First; Check With Yo’ Man”: Tyler Perry Appropriates Drag as a Tool to Re-Circulate Patriarchal Ideology.” Callaloo, vol. 34, no. 3, 2011, pp. 943-958.

Stereotypical Depiction of Muslims in Hollywood

The Arabs seem to be the most insulted group in the history of Hollywood. They are depicted in movies mainly as subhuman. The term “subhuman” was used by the Nazis to denigrate Gypsies as well as other minorities. Such depiction has been around for more than a hundred years. Even places of worship have become sites for the expression of hatred and exclusion. In addition, elected officials and policymakers legitimize the differential treatment of Arabs and Muslims (Bahdi, 2019). These discriminatory experiences can be frequently based on the stereotypes gained from Hollywood films. This paper is intended to reflect on the issue of how those stereotypes eliminate, dishonor, and overburden Muslims in the USA and Canada.

Increasingly growing social science studies documented the ways in which Muslims are portrayed as violent people (Sandefur, 2015). The studies show images of Arabs and Muslims in the Hollywood contexture both declarative and constitutive of this trope (Sandefur, 2015). Men from these communities are depicted as driven to conflict with the West, terrorists, dictatorial and violent fathers and husbands, and, occasionally, rapists of white women (Badhi, 2019).

Hollywood almost always portrays characters from the Middle East in the context of evil, despite the latter being often immigrants and having to adjust to the new social structures in Northern America (Bauder & Shields, 2015). Therefore, the findings from the studies mentioned above have demonstrated that Muslim women can be depicted merely as mothers who give birth to terrorists.

A Fathers’ Day cartoon exemplifies the stereotypes of Arabs and Muslims mentioned above. The cartoon depicts an Arab man with exaggerated features and dresses gleefully receiving a Fathers’ Day gift (Kassam, 2018). A child gazes, mesmerized, at the father who is proudly showing off his Father’s Day gift: sticks of explosives lashed together on a belt. The capital letters D-A-D-D-Y appear on several of the sticks of explosives worn by the want-to-be suicide bomber father. The card that reads “Happy Father’s Day” turns out to be on the floor.

The cartoon posits Arabs as inherently inimical to Western values. The explosive belt gifted from child to father is a perversion of Father’s Day in North America, which is intended to celebrate love and gratitude (Badhi, 2019). The Arabs in this cartoon pass on a different set of values: their families are formed to breed violence and hate. However, the reality is that the majority of Muslims are non-violent refugees that would seek shelter and support in other countries that would not prosecute them (Friesen, 2017; Amin-Khan, 2015).

The English script and the Fathers’ Day theme suggest that whatever evil the family plans to propagate, they will do so in Canada (Badhi, 2019). The child is happily showing his own propensity for violence at a very early age and conveys the impression that he is thoughtlessly destined to follow in the footsteps of his immoral father. The father’s eyes are wild, suggesting his untethered delight at receiving (and giving) the gift of violence.

Overall, the basis of this study demonstrates the need for greater awareness and education among legal professionals of the three common Arab and Muslim stereotypes, so that they can better recognize and analyze stereotyping experiences. The social science literature and reports by community organizations conclusively demonstrate that Arabs and Muslims face plenty of stereotypes, despite Canada’s commitment to equality. Lawyers who argue cases for their clients, human rights commissions, legal support centers, and reviewing courts, including the Supreme Court of Canada and the US, can all help advance stereotype literacy. Some members of marginalized communities avoid the legal system because they know too much about the system’s ability and willingness to hear and understand them.

References

Amin-Khan, T. (2015). Security and its impact on migrants and refugees. In H. Bauder & J. Shields (Eds.), Immigration, integration and the settlement experience in North America (pp. 118-143). Canadian Scholar’s Press.

Bahdi, R. (2019). All Arabs Are Liars: Arab and Muslim stereotypes in Canadian human rights law. University of Windsor.

Bauder, H., & Shields, J. (2015). Immigrant experiences in North America. Canadian Scholar’s Press Inc.

Friesen, J. (2017). Syrian exodus to Canada: One year later, a look at who the refugees are and where they went. The Globe and Mail. Web.

Kassam, S. (2018). Standing on guard for thee: The Acceptable Muslim and boundaries of racialized inclusion in Canada. University of Toronto.

Sandefur, R. (2015). Bridging the gap: Rethinking outreach for greater access to justice. Little Rock Law Review, 37(4). Web.

Priyanka Chopra in Hollywood: Discussion

The world of cinema is diverse and attractive to many viewers, but from the stars, it is often harsh and unfriendly. Anything can play a significant role, even skin color and race, as in the case of some actors. Indian actress Priyanka Chopra has achieved considerable success in Bollywood, but when she decided to conquer Hollywood, she realized that she needed to start all over again. She faced a lot of contradictions that were directly related to her race and skin color. Although Priyanka Chopra achieved success in Hollywood, she still had to face various obstacles based on preconceived opinions about skin color.

Race as an arbitrary construct means the presence of any innate traits passed down from generation to generation. These natural traits are unique to each race and determine society’s attitude toward a particular ethnicity. Chopra is proud of many of her works in films, but most of all, she is glad that she took part in filming the movie White Tiger, the cast of which was entirely Indian. Chopra said: “The white tiger is what I’m so excited about” (DUK Editor Team, 2021). She is proud of her race, and the fact that there are some biases about skin color in the film industry is strange and alien to her.

Although Priyanka Chopra achieved success, she was still dissatisfied that the modern film industry had not yet reached high development. Chopra claims that she was the first South Asian to achieve success, and this demonstrates that diversity in the industry has not yet reached the level of development that is needed (Harris, 2021). Some people still cannot perceive actors of other races as they perceive whites. The actress participated in various films and other entertainment programs to instill a standard perception of South Asian people (IANS, 2021). Priyanka Chopra started something that had not been considered so actively before so that people would equally positively perceive the talents of all actors and eliminate bias in themselves.

In conclusion, the world of the film industry is quite harsh towards actors of different races. Skin color can play a significant role in the actors’ choices and how the audience will react to the film. Priyanka Chopra is one of the first South Asian actresses who began to actively promote the fact that there should be people of different races and nationalities in cinema.

References

DUK Editor Team. (2021). Priyanka Chopra discusses lack of lead Hollywood roles for South Asian women. DUK News. Web.

Harris, N. (2021). Daily Mail. Web.

IANS. (2021). The Free Press Journal. Web.

How Sushi Went Global and Why Hollywood Rules the World

The article How Sushi Went Global by Theodore C. Bestor explores the phenomenon of the sushi boom that occurred in the United States and the world, in general, in 1970th. Such growth in popularity of Japanese food and culture was explained by the fact that more people started thinking about leading a healthier life and replacing red meat with fish, rice, and vegetables. The Japanese way of life and food preparation appealed to many people, and from the local dish, sushi became a symbol of Japanese culture that is famous all around the globe.

Sushi expansion caused the growing demand for tuna for sushi and sashimi making. Though in 1970th, Japan remained the leading producer of the raw fish that is used during the process of sushi preparation, tuna-producing farms appeared in many countries, including Spain, New England, and Canada. Though the workers there were not Japanese people, the majority of the technologies used in these farms came from Japan. At the same time, the sushi boom was influenced by the globalization process that made Japanese culture and cuisine even more recognizable. Moreover, sushi gained such popularity that it even made the owners of Chinese or Vietnamese restaurants change their course towards Japanese cuisine in order to get more profit and new clientele.

After sushi was recognized globally, Japanese people created a whole industry to teach sushi chefs and other workers relating to the global sushi business. However, sushi is currently associated not only with the Japanese but the Asian culture in general since people from Korea, China, Vietnam, and other countries run sushi restaurants all over the world. However, Japan still remains the core of the sushi industry and sets trends for other countries to follow.

The article Why Hollywood Rules the World by Tyler Cowen concerns the most influential movie producing area of all times and its influence on the movie-making industry and the world in general. Since cinema is one of the hardest spheres for globalization due to the complication of the process of movie-making, it is hard to outperform Hollywood who remains the leader in the field. Unlike other movie production companies, Hollywood is more susceptible to globalization due to its orientation on the wide range of viewers. Hollywood movies are designed not only for the American audience but for audiences all over the world.

The author states that unlike Hollywood producers and directors, who perceive the movies as handmaidens for the theatrical markets, European movie-makers regard television revenues as a substitute for the theatrical ones. That is why Hollywood films have such an enormous success, as they rely on the advanced publicity that is usually launched before a film is officially released. European films, in contrast, are designed to be placed on the TV, and that is why they do not often meet theatrical success.

Apart from that, Hollywood movie-makers learned to meet consumers’ demands in a global sense what makes its movies interesting for people outside the American culture. In addition, Hollywood studios pay attention to such aspects as the commercial success of the film and refuse to work with those that have lower chances of obtaining it. However, it is wrong to say that Hollywood studios contribute to American cultural imperialism since a lot of directors and actors are non-American by birth. Hence, when speaking about Hollywood, it is better to regard it as a universal movie-making industry that is based on American ethos.