Category: Heroism

Is Odysseus a true hero as popular opinion would have us believe, due to the crucial role he played in winning the Trojan War and returning home to his kingdom, Ithaca? Or is he a self-serving leader with numerous faults?

In Homer’s ‘The Odyssey’, Odysseus is portrayed as a hero, but, when one examines his quest, actions, deeds, and various peer commentaries, it is easy to unmask the numerous flaws that he actually has. After playing a pivotal role in the Trojan War, Odysseus travelled the globe, experienced horrors most humans could never imagine, and finally returned home safely. He is exemplified in this book as a true hero who can overcome what most would consider insurmountable. Contrary to these traits, many of his actions deem him unworthy of receiving the label of a hero. Throughout his journey, he brazenly sacrifices his men and often places the value of his own life above his comrades. We are witness to this when Odysseus sees smoke coming from an island and proclaims, “I’d go back to the shore and the swift ship first, feed the men, then send them out for scouting” (Homer, 235). A genuine hero would never even consider placing his well-being above that of his men. Characters who encounter Odysseus throughout his quest describe him in many different ways. On Aeolian Island, when he receives a bag of wind, his crew suspects that it is actually a bag of gold. Even though this is not the case, his friends never trusted him from the beginning, which leads readers to believe that something happened in the past that caused this distrust. When Odysseus reaches Phaeacia and is about to sail for home, the bard sings of how heroic Odysseus is and how the whole island worships him immensely.

‘The Odyssey’ by Homer displays both his heroic and unheroic side, ‘Ulysses’ by Tennyson portrays him as trying to accomplish heroism, and ‘Ulysses and the Siren’ by Daniel presents his heroicness as simply an underlying attempt to gain glory. Odysseus’ deeds, actions, and thoughts make readers believe that he truly deserves to be known as a hero in ‘Ulysses’ by Alfred Tennyson. In this poem, Odysseus has finished his quest and finally returned home. Written from Odysseus’ point of view, it portrays his feeling that his life is over because his journey has finally ended. He insists that he will make the most of his short time left when he says: “I will drink/ life to the Lee’s” (Tennyson, 6-7). When Odysseus claims that it is “For some three suns to store and hoard myself” (Tennyson, 29), readers can see how Odysseus detested being confined to his kingdom after traveling and experiencing the world. Even though Odysseus yearned to go home while facing great horrors, once he arrived in Ithaca, he desired the thrill of exploration and adventure. He declares that although he and his old crew are now old, they still have the ability to do something noble and honorable before “the long day wanes” (Tennyson, 55). He encourages them to make use of their old age because “’T is not too late to seek a newer world” (Tennyson, 57). In these speeches, we can see that he is acting as a hero should and that the true character trait has never left him. Even in his final days after returning from a journey filled with unspeakable horrors, he still believes there should be no end to exploration, and through this, the readers believe that he is a true leader with noble ambitions.

In the poem ‘Ulysses and the Siren’ by Samuel Daniel, readers are led to believe that Odysseus’ heroicness is built on the desire to achieve fame and honor. In the middle of his journey, a siren tries to lure him in and tells him that he can live a peaceful life without worries and escape the dangerous seas by living with her. Odysseus replies: “Fair nymph, if fame or honor were/ To be attained with ease/ Then would I come and rest me there” (Daniel, 9-11). Even though Odysseus is acting very noble by turning down this tempting opportunity, he does so because of his desire to achieve glory and fame. If he was not set on this goal, he probably would have accepted the siren’s offer. Odysseus claims that “To spend the time luxuriously/ Becomes not men of worth” (Daniel, 15-16), in which it is clear to see that he does not want to help the world to become a better place, or save many people – he just wants glory. This perspective of Odysseus contrasts greatly to the viewpoint that is portrayed in ‘Ulysses’. In ‘Ulysses and the Siren’, Odysseus is shown to be a selfish man who is striving to be a hero only for the sake of glory and fame, while in ‘Ulysses’, Odysseus is shown as a man who is determined to defy age and death, to explore the world, and accomplish an act of heroism in his old age.

These three poems all present a different angle on Odysseus’ heroism. One depicting a heroic and flawed character, another seeking to accomplish heroism, and one attempting to achieve glory. Both of these poetic portrayals have similarities to ‘The Odyssey’ by Homer. ‘The Odyssey’ displays Odysseus as heroic in some parts, but also displaying a lack of respect by some of his comrades and flaws in many of his actions. Both of these traits – heroic and flawed – are described in detail in the poems. Daniel paints a more compelling picture of Odysseus because it is interesting to see him portrayed as a non-hero. When most talk about Odysseus they envision a hero, but Daniel depicts him as doing everything he did only to get the fame that comes with it.

Reading about Odysseus through these three different lenses, with one of them being a new and undiscovered side, really allows the reader to analyze what Odysseus was truly like, instead of merely being told what to think.

In ‘The Iliad’, Homer explained that various characters displayed traits of heroism. A hero is a person who puts their life up for the greater good of other people. They also, could be a person who you would look up to as role model for yourself. The characteristics that various gods displayed in ‘The Iliad’ by Homer were honor and pride. These characteristics were displayed through the characters of Hector and Achilles. It is important for heroes to have these very strong characteristics to show they deserve to be truly called a ‘hero’. The term ‘hero’ is a very deserving term that has to be proven and those two characters displayed elite status to receive the title of a ‘hero’.

In ‘The Iliad’, both Hector and Achilles both displayed honor in various ways. In Book 6, Hector emphasizes the things that will be said about himself and about Ajax the Great that displayed in honor. Homer states: “First they fought with heart-devouring, then they parted, bound by pacts of friendship” (Homer, Book 6, Line 344-348). It shows that they will be recognized by the exchange of gifts for their duties in the war. Their honor and determination led them to be rewarded for their duties, which bought joy to others. In Book 1, Achilles emphasizes the point of honor after Agamemnon insults his honor in relation to Agamemnon’s thoughts of the women by stating: “I am minded no longer to stay here dishonored and pile up your wealth and luxury” (Homer, Book 1, Line 170). This quote explains that he left the main camp to save his glory, which then leads him to save his honor off the battlefield. In ‘The Iliad’ by Homer, heroism is displayed within Achilles and Hector through their distinguished honor.

Pride was displayed by both characters Achilles and Hector within Homer’s poem. In Book 1, Achilles pride was tampered by Agamemnon due him having his prize taken from him which was a woman. Homer states: “‘…And now my prize you threaten in person to strip from me…’ Achilles decides” (Homer, Book 1, Line 169-170). This quote explains that situation then led to him replacing the women with Briseis. Due to him replacing the prize with Briseis he was very upset, which affected his pride since the entire situation occurred in front of the other warriors. In Book 22, Hector’s pride is very high and mighty. He then listens to the advice, which then leads him to be in a very bad situation. Homer states: “I would not obey him, but that would have been far better. Now, since by my own recklessness I have ruined my people, I feel shame before the Trojans and the Trojan women with trailing robes, that someone who is less of a man than I will say of me: ‘Hector believed in his own strength and ruined his people”” (Homer, Book 22, Line 102-107). This also leads him to being afraid of being told ‘I told you so’ by Polydomous and ruined his spirit. Both characters show all the elements of what can occur when your pride is tested, you just must know how to handle things, which will then show how much of a true hero you are.

In ‘The Iliad’ by Homer, heroism is a constant theme that occurs. The characteristics that are shown by Hector and Achilles are honor and pride. To show you are truly a hero, you need to show characteristics that stand out from normal personality traits. The term ‘hero’ is used to describe a person or people with very strong leadership traits. Within Homer’s poem, both Achilles and Hector showed that they are the true definitions of what a hero entails.

From Superman to Peter pan, from Marvel to Disney, from comic books to movies… we live in a modern, evolving world, where heroes are imagined as having incredible powers, amazing tales and the ability to incinerate danger. However, the idea of a ‘true hero’ stems much deeper than superficial, fictional characters. Demonstrating qualities such as determination, compassion, honesty, sacrifice and humility, a hero can be born in the most unlikely of people. They may not necessarily rescue the ‘damsel in distress’, but will go above and beyond, selflessly doing everything in their power to achieve justice and do what it right. It comes as no surprise that the name of Jesus Christ, commonly deemed the hero of the Catholic religion, is brought to the forefront when this topic is discussed. For Christians and non-Christians alike, he was a revolutionary with an unparalleled effect on culture around the world as we know it. Even Martin Luther King Jr, renowned American civil rights leader stated: “Jesus Christ was an extremist for love, truth and goodness” (Smart and Relentless, 2015). Displaying the qualities of sacrifice, humility and compassion, Jesus was a spiritual leader like no other. The reach of his influence was unbound, touching the lives of people all around the world and shaping a legacy that is honored centuries later. This proves, that he, above all, deserves the title of hero.

The enduring power of Jesus’s heroism is displayed through his sacrifice. One of the single most famous symbols of all time, recognized by Christians and non-Christians alike, is the image of Jesus nailed to a cross. Such symbolism, metaphorical meaning and history is present in the portrayal of that figure… a universal representation of sacrifice. As famous Australian Actor Mel Gibson states, “When you look at the reasons why Christ came, why He was crucified – He died for all mankind, He suffered for all mankind” (Jesus Central, n.d). Jesus completed a heroic act like no other when he sacrificed himself and died on the cross to save us all. For all the goodness that he tried to evoke, for all the lessons and teachings that he tried to provide during his time on Earth, Jesus was met with criticism, contradiction and condemnation. As the Gospel of Matthew outlines, Jesus was mocked and humiliated by the very soldiers who were sent to crucify him. “The governor’s soldiers took Jesus… twisted together a crown of thorns and set it on his head. Then they knelt in front of him and mocked him. ‘Hail, king of the Jews!’ they said” (Matthew 27: 27-30). However, Jesus took the beatings, endured the pain and suffering, and ultimately drew his last breath, knowing that his legacy would inspire a better world. He did this for even those who didn’t follow, respect or believe in him, giving humanity in its entirety a chance to repent of its sins. The fact that his name is still worshipped thousands of years later, only seeks to show how powerful and profound his selfless act was. In fact, Jesus’s death was largely responsible for the formation of the Christian faith. Good Friday, the day of his crucifixion, is remembered all around the world, where we reflect on the heroic nature of Jesus. As John 15:13 provides, “Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends”. Jesus had such a strong faith in the goodness of humanity and in the children of God, that he put the needs of others before his own. Doing this in the face of adversity, even for those who were against him, portrays the true heroism of Jesus.

It was also the compassion of Jesus that made him a hero. Jesus reached out to the ‘outcasts’ of his time – people with sickness and disease, even blindness, who were shunned from society and deemed as ‘cursed’ or ‘unclean’. By association, helping these outsiders meant that Jesus himself suffered adversity. However, as a true hero would, he fought tirelessly to extend his hand to those in need, recognizing that all of humanity, regardless of social status or wealth, deserved the same level of care and compassion. The Bible is filled with stories of Jesus’s miraculous healing powers – ranging from fever to paralysis to deafness and dumbness. However, one example, particularly significant, was the healing of a blind man on the Sabbath (John 9: 1-41). This was a story of a blind beggar who called to Jesus to have pity on him. While the other bystanders overlooked him, Jesus simply said: “While I am in the world, I am the light of the world” (John 9: 5). He then spat on the ground, made some paste with the saliva, and put it on the man’s eyes. Upon washing it off, the beggar could see. This was an incredible feat, an unexplainable miracle that exemplified Jesus’s compassion and empathy. He had a divine understanding of equality and through his miracles, tried to communicate the power of human dignity, regardless of social hierarchy, health or ability. Through using his gifts to heal others, help others and bring about positive social change, Jesus proved that he rightly deserves the title of ‘hero’.

It was also the humility of Jesus enabled him to be a pure and honest hero. Often with power comes corruption. As a leader, Jesus never let power distract his attention from inspiring righteousness. He always had a modest, humble view of his importance and sought to inspire others through servant leadership. This meant that it was natural for him to put others first, to help and serve, rather than being consumed by pride or self-importance. The humility and servanthood of Jesus is represented in the Bible, John 13, when Jesus washed the feet of his disciples during the last supper. Often, in old tradition, a servant would wash the feet of the guests, particularly before a meal. Therefore, Jesus’ act was that of a servant, shocking disciples with his humility. Once he was finished, he stated: “I have set you an example that you should do as I have done for you. Very truly I tell you, no servant is greater than his master, nor is a messenger greater than the one who sent him” (John 13: 15-17). This quote displays Jesus’ humility, where through his teaching, he would nurture good will and patiently show his disciples how to spread his message of love and selflessness. Jesus epitomized the message: ‘A true hero recognizes the rights of others’. To lead without commanding, to gain followers without fear, to become a hero without pride. That was the legacy Jesus left… still revered today in the twenty-first century by both Christians and non-Christians alike, showing the power in his actions and the heroism in his deeds.

Mother Theresa, an iconic peace figure, once said: “Christ, who being rich became poor and emptied Himself to work out our redemption, calls us: to share in His poverty so that we might become rich” (Jesus Central, n.d). Jesus guided his teachings through servant leadership… exhibiting compassion, sacrifice and humility. These ideologies enabled him to be a kind, honest and pure leader, a hero and inspiration for those who knew of him and those who learnt of his ways. Jesus left a legacy that continues to inspire and influence people universally, shaping the Christian tradition and influencing a humanitarian view amongst even those who do not follow a Christian faith. He may not wear a cape, mask or a shiny suit, but he was a hero in many more ways than movies or novels could depict. No greater sacrifice was made, no greater love shown and no greater teaching instilled than what Jesus accomplished. He was a hero – the greatest hero – and will be glorified for centuries to come. His heroism is etched into history for all time.

Bibliography

1. Smart and Relentless, 2015. “Find Out What These Famous History Makers Had to Say About Jesus”, https://smartandrelentless.com/find-out-what-these-famous-history-makers-had-to-say-about-jesus-christ/ (16/08/19).
2. Jesus Central, (n.d). “Famous People Describe Jesus”, https://www.jesuscentral.com/ji/life-of-jesus-modern/jesus-famous.php (18/08/19)

Introduction

Heroism, the act of selflessly risking one’s life or well-being to help others, has been revered and celebrated throughout human history. The concept of heroism raises the question of whether it is an innate trait within human nature or a learned behavior influenced by society. This essay will present a persuasive argument on the existence of heroism in human nature, highlighting inherent human qualities, historical examples, and psychological perspectives.

Innate Human Qualities

Human beings possess inherent qualities that lay the foundation for heroism. Empathy, compassion, and the capacity for self-sacrifice are integral aspects of human nature. These traits enable individuals to understand the suffering of others and motivate them to take action, even at great personal risk. Heroic acts, such as rescuing someone from danger or standing up against injustice, stem from these fundamental human qualities.

Historical Examples

Throughout history, numerous examples highlight the existence of heroism in human nature. From ancient legends to modern-day heroes, individuals have consistently demonstrated extraordinary bravery and selflessness. Stories of heroes like Mahatma Gandhi, Harriet Tubman, and Oskar Schindler illustrate how ordinary people can rise to extraordinary heights, displaying innate heroism in the face of adversity.

Evolutionary Perspective

Evolutionary psychologists argue that heroism can be traced back to the survival instincts ingrained in human beings. The human species has evolved in a way that values cooperation and protection of the group. Heroic acts can be seen as an extension of this innate drive to ensure the survival and well-being of the community. The willingness to put oneself in danger for the benefit of others can be viewed as a result of evolutionary processes that prioritize the collective over the individual.

Cultural and Societal Influence

While heroism may be inherent in human nature, its expression can be influenced by cultural and societal factors. Social norms, values, and role models play a significant role in shaping individuals’ behavior and defining what is considered heroic. Cultural narratives and media representation also contribute to the construction of heroic ideals. However, these influences do not diminish the existence of heroism in human nature; they simply shape how it is expressed and perceived within different societies.

Conclusion

The evidence strongly suggests that heroism is indeed an intrinsic aspect of human nature. Innate qualities such as empathy, compassion, and self-sacrifice form the foundation of heroism. Historical examples of heroic individuals from various cultures and time periods demonstrate that heroism is not limited to specific individuals or circumstances but is a universal trait that can emerge in response to extraordinary situations.

Moreover, an evolutionary perspective highlights the adaptive nature of heroism, as it serves the purpose of ensuring the survival and well-being of the collective. While cultural and societal factors shape the expression and perception of heroism, they do not negate its existence within human nature.

Recognizing and celebrating heroism in human nature can inspire individuals to cultivate these qualities within themselves and promote a more compassionate and courageous society. Encouraging acts of heroism and nurturing empathy and selflessness can contribute to the betterment of humanity as a whole.

In conclusion, heroism is a fundamental aspect of human nature. The innate qualities of empathy, compassion, and self-sacrifice, combined with historical examples and evolutionary perspectives, provide strong evidence for the existence of heroism within human beings. Embracing and nurturing these heroic qualities can lead to a more compassionate and courageous society, where individuals are inspired to act selflessly for the benefit of others.

Introduction

“Rikki-Tikki-Tavi” by Rudyard Kipling is a thrilling tale that follows the adventures of a brave and determined mongoose named Rikki-Tikki-Tavi. In this argumentative essay, we will explore the characteristics that define a true hero and argue that Rikki-Tikki-Tavi embodies the qualities of a heroic figure. By examining his bravery, loyalty, and unwavering commitment to protecting his adopted family, we will demonstrate that Rikki-Tikki-Tavi is the true hero of the story.

Bravery and Fearlessness

Rikki-Tikki-Tavi exhibits unwavering bravery throughout the story. From the moment he enters the garden of the bungalow, he fearlessly takes on the dangerous cobras, Nag and Nagaina. Despite being significantly smaller and outnumbered, Rikki-Tikki-Tavi confronts his adversaries with courage and determination.

His daring acts, such as fighting Nag in the bathroom and confronting Nagaina in her den, showcase his fearless nature. Rikki-Tikki-Tavi puts his own life at risk to protect his adopted family from the deadly cobras, proving that true heroes are willing to face danger head-on.

Loyalty and Dedication

Throughout the story, Rikki-Tikki-Tavi displays unwavering loyalty and dedication to his adopted family. He forms a deep bond with Teddy, the young boy who takes care of him, and sees himself as a protector of the family. Rikki-Tikki-Tavi’s loyalty is evident in his determination to eliminate the threat posed by Nag and Nagaina.

Despite the danger he faces, Rikki-Tikki-Tavi remains committed to his mission and never wavers in his loyalty to the family. His unwavering dedication highlights the selflessness of a true hero who puts the well-being of others above his own.

Intelligence and Resourcefulness

Rikki-Tikki-Tavi’s intelligence and resourcefulness are key factors in his heroic deeds. He carefully observes his surroundings, strategizes his attacks, and uses his wit to outsmart his adversaries. For example, he cleverly deceives Nagaina by convincing her that he poses a threat to her eggs, ultimately leading to her defeat.

Rikki-Tikki-Tavi’s ability to think quickly and adapt to various situations demonstrates the intelligence and resourcefulness necessary for a hero to overcome challenges. His quick thinking and strategic actions make him a formidable opponent to his enemies.

Protection and Sacrifice

The true heroism of Rikki-Tikki-Tavi lies in his willingness to protect his adopted family at all costs. He selflessly puts himself in harm’s way to ensure their safety, even when it means facing formidable enemies. Rikki-Tikki-Tavi’s commitment to protecting his loved ones is evident in his relentless pursuit of Nag and Nagaina, determined to eliminate any threat they pose.

Furthermore, Rikki-Tikki-Tavi’s willingness to sacrifice his own safety for the well-being of others is a testament to his heroic nature. He risks his life multiple times to ensure the safety and peace of mind of his adopted family, showcasing the ultimate act of selflessness.

Conclusion

In “Rikki-Tikki-Tavi,” Rudyard Kipling presents a heroic protagonist who embodies bravery, loyalty, intelligence, and selflessness. Rikki-Tikki-Tavi’s unwavering commitment to protecting his adopted family, his fearless confrontations with deadly cobras, and his resourcefulness in overcoming challenges make him the true hero of the story.

Through his actions and character traits, Rikki-Tikki-Tavi demonstrates the qualities that define a true hero: someone who faces adversity with courage, shows unwavering loyalty, utilizes intelligence and resourcefulness, and sacrifices personal safety for the greater good.

As readers, we are inspired by Rikki-Tikki-Tavi’s heroic journey and reminded of the importance of bravery, loyalty, and selflessness in our own lives. The story serves as a timeless reminder that true heroes can come in all shapes and sizes, and their actions can leave a lasting impact on those they protect.

Furthermore, the war was of great importance in that it completely altered the demographic of the disabled population in Britain: the returning veterans were fit, enfranchised men, previously comprising the most dependable portion of the citizenry. Indeed, 70% of amputees were less than 30 years of age. This demographic shift served to challenge prevailing conservative and eugenic conceptions of disability as a societal burden, associated with vulnerability and deficiency. In a reversal of previous perceptions, disability, albeit that of the symbolic figure of the ex-serviceman, came to signify the ‘supreme realization of Victorian expectations about manliness’. Losing a limb in warfare problematized the question of breeding for eugenicists, whose theories were prominent at the beginning of the twentieth century. Whilst previously, those with deformities, whom eugenicists perceived to be moral and physical degenerates, were dissuaded from having children to preserve the nation’s ‘racial qualities’, the material and psychological motivations of a ‘land fit for heroes’ heightened the impetus to ‘restore’ disabled veterans. Such men still had the desirable biological qualities required to enhance Britain’s racial stock, as their physical incapacities evinced strength and heroism, thus their progeny needed to be protected. Indeed, the Eugenics Society implored the state to provide ample financial benefits that would allow disabled ex-servicemen to keep pace with their ‘stay-at-home neighbors’ in the marriage market. Ultimately, as Bourke asserted, it was this change in the constitution of the disabled population ‘from passive to active sufferers that altered the entire language of disablement’. She argues that there was a marked cultural ‘movement from a language of childlike passivity’ associated with disability, citing the example of the Guild of the Brave Poor Things, which changed its name to the Guild of the Handicapped in 1916 to appeal more to wounded soldiers who understandably found the original name to be emasculating. Fundamentally, this constant accentuation of disabled veterans as heroes, with elevated civic worth, rendered conservative notions of disablement insupportable, thereby setting off the process of changing well-established public attitudes toward and culture’s treatment of physical disability.

Conversely, while the First World War was significant to cultural experiences and understandings of disability in the short term, perhaps it was less so in the long term, as memories of the conflict receded. A serious bone of contention in the historiography of disabled war veterans is the ‘turning away’ debate, wherein historians such as Bourke claimed that the early sentimentalization of the war-wounded eventually translated into indifference on the part of both the public and politicians. Several factors indeed coincided to make the disabled veterans’ cause less culturally visible over the years. Arguably, the fact that there were so many of them paradoxically contributed to their fading eminence in the public eye as the novelty wore off; in such extreme numbers, disabled men no longer aroused the guilt and sympathy they once had and were subjected to similar forms of neglect as the pre-existing civilian disabled. This, coupled with a desire to forget the war’s horrors, meant that disabled veterans were largely overlooked in commemorative practices, which centered on grief and the memorialization of the dead soldier hero, as opposed to the war’s surviving victims. Moreover, with the arrival of the severe economic depression in the mid-1920s, the call for healthy, young laborers supplanted the need to honor the less economically viable, war-mutilated bodies of veterans. Subsequently, as Bourke argued, ‘growing attention to the beautiful, molded male physique’ replaced earlier cultural representations of heroism as represented through disablement. In this sense, war was less significant to changing public perception of disability, because the later interwar years, in the wake of the recession, encouraged a return to attitudes of contempt toward physical impairment and admiration of the conventionally attractive, able-body.

Perhaps the most compelling reason suggesting that war was not so influential in altering attitudes toward disability is that it served to reinforce the notion that there are ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ classes of disabled people. There was a clear cultural distinction among different types of disability; for instance, blindness and amputation were considered worthier of support than ‘invisible’ disabilities. Moreover, the support and respect for those invalided out of the armed forces due to illness as opposed to injury was negligible; the Eugenics Education Society felt strongly that diseased veterans should not be awarded pensions at all. The war also served to extend the division between disabled ex-servicemen and the civilian disabled, as the rhetoric embraced those men who were ‘unnaturally abnormal’ and thereby the nation’s responsibility, whilst those disabled at birth or as a result of their working-class status continued to be blamed for their condition. That having been said, despite the valid argument that public recognition of war disability waned throughout the post-war years and that conflict-induced injuries further entrenched notions of ‘natural’ versus ‘unnatural’ abnormalities, it is undeniable that the war caused public exposure to disability issues on a greater scale than ever before, and cultural understandings of disability shifted as a result. Given the number of men returning from war disabled, most families across Britain would have had very personal experiences in confronting the harsh realities of physical disability. As such, the war indicated the beginnings of a transformation in perception of disability, from one that lay the blame on the individual, to one that accepted it as being a collective issue.

What if one could save hundreds of people, or permanently change the world in a good way, but they had to put their lives at risk or give up 10 years of their own life? Would they choose it? Or would they not? Heroes are when people make a good impact to one’s life or the world in some way, or they risk their lives to save someone. They never give up; the hero will try their best to reach their goals, even if it takes years.

To be a hero, one needs to be patient to achieve their goals. The individual needs to work hard but not be in a hurry to achieve their goal. One example of this is a historical hero named Harriet Tubman. Tubman’s goal was to save herself and hundreds of Africans from slavery. “She first encountered the Underground Railroad when she used it to escape slavery herself in 1849” (Biography). After she escaped, she made a plan by herself, to save Africans from slavery using the Underground Railroad she found in 1849. So, “between 1850 and 1860, Tubman made 19 trips from the South to the North following the network known as the Underground Railroad. She guided more than 300 people, including her parents and several siblings, from slavery to freedom” (Biography). This is a perfect example of a hero being patient, because Tubman worked for 10 years by herself to save more than 300 slaves and herself, she was patient and in no hurry. She worked hard and finally after 10 years, achieved her goal to save African Americans from slavery. This proves that being patient is a good heroic trait, because she saved more than 300 people with patience. Without this quality, Tubman probably would not have saved many slaves from slavery. The White Helmets are another good example that demonstrates a hero being patient. The White Helmet are a group of first responders who rescue victims of bombings that get trapped under broken down buildings or rubble. The White Helmets are ordinary people who has families and decided to work as a first responder in Syria. They only get 1 month of training and they save people. Even though the workers of the White Helmets are under a lot of pressure, they still have a lot of patience to save people under rubble. “Do you know the feeling that you get when you plant a small seed and it grows into a beautiful bush? That’s how we feel that this baby is still alive thanks to God and to our work. We feel very proud. I’ve learned many lessons from baby Mahmoud. Patience, persistence, hard work, and never to lose hope, no matter what happens, they will live” (Vialogue). The White Helmets learn a lot from each person that they save. “Since 2013, more than 130 White Helmets were killed, in the same period, they saved more than 58,000 lives” (Vialogue). This shows that being patient helps people under pressure, if the White Helmets weren’t patient and were nervous and anxious, they would not work properly because they might do something wrong; but with patience, the White Helmets saved tens of thousands of people.

Secondly, another trait you need to be a hero is, sacrifice. One would need to sacrifice his/her life and risk running into danger to save people. A group of heroes that demonstrate sacrifice is again, the White Helmets of Syria. The members of the White Helmets say things like “When I want to save someone’s life I don’t care if he’s and enemy or a friend. What concerns me is the soul that might die” (Viologue). The White Helmets are not the most experienced first responders, but as long as they can save people from Syria it does not matter if they are a friend or an enemy. They feel great about their jobs. One person from the White Helmets stated, “I’m willing to sacrifice my soul for the sake of the people. This job is sacred. I am just trying to do something for the people, and for my country”. Another person said, “It’s a hard feeling, that you are away from your family, but life requires sacrifice” (Viologue). The White Helmets are willing to sacrifice their lives to save enemies and their friends. Although it hurts them because they are away from their family, their life requires sacrifice. Over 130 White Helmets sacrificed their lives for 58,000 lives. The amount of lives saved, and the amount of lives sacrificed, is worth it. If the White Helmets did not sacrifice their own life, then the 58,000 people would not be here. Another great example of sacrifice is a historical hero named Rosa Parks. Her goal was to end all racism and to stop putting African Americans to the back of the bus. December 1st, 1955, Parks refused to give up her seat for a white man that needed to sit. “When the bus driver saw me still sitting, he asked if I was going to stand up, and I said, ‘No, I’m not’. And he said, ‘Well, if you don’t stand up, I’m going to have to call the police and have you arrested’. I said, ‘You may do that’” (Biography). Parks got arrested to teach the world that people with color should be treated equally. She sacrificed her own time in her life to end racism. If Parks stood up at December 1st, 1955, the whole world wouldn’t know about her and how she helped end racism.

Finally, the last trait a hero needs is persistence. An example of this is the Children’s March. Early in 1963, Birmingham, Alabama. Kids left school early without the teachers noticing, some as young as 7 and 8, got arrested and injured, this was because they were protesting and yelling about how African Americans needed to be treated equally. But the little kids were persistent, and they kept on working hard to end racism. “Segregation persisted throughout the city and blacks were allowed to go to many places like the fairgrounds only on “colored days”. The goal of the plan was to use tactics of non-violent protest to provoke Birmingham civic and business leaders to agree to desegregate” (Biography). When the Africans were shot with high pressured water hoses and thousands of kids got arrested, they didn’t retaliate with violence, they stayed happy and kept on protesting, even while in the police cars. But when they got released, they decided to continue protesting. The Children’s March helped end racism and without them, it might have taken longer to end all racism. Without persistence, the young protesters would have given up because they were tired or hurt. Another hero that represents this is a historical hero named, Martin Luther King Jr. He was a “Baptist minister and social activist who led the civil rights movement in the United States from the mid-1950s until his death by assassination in 1968” (Britannica). Despite the stabbing and doubts he got, MLK still persisted and continued to promote nonviolence and equality between races. On September 20, 1958, Izola Product Curry stabbed MLK in the chest with a 7inch blade, but he survived. The attempted murder only strengthened his dedication to advocate peacefulness between races. MLK wanted equality regardless the skin color. He continued to protest promoting peace and equality for everyone. He succeeded. “In 1964 MLK won the Nobel Peace Prize and Congress passed the Civil Rights Act that same year” (History). This law protects everyone to be treated with equality.

Have you ever wondered what a true hero is, or what characteristics make a true hero? A true hero is someone who exhibits all or most of the following qualities – bravery, courage, determination unconditional love. A true hero will beyond the call of duty to help someone in need. Heroes are courageous because they act even when they are afraid, they are selfless and act without concern for themselves, and they are determined to do what is right. The perfect definition is Jesus Christ, our Almighty Father, as he showed all the following traits of a hero throughout his everyday life. Jesus became a hero amongst all his people as he treated everyone equally, whether rich or poor, healthy or sick. Jesus lived to make others’ lives better by caring for them and helping them, no matter who they were. Below I will further describe why Jesus is my hero and what heroic actions and traits he illustrated throughout his everyday life.

Firstly, the most heroic action that Jesus is still known for to this day, is his courageous crucifixion on the cross for all his people. Jesus was bashed and beaten before his crucifixion, he suffered endlessly for his people to live happily. This sacrifice and bravery show that Jesus was not scared to stand up for his people, and was even willing to exchange his life to improve the living conditions of his people. This shows us that Jesus is a true hero as he shows the characteristics of a superhero, meaning he was willing to risk his life to save others.

Another quality that Jesus portrayed threw his everyday life is selflessness. This is a quality that refers to a person caring more about others around him than themselves. The Bible illustrates many times stories, psalms, and countless letters describing Jesus in a selfless way. An example of this is in Mark: 10-45, where it reads: “Even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many”. This shows the audience Jesus came not for his own benefit but for ours. He came to minister to us and die for us. The selflessness that Jesus displayed throughout his everyday life illustrates to us that he is a true hero as he valorizes all of the techniques of a true hero.

The final quality that Jesus illustrated throughout his everyday life is courage. This is a quality that refers to a person’s ability to do something that frightens them, but in Jesus’ case, it refers to doing something undesirable for the greater outcome of all of those in need of help. Within the Bible, Jesus faced many obstacles where he was required to show courage and bravery throughout. An example of this is in Matthew: 8, where Jesus heals a man with leprosy, the Bible verse reads: “Jesus reached out his hand and touched the man. ‘I am willing’, he said. ‘Be clean!’ Immediately he was cleansed of his leprosy”. Touching leppers was considered wrong at this time, but Jesus showed courage and healed the lepper anyway, not worrying about what anyone throughout of him. This shows the audience that Jesus is a true hero as he encompasses another characteristic of a true hero.

In summary, Jesus Christ, our Father, was and remains my hero and the hero of many others. You can see this as he displayed the characteristics of a hero throughout his everyday life, whilst working on achieving the greater good of all people, no matter who they are, healthy, sick, rich, or poor. It is believed still to this day that Jesus is the most influential, courageous, and selfless person to ever step foot on this planet.

Do you still believe in flying, invincible, and brave heroes? Even if you don’t believe in heroes with superpowers, there will always be a hero in all of us. The world is full of heroes, but we just haven’t realized it yet. Anyone can be a hero. You don’t need a fancy costume, a long cape, or braveness All you need is to believe in yourself that you can make the world a better place. In fact, many ordinary people became extraordinary by bringing a problem forward knowing that it wasn’t right. Being a hero or just doing a good deed is always a good thing, sometimes doing something good for the world boosts their confidence and makes them feel reassured that they matter.

Candace Lynne Lightner is a great example of a hero to the definition of heroism. Meanwhile, born in 1946, activist Candy Lightner spent her early life in California. She went to American River College in Sacramento and later married Steve Lightner. The couple had three children: twin daughters, Cari and Serena, and son Travis. In 1980, her daughter Cari was killed by a drunk driver. Lightner quickly formed Mothers Against Drunk Drivers to raise awareness of this problem and to fight for tough laws against offenders. She was appointed to a national commission on this issue by President Ronald Reagan in 1984. The following year, Lightner left MADD. She has continued to work on social and legal issues as an activist since then. She also serves as a consultant to organizations and companies. “Over time my efforts helped incite others to action. You kick a few pebbles, you turn a few stones, and eventually you have an avalanche” (The Gale Group). Candance Lynne Lightner was a full-time mom to a beautiful daughter. She became a hero and was known to mothers who have beautiful children and who would like to keep them safe. She was an ordinary citizen who loved her kids and decided to become extraordinary.

People are capable of anything that they put their minds to. Nevertheless, to be considered a hero, they shall be gentle and understanding. A hero doesn’t discriminate against any culture, race, religion, everyone is equal. Heroes decide to fight for what’s better and right for the world, not to gain fame. People become extraordinary by helping the community for the world as one, not just for themselves. Heroes don’t need to be people with a lot of money, all heroes need is a warm heart. A hero can be anyone who believes they can help transform the world.

A hero is someone who has given his or her life to something bigger than oneself. A hero is somebody who is selfless, generous in spirit, and just tries to give back as much as possible and help people. A hero is someone who saves people and who really deeply cares. A hero can be any person really intent on making this a better place for everyone. Hard times don’t create heroes. It is during the hard times when the ‘hero’ within us is revealed. If you can believe in yourself to become someone better and leave all your insecurities behind, that would be the best hero you can be. No person’s opinion can define you as a person, to stop you from becoming a hero yourself.

Works Cited

1. Biography.com Editors. “Candy Lightner”. Biography.com, A&E Networks Television, 2 Apr. 2014, www.biography.com/activist/candy-lightner
2. Prof. David J. Hanson. “Candy Lightner Founder of MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving)”. Alcohol Problems & Solutions, 22 May 1997, www.alcoholproblemsandsolutions.org/candy-lightner/
3. The Gale Group. “Candy Lightner”. Candy Lightner Facts, 2010, www.biography.yourdictionary.com/candy-lightner

If you were to be asked to describe a hero, would you say your mum, a surgeon that performed a miracle surgery? Or would you say a strong, brave male who lurks (ventures) the streets looking for citizens to help? The depiction of a hero has changed throughout history. However, their characteristics, personality, and physical capabilities greatly differ from epic heroes to heroes of the modern day. Most people in the 21st century would refer to epic heroes as ‘braggarts’ because they are known to always boast about their adventures, treasures, or battles. Now, heroes are more like ordinary people. A firefighter is a modern-day hero, and he could reside in the home next to you. Modern heroes are not out looking to accomplish great deeds. Their actions are often spontaneously performed, whereas epic heroes look for people or villages in distress. Epic heroes also work for a reward, while most modern-day heroes do not. A comparison of heroes can be made by examining two completely different texts written centuries apart to analyze and share my opinion on the contrasts and similarities of a modern verse epic hero. Despite both texts being different in culture, age, and form, they both still present the concept of a hero.

In most instances, heroes exemplify not only what society considers remarkable and impossible feats, but also the ideals of that society. Throughout history, the definition of a hero has changed concurrently with the values, morals, and challenges of humanity. Presently, Google defines a hero as a person who is admired for his courage, outstanding achievements, or noble. In the eighth century, a hero was defined by his courage, constancy, and self-sacrifice. The epic poem ‘Beowulf’, one of the first works of English literature, chronicles the adventures of Beowulf, the perfect example of an Anglo-Saxon epic hero. The poem explores Beowulf’s heroism in three progressively difficult feuds against Grendel, Grendel’s mother, and the dragon. With every victory, Beowulf further validates his place as a hero in the hearts and minds of Geats and Danes alike.

The 2014 film ‘Interstellar’ is set in a dystopian society where Earth is slowly becoming inhabitable due to a worldwide crop blight and the second Dust Bowl. The human race is at stake, yet no one dreams of leaving the planet. Their only hope of survival is to escape their dying world. Most audiences of this film would typically see Cooper as the hero of the movie, as he is a collection of ticked boxes; a single father and a test pilot who washed out and is now a corn farmer. He seems to fit all the masculine ideals of a hero. When the plot hands him an opportunity to be more than a parent and a farmer, he jumps at it with both hands open. To be clear, Cooper, Brand, Romilly, Doyle, and even poor Doctor Mann are unquestionably heroic. There is no way signing up for a probable one-way trip through a wormhole to an uncertain future could be anything other than that. However, Cooper, both John and Amelia Brand, and Mann, the characters we spend the bulk of the movie with, are hideously flawed when it comes to being heroes. For instance, the fact that Cooper was prepared to die to give Brand a shot at reaching the last world shows that he isn’t the true hero, because in any hero-based story, the hero is always the reason there is a happy ending for many people.

Referring to the eighth century, when the hero of a story, in this case – Beowulf, is clear to the audience, to now, where heroes are just ordinary people. To be a hero currently, you don’t need to be feted as a hero or have supernatural strength, but just ‘good’ and selfless intentions. Putting this theory into perspective, the true hero of ‘Interstellar’ is actually Coops’ daughter Murph. In fact, I am betting you might not have recognized her as being the main reason the human race survived. Heroes have changed, yes, but following the ‘hero’s journey’, the structure highlights that Murph was the hero behind the scenes all along, even though she didn’t sacrifice her life to solve the equation for glory as Beowulf did.